Junction adhesion molecule is a receptor for reovirus

Virus attachment to cells plays an essential role in viral tropism and disease. Reovirus serotypes 1 and 3 differ in the capacity to target distinct cell types in the murine nervous system and in the efficiency to induce apoptosis. The binding of viral attachment protein sigma1 to unidentified receptors controls these phenotypes. We used expression cloning to identify junction adhesion molecule (JAM), an integral tight junction protein, as a reovirus receptor. JAM binds directly to sigma1 and permits reovirus infection of nonpermissive cells. Ligation of JAM is required for reovirus-induced activation of NF-kappaB and apoptosis. Thus, reovirus interaction with cell-surface receptors is a critical determinant of both cell-type specific tropism and virus-induced intracellular signaling events that culminate in cell death.     

Junctional adhesion molecule a serves as a receptor for prototype and field-isolate strains of mammalian reovirus

Reovirus infections are initiated by the binding of viral attachment protein sigma1 to receptors on the surface of host cells. The sigma1 protein is an elongated fiber comprised of an N-terminal tail that inserts into the virion and a C-terminal head that extends from the virion surface. The prototype reovirus strains type 1 Lang/53 (T1L/53) and type 3 Dearing/55 (T3D/55) use junctional adhesion molecule A (JAM-A) as a receptor. The C-terminal half of the T3D/55 sigma1 protein interacts directly with JAM-A, but the determinants of receptor-binding specificity have not been identified. In this study, we investigated whether JAM-A also mediates the attachment of the prototype reovirus strain type 2 Jones/55 (T2J/55) and a panel of field-isolate strains representing each of the three serotypes. Antibodies specific for JAM-A were capable of inhibiting infections of HeLa cells by T1L/53, T2J/55, and T3D/55, demonstrating that strains of all three serotypes use JAM-A as a receptor. To corroborate these findings, we introduced JAM-A or the structurally related JAM family members JAM-B and JAM-C into Chinese hamster ovary cells, which are poorly permissive for reovirus infection. Both prototype and field-isolate reovirus strains were capable of infecting cells transfected with JAM-A but not those transfected with JAM-B or JAM-C. A sequence analysis of the sigma1-encoding S1 gene segment of the strains chosen for study revealed little conservation in the deduced sigma1 amino acid sequences among the three serotypes. This contrasts markedly with the observed sequence variability within each serotype, which is confined to a small number of amino acids. Mapping of these residues onto the crystal structure of sigma1 identified regions of conservation and variability, suggesting a likely mode of JAM-A binding via a conserved surface at the base of the sigma1 head domain.     

Mutations in type 3 reovirus that determine binding to sialic acid are contained in the fibrous tail domain of viral attachment protein sigma1.

The reovirus attachment protein, sigma1, determines numerous aspects of reovirus-induced disease, including viral virulence, pathways of spread, and tropism for certain types of cells in the central nervous system. The sigma1 protein projects from the virion surface and consists of two distinct morphologic domains, a virion-distal globular domain known as the head and an elongated fibrous domain, termed the tail, which is anchored into the virion capsid. To better understand structure-function relationships of sigma1 protein, we conducted experiments to identify sequences in sigma1 important for viral binding to sialic acid, a component of the receptor for type 3 reovirus. Three serotype 3 reovirus strains incapable of binding sialylated receptors were adapted to growth in murine erythroleukemia (MEL) cells, in which sialic acid is essential for reovirus infectivity. MEL-adapted (MA) mutant viruses isolated by serial passage in MEL cells acquired the capacity to bind sialic acid-containing receptors and demonstrated a dependence on sialic acid for infection of MEL cells. Analysis of reassortant viruses isolated from crosses of an MA mutant virus and a reovirus strain that does not bind sialic acid indicated that the sigma1 protein is solely responsible for efficient growth of MA mutant viruses in MEL cells. The deduced sigma1 amino acid sequences of the MA mutant viruses revealed that each strain contains a substitution within a short region of sequence in the sigma1 tail predicted to form beta-sheet. These studies identify specific sequences that determine the capacity of reovirus to bind sialylated receptors and suggest a location for a sialic acid-binding domain. Furthermore, the results support a model in which type 3 sigma1 protein contains discrete receptor binding domains, one in the head and another in the tail that binds sialic acid.     

Beta1 integrin mediates internalization of mammalian reovirus

Reovirus infection is initiated by interactions between the attachment protein sigma1 and cell surface carbohydrate and junctional adhesion molecule A (JAM-A). Expression of a JAM-A mutant lacking a cytoplasmic tail in nonpermissive cells conferred full susceptibility to reovirus infection, suggesting that cell surface molecules other than JAM-A mediate viral internalization following attachment. The presence of integrin-binding sequences in reovirus outer capsid protein lambda2, which serves as the structural base for sigma1, suggests that integrins mediate reovirus endocytosis. A beta1 integrin-specific antibody, but not antibodies specific for other integrin subunits, inhibited reovirus infection of HeLa cells. Expression of a beta1 integrin cDNA, along with a cDNA encoding JAM-A, in nonpermissive chicken embryo fibroblasts conferred susceptibility to reovirus infection. Infectivity of reovirus was significantly reduced in beta1-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells in comparison to isogenic cells expressing beta1. However, reovirus bound equivalently to cells that differed in levels of beta1 expression, suggesting that beta1 integrins are involved in a postattachment entry step. Concordantly, uptake of reovirus virions into beta1-deficient cells was substantially diminished in comparison to viral uptake into beta1-expressing cells. These data provide evidence that beta1 integrin facilitates reovirus internalization and suggest that viral entry occurs by interactions of reovirus virions with independent attachment and entry receptors on the cell surface.     

Inhibition of reovirus type 3 binding to host cells by sialylated glycoproteins is mediated through the viral attachment protein.

The interaction of mammalian reoviruses with sialylated glycoproteins was studied and found to be highly serotype specific in that attachment of type 3 Dearing reovirus to murine L cell receptors could be strongly inhibited by bovine submaxillary mucin (BSM), fetuin, and alpha 1 acid glycoprotein, albeit at different efficiencies, whereas attachment of type 1 Lang reovirus was inhibited only by fetuin. We subsequently demonstrated, by using reassortants between type 3 and 1 reoviruses, that inhibition of reovirus attachment to cell receptors was specified by the viral attachment protein gene S1. Using a solid-phase binding assay, we further demonstrated that the ability of reovirus type 3 or reassortant 1HA3 and the inability of reovirus type 1 or reassortant 3HA1 to bind avidly to BSM was a property of the viral S1 genome segment and required the presence of sialic acid residues on BSM oligosaccharides. Taken together, these results demonstrated that there is a serotype-specific difference in the ability of the reovirus attachment protein, sigma 1, to interact with sialylated oligosaccharides of glycoproteins. Interaction of reovirus type 3 with sialylated oligosaccharides of BSM is dramatically affected by the degree of O-acetylation of their sialic acid residues, as indicated by the findings that chemical removal of O-acetyl groups stimulated reovirus type 3 attachment to BSM, whereas preferential removal of residues lacking or possessing reduced amounts of O-acetyl groups per sialic acid molecule with Vibrio cholerae sialidase abolished binding. We also demonstrated that BSM was 10 times more potent in inhibiting attachment of infectious reovirus to L cells than was V. cholerae-treated BSM. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that sialylated oligosaccharides on host cells or erythrocytes may act as binding sites or components of binding sites for type 3 reovirus through a specific interaction with the virus attachment protein.     

Characterization of a common high-affinity receptor for reovirus serotypes 1 and 3 on endothelial cells.

During viremia, viruses may be cleared from the bloodstream and taken up by specific organs. The uptake of virus from the bloodstream is dependent on the association of viral particles with endothelial cells that line the luminal surfaces of large and small blood vessels. To understand the nature of this interaction, we have studied the binding of reovirus serotypes 1 and 3 to these cells in vitro. Both serotypes of reovirus productively infected endothelial cells. By using [35S]methionine-biolabeled reovirus as a tracer ligand, we found that both viruses rapidly bind to endothelial cells and that equilibrium is reached after 4 h. The binding of the radiolabeled viruses was saturable and mediated by a homogeneous population of cellular receptors with very high affinity (Kd = 0.5 nM) for the virus ligands. Both serotypes bind to the same receptor, since the attachment of each radiolabeled serotype is inhibited by both the homologous and heterologous unlabeled virus. Exposure of labeled virus to monoclonal antibodies directed against the viral hemagglutinin (sigma 1 protein) inhibited binding, demonstrating that the attachment of reovirus to endothelial cells is mediated by the hemagglutinin for both serotypes. By using a novel ligand-blotting assay, the binding of both viruses to a 54,000-dalton protein could be demonstrated. The binding of each radiolabeled serotype to this protein was inhibited by the homologous and heterologous unlabeled serotype. By using cell fractionation after homogenization, we demonstrated that this 54-kilodalton protein is a membrane protein, in agreement with its proposed role as a cell surface receptor for reovirus serotypes 1 and 3.     

Reovirus binding determinants in junctional adhesion molecule-A

Junctional adhesion molecule-A (JAM-A) serves as a serotype-independent receptor for mammalian orthoreoviruses (reoviruses). The membrane-distal immunoglobulin-like D1 domain of JAM-A is required for homodimerization and binding to reovirus attachment protein sigma1. We employed a structure-guided mutational analysis of the JAM-A dimer interface to identify determinants of reovirus binding. We purified mutant JAM-A ectodomains for solution-phase and surface plasmon resonance binding studies and expressed mutant forms of full-length JAM-A in Chinese hamster ovary cells to assess reovirus binding and infectivity. Mutation of residues in the JAM-A dimer interface that participate in salt-bridge or hydrogen-bond interactions with apposing JAM-A monomers abolishes the capacity of JAM-A to form dimers. JAM-A mutants incapable of dimer formation form complexes with the sigma1 head that are indistinguishable from wild-type JAM-A-sigma1 head complexes, indicating that sigma1 binds to JAM-A monomers. Residues Glu(61) and Lys(63) of beta-strand C and Leu(72) of beta-strand C' in the dimer interface are required for efficient JAM-A engagement of strain type 3 Dearing sigma1. Mutation of neighboring residues alters the kinetics of the sigma1-JAM-A binding interaction. Prototype reovirus strains type 1 Lang and type 2 Jones share similar, although not identical, binding requirements with type 3 Dearing. These results indicate that reovirus engages JAM-A monomers via residues found mainly on beta-strands C and C' of the dimer interface and raise the possibility that the distinct disease phenotypes produced in mice following infection with different strains of reovirus are in part attributable to differences in contacts with JAM-A.     

Utilization of sialic acid as a coreceptor enhances reovirus attachment by multistep adhesion strengthening

Many serotype 3 reoviruses bind to two different host cell molecules, sialic acid and an unidentified protein, using discrete receptor-binding domains in viral attachment protein, final sigma1. To determine mechanisms by which these receptor-binding events cooperate to mediate cell attachment, we generated isogenic reovirus strains that differ in the capacity to bind sialic acid. Strain SA+, but not SA-, bound specifically to sialic acid on a biosensor chip with nanomolar avidity. SA+ displayed 5-fold higher avidity for HeLa cells when compared with SA-, although both strains recognized the same proteinaceous receptor. Increased avidity of SA+ binding was mediated by increased k(on). Neuraminidase treatment to remove cell-surface sialic acid decreased the k(on) of SA+ to that of SA-. Increased k(on) of SA+ enhanced an infectious attachment process, since SA+ was 50-100-fold more efficient than SA- at infecting HeLa cells in a kinetic fluorescent focus assay. Sialic acid binding was operant early during SA+ attachment, since the capacity of soluble sialyllactose to inhibit infection decreased rapidly during the first 20 min of adsorption. These results indicate that reovirus binding to sialic acid enhances virus infection through adhesion of virus to the cell surface where access to a proteinaceous receptor is thermodynamically favored.     

JAM-A-independent, antibody-mediated uptake of reovirus into cells leads to apoptosis

Apoptosis plays a major role in the cytopathic effect induced by reovirus following infection of cultured cells and newborn mice. Strain-specific differences in the capacity of reovirus to induce apoptosis segregate with the S1 and M2 gene segments, which encode attachment protein σ1 and membrane penetration protein μ1, respectively. Virus strains that bind to both junctional adhesion molecule-A (JAM-A) and sialic acid are the most potent inducers of apoptosis. In addition to receptor binding, events in reovirus replication that occur during or after viral disassembly but prior to initiation of viral RNA synthesis also are required for reovirus-induced apoptosis. To determine whether reovirus infection initiated in the absence of JAM-A and sialic acid results in apoptosis, Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells engineered to express Fc receptors were infected with reovirus using antibodies directed against viral outer-capsid proteins. Fc-mediated infection of CHO cells induced apoptosis in a σ1-independent manner. Apoptosis following this uptake mechanism requires acid-dependent proteolytic disassembly, since treatment of cells with the weak base ammonium chloride diminished the apoptotic response. Analysis of T1L × T3D reassortant viruses revealed that the μ1-encoding M2 gene segment is the only viral determinant of the apoptosis-inducing capacity of reovirus when infection is initiated via Fc receptors. Additionally, a temperature-sensitive, membrane penetration-defective M2 mutant, tsA279.64, is an inefficient inducer of apoptosis. These data suggest that signaling pathways activated by binding of σ1 to JAM-A and sialic acid are dispensable for reovirus-mediated apoptosis and that the μ1 protein plays an essential role in stimulating proapoptotic signaling.     

Effect of neuraminidase treatment of cells and effect of soluble glycoproteins on type 3 reovirus attachment to murine L cells.

The effect of pretreatment of murine L cells with bacterial neuraminidases on type 3 reovirus attachment was examined. We observed that such treatments resulted in a 60 to 80% decrease of subsequent attachment of 35S-labeled type 3 reovirus in a time- and dose-dependent manner. This result was specific for removal of cell surface sialic acid residues since the specific neuraminidase inhibitor 2-deoxy-2,3-dehydro-n-acetyl neuraminic acid completely prevented the observed effect. Although the total amount of radiolabeled virus bound to neuraminidase-treated cells was greatly reduced, unlabeled reovirus competed only slightly less efficiently for the attachment of 35S-labeled reovirus to neuraminidase-treated versus mock-treated L cells, suggesting that the specificity of the virus interaction with cellular receptor sites was only slightly diminished. Saturation experiments with mock-treated cells or with cells treated with Vibrio cholerae or with V. cholerae plus Arthrobacter ureafaciens neuraminidases indicated that the number of specific cellular receptor sites for type 3 reovirus were reduced by about 47%. We determined that under the neuraminidase digestion conditions used in this experiment we were able to remove a maximum 75% of the total N-acetylneuraminic acid of L cells. Our results also demonstrated that glycoproteins bearing a large amount of sialic acid containing oligosaccharides as well as purified N-acetylneuraminic acid, N-glycolylneuraminic acid, and N-acetylneuraminyl lactose were inhibitors of attachment, while proteins containing no sialic acid or negligible amounts of sialic acid did not inhibit attachment. High concentrations of various monosaccharides and lactose had no effect on reovirus attachment, in agreement with the recent results of Armstrong and his collaborators (Armstrong et al., Virology, 138:37-48, 1984). These data are also supported by the observation that gangliosides are inhibitors of viral attachment (Armstrong et al., Virology, 138:37-48, 1984). Taken together, our results suggest that cell surface sialic acid-containing glycoconjugates are involved in type 3 reovirus binding to murine L cells.     

A comparative molecular force spectroscopy study of homophilic JAM-A interactions and JAM-A interactions with reovirus attachment protein sigma1

JAM-A belongs to a family of immunoglobulin-like proteins called junctional adhesion molecules (JAMs) that localize at epithelial and endothelial intercellular tight junctions. JAM-A is also expressed on dendritic cells, neutrophils, and platelets. Homophilic JAM-A interactions play an important role in regulating paracellular permeability and leukocyte transmigration across epithelial monolayers and endothelial cell junctions, respectively. In addition, JAM-A is a receptor for the reovirus attachment protein, sigma1. In this study, we used single molecular force spectroscopy to compare the kinetics of JAM-A interactions with itself and sigma1. A chimeric murine JAM-A/Fc fusion protein and the purified sigma1 head domain were used to probe murine L929 cells, which express JAM-A and are susceptible to reovirus infection. The bond half-life (t(1/2)) of homophilic JAM-A interactions was found to be shorter (k(off)(o) = 0.688 +/- 0.349 s(-1)) than that of sigma1/JAM-A interactions (k(off)(o) = 0.067 +/- 0.041 s(-1)). These results are in accordance with the physiological functions of JAM-A and sigma1. A short bond lifetime imparts a highly dynamic nature to homophilic JAM-A interactions for regulating tight junction permeability while stable interactions between sigma1 and JAM-A likely anchor the virus to the cell surface and facilitate viral entry.     

Anti-idiotypic antibody identifies the cellular receptor of reovirus type 3

The binding and subsequent infectivity of reovirus to target cells are mediated by interaction with specific cell surface viral receptors. To gain a more detailed understanding of the biochemistry of the reovirus receptor and the cellular consequences of viral attachment, we have studied the binding of type 3 reovirus (Dearing strain) in a quantitative manner utilizing an antiidiotypic antibody probe. A syngeneic monoclonal antiidiotypic antibody (87.92.6) was prepared by immunization with hybridoma cells which secrete an antireovirus hemagglutinin-specific antibody. This antiidiotypic antibody was previously shown to specifically recognize the cell surface receptor for reovirus type 3. In this report, we demonstrate that antiidiotype mimicked reovirus tropism in binding to murine thymomas; antiidiotype inhibited the binding of reovirus to specific targets, but not the binding of anti-H-2; and cross linking of receptor-bound antiidiotype by antiimmunoglobulin induced patching, but not capping of reovirus receptors. Utilizing radiolabeled antiidiotype, we next quantitate the number of reovirus receptors on R1.1 and YAC thymoma cells and, finally, report on the preliminary identification of the reovirus receptor as a 67,000-Da membrane glycoprotein.     

Contact residues and predicted structure of the reovirus type 3-receptor interaction.

Sequence similarity between the reovirus type 3 hemagglutinin (HA3) and a anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibody (87.92.6) has been shown to define the site of interaction with a neutralizing (idiotypic) monoclonal antibody (9B.G5) and the cellular receptor for the virus. A synthetic peptide (VL peptide) derived from the anti-idiotypic sequence inhibits viral binding to the receptor. In this study, variants of the VL peptide were utilized to probe specific amino acid residues involved in binding the neutralizing antibody and the receptor. These studies indicate that the--OH groups of several residues are involved in contacting the reovirus type 3 receptor, including Tyr49, Ser50, Ser52, and Thr53 in the anti-idiotypic sequence, corresponding to Tyr326, Ser327, Ser329, and Ser325 in HA3, respectively. In contrast, only Ser50 of the anti-idiotypic sequence, corresponding to Ser327 of HA3, significantly altered neutralizing antibody binding. Additional studies implicate sialic acid as a potential reovirus type 3 receptor on some cells. This includes inhibition of binding of reovirus type 3 and 87.92.6 to L cells by heavily sialylated glycoproteins. Sialic acid was therefore utilized as a candidate receptor to analyze potential interaction schemes with HA3/87.92.6. Sequence similarity to other immunoglobulin structures with similar sequences allowed modeling of the three-dimensional structure of these epitopes. These structures, in combination with peptide studies, allow the development of a model of the interaction of these epitopes with sialic acid, which serves as a reovirus type 3 receptor. These models reveal that similar amino acid residues and side-chain geometries may be utilized by the reovirus type 3 and influenza hemagglutinins in their interactions with cell-surface receptors.     

Interaction of reovirus with cell surface receptors. II. Generation of suppressor T cells by the hemagglutinin of reovirus type 3

In studying reovirus interactions with lymphocytes, we have found that reovirus type 3, but not type 1, inhibits the in vitro proliferative response of murine splenic lymphocytes to concanavalin A (Con A). By analyzing recombinant clones containing genes from both reovirus types 1 and 3, we found that the S1 gene, the gene that encodes the viral hemagglutinin, is responsible for the inhibitory effect. In addition we found that type 3, but not type 1, generates suppressor T cells in vitro capable of suppressing Con A proliferation. By analyzing recombinant clones, we also found that the viral hemagglutinin is responsible for the generation of suppressor T cells by reovirus type 3. These effects were observed whether UV-inactivated or live virus was used. Reovirus type 3 inhibition of the proliferative response of murine splenic lymphocytes to Con A was blocked by anti-reovirus type 3 antibody but not by anti-reovirus type 1 antibody. Antiviral antibody had no effect on the ability of reovirus type 3 induced suppressor cells to inhibit Con A proliferation. We have previously demonstrated a receptor on murine lymphocytes for the hemagglutinin of reovirus type 3, and our results suggest that the in vitro suppression of Con A proliferation of murine lymphocytes by reovirus type 3 is secondary to the interaction of the viral hemagglutinin with a receptor on the surface of murine lymphocytes, which results in the generation of functionally active suppressor T cells.     

Crystal structure of reovirus attachment protein sigma1 reveals evolutionary relationship to adenovirus fiber.

Reovirus attaches to cellular receptors with the sigma1 protein, a fiber-like molecule protruding from the 12 vertices of the icosahedral virion. The crystal structure of a receptor-binding fragment of sigma1 reveals an elongated trimer with two domains: a compact head with a new beta-barrel fold and a fibrous tail containing a triple beta-spiral. Numerous structural and functional similarities between reovirus sigma1 and the adenovirus fiber suggest an evolutionary link in the receptor-binding strategies of these two viruses. A prominent loop in the sigma1 head contains a cluster of residues that are conserved among reovirus serotypes and are likely to form a binding site for junction adhesion molecule, an integral tight junction protein that serves as a reovirus receptor. The fibrous tail is mainly responsible for sigma1 trimer formation, and it contains a highly flexible region that allows for significant movement between the base of the tail and the head. The architecture of the trimer interface and the observed flexibility indicate that sigma1 is a metastable structure poised to undergo conformational changes upon viral attachment and cell entry.     

Comparative sequence analysis of the reovirus S4 genes from 13 serotype 1 and serotype 3 field isolates.

The reovirus sigma 3 protein is a major outer capsid protein that may function to regulate translation within infected cells. To facilitate the understanding of sigma 3 structure and functions and the evolution of mammalian reoviruses, we sequenced cDNA copies of the S4 genes from 10 serotype 3 and 3 serotype 1 reovirus field isolates and compared these sequences with sequences of prototypic strains of the three reovirus serotypes. We found that the sigma 3 proteins are highly conserved: the two longest conserved regions contain motifs proposed to function in binding zinc and double-stranded RNA. We used the 16 viral isolates to investigate the hypothesis that structural interactions between sigma 3 and the cell attachment protein, sigma 1, constrain their evolution and to identify a determinant within sigma 3 that is in close proximity to the sigma 1 hemagglutination site.     

Structure of Reovirus σ1 in Complex with Its Receptor Junctional Adhesion Molecule-A

Viral attachment to specific host receptors is the first step in viral infection and serves an essential function in the selection of target cells. Mammalian reoviruses are highly useful experimental models for studies of viral pathogenesis and show promise as vectors for oncolytics and vaccines. Reoviruses engage cells by binding to carbohydrates and the immunoglobulin superfamily member, junctional adhesion molecule-A (JAM-A). JAM-A exists at the cell surface as a homodimer formed by extensive contacts between its N-terminal immunoglobulin-like domains. We report the crystal structure of reovirus attachment protein σ1 in complex with a soluble form of JAM-A. The σ1 protein disrupts the JAM-A dimer, engaging a single JAM-A molecule via virtually the same interface that is used for JAM-A homodimerization. Thus, reovirus takes advantage of the adhesive nature of an immunoglobulin-superfamily receptor by usurping the ligand-binding site of this molecule to attach to the cell surface. The dissociation constant (K_D) of the interaction between σ1 and JAM-A is 1,000-fold lower than that of the homophilic interaction between JAM-A molecules, indicating that JAM-A strongly prefers σ1 as a ligand. Analysis of reovirus mutants engineered by plasmid-based reverse genetics revealed residues in σ1 required for binding to JAM-A and infectivity of cultured cells. These studies define biophysical mechanisms of reovirus cell attachment and provide a platform for manipulating reovirus tropism to enhance vector targeting.     

Direct induction of Ia antigen on murine thyroid-derived epithelial cells by reovirus

The ability of thyroid follicular epithelial cells (TFEC) to act as APC is linked to the expression of class II (Ia) molecules of the MHC. The cloned murine thyroid-derived epithelial cell line M.5 was used to demonstrate the potential effects of virus in the direct induction of Ia molecules on TFEC. Membrane binding and replication of reovirus type 1 in TFEC was demonstrated using fluorescein-labeled antireovirus antibody and fluorescence microscopy. One consequence of the interaction between reovirus and M.5 cells was the induction of Ia Ag and augmented class I molecule expression in M.5 cells. The levels of Ia expression at three days after reovirus binding were amplified 17.3-fold over controls and were 2-fold less than that seen upon treatment of M.5 cells with IFN-gamma. Supernatant transfer experiments showed that the induction of Ia expression was directly linked to the binding of virus to M.5 cells, and was not dependent upon virus replication or the presence of IFN. These results indicate that early events of reovirus binding or receptor internalization on TFEC initiate a signaling process which results in the induction of class II and augmentation of class I MHC protein levels on the cell surface.     

High affinity binding of reovirus type 3 to cells that lack beta adrenergic receptor activity

A previous report demonstrated both immunological crossreactivity and structural similarity between the mammalian beta adrenergic receptor and the cell surface receptor for the reovirus type 3 (14). We now demonstrate that reovirus type 3 can bind selectively and with high affinity to cells that lack beta adrenergic receptor activity (L-cells). The present study was also designed to determine what effect reovirus binding has on beta adrenergic receptor function in cells (DDT1) that possess an intact ligand binding site. Based on computer analysis of reovirus competitive inhibition curves, the apparent dissociation binding constants (Kd) for reovirus binding to DDT1 and L-cells are 0.1 nM and 0.25 nM, respectively. High affinity [125I]-iodocyanopindolol (CYP) binding to beta adrenergic receptors can also be demonstrated in DDT1 cells but not in L-cells. In agreement with these ligand binding studies, adenylate cyclase activity is stimulated by the beta receptor agonist isoproterenol in DDT1 cell membranes but not in L-cell membranes. In addition, isoproterenol increases cAMP levels in DDT1 cells but not in L-cells. Neither reovirus serotype stimulates cAMP levels in either cell line, nor do they influence beta-adrenergic agonist stimulation of cAMP in DDT1 cells. These results argue against identity of the receptors for reovirus type 3 and beta adrenergic ligands.