Phage regulatory circuits and virulence gene expression

In many pathogenic bacteria, genes that encode virulence factors are located in the genomes of prophages. Clearly bacteriophages are important vectors for disseminating virulence genes, but, in addition, do phage regulatory circuits contribute to expression of these genes? Phages of the lambda family that have genes encoding Shiga toxin are found in certain pathogenic Escherichia coli (known as Shiga toxin producing E. coli) and the filamentous phage CTXphi, that carries genes encoding cholera toxin (CTX), is found in Vibrio cholerae. Both the lambda and CTXphi phages have repressor systems that maintain their respective prophages in a quiescent state, and in both types of prophages this repressed state is abolished when the host cell SOS response is activated. In the lambda type of prophages, only binding of the phage-encoded repressor is involved in repression and this repressor ultimately controls Shiga toxin production and/or release. In the CTXphi prophage, binding of LexA, the bacterial regulator of SOS, in addition to binding of the repressor is involved in repression; the repressor has only limited control over CTX production and has no influence on its release.     

The Vibrio cholerae O139 Calcutta bacteriophage CTXphi is infectious and encodes a novel repressor.

CTXphi is a lysogenic, filamentous bacteriophage. Its genome includes the genes encoding cholera toxin (ctxAB), one of the principal virulence factors of Vibrio cholerae; consequently, nonpathogenic strains of V. cholerae can be converted into toxigenic strains by CTXphi infection. O139 Calcutta strains of V. cholerae, which were linked to cholera outbreaks in Calcutta, India, in 1996, are novel pathogenic strains that carry two distinct CTX prophages integrated in tandem: CTX(ET), the prophage previously characterized within El Tor strains, and a new CTX Calcutta prophage (CTX(calc)). We found that the CTX(calc) prophage gives rise to infectious virions; thus, CTX(ET)phi is no longer the only known vector for transmission of ctxAB. The most functionally significant differences between the nucleotide sequences of CTX(calc)phi and CTX(ET)phi are located within the phages' repressor genes (rstR(calc) and rstR(ET), respectively) and their RstR operators. RstR(calc) is a novel, allele-specific repressor that regulates replication of CTX(calc)phi by inhibiting the activity of the rstA(calc) promoter. RstR(calc) has no inhibitory effect upon the classical and El Tor rstA promoters, which are instead regulated by their cognate RstRs. Consequently, production of RstR(calc) renders a CTX(calc) lysogen immune to superinfection by CTX(calc)phi but susceptible (heteroimmune) to infection by CTX(ET)phi. Analysis of the prophage arrays generated by sequentially integrated CTX phages revealed that pathogenic V. cholerae O139 Calcutta probably arose via infection of an O139 CTX(ET)phi lysogen by CTX(calc)phi.     

The CTXphi repressor RstR binds DNA cooperatively to form tetrameric repressor-operator complexes

CTX is a filamentous bacteriophage that encodes cholera toxin and integrates into the Vibrio cholerae genome to form stable lysogens. In CTX lysogens, gene expression originating from the rstA phage promoter is repressed by the phage-encoded repressor RstR. The N-terminal region of RstR contains a helix-turn-helix DNA-binding element similar to the helix-turn-helix of the cI/Cro family of phage repressors, whereas the short C-terminal region is unrelated to the oligomerization domain of cI repressor. Purified His-tagged RstR bound to three extended 50-bp operator sites in the rstA promoter region. Each of the RstR footprints exhibited a characteristic staggered pattern of DNase I-accessible regions that suggested RstR binds DNA as a dimer-of-dimers. In gel permeation chromatography and cross-linking experiments, RstR oligomerized to form dimers and tetramers. RstR was shown to be tetrameric when bound to operator DNA by performing mobility shift experiments with mixtures of RstR and a lengthened active variant of RstR. Binding of RstR to the high affinity O1 site could be fit to a cooperative model of operator binding in which two RstR dimers associate to form tetrameric RstR-operator complexes. The binding of RstR dimers to the left or right halves of O1 operator DNA was not observed in mobility shift assays. These observations support a model in which protein-protein contacts between neighboring RstR dimers contribute to strong operator binding.     

The antirepressor needed for induction of linear plasmid-prophage N15 belongs to the SOS regulon

The physiological conditions and molecular interactions that control phage production have been studied in only a few families of temperate phages. We investigated the mechanisms that regulate activation of lytic development in lysogens of coliphage N15, a prophage that is not integrated into the host chromosome but exists as a linear plasmid with covalently closed ends. We identified the N15 antirepressor gene, antC, and showed that its product binds to and acts against the main phage repressor, CB. LexA binds to and represses the promoter of antC. Mitomycin C-stimulated N15 induction required RecA-dependent autocleavage of LexA and expression of AntC protein. Thus, a cellular repressor whose activity is regulated by DNA damage controls N15 prophage induction.     

Constitutive expression of the SOS response in recA718 mutants of Escherichia coli requires amplification of RecA718 protein.

In recA718 lexA+ strains of Escherichia coli, induction of the SOS response requires DNA damage. This implies that RecA718 protein, like RecA+ protein, must be converted, by a process initiated by the damage, to an activated form (RecA) to promote cleavage of LexA, the cellular repressor of SOS genes. However, when LexA repressor activity was abolished by a lexA-defective mutation [lexA(Def)], strains carrying the recA718 gene (but not recA+) showed strong SOS mutator activity and were able to undergo stable DNA replication in the absence of DNA damage (two SOS functions known to require RecA activity even when cleavage of LexA is not necessary). lambda lysogens of recA718 lexA(Def) strains exhibited mass induction of prophage, indicative of constitutive ability to cleave lambda repressor. When the cloned recA718 allele was present in a lexA+ strain on a plasmid, SOS mutator activity and beta-galactosidase synthesis under LexA control were expressed in proportion to the plasmid copy number. We conclude that RecA718 is capable of becoming activated without DNA damage for cleavage of LexA and lambda repressor, but only if it is amplified above its base-line level in lexA+ strains. At amplified levels, RecA718 was also constitutively activated for its roles in SOS mutagenesis and stable DNA replication. The nucleotide sequence of recA718 reveals two base substitutions relative to the recA+ sequence. We propose that the first allows the protein to become activated constitutively, whereas the second partially suppresses this capability.     

Regulation, replication, and integration functions of the Vibrio cholerae CTXφ are encoded by region RS2

CTXφ is a filamentous phage that encodes cholera toxin, one of the principal virulence factors of Vibrio cholerae . CTXφ is unusual among filamentous phages because it can either replicate as a plasmid or integrate into the V. cholerae chromosome at a specific site. The CTXφ genome has two regions, the 'core' and RS2. Integrated CTXφ is frequently flanked by an element known as RS1 which is related to RS2. The nucleotide sequences of RS2 and RS1 were determined. These related elements contain three nearly identical open reading frames (ORFs), which in RS2 were designated rstR , rstA2 and rstB2 . RS1 contains an additional ORF designated rstC . Functional analyses indicate that rstA2 is required for CTXφ replication and rstB2 is required for CTXφ integration. The amino terminus of RstR is similar to the amino termini of other phage-encoded repressors, and RstR represses the expression of rstA2 . Although genes with related functions are clustered in the genome of CTXφ in a way similar to those for other filamentous phages, the CTXφ RS2-encoded gene products mediating replication, integration and repression appear to be novel.     

Phage-borne factors and host LexA regulate the lytic switch in phage GIL01

The Bacillus thuringiensis temperate phage GIL01 does not integrate into the host chromosome but exists stably as an independent linear replicon within the cell. Similar to that of the lambdoid prophages, the lytic cycle of GIL01 is induced as part of the cellular SOS response to DNA damage. However, no CI-like maintenance repressor has been detected in the phage genome, suggesting that GIL01 uses a novel mechanism to maintain lysogeny. To gain insights into the GIL01 regulatory circuit, we isolated and characterized a set of 17 clear plaque (cp) mutants that are unable to lysogenize. Two phage-encoded proteins, gp1 and gp7, are required for stable lysogen formation. Analysis of cp mutants also identified a 14-bp palindromic dinBox1 sequence within the P1-P2 promoter region that resembles the known LexA-binding site of Gram-positive bacteria. Mutations at conserved positions in dinBox1 result in a cp phenotype. Genomic analysis identified a total of three dinBox sites within GIL01 promoter regions. To investigate the possibility that the host LexA regulates GIL01, phage induction was measured in a host carrying a noncleavable lexA (Ind(-)) mutation. GIL01 formed stable lysogens in this host, but lytic growth could not be induced by treatment with mitomycin C. Also, mitomycin C induced β-galactosidase expression from GIL01-lacZ promoter fusions, and induction was similarly blocked in the lexA (Ind(-)) mutant host. These data support a model in which host LexA binds to dinBox sequences in GIL01, repressing phage gene expression during lysogeny and providing the switch necessary to enter lytic development.     

The SOS regulatory system: control of its state by the level of RecA protease

Our current understanding of the SOS regulatory system suggests that it can exist in two extreme states: in the repressed state, LexA protein is active, and it represses a particular set of genes called SOS genes. In the induced state, which results from various impairments to DNA replication, LexA repressor is cleaved by the specific protease activity of the RecA protein; in consequence, the SOS genes are derepressed and they express various functions that are believed to aid cell survival in induced cells. Since high levels of RecA protease activity turn on this system, it seems plausible that the level of protease activity will also control the transitions between the two states of the system. In order to assess the in vivo level of protease activity, antibody techniques were used to study the stability of LexA repressor during various phases of the SOS regulatory cycle. Repressor was reasonably stable in the repressed state, but it was degraded within a few minutes after an inducing treatment. Cleavage depended upon the RecA protease activity and resulted in the same products as seen in vitro. Cleavage preceded, and did not depend upon, derepression of any SOS gene. During the transition to the repressed state, LexA repressor became increasingly stable with time, suggesting that as DNA damage was repaired the level of protease declined. This decline depended upon derepression of the regulatory system, consistent with the belief that an inducing signal, resulting from DNA damage, reversibly activates the RecA protease and is removed by the action of one or more SOS functions. At low levels of DNA damage, a subinduced state was observed in which repressor level was reduced by a low level of cleavage. These data indicate that the level of RecA protease activity controls the state of the system and the transitions between its two states.     

The SOS system

In the bacterium Escherichia coli DNA damaging treatments such as ultraviolet or ionizing radiation induce a set of functions called collectively the SOS response, reviewed here. The regulation of the SOS response involves a repressor, the LexA protein, and an inducer, the RecA protein. After DNA damage an effector molecule is produced--possibly single stranded DNA--which activates the RecA protein to a form capable of catalysing proteolytic cleavage of LexA. The repressors of certain temperate prophages are cleaved under the same conditions, resulting in lysogenic induction. SOS functions are involved in DNA repair and mutagenesis, in cell division inhibition, in recovery of normal physiological conditions after the DNA damage is repaired, and possibly in cell death when DNA damage is too extensive. The SOS response also includes several chromosomal genes of unknown function, a number of plasmid encoded genes (bacteriocins, mutagenesis), and lysogenic induction of certain prophages. DNA damaging treatments seem to induce DNA repair and mutagenic activities and proviral development in many species, including mammalian cells. In general, substances which are genotoxic to higher eukaryotes induce the SOS response in bacteria. This correlation is the basis of the numerous bacterial tests for genotoxicity and carcinogenicity.     

Constitutive and UV-mediated activation of RecA protein: combined effects of recA441 and recF143 mutations and of addition of nucleosides and adenine.

The recF143 mutant of Escherichia coli is deficient in certain functions that also require the RecA protein: cell survival after DNA damage, some pathways of genetic recombination, and induction of SOS genes and temperate bacteriophage through cleavage of the LexA and phage repressors. To characterize the role of RecF in SOS induction and RecA activation, we determined the effects of the recF143 mutation on the rate of RecA-promoted cleavage of LexA, the repressor of the SOS genes. We show that RecA activation following UV irradiation is delayed by recF143 and that RecF is specifically involved in the SOS induction pathway that requires DNA replication. At 32 degrees C, the recA441 mutation partially suppresses the defect of recF mutants in inducing the SOS system in response to UV irradiation (A. Thomas and R. G. Lloyd, J. Gen. Microbiol. 129:681-686, 1983; M. R. Volkert, L. J. Margossian, and A. J. Clark, J. Bacteriol. 160:702-705, 1984); we find that this suppression occurs at the earliest detectable phase of LexA cleavage and does not require protein synthesis. Our results support the idea that following UV irradiation, RecF enhances the activation of RecA into a form that promotes LexA cleavage (A. Thomas and R. G. Lloyd, J. Gen. Microbiol. 129:681-686, 1983; M. V. V. S. Madiraju, A. Templin, and A. J. Clark, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:6592-6596, 1988). In contrast to the constitutive activation phenotype of the recA441 mutant, the recA441-mediated suppression of recF is not affected by adenine and nucleosides. We also find that wild-type RecA protein is somewhat activated by adenine in the absence of DNA damage.     

Nature of the SOS-inducing signal in Escherichia coli. The involvement of DNA replication

The SOS genes of Escherichia coli, which include many DNA repair genes, are induced by DNA damage. Although the central biochemical event in induction, activation of RecA protein through binding of single-stranded DNA and ATP to promote cleavage of the LexA repressor, is known, the cellular event that provides this activation following DNA damage has not been well understood. We provide evidence here that the major pathway of induction after damage by a typical agent, ultraviolet light, requires an active replication fork; this result supports the model that DNA replication leaves gaps where elongation stops at damage-induced lesions, and thus provides the single-stranded DNA that activates RecA protein. In order to detect quantitatively the immediate product of the inducing signal, activated RecA protein, we have designed an assay to measure the rate of disappearance of intact LexA repressor. With this assay, we have studied the early phase of the induction process. LexA cleavage is detectable within minutes after DNA damage and occurs in the absence of protein synthesis. By following the reaccumulation of LexA in the cell, we detect repair of DNA and the disappearance of the inducing signal. Using this assay, we have measured the LexA content of wild-type and various mutant cells, characterized the kinetics and conditions for development of the inducing signal after various inducing treatments and, finally, have shown the requirement for DNA replication in SOS induction by ultraviolet light.     

Recombination between chloroplast DNAs does not occur in sexual crosses of Oenothera

Summary Induction of the SOS genes is required for efficient repair of damaged DNA in Escherichia coli. SOS induction by nalidixic acid or oxolinic acid, two inhibitors of DNA gyrase, requires the RecBC enzyme of E. coli. We report here that the nuclease activity of RecBC enzyme is not needed for SOS induction by these agents. We suggest that the unwinding activity of RecBC enzyme produces single-stranded DNA which activates the RecA protein to stimulate LexA repressor cleavage and SOS induction.