Association of trxG and PcG proteins with the bxd maintenance element depends on transcriptional activity

Polycomb group (PcG) and trithorax group (trxG) proteins act in an epigenetic fashion to maintain active and repressive states of expression of the Hox and other target genes by altering their chromatin structure. Genetically, mutations in trxG and PcG genes can antagonize each other's function, whereas mutations of genes within each group have synergistic effects. Here, we show in Drosophila that multiple trxG and PcG proteins act through the same or juxtaposed sequences in the maintenance element (ME) of the homeotic gene Ultrabithorax. Surprisingly, trxG or PcG proteins, but not both, associate in vivo in any one cell in a salivary gland with the ME of an activated or repressed Ultrabithorax transgene, respectively. Among several trxG and PcG proteins, only Ash1 and Asx require Trithorax in order to bind to their target genes. Together, our data argue that at the single-cell level, association of repressors and activators correlates with gene silencing and activation, respectively. There is, however, no overall synergism or antagonism between and within the trxG and PcG proteins and, instead, only subsets of trxG proteins act synergistically.     

Maintenance of the patterns of expression of homeotic genes in the development of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila melanogaster</Emphasis> by proteins of the polycomb,trithorax, and ETP groups

Proteins encoded by genes of the Polycomb (PcG), trithorax (trxG), and the Enhancer of trithorax and Polycomb (ETP) groups are important regulators of expression of most developmental genes. Data concerning all currently described genes assigned to these groups are summarized in the review. Genetic interactions of these genes and phenotypic manifestation of their mutations are described. Data on the PcG, trxG, and ETP proteins are systematized. Questions are considered concerning the formation of multimeric complexes containing proteins of these groups, recruitment of these complexes to regulatory elements of target genes, and the mechanisms of activation/repression of gene expression.     

The role of Polycomb Group Proteins in Cell Cycle Regulation During Development

Polycomb group (PcG) and trithorax group (trxG) proteins are evolutionarilyconserved chromatin modifiers that have well known roles in the maintenance ofsilent and active expression states of homeotic genes. PcG proteins may also beinvolved in the control of cellular proliferation, as several PcG complexes have beenshown to act either as proto-oncogenes or as tumor suppressors in vertebrates. InDrosophila, PcG factors associate with specific DNA regions termed PcG responseelements (PREs), and a PRE was recently identified in the gene encoding Cyclin A.Still, it is not yet clear how PcG complexes could control cell cycle progression.Beyond acting as stable silencers of cell cycle genes during the differentiationprocess, PcG complexes might also be integrators and/or modulators of cell cyclecheckpoints in dividing cells. Here, we discuss this dual aspect of PcG involvement inepigenetic cell cycle control.     

ATX-1, an Arabidopsis homolog of trithorax,activates flower homeotic genes

BACKGROUND: The genes of the trithorax (trxG) and Polycomb groups (PcG) are best known for their regulatory functions in Drosophila, where they control homeotic gene expression. Plants and animals are thought to have evolved multicellularity independently. Although homeotic genes control organ identity in both animals and plants, they are unrelated. Despite this fact, several plant homeotic genes are negatively regulated by plant genes similar to the repressors from the animal PcG. However, plant-activating regulators of the trxG have not been characterized. RESULTS: We provide genetic, molecular, functional, and biochemical evidence that an Arabidopsis gene, ATX1, which is similar to the Drosophila trx, regulates floral organ development. The effects are specific: structurally and functionally related flower homeotic genes are under different control. We show that ATX1 is an epigenetic regulator with histone H3K4 methyltransferase activity. This is the first example of this kind of enzyme activity reported in plants, and, in contrast to the Drosophila and the yeast trithorax homologs, ATX1 can methylate in the absence of additional proteins. In its ability to methylate H3K4 as a recombinant protein, ATX1 is similar to the human homolog. CONCLUSIONS: ATX1 functions as an activator of homeotic genes, like Trithorax in animal systems. The histone methylating activity of the ATX1-SET domain argues that the molecular basis of these effects is the ability of ATX1 to modify chromatin structure. Our results suggest a conservation of trxG function between the animal and plant kingdoms despite the different structural nature of their targets.     

Polycomb group and trithorax group proteins in Arabidopsis

Polycomb group (PcG) and trithorax group (trxG) proteins form molecular modules of a cellular memory mechanism that maintains gene expression states established by other regulators. In general, PcG proteins are responsible for maintaining a repressed expression state, whereas trxG proteins act in opposition to maintain an active expression state. This mechanism, first discovered in Drosophila and subsequently in mammals, has more recently been studied in plants. The characterization of several Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) components in Arabidopsis thaliana constituted a first breakthrough, revealing key roles of PcG proteins in the control of crucial plant developmental processes. Interestingly, the recent identification of plant homologues of the Drosophila trithorax protein suggests a conservation of both the PcG and trxG gene regulatory system in plants. Here, we review the current evidence for the role of PcG and trxG proteins in the control of plant development, their biochemical functions, their interplay in maintaining stable expression states of their target genes, and point out future directions which may help our understanding of PcG and trxG function in plants.     

Reconstitution of a functional core polycomb repressive complex

The opposing actions of polycomb (PcG) and trithorax group (trxG) gene products maintain essential gene expression patterns during Drosophila development. PcG proteins are thought to establish repressive chromatin structures, but the mechanisms by which this occurs are not known. Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) contains several PcG proteins and inhibits chromatin remodeling by trxG-related SWI/SNF complexes. We have defined a functional core of PRC1 by reconstituting a stable complex using four recombinant PcG proteins. One subunit, PSC, can also inhibit chromatin remodeling on its own. These PcG proteins create a chromatin structure that has normal nucleosome organization and is accessible to nucleases but excludes hSWI/SNF.     

Genome regulation by polycomb and trithorax proteins

Polycomb group (PcG) and trithorax group (trxG) proteins are critical regulators of numerous developmental genes. To silence or activate gene expression, respectively, PcG and trxG proteins bind to specific regions of DNA and direct the posttranslational modification of histones. Recent work suggests that PcG proteins regulate the nuclear organization of their target genes and that PcG-mediated gene silencing involves noncoding RNAs and the RNAi machinery.     

The Arabidopsis thaliana SET-domain-containing protein ASHH1/SDG26 interacts with itself and with distinct histone lysine methyltransferases

Polycomb group (PcG) and trithorax group (trxG) proteins are key regulators of homeotic genes and have central roles in cell proliferation, growth and development. In animals, PcG and trxG proteins form higher order protein complexes that contain SET domain proteins with histone methyltransferase activity, and are responsible for the different types of lysine methylation at the N-terminal tails of the core histone proteins. However, whether H3K4 methyltransferase complexes exist in Arabidopsis thaliana remains unknown. Here, we make use of the yeast two-hybrid system and the bimolecular fluorescence complementation assay to provide evidence for the self-association of the Arabidopsis thaliana SET-domain-containing protein SET DOMAIN GROUP 26 (SDG26), also known as ABSENT, SMALL, OR HOMEOTIC DISCS 1 HOMOLOG 1 (ASHH1). In addition, we show that the ASHH1 protein associates with SET-domain-containing sequences from two distinct histone lysine methyltransferases, the ARABIDOPSIS HOMOLOG OF TRITHORAX-1 (ATX1) and ASHH2 proteins. Furthermore, after screening a cDNA library we found that ASHH1 interacts with two proteins from the heat shock protein 40?kDa (Hsp40/DnaJ) superfamily, thus connecting the epigenetic network with a system sensing external cues. Our findings suggest that trxG complexes in Arabidopsis thaliana could involve different sets of histone lysine methyltransferases, and that these complexes may be engaged in multiple developmental processes in Arabidopsis.     

GAGA facilitates binding of Pleiohomeotic to a chromatinized Polycomb response element

Polycomb response elements (PREs) are chromosomal elements, typically comprising thousands of base pairs of poorly defined sequences that confer the maintenance of gene expression patterns by Polycomb group (PcG) repressors and trithorax group (trxG) activators. Genetic studies have indicated a synergistic requirement for the trxG protein GAGA and the PcG protein Pleiohomeotic (PHO) in silencing at several PREs. However, the molecular basis of this cooperation remains unknown. Here, using DNaseI footprinting analysis, we provide a high-resolution map of sites for the sequence- specific DNA-binding PcG protein PHO, trxG proteins GAGA and Zeste and the gap protein Hunchback (HB) on the 1.6 kb Ultrabithorax (Ubx) PRE. Although these binding elements are present throughout the PRE, they display clear patterns of clustering, suggestive of functional collaboration at the level of PRE binding. We found that while GAGA could efficiently bind to a chromatinized PRE, PHO alone was incapable of binding to chromatin. However, PHO binding to chromatin, but not naked DNA, was strongly facilitated by GAGA, indicating interdependence between GAGA and PHO already at the level of PRE binding. These results provide a biochemical explanation for the in vivo cooperation between GAGA and PHO and suggest that PRE function involves the integrated activities of genetically antagonistic trxG and PcG proteins.