The mycobacterial Mpa–proteasome unfolds and degrades pupylated substrates by engaging Pup's N‐terminus

Mycobacterium tuberculosis, along with other actinobacteria, harbours proteasomes in addition to members of the general bacterial repertoire of degradation complexes. In analogy to ubiquitination in eukaryotes, substrates are tagged for proteasomal degradation with prokaryotic ubiquitin‐like protein (Pup) that is recognized by the N‐terminal coiled‐coil domain of the ATPase Mpa (also called ARC). Here, we reconstitute the entire mycobacterial proteasome degradation system for pupylated substrates and establish its mechanistic features with respect to substrate recruitment, unfolding and degradation. We show that the Mpa–proteasome complex unfolds and degrades Pup‐tagged proteins and that this activity requires physical interaction of the ATPase with the proteasome. Furthermore, we establish the N‐terminal region of Pup as the structural element required for engagement of pupylated substrates into the Mpa pore. In this process, Mpa pulls on Pup to initiate unfolding of substrate proteins and to drag them toward the proteasome chamber. Unlike the eukaryotic ubiquitin, Pup is not recycled but degraded with the substrate. This assigns a dual function to Pup as both the Mpa recognition element as well as the threading determinant.     

Dop functions as a depupylase in the prokaryotic ubiquitin‐like modification pathway

Post‐translational modification of proteins with prokaryotic ubiquitin‐like protein (Pup) is the bacterial equivalent of ubiquitination in eukaryotes. Mycobacterial pupylation is a two‐step process in which the carboxy‐terminal glutamine of Pup is first deamidated by Dop (deamidase of Pup) before ligation of the generated γ‐carboxylate to substrate lysines by the Pup ligase PafA. In this study, we identify a new feature of the pupylation system by demonstrating that Dop also acts as a depupylase in the Pup proteasome system in vivo and in vitro. Dop removes Pup from substrates by specific cleavage of the isopeptide bond. Depupylation can be enhanced by the unfolding activity of the mycobacterial proteasomal ATPase Mpa.     

Pupylated proteins in Corynebacterium glutamicum revealed by MudPIT analysis

In a manner similar to ubiquitin, the prokaryotic ubiquitin‐like protein (Pup) has been shown to target proteins for degradation via the proteasome in mycobacteria. However, not all actinobacteria possessing the Pup protein also contain a proteasome. In this study, we set out to study pupylation in the proteasome‐lacking non‐pathogenic model organism Corynebacterium glutamicum. A defined pup deletion mutant of C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 grew aerobically as the parent strain in standard glucose minimal medium, indicating that pupylation is dispensable under these conditions. After expression of a Pup derivative carrying an aminoterminal polyhistidine tag in the Δpup mutant and Ni²⁺‐chelate affinity chromatography, pupylated proteins were isolated. Multidimensional protein identification technology (MudPIT) and MALDI‐TOF‐MS/MS of the elution fraction unraveled 55 proteins being pupylated in C. glutamicum and 66 pupylation sites. Similar to mycobacteria, the majority of pupylated proteins are involved in metabolism or translation. Our results define the first pupylome of an actinobacterial species lacking a proteasome, confirming that other fates besides proteasomal degradation are possible for pupylated proteins.     

Molecular analysis of the prokaryotic ubiquitin‐like protein (Pup) conjugation pathway in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Proteins targeted for degradation by the Mycobacterium proteasome are post‐translationally tagged with prokaryotic ubiquitin‐like protein (Pup), an intrinsically disordered protein of 64 residues. In a process termed ‘pupylation’, Pup is synthesized with a terminal glutamine, which is deamidated to glutamate by Dop (deamidase of Pup) prior to attachment to substrate lysines by proteasome accessory factor A (PafA). Importantly, PafA was previously shown to be essential to cause lethal infections by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) in mice. In this study we show that Dop, like PafA, is required for the full virulence of Mtb. Additionally, we show that Dop is not only involved in the deamidation of Pup, but also needed to maintain wild‐type steady state levels of pupylated proteins in Mtb. Finally, using structural models and site‐directed mutagenesis our data suggest that Dop and PafA are members of the glutamine synthetase fold family of proteins.     

Deletion of dop in Mycobacterium smegmatis abolishes pupylation of protein substrates in vivo

Proteasome‐bearing bacteria make use of a ubiquitin‐like modification pathway to target proteins for proteasomal turnover. In a process termed pupylation, proteasomal substrates are covalently modified with the small protein Pup that serves as a degradation signal. Pup is attached to substrate proteins by action of PafA. Prior to its attachment, Pup needs to undergo deamidation at its C‐terminal residue, converting glutamine to glutamate. This step is catalysed in vitro by Dop. In order to characterize Dop activity in vivo, we generated a dop deletion mutant in Mycobacterium smegmatis. In the Δdop strain, pupylation is severely impaired and the steady‐state levels of two known proteasomal substrates are drastically increased. Pupylation can be re‐established by complementing the mutant with either DopWt or a Pup variant carrying a glutamate at its ultimate C‐terminal position (PupGGE). Our data show that Pup is deamidated by Dop in vivo and that likely Dop alone is responsible for this activity. Furthermore, we demonstrate that a putative N‐terminal ATP‐binding motif is crucial for catalysis, as a single point mutation (E10A) in this motif abolishes Dop activity both in vivo and in vitro.     

Proteasome accessory factor A (PafA) transferase activity makes sense in the light of its homology with glutamine synthetase

The Pup-proteasome system (PPS) is a prokaryotic tagging and degradation system analogous in function to the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). Like ubiquitin, Pup is conjugated to proteins, tagging them for proteasomal degradation. However, in the PPS, a single Pup-ligase, PafA, conjugates Pup to a wide variety of proteins. PafA couples ATP hydrolysis to formation of an isopeptide bond between Pup and a protein lysine via a mechanism similar to that used by glutamine synthetase (GS) to generate glutamine from ammonia and glutamate. GS can also transfer the glutamyl moiety from glutamine to a hydroxyl amine in an ATP-independent manner. Recently, the ability of PafA to transfer Pup from one protein to another was demonstrated. Here, we report that such PafA activity mechanistically resembles the transferase activity of GS. Both PafA and GS transferase activities are ATP-independent and proceed in two catalytic steps. In the first step catalyzed by PafA, an inorganic phosphate is used by the enzyme to depupylate a Pup donor, while forming an acyl phosphate Pup intermediate. The second step consists of Pup conjugation to the new protein, alongside the release of an inorganic phosphate. Detailed experimental analysis, combined with kinetic modeling of PafA transferase activity, allowed us to correctly predict the kinetics and magnitude of Pup transfer between two targets, and analyze the effects of their affinity to PafA on the efficiency of transfer. By deciphering the mechanism of the PafA transferase reaction in kinetic detail, this work provides in-depth mechanistic understanding of PafA, a key PPS enzyme.     

Survival of mycobacteria depends on proteasome‐mediated amino acid recycling under nutrient limitation

Intracellular protein degradation is an essential process in all life domains. While in all eukaryotes regulated protein degradation involves ubiquitin tagging and the 26S‐proteasome, bacterial prokaryotic ubiquitin‐like protein (Pup) tagging and proteasomes are conserved only in species belonging to the phyla Actinobacteria and Nitrospira. In Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the Pup‐proteasome system (PPS) is important for virulence, yet its physiological role in non‐pathogenic species has remained an enigma. We now report, using Mycobacterium smegmatis as a model organism, that the PPS is essential for survival under starvation. Upon nitrogen limitation, PPS activity is induced, leading to accelerated tagging and degradation of many cytoplasmic proteins. We suggest a model in which the PPS functions to recycle amino acids under nitrogen starvation, thereby enabling the cell to maintain basal metabolic activities. We also find that the PPS auto‐regulates its own activity via pupylation and degradation of its components in a manner that promotes the oscillatory expression of PPS components. As such, the destructive activity of the PPS is carefully balanced to maintain cellular functions during starvation.     

Prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein remains intrinsically disordered when covalently attached to proteasomal target proteins

Background

The post-translational modification pathway referred to as pupylation marks proteins for proteasomal degradation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and other actinobacteria by covalently attaching the small protein Pup (prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein) to target lysine residues. In contrast to the functionally analogous eukaryotic ubiquitin, Pup is intrinsically disordered in its free form. Its unfolded state allows Pup to adopt different structures upon interaction with different binding partners like the Pup ligase PafA and the proteasomal ATPase Mpa. While the disordered behavior of free Pup has been well characterized, it remained unknown whether Pup adopts a distinct structure when attached to a substrate.

Results

Using a combination of NMR experiments and biochemical analysis we demonstrate that Pup remains unstructured when ligated to two well-established pupylation substrates targeted for proteasomal degradation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, malonyl transacylase (FabD) and ketopantoyl hydroxylmethyltransferase (PanB). Isotopically labeled Pup was linked to FabD and PanB by in vitro pupylation to generate homogeneously pupylated substrates suitable for NMR analysis. The single target lysine of PanB was identified by a combination of mass spectroscopy and mutational analysis. Chemical shift comparison between Pup in its free form and ligated to substrate reveals intrinsic disorder of Pup in the conjugate.

Conclusion

When linked to the proteasomal substrates FabD and PanB, Pup is unstructured and retains the ability to interact with its different binding partners. This suggests that it is not the conformation of Pup attached to these two substrates which determines their delivery to the proteasome, but the availability of the degradation complex and the depupylase.

     

Prokaryotic Ubiquitin-Like Protein Pup Is Intrinsically Disordered

The prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein Pup targets substrates for degradation by the Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteasome through its interaction with Mpa, an ATPase that is thought to abut the 20S catalytic subunit. Ubiquitin, which is assembled into a polymer to similarly signal for proteasomal degradation in eukaryotes, adopts a stable and compact structural fold that is adapted into other proteins for diverse biological functions. We used NMR spectroscopy to demonstrate that, unlike ubiquitin, the 64-amino-acid protein Pup is intrinsically disordered with small helical propensity in the C-terminal region. We found that the Pup:Mpa interaction involves an extensive contact surface that spans S21-K61 and that the binding is in the “slow exchange” regime on the NMR time scale, thus demonstrating higher affinity than most ubiquitin:ubiquitin receptor pairs. Interestingly, during the titration experiment, intermediate Pup species were observable, suggesting the formation of one or more transient state(s) upon binding. Moreover, Mpa selected one configuration for a region undergoing chemical exchange in the free protein. These findings provide mechanistic insights into Pup's functional role as a degradation signal.     

In‐Cell NMR Spectroscopy of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

This review summarizes the results of in‐cell Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, NMR, spectroscopic investigations of the eukaryotic and prokaryotic intrinsically disordered proteins, IDPs: α‐synuclein, prokaryotic ubiquitin‐like protein, Pup, tubulin‐related neuronal protein, Tau, phenylalanyl‐glycyl‐repeat‐rich nucleoporins, FG Nups, and the negative regulator of flagellin synthesis, FlgM. The results show that the cellular behavior of IDPs may differ significantly from that observed in the test tube.     

Neddylation dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease

Ubiquitin‐dependent proteolysis is a major mechanism that downregulates misfolded proteins or those that have finished a programmed task. In the last two decades, neddylation has emerged as a major regulatory pathway for ubiquitination. Central to the neddylation pathway is the amyloid precursor protein (APP)‐binding protein APP‐BP1, which together with Uba3, plays an analogous role to the ubiquitin‐activating enzyme E1 in nedd8 activation. Activated nedd8 covalently modifies and activates a major class of ubiquitin ligases called Cullin‐RING ligases (CRLs). New evidence suggests that neddylation also modifies Type‐1 transmembrane receptors such as APP. Here we review the functions of neddylation and summarize evidence suggesting that dysfunction of neddylation is involved in Alzheimer's disease.     

E2-binding surface on Uba3 β-grasp domain undergoes a conformational transition

The covalent attachment of ubiquitin (Ub) and ubiquitin‐like (Ubl) proteins to various eukaryotic targets plays critical roles in regulating numerous cellular processes. E1‐activating enzymes are critical, because they catalyze activation of their cognate Ub/Ubl protein and are responsible for its transfer to the correct E2‐conjugating enzyme(s). The activating enzyme for neural‐precursor‐cell‐expressed developmentally downregulated 8 (NEDD8) is a heterodimer composed of APPBP1 and Uba3 subunits. The carboxyl terminal ubiquitin‐like β‐grasp domain of human Uba3 (Uba3‐βGD) has been suggested as a key E2‐binding site defining E2 specificity. In crystal structures of free E1 and the NEDD8‐E1 complex, the E2‐binding surface on the domain was missing from the electron density. However, when complexed with various E2s, this missing segment adopts a kinked α‐helix. Here, we demonstrate that Uba3‐βGD is an independently folded domain in solution and that residues involved in E2 binding are absent from the NMR spectrum, indicating that the E2‐binding surface on Uba3‐βGD interconverts between multiple conformations, analogous to a similar conformational transition observed in the E2‐binding surface of SUMO E1. These results suggest that access to multiple conformational substates is an important feature of the E1–E2 interaction. Proteins 2012;. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Unraveling the biochemistry and provenance of pupylation: a prokaryotic analog of ubiquitination

   

Recently Mycobacterium tuberculosis was shown to possess a novel protein modification, in which a small protein Pup is conjugated to the epsilon-amino groups of lysines in target proteins. Analogous to ubiquitin modification in eukaryotes, this remarkable modification recruits proteins for degradation via archaeal-type proteasomes found in mycobacteria and allied actinobacteria. While a mycobacterial protein named PafA was found to be required for this conjugation reaction, its biochemical mechanism has not been elucidated. Using sensitive sequence profile comparison methods we establish that the PafA family proteins are related to the γ-glutamyl-cysteine synthetase and glutamine synthetase. Hence, we predict that PafA is the Pup ligase, which catalyzes the ATP-dependent ligation of the terminal γ-carboxylate of glutamate to lysines, similar to the above enzymes. We further discovered that an ortholog of the eukaryotic PAC2 (e.g. cg2106) is often present in the vicinity of the actinobacterial Pup-proteasome gene neighborhoods and is likely to represent the ancestral proteasomal chaperone. Pup-conjugation is sporadically present outside the actinobacteria in certain lineages, such as verrucomicrobia, nitrospirae, deltaproteobacteria and planctomycetes, and in the latter two lineages it might modify membrane proteins.     

Developing rice with high yield under phosphorus deficiency: Pup1 sequence to application

The major quantitative trait locus (QTL) Phosphorus uptake1 (Pup1) confers tolerance of phosphorus deficiency in soil and is currently one of the most promising QTLs for the development of tolerant rice (Oryza sativa) varieties. To facilitate targeted introgression of Pup1 into intolerant varieties, the gene models predicted in the Pup1 region in the donor variety Kasalath were used to develop gene-based molecular markers that are evenly distributed over the fine-mapped 278-kb QTL region. To validate the gene models and optimize the markers, gene expression analyses and partial allelic sequencing were conducted. The markers were tested in more than 80 diverse rice accessions revealing three main groups with different Pup1 allele constitution. Accessions with tolerant (group I) and intolerant (group III) Pup1 alleles were distinguished from genotypes with Kasalath alleles at some of the analyzed loci (partial Pup1; group II). A germplasm survey additionally confirmed earlier data showing that Pup1 is largely absent from irrigated rice varieties but conserved in varieties and breeding lines adapted to drought-prone environments. A core set of Pup1 markers has been defined, and sequence polymorphisms suitable for single-nucleotide polymorphism marker development for high-throughput genotyping were identified. Following a marker-assisted backcrossing approach, Pup1 was introgressed into two irrigated rice varieties and three Indonesian upland varieties. First phenotypic evaluations of the introgression lines suggest that Pup1 is effective in different genetic backgrounds and environments and that it has the potential to significantly enhance grain yield under field conditions.     

A further case of Dop‐ing in bacterial pupylation

Two recent studies, one in this issue of EMBO reports and one in Molecular Cell, identify Dop as a depupylase, ascribing a novel function to Dop and providing further evidence for the functional similarity of the prokaryotic Pup-modification system and the eukaryotic ubiquitin system.EMBO Rep (2010) advance online publication. doi: 10.1038/embor.2010.119Protein homeostasis is fundamental to the function of all cellular systems. In eukaryotes, the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway mediates regulated protein degradation. Intensive studies of the eukaryotic proteasome over the past decades have unravelled the complexity of this multi-subunit, ATP-dependent protease, and proteasome inhibitors are now established anticancer drugs (Finley, 2009). Prokaryotes use ATP-dependent proteases—such as Lon, ClpP and FtsH—for protein degradation. In addition, some bacteria in the class of Actinomycetes have acquired a proteasome which shares sequence and structural homology with its eukaryotic counterpart (Darwin, 2009). The function of the prokaryotic proteasome and its implication in pathogenesis is the subject of ongoing research. In Mycobacterium tuberculosis, proteasome activity is essential for the pathogen to persist in macrophages of the lung epithelium and could therefore be a target for antimicrobial treatment (Darwin, 2009).Labelling substrates for proteasomal degradation is well understood in eukaryotes, in which ubiquitin is attached to proteins that are subsequently recognized by proteasomal subunits and degraded (Finley, 2009). A similar tagging system has recently been identified in M. tuberculosis, in which the prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein (Pup) serves as a ubiquitin analogue (Pearce et al, 2008). Subsequent proteome-wide studies have identified hundreds of Pup-tagged substrates in different mycobacteria, defining the ‘pupylome'' (Festa et al, 2010; Poulsen et al, 2010). Pupylated proteins are recognized by the proteasome-associated ATPase Mpa, that unfolds proteins before they are degraded in the proteolytic core (Darwin, 2009).Ubiquitination is reversed by specific deubiquitinases, but whether pupylation is also reversible was previously unknown. Two studies by Darwin and colleagues and—in this issue of EMBO reports—by Weber-Ban and colleagues have now demonstrated that Pup is removed from substrates when incubated with mycobacterial lysates (Burns et al, 2010; Imkamp et al, 2010). This suggests the presence of one or more ‘depupylases'', and indicates that pupylation is a complex and versatile process, much like ubiquitination.Pup and ubiquitin conjugation are mechanistically unrelated; ubiquitin is ligated by its carboxy-terminal glycine residue to lysine residues of target proteins by an enzymatic cascade, comprising E1, E2 and E3 enzymes (Dye & Schulman, 2007). By contrast, the pupylation machinery seems to be simpler; a single ligating enzyme, proteasome accessory factor A (PafA), mediates isopeptide bond formation between the C-terminal glutamic acid side-chain carboxyl group of Pup and a substrate lysine residue (Sutter et al, 2010).Only about half of the Pup-containing bacteria encode a glutamic acid residue at the C-terminus (Striebel et al, 2009). In the remaining species, including M. tuberculosis, the Pup gene encodes a C-terminal glutamine, which requires deamidation to glutamic acid before conjugation to substrates can occur. This activating deamidation step is carried out by the deamidase of Pup (Dop; Striebel et al, 2009). Curiously, the dop gene is conserved in all Pup-containing bacterial species (with the exception of Plesiocystis pacifica), including those in which initial deamidation is unnecessary.Imkamp et al and Burns et al now identify Dop as a depupylase in the Pup-modification pathway. Hydrolysis of Pup from model substrates in vitro is abolished in a dop-deficient bacterial lysate, or in lysate expressing a mutant form of dop, but can be restored by complementation with dop. Dop is able to depupylate many proteins when tested against the pupylome, suggesting a broad substrate spectrum. By contrast, without Dop the pupylome is unchanged over time, indicating that Dop might be the main depupylase in Mycobacteria. Purified Dop from M. tuberculosis shows depupylase activity against model substrates. Finally, Imkamp et al analyse a Dop homologue from Corynebacterium glutamicum that encodes Pup^Glu and hence does not depend on deamidation. This Dop homologue is expressed recombinantly and purified from Escherichia coli—which does not harbour the Pup-proteasome system—and shown to be an active depupylase in vitro.Both groups then investigated the functional relationship between Pup/Dop and the proteasomal ATPase Mpa. Burns et al found that Mpa is required in vivo for depupylation of a proteasome substrate. Imkamp et al found that Mpa significantly increases depupylation activity in vitro. The mechanism for this remains unclear, but full-length Pup seems to be essential for Mpa-mediated activation, as depupylation is not enhanced with an amino-terminally truncated Pup. Previous work has indicated that the N-terminus of Pup is required to initiate substrate unfolding (Striebel et al, 2010), and Imkamp et al speculated that unfolding makes the isopeptide bond more accessible for interaction with Dop. Evidence for this comes from the observation that Dop can cleave a peptide substrate with an accessible isopeptide bond at the same rate in the presence or absence of Mpa. It is intriguing that Dop co-purifies with the pupylome (Burns et al, 2010), this suggests that Dop has significant affinity but low activity for pupylated substrates. This might, however, prime the system for depupylation after Mpa interaction.Corynebacteria do not have a proteasome, but maintain the pupylation machinery comprising Pup, PafA, Dop and the proteasomal ATPase ARC (a homologue of Mpa). Here, the fate of Pup-tagged proteins cannot be proteasomal degradation, although substrate unfolding by ARC could initiate degradation by other proteases. However, pupylation in proteasome-deficient bacteria might suggest additional non-degradative functions for pupylation.Both studies demonstrate that Dop acts as a depupylase in Pup-containing bacteria, in addition to the previously reported deamidation role of Dop in mycobacteria. In fact, the chemical reactions underlying depupylation and deamidation are mechanistically similar. The key functional question that remains is whether Dop protects substrates from proteasomal degradation. Alternative explanations are that Dop acts in conjunction with Mpa or the proteasome to recycle Pup, or that it reverses non-degradative roles of pupylation (Fig 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Emerging roles for Dop. (A) The pupylation system. (1) Dop functions as a deamidase, converting Pup^Gln to Pup^Glu. PafA ligates Pup^Glu to substrates, which are targeted to Mpa and the proteasome and are degraded. (2) Dop can reverse pupylation on substrates and might rescue substrates from degradation. (B) Dop might act to recycle Pup, either (3a) at the Mpa/proteasome level or (3b) by binding to pupylated substrates, where Mpa-mediated substrate unfolding activates Dop. (C) (4) The existence of Dop in proteasome deficient bacteria might indicate that Dop antagonizes non-degradational roles for Pup. Dop, deamidase of Pup; Mpa, Mycobacterium proteasome-associated ATPase; PafA, proteasome accessory factor A; Pup, prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein.So far, nothing is known about the regulation of Dop. It will be interesting to analyse expression profiles to determine whether Dop is regulated independently of other proteins in this system. Other open questions remain about the existence of co-factors and binding partners, and the organization of the Pup–Dop–Mpa network. Structural studies of the Dop enzyme will hopefully increase our understanding of its roles in depupylation.In conclusion, Dop in the pupylation system has the potential to combine all known functions of deubiquitinases in the ubiquitin system: processing of precursors, rescuing substrates from degradation, recycling the modifier and reversing potential non-degradative roles of pupylation. The identification of the first depupylase opens an exciting new research field to unravel the functional consequences of depupylation.     

Cezanne/OTUD7B is a cell cycle‐regulated deubiquitinase that antagonizes the degradation of APC/C substrates

The anaphase‐promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) is an E3 ubiquitin ligase and key regulator of cell cycle progression. Since APC/C promotes the degradation of mitotic cyclins, it controls cell cycle‐dependent oscillations in cyclin‐dependent kinase (CDK) activity. Both CDKs and APC/C control a large number of substrates and are regulated by analogous mechanisms, including cofactor‐dependent activation. However, whereas substrate dephosphorylation is known to counteract CDK, it remains largely unknown whether deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) antagonize APC/C substrate ubiquitination during mitosis. Here, we demonstrate that Cezanne/OTUD7B is a cell cycle‐regulated DUB that opposes the ubiquitination of APC/C targets. Cezanne is remarkably specific for K11‐linked ubiquitin chains, which are formed by APC/C in mitosis. Accordingly, Cezanne binds established APC/C substrates and reverses their APC/C‐mediated ubiquitination. Cezanne depletion accelerates APC/C substrate degradation and causes errors in mitotic progression and formation of micronuclei. These data highlight the importance of tempered APC/C substrate destruction in maintaining chromosome stability. Furthermore, Cezanne is recurrently amplified and overexpressed in numerous malignancies, suggesting a potential role in genome maintenance and cancer cell proliferation.     

Mycobacterial ubiquitin-like protein ligase PafA follows a two-step reaction pathway with a phosphorylated pup intermediate

In Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the enzyme PafA is responsible for the activation and conjugation of the proteasome-targeting molecule Pup to protein substrates. As the proteasomal pathway has been shown to be vital to the persistence of M. tuberculosis, understanding the reaction mechanism of PafA is critical to the design of antituberculous agents. In this study, we have developed novel techniques to study the activity of PafA and have characterized fundamental features of the reaction mechanism. We show that PafA catalyzes a two-step reaction mechanism proceeding through a γ-glutamyl phosphate-mixed anhydride intermediate that is formed on the C-terminal glutamate of Pup before transfer of Pup to the substrate acceptor lysine. SDS-PAGE analysis of formation of the phosphorylated intermediate revealed that the rate of Pup activation matched the maximal steady-state rate of product formation in the overall reaction and suggested that Pup activation was rate-limiting when all substrates were present at saturating concentrations. Following activation, both ADP and the phosphorylated intermediate remained associated with the enzyme awaiting nucleophilic attack by a lysine residue of the target protein. The PafA reaction mechanism appeared to be noticeably biased toward the stable activation of Pup in the absence of additional substrate and required very low concentrations of ATP and Pup relative to other carboxylate-amine/ammonia ligase family members. The bona fide nucleophilic substrate PanB showed a 3 orders of magnitude stronger affinity than free lysine, promoting Pup conjugation to occur close to the rate limit of activation with physiologically relevant concentrations of substrate.     

Erratum to: Development and application of gene-based markers for the major rice QTL Phosphorus uptake 1

Marker-assisted breeding is a very useful tool for breeders but still lags behind its potential because information on the effect of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) in different genetic backgrounds and ideal molecular markers are unavailable. Here, we report on some first steps toward the validation and application of the major rice QTL Phosphate uptake 1 (Pup1) that confers tolerance of phosphorus (P) deficiency in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Based on the Pup1 genomic sequence of the tolerant donor variety Kasalath that recently became available, markers were designed that target (1) putative genes that are partially conserved in the Nipponbare reference genome and (2) Kasalath-specific genes that are located in a large insertion-deletion (INDEL) region that is absent in Nipponbare. Testing these markers in 159 diverse rice accessions confirmed their diagnostic value across genotypes and showed that Pup1 is present in more than 50% of rice accessions adapted to stress-prone environments, whereas it was detected in only about 10% of the analyzed irrigated/lowland varieties. Furthermore, the Pup1 locus was detected in more than 80% of the analyzed drought-tolerant rice breeding lines, suggesting that breeders are unknowingly selecting for Pup1. A hydroponics experiment revealed genotypic differences in the response to P deficiency between upland and irrigated varieties but confirmed that root elongation is independent of Pup1. Contrasting Pup1 near-isogenic lines (NILs) were subsequently grown in two different P-deficient soils and environments. Under the applied aerobic growth conditions, NILs with the Pup1 locus maintained significantly higher grain weight plant⁻¹ under P deprivation in comparison with intolerant sister lines without Pup1. Overall, the data provide evidence that Pup1 has the potential to improve yield in P-deficient and/or drought-prone environments and in diverse genetic backgrounds.