Chromatin and histones in mealy bug cell explants: activation and decondensation of facultative heterochromatin by a synthetic polyanion

In spermatogonial cells of the mealy bug, Planococcus citri, at interphase the five maternal chromosomes appear as diffuse euchromatin and the five paternal chromosomes are heterochromatic, genetically inactive, and incorporate tritiated uridine into RNA at a diminished rate. Testes squashes were treated with 2–10 mg/ml of the polyanion, polystyrene sulfonate (PSS). The gonial cell nuclei decondensed and after 15 minutes they became uniformly granular and similar in appearance to wholly euchromatic nuclei. When testis expiants were incubated with PSS (2–10 mg/ml) for from 15 to 120 minutes, all stages of deheterochromatization were recovered. The Feulgen reaction revealed that the uniform granules contained DNA; methyl-green-thionin staining indicated that the nucleolus contained RNA. When tritiated uridine was added after 15 minutes of PSS and then incubation continued, autoradiography revealed incorporation into euchromatin and decondensing heterochromatin. Incorporation of uridine increased with dosage of PSS up to 4 mg/ml. PSS (20 mg/ml) was toxic to the cells: They incorporated no uridine and were badly damaged. RNAase treated controls were also devoid of label.—PSS treated cells showed a negative alkaline-fast-green reaction for histone. In vitro a complex was formed between calf thymus histone and PSS which was soluble only above pH 8.5, but not separable on a Dowex acetate ion exchange column. These findings suggest that, probably by disrupting the structure of the DNA-histone complex, polystyrene sulfonate brings about structural decondensation of heterochromatin and enables it (and euchromatin) to incorporate tritiated uridine into RNA at an increased rate.     

Histone modifications and nuclear architecture: a review.

Epigenetic modifications, such as acetylation, phosphorylation, methylation, ubiquitination, and ADP ribosylation, of the highly conserved core histones, H2A, H2B, H3, and H4, influence the genetic potential of DNA. The enormous regulatory potential of histone modification is illustrated in the vast array of epigenetic markers found throughout the genome. More than the other types of histone modification, acetylation and methylation of specific lysine residues on N-terminal histone tails are fundamental for the formation of chromatin domains, such as euchromatin, and facultative and constitutive heterochromatin. In addition, the modification of histones can cause a region of chromatin to undergo nuclear compartmentalization and, as such, specific epigenetic markers are non-randomly distributed within interphase nuclei. In this review, we summarize the principles behind epigenetic compartmentalization and the functional consequences of chromatin arrangement within interphase nuclei.     

Histone acetylation and heterochromatin content of cultured Peromyscus cells

In order to explore the relationship between unacetylated arginine-rich histones and condensed chromatin structure, the extent of histone acetylation was examined in cultured cell lines derived from three species of deer mice. These species differ considerably in their genomic content of heterochromatin but contain essentially the same euchromatin content. Cells of Peromyscus eremicus, containing 34–36% more constitutive heterochromatin than Peromyscus boylii or Peromyscus crinitus cells were found to contain 28–35% more unacetylated histone H4, 22–29% more unacetylated histone H3, and 18–22% more unacetylated histone H2B. This relationship between unacetylated histones and heterochromatin content was further explored by inducing hyperacetylation of P. eremicus and P. boylii histones through treatment of cells with 15 mM sodium butyrate for 24 h. It was found that the percentages of unacetylated histones H3 and H4 remaining after butyrate treatment were proportional to the amount of constitutive heterochromatin in the genome. These data support the concept that a small core of histones in constitutive heterochromatin is inaccessible to acetylation. It was also found that the acetylated state of isolated histones was sensitive to the method of histone extraction. Thus concern must be given to preparative procedures when studying histone acetylation in order to minimize these acetate losses.     

Histone H2A subfractions and their phosphorylation in cultured Peromyscus cells

Patterns of histone phosphorylation and histone H2A subfractionation have been compared in cultured cell lines from two species of deer mice, Peromyscus eremicus and Peromyscus boylii, which differ considerably in their content of heterochromatin but which contain essentially the same euchromatin content. DNA measurements by flow microfluorometry indicated that P. eremicus cells contained 34.2% more DNA than P. boylii cells, and C-band chromosome analysis indicated that the extra DNA in P. eremicus was present as constitutive heterochromatin. Subfraction of histone H2A by acid-urea polyacrylamide preparative gel electrophoresis in the presence of non-ionic detergent showed that each cell line contained two H2A subfractions. Incorporation of ³²PO₄ into these histones indicated that the steady state phosphorylation of the two H2A subfractions was not the same, the more hydrophobic H2A being greater than two times more phosphorylated than the less hydrophobic H2A in both cell lines. A comparison of the two cell lines indicated that the cell line with 34.2% greater constitutive heterochromatin contained a similar excess (29%) in its ratio of the more highly phosphorylated, more hydrophobic H2A subfraction to the less hydrophobic H2A subfraction. It is suggested that this enrichment of the more highly phosphorylated, more hydrophobic H2A subfraction may be related to the amount of constitutive heterochromatin present in the genome.     

The inheritance of histone modifications depends upon the location in the chromosome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Histone modifications are important epigenetic features of chromatin that must be replicated faithfully. However, the molecular mechanisms required to duplicate and maintain histone modification patterns in chromatin remain to be determined. Here, we show that the introduction of histone modifications into newly deposited nucleosomes depends upon their location in the chromosome. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, newly deposited nucleosomes consisting of newly synthesized histone H3-H4 tetramers are distributed throughout the entire chromosome. Methylation of lysine 4 on histone H3 (H3-K4), a hallmark of euchromatin, is introduced into these newly deposited nucleosomes, regardless of whether the neighboring preexisting nucleosomes harbor the K4 mutation in histone H3. Furthermore, if the heterochromatin-binding protein Sir3 is unavailable during DNA replication, histone H3-K4 methylation is introduced onto newly deposited nucleosomes in telomeric heterochromatin. Thus, a conservative distribution model most accurately explains the inheritance of histone modifications because the location of histones within euchromatin or heterochromatin determines which histone modifications are introduced.     

3H-Actinomycin-D binding to mitotic chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster

The binding of ³H-AMD to the metaphase chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster has been analyzed after two different periods of exposure to photographic emulsion. The entirely heterochromatic Y chromosome was markedly less labelled than euchromatin and other heterochromatic regions. Moreover, the few grains present on the Y chromosome were clustered in two regions, one localized in the middle of Y^S and the other in the proximal third of Y^L. This labelling pattern is not affected by removing histones with a 2-hour treatment with 2N HCl. It is suggested that the specific underlabelling of the Y chromosome reflects a peculiar AT richness.     

Different types of plant chromatin associated with modified histones H3 and H4 and methylated DNA

Eukaryotic chromosomes are organized into two large and distinct domains, euchromatin and heterochromatin, which are cytologically characterized by different degrees of chromatin compaction during interphase/prophase and by post-synthesis modifications of histones and DNA methylation. Typically, heterochromatin remains condensed during the entire cell cycle whereas euchromatin is decondensed at interphase. However, a fraction of the euchromatin can also remain condensed during interphase and appears as early condensing prophase chromatin. 5S and 45S rDNA sites and telomere DNA were used to characterize these regions in metaphase and interphase nuclei. We investigated the chromosomal distribution of modified histones and methylated DNA in the early and late condensing prophase chromatin of two species with clear differentiation between these domains. Both species, Costus spiralis and Eleutherine bulbosa, additionally have a small amount of classical heterochromatin detected by CMA/DAPI staining. The distribution of H4 acetylated at lysine 5 (H4K5ac), H3 phosphorylated at serine 10 (H3S10ph), H3 dimethylated at lysine 4 or 9 (H3K4me2, H3K9me2), and 5-methylcytosine was compared in metaphase, prophase, and interphase cells by immunostaining with specific antibodies. In both species, the late condensing prophase chromatin was highly enriched in H4K5ac and H3K4me2 whereas the early condensing chromatin was very poor in these marks. H3K9me2 was apparently uniformly distributed along the chromosomes whereas the early condensing chromatin was slightly enriched in 5-methylcytosine. Signals of H3S10ph were restricted to the pericentromeric region of all chromosomes. Notably, none of these marks distinguished classical heterochromatin from the early condensing euchromatin. It is suggested that the early condensing chromatin is an intermediate type between classical heterochromatin and euchromatin.     

DNA-polymerase activity detected in situ

Summary DNA-polymerase activity during the cell cycle (S+G₂+M+C type) in antheridial filaments cells of Chara vulgaris was studied using the autoradiographic method. Incorporation of ³H-deoxytriphosphates (³H-dTPs) during the whole of interphase indicates, that the cell cycle is not accompanied by distinct changes in enzyme activity. Incorporation of ³H-dTPs was also observed in spermatids and in early stages of spermatogenesis. Intensity of ³H-dTPs incorporation during interphase and spermatogenesis is similar to the intensity of ³H-actinomycin D (³H-AMD) binding. Auxin (IAA) and kinetin stimulate both ³H-AMD binding and ³H-dTPs incorporation; benzyladenine does not affect any of these processes. The in situ autoradiographic method of detecting DNA-polymerase activity reveals availability of DNA template for the enzyme rather than DNA polymerase activity itself.     

Histone variants and histone modifications in chromatin fractions from heterochromatin-rich Peromyscus cells

In order to investigate the relationship between condensed heterochromatin and histone modification by acetylation, phosphorylation and amino acid variation, chromatin from cultured Peromyscus eremicus cells, containing 35% constitutive heterochromatin, was fractionated into heterochromatin-enriched and heterochromatin-depleted fractions. The constitutive heterochromatin content of these fractions was determined from satellite DNA content. The distribution of phosphorylated and acetylated histones and amino acid variants of histone H2A in these chromatin fractions was examined by gel electrophoresis. Fractionation of histones demonstrated that endogenous histone phosphatase activity was high in chromatin fractions and could not be inhibited sufficiently to allow accurate histone phosphorylation measurements. However, sodium butyrate did inhibit deacetylation activity in the fractions, allowing histone acetylation measurements to be made. It was found that the constitutive heterochromatin content of these fractions was proportional to both their unacetylated H4 content and their more-hydrophobic H2A content. These observations support, by direct measurement, earlier experiments (Exp cell res 111 (1978) 373; 125 (1980) 377; 132 (1981) 201) suggesting that constitutive heterochromatin is enriched in unacetylated arginine-rich histones, and in the more hydrophobic variant of histone H2A.     

H1 family histones in the nucleus. Control of binding and localization by the C-terminal domain

H1 histones bind to DNA as they enter and exit the nucleosome. H1 histones have a tripartite structure consisting of a short N-terminal domain, a highly conserved central globular domain, and a lysine-and arginine-rich C-terminal domain. The C-terminal domain comprises approximately half of the total amino acid content of the protein, is essential for the formation of compact chromatin structures, and contains the majority of the amino acid variations that define the individual histone H1 family members. This region contains several cell cycle-regulated phosphorylation sites and is thought to function through a charge-neutralization process, neutralizing the DNA phosphate backbone to allow chromatin compaction. In this study, we use fluorescence microscopy and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching to define the behavior of the individual histone H1 subtypes in vivo. We find that there are dramatic differences in the binding affinity of the individual histone H1 subtypes in vivo and differences in their preference for euchromatin and heterochromatin. Further, we show that subtype-specific properties originate with the C terminus and that the differences in histone H1 binding are not consistent with the relatively small changes in the net charge of the C-terminal domains.     

The effect of calmodulin and troponin-C on activities of homogeneous liver phosphoprotein phosphatases

The effect of calmodulin was determined on activities of two homogeneous liver phosphoprotein phosphatases with phosphorylase a and phosphorylated histones as substrates. Calmodulin in the absence or presence of calcium had no effect on the dephosphorylation of phosphorylase a by either phosphatases. However, calmodulin inhibited the dephosphorylation of histones catalyzed by both phosphatases. No difference was found whether the reactions were carried out in the absence or presence of calcium. The effect of calmodulin on histone dephosphorylation was variable depending on (i) the absence or presence of KCl and Mg²⁺, and (ii) the concentration of histone in the reaction mixture. In the presence of KCl and Mg²⁺ at a histone concentration of 0.1 mg/ml, calmodulin inhibited the enzyme activity. At 1 mg/ml histone, lower concentrations of calmodulin activated whereas higher concentrations of calmodulin inhibited the enzyme activity. Similar, but relatively less, effect was observed with troponin-C. In the absence of KCl and Mg²⁺, calmodulin as well as troponin-C activated the enzyme activity. The optimal concentration of calmodulin (or troponin-C) was approximately 30–50% of histone concentration in the reaction mixture. Calcium alone or with calmodulin (or troponin-C) had no additional effect on enzyme activities. DNA and RNA, two negatively charged nucleic acids, also showed similar effects on histone dephosphorylation. Depending on whether KCl and Mg²⁺ were absent or present in the reaction mixtures, both nucleic acids either activated or inhibited the dephosphorylation of histones.     

Sub-nuclear fractionation. II. Intranuclear compartmentation of transcription in vivo and in vitro

DNA-dependent RNA polymerase activities were measured in subnuclear fractions obtained from rat liver by the procedure described in the preceding paper [14]. Most of the total nuclear enzyme was recovered in a form bound to chromatin with only small amounts as free enzyme in the nucleoplasm. The multiple eukaryotic RNA polymerases were resolved according to the endogenous template to which they were bound and which they continue to transcribe in vitro. The A and B forms of the enzyme were distinguished from each other by their differential sensitivities to α-amanitin, exogenous native and denatured DNA, thermal denaturation at 45 °, Mg²⁺ and Mn² ions, high ionic strength and by the binding of ${}^{14}\text{C-methyl}\text{-γ-}\text{amanitin}$. RNA polymerase B (α-amanitin-sensitive) was exclusively recovered in the nucleoplasmic and euchromatin fractions. RNA polymerase A was recovered in the dispersed nucleolar as well as in heterochromatin. By assaying in the presence of α-amanitin subnuclear fractions that had been pre-incubated at 45 °C a third enzyme (form C) was located exclusively in heterochromatin fractions. Only the euchromatin associated RNA polymerase B was capable of initiating the synthesis of new RNA chains in vitro on endogenous template at low ionic strength. Raising the ionic strength abolished initiation but accelerated chain elongation by this form of enzyme.When nuclear RNA was labelled in vivo, newly made RNA turned over rapidly in the nucleoplasm but accumulated in the euchromatin + membrane fraction. RNA in the nucleolar fraction accumulated gradually after a lag period, whereas a significant amount of rapidly-labelled nuclear RNA was recovered in the heterochromatin fractions. The distribution of RNA labelled in vivo compared with that of RNA polymerase activities suggested that RNA synthesized in vivo is rapidly translocated from its site of synthesis to some other sites within the nucleus.     

The centromeric heterochromatin of Costus spiralis: poorly methylated and transiently acetylated during meiosis

The centromeric region of Costus spiralis is characteristically composed of a small heterochromatic DAPI(+) band flanked by a discrete decondensed region. High concentrations of serine 10 of histone H3 (H3S10ph) around the DAPI(+) band in pachytene chromosomes and the location of this heterochromatin at the chromosome region directed towards the poles during metaphase-anaphase I confirm its integration into the centromeric region. Antibodies against both typical components of euchromatin histones (histone H4 acetylated at lysine 5 (H4K5ac) and histone H3 dimethylated at lysine 4 (H3K4me2)) and heterochromatin (dimethylated lysine 9 of H3 (H3K9me2) and anti-5-methylcytosine (5-mC)) were used to characterize the centromeric chromatin of this species during meiosis. In pachytene chromosomes, the decondensed terminal euchromatin of the chromosome arms were seen to be richer in H4K5ac and H3K4me2 histones, while the more condensed proximal region was relatively stronger labeled with anti-H3K9me2 and anti-5-methylcytosine (5-mC). The centromeric region itself, including the DAPI(+) band, was poor in all of these chromatin modifications, but it was highly enriched in H4K5ac at pachytene. Before and after this stage, the centromeric region was poorly labeled with anti-H4K5ac. Hypomethylation and hyperacetylation of any kind of heterochromatin has rarely been reported, and it may be related to the dominant role of the centromere domain over the heterochromatin repeats.     

Histone H3 methylation patterns in Brassica nigra, Brassica juncea, and Brassica carinata species

Core histones are subjected to various post-translational modifications, and one of them, most intensively studied in plants, is the methylation of histone H3. In the majority of analyzed plant species, dimethylation of H3 at lysine 9 (H3K9me2) is detected in heterochromatin domains, whereas methylation of H3 at lysine 4 (H3K4me2) is detected in euchromatin domains. The distribution of H3K9me2 in the interphase nucleus seems to be correlated with genome size, chromatin organization, but also with tissue specificity. In this paper, we present the analysis of the pattern and level of histone H3 methylation for two allotetraploid and one diploid Brassica species. We have found that the pattern of H3K9me2 in interphase nuclei from root meristematic tissue is comparable within the analyzed species and includes both heterochromatin and euchromatin, but the level of modification differs not only among species but even among nuclei in the same phase of the cell cycle within one species. Moreover, the differences in the level of H3K9me2 are not directly coupled with DNA content in the nuclei and are probably tissue specific.     

Heterochromatin and histone phosphorylation

Histone phosphorylation and nuclear structure have been compared in cultured cell lines of two related species of deer mice, Peromyscus crinitus and Peromyscus eremicus, which differ greatly in their heterochromatin contents but which contain essentially the same euchromatin content. Flow microfluorometry measurements indicated that P. eremicus contained 36% more DNA than did P. crinitus, and C-band chromosome staining indicated that the extra DNA of P. eremicus existed as constitutive heterochromatin. Two striking differences in interphase nuclear structure were observed by electron microscopy. Peromyscus crinitus nuclei contained small clumps of heterochromatin and a loose, amorphous nucleolus, while P. eremicus nuclei contained large, dense clumps of heterochromatin and a densely structured, well defined, nucleolonema form of nucleolus. Incorporation of ³²PO₄ into histones indicated that the steady-state phosphorylation of H1 was identical in P. crinitus and P. eremicus cells. In contrast, the phosphorylation rate of H2a was 58% greater in the highly heterochromatic chromatin of P. eremicus cells than in the lesser heterochromatic chromatin of P. crinitus cells, suggesting an involvement of H2a phosphorylation in heterochromatin structure. It is suggested that the three histone phosphorylations related to cell growth (H1, H2a, and H3) may be associated with different levels of chromatin organization: H1 interphase phosphorylation with some submicroscopic (molecular) level of organization, H2a phosphorylation with a higher level of chromatin organization found in heterochromatin, and H3 and H1 superphosphorylation with the highest level of chromatin organization observed in condensed chromosomes.     

The Paf1 complex factors Leo1 and Paf1 promote local histone turnover to modulate chromatin states in fission yeast

The maintenance of open and repressed chromatin states is crucial for the regulation of gene expression. To study the genes involved in maintaining chromatin states, we generated a random mutant library in Schizosaccharomyces pombe and monitored the silencing of reporter genes inserted into the euchromatic region adjacent to the heterochromatic mating type locus. We show that Leo1–Paf1 [a subcomplex of the RNA polymerase II‐associated factor 1 complex (Paf1C)] is required to prevent the spreading of heterochromatin into euchromatin by mapping the heterochromatin mark H3K9me2 using high‐resolution genomewide ChIP (ChIP–exo). Loss of Leo1–Paf1 increases heterochromatin stability at several facultative heterochromatin loci in an RNAi‐independent manner. Instead, deletion of Leo1 decreases nucleosome turnover, leading to heterochromatin stabilization. Our data reveal that Leo1–Paf1 promotes chromatin state fluctuations by enhancing histone turnover.