Validation of endogenous controls for gene expression studies in human adipocytes and preadipocytes.

Quantitative gene expression protocols require adequate controls to monitor intersample variation. Quantitative approaches to describe relative changes in gene expression use endogenous controls--"housekeeping" genes. Given the low amounts of mRNA in fat cells, RT-PCR is the method of choice, and housekeeping genes are widely used as endogenous controls. However, literature reports suggest changes in gene expression of typical housekeeping genes (e. g. GAPDH, beta-actin, 18S rRNA) upon hormonal stimulation or during adipogenic differentiation. Thus, we tested the influence of 6 hormones and adipogenic differentiation on gene expression levels of 11 commonly used housekeeping genes in primary cultured mature human adipocytes and preadipocytes. Using the TaqMan RT-PCR technique and "Human Endogenous Control Assays" (PE Biosystems), we found several housekeeping genes with at least twice the difference in expression levels between stimulated and unstimulated cells (such as acidic ribosomal protein, beta-actin, beta(2)-microglobulin and beta-glucuronidase). Only GAPDH and transferrin receptor gene expression levels did not change under any of the stimuli tested, thus appeared best suited for gene expression studies in human adipose cells across a wide range of experimental settings.     

State‐of‐the‐art housekeeping proteins for quantitative western blotting: Revisiting the first draft of the human proteome

Western blotting (WB) analysis is the most popular and widely used methodology for protein detection and characterization over recent decades. In accordance with the advancement of the technologies for the acquisition of WB signals, a quantitative value is used to present the abundance of target proteins in a complex sample, thereby requiring the use of specific proteins as internal references that represent total proteins. Heretofore, proteins encoded by housekeeping genes such as GAPDH, β‐tubulin and β‐actin have been commonly used as loading controls without any hesitation because their mRNA expression levels tend to be high and constant in many different cells and tissues. Experimentally, however, some of the housekeeping reference proteins are often displayed with inconsistent expression levels in both homogeneous and heterogeneous tissues, and, in terms of mRNA levels, they have a weak correlation to the abundance of proteins. To estimate accurate, reliable, and reproducible protein quantifications, it is crucial to define appropriate reference controls. For this paper, we explored the recently released large‐scale, human proteomic database ProteomicsDB including 16 857 liquid chromatography tandem‐mass‐spectrometry data from 27 human tissues, and suggest 20 ubiquitously‐ and constitutively‐expressed, putative internal‐reference controls for the quantification of differential protein expressions. Intriguingly, the most commonly used, known housekeeping genes were entirely excluded in our newly defined candidates. Although the applications of the candidates under many different biological conditions and in other organisms are yet to be empirically verified, we propose reliable, potential loading controls for a WB analysis in this paper.     

Evaluating reference genes to normalize gene expression in human epileptogenic brain tissues

Several reference genes have been used to quantify gene expression in human epilepsy surgery tissue. However, their reliability has not been validated in detail, although this is crucial in interpreting epilepsy-related changes of gene expression. We evaluated 12 potential reference genes in neocortical tissues resected from patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) with either few or many seizures (n=6 each) and post mortem controls (n=6) using geNorm and NormFinder algorithms. For all candidate reference genes threshold cycle (C(T)) values were measured. geNorm analysis revealed that the expression of e.g. glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl-transferase (HPRT) is unstable, whereas synaptophysin (SYP) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE)/mitochondrial 39S ribosomal protein L28 (MRPL) are most stably expressed. The geometric mean of SYP, NSE and MRPL levels is recommended as normalization factor (NF). NormFinder analysis, in contrast, indicated HPRT as the most stable single gene and recommended the geometric mean of TATA-box binding protein (TBP) and NSE levels as NF. Different values of upregulation of glial fibrillary protein (GFAP) expression were found in TLE tissue compared to control tissue depending on the NF used: 4.5-fold (geNorm-NF), 4.7-fold (NormFinder-NF), 4.2-fold (vs. GAPDH) and 7.8-fold (vs. HPRT). The expression of GABA(A) receptor subunit α5 (GARα5) was unaltered in the TLE groups compared to controls (geNorm-NF, NormFinder-NF, vs. GAPDH). However, normalization to HPRT suggests an apparent increase of GARα5 expression. In conclusion, the geNorm-NF (SYP/NSE/MRPL) and the NormFinder-NF (TBP/NSE) are equally suitable for normalization of gene expression in the human epileptogenic neocortex. In contrast, normalization to single and probably less stably expressed genes may not deliver accurate results.     

The normalization of gene expression data in melanoma: investigating the use of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase and 18S ribosomal RNA as internal reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR

We examined a panel of 26 melanoma and fibroblast samples (tissues and cultured cells) to evaluate the suitability of two commonly used housekeeping genes, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA), for quantitative real-time PCR. Both genes showed significant variations within the individual cell line and tissue groups. Although no overall trends were observed in the expression of the 18S rRNA, GAPDH was up-regulated in melanoma tissue and cultured cells compared with the corresponding normal samples. In melanoma and fibroblast cell lines and tissues, absolute quantification appears to be more appropriate than normalizing messenger RNA (mRNA) expression via GAPDH or 18S rRNA housekeeping genes.     

Housekeeping proteins: How useful are they in skeletal muscle diabetes studies and muscle hypertrophy models?

The use of Western blot analysis is of great importance in research, and the measurement of housekeeping proteins is commonly used for loading controls. However, Ponceau S staining has been shown to be an alternative to analysis of housekeeping protein levels as loading controls in some conditions. In the current study, housekeeping protein levels were measured in skeletal muscle hypertrophy and streptozotocin-induced diabetes experimental models. The following housekeeping proteins were investigated: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), β-actin, α-tubulin, γ-tubulin, and α-actinin. Evidence is presented that Ponceau S is more reliable than housekeeping protein levels for specific protein quantifications in Western blot analysis.