Metabolomic linkage reveals functional interaction between glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and ghrelin in humans

The gastric peptide ghrelin promotes energy storage, appetite, and food intake. Nutrient intake strongly suppresses circulating ghrelin via molecular mechanisms possibly involving insulin and gastrointestinal hormones. On the basis of the growing evidence that glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is involved in the control of fuel metabolism, we hypothesized that GIP and/or insulin, directly or via changes in plasma metabolites, might affect circulating ghrelin. Fourteen obese subjects were infused with GIP (2.0 pmol·kg(-1)·min(-1)) or placebo in the fasting state during either euglycemic hyperinsulinemic (EC) or hyperglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamps (HC). Apart from analysis of plasma ghrelin and insulin levels, GC-TOF/MS analysis was applied to create a hormone-metabolite network for each experiment. The GIP and insulin effects on circulating ghrelin were analyzed within the framework of those networks. In the HC, ghrelin levels decreased in the absence (19.2% vs. baseline, P = 0.028) as well as in the presence of GIP (33.8%, P = 0.018). Ghrelin levels were significantly lower during HC with GIP than with placebo, despite insulin levels not differing significantly. In the GIP network combining data on GIP-infusion, EC+GIP and HC+GIP experiments, ghrelin was integrated into hormone-metabolite networks through a connection to a group of long-chain fatty acids. In contrast, ghrelin was excluded from the network of experiments without GIP. GIP decreased circulating ghrelin and might have affected the ghrelin system via modification of long-chain fatty acid pools. These observations were independent of insulin and offer potential mechanistic underpinnings for the involvement of GIP in systemic control of energy metabolism.     

The influence of insulin on circulating ghrelin

Ghrelin is a novel peptide that acts on the growth hormone (GH) secretagogue receptor in the pituitary and hypothalamus. It may function as a third physiological regulator of GH secretion, along with GH-releasing hormone and somatostatin. In addition to the action of ghrelin on the GH axis, it appears to have a role in the determination of energy homeostasis. Although feeding suppresses ghrelin production and fasting stimulates ghrelin release, the underlying mechanisms controlling this process remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to test the hypotheses, by use of a stepped hyperinsulinemic eu- hypo- hyperglycemic glucose clamp, that either hyperinsulinemia or hypoglycemia may influence ghrelin production. Having been stable in the period before the clamp, ghrelin levels rapidly fell in response to insulin infusion during euglycemia (baseline ghrelin 207 +/- 12 vs. 169 +/- 10 fmol/ml at t = 30 min, P < 0.001). Ghrelin remained suppressed during subsequent periods of hypoglycemia (mean glucose 53 +/- 2 mg/dl) and hyperglycemia (mean glucose 163 +/- 6 mg/dl). Despite suppression of ghrelin, GH showed a significant rise during hypoglycemia (baseline 4.1 +/- 1.3 vs. 28.2 +/- 3.9 microg/l at t = 120 min, P < 0.001). Our data suggest that insulin may suppress circulating ghrelin independently of glucose, although glucose may have an additional effect. We conclude that the GH response seen during hypoglycemia is not regulated by circulating ghrelin.     

Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) suppresses ghrelin levels in humans via increased insulin secretion

INTRODUCTION: Ghrelin is an orexigenic peptide predominantly secreted by the stomach. Ghrelin plasma levels rise before meal ingestion and sharply decline afterwards, but the mechanisms controlling ghrelin secretion are largely unknown. Since meal ingestion also elicits the secretion of the incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), we examined whether exogenous GLP-1 administration reduces ghrelin secretion in humans. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 14 healthy male volunteers were given intravenous infusions of GLP-1(1.2 pmol x kg(-1) min(-1)) or placebo over 390 min. After 30 min, a solid test meal was served. Venous blood was drawn frequently for the determination of glucose, insulin, C-peptide, GLP-1 and ghrelin. RESULTS: During the infusion of exogenous GLP-1 and placebo, GLP-1 plasma concentrations reached steady-state levels of 139+/-15 pmol/l and 12+/-2 pmol/l, respectively (p<0.0001). During placebo infusion, ghrelin levels were significantly reduced in the immediate postprandial period (p<0.001), and rose again afterwards. GLP-1 administration prevented the initial postprandial decline in ghrelin levels, possibly as a result of delayed gastric emptying, and significantly reduced ghrelin levels 150 and 360 min after meal ingestion (p<0.05). The patterns of ghrelin concentrations in the experiments with GLP-1 and placebo administration were inversely related to the respective plasma levels of insulin and C-peptide. CONCLUSIONS: GLP-1 reduces the rise in ghrelin levels in the late postprandial period at supraphysiological plasma levels. Most likely, these effects are indirectly mediated through its insulinotropic action. The GLP-1-induced suppression of ghrelin secretion might be involved in its anorexic effects.     

The reduction in hepatic insulin clearance after oral glucose is not mediated by gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP)

Since the C-peptide/insulin ratio is reduced after oral glucose ingestion, the incretin hormone gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) has been assumed to decrease hepatic insulin extraction. It was the aim of the present study to evaluate the effects of GIP on insulin extraction. Seventy-eight healthy subjects (27 male, 51 female, 43+/-11 years) were subjected to (a). an oral glucose tolerance test and (b). an intravenous injection of 20 pmol GIP/kg body weight, with capillary and venous blood samples collected over 30 min for insulin, C-peptide and GIP (specific immunoassays). Following GIP administration, plasma concentrations of total and intact GIP reached to peak levels of 80+/-7 and 54+/-5 pmol/l, respectively (p<0.0001). The rise in insulin after oral glucose and after intravenous GIP administration significantly exceeded the rise in C-peptide (p<0.0001). Estimating insulin extraction from the total integrated insulin and C-peptide concentrations (AUCs), only the oral glucose load (p<0.0001), but not the intravenous GIP administration (p=0.18) significantly reduced insulin clearance. Therefore, insulin clearance is reduced after an oral glucose load. This effect does not appear to be mediated by GIP.     

Gastric inhibitory polypeptide does not inhibit gastric emptying in humans

The insulinotropic gut hormone gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) has been demonstrated to inhibit gastric acid secretion and was proposed to possess "enterogastrone" activity. GIP effects on gastric emptying have not yet been studied. Fifteen healthy male volunteers (23.9 +/- 3.3 yr, body mass index 23.7 +/- 2.3 kg/m(2)) were studied with the intravenous infusion of GIP (2 pmol.kg(-1).min(-1)) or placebo, each administered to the volunteers on separate occasions from -30 to 360 min in the fasting state. At 0 min, a solid test meal (250 kcal containing [(13)C]sodium octanoate) was served. Gastric emptying was calculated from the (13)CO(2) exhalation rates in breath samples collected over 360 min. Venous blood was drawn in 30-min intervals for the determination of glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and GIP (total and intact). Statistical calculations were made by use of repeated-measures ANOVA and one-way ANOVA. During the infusion, GIP rose to steady-state concentrations of 159 +/- 15 pmol/l for total and 34 +/- 4 pmol/l for intact GIP (P < 0.0001). Meal ingestion further increased GIP concentrations in both groups, reaching peak levels of 265 +/- 20 and 82 +/- 9 pmol/l for total and 67 +/- 7 and 31 +/- 9 pmol/l for intact GIP during the administration of GIP and placebo, respectively (P < 0.0001). There were no differences in glucose, insulin, and C-peptide between the experiments with the infusion of GIP or placebo. Gastric half-emptying times were 120 +/- 9 and 120 +/- 18 min (P = 1.0, with GIP and placebo, respectively). The time pattern of gastric emptying was similar in the two groups (P = 0.98). Endogenous GIP secretion, as derived from the incremental area under the curve of plasma GIP concentrations in the placebo experiments, did not correlate to gastric half-emptying times (r(2) = 0.15, P = 0.15 for intact GIP; r(2) = 0.21, P = 0.086 for total GIP). We conclude that gastric emptying does not appear to be influenced by GIP. The secretion of GIP after meal ingestion is not suppressed by its exogenous administration. The lack of effect of GIP on gastric emptying underlines the differences between GIP and the second incretin glucagon-like peptide 1.     

Acylated ghrelin secretion is acutely suppressed by oral glucose load or insulin-induced hypoglycemia independently of basal growth hormone secretion in humans

BACKGROUND: Ghrelin has been reported to be the natural ligand of growth hormone (GH) secretagogue receptor, and it is known that exogenous ghrelin administration strongly stimulates GH release in humans. However, the effects of endogenous ghrelin on GH secretion and changes in ghrelin levels during dynamic changes in GH levels are not well understood. METHODS: Therefore, we measured circulating acylated ghrelin concentrations during oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) in patients with active acromegaly (AA, n = 9) and in age/sex/BMI-matched group A controls (n = 12), and during insulin tolerance testing (ITT) in patients with GH deficiency (GHD, n = 10) and in group B controls (n = 10). Plasma acylated ghrelin, serum GH, insulin and glucose levels were measured during each test. RESULTS: Fasting plasma ghrelin levels correlated negatively with serum insulin levels in both group A and B controls (r = -0.665; p < 0.05) but not in patients with AA or GHD. During OGTTs, circulating ghrelin levels decreased significantly with a nadir at 30 min in both patients with AA (p < 0.05) and group A controls (p < 0.01). Also, ITTs were followed by a significant decrease in circulating ghrelin levels with a nadir at 30 min in patients with GHD (p < 0.05) and in group B controls (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The results of the study show that at baseline acylated ghrelin levels do not differ with respect to the GH status (GH excess or GH deficiency) and, furthermore, the suppression of acylated ghrelin levels during OGTT or ITT is independent of the GH response to the tests.     

Acute insulin infusion decreases plasma ghrelin levels in uncomplicated obesity

BACKGROUND: Plasma ghrelin levels have been shown to decrease after insulin infusion in lean subjects. Nevertheless, the mechanism of the suggested inhibitory effect of insulin on ghrelin is still unclear and no data about the effect of acute insulin infusion on plasma ghrelin concentration in obese subjects are available. OBJECTIVE: We sight to evaluate plasma ghrelin concentration during an hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp in uncomplicated obese subjects. METHODS: 35 uncomplicated obese subjects, body mass index (BMI) 43.3+/-10.1 kg/m(2), 33 women and 2 men, mean age 34.9+/-10, with a history of excess fat of at least 10 years underwent euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp. Blood samples for ghrelin were performed at baseline and steady state of euglycemic insulin clamp. RESULTS: Ghrelin concentrations decreased over time to 10.6+/-15% (range 2-39%) of baseline, from a mean of 205.53+/-93.79 pg/ml to 179.03+/-70.43 pg/ml during the clamp (95% CI, 10.69 to 36.44, P<0.01). In a univariate linear regression analysis baseline plasma ghrelin levels were inversely correlated to BMI (r=-0.564, P=0.04). A linear positive trend between whole body glucose utilization (M(FFMkg) index) and ghrelin reduction during the clamp was found (chi(2) 3.05, p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data seem to suggest that hyperinsulinemia during a euglycemic clamp is able to suppress plasma ghrelin concentrations in uncomplicated obesity. This effect appears to be positively related to insulin sensitivity.     

Constant intravenous ghrelin infusion in healthy young men: clinical pharmacokinetics and metabolic effects

Ghrelin levels fluctuate rapidly and dynamically with surges before meal times and postprandial troughs, and ghrelin increases appetite and food intake. Circulating ghrelin correlates negatively with body mass index (BMI), but obese individuals have a reduced postprandial decrease in ghrelin levels. Whether this reflects changes in secretion or clearance of ghrelin is uncertain. We therefore studied the pharmacokinetics of ghrelin in relation to anthropometric and biochemical measures. We also studied the effects of ghrelin on hormones and metabolites. In fasting humans, we used a constant infusion rate of ghrelin lasting 180 min at 5 pmol.kg body wt(-1).min(-1) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. Serum ghrelin (s-ghrelin; total levels) was distributed and eliminated according to a two-compartment model. s-Ghrelin initial half-life was 24 +/- 2 min and terminal half-life 146 +/- 36 min, respectively. Mean residence time (MRT) of ghrelin was 93 +/- 16 min. MRT correlated positively with both BMI (r = 0.51, P < 0.001) and high-density cholesterol (HDL) levels (r = 0.75, P < 0.001). Serum insulin levels remained constant during ghrelin infusion, whereas plasma glucose increased 0.3 +/- 0.1 mmol/l (P < 0.01) and free fatty acid levels more than doubled (to 1.03 +/- 0.08 mmol/l, P < 0.001), translating into a significant reduction of insulin sensitivity (P < 0.001). In conclusion, 1) we describe novel pharmacokinetics of ghrelin that are useful when tailoring ghrelin infusion rates in clinical experiments, 2) BMI and HDL correlate positively with MRT of infused ghrelin, and 3) supraphysiological ghrelin levels impair insulin sensitivity.     

Both GLP-1 and GIP are insulinotropic at basal and postprandial glucose levels and contribute nearly equally to the incretin effect of a meal in healthy subjects

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are both incretin hormones regulating postprandial insulin secretion. Their relative importance in this respect under normal physiological conditions is unclear, however, and the aim of the present investigation was to evaluate this. Eight healthy male volunteers (mean age: 23 (range 20-25) years; mean body mass index: 22.2 (range 19.3-25.4) kg/m2) participated in studies involving stepwise glucose clamping at fasting plasma glucose levels and at 6 and 7 mmol/l. Physiological amounts of either GIP (1.5 pmol/kg/min), GLP-1(7-36)amide (0.33 pmol/kg/min) or saline were infused for three periods of 30 min at each glucose level, with 1 h "washout" between the infusions. On a separate day, a standard meal test (566 kcal) was performed. During the meal test, peak insulin concentrations were observed after 30 min and amounted to 223+/-27 pmol/l. Glucose+saline infusions induced only minor increases in insulin concentrations. GLP-1 and GIP infusions induced significant and similar increases at fasting glucose levels and at 6 mmol/l. At 7 mmol/l, further increases were seen, with GLP-1 effects exceeding those of GIP. Insulin concentrations at the end of the three infusion periods (60, 150 and 240 min) during the GIP clamp amounted to 53+/-5, 79+/-8 and 113+/-15 pmol/l, respectively. Corresponding results were 47+/-7, 95+/-10 and 171+/-21 pmol/l, respectively, during the GLP-1 clamp. C-peptide responses were similar. Total and intact incretin hormone concentrations during the clamp studies were higher compared to the meal test, but within physiological limits. Glucose infusion alone significantly inhibited glucagon secretion, which was further inhibited by GLP-1 but not by GIP infusion. We conclude that during normal physiological plasma glucose levels, glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide contribute nearly equally to the incretin effect in humans, because their differences in concentration and potency outweigh each other.     

Glucose dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) infused intravenously is insulinotropic in the fasting state in type 2 (non-insulin dependent) diabetes mellitus

The effects of an intravenous infusion of porcine GIP on beta-cell secretion in patients with untreated type 2 diabetes mellitus have been studied. The subjects were studied on two separate days. After a 10 h overnight fast and a further 120 min basal period they were given an intravenous infusion of porcine GIP (2 pmol.kg-1.min-1) or control solution in random order from 120-140 min. Frequent plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide and GIP measurements were made throughout and the study was continued until 200 min. Plasma glucose levels were similar throughout both tests. During the GIP infusion there was an early significant rise in insulin concentration from 0.058 +/- 0.006 nmol/l to 0.106 +/- 0.007 nmol/l (P less than 0.01) within 6 min of commencing the GIP infusion and insulin levels reached a peak of 0.131 +/- 0.011 nmol/l at 10 min (P less than 0.01). Insulin levels remained significantly elevated during the rest of the GIP infusion (P less than 0.01-0.001) and returned to basal values 20 min post infusion. No change in basal insulin values was seen during the control infusion. C-peptide levels were similarly raised during the GIP infusion and the increase was significant just 4 min after commencing the GIP infusion (P less than 0.05). GIP levels increased from 16 +/- 3 pmol/l prior to the infusion to a peak of 286 +/- 24 pmol/l 20 min later. At 4 min when a significant beta-cell response was observed GIP levels were well within the physiological range.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The effect of weight reduction on plasma concentrations of ghrelin and insulin-like growth factor 1 in obese women

Introduction: The aim of the present study was to examine how weight loss treatment modulates plasma concentrations of ghrelin and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) in obese women and to determine whether there is any association with possible changes in plasma concentrations of these hormones after weight loss. Material and methods: The study group consisted of 22 obese women without additional disease (age 40.6 +/- 12.9 years; BMI 37.2 +/- 4.6 kg/m(2)). All subjects participated in a 3-month weight reduction program. The measurements were performed at baseline and after weight loss. Plasma concentration of ghrelin and IGF-1 were measured by enzyme - linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit. Serum concentrations of insulin were measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA). Body composition was determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis using a Bodystat analyser. Results: The mean weight loss was 9.3 +/- 4.1 kg (9.7 +/- 4.3%). Following weight loss, plasma ghrelin and IGF-1 concentrations increased significantly (63.5 +/- 13.0 vs. 72.8 +/- 15.1 pg/ml; p < 0.01; 126.9 +/- 67.0 vs. 170.5 +/- 83.3 ng/ml p < 0.01, respectively) and serum insulin concentrations decreased significantly (17.5 +/- 8.5 vs. 14.8 +/- 10.4 mIU/ml p< 0.05). We observed a significant positive correlation between the increase of ghrelin and decrease of body fat percentage after weight loss (r = 0.44, p = 0.03). There are no correlations between change of ghrelin and IGF-1concentrations and between changes of insulin and IGF 1 concentrations. Conclusion: Plasma concentrations of ghrelin and IGF-1 increased after weight loss. However, it seems there is no association between serum concentrations of ghrelin and IGF-1 in obese women.     

Effect of GIP, GLP-1, insulin and gastrin on ghrelin release in the isolated rat stomach

Ghrelin release in man depends on the macronutrient composition of the test meal. The mechanisms contributing to the differential regulation are largely unknown. To elucidate their potential role, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP), insulin, gastrin and somatostatin were examined on isolated rat stomach ghrelin secretion, which offers the advantage of avoiding systemic interactions. Basal ghrelin secretion was in a range that did not permit to consistently evaluate inhibiting effects. Therefore, the effect of gastrointestinal hormones and insulin was analyzed during vagal prestimulation. GLP-1(7-36)amide 10(-8) and 10(-7) M decreased ghrelin secretion significantly. In contrast, GIP 10(-8) and 10(-7) M augmented not only prestimulated, but also basal ghrelin secretion (p<0.05). Insulin reduced ghrelin at 10(-10), 10(-8) and 10(-6) M (p<0.05). Both gastrin 10(-8) M and somatostatin 10(-6) M also significantly inhibited ghrelin secretion. These data demonstrate that GLP-1(7-36)amide, insulin, gastrin and somatostatin are potential candidates to contribute to the postprandially observed inhibition of ghrelin secretion with insulin being the most effective inhibitor in this isolated stomach model. GIP, on the other hand, could attenuate the postprandial decrease. Because protein-rich meals do not effectively stimulate GIP release, other as yet unknown intestinal factors must be responsible for protein-induced stimulation of ghrelin release.     

Plasma levels of total and active ghrelin in acromegaly and growth hormone deficiency

Ghrelin is an endogenous growth hormone (GH) secretagogue recently isolated from the stomach. Although it possesses a strong GH releasing activity in vitro and in vivo, its physiological significance in endogenous GH secretion remains unclear. The aim of this study was to characterize plasma ghrelin levels in acromegaly and growth hormone deficiency (GHD). We investigated plasma total and active ghrelin in 21 patients with acromegaly, 9 patients with GHD and 24 age-, sex- and BMI-matched controls. In all subjects, we further assessed the concentrations of leptin, soluble leptin receptor, insulin, IGF-I, free IGF-I and IGFBP-1, 2, 3 and 6. Patients with acromegaly and GHD as well as control subjects showed similar levels of total ghrelin (controls 2.004+/-0.18 ng/ml, acromegalics 1.755+/-0.16 ng/ml, p=0.31, GHD patients 1.704+/-0.17 ng/ml, p=0.35) and active ghrelin (controls 0.057+/-0.01 ng/ml, acromegalics 0.047+/-0.01 ng/ml, p=0.29, GHD patients 0.062+/-0.01 ng/ml, p=0.73). In acromegalic patients plasma total ghrelin values correlated negatively with IGF-I (p<0.05), in GHD patients active ghrelin correlated with IGF-I positively (p<0.05). In the control group, total ghrelin correlated positively with IGFBP-2 (p<0.05) and negatively with active ghrelin (p=0.05), BMI (p<0.05), WHR (p<0.05), insulin (p=0.01) and IGF-I (p=0.05). Plasma active ghrelin correlated positively with IGFBP-3 (p=0.005) but negatively with total ghrelin and free IGF-I (p=0.01). In conclusion, all groups of the tested subjects showed similar plasma levels of total and active ghrelin. In acromegaly and growth hormone deficiency plasma ghrelin does not seem to be significantly affected by changes in GH secretion.     

Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) concentration in human amniotic fluid

Several studies report that placenta and amniotic fluid (AF) may be a source of many peptide hormones. Although the presence of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) in amniotic fluid has not been described, it is present in the fetal gut. In this study we report the presence of insulin and GIP in human AF of normal and diabetic pregnancies. GIP concentrations in the AF collected two hours after an arginine tolerance test (ATT), at 34-36 weeks of gestation, were evaluated in 8 normal and 53 diabetic pregnant women. GIP was found in all samples of AF. The mean AF-GIP concentrations were 133 +/- 19 pmol/l in controls and 111 +/- 6 pmol/l in the diabetics, being the GIP values of the diabetics belonging to White Class B significantly lower than those of normals (99 +/- 10 vs 133 +/- 19 pmol/l). The GIP/IRI molar ratio was significantly lower in the diabetics than in controls (1.2 +/- 0.2 vs 2.5 +/- 0.4); moreover the GIP/IRI molar ratio was significantly higher in AF collected from diabetic pregnant women who delivered overweight infants than in AF of normal weight infants or controls. This finding would suggest a negative feedback mechanism between GIP and insulin in fetus.     

Effects of ghrelin on insulin and glucagon secretion: a study of isolated pancreatic islets and intact mice

We combined in vitro and in vivo methods to investigate the effects of ghrelin, a novel gastric hormone, on insulin and glucagon release. Studies of isolated mouse islets showed that ghrelin concentrations in the physiological range (0.5-3 nmol l(-1)) had no effect on glucose-stimulated insulin release, while low ghrelin concentrations (1-100 pmol l(-1)) inhibited and high (0.1 and 1 micromol l(-1)) stimulated. The insulin response to glucose was enhanced in the presence of a high ghrelin concentration (100 nmol l(-1)). Glucagon release was stimulated by ghrelin (0.1 pmol l(-1) to 1 micromol l(-1)); this effect was maintained in the presence of glucose (0-20 mmol l(-1)). In intact mice, basal plasma insulin was suppressed by 1 and 10 nmol kg(-1) of ghrelin, 2 and 6 min after i.v. injection. Ghrelin (0.2-10 nmol kg(-1) i.v.) suppressed also the glucose-stimulated insulin response and impaired the glucose tolerance (at a ghrelin dose of 3.3 nmol kg(-1)). Ghrelin (1 or 10 nmol kg(-1) i.v.) inhibited the insulin response to the phospholipase C stimulating agent carbachol and enhanced the insulin response to the phosphodiesterase inhibitor isobutyl-methylxanthine (IBMX) but did not affect the response to the membrane-depolarizing amino acid l-arginine. These observations suggest that the inhibitory effect of ghrelin on glucose-induced insulin release is in part exerted on phospholipase C pathways (and not on Ca(2+)entry), while the stimulatory effect of high doses of ghrelin depends on cyclic AMP. In contrast to the spectacular glucagon-releasing effect of ghrelin in vitro, ghrelin did not raise plasma glucagon. Carbachol, IBMX and l-arginine stimulated glucagon release. These responses were impaired by ghrelin, suggesting that it suppresses the various intracellular pathways (phospholipase C, cyclic AMP and Ca(2+)), that are activated by the glucagon secretagogues. Together these observations highlight (but do not explain) the different effects of ghrelin on glucagon release in vitro and in vivo. The results show that ghrelin has powerful effects on islet cells, suggesting that endogenous ghrelin may contribute to the physiological control of insulin and glucagon release. However, the narrow "window" of circulating ghrelin concentrations makes this doubtful.     

Secretion of incretin hormones (GIP and GLP-1) and incretin effect after oral glucose in first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Since insulin secretion in response to exogenous gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) is diminished not only in patients with type 2 diabetes, but also in their normal glucose-tolerant first-degree relatives, it was the aim to investigate the integrity of the entero-insular axis in such subjects. METHODS: Sixteen first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes (4 male, 12 female, age 50+/-12 years, BMI 26.1+/-3.8 kg/m(2)) and 10 matched healthy controls (negative family history, 6 male, 4 female, 45+/-13 years, 26.1+/-4.2 kg/m(2)) were examined with an oral glucose load (75 g) and an "isoglycaemic" intravenous glucose infusion. Blood was drawn over 240 min for plasma glucose (glucose oxidase), insulin, C-peptide, GIP and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1; specific immunoassays). RESULTS: The pattern of glucose concentrations could precisely be copied by the intravenous glucose infusion (p=0.99). Insulin secretion was stimulated significantly more by oral as compared to intravenous glucose in both groups (p<0.0001). The percent contribution of the incretin effect was similar in both groups (C-peptide: 61.9+/-5.4 vs. 64.4+/-5.8%; p=0.77; insulin: 74.2+/-3.3 vs. 75.8+/-4.9; p=0.97; in first-degree relatives and controls, respectively). The individual responses of GIP and GLP-1 secretion were significantly correlated with each other (p=0.0003). The individual secretion of both GIP and GLP-1 was identified as a strong predictor of the integrated incremental insulin secretory responses as well as of the incretin effect. CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: Despite a lower insulin secretory response to exogenous GIP, incretin effects are similar in first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes and control subjects. This may be the result of a B cell secretory defect that affects stimulation by oral and intravenous glucose to a similar degree. Nevertheless, endogenous secretion of GIP and GLP-1 is a major determinant of insulin secretion after oral glucose.     

Suppression of insulin receptor binding by prolonged enteral or parenteral nutrient infusion in the rat: role of gastric inhibitory polypeptide

In the rat, prolonged enteral or parenteral alimentation with a high-carbohydrate diet results in hyperinsulinemia, which is substantially greater with the parenteral route. Supplementing the parenteral infusate with porcine gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) to approximate plasma immunoreactive GIP levels achieved with enteral feeding further increases steady-state plasma insulin and glucose concentrations, suggesting insulin resistance. We examined the effects of sustained hyperinsulinemia elicited by continuous nutrient infusion on insulin binding to isolated rat adipocytes and the modification of this response by GIP. Compared with a baseline group, both enterally and parenterally alimented groups showed decreased insulin receptor binding affinity. However, despite substantially different steady-state plasma insulin levels, insulin binding was similar with either infusion route. Factors other than plasma insulin concentration alone therefore contribute to insulin receptor down-regulation during prolonged enteral alimentation. Supplementing the parenteral infusate with exogenous GIP resulted in a further reduction in insulin receptor affinity. Thus, adaptation to continuous nutrient infusion is characterized by insulin receptor down-regulation regardless of the route of nutrient delivery. An additional suppression of insulin receptor binding may in part be responsible for the insulin resistance elicited by prolonged exogenous GIP administration.     

Failure of chronic hyperinsulinemia to suppress pancreatic glucagon in vivo in the rat.

To determine the effects of chronic hyperinsulinemia on glucagon release, rats were made hyperinsulinemic for 14 days by supplementation of drinking water with sucrose (10%; sucrose-fed) to increase endogenous release or by implantation of osmotic minipumps (subcutaneous, s.c.; or intraperitoneal, i.p.) to deliver exogenous insulin (6 U/day). Both s.c. and i.p. rats also had sucrose in the drinking water to prevent hypoglycemia. Plasma insulin levels were significantly elevated in sucrose-fed, s.c., and i.p. rats. However, glucose levels were significantly elevated in sucrose-fed rats only. Surprisingly, plasma glucagon concentrations were elevated in i.p. and s.c. rats and were not suppressed in sucrose-fed rats. Inverse relationships were found between the plasma levels of insulin and glucose (n = 65; r = -0.42, p less than 0.0001) and between glucose and glucagon (n = 73; r = -0.46, p less than 0.0001). However, unexpectedly, a positive correlation between insulin and glucagon (n = 65; r = 0.47, p less than 0.0001) was established. As suppression of plasma glucagon levels below basal was not observed in any of the hyperinsulinemic or hyperglycemic rats, we wished to establish further whether pancreatic glucagon release could be suppressed below basal levels in the rat by another means. Thus, high doses of somatostatin (50-100 micrograms.kg-1.min-1) were infused for 45 min into normal rats without or with a concomitant hyperinsulinemic, hyperglycemic glucose clamp. Somatostatin fully suppressed insulin, but although plasma glucagon levels were decreased by somatostatin infusion relative to saline-infused animals, there was still no suppression below basal levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Impairment of the insulinotropic effect of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) in obese and diabetic rats is related to the down-regulation of its pancreatic receptors

The association of obesity with type 2 diabetes mellitus has been recognized for years. In type 2 diabetes, there is a possibility that an important part of the impaired insulin secretion is due to the gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) hormone. This study investigated changes that occur in the pancreatic GIP receptors' (GIP-Rs) expression and in GIP secretion in obese and type 2 diabetic rats and its relation to plasma glucose and insulin levels during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) compared to control rats. During the first 20 min of the OGTT, both the obese and the diabetic rats had a significant increase in the glucose excursion and a significant decrease in early-insulin secretion compared to the control group, with more prominent changes in the diabetic group. The obese rats had a significant increase in fasting GIP level and in the incremental change of GIP from 0 to 20 min (GIP Delta 0-20: 60.1 + or - 6.66 pmol/l) compared to that of the control (33.96 + or - 4.69 pmol/l) and the diabetic (29.34 + or - 2.62 pmol/l) group, which were not significantly different from each other. However, there was a significant decrease in GIP-Rs expression in both the obese (88.07 + or - 10.36 microg/ml) and diabetic (87.51 + or - 4.72 microg/ml) groups compared to the control group (120.35 + or - 8.06 microg/ml). During the second hour of the OGTT, plasma GIP was decreasing in all groups, however, the obese group had a significant hyperinsulinemia compared to the other two groups. Moreover, the diabetic group had a significantly lower plasma insulin level until the 90 min interval and thereafter it showed a non-significant difference compared to the control group. In conclusion, both obese and diabetic rats had an impaired early-phase insulinotropic effect of GIP due to impaired gene expression of GIP-Rs which could be a potential target to prevent transition of obesity to diabetes and to improve insulin secretion in the latter.     

Effects of gastric emptying on the postprandial ghrelin response

Distension and chemosensitization of the stomach are insufficient to induce a ghrelin response, suggesting that postgastric feedback is required. This postgastric feedback may be regulated through insulin. We investigated the relation between gastric emptying rate and the postprandial ghrelin response as well as the role of insulin and other hormones possibly mediating this response. Fifteen healthy men [BMI 21.6 kg/m2 (SD 1.9), age 20.5 yr (SD 2.5)] were studied in a single-blind, crossover design. Subjects received two treatments separated by 1 wk: 1) a dairy breakfast in combination with a 3-h intravenous infusion of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), which delays gastric emptying, and 2) a dairy breakfast in combination with a 3-h intravenous infusion of saline. Blood samples were drawn before breakfast and during the infusion. Postprandial ghrelin (total) responses were lower following the saline infusion compared with the GLP-1 infusion (P < 0.05). Acetaminophen concentrations, an indirect measurement of gastric emptying rate, were inversely correlated with total ghrelin concentrations (saline r = -0.76; 95% CI = -0.90, -0.49, GLP-1 r = -0.47; 95% CI = -0.76, -0.04). Ghrelin concentrations were only weakly correlated with insulin concentrations (saline r = -0.36; 95% CI = -0.69, 0.09; GLP- 1 r = -0.42; 95% CI = -0.73, 0.03), but strongly inversely correlated with GIP concentrations (saline r = -0.74; 95% CI= -0.89, -0.45; GLP-1 r = -0.63; 95% CI = -0.84, -0.27). In conclusion, our results support the hypothesis that ghrelin requires postgastric feedback, which may not be regulated through insulin. Conversely, our data suggest a role of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide in ghrelin secretion.