Structural requirements for V2 vasopressin receptor proteolytic cleavage.

The ligand-induced proteolytic cleavage of the V2 vasopressin receptor transiently expressed in COS cells was investigated. After incubation of the cell membranes with a photoreactive ligand possessing full agonistic properties for V2 receptors, approximately 90% of the porcine and bovine V2 vasopressin receptors were cleaved in the upper part of transmembrane helix 2 at a heptapeptide sequence conserved in both vasopressin and oxytocin receptors. The oxytocin receptor was completely resistant to proteolysis after binding the same photoreactive ligand, which is only a partial agonist for this receptor. Chimeric V2/oxytocin receptors obtained by transfer of extracellular domains of the oxytocin receptor into the V2 receptor showed an increase in binding affinity for oxytocin versus vasopressin and a diminished cleavage. The proteolysis-resistant chimeric V2/oxytocin receptor, which contains the first three extracellular domains of the oxytocin receptor, stimulated cAMP accumulation to a larger extent in response to vasopressin than the wild-type receptor and showed impaired desensitization of the adenylate cyclase system. Our data indicate that the proteolytic cleavage of the V2 receptor requires a defined conformation, especially of the first two extracellular domains that is induced by agonist binding. Furthermore, the results suggest that the proteolytic V2 receptor cleavage might play a role in signal termination at elevated hormone concentrations.     

Regulation of the vasopressin V2 receptor by vasopressin in polarized renal collecting duct cells

Binding of arginine-vasopressin (AVP) to its V2 receptor (V2R) in the basolateral membrane of principal cells induces Aquaporin-2-mediated water reabsorption in the kidney. To study the regulation of the V2R by dDAVP in a proper model, a polarized renal cell line stably-expressing V2R-GFP was generated. Labeled AVP-binding studies revealed an equal basolateral vs. apical membrane distribution for V2R-GFP and endogenous V2R. In these cells, GFP-V2R was expressed in its mature form and localized for 75% in the basolateral membrane and for 25% to late endosomes/lysosomes. dDAVP caused a dose- and time-dependent internalization of V2R-GFP, which was completed within 1 h with 100 nM dDAVP, was prevented by coincubation with a V2R antagonist, and which reduced its half-life from 11.5 to 2.8 h. Semiquantification of the V2R-GFP colocalization with E-cadherin (basolateral membrane), early endosomal antigen-1 (EEA-1) and lysosome-associated membrane protein-2 (LAMP-2) in time revealed that most dDAVP-bound V2R was internalized via early endosomes to late endosomes/lysosomes, where it was degraded. The dDAVP-internalized V2R did not recycle to the basolateral membrane. In conclusion, we established the itinerary of the V2R in a polarized cell model that likely resembles the in vivo V2R localization and regulation by AVP to a great extent.     

Regulation of V2 vasopressin receptor degradation by agonist-promoted ubiquitination

The seven-transmembrane-spanning vasopressin V2 receptor (V2R) is a Gs-coupled receptor that is rapidly phosphorylated and internalized following stimulation with the agonist, arginine-vasopressin. Herein, we show that the V2R is ubiquitinated following agonist stimulation. V2R-ubiquitination is not observed in a beta-arrestin1,2 deleted mouse fibroblast cell line and is restored following introduction of beta-arrestin2, thus indicating that beta-arrestin2 is required for the ubiquitination of V2R. A mutant V2R (K268R) that is not ubiquitinated still activates Gs and internalizes with similar kinetics as the wild type receptor. Unstimulated wild type and K268R mutant receptors degrade at similar rates and have comparable half-lives of 217 +/- 17 and 245 +/- 29 min as determined by pulse-chase experiments. However, following agonist stimulation, the rate of receptor degradation for the wild type is enhanced (half-life of 69 +/- 19 min), whereas that of the mutant is only minimally affected (half-life of 188 +/- 11 min). These data suggest that V2R levels are regulated through at least two processes. In the absence of agonist stimulation, a slow degradative pathway operates that is independent of receptor ubiquitination. However, receptor stimulation leads to rapid beta-arrestin2-dependent ubiquitination of the receptor and increased degradation.     

The splice variant of the V2 vasopressin receptor adopts alternative topologies

The V2 receptor gene encodes two receptor variants by alternative splicing, the canonical V2 receptor (V2a receptor) and V2b. The V2b variant has an amino acid sequence identical to that of the V2a receptor up to the sixth transmembrane domain, but the V2b sequences corresponding to the putative seventh transmembrane domain and the carboxyl terminus are different from those of the V2a receptor. Here we investigate the topology and subcellular distribution of the V2b variant. We found that, in contrast to the V2a receptor, the V2b adopted two topologies: one with six transmembrane segments with the C-terminus on the extracellular side of the membrane and another with seven transmembrane segments with the C-terminus on the intracellular side, similar to typical G-protein-coupled receptors. Furthermore, we observed that both topological isoforms oligomerized with the V2a canonical receptor. Unlike the V2a receptor, V2b did not move to the plasma membrane, but it is retained in the ER--Golgi compartments. These findings indicate that the C-terminal sequence beyond the sixth transmembrane of the V2a is required for the stabilization of the seven-transmembrane topology of the receptor and is also essential for the trafficking of the receptor to the plasma membrane.     

Administration of oxytocin affects vasopressin V2 receptor and aquaporin-2 gene expression in the rat.

Oxytocin (OT) binds to the vasopressin V2 receptor (V2R) because of its structural similarity to arginine vasopressin (AVP). Though the affinity of OT for V2R is low, it is known that OT causes antidiuresis. To clarify the effect of OT as an agonist of V2R, we investigated the influence of acute elevation of plasma OT levels on the rat mRNA expression of V2R and aquaporin-2 (AQP2), the water channel regulated by V2R. The plasma OT level increased from 11.1+/-1.6 pg/ml to 331.0+/-67.9 pg/ml by 1 h after subcutaneousinjection of 20 microg OT. V2R mRNA expression decreased to 68.3+/-4.1% of the control at 3 h, and AQP2 mRNA expression increased to 239.3+/-26.8% of the control at 6 h. The plasma AVP level did not change significantly during the experiment. The influence of a subcutaneous injection of 20 microg OT on V2R and AQP2 mRNA expression is comparable to that of 10 microg AVP that we documented in the previous study. In conclusion, OT can downregulate V2R mRNA expression and upregulate AQP2 mRNA expression in the collecting duct as an agonist of the V2R like AVP.     

Desensitization of the human V2 vasopressin receptor. Homologous effects in the absence of heterologous desensitization.

Three main pathways have been implicated in desensitization of receptors that stimulate adenylylcyclase (AC): cAMP-mediated phosphorylation; cAMP-independent phosphorylation, and receptor internalization. Cell lines derived from the murine Ltk- cell were found useful in exploring the contribution of cAMP-dependent phosphorylation in V2 vasopressin receptor desensitization. The HTB-2 cell expresses the human V2 vasopressin receptor, introduced by transfection of human genomic DNA, and the prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) receptor, endogenous to the Ltk- cell. The A7 cell expresses the hamster beta 2-adrenoceptor, which undergoes the above-mentioned desensitization processes. Treatment of HTB-2 cells with arginine-vasopressin (AVP) had no effect on AC responsiveness to PGE1, but promoted desensitization of the AVP response. This was seen as a 5-6-fold right shift in the dose-response curves for AVP action (cAMP accumulation in intact cells and AC stimulation in homogenates and isolated membranes) and in a decrease in the maximum effect of AVP on these parameters. AVP treatment caused a decrease in cell surface receptors to approximately 75% of control without changes in KD, as determined by Scatchard analysis. When cAMP was increased by treatment with 10 microM PGE1 and isobutylmethylxanthine, desensitization of the PGE1 receptor was observed but not of the AVP receptor. In A7 cells the same treatment caused, as expected, a 3-fold right shift in the dose-response curve for AC stimulation by isoproterenol, indicating that L cells can mediate heterologous desensitization. These data demonstrate that the V2 vasopressin and the PGE1 receptors undergo homologous desensitization in the absence of cAMP-mediated phosphorylation and that this component is not required for vasopressin receptor internalization.     

Molecular dynamics of a vasopressin V2 receptor in a phospholipid bilayer membrane

Molecular dynamics simulations were carried out for a V2 receptor (V2R) model embedded in a dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC) bilayer. Both free and ligand-bound states of V2R were modeled. Our initial V2R model was obtained using a rule-based automated method for GPCR modeling and refined using constrained simulated annealing in vacuo. The docking site of the native vasopressin ligand was selected and justified upon consideration of ligand-receptor interactions and structure-activity data. The primary purpose of this work was to investigate the usefulness of MD simulation of an integral membrane protein like a GPCR receptor, upon inclusion of a carefully parameterized surrounding lipid membrane and water. Physical properties of the system were evaluated and compared with the fully hydrated pure DMPC bilayer membrane. The solvation interactions, individual lipid-protein interaction and fluctuations of the protein, the lipid, and water were analyzed in detail. As expected, the membrane-spanning helices of the protein fluctuate less than the peripheral loops do. The protein appears to disturb the local lipid structure. Simulations were carried out using AMBER 4.1 package upon constant number-pressure-temperature (NPT) conditions on massively parallel computers Cray T3E and IBM SP2.     

V2 vasopressin receptor (V2R) mutations in partial nephrogenic diabetes insipidus highlight protean agonism of V2R antagonists

Inactivating mutations of the V2 vasopressin receptor (V2R) cause cross-linked congenital nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (NDI), resulting in renal resistance to the antidiuretic hormone AVP. In two families showing partial NDI, characterized by an apparently normal response to diagnostic tests and an increase in the basal ADH levels suggesting AVP resistance, we have identified two V2R mutations, Ser-333del and Y128S. Both mutant V2Rs, when expressed in COS-7 cells, show partial defects in vasopressin-stimulated cAMP accumulation and intracellular localization. The inhibition of internalization does not rescue their localization. In contrast, the non-peptide V2R antagonists OPC41061 and OPC31260 partially rescue the membrane localization and basal function of these V2R mutants, whereas they inhibit the basal activity of the wild-type V2R. These results indicate that a partial loss of function of Ser-333del and Y128S mutant V2Rs results from defective membrane trafficking. These findings further indicate that V2R antagonists can act as protean agonists, serving as pharmacological chaperones for inactivating V2R mutants and also as inverse agonists of wild-type receptors. We speculate that this protean agonism could underlie the possible dual beneficial effects of the V2R antagonist: improvement of hyponatremia with heart failure or polycystic kidney disease and potential rescue of NDI.     

Polarized expression of the GFP-tagged rat V(1a) vasopressin receptor.

We investigated the targeting of the V(1a) receptor fused with the green fluorescence protein (V(1a)R-GFP) in polarized MDCK cells. Cells expressing V(1a)R-GFP displayed binding to vasopressin (AVP) and AVP-induced calcium responses, similar to cells expressing the wild-type V1a receptor. Interestingly, as with the wild-type V(1a)R, V(1a)R-GFP is preferentially distributed in the basolateral side of MDCK cells as monitored by confocal microscopy. Furthermore, AVP induced internalization of GFP-tagged receptors. Therefore, the GFP-tagged V(1a) receptor retains all the sorting signals of the wild-type receptor and offers an excellent system to elucidate the mechanisms of cell trafficking of V(1a) receptors.     

Mechanisms of subcellular cytosolic Ca2+ signaling evoked by stimulation of the vasopressin V1a receptor.

Receptor activation may result in distinct subcellular patterns of Ca2+ release. To define the subcellular distribution of Ca2+i signals induced by stimulation of the vasopressin V1a receptor, we expressed the cloned receptor in Xenopus oocytes. Oocytes were then loaded with fluo-3 and observed using confocal microscopy. Vasopressin induced a single concentric wave of increased Ca2+ that radiated inward from the plasma membrane. With submaximal stimulation, however, regions of the Ca2+ wave spontaneously reorganized into repetitive (oscillatory) waves. Focal stimulation of a small part of the plasma membrane resulted in a Ca2+ wave which began at the point of stimulation, radiated toward the center of the cell, then reorganized into multiple foci of repetitive, colliding waves and spirals of increased Ca2+i. The pattern of Ca2+ signaling induced by focal or global stimulation was not altered in Ca(2+)-free medium, although signals did not propagate as fast. Finally, subcellular Ca2+ signaling patterns induced by vasopressin were inhibited by caffeine, while neither vasopressin nor microinjection of inositol trisphosphate blocked caffeine-induced increases in cytosolic Ca2+. Thus, stimulation of the V1a receptor in this cell system induces a complex pattern of Ca2+ signaling which is influenced by (1) the magnitude of the stimulus, (2) the distribution of the surface receptors that are stimulated, and (3) mobilization of Ca2+ from the extracellular space as well as from two distinct endogenous Ca2+ pools. The manner in which a single type of receptor is activated may represent an important potential mechanism for subcellular Ca2+i signaling.     

Contribution of the vasopressin V1 receptor to its hydrosmotic response

Toad urinary bladder epithelial cells grown in culture (primary) show a significant increase in water-soluble inositol phosphates when treated with 10(-8) M vasopressin (AVP), but not with (1-deamino-8-D-arginine)vasopressin (dDAVP), a V2-agonist. The increase in inositol phosphates was blocked by the V1-antagonist, d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)AVP, suggesting a V1-coupled phosphoinositide breakdown. The V1-antagonist had no effect on basal adenylate cyclase activity nor on that stimulated by AVP. However, the V1-antagonist was found to attenuate the hydrosmotic response of AVP, suggesting some role of the V1-receptor cascade in the water flow response. Mezerein (MZ), a non-phorbol activator of protein kinase C (PKC) increased osmotic water flow when added to the mucosal surface. The response was less in magnitude and occurred over a longer period (90 min) than that observed with AVP. In an attempt to emulate the V1-response, activation of PKC, and an increase in intracellular calcium, toad bladders were incubated with MZ and the calcium ionophore A23187 (IP). It was found that IP enhanced the water flow response to MZ at all times measured. Mz and IP were also found to enhance cAMP-mediated water flow, suggesting that apical membrane permeability may be regulated in part through V1-receptor stimulation and its respective second messengers. Collectively, these observations suggest that the V1 receptor may play a role not only as part of a negative feedback system, but also as an integral component of the enhanced water permeability that occurs at the apical membrane.     

Homologous and heterologous phosphorylation of the vasopressin V1a receptor

The vasopressin V1a receptor undergoes homologous and heterologous desensitizations which can be mimicked by activation of protein kinase C. This suggests that phosphorylation of the V1a receptor may be involved in the desensitization mechanisms. Such a phosphorylation was presently investigated in HEK 293 cells stably transfected with rat vasopressin V1a receptor. Metabolic labelling and immunoprecipitation of epitope-tagged V1a receptor evidenced a 52-kDa band and a 92-kDa band. Glycosidase treatments and immunoblotting experiments suggest that the 52-kDa band corresponds to an immature unprocessed receptor protein, whereas the 92-kDa band would correspond to a highly glycosylated form of the mature V1a receptor. Exposure of the cells to vasopressin induced a selective 32P phosphate incorporation in the 92-kDa form of the receptor. This homologous ligand-induced phosphorylation was dose dependent with maximal phosphate incorporation corresponding to four times the basal level. Stimulation of the endogenous phospholipase C-coupled m3 muscarinic receptor by carbachol-induced heterologous phosphorylation of the V1a receptor whose amplitude was half that of the homologous phosphorylation. This heterologous phosphorylation was associated with a reduced vasopressin-dependent increase in intracellular calcium.     

Rescue of a nephrogenic diabetes insipidus-causing vasopressin V2 receptor mutant by cell-penetrating peptides

Mutant membrane proteins are frequently retained in the early secretory pathway by a quality control system, thereby causing disease. An example are mutants of the vasopressin V(2) receptor (V(2)R) leading to nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. Transport-defective V(2)Rs fall into two classes: those retained exclusively in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and those reaching post-ER compartments such as the ER/Golgi intermediate compartment. Although numerous chemical or pharmacological chaperones that rescue the transport of ER-retained membrane proteins are known, substances acting specifically in post-ER compartments have not been described as yet. Using the L62P (ER-retained) and Y205C (reaching post-ER compartments) mutants of the V(2)R as a model, we show here that the cell-penetrating peptide penetratin and its synthetic analog KLAL rescue the transport of the Y205C mutant. In contrast, the location of the L62P mutant is not influenced by either peptide because the peptides are unable to enter the ER. We also show data indicating that the peptide-mediated transport rescue is associated with an increase in cytosolic Ca(2+) concentrations. Thus, we describe a new class of substances influencing protein transport specifically in post-ER compartments.     

Rescue of vasopressin V2 receptor mutants by chemical chaperones: specificity and mechanism

Because missense mutations in genetic diseases of membrane proteins often result in endoplasmic reticulum (ER) retention of functional proteins, drug-induced rescue of their cell surface expression and understanding the underlying mechanism are of clinical value. To study this, we tested chemical chaperones and sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase pump inhibitors on Madin-Darby canine kidney cells expressing nine ER-retained vasopressin type-2 receptor (V2R) mutants involved in nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. Of these nine, only V2R-V206D showed improved maturation and plasma membrane rescue with glycerol, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), thapsigargin/curcumin, and ionomycin but not with other osmolytes or growth at 27 degrees C. This revealed that rescue is mutant specific and that this mutant is prone to rescue by multiple compounds. Rescue did not involve changed expression of molecular chaperones calnexin, heat-shock protein (HSP) 70, or HSP90. V2R antagonist SR121463B treatment revealed that V2R-V206D and V2R-S167T were rescued and matured to a greater extent, suggesting that the rescuing activity of a pharmacological versus chemical chaperone is broader and stronger. Calcium measurements showed that rescue of V2R-V206D by thapsigargin, curcumin, and ionomycin was because of increased cytosolic calcium level, rather than decreased endoplasmic reticulum calcium level. The molecular mechanism underlying rescue by DMSO, glycerol, and SR121463B is different, because with these compounds intracellular calcium levels were unaffected.     

The V2 vasopressin receptor stimulates ERK1/2 activity independently of heterotrimeric G protein signalling

The V2 vasopressin receptor (V2R) activates the mitogen activated protein kinases (MAPK) ERK1/2 through a mechanism involving the scaffolding protein beta arrestin. Here we report that this activating pathway is independent of G alpha s, G alpha i, G alpha q or G betagamma and that the V2R-mediated activation of G alpha s inhibits ERK1/2 activity in a cAMP/PKA-dependent manner. In the HEK293 cells studied, the beta arrestin-promoted activation was found to dominate over the PKA-mediated inhibition of the pathway, leading to a strong vasopressin-stimulated ERK1/2 activation. Despite the strong MAPK activation and in contrast with other GPCR, V2R did not induce any significant increase in DNA synthesis, consistent with the notion that the stable interaction between V2R and beta arrestin prevents signal propagation to the nucleus. Beta arrestin was found to be essential for the ERK1/2 activation, indicating that the recruitment of the scaffolding protein is necessary and sufficient to initiate the signal in the absence of any other stimulatory cues. Based on the use of selective pharmacological inhibitors, dominant negative mutants and siRNA, we conclude that the beta arrestin-dependent activation of ERK1/2 by the V2R involves c-Src and a metalloproteinase-dependent trans-activation event. These findings demonstrate that beta arrestin is a genuine signalling initiator that can, on its own, engage a MAPK activation machinery upon stimulation of a GPCR by its natural ligand.     

Inhibition of renal cystic disease development and progression by a vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist

The polycystic kidney diseases (PKDs) are a group of genetic disorders causing significant renal failure and death in children and adults. There are no effective treatments. Two childhood forms, autosomal recessive PKD (ARPKD) and nephronophthisis (NPH), are characterized by collecting-duct cysts. We used animal models orthologous to the human disorders to test whether a vasopressin V2 receptor (VPV2R) antagonist, OPC31260, would be effective against early or established disease. Adenosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP) has a major role in cystogenesis, and the VPV2R is the major cAMP agonist in the collecting duct. OPC31260 administration lowered renal cAMP, inhibited disease development and either halted progression or caused regression of established disease. These results indicate that OPC31260 may be an effective treatment for these disorders and that clinical trials should be considered.     

Structural implication for receptor oligomerization from functional reconstitution studies of mutant V2 vasopressin receptors

Previous studies have established that G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are composed of independent folding domains. Based on this findings we attempted to rescue the function of clinically relevant missense mutations (R137H, S167L, and R181C) within the N-terminal domain of the V2 vasopressin receptor (V2-R), by coexpressing mutated full-length (Y280C) and C-terminally truncated (E242X) receptor constructs in COS-7 cells. Coimmunoprecipitation and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay studies demonstrated a specific association of E242X with full-length V2-Rs even in the presence of missense mutations. Systematic analysis of the structural requirements for the observed receptor/fragment association showed that N-terminal fragments containing at least transmembrane regions 1-3 interact with the full-length V2-R. Despite this specific interaction, no functional reconstitution was achieved for mutant V2-Rs following coexpression with E242X and Y280C. However, functional activity of R137H and R181C upon coexpression with E242X was regained by mutational disruption of the extracellular disulfide bond, which is highly conserved among GPCRs. Our data with the V2-R are consistent with a structural model in which class I GPCRs form contact oligomers by lateral interaction rather than by a domain-swapping mechanism.     

A vasopressin analog that binds but does not activate V1 or V2 vasopressin receptors is not internalized into cells that express V1 or V2 receptors.

To assess whether receptor binding is sufficient to initiate vasopressin receptor endocytosis in cells expressing the vasopressin V1 or V2 receptors, we synthesized a novel fluorescent-labeled vasopressin analog, [1-(beta-mercapto-beta, beta-cyclopentamethylene propionic acid), 2-(O-ethyl)-D-tyrosine, 4-valine, 8-lysine-N6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine] vasopressin (R-CLVP), that binds to vasopressin receptors but does not activate intracellular events such as the mobilization of intracellular calcium or the activation of adenylate cyclase. We compared the manner in which this analog was endocytosed in cells expressing V1 (A-10, rat smooth muscle cells) or V2 (LLC-PK1, porcine kidney cells) receptors with that of a full agonist, [1-(beta-mercaptopropionic acid), 8-lysine-N6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine] vasopressin (R-MLVP) [Lutz et al. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 4657-4663; Lutz et al. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87,6507-6511]. We showed that R-CLVP bound to both types of receptors with good affinity. It failed to increase cyclic AMP concentrations in LLC-PK1 cells and did not increase the mobilization of intracellular calcium in A-10 cells. It bound to the surface of both these cell types in a diffuse manner and it did not undergo receptor endocytosis in either cell type. In contrast, R-MLVP, an agonist that bound to both receptor subtypes and elicited changes in intracellular cyclic AMP and calcium, bound to the surface of these cells in a diffuse manner at early times after exposure, and rapidly underwent endocytosis. We conclude that binding of vasopressin to its receptors alone is insufficient to cause receptor endocytosis, and other events distal to the receptor are required to initiate endocytosis. R-CLVP should be a useful analog in determining the factors responsible for initiating receptor endocytosis.     

Palmitoylation of the V2 vasopressin receptor carboxyl tail enhances beta-arrestin recruitment leading to efficient receptor endocytosis and ERK1/2 activation

A large number of G protein-coupled receptors are palmitoylated on cysteine residues located in their carboxyl tail, but the general role of this post-translational modification remains poorly understood. Here we show that preventing palmitoylation of the V2 vasopressin receptor, by site-directed mutagenesis of cysteines 341 and 342, significantly delayed and decreased both agonist-promoted receptor endocytosis and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation. Pharmacological blockade of receptor endocytosis is without effect on the vasopressin-stimulated mitogen-activated protein kinase activity, excluding the possibility that the reduced kinase activation mediated by the palmitoylation-less mutant could result from altered receptor endocytosis. In contrast, two dominant negative mutants of beta-arrestin which inhibit receptor endocytosis also attenuated vasopressin-stimulated mitogen-activated protein kinase activity, suggesting that the scaffolding protein, beta-arrestin, represents the common link among receptor palmitoylation, endocytosis, and kinase activation. Coimmunoprecipitation and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer experiments confirmed that inhibiting receptor palmitoylation considerably reduced the vasopressin-stimulated recruitment of beta-arrestin to the receptor. Interestingly, the changes in beta-arrestin recruitment kinetics were similar to those observed for vasopressin-stimulated receptor endocytosis and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation. Taken together the results indicate that palmitoylation enhances the recruitment of beta-arrestin to the activated V2 vasopressin receptor thus facilitating processes requiring the scaffolding action of beta-arrestin.