Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Vpr Induces Cell Cycle G2 Arrest through Srk1/MK2-Mediated Phosphorylation of Cdc25

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Vpr induces cell cycle G₂ arrest in fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe) and mammalian cells, suggesting the cellular pathway(s) targeted by Vpr is conserved among eukaryotes. Our previous studies in fission yeast demonstrated that Vpr induces G₂ arrest in part through inhibition of Cdc25, a Cdc2-specific phosphatase that promotes G₂/M transition. The goal of this study was to further elucidate molecular mechanism underlying the inhibitory effect of Vpr on Cdc25. We show here that, similar to the DNA checkpoint controls, expression of vpr promotes subcellular relocalization of Cdc25 from nuclear to cytoplasm and thereby prevents activation of Cdc2 by Cdc25. Vpr-induced nuclear exclusion of Cdc25 appears to depend on the serine/threonine phosphorylation of Cdc25 and the presence of Rad24/14-3-3 protein, since amino acid substitutions of the nine possible phosphorylation sites of Cdc25 with Ala (9A) or deletion of the rad24 gene abolished nuclear exclusion induced by Vpr. Interestingly, Vpr is still able to promote Cdc25 nuclear export in mutants defective in the checkpoints (rad3 and chk1/cds1), the kinases that are normally required for Cdc25 phosphorylation and nuclear exclusion of Cdc25, suggesting that others kinase(s) might modulate phosphorylation of Cdc25 for the Vpr-induced G₂ arrest. We report here that this kinase is Srk1. Deletion of the srk1 gene blocks the nuclear exclusion of Cdc25 caused by Vpr. Overexpression of srk1 induces cell elongation, an indication of cell cycle G₂ delay, in a similar fashion to Vpr; however, no additive effect of cell elongation was observed when srk1 and vpr were coexpressed, indicating Srk1 and Vpr are likely affecting the cell cycle G₂/M transition through the same cellular pathway. Immunoprecipitation further shows that Vpr and Srk1 are part of the same protein complex. Consistent with our findings in fission yeast, depletion of the MK2 gene, a human homologue of Srk1, either by small interfering RNA or an MK2 inhibitor suppresses Vpr-induced cell cycle G₂ arrest in mammalian cells. Collectively, our data suggest that Vpr induces cell cycle G₂ arrest at least in part through a Srk1/MK2-mediated mechanism.     

FHL2参与调控MCF-7细胞周期

目的：研究FHL2对细胞周期阻滞的影响。方法：应用pSR-GFP/Neo载体构建FHL2-siRNA干扰载体,转染MCF-7细胞,G418筛选稳定细胞系,通过流式细胞仪检测离子辐射后细胞周期的变化。结果：利用设计的FHL2-siRNA干扰载体能够干扰细胞中FHL2的表达;当离子辐射后,FHL2敲除细胞G2/M期阻滞的程度比野生型细胞显著降低。结论：FHL2参与调控MCF-7细胞离子辐射后细胞周期G2/M期阻滞。     

Induction of AIDS in Rhesus Monkeys by a Recombinant Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Expressing nef of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1

A nef gene is present in all primate lentiviruses, including human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and simian immunodeficiency virus of macaque monkeys (SIVmac). However, the nef genes of HIV-1 and SIVmac exhibit minimal sequence identity, and not all properties are shared by the two. Nef sequences of SIVmac239 were replaced by four independent nef alleles of HIV-1 in a context that was optimal for expression. The sources of the HIV-1 nef sequences included NL 4-3, a variant NL 4-3 gene derived from a recombinant-infected rhesus monkey, a patient nef allele, and a nef consensus sequence. Of 16 rhesus monkeys infected with these SHIVnef chimeras, 9 maintained high viral loads for prolonged periods, as observed with the parental SIVmac239, and 6 have died with AIDS 52 to 110 weeks postinfection. Persistent high loads were observed at similar frequencies with the four different SIV recombinants that expressed these independent HIV-1 nef alleles. Infection with other recombinant SHIVnef constructions resulted in sequence changes in infected monkeys that either created an open nef reading frame or optimized the HIV-1 nef translational context. The HIV-1 nef gene was uniformly retained in all SHIVnef-infected monkeys. These results demonstrate that HIV-1 nef can substitute for SIVmac nef in vivo to produce a pathogenic infection. However, the model suffers from an inability to consistently obtain persisting high viral loads in 100% of the infected animals, as is observed with the parental SIVmac239.     

Formation of Syncytia Is Repressed by Tetraspanins in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Producing Cells

In vitro propagation studies have established that human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is most efficiently transmitted at the virological synapse that forms between producer and target cells. Despite the presence of the viral envelope glycoprotein (Env) and CD4 and chemokine receptors at the respective surfaces, producer and target cells usually do not fuse with each other but disengage after the viral particles have been delivered, consistent with the idea that syncytia, at least in vitro, are not required for HIV-1 spread. Here, we tested whether tetraspanins, which are well known regulators of cellular membrane fusion processes that are enriched at HIV-1 exit sites, regulate syncytium formation. We found that overexpression of tetraspanins in producer cells leads to reduced syncytium formation, while downregulation has the opposite effect. Further, we document that repression of Env-induced cell-cell fusion by tetraspanins depends on the presence of viral Gag, and we demonstrate that fusion repression requires the recruitment of Env by Gag to tetraspanin-enriched microdomains (TEMs). However, sensitivity to fusion repression by tetraspanins varied for different viral strains, despite comparable recruitment of their Envs to TEMs. Overall, these data establish tetraspanins as negative regulators of HIV-1-induced cell-cell fusion, and they start delineating the requirements for this regulation.The envelope glycoprotein (Env) of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is incorporated into released virus particles and enables the virus to attach to and fuse with target cells in order to initiate the infectious cycle. Before Env mediates the fusion of viral and cellular membranes, i.e., while it is still incorporated in the plasma membrane of the infected cell, it drives the adhesion between virus producer cell and target cells, which gives rise to the formation of the so-called virological synapse (VS) (21, 24, 35, 36). The VS shares certain characteristics with the immunological synapse, including an accumulation of specific cellular membrane proteins and lipids (see, e.g., reference 5), and it provides efficient and secure transfer of virus particles from infected to uninfected cells (8). Importantly, the two adhering cells, like the pre- and postsynaptic cells that form an immunological synapse, typically do not fuse during such cell-to-cell transfer events. At first glance this seems surprising, as HIV-1 Env, unlike many other viral envelope proteins, can induce membrane fusion at physiological pH. Also, adhesion of producer and target cell, which can be initiated when the uropod of the infected cell contacts the uninfected cell (8), followed by reorganization of the cytoskeleton (25) and formation of full-fledged synapses, can extend over minutes (see, e.g., reference 20). This process should allow enough time to trigger cell-cell fusion. However, it is now well established that newly synthesized Env is efficiently internalized upon its arrival at the host cell plasma membrane, unless it is recruited into budding structures by viral Gag (see, e.g., reference 11; also discussed in references 3 and 6). Further, and likely also contributing to the prevention of producer-target cell fusion, immature Gag at the host cell plasma membrane represses Env-driven fusion, and this repression is lost only once Gag is processed in released virions (9, 22, 23, 31, 50). Finally, because syncytia are clearly not required for the transmission of virus from cell to cell in vitro and are possibly detrimental to virus spread in vivo, we hypothesize that HIV-1 cooperates with cellular membrane proteins to prevent cell-cell fusion.Members of a group of cellular proteins known as tetraspanins play an important role as regulators of cellular fusion processes, including myotube formation and fertilization (28, 30, 44; reviewed in, e.g., reference 17). As membrane organizers, these proteins homo- and heteromultimerize and associate with other cellular proteins to form variably sized but discrete microdomains, the so-called tetraspanin-enriched microdomains (TEMs) (29) (also called TERMs [1] or TEAs [12]). Knowledge of the molecular mechanisms through which tetraspanins regulate the fusion of cellular membranes is still lacking, though the available evidence strongly suggests (i) that these proteins are not themselves fusogens but rather that they coordinate the fusion activity of other cellular proteins and (ii) that they can act both as positive and negative regulators of cellular fusion processes. For instance, several in vivo studies unequivocally showed that CD9 expression in oocytes is essential for sperm-egg fusion (27, 28, 30), but CD9 and CD81 ablation in monocytes enhances the formation of multinucleated phagocytes that are involved in immune defense against certain microbes (45). Interestingly, the same two tetraspanins are also known to regulate virus-induced fusion processes. CD9 is involved in regulating cell-cell fusion driven by canine distemper virus, as the anti-CD9 antibody K41 inhibits syncytium formation by this virus (42), and CD81 is a necessary cofactor for infection of cells by hepatitis C virus (see, e.g., references 2 and 52). Finally, tetraspanins on uninfected (target) cells inhibit HIV-1-induced cell-cell fusion (14). This fusion regulation is likely due to interactions of CD9 and CD81 with CD4 and coreceptors at the surface of target cells, though the tetraspanin CD63 has also been implicated in the trafficking of CXCR4 to the plasma membrane (51).Because tetraspanins in HIV-1-producing cells are enriched at budding sites (4, 10, 13, 15, 33, 46, 49) and at the VS (26), we hypothesized that they regulate Env-driven fusion at the VS. Here, we document that tetraspanins in HIV-1-producing cells can indeed restrict syncytium formation. We also define some of the requirements for this fusion inhibition, thus laying the necessary groundwork for future mechanistic analyses. In addition, the characterization of cell-cell fusion regulation parameters in this study will allow the fusion-inhibitory activities to be distinguished from other regulatory functions exerted by tetraspanins, such as the modulation of virion infectivity and the regulation of cell-to-cell transmission of HIV-1.     

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2 Vpx-Gag Interaction

Incorporation of Vpx into human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) virus-like particles is mediated by the Gag polyprotein. We have identified residues 15 to 40 of Gag p6 and residues 73 to 89 of Vpx as being necessary for virion incorporation. In addition, we show enhanced in vitro binding of Vpx to a chimeric HIV-1/HIV-2 Gag construct containing residues 2 to 49 of HIV-2 p6 and demonstrate that the presence of residues 73 to 89 of Vpx allows for in vitro binding to HIV-2 Gag.     

Formation of Mobile Chromatin-Associated Nuclear Foci Containing HIV-1 Vpr and VPRBP Is Critical for the Induction of G2 Cell Cycle Arrest

HIV-1 Viral protein R (Vpr) induces a cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase by activating the ATR DNA damage/stress checkpoint. Recently, we and several other groups showed that Vpr performs this activity by recruiting the DDB1-CUL4A (VPRBP) E3 ubiquitin ligase. While recruitment of this E3 ubiquitin ligase complex has been shown to be required for G2 arrest, the subcellular compartment where this complex forms and functionally acts is unknown. Herein, using immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy, we show that Vpr forms nuclear foci in several cell types including HeLa cells and primary CD4+ T-lymphocytes. These nuclear foci contain VPRBP and partially overlap with DNA repair foci components such as γ-H2AX, 53BP1 and RPA32. While treatment with the non-specific ATR inhibitor caffeine or depletion of VPRBP by siRNA did not inhibit formation of Vpr nuclear foci, mutations in the C-terminal domain of Vpr and cytoplasmic sequestration of Vpr by overexpression of Gag-Pol resulted in impaired formation of these nuclear structures and defective G2 arrest. Consistently, we observed that G2 arrest-competent sooty mangabey Vpr could form these foci but not its G2 arrest-defective paralog Vpx, suggesting that formation of Vpr nuclear foci represents a critical early event in the induction of G2 arrest. Indeed, we found that Vpr could associate to chromatin via its C-terminal domain and that it could form a complex with VPRBP on chromatin. Finally, analysis of Vpr nuclear foci by time-lapse microscopy showed that they were highly mobile and stable structures. Overall, our results suggest that Vpr recruits the DDB1-CUL4A (VPRBP) E3 ligase to these nuclear foci and uses these mobile structures to target a chromatin-bound cellular substrate for ubiquitination in order to induce DNA damage/replication stress, ultimately leading to ATR activation and G2 cell cycle arrest.     

Cytotoxic T Cells from Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2-Infected Patients Frequently Cross-React with Different Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Clades

Knowledge of immune mechanisms responsible for the cross-protection between highly divergent viruses such as human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and HIV-2 may contribute to an understanding of whether virus variability may be overcome in the design of vaccine candidates which are broadly protective across the HIV subtypes. We demonstrate that despite the significant difference in virus amino acid sequence, the majority of HIV-2-infected individuals with different HLA molecules possess a dominant cytotoxic T-cell response which is able to recognize HIV-1 Gag protein. Furthermore, HLA-B5801-positive subjects show broad cross-recognition of HIV-1 subtypes since they mounted a T-cell response that tolerated extensive amino acid substitutions within HLA-B5801-restricted HIV-1 and HIV-2 epitopes. These results suggests that HLA-B5801-positive HIV-2-infected individuals have an enhanced ability to react with HIV-1 that could play a role in cross-protection.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and HIV-2 are related human retroviruses that show various biological and structural differences. HIV-2 is found mainly in West Africa, whereas HIV-1 is spreading throughout the world. HIV-2 is less transmissible, and HIV-2-positive patients exhibit longer clinical latency periods than individuals infected with HIV-1 (23). A recent report has also shown that the mortality in HIV-2-infected individuals is only twice as high as in the uninfected population and, in the majority of adults, survival is not affected by HIV-2 status (31).Although the two viruses are similar in genomic organization, various genetic and enzymatic differences have been found at many stages of the retroviral life cycle. They differ significantly in terms of amino acid sequence, the more conserved being the Pol and Gag sequences, which exhibit less than 60% homology (17).Despite these differences, epidemiological data and animal studies have shown some evidence of cross-protection between the two viral infections. Travers et al. reported that HIV-2-infected women had a lower incidence of HIV-1 infection than did HIV-seronegative women in a cohort of commercial sexual workers in Dakar (37), and rhesus macaques immunized with a recombinant HIV-1 poxvirus vaccine are protected against HIV-2 challenge (2). These studies, though not conclusive (1, 6), suggest that differences in the virus may not necessarily preclude the development of defensive immunity to a subsequent pathogenic infection, an old-fashioned concept pioneered by Jenner, who used cowpox to vaccinate against human smallpox.The immunological basis of cross-protection is largely unknown, and a clear understanding of the role played by the humoral or cell-mediated immune response in HIV protection is still lacking. However, mounting evidence suggests that cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) response could be the key element. Indeed, the protection afforded in animal models against simian (13) and feline (12) immunodeficiency virus infections is closely correlated with the induction of specific CTL response, and HIV-1 and HIV-2 HLA-B35-restricted cross-reactive CTLs have been postulated to confer protection against repeated HIV exposure (33).CTLs recognize short viral peptides, 8 to 11 amino acids long, that are generated by the intracellular processing of endogenously synthesized viral antigens within the infected cells, which are expressed at the cell surface in the binding groove of HLA class I molecules. The specificity of the T-cell response is determined by the interaction of the antigen-specific T-cell receptor (TCR) with the peptide-HLA complex, and this interaction, together with non-antigen-specific signals, activates the CTLs (15).The presence of cross-reactive CTLs able to lyse HIV-1- or HIV-2-infected cells should be dependent on the extent of conservation between the two viruses within the epitopes selected by particular HLA class I molecules. It is well known that amino acid substitutions within the epitopes can abrogate the CTL response by inhibiting either HLA binding or TCR recognition (32). However, a number of recent studies have shown that T cells can recognize apparently unrelated peptides (10, 41), and crystallographic data have shown physical limits to the TCR epitope specificity due to the limited size of contact between the TCR and the peptide (14), suggesting a flexibility in T-cell recognition of antigen (19).Some individuals with a particular HLA profile which is responsible for presentation of the viral antigen and for selection of the T-cell repertoire may possess a CTL response not affected by mutations within the epitope, as has been demonstrated in subjects with HLA alleles B27 (28) and B35 (33). In these cases, amino acid substitutions within the HIV-1 and -2 epitopes were tolerated by the CTLs.In this study, we have investigated the extent of cross-reacting CTLs between HIV-2 and HIV-1 in a group of HIV-2-infected subjects with different HLA class I types. We have shown that despite differences in amino acid sequence between the two viruses, the majority of HIV-2-positive subjects possess CTLs which are able to recognize HIV-1 Gag protein.Furthermore, analysis of HLA profiles and the fine specificity of the cytotoxic response demonstrated that HLA-B5801-positive subjects show broad cross-recognition of HIV-1 isolates. These subjects mounted a CTL response that tolerated extensive amino acid substitutions within an HLA-B5801-restricted HIV-1 epitope.     

Induction of G1 Cell Cycle Arrest in Human Glioma Cells by Salinomycin Through Triggering ROS-Mediated DNA Damage In Vitro and In Vivo

Chemotherapy has always been one of the most effective ways in combating human glioma. However, the high metastatic potential and resistance toward standard chemotherapy severely hindered the chemotherapy outcomes. Hence, searching effective chemotherapy drugs and clarifying its mechanism are of great significance. Salinomycin an antibiotic shows novel anticancer potential against several human tumors, including human glioma, but its mechanism against human glioma cells has not been fully elucidated. In the present study, we demonstrated that salinomycin treatment time- and dose-dependently inhibited U251 and U87 cells growth. Mechanically, salinomycin-induced cell growth inhibition against human glioma was mainly achieved by induction of G1-phase arrest via triggering reactive oxide species (ROS)-mediated DNA damage, as convinced by the activation of histone, p53, p21 and p27. Furthermore, inhibition of ROS accumulation effectively attenuated salinomycin-induced DNA damage and G1 cell cycle arrest, and eventually reversed salinomycin-induced cytotoxicity. Importantly, salinomycin treatment also significantly inhibited the U251 tumor xenograft growth in vivo through triggering DNA damage-mediated cell cycle arrest with involvement of inhibiting cell proliferation and angiogenesis. The results above validated the potential of salinomycin-based chemotherapy against human glioma.     

CD4-Immunoglobulin G2 Protects Hu-PBL-SCID Mice against Challenge by Primary Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Isolates

CD4-immunoglobulin G2 (IgG2) is a fusion protein comprising human IgG2 in which the Fv portions of both heavy and light chains have been replaced by the V1 and V2 domains of human CD4. Previous studies found that CD4-IgG2 potently neutralizes a broad range of primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates in vitro and ex vivo. The current report demonstrates that CD4-IgG2 protects against infection by primary isolates of HIV-1 in vivo, using the hu-PBL-SCID mouse model. Passive administration of 10 mg of CD4-IgG2 per kg of body weight protected all animals against subsequent challenge with 10 mouse infectious doses of the laboratory-adapted T-cell-tropic isolate HIV-1_LAI, while 50 mg of CD4-IgG2 per kg protected four of five mice against the primary isolates HIV-1_JR-CSF and HIV-1_AD6. In contrast, a polyclonal HIV-1 Ig fraction exhibited partial protection against HIV-1_LAI at 150 mg/kg but no significant protection against the primary HIV-1 isolates. The results demonstrate that CD4-IgG2 effectively neutralizes primary HIV-1 isolates in vivo and can prevent the initiation of infection by these viruses.     

Annexin 2 Is Not Required for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Particle Production but Plays a Cell Type-Dependent Role in Regulating Infectivity

During assembly and budding of retroviruses, host cell proteins are incorporated into viral particles. Identification of virion-associated proteins may help pinpoint key cellular components required for virus production and function. The cellular protein annexin 2 (Anx2) is incorporated into HIV-1 particles, and knockdown of Anx2 has been reported to cause defects in Gag processing and infectivity of HIV-1 particles in macrophages. Here, we tested whether Anx2 was required for HIV-1 production in other cell types capable of producing HIV-1 virions. Endogenous Anx2 levels were knocked down by ∼98% using lentivirus encoding short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) or small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) targeting Anx2. Under these conditions, there was no reduction in HIV-1 virus-like particle (VLP) production in either COS-1, 293T, or Jurkat T cells or primary human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs). Murine embryonic fibroblasts derived from Anx2^−/− mice produced the same levels of VLPs as matched cells from wild-type mice. The calcium-mediated spike in VLP production still occurred in Anx2-depleted COS-1 cells, and there was no apparent alteration in the intracellular Gag localization. Overexpression of Anx2 in trans had no effect on Gag processing or VLP production. Neither Anx2 depletion nor Anx2 overexpression altered the infectivity of HIV-1 particles produced by COS-1 or 293T cells. However, supernatants containing virus from Anx2 siRNA-treated primary human MDMs exhibited decreased infectivity. These data indicate that Anx2 is not required for HIV-1 assembly or Gag processing but rather plays a cell type-dependent role in regulating production of infectious HIV-1 by macrophages.The Gag polyprotein generates the key structural proteins for all retroviruses. Gag is necessary and sufficient for the formation of virus-like particles (VLPs), which are morphologically similar to immature virions. Following its synthesis in the cytoplasm, HIV-1 Gag is trafficked to sites of particle production on membranes. Viral particle production depends on Gag-membrane interactions mediated by the myristoylated MA domain of Gag (18, 22, 31) and Gag-Gag interactions mediated by the CA and NC domains. Budding and release of the new virion are mediated by the Gag p6 domain. For successful particle production to occur, HIV-1 Gag must also interact with numerous host cell proteins and protein complexes. Identification of these interactions provides a crucial window into determining Gag trafficking intermediates as well as clues to the mechanism of virion production.The host cell protein annexin 2 (Anx2) has recently attracted attention for its potential to regulate key processes in both cells and viruses (9, 14, 17, 24). Anx2 belongs to a family of conserved calcium-regulated proteins and interacts with actin, membranes, and negatively charged phospholipids. The major protein binding partner for Anx2 is p11, also known as S100A10. Two populations of Anx2 have been identified: a heterotetrameric complex with two molecules of Anx2 and two molecules of p11 (found predominantly at the plasma membrane) and a monomeric form found mainly in the cytoplasm. Anx2 performs multiple functions in the cell, including regulation of actin-based dynamics, fibrinolysis, calcium-mediated exocytosis, and transport of intermediates from early to late endosomes (10, 14-16) Anx2 also enhances binding and fusion of cytomegalovirus with phospholipid membranes (21). In addition, Anx2 can be detected within influenza virus particles (28), where it has been shown to aid in virus replication (9).Several lines of evidence suggest that Anx2 may play a role in HIV-1 biogenesis. Both Anx2 and its binding partner p11 are incorporated in HIV-1 particles produced by macrophages (2). Anx2 interacts with Gag in macrophages, and annexin 2 knockdown has been reported to cause defective Gag processing and reduced infectivity of the released particles (24). Blockade of Anx2 function, with either anti-Anx2 antibody or small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated knockdown, results in suppression of HIV-1 infection in macrophages (11). Anx2 also binds to Gag in 293T cells, and expression of Anx2 in trans in these cells has been reported to lead to increased Gag processing and HIV-1 production (7). Taken together, these findings suggest that Anx2 might play a universal role in Gag trafficking and particle production. To test this hypothesis, we exploited methods to efficiently knock down Anx2 expression and determined the effect of Anx2 knockdown in a variety of cell lines capable of producing HIV-1 virions. Here we show that, in the absence of Anx2 expression, HIV-1 Gag is expressed, trafficked, and capable of mediating viral particle formation in a manner similar to that of control cells expressing Anx2. However, a cell type-dependent effect of Anx2 depletion on HIV-1 infectivity was detected in primary human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs). These findings suggest that Anx2 might be a macrophage-specific host cell factor that regulates HIV-1 infectivity.     

Induction of Potent Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Specific T-Cell-Restricted Immunity by Genetically Modified Dendritic Cells

A novel technology combining replication- and integration-defective human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vectors with genetically modified dendritic cells was developed in order to induce T-cell immunity. We introduced the vector into dendritic cells as a plasmid DNA using polyethylenimine as the gene delivery system, thereby circumventing the problem of obtaining viral vector expression in the absence of integration. Genetically modified dendritic cells (GMDC) presented viral epitopes efficiently, secreted interleukin 12, and primed both CD4(+) and CD8(+) HIV-specific T cells capable of producing gamma interferon and exerting potent HIV-1-specific cytotoxicity in vitro. In nonhuman primates, subcutaneously injected GMDC migrated into the draining lymph node at an unprecedentedly high rate and expressed the plasmid DNA. The animals presented a vigorous HIV-specific effector cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte (CTL) response as early as 3 weeks after a single immunization, which later developed into a memory CTL response. Interestingly, antibodies did not accompany these CTL responses, indicating that GMDC can induce a pure Th1 type of immune response. Successful induction of a broad and long-lasting HIV-specific cellular immunity is expected to control virus replication in infected individuals.     

Clade-Specific Evolution Mediated by HLA-B*57/5801 in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Clade A1 p24

HLA-B*57-mediated selection pressure leads to a typical escape pathway in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) CD8 epitopes such as TW10. Whether this T242N pathway is shared by all clades remains unknown. We therefore assessed the nature of HLA-B*57 selection in a large, observational Kenyan cohort where clades A1 and D predominate. While T242N was ubiquitous in clade D HLA-B*57⁺ subjects, this mutation was rare (15%) in clade A1. Instead, P243T and I247L were selected by clade A1-infected HLA-B*57 subjects but not by HLA-B*5801⁺ subjects. Our data suggest that clade A1 consensus proline at Gag residue 243 might represent an inherent block to T242N escape in clade A1. We confirmed immunologically that P243T and I247L likely represent escape mutations. HLA-B*57 evolution also differed between clades in the KF11 and IW9 epitopes. A better understanding of clade-specific evolution is important for the development of HIV vaccines in regions with multiple clades.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) displays extreme genetic diversity, with nine clades (subtypes) described in group M, and frequent genomic recombination among and within the clades (7, 44). HIV is also capable of rapid evolution, which can lead to mutational escape from immune control (43). Escape from CD8⁺ T-cell responses occurs frequently in HIV-1 infection through mutations that affect epitope processing, HLA class I binding, and/or T-cell receptor recognition (23). In early HIV-1 infection, the majority of amino acid substitutions are associated HLA class I alleles (1). The timing and consequences of mutational escape from CD8⁺ T-cell responses vary considerably (8, 22).HLA-B*57, and to a lesser extent HLA-B*5801, has been associated with slower progression to AIDS in several studies (18, 27, 39), and HLA-B*5701 was associated with a lower viremia set point in a genome-wide association study (16). Several attributes of HLA-B*57-restricted CD8⁺ T-cell responses may contribute to their protectiveness, including dominant responses in acute infection (2), recognition of protective epitopes in HIV-1 p24 (33), better recognition of epitope variation (45), and retention of proliferative capability in chronic infection (24).HLA-B*57/5801 also exert powerful selection pressure on HIV to avoid CD8⁺ T-cell recognition. This was first demonstrated in the HLA-B*57-restricted TW10 epitope (TSTLQEQIGW [Gag_240-249]), which accounts for >30% of overall HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses in acutely infected HLA-B*57⁺ subjects (3). Escape in this epitope usually occurs early in infection, which coincidently is when HLA-B*57 is most protective (18). In clade B and C infections, >75 to 100% of HLA-B*57/5801⁺ subjects develop the T242N escape mutation, while HLA-B*57/5701-negative subjects rarely display polymorphism at this residue (5, 9, 10, 15, 32, 35, 38, 41). When T242N is transmitted to HLA-B*57/5801-negative subjects, it rapidly reverts to the consensus, suggesting that T242N is associated with a fitness defect (32, 35).While CD8⁺ T-cell cross-clade recognition has been tested extensively (6, 11, 19, 36, 48), few studies have addressed the possibility of clade-specific escape from CD8⁺ T-cell responses. This may be especially relevant where clade consensus sequences differ in immunologically relevant epitopes. Here we demonstrate in a large Kenyan cohort substantial differences in HLA-B*57/B*5801-mediated selection among HIV clades.Participants were enrolled from a Nairobi, Kenya-based cohort, and the relevant ethical review boards approved the study. HLA typing was performed as described previously (34). CD4 counts were measured longitudinally at biannual visits. Multiple and other clade infections were excluded. The HIV-1 p24 gene was amplified from proviral HIV DNA or RNA using a nested PCR approach and sequenced, and viral subtyping was carried out as described previously (42). Previously described HLA-B*57 epitopes IW9 (ISPRTLNAW), KF11 (KAFSPEVIPMF), and TW10 (TSTLQEQIGW) and selected variants were tested in immunological assays and described where relevant. Gamma interferon enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assays were performed as described previously (37) using blood samples from HLA-B*57⁺ and -B*5801⁺ subjects. All peptides were tested at concentrations of 10 μg, 1 μg, 0.1 μg, and 0.01 μg/ml. Responses were considered positive if they were more than two times higher than that of the negative control and were measured at ≥100 spot-forming units ml⁻¹. Fisher''s exact test and chi-square analyses were used to determine differences among groups in categorical analyses. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare response magnitudes and disease progression between groups.We confirmed the protective effects of HLA-B*57 in clade A1 infection (mean of 9.9 years versus 7.8 years until CD4 counts were <200, P = 0.041) (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). Slow progressors were overrepresented in HLA-B*57⁺ clade A1⁺ subjects (52.2%) compared to both HLA-B*5801⁺ clade A1⁺ (13.3%, P = 0.02) and HLA-B*57/5801-negative clade A1⁺ (27.8%, P = 0.028) subjects (Fig. ​(Fig.1b).1b). In contrast to what has been shown for other clades (2, 27), protection was not observed for clade A1-infected HLA-B*5801⁺ subjects (mean of 6.5 years versus 7.8 years until CD4 counts were <200, P > 0.3) (Fig. ​(Fig.11).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.HLA-B*57, but not HLA-B*5801, is associated with a lower rate of disease progression in clade A1-infected subjects than that of the overall cohort. (a) Number of years from cohort entry until sequential CD4 counts fell below 200/μl. (b) Slow progressors (>10 years with CD4 counts of >200) were also more common in HLA-B*57⁺ clade A1-infected subjects than in those expressing HLA-B*5801 or neither.Stratification of TW10 (Gag_240-249) proviral sequences on the basis of HLA allele and clade revealed several differences in selection between clades A1 and D (Fig. ​(Fig.2a).2a). We observed the expected T242N substitution in 100% of HLA-B*57⁺ clade D-infected subjects (7/7), compared to only 14.7% variability at Gag residue 242 in HLA-B*57/5801-negative subjects (13/88, P = 3.26 × 10⁻⁹) (Fig. ​(Fig.2b).2b). In contrast, T242N was found infrequently in clade A1-infected HLA-B*57⁺ subjects (15%, 5/33, P = 0.0004). Instead, variants containing the mutations P243T and I247L were more frequently observed (both observed in 11/33 subjects). Overall, variation at residues 243 and 247 was more common in HLA-B*57⁺ subjects (51% and 15%, respectively; P = 2.92 × 10⁻⁶) than in HLA-B*57/5801-negative clade A1⁺ subjects (33% and 9%, respectively; P = 0.0008). Selection at both residues 243 and 247 was observed only in 2/33 HLA-B*57⁺ subjects, suggesting that these mutations are independent. Selection at residue 248, observed in clade B infection (32), was not evident in either clade A1 or D. While I247X selection has been described in other clades at low frequencies and in elite controllers (21, 40), HLA-B*57-mediated selection at Gag residue 243 has not yet been described. In summary, the T242N mutation, which is typical of other clades, does not appear to be the primary escape mutant in clade A1.Open in a separate windowFIG. 2.HLA-B*57-mediated selection in TW10 differs between clade A1 and clade D. (a) TW10 sequences were stratified by HLA-B*57, HLA-B*5801, or other alleles (HLA-B*57/5801⁻) and compared between clades A1 and D, based on the clade B consensus TW10 sequence. Each subject is represented by one sequence, and the numbers of subjects with a given sequence are shown in parentheses. A summary of variation from the TW10 consensus at Gag residues 242, 243, 247, and 248 is shown for HLA-B*57⁺ (b) and -B*5801⁺ (c) subjects. (b and c) Clade D is shown at the top, and clade A1 is shown at the bottom. Variation is shown in dark gray, and consensus is shown in light gray. (d) The proportions of clade A1-infected subjects with selection at Gag residue 242 only, and those with selection at residues 242 and 243 in combination, are shown. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.005; ***, P < 0.0005.Previous studies have suggested that HLA-B*5801 places selection pressure on TW10, similar to that of HLA-B*57 (35). Similar to clades B and C, selection of T242N was evident in HLA-B*5801⁺ clade D-infected subjects (TW10 variation in 8/11 HLA-B*5801⁺ subjects versus 13/88 HLA-B*57/5801-negative subjects; P = 0.0069) (Fig. ​(Fig.2c).2c). Limited T242N selection was observed in clade A1-infected HLA-B*5801⁺ subjects, and in contrast to HLA-B*57, there were no HLA-B*5801-associated substitutions at residues 243 and 247 in clade A1 (P values of 0.75 and 0.29, respectively) (Fig. ​(Fig.2c).2c). In summary, these data suggest that in addition to HLA-B*5801 not being associated with protection in clade A1 (Fig. ​(Fig.1),1), HLA-B*5801 does not select the HLA-B*57-associated clade A1 TW10 escape mutations.Inclusion of all clade A1 sequences with T242X substitutions (regardless of the HLA allele) reveals that in every case (10/10), there is an accompanying residue 243 mutation. Polymorphisms at these sites correlate very strongly (P = 3.71 × 10⁻⁸) (Fig. ​(Fig.2d).2d). Together, these data suggest that residue 242 polymorphism in clade A1 is incompatible with proline at residue 243, which is the clade A1 consensus.We next assessed the immunological implications of novel clade A1 variants in HLA-B*57⁺ (n = 12) and -B*5801⁺ (n = 6) subjects infected primarily by clade A1. Clade A1-infected subjects commonly made anamnestic, low-avidity responses to TW10. The majority of HLA-B*57⁺ subjects who recognized clade A1 TW10 did not respond to P243T or I247L in ELISPOT assays (Fig. ​(Fig.3),3), supporting the hypothesis that these represent escape mutations. Those who did recognize P243T and I247L had lower magnitude responses than those who recognized clade A1 TW10 at the 10-μg/ml peptide concentration (P of 0.0005 for both) (Fig. ​(Fig.3a).3a). Similarly, these variants were not well recognized by CD8⁺ T cells from HLA-B*5801⁺ subjects (Fig. ​(Fig.3b).3b). For two HLA-B*57⁺ subjects, P243T and I247L responses had lower avidity than clade A1 TW10 responses (Fig. ​(Fig.3c).3c). These data support the hypothesis that P243T and I247L likely represent escape mutations.Open in a separate windowFIG. 3.Peptides with novel TW10 clade A1-selected mutations are poorly recognized in ex vivo gamma interferon ELISPOT avidity assays, suggestive of escape mutations. ELISPOT responses to TW10 and variants at 10 μg/ml peptide by HLA-B*57⁺ (a) and HLA-B*5801⁺ (b) subjects are shown. (c) The functional avidity of TW10 and variants for two HLA-B*57⁺ subjects is shown, suggesting that P243T and I247L are less recognized than TW10, particularly at lower peptide concentrations. Sequence names are described in the text. (d) Elispot responses to A1 TW10 and T242N correlated at 10 μg/ml. SFU/m, spot-forming units/million PBMCs.Recognition of the clade B/D consensus (TSTLQEQIGW) was diminished compared to that of clade A1 TW10. However, despite the presumed absence of this variant in these subjects'' autologous sequences, the clade B/D escape variant (TSNLQEQIGW [T242N]) was recognized at a magnitude similar to that of the consensus clade A1 TW10 (r = 0.71, P = 0.0099) (Fig. ​(Fig.3d).3d). No responses to T242N/G248A were observed (not shown), as described previously (32). These data suggest that clade A1 and B TW10, and their escape variants, are immunologically distinct from one another.We next assessed whether clade-specific selection was evident in other immunodominant HLA-B*57 p24 epitopes that are commonly targeted in chronic clade B infection (2). In clade D IW9 (ISPRTLNAW [Gag_147-155]), variants containing the escape variant I147L (14) were more common in HLA-B*57⁺ subjects than in HLA-B*57/5801-negative subjects (86% and 30%, respectively; P = 0.0055) (Table ​(Table1).1). However, this variant was not selected in clade A1 (variation in 30% versus 21% subjects; P value was not significant), where leucine is the consensus. Interestingly, ELISPOT data indicated substantial cross-reactivity between 147L and 147I in clade A1-infected subjects (10 μg/ml, r = 0.987, P < 0.0001) (data not shown), suggesting that infection with an escape variant from one clade (clade D) does not necessarily preclude recognition of this epitope in another one (clade A1). Other amino acids (F, M, and P) were common in HLA-B*57⁺ subjects at residue 147 (>30% versus 3% in HLA-B*57/5801-negative subjects, P = 3.85 × 10⁻⁶). Although the immunological consequences are unknown, these HLA-associated substitutions could represent novel escape variants.

TABLE 1.

p24 sequences in HLA-B*57⁺ subjects infected by clades A1 and D

Coreceptor Utilization by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Is Not a Primary Determinant of Neutralization Sensitivity

We have examined the relationship between coreceptor utilization and sensitivity to neutralization in a primary isolate of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and its T-cell line-adapted (TCLA) derivative. We determined that adaptation of the primary-isolate (PI) virus 168P results in the loss of the unique capacity of PI viruses to utilize the CCR5 coreceptor and in the acquisition by the TCLA 168C virus of sensitivity to neutralization by V3-directed monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). In experiments wherein infection by 168P is directed via either the CCR5 or the CXCR4 pathway, we demonstrate that the virus, as well as pseudotyped virions bearing a molecularly cloned 168P envelope protein, remains refractory to neutralization by MAbs 257-D, 268-D, and 50.1 regardless of the coreceptor utilized. This study suggests that coreceptor utilization is not a primary determinant of differential neutralization sensitivity in PI and TCLA viruses.Although CD4 had long been recognized as the cellular receptor to which the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV) envelope protein binds (9, 21, 22), it had also been recognized that expression of CD4 alone is insufficient to render nonhuman cells susceptible to HIV infection (4, 5, 22). Similarly, different HIV isolates display different abilities to infect CD4-positive human macrophages, T lymphocytes, and established T-cell lines (31, 32, 35), suggesting that additional molecules may be responsible for cell tropism specificity. During the past year, cellular molecules that act in conjunction with CD4 have been identified as required cofactors for HIV envelope protein-mediated binding and entry (1, 6, 10–12, 14). These HIV coreceptors are members of the superfamily of seven-transmembrane segment G-protein-coupled receptors and act primarily as cellular receptors for chemokines.The discovery of cellular coreceptors for HIV has provided new perspectives for understanding these early events in HIV infection (see review in reference 2). Thus, phenotypically distinct isolates of HIV utilize as coreceptors different chemokine receptor molecules. Although all primary isolates of HIV infect primary T lymphocytes, some also infect cells of the macrophage lineage (31, 32). These monocyteropic isolates utilize the CCR5 chemokine receptor, whose natural ligands include the chemokines RANTES, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β (1, 6, 10–12). Monocytropic isolates do not induce syncytia in primary lymphocyte culture and do not infect established T-cell lines (31). During the late course of HIV infection, syncytium-inducing (SI) primary viruses often arise from the population of monocytropic viruses (31, 32). These SI primary isolates no longer infect macrophages, and they utilize both CCR5 and another chemokine receptor, CXCR4 (7, 33, 38). CXCR4, whose natural chemokine ligand is SDF-1 (3, 27), was originally identified by Feng et al. as the cofactor used by laboratory-adapted viruses (14). In fact, the common laboratory viruses (IIIb/LAI, LAV, and RF) are unable to utilize CCR5 coreceptor (1, 6, 10–12), presumably reflecting the lack of CCR5 expression in most established T-cell lines (1, 13). Although some primary isolates utilize additional chemokine receptor molecules, notably CCR3 and CCR2b (6, 11, 18), the relationship between these coreceptors and viral phenotypes is less clear. The ability to utilize CCR5 coreceptor, however, is unique to primary-isolate (PI) viruses.Paralleling these differences in coreceptor utilization and cell tropism are differences in sensitivity to virus neutralization. Although laboratory-adapted isolates of HIV can be potently neutralized by sera elicited by recombinant gp120 (rgp120) protein, primary isolates are largely refractory to neutralization by rgp120 vaccine sera (23, 37). Similarly, PI viruses are significantly more resistant than T-cell line-adapted (TCLA) viruses to neutralization by gp120-directed monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) (25, 37) and to inhibition by soluble forms of CD4 (8). We and others have demonstrated that neutralization sensitivity develops concomitantly with adaptation of primary isolates to persistent growth in established T-cell lines (24, 37). By studying pedigreed PI and TCLA viruses (168P and 168C, respectively), we have shown that adaptation renders the TCLA virus sensitive not only to rgp120 vaccine sera and CD4 immunoadhesin but also to MAbs directed to the V3 loop of gp120 (37). However, the basis for this increase in neutralization sensitivity remains unclear.In this report, we explore the relationship between neutralization sensitivity and coreceptor utilization, especially with regard to changes that accompany adaptation. We examined neutralization sensitivity of the well-characterized SI primary isolate 168P under experimental conditions where infection can be directed via either the CXCR4 or the CCR5 pathway. The pedigreed TCLA derivative 168C utilizes only CXCR4 and was sensitive to neutralization by the panel of V3-directed MAbs used in these assays. However, the primary isolate 168P remained refractory to neutralization regardless of coreceptor pathway taken. Our findings suggest that envelope protein structure, and not coreceptor utilization, is the primary determinant of differential neutralization sensitivity in PI and TCLA viruses.

Coreceptor utilization by pedigreed PI and TCLA viruses.

Cross-sectional surveys of coreceptor use have shown that primary SI isolates generally utilize CXCR4 and CCR5 coreceptors, whereas unrelated laboratory-adapted isolates utilize only CXCR4 (1, 6, 7, 10–12, 14, 33, 38). We wished to confirm this trend in a longitudinal study of adaptation. We previously described the adaptation of the SI primary isolate 168P to persistent growth in the FDA/H9 T-cell line and the concomitant development of neutralization sensitivity in the resulting TCLA virus 168C (37). In the present study, the ability of these pedigreed viruses to utilize specific coreceptors was tested by infection of U87 human glioma cell lines expressing CD4 (U87-CD4) and the specific coreceptor (19).For this assay, virus stocks were prepared from cell culture supernatants of phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-stimulated peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) (168P) or FDA/H9 cells (168C) and standardized to yield a submaximal number of foci of infection on U87-CD4-CXCR4 cells (approximately 100 to 200 foci/96-well microplate culture). To confirm coreceptor specificity, in some assays CCR5 chemokines (each at 500 ng/ml) were added to cells 1 h prior to infection. After 2 days of incubation, cell monolayers were fixed with methanol-acetone and immunochemically stained with HIV immunoglobulin (HIVIG) (29), anti-human ABC kit (Biomeda Corp.), and diaminobenzidine substrate.Figure ​Figure11 confirms the ability of the SI 168P virus to utilize both CXCR4 and CCR5 and the subsequent loss of this latter specificity in the 168C TCLA virus. Infection was dependent on coreceptor expression, and both PI and TCLA viruses could also utilize CCR3 (data not presented). Open in a separate windowFIG. 1Coreceptor utilization by pedigreed PI and TCLA 168 viruses. U87-CD4 cell lines expressing CXCR4 (▪) or CCR5 () were used to define the ability of 168P and 168C viruses to utilize the respective coreceptor. CCR5 utilization was further tested by the addition to U87-CD4-CCR5 cells of CCR5-specific chemokines (RANTES, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β; R&D Systems) (□). For details, see text. ∗, no foci were observed.In keeping with the determined coreceptor specificity, infection could be blocked by addition of coreceptor-specific ligands. Thus, 168P virus infection of CCR5-expressing cells was blocked by the CCR5-specific ligands RANTES, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β (1, 6, 10–12) (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). Similarly, infection of CXCR4-expressing U87-CD4 cells by either virus could be blocked by the CXCR4-specific chemokine ligand SDF-1 (3, 27) (data not presented).

Coreceptor pathway and neutralization sensitivity.

In previous work, we demonstrated that the PI 168P virus is refractory to neutralization by HIV MN gp120 vaccine sera and by several well-characterized V3-directed murine MAbs which strongly neutralize infectivity of the TCLA 168C virus (37). In the present study, we extended the panel of MAbs to include two V3-directed human MAbs, 257-D and 268-D (17). These well-characterized human MAbs recognize core epitopes at the crown of the V3 loop of gp120 (KRIHI and HIGPGR, respectively), linear sequences known to be present in both 168P and 168C envelope proteins (37). These epitope predictions were confirmed by gp120 capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (26) which demonstrated equal binding to envelope protein in detergent-solubilized 168P and 168C virions (data not presented). Sensitivity to neutralization by these human MAbs was determined in a standard assay using PHA-activated PBLs (37). MAbs 257-D and 268-D were found to potently neutralize 168C but fail to neutralize 168P (Fig. ​(Fig.2).2). This pattern of neutralization sensitivity is similar to that previously described for the V3-directed murine MAb 50.1 (30, 36, 37). Open in a separate windowFIG. 2Neutralization sensitivity of 168 viruses in PBL culture. Virus neutralization assays in PHA-stimulated PBL culture were performed as previously described (37). 168P (○, •) and 168C (□, ▪) virus stocks were standardized to yield submaximal extents of virus spread during the 5-day infection. CCR5-specific chemokines (•, ▪) were added as described for Fig. ​Fig.1.1. The V3-directed MAbs are indicated. p24 antigen was determined by p24 antigen capture ELISA (SAIC Frederick) and was normalized to infected cell control values (168P, 190 ng/ml [170 ng/ml with chemokines]; 168C, 36 ng/ml [33 ng/ml with chemokines]).To examine whether sensitivity to neutralization was affected by the coreceptor pathway utilized in infection of PBLs, we used inhibitory concentrations of CCR5-specific chemokine ligands RANTES, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β in order to restrict infection to the CXCR4 pathway. Addition of these chemokines to the PBL cultures did not affect virus growth, nor did it affect sensitivity to neutralization by the V3-directed human MAbs (Fig. ​(Fig.2).2). To the extent that CCR5 blockade was complete, these results suggest that the simple availability of the CCR5 pathway is not a factor in the resistance of PI viruses to neutralization.To strengthen this conclusion, we examined neutralization sensitivity in human U87-CD4 cell lines expressing only CXCR4 or CCR5. Using this method, we confirmed that the SI 168P virus remained refractory to neutralization by human MAbs 257-D and 268-D as well as by the murine MAb 50.1, regardless of whether infection occurred via CXCR4 or CCR5 (Fig. ​(Fig.3).3). These results suggest that availability of the CCR5 pathway is not a primary determinant for the resistance of PI viruses to neutralization. The TCLA 168C virus utilized CXCR4 only and was sensitive to neutralization. Open in a separate windowFIG. 3Neutralization sensitivity of 168 viruses in U87-CD4 cell lines expressing CCR5 or CXCR4 coreceptor. 168P (○, •) and 168C (▪) viruses were used to infect U87-CD4 cell lines expressing CXCR4 (•, ▪) or CCR5 (○) as described for Fig. ​Fig.1.1. The V3-directed MAbs were incubated with virus for 1 h prior to infection.

Molecularly cloned PI and TCLA envelope genes.

To understand better the changes that accompany adaptation and those that determine coreceptor utilization and neutralization sensitivity, we molecularly cloned the envelope genes of the 168P and 168C viruses. High-fidelity XL PCR (rTth and Vent DNA polymerases; PE Applied Biosystems) and primers envA and envN (15) were used to amplify a 3.1-kb region of proviral DNA encoding the rev and envelope genes. PCR products were isolated by unidirectional T/A cloning in the eucaryotic expression vector pCR3.1-Uni (Invitrogen). Expression in pCR3.1-Uni is driven by the cytomegalovirus immediate-early promoter. Multiple clones were isolated from each virus, and transient transfection studies in COS-7 cells confirmed the surface expression and fusion competence of all clones tested (data not presented).DNA sequence analysis demonstrated that all 168C molecular clones analyzed encoded the three adaptation-associated amino acid changes previously identified by PCR sequencing of the 168C virus population (V2, I166R; C2, I282N; and V3, G318R) (37). Two molecular clones of each 168P and 168C envelope were subjected to complete DNA sequence analysis (GenBank accession no. {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"AF035532","term_id":"2827997","term_text":"AF035532"}}AF035532 to {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"AF035534","term_id":"2828001","term_text":"AF035534"}}AF035534). Molecular clones 168C23 and 168C60 were identical throughout the envelope gene. Molecular clones 168P5 and 168P23 differed from each other and from the previously determined sequence at four to five positions distinct from those associated with adaptation. These scattered changes within the primary virus quasispecies are considered inconsequential at the present level of analysis; the significance of the three adaptation-associated changes is under separate investigation.Functional analysis of these molecularly cloned envelope genes was performed by incorporation of the molecularly cloned envelope protein into pseudotyped HIV virions. We used an envelope-defective provirus derived from the molecularly cloned NL4-3 provirus (kindly provided by I. S. Y. Chen, University of California, Los Angeles). The pNLthyΔBgl provirus (28) contains a BglII-BglII deletion within the envelope gene and a substitution of the viral nef gene with a cDNA encoding the murine Thy1.2 cell surface protein. The simian virus 40 ori was subsequently introduced into the plasmid to generate pSVNLthyΔBgl (27a). Cotransfection of COS-7 cells (16, 20) with pSVNLthyΔBgl provirus and the envelope expression plasmid resulted in the production of pseudotyped HIV virions. Culture supernatants were harvested 3 days posttransfection, filtered, and used to infect U87-CD4 cell lines expressing coreceptor. Cells infected by virions bearing the complementing envelope protein were identified by immunostaining for murine Thy1.2 or HIV proteins.As anticipated, the molecularly cloned envelope proteins recapitulated the coreceptor specificity of the parental virus population (see the legend to Fig. ​Fig.4).4). Pseudotyped virions containing 168C60 were able to infect only U87-CD4 cells expressing CXCR4, while virions containing 168P23 envelope were able to infect U87-CD4 cells expressing either CCR5 or CXCR4. Thus, the viral envelope protein appears to be the major, if not sole, determinant of viral coreceptor use. These findings also indicate that dual coreceptor use is a direct property of the envelope protein complex and not a result of a mixture of distinct envelope proteins in the SI virus population. This conclusion is corroborated by the failure of CCR5-specific chemokine ligands to diminish 168P virus infection in PBL culture (Fig. ​(Fig.22).Open in a separate windowFIG. 4Neutralization sensitivity of pseudotyped virions in U87-CD4 cell lines expressing CCR5 or CXCR4 coreceptor. Pseudotyped virions were derived by cotransfection of COS-7 cells with pSVNLthyΔBgl provirus and plasmid expressing 168P23 (○, •) or 168C60 (▪) envelope protein. Virion preparations were incubated with U87-CD4 cell lines expressing CXCR4 (•, ▪) or CCR5 (○) as described for Fig. ​Fig.1;1; V3-directed MAbs were added as indicated. The number of foci was normalized to control values (60 to 100 foci/well for U87-CD4-CXCR4 cells; 10 foci/well for U87-CD4-CCR5 cells). ∗, no foci were observed.Finally, we wished to determine the neutralization sensitivity of pseudotyped virions containing the molecularly cloned 168P23 and 168C60 envelope proteins and to confirm that coreceptor pathway is not a primary determinant of neutralization sensitivity. We found that infection of U87-CD4-CXCR4 cells by pseudotyped virions containing 168C60 envelope protein was sensitive to neutralization by MAbs 257-D, 268-D, and 50.1 at concentrations comparable to those determined in assays using 168C virus (Fig. ​(Fig.4).4). Pseudotyped virions containing 168P23 envelope protein remained refractory to neutralization by all three V3-directed MAbs, regardless of the coreceptor expressed by the U87-CD4 cell line. In summary, we examined the relationship between coreceptor utilization and sensitivity to neutralization by V3-directed MAbs. The observed dichotomy in the sensitivity to neutralization of PI and TCLA viruses had suggested a discrete difference between these viruses, and we tested one hypothesis: that PI viruses are refractory to neutralization as a result of their unique ability to utilize the CCR5 coreceptor. We examined neutralization sensitivity of a well-characterized SI primary isolate under experimental conditions wherein the virus was forced to utilize either CCR5 or CXCR4 for infection. We showed that coreceptor pathway is not a direct determinant of neutralization sensitivity. The primary virus envelope protein remained refractory to neutralization by V3-directed MAbs regardless of the coreceptor pathway utilized. Similarly, coreceptor utilization did not affect neutralization sensitivity by soluble CD4 (34) or HIVIG (data not presented).In discarding the otherwise attractive hypothesis that PI viruses escape neutralization through their unique ability to utilize CCR5, we are left to consider the as yet undefined structural differences between the envelope protein complex of PI and TCLA viruses. Several studies have suggested that critical determinants in the envelope protein of PI viruses are less accessible than those of TCLA viruses and that it is this differential access that determines neutralization sensitivity (reviewed in reference 25). By contrast, our studies have indicated similar binding of V3-directed MAbs to PBLs infected with neutralization-resistant isolate 168P or neutralization-sensitive isolate 168C (37). Thus, the basis for the differential neutralization sensitivity of PI and TCLA viruses remains unresolved.Our present studies also do not address whether changes in coreceptor utilization and/or neutralization sensitivity are necessarily linked as a consequence of adaptation. The analysis of independently derived PI and TCLA viruses may allow further separation of these viral phenotypes. Subsequent dissection of the amino acid changes that distinguish pedigreed PI and TCLA envelope proteins will help to define the structural bases underlying the changes that accompany adaptation.     

Common Themes of Antibody Maturation to Simian Immunodeficiency Virus, Simian-Human Immunodeficiency Virus, and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infections

Characterization of virus-specific immune responses to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) is important to understanding the early virus-host interactions that may determine the course of virus infection and disease. Using a comprehensive panel of serological assays, we have previously demonstrated a complex and lengthy maturation of virus-specific antibody responses elicited by attenuated strains of SIV that was closely associated with the development of protective immunity. In the present study, we expand these analyses to address several questions regarding the nature of the virus-specific antibody responses to pathogenic SIV, SIV/HIV-1 (SHIV), and HIV-1 infections. The results demonstrate for the first time a common theme of antibody maturation to SIV, SHIV, and HIV-1 infections that is characterized by ongoing changes in antibody titer, conformational dependence, and antibody avidity during the first 6 to 10 months following virus infection. We demonstrate that this gradual evolution of virus-specific antibody responses is independent of the levels of virus replication and the pathogenicity of the infection viral strain. While the serological assays used in these studies were useful in discriminating between protective and nonprotective antibody responses during evaluation of vaccine efficacy with attenuated SIV, these same assays do not distinguish the clinical outcome of infection in pathogenic SIV, SHIV, or HIV-1 infections. These results likely reflect differences in the immune mechanisms involved in mediating protection from virus challenge compared to those that control an established viral infection, and they suggest that additional characteristics of both humoral and cellular responses evolve during this early immune maturation.