Ⅱ型肺泡细胞特异表达SARS冠状病毒核衣壳蛋白转基因小鼠的建立

目的:建立Ⅱ型肺泡细胞特异表达SARS冠状病毒(SARS-CoV)核衣壳蛋白(N蛋白)的转基因小鼠。方法:用分子克隆的方法构建包括肺表面活性蛋白A(SP-A)启动子、SARS-CoVN蛋白基因、β-半乳糖苷酶(LacZ)报告基因和人生长激素(hGH)polyA的转基因载体pSP-A-N。以显微注射的方法将8.3kb的转基因片段引入小鼠受精卵。通过PCR、Southern印迹和LacZ染色检测子代小鼠中转基因的整合及表达。结果:共注射952枚受精卵,移植至42只假孕母小鼠的输卵管中发育,获得子代小鼠128只,经PCR、Southern印迹鉴定,其中11只小鼠基因组上整合有SARS-CoVN蛋白基因,整合率为8.6%。鉴定结果显示,11只转基因首建者小鼠中有1只表达外源基因并能正常传代。LacZ染色结果表明N蛋白基因在转基因小鼠Ⅱ型肺上皮细胞中特异表达。结论:成功构建了Ⅱ型肺泡细胞特异表达SARS-CoVN蛋白的转基因小鼠,为深入研究该基因的病理生理学效应奠定了基础。     

成骨细胞特异性表达Cre重组酶转基因小鼠的建立

构建了含有骨钙素基因启动子、Cre重组酶基因和人生长激素基因polyA的转基因载体pOC-Cre, 以显微注射的方法将4.6 kb的转基因片段OC-Cre导入小鼠受精卵。16只子代小鼠中经PCR和Southern杂交鉴定, 有2只小鼠携带外源基因, 整合率为12.5%。为了检测OC-Cre在转基因小鼠中表达的组织特异性, 将转基因首建者小鼠与基因组上携带有LoxP位点的条件性Smad4基因敲除小鼠交配, PCR结果显示, 仅在子代纯合型小鼠骨组织基因组中扩增出了Cre介导重组后的片段。将OC-Cre转基因小鼠与ROSA26报告小鼠交配, 利用LacZ染色对双转基因阳性子代小鼠进行检测, 结果显示Cre重组酶在成骨细胞中特异性表达并介导ROSA基因座LoxP位点间的重组。所有这些结果说明：所建立的OC-Cre转基因小鼠在成骨细胞中特异性表达Cre重组酶, 并能在体内介导成骨细胞基因组上LoxP位点间的重组, 是一种理想的研制成骨细胞特异性基因敲除小鼠的工具小鼠。     

血管内皮细胞特异表达Cre重组酶转基因小鼠的建立

血管内皮细胞参与血管形成、血管稳态维持、血栓形成、炎症和血管重建等生理和病理过程。为了便于通过Cre-LoxP系统研究相关基因在血管内皮细胞中的功能,创建了Tie2-Cre转基因小鼠,利用Tie2基因的启动子驱动Cre重组酶基因在血管内皮细胞中表达。经基因组PCR和Southern Blot鉴定有6只小鼠在基因组上整合有Cre基因,整合率为11％。为了验证Cre重组酶的剪切活性和表达组织分布,我们将Tie2-Cre转基因小鼠分别与Smad4条件基因打靶小鼠和报告小鼠ROSA26交配。Tie2-Cre;Smad4^co/＋小鼠的多个组织的基因组DNA的PCR结果显示,Cre重组酶在所有包含血管内皮细胞的组织中表达并能介导LoxP间的重组。Tie2-Cre;ROSA26双转基因胚胎LacZ染色结果显示,Cre重组酶在所有被检测组织的血管内皮细胞中特异性表达。因此．Tie2-Cre转基因小鼠可作血管内皮细胞谱系分析和在血管内皮细胞进行条件基因打靶的理想工具小鼠。     

组织特异RNAi转基因小鼠模型的构建

RNAi是一种行之有效的基因沉默的新方法,被广泛地应用于基因功能的研究、疾病的治疗以及新型疫苗的研制等领域.本研究通过原核显微注射干扰载体的方法制备转基因小鼠.选用皮肤组织特异表达的人源角蛋白14（K14）基因启动子（2000bp）作为表达载体启动子,成功地驱动融合表达载体EGFP-shRNA进行干扰片段前体的转录,进而生成成熟的干扰片段,靶向小鼠BMP4基因使其发生沉默.所得到的转基因小鼠及其杂交后代经PCR和Southern杂交鉴定,结果表明外源基因准确无误地整合到小鼠基因组.Northern杂交结果证明,小干扰RNA在皮肤组织中有较高水平的表达,在肺和肠组织中有较低水平的表达.研究结果表明,利用PolⅡ型（K14）启动子驱动shRNA融合转录本的表达,在特定组织高表达siRNA,从而达到抑制特定组织目的基因表达的技术路线是可行的.同时为利用K14启动子进行毛囊相关基因干扰研究积累了基础数据,为制备组织特异抑制基因表达的转基因大家畜提供了一个参考方法.     

增强子驱动的Cre转基因小鼠的构建及Cre基因的表达鉴定

目的:探索将增强子应用于构建Cre转基因小鼠品系,为以条件基因敲除为基础的基因功能研究提供更多的工具。方法:通过PCR方法从小鼠的细菌人工染色体扩增UH增强子片段,构建含有Hsp68基础启动子、增强子UH、Cre重组酶基因和SV40 polyA的转基因载体pLW400,将3.3 kb的转基因片段通过显微注射导入小鼠受精卵;为了检测Cre在转基因小鼠中的表达,将转基因一代小鼠与纯合子ROSA26报告小鼠(R/R)交配,收集第14 d胚胎期(E14)的舌组织进行LacZ染色检测鉴定。结果:经鉴定,31只子代小鼠中有6只携带外源基因,整合率为19.4%;与R/+对照相比,E14期的双基因型Cre,R/+舌组织为阳性结果(蓝色)。这表明Cre基因在转基因小鼠舌组织内得到表达,并在体内介导ROSA26基因座loxP位点间的重组,且有效删除了2个loxP之间的片段,从而启动了LacZ基因的表达。结论:构建了UH增强子-Hsp68Cre的转基因小鼠,在舌肌中特异表达Cre基因,提示增强子可以被选择应用于Cre转基因小鼠的构建;为舌肌的发育和再生研究奠定了基础。     

胰腺组织表达Cre重组酶转基因小鼠的建立及鉴定

组织特异性表达Cre重组酶的转基因小鼠是进行组织特异性基因剔除研究的重要工具。为了建立胰腺组织特异性Cre转基因小鼠,我们通过PCR克隆了大鼠胰岛素基因启动子,并用它指导Cre基因在胰岛细胞中的特异性表达。在Cre重组酶基因5′端添加了真核核糖体结合序列和核定位序列以使Cre重组酶能穿越核膜在细胞核中发挥功能;同时,在Cre基因3′端添加了含内含子的3′端人生长激素基因。表达载体经显微注射导入小鼠受精卵以建立转基因小鼠。PCR检测显示共获得7只Cre整合阳性的转基因首建者小鼠;RTPCR结果表明其中1只首建者小鼠的子代鼠在胰腺中转录了外源基因,进一步的Southern杂交结果表明,该转基因小鼠能够在胰腺中表达有功能的Cre重组酶。      

中枢神经系统特异性表达Cre重组酶的转基因小鼠

利用从129sv小鼠基因组文库克隆得到的1．8kb的胶质细胞原纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)基因的5′端调控序列,构建了含有2个β—珠蛋白绝缘子、GFAP5′端调控区、Cre基因和人生长激素基因(hGH)polyA的转基因载体pGFAP—Cre—hGH。以显微注射的方法将7．6kb的转基因片段pGFAP—Cre—hGH引入191枚小鼠基因组受精卵,其中176枚分别移植至8只假孕母鼠的输卵管中使其发育,共获得子代小鼠25只。经PCR和Southern杂交鉴定其中7只小鼠基因组上整合有Cre基因,整合率为28％。用整合有Cre基因的转基因小鼠与基因组上整合有LoxP位点和LacZ表达框的ROSA26鼠杂交,以检测Cre酶的活性、组织特异性及其介导的两个LoxP位点间的重组。LacZ染色结果表明,GFAP—Cre转基因小鼠只在中枢神经系统中表达Cre重组酶并能在体内成功介导LoxP位点间的重组。     

肝组织特异表达人核受体nr5a2转基因小鼠的构建

人乙肝病毒增强子ⅡB1结合因子（hB1F）系Ftz—F1（NR5A）亚家族的新成员。经基因重组法将人hb1 fcDNA置于小鼠白蛋白增慢子／启动子序列下游构建成肝特异重组载体,通过原核显微注射将该载体导入小鼠受精卵原核,经注射且状态良好的卯回输至假孕母鼠输卯管。产下仔鼠经PCR和Southern blotting鉴定,同时RT—PCR和Western blotting分析转基因的表达。阳性Founder鼠与正常C57鼠交配以建立转基因纯系小鼠,F1代以PCR法鉴定。结果共获得4只PCR鉴定转基因阳性Founder鼠,其中一只同时经Southern blotting鉴定为阳性。RT—PCR和Western blotting结果显示,外源基因在转基因小鼠的肝组织成功表达。遗传学分析表明,转基因已整合入小鼠基因组并可稳定溃传。     

EGFP-LacZ双报告基因真核表达载体的构建及体外表达

构建(β-半乳糖苷酶与增强型绿色荧光蛋白(EGFP)双报告基因的真核表达载体,并在真核细胞中表达。采用PCR方法从质粒pLenti6/V5-GW/LacZ 中获取LacZ全基因,与pEGFP-C1重组后构建真核表达载体pEGFP-C1-LacZ。该重组质粒经PCR和酶切方法鉴定后,在脂质体介导下转染293FT细胞株及鸡胚成纤维细胞,通过荧光观察和组织化学方法检测Egfp和LacZ基因的表达。结果表明,LacZ基因被克隆到pEGFP-C1,成功构建了双报告基因真核表达载体。该重组质粒转染后的细胞呈现绿色荧光,组织化学方法检测到呈蓝色的细胞,表明两个报告基因均能在细胞内正确表达。     

人α-半乳糖苷酶转导克服异种移植HAR的小鼠实验研究

α 半乳糖苷酶可以特异地清除半乳糖α 1,3 半乳糖抗原 (Galα1,3Galantigen) ,此抗原是引起异种器官移植超急性排斥反应 (HyperacuteRejection ,HAR)的主要异种抗原 .将构建好的α半乳糖苷酶转基因载体通过显微注射的方式注入小鼠受精卵 ,培育出了转基因小鼠 .结果表明 ,转基因小鼠的心、肝、肾、脾、肺组织中均有人α 半乳糖苷酶基因的表达 ,其表达可以有效减少小鼠器官表面Galα1,3Gal抗原的表达水平 ,可以降低转基因小鼠脾细胞对补体介导的杀伤作用的敏感性 .研究表明人源α半乳糖苷酶基因可用于研制不表达Galα1,3Gal抗原的转基因动物 ,从而可以降低异种器官移植HAR的反应强度 ,提高移植物的存活期     

On the origin of the Hirudinea and the demise of the Oligochaeta

The phylogenetic relationships of the Clitellata were investigated with a data set of published and new complete 18S rRNA gene sequences of 51 species representing 41 families. Sequences were aligned on the basis of a secondary structure model and analysed with maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. In contrast to the latter method, parsimony did not recover the monophyly of Clitellata. However, a close scrutiny of the data suggested a spurious attraction between some polychaetes and clitellates. As a rule, molecular trees are closely aligned with morphology-based phylogenies. Acanthobdellida and Euhirudinea were reconciled in their traditional Hirudinea clade and were included in the Oligochaeta with the Branchiobdellida via the Lumbriculidae as a possible link between the two assemblages. While the 18S gene yielded a meaningful historical signal for determining relationships within clitellates, the exact position of Hirudinea and Branchiobdellida within oligochaetes remained unresolved. The lack of phylogenetic signal is interpreted as evidence for a rapid radiation of these taxa. The placement of Clitellata within the Polychaeta remained unresolved. The biological reality of polytomies within annelids is suggested and supports the hypothesis of an extremely ancient radiation of polychaetes and emergence of clitellates.     

On the ontogeny of the haptor and the evolution of the Monogenea

Data on the ontogeny of the posterior haptor of monogeneans were obtained from more than 150 publications and summarised. These data were plotted into diagrams showing evolutionary capacity levels based on the theory of a progressive evolution of marginal hooks, anchors and other attachment components of the posterior haptor in the Monogenea (Malmberg, 1986). 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks are assumed to be the most primitive monogenean haptoral condition. Thus the diagrams were founded on a 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hook evolutionary capacity level, and the evolutionary capacity levels of anchors and other haptoral attachement components were arranged according to haptoral ontogenetical sequences. In the final plotting diagram data on hosts, type of spermatozoa, oncomiracidial ciliation, sensilla pattern and protonephridial systems were also included. In this way a number of correlations were revealed. Thus, for example, the number of 5 + 5 marginal hooks correlates with the most primitive monogenean type of spermatozoon and with few sensillae, many ciliated cells and a simple protonephridial system in the oncomiracidium. On the basis of the reviewed data it is concluded that the ancient monogeneans with 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks were divided into two main lines, one retaining unhinged marginal hooks and the other evolving hinged marginal hooks. Both main lines have recent representatives at different marginal hook evolutionary capacity levels, i.e. monogeneans retaining a haptor with only marginal hooks. For the main line with hinged marginal hooks the name Articulon-choinea n. subclass is proposed. Members with 8 + 8 hinged marginal hooks only are here called Proanchorea n. superord. Monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks only are here called Ananchorea n. superord. and three new families are erected for its recent members: Anonchohapteridae n. fam., Acolpentronidae n. fam. and Anacanthoridae n. fam. (with 7 + 7, 8 + 8 and 9 + 9 unhinged marginal hooks, respectively). Except for the families of Articulonchoinea (e.g. Acanthocotylidae, Gyrodactylidae, Tetraonchoididae) Bychowsky's (1957) division of the Monogenea into the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea fits the proposed scheme, i.e. monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks form one old group, the Oligonchoinea, which have 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks, and the other group form the Polyonchoinea, which (with the exception of the Hexabothriidae) has a greater number (7 + 7, 8 + 8 or 9 + 9) of unhinged marginal hooks. It is proposed that both these names, Oligonchoinea (sensu mihi) and Polyonchoinea (sensu mihi), will be retained on one side and Articulonchoinea placed on the other side, which reflects the early monogenean evolution. Except for the members of Ananchorea [Polyonchoinea], all members of the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea have anchors, which imply that they are further evolved, i.e. have passed the 5 + 5 marginal hook evolutionary capacity level (Malmberg, 1986). There are two main types of anchors in the Monogenea: haptoral anchors, with anlages appearing in the haptor, and peduncular anchors, with anlages in the peduncle. There are two types of haptoral anchors: peripheral haptoral anchors, ontogenetically the oldest, and central haptoral anchors. Peduncular anchors, in turn, are ontogenetically younger than peripheral haptoral anchors. There may be two pairs of peduncular anchors: medial peduncular anchors, ontogentically the oldest, and lateral peduncular anchors. Only peduncular (not haptoral) anchors have anchor bars. Monogeneans with haptoral anchors are here called Mediohaptanchorea n. superord. and Laterohaptanchorea n. superord. or haptanchoreans. All oligonchoineans and the oldest polyonchoineans are haptanchoreans. Certain members of Calceostomatidae [Polyonchoinea] are the only monogeneans with both (peripheral) haptoral and peduncular anchors (one pair). These monogeneans are here called Mixanchorea n. superord. Polyonchoineans with peduncular anchors and unhinged marginal hooks are here called the Pedunculanchorea n. superord. The most primitive pedunculanchoreans have only one pair of peduncular anchors with an anchor bar, while the most advanced have both medial and lateral peduncular anchors; each pair having an anchor bar. Certain families of the Articulonchoinea, the Anchorea n. superord., also have peduncular anchors (parallel evolution): only one family, the Sundanonchidae n. fam., has both medial and lateral peduncular anchors, each anchor pair with an anchor bar. Evolutionary lines from different monogenean evolutionary capacity levels are discussed and a new system of classification for the Monogenea is proposed.In agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. EditorIn agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. Editor