Hormonal regulation of vitellogenin genes: an estrogen-responsive element in the Xenopus A2 gene and a multihormonal regulatory region in the chicken II gene

Expression of the vitellogenin genes in avian and amphibian liver is regulated by estrogens. The DNA elements mediating estrogen induction of the various vitellogenin genes of chicken and Xenopus encompass one or more copies of a 13-mer palindromic sequence called the estrogen-responsive element (ERE). Here we show that upon incubation with the purified estrogen receptor (ER) from calf uterus the Xenopus vitellogenin A2 gene yields a DNase-I footprint over the ERE between -331 and -319. This element does not mediate the response to glucocorticoids or progestins in T47D cells. The three guanine residues in each half of the palindrome are protected against methylation by dimethylsulfate after incubation with ER, but not with glucocorticoid (GR) or progesterone (PR) receptors. In contrast, the chicken vitellogenin II gene exhibits multihormonal regulation by estrogens, progestins, and glucocorticoids in T47D and MCF7 cells. Regulation is mediated by the DNA region between -721 and -591 that contains four binding sites for hormone receptors, as demonstrated by DNase-I footprints and methylation protection experiments. The two distal and most proximal binding sites are recognized by ER, GR, and PR, whereas the central binding site is only bound by ER and GR. At suboptimal concentrations, estrogens and progestins or glucocorticoids act synergistically. In experiments using a DNA fragment containing an ERE adjacent to a glucocorticoid-responsive element/progesterone-responsive element, ER and PR bind synergistically to their corresponding sites, perhaps explaining the functional synergism of both hormones. Thus, two very different regulatory elements are used to mediate estrogen induction of related genes in chickens and amphibians.     

Synergism of closely adjacent estrogen-responsive elements increases their regulatory potential

Recent gene transfer experiments have shown that an estrogen-responsive DNA element (ERE) GGTCANNNTGACC mediates the estrogen inducibility of the Xenopus laevis vitellogenin A1 and A2 genes as well as the chicken vitellogenin II gene. We report here on experiments that explain the estrogen regulation of the Xenopus vitellogenin B1 and B2 genes. In these genes, two ERE homologues, which have only low, if any, regulatory capacity on their own, act synergistically to achieve high estrogen inducibility. Furthermore we show that synergism of EREs is most efficient, when the two elements are closely adjacent and that it is lost when the synergistic elements are separated by 125 basepairs. In-vitro estrogen receptor binding experiments indicate that co-operative binding of estrogen receptors to closely adjacent EREs is not essential for synergism of ERE homologues that have no intrinsic regulatory capacity. Functional synergism of EREs is observed in the human estrogen-responsive MCF-7 cell line as well as in mouse fibroblasts (Ltk-) cotransfected with estrogen receptor expression vectors. Even expression of a truncated receptor protein lacking 178 amino acid residues of the amino-terminal end allows synergism, suggesting that the amino-terminal end preceding the DNA-binding domain of the estrogen receptor is not required.     

Functional interaction of hybrid response elements with wild-type and mutant steroid hormone receptors.

Steroid hormone receptors can be divided into two subfamilies according to the structure of their DNA binding domains and the nucleotide sequences which they recognize. The glucocorticoid receptor and the progesterone receptor (PR) recognize an imperfect palindrome (glucocorticoid responsive element/progesterone responsive element [GRE/PRE]) with the conserved half-sequence TGTYCY, whereas the estrogen receptor (ER) recognizes a palindrome (estrogen responsive element) with the half-sequence TGACC. A series of symmetric and asymmetric variants of these hormone responsive elements (HREs) have been tested for receptor binding and for the ability to mediate induction in vivo. High-resolution analysis demonstrates that the overall number and distribution of contacts with the N-7 position of guanines and with the phosphate backbone of various HREs are quite similar for PR and ER. However, PR and glucocorticoid receptor, but not ER, are able to contact the 5'-methyl group of thymines found in position 3 of HREs, as shown by potassium permanganate interference. The ER mutant HE84, which contains a single amino acid exchange, Glu-203 to Gly, in the knuckle of ER, creates a promiscuous ER that is able to bind to GRE/PREs by contacting this thymine. Elements with the sequence GGTCAcagTGTYCT that represent hybrids between an estrogen response element and a GRE/PRE respond to estrogens, glucocorticoids, and progestins in vivo and bind all three wild-type receptors in vitro. These hybrid HREs could serve to confer promiscuous gene regulation.     

Competition for DNA steroid response elements as a possible mechanism for neuroendocrine integration

For the analysis of a simple steroid-dependent mating behavior, careful response definition, complete neural circuit delineation and placement of estrogen-responsive cells within this circuit have been accomplished. Molecular studies of two relevant genes have emphasized DNA/RNA hybridization assays nd DNA binding techniques. For both the rat preproenkephalin gene and the gene for the progesterone receptor, a strong induction by estrogen, tissue specificity of expression and a sex difference in regulation are prominent phenomena. On the rat preproenkephalin promoter, estrogen (ER) and thyroid receptors may compete for a DNA binding site. Likewise, progesterone (PR) and glucocorticoid receptors may compete for the same sites. On the rat PR gene, interactions between ER and AP-1 binding proteins are of special interest. Such interactions could underlay competitions and synergies between steroid hormones and neurally signalled events in the environment.     

Regulation of nuclear binding of the avian oviduct progesterone receptor. Changes during estrogen-induced oviduct development, withdrawal, and secondary stimulation

The progesterone receptors from various stages of estrogen induced oviduct development, estrogen withdrawal, and secondary stimulation with estrogen were examined. The progesterone receptors were characterized for their biological function (i.e. capacity for nuclear translocation, nuclear binding, and effects on RNA polymerase II activity) as well as certain physical properties. The progesterone receptors from the undeveloped or partially developed oviducts (0 to 8 days of estrogen treatment) displayed little or no nuclear translocation and binding in vivo or in vitro. Similarly, progesterone showed little or no effect in vivo on RNA polymerase II activity at the early stages of development. As development progressed from 8 to 12 days of estrogen treatment, the above parameters rapidly increased to maximal levels and plateaued through day 23 of estrogen treatment. A marked decrease in these parameters occurred within 1 day of estrogen withdrawal. The reverse series of events occurred during secondary estrogen stimulation of 10-day-old withdrawn chicks. While the receptor concentrations increased rapidly to maximum values by 2 days of restimulation, receptor function did not return until day 4. Similarly, the effects of progesterone on RNA polymerase II activity reached maximal values by day 4. The progesterone receptor isolated from oviducts during development, estrogen withdrawal, and restimulation, displayed similar patterns of cell-free binding to chromatin and nucleoacidic protein as that observed in vivo supporting the nativeness of the in vitro binding assay. In contrast, the cell-free binding of these same progesterone receptor to pure DNA were not similar to the in vivo binding, i.e. no patterns (differences) in progesterone receptor binding were observed. These data support that protein DNA complexes and not pure DNA represent the native acceptor sites for oviduct progesterone receptor. Comparison of the progesterone receptor between the functional and nonfunctional states revealed no differences in the steroid affinity for the receptor, in the apparent pI of the species, or in the sedimentation of the receptor under high salt conditions. However, the nonfunctional receptors consistently displayed a deficiency in one of the two monomer molecular species (the B species) as determined by isoelectric focusing. These results suggest that both monomer species of progesterone receptor are required for biological activity. Interestingly, the 7S "aggregate" species of the progesterone receptor was constantly detected even when only one of the monomer species was present.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

From the structure of steroid receptors to their assessment by immunocytochemistry in target cells

Immunohistochemical studies with antibodies to steroid hormone receptors provide new insight in the mechanism of action of steroid hormones. Immunologically reactive estrogen and progesterone receptors are found exclusively in cell nuclei of target cells even in the absence of the hormonal ligand. A hormonal treatment inducing receptor transformation and "translocation" to the nucleus does not modify the intracellular distribution of the receptor. This result is in contradiction with most biochemical studies which show a displacement of receptor from the cytosolic fraction to the nuclear fraction after hormone-receptor complex formation. We propose that different affinity levels of the non-transformed and hormone-complexed receptor molecules for nuclear structure produce unequal losses of nuclear receptor during homogenization. A lesser loss appears as an increase in nuclear binding sites or immunologically reactive receptor. The glucocorticosteroid receptor differs from the others in that it shows an increase of nuclear immunoreactive receptor after hormone administration. This result was accepted as evidence for a nuclear translocation in the sense initially proposed for all steroid hormones. Alternatively, one may propose another explanation based on the same experimental artefact as invoked for the estrogen and progesterone cytosol receptors. A higher affinity of the hormone-complexed receptor entails a lesser loss from the nucleus during tissue processing, and consequently an apparent increase in nuclear staining. Such a possibility is currently tested in parallel with the progesterone receptor.