Constitutive G(i2)-dependent activation of adenylyl cyclase type II by the 5-HT1A receptor. Inhibition by anxiolytic partial agonists

The 5-HT1A receptor is implicated in depression and anxiety. This receptor couples to G(i) proteins to inhibit adenylyl cyclase (AC) activity but can stimulate AC in tissues (e.g. hippocampus) that express ACII. The role of ACII in receptor-mediated stimulation of cAMP formation was examined in HEK-293 cells transfected with the 5-HT1A receptor, which mediated inhibition of basal and G(s)-induced cAMP formation in the absence of ACII. In cells cotransfected with 5-HT1A receptor and ACII plasmids, 5-HT1A agonists induced a 1. 5-fold increase in cAMP level. Cotransfection of 5-HT1A receptor, ACII, and Galpha(i2), but not Galpha(i1), Galpha(i3), or Galpha(o), resulted in an agonist-independent 6-fold increase in the basal cAMP level, suggesting that G(i2) preferentially coupled the receptor to ACII. The 5-HT1B receptor also constitutively activated ACII. Constitutive activity of the 5-HT1A receptor was blocked by pertussis toxin and the Gbetagamma antagonist, betaCT, suggesting an important role for Gbetagamma-mediated activation of ACII. The Thr-149 --> Ala mutation in the second intracellular domain of the 5-HT1A receptor disrupted Gbetagamma-selective activation of ACII. Spontaneous 5-HT1A receptor activity was partially attenuated by 5-HT1A receptor partial agonists with anxiolytic activity (e.g. buspirone and flesinoxan) but was not altered by full agonists or antagonists. Thus, anxiolytic activity may involve inhibition of spontaneous 5-HT1A receptor activity.     

Generation of mice expressing the human glucagon receptor with a direct replacement vector

The process of evaluating the in vivo efficacy of non–peptidyl receptor antagonists in animal models is frequently complicated by failure of compounds displaying high affinity against the human receptors to show measurable affinity at the corresponding rodent receptors. In order to generate a suitable animal model in which to evaluate the in vivo activity of non–peptidyl glucagon receptor antagonists, we have utilized a direct targeting approach to replace the murine glucagon receptor with the human glucagon receptor gene by homologous recombination. Specific expression of the human glucagon receptor (GR) in the livers of transgenic mice was confirmed with an RNase protection assay, and the pharmacology of the human GRs expressed in the livers of these mice parallels that of human GR in a recombinant CHO cell line with respect to both binding of ¹²⁵I–glucagon and the ability of glucagon to stimulate cAMP production. L–168,049, a non–peptidyl GR antagonist selective for the human GR shows a 3.5 fold higher affinity for liver membrane preparations of human GR expressing mice (IC₅₀=172±98nM) in the presence of MgCl₂ in marked contrast to the measured affinity of the murine receptor (IC₅₀=611±97nM) for this non–peptidyl antagonist. The human receptors expressed are functional as measured by the ability of glucagon to stimulate cAMP production and the selectivity of this antagonist for the human receptor is further verified by its ability to block glucagon–stimulated cyclase activity with 5 fold higher potency (IC₅₀=97.2±13.9nM) than for the murine receptor (IC₅₀=504±247nM). Thus we have developed a novel animal model for evaluating GR antagonists in vivo. These mice offer the advantage that the regulatory sequences which direct tissue specific and temporal expression of the GR have been unaltered and thus expression of the human gene in these mice remains in the normal chromosomal context.     

Effective information transfer from the alpha 1b-adrenoceptor to Galpha 11 requires both beta/gamma interactions and an aromatic group four amino acids from the C terminus of the G protein

Co-expression of the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor and Galpha(11) in cells derived from a Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) knock-out mouse allows agonist-mediated elevation of intracellular Ca(2+) levels that is transduced by beta/gamma released from the G protein alpha subunit. Mutation of Tyr(356) of Galpha(11) to Phe, within a receptor contact domain, had little effect on function but this was reduced greatly by alteration to Ser and virtually eliminated by conversion to Asp. This pattern was replicated following incorporation of each form of Galpha(11) into fusion proteins with the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor. Following a [(35)S]guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTPgammaS) binding assay, immunoprecipitation of the wild type alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor-Galpha(11) fusion protein indicated that the agonist phenylephrine stimulated guanine nucleotide exchange on Galpha(11) more than 30-fold. Information transfer by agonist was controlled in residue 356 Galpha(11) mutants with rank order Tyr > Phe > Trp > Ile > Ala = Gln = Arg > Ser > Asp, although these alterations did not alter the binding affinity of either phenylephrine or an antagonist ligand. Mutation of a beta/gamma contact interface in the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor-Tyr(356) Galpha(11) fusion protein did not alter ligand binding affinity but did reduce greatly beta/gamma binding and phenylephrine stimulation of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding. It also prevented agonist elevation of intracellular Ca(2+) levels, as did a mutation in Galpha(11) that prevents G protein subunit dissociation. These results indicate that a bulky aromatic group is required four amino acids from the C terminus of Galpha(11) to maximize information transfer from an agonist-occupied receptor and disprove the hypothesis that tyrosine phosphorylation of this residue is required for G protein activation (Umemori, H., Inoue, T., Kume, S., Sekiyama, N., Nagao, M., Itoh, H., Nakanishi, S., Mikoshiba, K., and Yamamoto, T. (1997) Science 276, 1878-1881). This is distinct from Galpha(i1), where hydrophobicity of the amino acid is the key determinant at this location. They also further demonstrate a key role for the beta/gamma complex in enhancing receptor to G protein alpha subunit information transfer.     

The [35S]GTPgammaS binding assay: approaches and applications in pharmacology

Receptors of the of seven transmembrane spanning, heterotrimeric G protein coupled family (GPCR) play crucial roles in regulating physiological functions and consequently are targets for the action of many classes of drugs. Activation of receptor by agonist leads to the dissociation of GDP from Galpha of the Galphabetagamma heterotrimer, followed by the binding of GTP to Galpha and subsequent modulation of downstream effectors. The G protein heterotrimer is reformed by GTPase activity of the Galpha subunit, forming Galpha-GDP and so allowing Galpha and Gbetagamma to recombine. The [35S]GTPgammaS assay measures the level of G protein activation following agonist occupation of a GPCR, by determining the binding of the non-hydrolyzable analog [35S]GTPgammaS to Galpha subunits. Thus, the assay measures a functional consequence of receptor occupancy at one of the earliest receptor-mediated events. The assay allows for traditional pharmacological parameters of potency, efficacy and antagonist affinity, with the advantage that agonist measures are not subjected to amplification or other modulation that may occur when analyzing parameters further downstream of the receptor. In general the assay is experimentally more feasible for receptors coupled to the abundant G(i/o) proteins. Nevertheless, [35S]GTPgammaS binding assays are used with GPCRs that couple to the G(s) and G(q) families of G proteins, especially in artificial expression systems, or using receptor-Galpha constructs or immunoprecipitation of [35S]GTPgammaS-labeled Galpha. The relative simplicity of the assay has made it very popular and its use is providing insights into contemporary pharmacological topics including the roles of accessory proteins in signaling, constitutive activity of receptors and agonist specific signaling.     

Molecular dissection of G protein preference using Gsalpha chimeras reveals novel ligand signaling of GPCRs

Although only 16 genes have been identified in mammals, several Galpha subunits can be simultaneously activated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to modulate their complicated functions. Current GPCR assays are limited in the evaluation of selective Galpha activation, thus not allowing a comprehensive pathway screening. Because adenylyl cyclases are directly activated by G(s)alpha and the carboxyl termini of the various Galpha proteins determine their receptor coupling specificity, we proposed a set of chimeric G(s)alpha where the COOH-terminal five amino acids are replaced by those of other Galpha proteins and used these to dissect the potential Galpha linked to a given GPCR. Unlike G(q)alpha, G(12)alpha, and G(i)alpha outputs, compounding the signals from several Galpha members, the chimeric G(s)alpha proteins provide a superior molecular approach that reflects the previously uncharacterized pathways of GPCRs under the same cAMP platform. This is, to our knowledge, the first time allowing verification of the whole spectrum of Galpha coupling preference of adenosine A1 receptor, reported to couple to multiple G proteins and modulate many physiological processes. Furthermore, we were able to distinguish the uncharacterized pathways between the two neuromedin U receptors (NMURs), which distribute differently but are stimulated by a common agonist. In contrast to the G(q) signals mainly conducted by NMUR1, NMUR2 routed preferentially to the G(i) pathways. Dissecting the potential Galpha coupling to these GPCRs will promote an understanding of their physiological roles and benefit the pharmaceutical development of agonists/antagonists by exploiting the selective affinity toward a certain Galpha subclass.     

Investigation of the role of the carboxyl-terminal tails of the alpha and beta isoforms of the human thromboxane A(2) receptor (TP) in mediating receptor:effector coupling

We have investigated the functional coupling of alpha and beta isoforms of the human thromboxane A(2) receptor (TP) to Galpha(16) and Galpha(12) members of the G(q) and G(12) families of heterotrimeric G proteins in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cell lines HEK.alpha10 or HEK.beta3, stably over-expressing TPalpha and TPbeta, respectively. Moreover, using HEK.TP(Delta328) cells which over-express a variant of TP truncated at the point of divergence of TPalpha and TPbeta, we investigated the requirement of the C-tail per se in mediating G protein coupling and effector activation. Both TPalpha and TPbeta couple similarly to Galpha(16) to affect increases in inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP(3)) and mobilisation of intracellular calcium ([Ca(2+)](i)) in response to the TP agonist U46619. Whilst both TP isoforms mediated [Ca(2+)](i) mobilisation in cells co-transfected with Galpha(12), neither receptor generated corresponding increases in IP(3), indicating that the Galpha(12)-mediated increases in [Ca(2+)](i) do not involve PLC activation. Verapamil, an inhibitor of voltage dependent Ca(2+) channels, reduced [Ca(2+)](i) mobilisation in TPalpha and TPbeta cells co-transfected with Galpha(12) to approximately 40% of that mobilised in its absence, whereas [8-(N,N-diethylamino)-octyl-3,4, 5-trimethoxybenzoate, hydrochloride] (TMB-8), an antagonist of intracellular Ca(2+) release, had no effect on [Ca(2+)](i) mobilisation by either receptor isoform co-transfected with Galpha(12). Despite the lack of differential coupling specificity by TPalpha and TPbeta, TP(Delta328) signalled more efficiently in the absence of a co-transfected G protein compared to the wild type receptors but, on the other hand, displayed an impaired ability to couple to co-transfected Galpha(11), Galpha(12) or Galpha(16) subunits. In studies investigating the role of the C-tail in influencing coupling to the effector adenylyl cyclase, similar to TPalpha but not TPbeta, TP(Delta328) coupled to Galpha(s), leading to increased adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP), rather than to Galpha(i). Whereas TP(Delta328) signalled more efficiently in the absence of co-transfected G protein compared to the wild type TPalpha, co-transfection of Galpha(s) did not augment cAMP generation by TP(Delta328). Hence, from these studies involving the wild type TPalpha, TPbeta and TP(Delta328), we conclude that the C-tail sequences of TP are not a major determinant of G protein coupling specificity to Galpha(11) and Galpha(16) members of the G(q) family or to Galpha(12); it may play a role in determining G(s) versus G(i) coupling and may act as a determinant of coupling efficiency.     

Effects of partial agonists and Mg2+ ions on the interaction of M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor and G protein Galpha i1 subunit in the M2-Galpha i1 fusion protein

We have expressed a M(2)-Galpha(i1) fusion protein in insect cells, in which the G protein alpha(i1) subunit was fused with a mutant of the muscarinic receptor M(2) subtype without glycosylation sites and the central part of the third intracellular loop. The M(2)-Galpha(i1) fusion protein showed GTP-sensitive, high-affinity agonist binding. Displacement curves by GDP of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding shifted to the right in the presence of muscarinic agonists. The extent of the shift was greater for full agonists (120-150 fold) than for partial agonists (25-35 fold), and virtually no shift was observed for antagonists. The affinity for GDP decreased with increasing MgCl(2) concentration in the presence of an agonist but was not affected by MgCl(2) in the presence of an antagonist. These results indicate that the apparent affinity for GDP of the M(2)-Galpha(i1) fusion protein bound to a ligand represents the efficacy of the given ligand, and that Mg(2+) is required for the agonist-bound M(2) to interact with Galpha(i1), reducing its affinity for GDP. We propose that the agonist-M(2)-Galpha(i1) complex represents the transition state for the GDP-GTP exchange reaction catalyzed by agonist-bound receptors, and that the complex has different affinities for GDP depending on the species of the ligand bound to M(2) receptors.     

Identification of Galpha13 as one of the G-proteins that couple to human platelet thromboxane A2 receptors.

Previous studies have shown that ligand or immunoaffinity chromatography can be used to purify the human platelet thromboxane A2 (TXA2) receptor-Galphaq complex. The same principle of co-elution was used to identify another G-protein associated with platelet TXA2 receptors. It was found that in addition to Galphaq, purification of TXA2 receptors by ligand (SQ31,491)-affinity chromatography resulted in the co-purification of a member of the G12 family. Using an antipeptide antibody specific for the human G13 alpha-subunit, this G-protein was identified as Galpha13. In separate experiments, it was found that the TXA2 receptor agonist U46619 stimulated [35S]guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) incorporation into G13 alpha-subunit. Further evidence for functional coupling of G13 to TXA2 receptors was provided in studies where solubilized platelet membranes were subjected to immunoaffinity chromatography using an antibody raised against native TXA2 receptor protein. It was found that U46619 induced a significant decrease in Galphaq and Galpha13 association with the receptor protein. These results indicate that both Galphaq and Galpha13 are functionally coupled to TXA2 receptors and dissociate upon agonist activation. Furthermore, this agonist effect was specifically blocked by pretreatment with the TXA2 receptor antagonist, BM13.505. Taken collectively, these data provide direct evidence that endogenous Galpha13 is a TXA2 receptor-coupled G-protein, as: 1) its alpha-subunit can be co-purified with the receptor protein using both ligand and immunoaffinity chromatography, 2) TXA2 receptor activation stimulates GTPgammaS binding to Galpha13, and 3) Galpha13 affinity for the TXA2 receptor can be modulated by agonist-receptor activation.     

Coordinated agonist regulation of receptor and G protein palmitoylation and functional rescue of palmitoylation-deficient mutants of the G protein G11alpha following fusion to the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor: palmitoylation of G11alpha is not required for interaction with beta*gamma complex.

Transfection of either the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor or Galpha(11) into a fibroblast cell line derived from a Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) double knockout mouse failed to produce elevation of intracellular [Ca(2+)] upon the addition of agonist. Co-expression of these two polypeptides, however, produced a significant stimulation. Co-transfection of the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor with the palmitoylation-resistant C9S,C10S Galpha(11) also failed to produce a signal, and much reduced and kinetically delayed signals were obtained using either C9S Galpha(11) or C10S Galpha(11). Expression of a fusion protein between the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor and Galpha(11) allowed [Ca(2+)](i) elevation, and this was also true for a fusion protein between the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor and C9S,C10S Galpha(11), since this strategy ensures proximity of the two polypeptides at the cell membrane. For both fusion proteins, co-expression of transducin alpha, as a beta.gamma-sequestering agent, fully attenuated the Ca(2+) signal. Both of these fusion proteins and one in which an acylation-resistant form of the receptor was linked to wild type Galpha(11) were also targets for agonist-regulated [(3)H]palmitoylation and bound [(35)S]guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) in an agonist concentration-dependent manner. The potency of agonist to stimulate [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding was unaffected by the palmitoylation potential of either receptor or G protein. These studies provide clear evidence for coordinated, agonist-mediated regulation of the post-translational acylation of both a receptor and partner G protein and demonstrate the capacity of such fusions to bind and then release beta.gamma complex upon agonist stimulation whether or not the G protein can be palmitoylated. They also demonstrate that Ca(2+) signaling in EF88 cells by such fusion proteins is mediated via release of the G protein beta.gamma complex.     

Selective inhibition of heterotrimeric Gs signaling. Targeting the receptor-G protein interface using a peptide minigene encoding the Galpha(s) carboxyl terminus

The blockade of heptahelical receptor coupling to heterotrimeric G proteins by the expression of peptides derived from G protein Galpha subunits represents a novel means of simultaneously inhibiting signals arising from multiple receptors that share a common G protein pool. Here we examined the mechanism of action and functional consequences of expression of an 83-amino acid polypeptide derived from the carboxyl terminus of Galpha(s) (GsCT). In membranes prepared from GsCT-expressing cells, the peptide blocked high affinity agonist binding to beta(2) adrenergic receptors (AR) and inhibited beta(2)AR-induced [35S]GTPgammaS loading of Galpha(s). GsCT expression inhibited beta(2)AR- and dopamine D(1A) receptor-mediated cAMP production, without affecting the cellular response to cholera toxin or forskolin, indicating that the peptide inhibited receptor-G(s) coupling without impairing G protein or adenylyl cyclase function. [35S]GTPgammaS loading of Galpha(q/11) by alpha(1B)ARs and Galpha(i) by alpha(2A)ARs and G(q/11)- or G(i)-mediated phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis was unaffected, indicating that the inhibitory effects of GsCT were selective for G(s). We next employed the GsCT construct to examine the complex role of G(s) in regulation of the ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade, where activation of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) pathway reportedly produces both stimulatory and inhibitory effects on heptahelical receptor-mediated ERK activation. For the beta(2)AR in HEK-293 cells, where PKA activity is required for ERK activation, expression of GsCT caused a net inhibition of ERK activation. In contrast, alpha(2A)AR-mediated ERK activation in COS-7 cells was enhanced by GsCT expression, consistent with the relief of a downstream inhibitory effect of PKA. ERK activation by the G(q/11)-coupled alpha(1B)AR was unaffected by GsCT. These findings suggest that peptide G protein inhibitors can provide insights into the complex interplay between G protein pools in cellular regulation.     

Kinetics of ternary complex formation with fusion proteins composed of the A(1)-adenosine receptor and G protein alpha-subunits.

High affinity agonist binding to G protein-coupled receptors depends on the formation of a ternary complex between agonist, receptor, and G protein. This process is too slow to be accounted for by a simple diffusion-controlled mechanism. We have tested if the interaction between activated receptor and G protein is rate-limiting by fusing the coding sequence of the human A(1)-adenosine receptor to that of Galpha(i-1) (A(1)/Galpha(i-1)) and of Galpha(o) (A(1)/Galpha(o)). Fusion proteins of the expected molecular mass were detected following transfection of HEK293 cells. Ternary complex formation was monitored by determining the kinetics for binding of the high affinity agonist (-)-N(6)-3[(125)I](iodo-4-hydroxyphenylisopropyl)adenosine; these were similar in the wild-type receptor and the fusion proteins over the temperature range of 10 to 30 degrees C. Agonist dissociation may be limited by the stability of the ternary complex. This assumption was tested by creating fusion proteins in which the Cys(351) of Galpha(i-1) was replaced with glycine (A(1)/Galpha(i-1)C351G) or isoleucine (A(1)/Galpha(i-1)C351I) to lower the affinity of the receptor for the G protein. In these mutated fusion proteins, the dissociation rate of the ternary complex was accelerated; in contrast, the rate of the forward reaction was not affected. We therefore conclude that (i) receptor activation per se rather than its interaction with the G protein is rate-limiting in ternary complex formation; (ii) the stability of the ternary complex is determined by the dissociation rate of the G protein. These features provide for a kinetic proofreading mechanism that sustains the fidelity of receptor-G protein coupling.     

An antibody directed against residues 100-119 within the alpha-helical domain of Galpha(s) defines a novel contact site for beta-adrenergic receptors.

A polyclonal antiserum that recognizes residues 100-119 within the alpha-helical domain of Galpha(s) (K-20) caused a dissociation of G(s) into its component subunits and activated a cholera toxin-sensitive high affinity GTPase. Consistently, the antibody mimicked the stimulatory effects of the beta-adrenergic agonist, isoproterenol, on adenylyl cyclase, which is mediated by Galpha(s), and its inhibitory action on NADPH-dependent H(2)O(2) generation, a Gbetagamma-mediated response. A peptide corresponding to the target sequence of K-20 not only neutralized the receptor-mimetic effects of the antibody but inhibited the whole spectrum of isoproterenol action as well, including its antagonistic effects on adenylyl cyclase and NADPH-dependent H(2)O(2) generation. By contrast, COOH-terminal anti-Galpha(s) selectively inhibited the stimulatory effect of isoproterenol on cAMP formation without affecting its inhibitory effect on NADPH-dependent H(2)O(2) generation. The data are consistent with the concept that beta-adrenergic receptors interact with multiple sites on Galpha(s) each playing a distinct role, and strongly suggest that antibody K-20 defines a novel contact site for beta-adrenergic receptors that localizes to the alpha-helical domain and is essential for eliciting the complete spectrum of beta-adrenergic responses.     

Fluorescence analysis of receptor-G protein interactions in cell membranes

The dynamics of G protein heterotrimer complex formation and disassembly in response to nucleotide binding and receptor activation govern the rate of responses to external stimuli. We use a novel flow cytometry approach to study the effects of lipid modification, isoform specificity, lipid environment, and receptor stimulation on the affinity and kinetics of G protein subunit binding. Fluorescein-labeled myristoylated Galpha(i1) (F-alpha(i1)) was used as the ligand bound to Gbetagamma in competition binding studies with differently modified Galpha subunit isoforms. In detergent solutions, the binding affinity of Galpha(i) to betagamma was 2 orders of magnitude higher than for Galpha(o) and Galpha(s) (IC50 of 0.2 nM vs 17 and 27 nM, respectively), while in reconstituted bovine brain lipid vesicles, binding was slightly weaker. The effects of receptor on the G protein complex were assessed in alpha(2A)AR receptor expressing CHO cell membranes into which purified betagamma subunits and F-alpha(i1) were reconstituted. These cell membrane studies led to the following observations: (1) binding of alpha subunit to the betagamma was not enhanced by receptor in the presence or absence of agonist, indicating that betagamma contributed essentially all of the binding energy for alpha(i1) interaction with the membrane; (2) activation of the receptor facilitated GTPgammaS-stimulated detachment of F-alpha(i1) from betagamma and the membrane. Thus flow cytometry permits quantiatitive and real-time assessments of protein-protein interactions in complex membrane environments.     

Novel signal transduction and peptide specificity of glucagon-like peptide receptor in 3T3-L1 adipocytes

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (7–36) amide (GLP-1), in addition to its well known effect of enhancing glucose-mediated insulin release, has been shown to have insulinomimetic effects and to enhance insulin-mediated glucose uptake and lipid synthesis in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. To elucidate the mechanisms of GLP-1 action in these cells, we studied the signal transduction and peptide specificity of the GLP-1 response. In 3T3-L1 adipocytes, GLP-1 caused a decrease in intracellular cAMP levels which is the opposite to the response observed in pancreatic beta cells in response to the same peptide. In 3T3-L1 adipocytes, free intracellular calcium was not modified by GLP-1. Peptide specificity was examined to help determine if a different GLP receptor isoform was expressed in 3T3-L1 adipocytes vs. beta cells. Peptides with partial homology to GLP-1 such as GLP-2, GLP-1 (1–36), and glucagon all lowered cAMP levels in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. In addition, an antagonist of pancreatic GLP-1 receptor, exendin-4 (9–39), acted as an agonist to decrease cAMP levels in 3T3-L1 adipocytes as did exendin-4 (1–39), a known agonist for the pancreatic GLP-1 receptor. Binding studies using ¹²⁵I-GLP-1 also suggest that pancreatic GLP-1 receptor isoform is not responsible for the effect of GLP-1 and related peptides in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Based on these results, we propose that the major form of the GLP receptor in 3T3-L1 adipocytes is functionally different from the pancreatic GLP-1 receptor. J. Cell. Physiol. 172:275–283, 1997. Published 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

1 This article was prepared by a group of United States government employees and non-United States government employees, and as such is subject to 17 U.S.C. Sec. 105.

     

The receptor-Galpha fusion protein as a tool for ligand screening: a model study using a nociceptin receptor-Galphai2 fusion protein

As a model system to screen endogenous ligands for G(i)-coupled receptors, we have prepared and characterized a fusion protein of nociceptin receptor and alpha subunit of G(i2). We detected nociceptin binding to the fusion protein by measuring stimulation of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding with an EC(50) of 2.0 nM and a gain of approximately five times. The stimulation by nociceptin of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to the fusion protein was clearly observed in the presence of an appropriate concentration of GDP, because the affinity for GDP was decreased in the presence of agonist. Full and partial agonists differed in their effects on apparent the affinity of the fusion protein for GDP: the IC(50) values for GDP to displace 100 pM [(35)S]GTPgammaS were estimated to be 2 micro M, 0.4 micro M, and 0.05 micro M in the presence of full agonist (nociceptin), partial agonist (F/G-NC), and antagonist (NBZH), respectively. We also detected the activity to stimulate [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to the fusion protein in the brain extract derived from 2-3 g wet weight tissue without false-positive results. The active component was identified as endogenous nociceptin itself. These results indicate that the fusion protein of GPCR and Galpha(i) is useful for screening of endogenous ligands.     

Cysteine residues are involved in structure and function of melanocortin 1 receptor: Substitution of a cysteine residue in transmembrane segment two converts an agonist to antagonist

Reduction of disulfide bonds in human melanocortin 1 receptor (hMC1R) with increasing concentrations of DTT (dithiothreitol) resulted in a decrease in the binding of [125I]-ACTH (adrenocorticotropic hormone, L-isomer) in an uniphasic manner and a decrease in [125I]-NDP-MSH ([Nle(4),D-Phe(7)]-alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone; D-isomer) binding in a biphasic manner. Pretreatment of hMC1R with 10 mM DTT resulted in a 36-fold loss of affinity for alpha-MSH (L-isomer) without affecting the affinity of NDP-MSH (D-isomer). To characterize the role of individual cysteine residues, we employed site-directed mutagenesis to substitute cysteine by glycine at all fourteen positions in hMC1R and analysed wild-type and mutant receptors for ligand binding and cAMP signalling. Single point mutation of four cysteine residues in extracellular loops to glycine (C35G, C267G, C273G, and C275G) resulted in a complete loss of binding for [125I]-NDP-MSH. Moreover, mutants with normal ligand binding, at positions C191G (transmembrane segment 5), C215G (third intracellular loop), and C315G (C-terminal loop) failed to generate cAMP signal in response to both agonists alpha-MSH and NDP-MSH. Mutant at position C78G (with wild-type binding to alpha-MSH as well as NDP-MSH) generated a cAMP signal in response to alpha-MSH (identical to wild-type hMC1R) but interestingly could not be stimulated by NDP-MSH. Moreover, this single amino acid substitution converted NDP-MSH from being an agonist to antagonist at the C78G mutant receptor. These findings demonstrate that (i) alpha-MSH and ACTH (L-isomers) are different from D-isomer NDP-MSH in their sensitivity to DTT for receptor binding, (ii) cysteine residues in N-terminus and extracellular loop three make disulfide bridges and are needed for structural integrity of hMC1R, (iii) cysteine residues in transmembrane segments and intracellular loops are required for receptor-G-protein coupling, (iv) C78 in transmembrane segment two is required for generating a functional response by D-isomer agonist (NDP-MSH) but not by L-isomer agonist (alpha-MSH), and (v) wild-type receptor agonist NDP-MSH is an antagonist at the mutant C78G receptor.     

Two active molecular phenotypes of the tachykinin NK1 receptor revealed by G-protein fusions and mutagenesis

The NK1 neurokinin receptor presents two non-ideal binding phenomena, two-component binding curves for all agonists and significant differences between agonist affinity determined by homologous versus heterologous competition binding. Whole cell binding with fusion proteins constructed between either Galpha(s) or Galpha(q) and the NK1 receptor with a truncated tail, which secured non-promiscuous G-protein interaction, demonstrated monocomponent agonist binding closely corresponding to either of the two affinity states found in the wild-type receptor. High affinity binding of both substance P and neurokinin A was observed in the tail-truncated Galpha(s) fusion construct, whereas the lower affinity component was displayed by the tail-truncated Galpha(q) fusion. The elusive difference between the affinity determined in heterologous versus homologous binding assays for substance P and especially for neurokinin A was eliminated in the G-protein fusions. An NK1 receptor mutant with a single substitution at the extracellular end of TM-III-(F111S), which totally uncoupled the receptor from Galpha(s) signaling, showed binding properties that were monocomponent and otherwise very similar to those observed in the tail-truncated Galpha(q) fusion construct. Thus, the heterogenous pharmacological phenotype displayed by the NK1 receptor is a reflection of the occurrence of two active conformations or molecular phenotypes representing complexes with the Galpha(s) and Galpha(q) species, respectively. We propose that these molecular forms do not interchange readily, conceivably because of the occurrence of microdomains or "signal-transductosomes" within the cell membrane.     

Functional interactions between the alpha1b-adrenoceptor and Galpha11 are compromised by de-palmitoylation of the G protein but not of the receptor

Both the alpha1b-adrenoceptor and Galpha11 are targets for post-translational thio-acylation that is regulated by agonist occupancy of the receptor [P.A. Stevens, J. Pediani, J.J. Carrillo, G. Milligan, J. Biol. Chem. 276 (2001) 35883]. In co-expression studies mutation of the sites of thio-acylation in the G protein or treatment of cell membranes with hydroxylamine greatly reduced agonist stimulation of guanosine 5'-[gamma-[35S]thio]triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding. In alpha1b-adrenoceptor-Galpha11 fusion proteins mutation of thio-acylation sites in receptor or G protein did not alter the binding affinity of the antagonist [3H]prazosin or the agonist phenylephrine. Although the potency of phenylephrine to stimulate binding of [35S]GTPgammaS to alpha1b-adrenoceptor-Galpha11 fusion proteins was unaffected by the thio-acylation potential of either element, the maximal effect was reduced by some 50% when the G protein but not the receptor was mutated to prevent thio-acylation. This reflected lack of thio-acylation of the G protein rather than mutation of Cys9 and Cys10 to Ser because treatment with hydroxylamine mimicked this in fusions containing the wild type G protein but was without effect in those mutated to prevent thio-acylation. Mutation to reduce binding of beta/gamma to Galpha11 markedly reduced phenylephrine stimulation of [35S]GTPgammaS binding. Combination of mutations to prevent thio-acylation and beta/gamma binding did not, however, have an additive effect on [35S]GTPgammaS binding. These results indicate that the thio-acylation status of the alpha1b-adrenoceptor does not regulate G protein activation whereas thio-acylation of Galpha11 plays a key role in activation by the receptor beyond providing membrane association and proximity.