Bovine herpesvirus type 4 glycoprotein L is nonessential for infectivity but triggers virion endocytosis during entry

The core entry machinery of mammalian herpesviruses comprises glycoprotein B (gB), gH, and gL. gH and gL form a heterodimer with a central role in viral membrane fusion. When archetypal alpha- or betaherpesviruses lack gL, gH misfolds and progeny virions are noninfectious. However, the gL of the rhadinovirus murid herpesvirus 4 (MuHV-4) is nonessential for infection. In order to define more generally what role gL plays in rhadinovirus infections, we disrupted its coding sequence in bovine herpesvirus 4 (BoHV-4). BoHV-4 lacking gL showed altered gH glycosylation and incorporated somewhat less gH into virions but remained infectious. However, gL(-) virions showed poor growth associated with an entry deficit. Moreover, a major part of their entry defect appeared to reflect impaired endocytosis, which occurs upstream of membrane fusion itself. Thus, the rhadinovirus gL may be more important for driving virion endocytosis than for incorporating gH into virions, and it is nonessential for membrane fusion.     

Evidence for a multiprotein gamma-2 herpesvirus entry complex

Herpesviruses use multiple virion glycoproteins to enter cells. How these work together is not well understood: some may act separately or they may form a single complex. Murine gammaherpesvirus 68 (MHV-68) gB, gH, gL, and gp150 all participate in entry. gB and gL are involved in binding, gB and gH are conserved fusion proteins, and gp150 inhibits cell binding until glycosaminoglycans are engaged. Here we show that a gH-specific antibody coprecipitates gB and thus that gH and gB are associated in the virion membrane. A gH/gL-specific antibody also coprecipitated gB, implying a tripartite complex of gL/gH/gB, although the gH/gB association did not require gL. The association was also independent of gp150, and gp150 was not demonstrably bound to gB or gH. However, gp150 incorporation into virions was partly gL dependent, suggesting that it too contributes to a single entry complex. gp150⁻ and gL⁻ gp150⁻ mutants bound better than the wild type to B cells and readily colonized B cells in vivo. Thus, gp150 and gL appear to be epithelial cell-adapted accessories of a core gB/gH entry complex. The cell binding revealed by gp150 disruption did not require gL and therefore seemed most likely to involve gB.     

Soluble Epstein-Barr virus glycoproteins gH, gL, and gp42 form a 1:1:1 stable complex that acts like soluble gp42 in B-cell fusion but not in epithelial cell fusion

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a herpesvirus that infects cells by fusing its lipid envelope with the target cell membrane. The fusion process requires the actions of viral glycoproteins gH, gL, and gB for entry into epithelial cells and additionally requires gp42 for entry into B cells. To further study the roles of these membrane-associated glycoproteins, purified soluble forms of gp42, gH, and gL were expressed that lack the membrane-spanning regions. The soluble gH/gL protein complex binds to soluble gp42 with high affinity, forming a stable heterotrimer with 1:1:1 stoichiometry, and this complex is not formed by an N-terminally truncated variant of gp42. The effects of adding soluble gp42, gH/gL, and gH/gL/gp42 were examined with a virus-free cell-cell fusion assay. The results demonstrate that, in contrast to gp42, membrane fusion does not proceed with secreted gH/gL. The addition of soluble gH/gL does not inhibit or enhance B-cell or epithelial cell fusion when membrane-bound gH/gL, gB, and gp42 are present. However, the soluble gH/gL/gp42 complex does activate membrane fusion with B cells, similarly to soluble gp42, but it does not inhibit fusion with epithelial cells, as observed for gp42 alone. A gp42 peptide, derived from an N-terminal segment involved in gH/gL interactions, binds to soluble gH/gL and inhibits EBV-mediated epithelial cell fusion, mimicking gp42. These observations reveal distinct functional requirements for gH/gL and gp42 complexes in EBV-mediated membrane fusion.     

Herpesvirus glycoproteins undergo multiple antigenic changes before membrane fusion

Herpesvirus entry is a complicated process involving multiple virion glycoproteins and culminating in membrane fusion. Glycoprotein conformation changes are likely to play key roles. Studies of recombinant glycoproteins have revealed some structural features of the virion fusion machinery. However, how the virion glycoproteins change during infection remains unclear. Here using conformation-specific monoclonal antibodies we show in situ that each component of the Murid Herpesvirus-4 (MuHV-4) entry machinery--gB, gH/gL and gp150--changes in antigenicity before tegument protein release begins. Further changes then occurred upon actual membrane fusion. Thus virions revealed their final fusogenic form only in late endosomes. The substantial antigenic differences between this form and that of extracellular virions suggested that antibodies have only a limited opportunity to block virion membrane fusion.     

Capturing the herpes simplex virus core fusion complex (gB-gH/gL) in an acidic environment

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) entry requires the core fusion machinery of gH/gL and gB as well as gD and a gD receptor. When gD binds receptor, it undergoes conformational changes that presumably activate gH/gL, which then activates gB to carry out fusion. gB is a class III viral fusion protein, while gH/gL does not resemble any known viral fusion protein. One hallmark of fusion proteins is their ability to bind lipid membranes. We previously used a liposome coflotation assay to show that truncated soluble gB, but not gH/gL or gD, can associate with liposomes at neutral pH. Here, we show that gH/gL cofloats with liposomes but only when it is incubated with gB at pH 5. When gB mutants with single amino acid changes in the fusion loops (known to inhibit the binding of soluble gB to liposomes) were mixed with gH/gL and liposomes at pH 5, gH/gL failed to cofloat with liposomes. These data suggest that gH/gL does not directly associate with liposomes but instead binds to gB, which then binds to liposomes via its fusion loops. Using monoclonal antibodies, we found that many gH and gL epitopes were altered by low pH, whereas the effect on gB epitopes was more limited. Our liposome data support the concept that low pH triggers conformational changes to both proteins that allow gH/gL to physically interact with gB.     

Functional Fluorescent Protein Insertions in Herpes Simplex Virus gB Report on gB Conformation before and after Execution of Membrane Fusion

Entry of herpes simplex virus (HSV) into a target cell requires complex interactions and conformational changes by viral glycoproteins gD, gH/gL, and gB. During viral entry, gB transitions from a prefusion to a postfusion conformation, driving fusion of the viral envelope with the host cell membrane. While the structure of postfusion gB is known, the prefusion conformation of gB remains elusive. As the prefusion conformation of gB is a critical target for neutralizing antibodies, we set out to describe its structure by making genetic insertions of fluorescent proteins (FP) throughout the gB ectodomain. We created gB constructs with FP insertions in each of the three globular domains of gB. Among 21 FP insertion constructs, we found 8 that allowed gB to remain membrane fusion competent. Due to the size of an FP, regions in gB that tolerate FP insertion must be solvent exposed. Two FP insertion mutants were cell-surface expressed but non-functional, while FP insertions located in the crown were not surface expressed. This is the first report of placing a fluorescent protein insertion within a structural domain of a functional viral fusion protein, and our results are consistent with a model of prefusion HSV gB constructed from the prefusion VSV G crystal structure. Additionally, we found that functional FP insertions from two different structural domains could be combined to create a functional form of gB labeled with both CFP and YFP. FRET was measured with this construct, and we found that when co-expressed with gH/gL, the FRET signal from gB was significantly different from the construct containing CFP alone, as well as gB found in syncytia, indicating that this construct and others of similar design are likely to be powerful tools to monitor the conformation of gB in any model system accessible to light microscopy.     

Glycoprotein L disruption reveals two functional forms of the murine gammaherpesvirus 68 glycoprotein H

The herpesvirus glycoprotein H (gH) and gL associate to form a heterodimer that plays a central role in virus-driven membrane fusion. When archetypal alpha- or betaherpesviruses lack gL, gH misfolds and progeny virions are noninfectious. In order to define the role that gL plays in gamma-2 herpesvirus infections, we disrupted its coding sequence in murine gammaherpesvirus-68 (MHV-68). MHV-68 lacking gL folded gH into a conformation antigenically distinct from the form that normally predominates on infected cells. gL-deficient virions bound less well than the wild type to epithelial cells and fibroblasts. However, they still incorporated gH and remained infectious. The cell-to-cell spread of gL-deficient viruses was remarkably normal, as was infection, dissemination, and latency establishment in vivo. Viral membrane fusion was therefore gL independent. The major function of gL appeared to be allowing gH to participate in cell binding prior to membrane fusion. This function was most important for the entry of MHV-68 virions into fibroblasts and epithelial cells.     

Herpesvirus 6 Glycoproteins B (gB), gH,gL, and gQ Are Necessary and Sufficient for Cell-to-Cell Fusion

The human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) envelope glycoprotein gH/gL/gQ1/gQ2 complex associates with host cell CD46 as its cellular receptor. Although gB has been suggested to be involved in HHV-6 infection, its function in membrane fusion has remained unclear. Here, we have developed an HHV-6A (strain GS)and HHV-6B (strain Z29) virus-free cell-to-cell fusion assay and demonstrate that gB and the gH/gL/gQ1/gQ2 complex are the minimum components required for membrane fusion by HHV-6.     

Cascade of Events Governing Cell-Cell Fusion Induced by Herpes Simplex Virus Glycoproteins gD,gH/gL,and gB

Herpesviruses minimally require the envelope proteins gB and gH/gL for virus entry and cell-cell fusion; herpes simplex virus (HSV) additionally requires the receptor-binding protein gD. Although gB is a class III fusion protein, gH/gL does not resemble any documented viral fusion protein at a structural level. Based on those data, we proposed that gH/gL does not function as a cofusogen with gB but instead regulates the fusogenic activity of gB. Here, we present data to support that hypothesis. First, receptor-positive B78H1-C10 cells expressing gH/gL fused with receptor-negative B78H1 cells expressing gB and gD (fusion in trans). Second, fusion occurred when gH/gL-expressing C10 cells preexposed to soluble gD were subsequently cocultured with gB-expressing B78 cells. In contrast, prior exposure of gB-expressing C10 cells to soluble gD did not promote subsequent fusion with gH/gL-expressing B78 cells. These data suggest that fusion involves activation of gH/gL by receptor-bound gD. Most importantly, soluble gH/gL triggered a low level of fusion of C10 cells expressing gD and gB; a much higher level was achieved when gB-expressing C10 cells were exposed to a combination of soluble gH/gL and gD. These data clearly show that gB acts as the HSV fusogen following activation by gD and gH/gL. We suggest the following steps leading to fusion: (i) conformational changes to gD upon receptor binding, (ii) alteration of gH/gL by receptor-activated gD, and (iii) upregulation of the fusogenic potential of gB following its interaction with activated gH/gL. The third step may be common to other herpesviruses.Herpesviruses enter cells by fusing their envelopes with host cell membranes either by direct fusion at the plasma membrane or by pH-dependent or -independent endocytosis, depending on the target cell (27, 29, 39). Although the entry pathways of other enveloped viruses are similarly diverse (8), all systems for which molecular details have been obtained rely on a single fusion protein (43); herpesviruses are unique in their use of gB and the gH/gL heterodimer as their core fusion machinery (17, 37). Some herpesviruses employ additional receptor-binding glycoproteins, e.g., herpex simplex virus (HSV) gD, and others require gH/gL-associated proteins, e.g., UL128-131 of cytomegalovirus (CMV) (34) or gp42 of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) (42). This complexity has made it difficult to unravel the mechanism of herpesvirus entry.Ultrastructural and biochemical studies have shown that for HSV entry, binding of gD to one of its receptors, either HVEM or nectin-1 (36), activates the downstream events that drive gB- and gH/gL-dependent fusion (17). The structure of the gB ectodomain (18) bears striking structural homology to the postfusion form of the single fusion protein G of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) (33). However, unlike the other class III viral fusion proteins, VSV G and baculovirus gp64 (5), gB requires gH/gL to function in virus-cell and cell-cell fusion (17). A number of investigations support the concept that gH/gL might also be fusogenic (13, 41). Some have suggested that a multiprotein complex comprised of gD, gH/gL, and gB might be assembled to cause fusion (14). Using bimolecular complementation (BiMC), we and others showed that interactions can occur between half enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP)-tagged gB (e.g., gBn) and tagged gD (e.g., gDc) or between tagged gD and tagged gH (1, 3). However, because these occur in the absence of one of the other essential components, e.g., a receptor, we could not assess their functional significance. Importantly, gH/gL and gB interact with each other only in response to receptor binding by gD (1-3, 12). We subsequently showed that this interaction precedes fusion and is required for it to occur (2). Thus, we were able to conclude that gH/gL must interact with gB, whether transiently or stably, in order for fusion to occur. Whether gD was indeed involved in a multiprotein complex was not clear, nor was the role of gH/gL in promoting fusion initiated by gD-receptor binding. The lack of structural data for gH/gL left its potential role as a fusogen unresolved.However, in 2010, the structure of gH/gL of HSV-2 was solved in collaboration with Chowdary et al. (12). Structurally, gH/gL does not resemble any known viral fusogen, thereby forcing a reconsideration of its function in promoting virus-cell and cell-cell fusion. We hypothesized that gH/gL does not likely act as a cofusogen with gB but rather regulates fusion by gB (12).In this report, we argue that as a regulator of fusion, gH/gL might not have to be in the same membrane as gB in order to regulate its activity, i.e., gH/gL on one cell might promote fusion of gB expressed by another cell, as long as gD and a gD receptor are also present. In support of this, it was recently shown that gH/gL and gB of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) can cause cell-cell fusion when expressed by distinct cells (in trans) (41). We present evidence that HSV gB and gH/gL can cause cell-cell fusion when they are expressed in trans, a process that requires both gD and a gD receptor. Although the efficiency of fusion in trans is low compared with that of fusion when gB and gH/gL are in cis (as they would be when in the virus), separation of these proteins onto two different cells enabled us to dissect the order in which each protein acts along the pathway to fusion. Moreover, we found that a combination of soluble gD (not membrane bound) and soluble gH/gL (also not membrane bound) could trigger fusion of receptor-bearing cells that had been transfected with the gene for gB. Our data show that gD, gH/gL, and gB act in a series of steps whereby gD is first activated by binding its cell receptor. Previous studies showed that receptor binding causes gD to undergo conformational changes (17). Based on the data in this paper, we propose that these changes then enable gD to activate gH/gL into a form that in turn binds to and activates the fusogenic activity of gB. Although we do not know whether any of these reactions result in the formation of a stable complex, our data suggest that gB is the sole HSV fusogen and that gD and gH/gL act to upregulate cell-cell fusion and most likely virus-cell fusion, leading to HSV entry.     

Characterization of human cytomegalovirus glycoprotein-induced cell-cell fusion

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is dependent on the functions of structural glycoproteins at multiple stages of the viral life cycle. These proteins mediate the initial attachment and fusion events that occur between the viral envelope and a host cell membrane, as well as virion-independent cell-cell spread of the infection. Here we have utilized a cell-based fusion assay to identify the fusogenic glycoproteins of CMV. To deliver the glycoprotein genes to various cell lines, we constructed recombinant retroviruses encoding gB, gH, gL, and gO. Cells expressing individual CMV glycoproteins did not form multinucleated syncytia. Conversely, cells expressing gH/gL showed pronounced syncytium formation, although expression of gH or gL alone had no effect. Anti-gH neutralizing antibodies prevented syncytium formation. Coexpression of gB and/or gO with gH/gL did not yield detectably increased numbers of syncytia. For verification, these results were recapitulated in several cell lines. Additionally, we found that fusion was cell line dependent, as nonimmortalized fibroblast strains did not fuse under any conditions. Thus, the CMV gH/gL complex has inherent fusogenic activity that can be measured in certain cell lines; however, fusion in fibroblast strains may involve a more complex mechanism involving additional viral and/or cellular factors.     

Fusion between Perinuclear Virions and the Outer Nuclear Membrane Requires the Fusogenic Activity of Herpes Simplex Virus gB

Herpesviruses cross nuclear membranes (NMs) in two steps, as follows: (i) capsids assemble and bud through the inner NM into the perinuclear space, producing enveloped virus particles, and (ii) the envelopes of these virus particles fuse with the outer NM. Two herpes simplex virus (HSV) glycoproteins, gB and gH (the latter, likely complexed as a heterodimer with gL), are necessary for the second step of this process. Mutants lacking both gB and gH accumulate in the perinuclear space or in herniations (membrane vesicles derived from the inner NM). Both gB and gH/gL are also known to act directly in fusing the virion envelope with host cell membranes during HSV entry into cells, i.e., both glycoproteins appear to function directly in different aspects of the membrane fusion process. We hypothesized that HSV gB and gH/gL also act directly in the membrane fusion that occurs during virus egress from the nucleus. Previous studies of the role of gB and gH/gL in nuclear egress involved HSV gB and gH null mutants that could potentially also possess gross defects in the virion envelope. Here, we produced recombinant HSV-expressing mutant forms of gB with single amino acid substitutions in the hydrophobic “fusion loops.” These fusion loops are thought to play a direct role in membrane fusion by insertion into cellular membranes. HSV recombinants expressing gB with any one of four fusion loop mutations (W174R, W174Y, Y179K, and A261D) were unable to enter cells. Moreover, two of the mutants, W174Y and Y179K, displayed reduced abilities to mediate HSV cell-to-cell spread, and W174R and A261D exhibited no spread. All mutant viruses exhibited defects in nuclear egress, enveloped virions accumulated in herniations and in the perinuclear space, and fewer enveloped virions were detected on cell surfaces. These results support the hypothesis that gB functions directly to mediate the fusion between perinuclear virus particles and the outer NM.Herpesvirus glycoproteins gB and gH/gL participate in two separate membrane fusion events that occur during different stages of virus replication. First, during virus entry into cells, gB and gH/gL promote fusion between the virion envelope and either the plasma membrane or endosomes (reviewed in references 6, 21, 27, and 39). Second, herpes simplex virus (HSV) gB and gH (likely complexed to form a heterodimer with gL), and likely homologues in other herpesviruses, promote nuclear egress (12). Herpesvirus capsids are produced in the nucleus and cross the nuclear envelope (NE) by envelopment at the inner nuclear membrane (NM), producing perinuclear virions that then fuse with the outer NM (reviewed in references 35 and 36). There is evidence that HSV gB and gH/gL function in a redundant fashion in fusion between enveloped, perinuclear virus particles and the outer NM (12), whereas both gB and gH/gL are essential for entry fusion (8, 13, 38). Much more is known about the mechanisms involved in entry fusion than those involved in egress fusion, and many important questions remain in terms of how these two membrane fusion processes relate to each other.Entry of HSV into cells involves interactions between the viral receptor-binding protein gD and the gD receptors (16, 28, 30, 37). When gD binds to its receptors, there are conformational changes in gD which apparently activate gB and gH/gL, so that these glycoproteins promote fusion involving the virion envelope and cellular membranes (21, 32). By using split green fluorescent protein fusion proteins, also denoted bimolecular complementation, two groups showed that gD binding to gD ligands triggers interactions between gB and gH/gL and that this is accompanied by cell-cell fusion (1, 2). There is also evidence that gB and gH/gL contribute to different stages of membrane fusion. When gH/gL is expressed with gD, there is hemifusion (mixing of the outer leaflets of membranes) of adjacent cells, and this partial fusion is apparently mediated by gH/gL (41). However, full fusion (mixing of both inner and outer leaflets) occurs only when gB is coexpressed with gD and gH/gL (41). Also supporting a role for gH in membrane fusion, peptides based on heptad repeats in gH can disrupt model membranes (14, 15, 17). HSV gB is a class III fusion protein, structurally similar to vesicular stomatitis virus G protein, with a three-stranded coil-coil barrel in the central region of the molecule reminiscent of class I fusion proteins, e.g., influenza virus hemagglutinin (22). Therefore, herpesvirus gB and gH/gL differ substantially from the fusion proteins expressed by all other well-studied viruses because both gB and gH/gL participate directly in membrane fusion, apparently functioning in different aspects of entry fusion.HSV gB and other viral class III fusion proteins differ from class I fusion proteins that have N-terminal, hydrophobic fusion peptides because class III fusion proteins possess internal bipartite “fusion loops” composed of both hydrophobic and hydrophilic residues (3, 22). In the solved structure of the HSV gB ectodomain, which might represent a postfusion form of the protein, the fusion loops are located near the base of the molecule, adjacent to the virion envelope (22). Mutant forms of gB with single amino acid substitutions in these fusion loops displayed diminished cell-cell fusion activity when transfected into cells with gD and gH/gL (20). Cell-cell fusion approximates the fusion that occurs during entry, defining the minimal fusion machinery, although there are differences between entry and cell-cell fusion (10). Moreover, full-length gB molecules with fusion loop mutations failed to complement gB null HSV (19). Recently, it was demonstrated that the HSV gB extracellular domain can interact with liposomes in vitro and that this binding depends upon gB''s fusion loops (19).Herpesvirus capsids are assembled in the nucleus and acquire an envelope by budding through the inner NM. For a short time, enveloped virus particles are found in the space between the inner and outer NMs (perinuclear space), but then the envelopes of these particles fuse with the outer NM, releasing capsids into the cytoplasm (reviewed in references 35 and 36). Cytoplasmic capsids acquire a second envelope by budding into the trans-Golgi network, and this secondary envelopment involves redundant or additive functions of gE/gI and gD, i.e., either of these glycoproteins will suffice (11). The second step of the nuclear egress pathway involving membrane fusion between the envelope of perinuclear particles and the outer NM requires HSV glycoproteins gB and gH/gL (12). HSV double mutants lacking both gB and gH accumulate enveloped virus particles in the perinuclear space and in herniations, i.e., membrane vesicles that bulge into the nucleoplasm and derive from the inner NM (12). These observations, coupled with the evidence that gB and gH/gL are fusion proteins, suggested that gB and gH/gL promote the fusion between virus particles and the outer NM. However, there is one important difference between nuclear egress fusion and entry fusion. Virus mutants lacking either gB or gH are unable to enter cells, but such mutants have fewer defects in nuclear egress than double mutants lacking both gB and gH (12). Thus, as with secondary envelopment that involves gD and gE/gI, glycoproteins gB and gH/gL act in a redundant or additive fashion to mediate the fusion between the envelope of perinuclear virus particles and the outer NM. It is also important to note that there appear to be other mechanisms by which HSV particles can exit the perinuclear space. For example, although a substantial number of gB gH null double mutants accumulated in herniations (increased by ∼10-fold), some virions were seen on cell surfaces, although their numbers were reduced by ∼2.5- to 5-fold compared with those of wild-type HSV (12, 46).HSV entry fusion is triggered by gD binding to one of its ligands. However, it is not clear what triggers fusion of the envelope of perinuclear particles with the outer NM. gD, gB, gH, gM, gK, and other viral membrane proteins are all present in NMs and in perinuclear virus particles (4, 12, 25, 40, 42, 44). It seems unlikely that there are substantial quantities of known gD receptors in NMs, although this has not been carefully examined and there may well be unidentified gD receptors present in NMs. However, if fusion at NMs is not activated by gD binding to gD receptors, there must be other mechanisms to trigger this fusion. There is evidence that HSV gK negatively regulates fusion at the NE because (i) overexpression of gK causes enveloped virus particles to accumulate in the perinuclear space (25) and (ii) gK is primarily localized to the endoplasmic reticulum and NM and is not substantially found in extracellular virions (26, 34). Another potential regulatory mechanism for fusion at the outer NM involves phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic domain of gB by the HSV kinase US3 (46). An HSV recombinant lacking gH and expressing a mutant gB with a substitution, T887A, affecting an amino acid in the gB cytoplasmic domain displayed reduced US3-dependent phosphorylation and accumulated enveloped virus particles in herniations (46). This mutation in gB did not alter HSV entry into cells (31, 46). Together, these results suggest that HSV fusion with the outer NM differs from entry fusion in some, but likely not all, important mechanistic details.Given that both gB and gH/gL are well established as fusion proteins for virus entry, we hypothesized that these glycoproteins directly mediate the membrane fusion that occurs between the envelope of perinuclear virus particles and the outer NM (12, 46). However, there are other possibilities. For example, it is conceivable that loss of both gB and gH alters the structure of the envelope of perinuclear HSV virions so that other HSV glycoproteins (that directly promote fusion) are affected. To address this issue and extend our understanding of how gB functions in nuclear egress fusion, we constructed HSV recombinants that express mutant forms of gB with substitutions in the fusion loops. These viruses also lacked gH, making nuclear egress totally dependent on a functional form of gB. By propagating these recombinants using gH-expressing cells, we could produce virus particles including gH and the mutant gB molecules. These HSV recombinants expressing gH as well as gB fusion loops, W174R, W174Y, Y179K, and A261D, were all unable to enter cells. However, two recombinants, expressing W174Y and Y179K, exhibited some cell-to-cell spread while the other two, expressing W174R and A261D, did not spread beyond single infected cells. All four recombinants infected into cells lacking gH exhibited defects in nuclear egress. These results provide strong support for the hypothesis that gB acts directly to mediate the fusion of the virion envelope with the outer NM during HSV egress.     

Coiled-coil domains in glycoproteins B and H are involved in human cytomegalovirus membrane fusion

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) utilizes a complex route of entry into cells that involves multiple interactions between viral envelope proteins and cellular receptors. Three conserved viral glycoproteins, gB, gH, and gL, are required for CMV-mediated membrane fusion, but little is known of how these proteins cooperate during entry (E. R. Kinzler and T. Compton, submitted for publication). The goal of this study was to begin defining the molecular mechanisms that underlie membrane fusion mediated by herpesviruses. We identified heptad repeat sequences predicted to form alpha-helical coiled coils in two glycoproteins required for fusion, gB and gH. Peptides derived from gB and gH containing the heptad repeat sequences inhibited virus entry when introduced coincident with virus inoculation onto cells or when mixed with virus prior to inoculation. Neither peptide affected binding of CMV to fibroblasts, suggesting that the peptides inhibit membrane fusion. Both gB and gH coiled-coil peptides blocked entry of several laboratory-adapted and clinical strains of human CMV, but neither peptide affected entry of murine CMV or herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1). Although murine CMV and HSV-1 gB and gH have heptad repeat regions, the ability of human CMV gB and gH peptides to inhibit virus entry correlates with the specific residues that comprise the heptad repeat region. The ability of gB and gH coiled-coil peptides to inhibit virus entry independently of cell contact suggests that the coiled-coil regions of gB and gH function differently from those of class I, single-component fusion proteins. Taken together, these data support a critical role for alpha-helical coiled coils in gB and gH in the entry pathway of CMV.     

Binding-site interactions between Epstein-Barr virus fusion proteins gp42 and gH/gL reveal a peptide that inhibits both epithelial and B-cell membrane fusion

Herpesviruses require membrane-associated glycoproteins gB, gH, and gL for entry into host cells. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) gp42 is a unique protein also required for viral entry into B cells. Key interactions between EBV gp42 and the EBV gH/gL complex were investigated to further elucidate their roles in membrane fusion. Deletion and point mutants within the N-terminal region of gp42 revealed residues important for gH/gL binding and membrane fusion. Many five-residue deletion mutants in the N-terminal region of gp42 that exhibit reduced membrane fusion activity retain binding with gH/gL but map out two functional stretches between residues 36 and 96. Synthetic peptides derived from the gp42 N-terminal region were studied in in vitro binding experiments with purified gH/gL and in cell-cell fusion assays. A peptide spanning gp42 residues 36 to 81 (peptide 36-81) binds gH/gL with nanomolar affinity, comparable to full-length gp42. Peptide 36-81 efficiently inhibits epithelial cell membrane fusion and competes with soluble gp42 to inhibit B-cell fusion. Additionally, this peptide at low nanomolar concentrations inhibits epithelial cell infection by intact virus. Shorter gp42 peptides spanning the two functional regions identified by deletion mutagenesis had little or no binding to soluble gH/gL and were also unable to inhibit epithelial cell fusion, nor could they complement gp42 deletion mutants in B-cell fusion. These studies identify key residues of gp42 that are essential for gH/gL binding and membrane fusion activation, providing a nanomolar inhibitor of EBV-mediated membrane fusion.     

Herpes simplex virus glycoproteins gB and gD function in a redundant fashion to promote secondary envelopment

Egress of herpes simplex virus (HSV) and other herpesviruses from cells involves extensive modification of cellular membranes and sequential envelopment and deenvelopment steps. HSV glycoproteins are important in these processes, and frequently two or more glycoproteins can largely suffice in any step. Capsids in the nucleus undergo primary envelopment at the inner nuclear membrane (INM), and then enveloped virus particles undergo deenvelopment by fusing with the outer nuclear membrane (ONM). Capsids delivered into the cytoplasm then undergo secondary envelopment, involving trans-Golgi network (TGN) membranes. The deenvelopment step involves HSV glycoproteins gB and gH/gL acting in a redundant fashion. This fusion has features common to the fusion that occurs between the virion envelope and cellular membranes when HSV enters cells, a process requiring gB, gD, and gH/gL. Whether HSV gD also participates (in a redundant fashion with gB or gH/gL) in deenvelopment has not been characterized. Secondary envelopment in the cytoplasm is known to involve HSV gD and gE/gI, also acting in a redundant fashion. Whether gB might also contribute to secondary envelopment, collaborating with gD and gE/gI, is also not clear. To address these questions, we constructed an HSV double mutant lacking gB and gD. The HSV gB(-)/gD(-) mutant exhibited no substantial defects in nuclear egress. In contrast, secondary envelopment was markedly reduced, and there were numerous unenveloped capsids that accumulated in the cytoplasm, as well as increased numbers of partially enveloped capsids and morphologically aberrant enveloped particles with thicker, oblong tegument layers. These defects were different from those observed with HSV gD(-)/gE(-)/gI(-) mutants, which accumulated capsids in large, aggregated masses in the cytoplasm. Our results suggest that HSV gB functions in secondary envelopment, apparently acting downstream of gE/gI.     

The transmembrane domain and cytoplasmic tail of herpes simplex virus type 1 glycoprotein H play a role in membrane fusion

Herpes simplex virus glycoprotein H (gH) is one of the four virion envelope proteins which are required for virus entry and for cell-cell fusion in a transient system. In this report, the role of the transmembrane and cytoplasmic tail domains of gH in membrane fusion was investigated by generating chimeric constructs in which these regions were replaced with analogous domains from other molecules and by introducing amino acid substitutions within the membrane-spanning sequence. gH molecules which lack the authentic transmembrane domain or cytoplasmic tail were unable to mediate cell-cell fusion when coexpressed with gB, gD, and gL and were unable to rescue the infectivity of a gH-null virus as efficiently as a wild-type gH molecule. Many amino acid substitutions of specific amino acid residues within the transmembrane domain also affected cell-cell fusion, in particular, those introduced at a conserved glycine residue. Some gH mutants that were impaired in cell-cell fusion were nevertheless able to rescue the infectivity of a gH-negative virus, but these pseudotyped virions entered cells more slowly than wild-type virions. These results indicate that the fusion event mediated by the coexpression of gHL, gB, and gD in cells shares common features with the fusion of the virus envelope with the plasma membrane, they point to a likely role for the membrane-spanning and cytoplasmic tail domains of gH in both processes, and they suggest that a conserved glycine residue in the membrane-spanning sequence is crucial for efficient fusion.     

Cross Talk among the Glycoproteins Involved in Herpes Simplex Virus Entry and Fusion: the Interaction between gB and gH/gL Does Not Necessarily Require gD

The gD, gB, and gH/gL glycoprotein quartet constitutes the basic apparatus for herpes simplex virus (HSV) entry into the cell and fusion. gD serves as a receptor binding glycoprotein and trigger of fusion. The conserved gB and gH/gL execute fusion. Central to understanding HSV entry/fusion has become the dissection of how the four glycoproteins engage in cross talk. While the independent interactions of gD with gB and gD with gH/gL have been documented, less is known of the interaction of gB with gH/gL. So far, this interaction has been detected only in the presence of gD by means of a split green fluorescent protein complementation assay. Here, we show that gB interacts with gH/gL in the absence of gD. The gB-gH/gL complex was best detected with a form of gB in which the endocytosis and phosphorylation motif have been deleted; this form of gB persists in the membranes of the exocytic pathway and is not endocytosed. The gB-gH/gL interaction was detected both in whole transfected cells by means of a split yellow fluorescent protein complementation assay and, biochemically, by a pull-down assay. Results with a panel of chimeric forms of gB, in which portions of the glycoprotein bracketed by consecutive cysteines were replaced with the corresponding portions from human herpesvirus 8 gB, favor the view that gB carries multiple sites for interaction with gH/gL, and one of these sites is located in the pleckstrin-like domain 1 carrying the bipartite fusion loop.Entry of herpes simplex virus (HSV) into the cell requires a multipartite apparatus made of a quartet of viral glycoproteins, gD, gB, and the heterodimer gH/gL, and a multistep process that culminates in the fusion of the virion envelope with cell membranes (5, 6, 10, 25, 36, 41). gD serves as the receptor-binding glycoprotein, able to interact with alternative receptors, nectin1, herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM) and, in some cells, modified heparan sulfate (9, 13, 30, 39). It can also be engineered to accept heterologous ligands able to interact with selected receptors present on tumor cells and thus represents a tool to redirect HSV tropism (21, 28, 29, 42). The heterodimer gH/gL and gB execute fusion and constitute the conserved fusion apparatus across the Herpesviridae family. gB structure in the postfusion conformation shows a trimer with a central coiled coil (19). gH shows elements typical of type 1 fusion glycoproteins, in particular, helices able to interact with membranes, and two heptad repeats potentially able to form a coiled coil (12, 15-18). The discovery that a soluble form of gD enables entry of gD-null virions revealed that gD serves the additional function of triggering fusion and led to the view that the major roles of gD are to sense that virus has reached a receptor-positive cell and to signal to gB and gH/gL that fusion is to be executed (8). Biochemical and structural analyses showed that the C-terminal region of the gD ectodomain, containing the profusion domain required for fusion but not for receptor binding, can undergo major conformational changes (11, 24). Specifically, it binds the gD core and masks or hinders the receptor binding sites, conferring upon the molecule a closed, auto-inhibited conformation (24). Alternatively, it may unfold, conferring upon gD an open conformation. It was proposed that the C terminus of gD unfolds from gD core at receptor binding and recruits gH/gL and gB to a quaternary complex. A key feature of the model was that complexes among the glycoprotein quartet were not preformed, but, rather, they would assemble at the onset of or at fusion execution.Central to understanding HSV entry/fusion has become the dissection of the interactions that occur among the members of the glycoprotein quartet and their significance to the process. A first evidence of a gD-gH/gL interaction was provided in coimmunoprecipitation studies (35). Interactions between gD and gH/gL and between gD and gB were subsequently detected by split green fluorescence protein (GFP) complementation assays, implying that gD can recruit gB and gH/gL independently of one another, a result that argues against a stepwise recruitment of the glycoproteins to gD. In agreement with the proposed model, the interaction between gH/gL and gB was detected in the presence of transfected or soluble gD (1, 2). However, further studies highlighted levels of complexity not foreseen in the initial model. Thus, pull-down analyses showed that the interaction sites in gD with gB and with gH/gL lie in part outside the C-terminal portion of the gD ectodomain, that resting virions contain small amounts of gD in complex with gB and with gH/gL prior to encountering cells, and that de novo gD-gB complexes were not detected at virus entry into the cell (14).A major objective of current studies was to analyze the interaction of gB with gH/gL. We documented the interaction by two independent assays, i.e., by a complementation assay of split yellow fluorescent protein Venus (herein indicated as YFP) (31) in whole cells and, biochemically, by a pull-down assay. The latter was applied recently in our laboratory and is based on the ability of One-Strep-tagged proteins (e.g., gH) to specifically absorb to Strep-Tactin resin and thus retain any protein in complex (14). To preliminarily search for gB regions critical for the interaction with gH/gL, we engineered chimeric forms of HSV-1 and human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) gB in which the cysteines were preserved. While none of the chimeras was completely defective in the interaction, the interactions in the chimeras carrying substitutions in the pleckstrin-like domain 1—the domain that carries the bipartite fusion loops—were hampered. Altogether, the results underscore the ability of gB to interact with gH/gL in the absence of gD and favor the view that sites in gB for interaction with gH/gL involve multiple contacts, one of which is located in the domain that carries the fusion loops.     

Comparative Analysis of gO Isoforms Reveals that Strains of Human Cytomegalovirus Differ in the Ratio of gH/gL/gO and gH/gL/UL128-131 in the Virion Envelope

Herpesvirus glycoprotein complex gH/gL provides a core entry function through interactions with the fusion protein gB and can also influence tropism through receptor interactions. The Epstein-Barr virus gH/gL and gH/gL/gp42 serve both functions for entry into epithelial and B cells, respectively. Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) gH/gL can be bound by the UL128-131 proteins or gO. The phenotypes of gO and UL128-131 mutants suggest that gO-gH/gL interactions are necessary for the core entry function on all cell types, whereas the binding of UL128-131 to gH/gL likely relates to a distinct receptor-binding function for entry into some specific cell types (e.g., epithelial) but not others (e.g., fibroblasts and neurons). There are at least eight isoforms of gO that differ by 10 to 30% of amino acids, and previous analysis of two HCMV strains suggested that some isoforms of gO function like chaperones, disassociating during assembly to leave unbound gH/gL in the virion envelope, while others remain bound to gH/gL. For the current report, we analyzed the gH/gL complexes present in the virion envelope of several HCMV strains, each of which encodes a distinct gO isoform. Results indicate that all strains of HCMV contain stable gH/gL/gO trimers and gH/gL/UL128-131 pentamers and little, if any, unbound gH/gL. TR, TB40/e, AD169, and PH virions contained vastly more gH/gL/gO than gH/gL/UL128-131, whereas Merlin virions contained mostly gH/gL/UL128-131, despite abundant unbound gO remaining in the infected cells. Suppression of UL128-131 expression during Merlin replication dramatically shifted the ratio toward gH/gL/gO. These data suggest that Merlin gO is less efficient than other gO isoforms at competing with UL128-131 for binding to gH/gL. Thus, gO diversity may influence the pathogenesis of HCMV through effects on the assembly of the core versus tropism gH/gL complexes.     

Reevaluating Herpes Simplex Virus Hemifusion

Membrane fusion induced by enveloped viruses proceeds through the actions of viral fusion proteins. Once activated, viral fusion proteins undergo large protein conformational changes to execute membrane fusion. Fusion is thought to proceed through a “hemifusion” intermediate in which the outer membrane leaflets of target and viral membranes mix (lipid mixing) prior to fusion pore formation, enlargement, and completion of fusion. Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) requires four glycoproteins—glycoprotein D (gD), glycoprotein B (gB), and a heterodimer of glycoprotein H and L (gH/gL)—to accomplish fusion. gD is primarily thought of as a receptor-binding protein and gB as a fusion protein. The role of gH/gL in fusion has remained enigmatic. Despite experimental evidence that gH/gL may be a fusion protein capable of inducing hemifusion in the absence of gB, the recently solved crystal structure of HSV-2 gH/gL has no structural homology to any known viral fusion protein. We found that in our hands, all HSV entry proteins—gD, gB, and gH/gL—were required to observe lipid mixing in both cell-cell- and virus-cell-based hemifusion assays. To verify that our hemifusion assay was capable of detecting hemifusion, we used glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-linked hemagglutinin (HA), a variant of the influenza virus fusion protein, HA, known to stall the fusion process before productive fusion pores are formed. Additionally, we found that a mutant carrying an insertion within the short gH cytoplasmic tail, 824L gH, is incapable of executing hemifusion despite normal cell surface expression. Collectively, our findings suggest that HSV gH/gL may not function as a fusion protein and that all HSV entry glycoproteins are required for both hemifusion and fusion. The previously described gH 824L mutation blocks gH/gL function prior to HSV-induced lipid mixing.Membrane fusion is an essential step during the entry process of enveloped viruses, such as herpes simplex virus (HSV), into target cells. The general pathway by which enveloped viruses fuse with target membranes through the action of fusion proteins is fairly well understood. Viral fusion proteins use the free energy liberated during their own protein conformational changes to draw the two membranes—viral and target—together. Fusion is thought to proceed through a “hemifusion” intermediate, in which the proximal leaflets of the two bilayers have merged but a viral pore has not yet formed and viral contents have not yet mixed with the cell cytoplasm (10, 38). Fusion proteins then drive the completion of fusion, which includes fusion pore formation, pore enlargement, and complete content mixing.HSV, an enveloped neurotropic virus, requires four glycoproteins—glycoprotein B (gB), glycoprotein D (gD), glycoprotein H (gH), and glycoprotein L (gL)—to execute fusion (9, 57, 60). gB, gD, and gH are membrane bound; gL is a soluble protein which complexes with gH to form a heterodimer (gH/gL). HSV-1 gH is not trafficked to the cell or virion surface in the absence of gL (32, 52). The requirement of four entry glycoproteins sets HSV apart from other enveloped viruses, most of which induce fusion through the activity of a single fusion protein. Although the specific mode of HSV entry is cell type dependent—fusion with neurons and Vero cells occurs at the plasma membrane at neutral pH; fusion with HeLa and CHO cells involves pH-dependent endocytosis, and fusion with C10 cells involves pH-independent endocytosis (42, 45)—all routes of entry require gD, gB, and gH/gL. Furthermore, although some discrepancies between virus-cell and cell-cell fusion have been observed (8, 44, 55, 58), both generally require the actions of gD, gB, and gH/gL.Much work has gone toward the understanding of how the required HSV entry glycoproteins work together to accomplish fusion, and many questions remain. After viral attachment, mediated by glycoprotein C and/or gB (54), the first step in HSV fusion is thought to be gD binding a host cell receptor (either herpesvirus entry mediator [HVEM], nectin-1, nectin-2, or heparan sulfate modified by specific 3-O-sulfotransferases) (56). The gD-receptor interaction induces a conformational change in gD (39) that is thought to trigger gD-gB and/or gD-gH/gL interactions that are required for the progression of fusion (1-4, 13, 18, 23, 49).gB and gH/gL are considered the core fusion machinery of most herpesviruses. The HSV-1 gB structure revealed surprising structural homology to the postfusion structures of two known viral fusion proteins (31, 35, 51). This structural homology indicates that despite not being sufficient for HSV fusion, gB is likely a fusion protein. Although the gB cytoplasmic tail (CT) is not included in the solved structure, it acts as a regulator of fusion, as CT truncations can cause either hyperfusion or fusion-null phenotypes (5, 17). The gB CT has been proposed to bind stably to lipid membranes and negatively regulate membrane fusion (12). Another proposed regulator of gB function is gH/gL. Despite conflicting accounts of whether gD and a gD receptor are required for the interaction of gH/gL and gB (1, 3, 4), a recent study indicates that gH/gL and gB interact prior to fusion and that gB may interact with target membranes prior to an interaction with gH/gL (2). The gB-gH/gL interaction seems to be required for the progression of fusion.Compared to the other required HSV entry glycoproteins, the role of gH/gL during fusion remains enigmatic. Mutational studies have revealed several regions of the gH ectodomain, transmembrane domain (TM), and CT that are required for its function (19, 25, 26, 30, 33). gH/gL of another herpesvirus, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), have been shown to bind integrins during epithelial cell fusion, and soluble forms of HSV gH/gL have been shown to bind cells and inhibit viral entry in vitro (24, 46). However, the role of gH/gL binding to target cells in regard to the fusion process remains to be determined.There are some lines of evidence that suggest that gH/gL is a fusion protein. The gH/gL complexes of VZV and CMV have been reported to independently execute some level of cell-cell fusion (14, 37). HSV-1 gH/gL has been reported to independently mediate membrane fusion during nuclear egress (15). In silico analyses and studies of synthetic HSV gH peptides have proposed that gH has fusogenic properties (20, 21, 25-28). Finally, of most importance to the work we report here, gH/gL has been shown to be sufficient for induction of hemifusion in the presence of gD and a gD receptor, further promoting the premise that gH/gL is a fusion protein (59). However, the recently solved crystal structure of HSV-2 gH/gL revealed a tight complex of gH/gL in a “boot-like” structure, which bears no structural homology to any known fusion proteins (11). The HSV-2 gH/gL structure and research demonstrating that gH/gL and gB interactions are critical to fusion (2) have together prompted a new model of HSV fusion in which gH/gL is required to either negatively or positively regulate the activity of gB through direct binding.We wanted to investigate the ability of a previously reported gH CT mutant, 824L, to execute hemifusion. 824L gH contains a five-residue insertion at gH residue 824, just C-terminal of the TM domain. 824L is expressed on cell surfaces and incorporated into virions at levels indistinguishable from those of wild-type gH by either cell-based ELISA or immunoblotting, yet it is nonfunctional (33). We relied on a fusion assay capable of detecting hemifusion, developed by Subramanian et al. (59), which we modified to include an additional control for hemifusion or nonenlarging pore formation, glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-linked hemagglutinin (GPI-HA). GPI-HA is a variant of the influenza virus fusion protein, HA, that is known to stall the fusion process before enlarging fusion pores are formed.We were surprised to find that in our hands, gD, a gD receptor, and gH/gL were insufficient for the induction of hemifusion or lipid mixing in both cell-based and virus-based fusion assays. We found that gD, gB, and gH/gL are all required to observe lipid mixing. Further, we found that gB, gD, gL, and 824L gH are insufficient for lipid mixing. Our findings support the emerging view, based on gH/gL structure, that the gH/gL complex does not function as a fusion protein and does not insert into target membranes to initiate the process of fusion through a hemifusion intermediate. Our findings also further demonstrate that mutations in the CT of gH can have a dramatic effect on the ability of gH/gL to function in fusion.