Effects of running water on brainstem lateral line responses in trout,<Emphasis Type="Italic"> Oncorhynchus mykiss</Emphasis>, to sinusoidal wave stimuli

We investigated how single units in the medial octavolateralis nucleus of the rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, respond to a 50-Hz vibrating sphere in still and running water. Four types of units were distinguished. Type MI units (N=16) were flow-sensitive; their ongoing discharge rates either increased or decreased in running water, and as a consequence, responses of these units to the vibrating sphere were masked if the fish was exposed to water flow. Type MII units (N=7) were not flow-sensitive; their ongoing discharge rates were comparable in still and running water, and thus their responses to the vibrating sphere were not masked. Type MIII units (N=7) were also not flow-sensitive; nevertheless, their responses to the vibrating sphere were masked in running water. Type MIV units (N=14) were flow-sensitive, but their responses to the vibrating sphere were not masked. Our data confirm previous findings in the goldfish, Carassius auratus, indicating that the organization of the peripheral lateral line is reflected to a large degree in the medial octavolateralis nucleus. We compare data from goldfish and trout and discuss differences with respect to lateral line morphology, lifestyle and habitat of these species.Abbreviations CN canal neuromast - MON medial octavolateralis nucleus - SN superfical neuromast - a.c. alternating current - d.c. direct current     

Lateral line reception in still- and running water

The lateral line of fish is composed of neuromasts used to detect water motions. Neuromasts occur as superficial neuromasts on the skin and as canal neuromasts in subepidermal canals. Fibres of the lateral line nerves innervate both. There have been extensive studies on the responses of lateral line nerve fibres to dipole stimuli applied in still water. However, despite the fact that many fish live in rivers and/or swim constantly, responses of lateral line nerve fibres to dipole stimuli presented in running water have never been recorded. We investigated how the peripheral lateral line of still water fish ( Carassius auratus) and riverine fish ( Oncorhynchus mykiss) responds to minute sinusoidal water motions while exposed to unidirectional water flow. Both goldfish and trout have two types of posterior lateral line nerve fibres: Type I fibres, which most likely innervate superficial neuromasts, were stimulated by running water (10 cm s(-1)). The responses of type I fibres to water motions generated by a vibrating sphere were masked if the fish was exposed to running water. Type II fibres, which most likely innervate canal neuromasts, were not stimulated by running water. Consequently, responses of type II fibres to a vibrating sphere were not masked under flow conditions.     

Responses to dipole stimuli of anterior lateral line nerve fibres in goldfish, <Emphasis Type="Italic">Carassius auratus</Emphasis>, under still and running water conditions

We investigated how fibres in the anterior lateral line nerve of goldfish, Carassius auratus, respond to sinusoidal water motions in a background of still or running water. Two types of fibres were distinguished: type I fibres, which most likely innervate superficial neuromasts, were stimulated by running water (10 cm s⁻¹) while type II fibres, which most likely innervate canal neuromasts, were not stimulated by running water. The responses of type I fibres to sinusoidal water motions were masked in running water whereas responses of type II fibres were not masked. These findings are in agreement with previous data obtained from the posterior lateral line nerve of goldfish. Furthermore, we demonstrate here that for type I fibres the degree of response masking increased with increasing flow velocity. Finally, the ratio between responses that were masked in running water (type I) and those that were not masked (type II) increases with increasing flow velocity. Flow fluctuations that were generated by a cylinder in front of the fish did not affect ongoing activity in the flow, nor the dipole-evoked responses. The findings are discussed with respect to particle image velocimetry data of the water motions generated in the experiments.     

Responses of lateral line receptors to water flow in the Antarctic notothenioid, Trematomus bernacchii

The response properties of anterior lateral line afferent neurones in Trematomus bernacchii were recorded extracellularly while stimulating the fish with unidirectional water flows of varying velocity. Afferent neurone responses were either flow-sensitive or flow-insensitive. Flow-sensitive neurones showed linear increases in response magnitude with increasing flow rate and tonic non-adapting response properties. These findings indicate that flow-sensitive afferent neurones originate from lateral line receptors that detect absolute flow velocity. The likely explanation is that flow-sensitive afferent neurones innervate neuromasts located superficially on the skin and flow-insensitive neurones innervate neuromasts situated in sub-epidermal fluid-filled canals.     

Toral lateral line units of goldfish, Carassius auratus, are sensitive to the position and vibration direction of a vibrating sphere

We recorded the responses of lateral line units in the midbrain torus semicircularis of goldfish, Carassius auratus, to a 50-Hz vibrating sphere and determined the unit's spatial receptive fields for various distances between fish and sphere and for different directions of sphere vibration. All but one unit responded to the vibrating sphere with an increase in discharge rate. Only a proportion (25?%) of the units exhibited phase-locked responses. Receptive fields were narrow or broad and contained one, two or more areas of increased discharge rate. The data show that the receptive fields of toral lateral line units are in many respects similar to those of brainstem units but differ from those of afferent nerve fibres. The responses of primary afferents represent the pressure gradient pattern generated by a vibrating sphere and provide information about sphere location and vibration direction. Across the array of lateral line neuromasts, the fish brain in principle can derive this information. Nevertheless, toral units tuned to a distinct sphere location or sensitive to a distinct sphere vibration direction were not found. Therefore, it is conceivable that the torus semicircularis uses a population code to determine spatial location and vibration direction of a vibrating sphere.     

Two-dimensional receptive fields of midbrain lateral line units in the goldfish, <Emphasis Type="Italic">Carassius auratus</Emphasis>

We determined the receptive fields of midbrain lateral line units in goldfish, Carassius auratus, with a 50 Hz vibrating sphere placed at various azimuths and elevations alongside the fish and studied how responses were affected by different directions of sphere vibration. The receptive fields of toral lateral line units, in contrast to those of primary afferent nerve fibers, did not represent the pressure gradient pattern generated by a vibrating sphere. Thus, unlike primary afferents, single toral lateral line units did not code for source location in their spatial discharge patterns. The two-dimensional receptive fields were round, horizontally or vertically stretched, or complex. While some toral lateral line units were sensitive to the direction of sphere vibration others were not.     

Responses of brainstem lateral line units to different stimulus source locations and vibration directions

We recorded responses of lateral line units in the medial octavolateralis nucleus in the brainstem of goldfish, Carassius auratus, to a 50 Hz vibrating sphere and studied how responses were affected by placing the sphere at various locations alongside the fish and by different directions of vibration. In most units (88%), stimulation with the sphere from one or more spatial locations caused an increase and/or decrease in discharge rate. In few units (10%), discharge rate was increased by stimulation from one location and decreased by stimulation from an adjacent location in space. In a minority of the units (2%), changing sphere location did not affect discharge rates but caused a change in phase coupling. Units sensitive to a distinct sphere vibration direction were not found. The data also show that the responses of most brainstem units differ from those of primary afferent nerve fibers. Whereas primary afferents represent the pressure gradient pattern generated by the sphere and thus encode location and vibration direction of a vibrating sphere, most brainstem units do not. This information may be represented in the brainstem by a population code or in higher centers of the ascending lateral line pathway.     

Brainstem lateral line responses to sinusoidal wave stimuli in the goldfish, Carassius auratus

Extracellular recordings were made from single lateral line units in the medial octavolateralis nucleus in the brainstem of goldfish, Carassius auratus. Units were defined as receiving lateral line input if they responded to the water motions generated by a stationary, sinusoidally oscillating sphere and/or a moving sphere but not to airborne sound and vibrations. Units which responded to airborne sound or vibrations were assumed to receive input from the inner ear and were not further investigated. Responses of lateral line units were quantified in terms of the number of evoked spikes and the degree of phase-locking to a 50 Hz vibrating sphere presented at various stationary locations along the side of the fish. Receptive fields were characterized based on spike rate, degree of phase-locking and average phase angle as a function of sphere location. Four groups of units were distinguished: 1, units with receptive fields comparable to those of primary afferents; 2, units with receptive fields which consisted of one excitatory and one inhibitory area; 3, units with receptive fields which consisted of more than two excitatory and/or inhibitory areas; 4, units with receptive fields which consisted of a single excitatory or a single inhibitory area. The receptive fields of most units were characterized by adjacent excitatory and inhibitory areas. This organization is reminiscent of excitatory-inhibitory receptive field organizations in other vertebrate sensory systems.     

Lateral line nerve fibers do not code bulk water flow direction in turbulent flow

The discharges of anterior and posterior lateral line nerve afferents were recorded while stimulating goldfish, Carassius auratus, with bulk water flow. With increasing flow velocity lateral line afferents increased their discharge rates. However, an increased response to flow rates occurred even if flow direction was reversed. Thus, individual lateral line afferents did not encode the direction of running water. Frequency spectra of the water motions quantified with particle image velocimetry revealed flow fluctuations that increased with increasing flow velocity. Maximal spectral amplitudes of the flow fluctuations were below 5 Hz (bulk flow velocity 4–15 cm s⁻¹). The frequency spectra of the firing rates of lateral line afferents also showed an increase in amplitude when fish were exposed to running water. The maximal spectral amplitudes of the recorded data were in the frequency range 3–8 Hz. This suggests that the lateral line afferents mainly responded to the higher frequency fluctuations that developed under flow conditions, but not to the direct current flow or the lower frequency fluctuations. Although individual lateral line afferents encoded neither flow velocity nor flow direction we suggest that higher order lateral line neurons can do so by monitoring flow fluctuations as they move across the surface of the fish.     

Kármán vortex street detection by the lateral line

Fish use the lateral line system for prey detection, predator avoidance, schooling behavior, intraspecific communication and spatial orientation. In addition the lateral line may be important for station holding and for the detection of the hydrodynamic trails (vortex streets) generated by swimming fish. We investigated the responses of anterior lateral line nerve fibers of goldfish, Carassius auratus, to unidirectional water flow (10 cm s⁻¹) and to running water that contained a Kármán vortex street. Compared to still water conditions, both unidirectional water flow and Kármán vortex streets caused a similar increase in the discharge rate of anterior lateral line nerve fibers. If exposed to a Kármán vortex street, the amplitude of spike train frequency spectra increased at the vortex shedding frequency. This increase was especially pronounced if the fish intercepted the edge of a Kármán vortex street. Our data show that the vortex shedding frequency can be retrieved from the responses of anterior lateral line nerve fibers.     

Responses of the goldfish head lateral line to moving objects

We investigated how fibers in the anterior lateral line nerve of goldfish, Carassius auratus, respond to water motions generated by an object that was moved alongside the fish. Motion direction was from anterior to posterior or opposite, object diameter was between 0.1 and 4 cm and the distance between object and fish varied between 1 and 6 cm. Fibers exhibited monophasic responses characterized by a transient increase in discharge rate, biphasic responses consisting of an increase followed by a decrease in discharge rate or vice versa, or triphasic responses characterized by a rate increase followed by a decrease and again an increase or by the inverse pattern. In two-thirds of the fibers response patterns depended on object motion direction. Of these, about 60% responded to a reversal of motion direction with an inversion of the response pattern. Our results differ from previous data obtained from posterior lateral line nerve fibers in the relative proportions of the observed response patterns, and by a much smaller proportion of fibers that exhibited a direction-dependent response. These differences can be explained by the fact that the spatial orientations of the neuromasts on the head are more heterogenuous than on the trunk.     

Peripheral lateral line responses to amplitude-modulated sinusoidal wave stimuli

This report describes the responses of single afferent fibers in the posterior lateral line nerve of the goldfish, Carassius auratus, to pure tone and to amplitude-modulated sinusoidal wave stimuli generated by a dipole source (stationary vibrating sphere). Responses were characterized in terms of output-input functions relating responses to vibration amplitude, peri-stimulus time histograms relating responses to stimulus duration, and the degree of phase-locking to both the carrier frequency and the modulation frequency of the amplitude-modulated stimulus. All posterior lateral line nerve fibers responded to a pure sine wave with sustained and strongly phase-locked discharges. When stimulated with amplitude-modulated sine waves, fibers responded with strong phase-locking to the carrier frequency and, in addition, discharge rates were modulated according to the amplitude modulation frequency. However, phase-locking to the amplitude modulation frequency was weaker than phase-locking to the carrier frequency. The data indicate that the discharges of primary lateral line afferents encode both the carrier frequency and the modulation frequency of an amplitude-modulated wave stimulus. Accepted: 2 June 1999     

The responses of peripheral and central mechanosensory lateral line units of weakly electric fish to moving objects

Mechanosensory lateral line afferents of weakly electric fish (Eigenmannia) responded to an object which moved parallel to the long axis of the fish with phases of increased spike activity separated by phases of below spontaneous activity. Responses increased with object speed but finally may show saturation. At increasingly greater distances the responses decayed as a power function of distance. For different object velocities the exponents (mean±SD) describing this response falloff were -0.71±0.4 (20 cm/s object velocity) and-1.9±1.25 (10 cm/s). Opposite directions of object movement may cause an inversion of the main features of the response histograms. In terms of peak spike rate or total number of spikes elicited, however, primary lateral line afferents were not directionally sensitive.Central (midbrain) lateral line units of weakly electric fish (Apteronotus) showed a jittery response if an object moved by. In midbrain mechanosensory lateral line, ampullary, and tuberous units the response to a rostral-tocaudal object movement may be different from that elicited by a caudal-to-rostral object motion. Central units of Apteronotus may receive input from two or more sensory modalities. Units may be lateral line-tuberous or lateral line-ampullary. Multimodal lateral line units were OR units, i.e., the units were reliably driven by a unimodal stimulus of either modality. The receptive fields of central units demonstrate a weak somatotopic organization of lateral line input: anterior body areas project to rostral midbrain, posterior body areas project to caudal midbrain.Abbreviation EOD electric organ discharge     

Responses of the goldfish trunk lateral line to moving objects

We recorded the responses of single afferent fibers in the posterior lateral-line nerve of the goldfish, Carassius auratus, to a small object moving in the water. Responses consisted of a dominant and reproducible pattern of discharge which was characterized by excitation followed by inhibition or vice versa. The pattern depended on the direction in which the object moved and was inverse when the direction was reversed. About half of the fibers continued to discharge bursts of spikes for a long time after the object had passed the fish. These spike bursts were not reproducible from one stimulus presentation to the next. In many fibers, the pattern of the response changed with speed and lateral distance of the moving object. Response strength increased with increasing object speed and decreasing lateral distance. Measurements of water motions revealed that the object generated complex water movements, aspects of which were reflected in the discharges of primary lateral-line afferents. The observed uniformity of the responses in the periphery suggests that many, but not all, of the response patterns of central lateral-line units to moving objects are due to additional information processing by the central nervous system and not to peripheral hydrodynamic effects. Accepted: 6 October 1997     

Transformation of peripheral inputs by the first-order lateral line brainstem nucleus

Extracellular recording techniques were used to record the responses of medial nucleus cells and posterior lateral line nerve fibers in mottled sculpin, Cottus bairdi, and goldfish, Carassius auratus, to a 50-Hz dipole source (vibrating sphere). Responses were characterized in terms of (1) receptive fields that relate responsiveness (spike rate and phase-locking) to the location of the source along the length of the fish, (2) input-output functions that relate responsiveness to vibration amplitude for a fixed source location, and (3) peri-stimulus time histograms that relate responsiveness to time during a sustained period of vibration. Relative to posterior lateral line nerve fibers, medial nucleus cells in both species were similar in showing (1) lower spontaneous and evoked rates of spike activity, (2) greater degrees of adaptation, (3) greater heterogeneity in all response characteristics, and (4) evidence for inhibitory/excitatory interactions. Whereas receptive fields of nerve fibers in both species faithfully reflect both pressure gradient amplitudes (with rate changes) and directions (with phase-angle changes) in the stimulus field, receptive fields of medial nucleus were more difficult to relate to the stimulus field. Some, but not all, receptive fields could be modeled with excitatory center/inhibitory surround and inhibitory center/excitatory surround organizations. Accepted: 26 November 1997     

Physiology of lateral line mechanoreceptive regions in the elasmobranch brain

The physiology of mechanoreceptive lateral line areas was investigated in the thornback guitarfish, Platyrhinoidis triseriata, from medulla to telecephalon, using averaged evoked potentials (AEPs) and unit responses as windows to brain functions. Responses were analysed with respect to frequency sensitivity, intensity functions, influence of stimulus repetition rate, response latency, receptive field (RF) organization and multimodal interaction. 1. Following a quasi-natural vibrating sphere stimulus, neural responses were recorded in the medullary medial octavolateralis nucleus (MON), the dorsal (DMN) and anterior (AN) nucleus of the mesencephalic nuclear complex, the diencephalic lateral tuberal nucleus (LTN), and a telencephalic area which may correspond to the medial pallium (Figs. 2, 3, 13, 14, 15, 16). 2. Within the test range of 6.5-200 Hz all lateral line areas investigated responded to minute water vibrations. Best frequencies (in terms of displacement) were between 75 and 200 Hz with threshold values for AEPs as low as 0.005 microns peak-to-peak (p-p) water displacement calculated at the skin surface (Fig. 6). 3. AEP-responses to a vibrating sphere stimulus recorded in the MON are tonic or phasic-tonic, i.e., responses are strongest at stimulus onset but last for the whole stimulus duration in form of a frequency following response (Fig. 3). DMN and AN responses are phasic or phasic-tonic. Units recorded in the MON are phase coupled to the stimulus, those recorded in the DMN, AN or LTN are usually not (Figs. 5, 8, 9). Diencephalic LTN and telencephalic lateral line responses (AEPs) often are purely phasic. However, in the diencephalic LTN tonic and/or off-responses can be recorded (Fig. 11). 4. For the frequencies 25, 50, and 100 Hz, the dynamic intensity range of lateral line areas varies from 12.8 to at least 91.6 dB (AEP) respectively 8.9 and 92 dB (few unit and single unit recordings) (Fig. 7). 5. Mesencephalic, diencephalic, and telecephalic RFs, based on the evaluation of AEPs or multiunit activity (MUA), are usually contralateral (AN and LTN) or ipsi- and contralateral (telencephalon) and often complex (Figs. 10, 12, 16). 6. In many cases no obvious interactions between different modalities (vibrating sphere, electric field stimulus, and/or a light flash) were seen. However, some recording sites in the mesencephalic AN and the diencephalic LTN showed bimodal interactions in that an electric field stimulus decreased or increased the amplitude of a lateral line response and vice versa (Fig. 13 B).     

Modeling and measuring lateral line excitation patterns to changing dipole source locations

In order to determine excitation patterns to the lateral line system from a nearby 50 Hz oscillating sphere, dipole flow field equations were used to model the spatial distribution of pressures along a linear array of lateral line canal pores. Modeled predictions were then compared to pressure distributions measured for the same dipole source with a miniature hydrophone placed in a small test tank used for neurophysiological experiments. Finally, neural responses from posterior lateral line nerve fibers in the goldfish were measured in the test tank to demonstrate that modeled and measured pressure gradient patterns were encoded by the lateral line periphery. Response patterns to a 50 Hz dipole source that slowly changed location along the length of the fish included (1) peaks and valleys in spike-rate responses corresponding to changes in pressure gradient amplitudes, (2) 180° phase-shifts corresponding to reversals in the direction of the pressure gradient and (3) distance-dependent changes in the locations of peaks, valleys and 180° phase-shifts. Modeled pressure gradient patterns also predict that the number of neural amplitude peaks and phase transitions will vary as a function of neuromast orientation and axis of source oscillation. The faithful way in which the lateral line periphery encodes pressure gradient patterns has implications for how source location and distance might be encoded by excitation patterns in the CNS. Phase-shift information may be important for (1) inhibitory/excitatory sculpting of receptive fields and (2) unambiguously encoding source distance so that increases in source distance are not confused with decreases in source amplitude.     

Behavioural responses of juvenile cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) to local water movements

Physiological studies have shown that the epidermal head and arm lines in cephalopods are a mechanoreceptive system that is similar to the fish and amphibian lateral lines (Budelmann BU, Bleckmann H. 1988. A lateral line analogue in cephalopods: Water waves generate microphonic potentials in the epidermal head lines of Sepia officinalis and Lolliguncula brevis. J. Comp. Physiol. A 164:1-5.); however, the biological significance of the epidermal lines remains unclear. To test whether cuttlefish show behavioural responses to local water movements, juvenile Sepia officinalis were exposed to local sinusoidal water movements of different frequencies (0.01-1000 Hz) produced by a vibrating sphere. Five behavioural responses were recorded: body pattern changing, moving, burrowing, orienting, and swimming. Cuttlefish responded to a wide range of frequencies (20-600 Hz), but not to all of the frequencies tested within that range. No habituation to repeated stimuli was seen. Results indicate that cuttlefish can detect local water movements (most likely with the epidermal head and arm lines) and are able to integrate that information into behavioural responses.     

Sensory integration in the hydrodynamic world of rainbow trout

Water movements, of both abiotic and biotic origin, provide a wealth of information for fishes. They detect these water movements by arrays of hydrodynamic sensors located on the surface of the body as superficial neuromasts and embedded in subdermal lateral line canals. Recently, the anatomical dichotomy between superficial and canal neuromasts has been matched by demonstrations of a corresponding functional dichotomy. Superficial neuromasts are sensitive to water flows over the surface of the fish and are the sub-modality that participates in orientation to water currents, a behaviour known as rheotaxis. The canal neuromasts are sensitive to water vibration and it is this sub-modality that determines the localization of artificial prey. Recently, however, it has been shown that the complex behaviour of natural prey capture in the dark requires input from both lateral line sensory submodalities and here we show that the ability of trout to hold station behind a stationary object in fast flowing water also requires integration of information from both sub-modalities.     

Lateral line stimulation patterns and prey orienting behavior in the Lake Michigan mottled sculpin (Cottus bairdi)

Information contained in the spatial excitation pattern along arrayed sensors in the lateral line system of Lake Michigan mottled sculpin, as well as other surface-feeding fish and amphibians, is thought to play a fundamental role in guiding prey-orienting behaviors. However, the way in which prey location is encoded by the excitation pattern and used by the nervous system to direct orienting behaviors is largely unknown. In this study, we test the hypothesis that mottled sculpin use excitation peaks (local ‘hot spots’) to determine the somatotopic location of an artificial prey (vibrating sphere/dipole source) along the body surface. Dipole orientation (axis of sphere vibration re: long axis of the fish) is manipulated to produce excitatory peaks in different body locations without changing the actual sphere location. Our results show that orienting accuracy is largely independent of source orientation, but not source distance and that turning directions are not guided by local hot spots in the somatotopic activation pattern of the lateral line.