Establishing a control population to screen for the occurrence of nineteen unclassified variants in the BRCA1 gene by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography

Numerous missense mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are detected during clinical screening of breast and ovarian cancer patients. Because of the lack of a functional protein assay to determine the functional consequence of these mutations, patients are often frustrated by inconclusive results due to unclassified variants (UV). To determine whether a reported UV is also present in a control collective and therefore more likely be a rare polymorphism than a deleterious mutation, we collected a control population consisting of 95 females and 25 males aged over 60 years (mean 73 years) without a family history of BRCA associated cancers. The age of the control group is beyond the median onset of breast and ovarian cancer with a hereditary background. These controls were analysed for the presence of 19 known UVs in BRCA1 with the DHPLC technique. Only four of the 19 variants (R496H, R866C, S1040N and M1652I) were detected and can be considered polymorphims. However, no firm conclusion can be drawn about the functional relevance of the other 15 variants.     

Three novel BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in breast/ovarian cancer families in Croatia

BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes from 167 candidates (145 families) were scanned for mutations. We identified 14 pathogenic point mutations in 17 candidates, 9 in BRCA1 and 5 in BRCA2. Of those, 11 have been previously described and 3 were novel (c.5335C>T in BRCA1 and c.4139_4140dupTT and c.8175G>A in BRCA2). No large deletions or duplications involving BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were identified. No founder mutations were detected for the Croatian population. Croatia shares most of the mutations with neighboring Slovenia and also with Germany, Austria and Poland. Two common sequence variants in BRCA1, c.2077G>A and c.4956G>A, were found more frequently in mutation carriers compared to healthy controls. No difference in BRCA2 variants was detected between the groups. Haplotype inference showed no difference in haplotype distributions between deleterious mutation carriers and non-carriers in neither BRCA1 nor BRCA2. In silico analyses identified one BRCA1 sequence variant (c.4039A>G) and two BRCA2 variants (c.5986G>A and c.6884G>C) as harmful with high probability, and inconclusive results were obtained for our novel BRCA2 variant c.3864_3866delTAA. Combination of QMPSF and HRMA methods provides high detection rate and complete coverage of BRCA1/2 genes. Benefit of BRCA1/2 mutation testing is clear, since we detected mutations in young unaffected women, who will be closely monitored for breast and ovarian cancer.     

Characterization of common BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants

Many missense variants identified in BRCA1 and BRCA2, two genes responsible for the majority of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, are of unclear clinical significance. Characterizing the significance of such variants is important for medical management of patients in whom they are identified. The aim of this study was to characterize eight of the most common reported missense mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 occurring in patients tested for hereditary risk of breast and ovarian cancers. The prevalence of each variant in a control population, co-segregation of the variant with cancer within families, location of the variant within the gene, the nature of the amino acid substitution and conservation of the wild-type amino acid among species were considered. In a control population, the BRCA1 variants M1652I, R1347G, and S1512I, were each observed at a frequency of 4.08%, 2.04%, and 2.04%, respectively, and the BRCA2 variants A2951T, V2728I, and D1420Y, were seen at 1.02%, 0.68%, and 0.34%, respectively. Although the BRCA2 variants T598A and R2034C were not seen in this group of controls, other clinical and published observations indicate that these variants are not deleterious. Based on epidemiological and biological criteria, we therefore conclude that the BRCA1 missense mutations R1347G, S1512I and M1652I, and the BRCA2 missense mutations T598A, D1420Y, R2034C, V2728I, and A2951T, are not deleterious mutations.     

Immunolocalization of BRCA1 protein in tumor breast tissue: prescreening of BRCA1 mutation in Tunisian patients with hereditary breast cancer?

BRCA1 is a tumor suppressor gene which is inactivated by mutation in familial breast and ovarian cancers. Over 300 different disease causing germ-line mutations have been described; 60% are unique to an individual family. This diversity and the large size of the gene lead us to search for a prescreening method for BRCA1 mutations. Since BRCA1 is a nuclear protein in normal cells, but reported by some authors to be cytoplasmic in breast tumor cells of patients with BRCA1 mutation, we evaluated immunohistochemistry as a prescreening technique to identify BRCA1 mutations in patients with familial presentation of breast cancer. Using a monoclonal antibody against the carboxy-terminal region of BRCA1, we performed immunohistochemistry on 18 tumor samples from patients with hereditary breast cancer. Cytoplasmic staining of BRCA1 was observed in 10 cases. Of the 18 tumors, 12 (66%) showed either BRCA mutation or BRCA1 accumulation or both, indicating that BRCA1 function might be lost in breast tumor cells not only through mutation, but also via abnormal cytoplasmic location. The immunohistochemical test used in this study would not be efficient as a pre-screening method of deleterious mutations, but it appeared useful to investigate tumor physiology.     

Prevalence of<Emphasis Type="Italic"> BRCA1</Emphasis> and<Emphasis Type="Italic"> BRCA2</Emphasis> mutations among clinic-based African American families with breast cancer

To define the prevalence and relative contributions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among African American families with breast cancer, we analyzed 28 DNA samples from patients identified through two oncology clinics. The entire coding regions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 were screened by protein truncation test, heteroduplex analysis, or single-stranded conformation polymorphism followed by DNA sequencing of variant bands. Deleterious protein-truncating BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were identified in five patients or 18% of the entire cohort. Only 8% (1 of 13) of women with a family history of breast cancer, but no ovarian cancer, had mutations. The mutation rates were higher for women from families with a history of breast cancer and at least one ovarian cancer (three of six, 50%). One woman with a family history of undocumented cancers was also found to carry a deleterious mutation in BRCA2. The spectrum of mutations was unique in that one novel BRCA1 mutation (1625del5) and three novel BRCA2 mutations (1536del4, 6696delTC, and 7795delCT) were identified. No recurrent mutations were identified in this cohort, although one BRCA2 (2816insA) mutation had been previously reported. In addition, two BRCA1 and four BRCA2 missense mutations of unknown significance were identified, one of which was novel. Taken together with our previous report on recurrent mutations seen in unrelated families, we conclude that African Americans have a unique mutation spectrum in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, but recurrent mutations are likely to be more widely dispersed and therefore not readily identifiable in this population.     

BRCA1 sequence variations in 160 individuals referred to a breast/ovarian family cancer clinic. Institut Curie Breast Cancer Group.

An account of familial aggregation in breast/ovarian cancer has become possible with the identification of BRCA1 germ-line mutations. We evaluated, for 249 individuals registered with the Institut Curie in Paris, the prior probability that an individual carried a mutation that predisposes to these diseases. We chose 160 women for BRCA1 analysis: 103 with a family history of breast cancer and 57 with a family history of breast-ovarian cancer. To detect small mutations, we generated and analyzed 35 overlapping genomic PCR products that cover the coding portion of the gene, by using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Thirty-eight truncating mutations (32 frameshifts, 4 nonsense mutations, and 2 splice variants) were observed in 15% of women with a family history of breast cancer only and in 40% of those with a history of breast-ovarian cancer. Twelve of 25 distinct truncating mutations identified were novel and unique. Most BRCA1 mutations that had been reported more than five times in the Breast Cancer Information Core were present in our series. One mutation (5149del4) observed in two apparently unrelated families most likely originates from a common ancestor. The position of truncating mutations did not significantly affect the ratio of the risk of breast cancer to that of ovarian cancer. In addition, 15 DNA variants (14 missense mutations and 1 neutral mutation) were identified, 9 of which were novel. Indirect evidence suggests that seven of these mutations are deleterious.     

Application of multiplex PCR with histopathologic features for detection of familial breast cancer in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded histologic specimens

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among females in the world. Age and familial history are the major risk factors for the development of this disease in Iran. Mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are associated with a greatly increased risk for development of familial breast cancer. Frequency of BRCA mutations was identified in familial breast cancers (FBC) and non-familial breast cancers (NFBC) by molecular genetics, morphological and Immunohistochemical methods. Thirty forth formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast tissue tumors were analyzed from 16 patients with FBC and 18 patients with NFBC. Three 5382insC mutations detected by multiplex PCR in 16 familial breast cancers. Immunohistochemical method was used to detect estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterona receptor (PR) and TP53. Comparison of ER, PR and TP53 exhibited high difference (P < 0.0001) in familial breast cancers and non-familial breast cancers. Our results demonstrated that 5382insC mutation, ER, PR, TP53, mitotic activity, polymorphism, necrosis and tubules can serve as the major risk factors for the development of FBC.     

Variants in CHEK2 other than 1100delC do not make a major contribution to breast cancer susceptibility

We recently reported that a sequence variant in the cell-cycle-checkpoint kinase CHEK2 (CHEK2 1100delC) is a low-penetrance breast cancer-susceptibility allele in noncarriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. To investigate whether other CHEK2 variants confer susceptibility to breast cancer, we screened the full CHEK2 coding sequence in BRCA1/2-negative breast cancer cases from 89 pedigrees with three or more cases of breast cancer. We identified one novel germline variant, R117G, in two separate families. To evaluate the possible association of R117G and two germline variants reported elsewhere, R145W and I157T with breast cancer, we screened 737 BRCA1/2-negative familial breast cancer cases from 605 families, 459 BRCA1/2-positive cases from 335 families, and 723 controls from the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and North America. All three variants were rare in all groups, and none occurred at significantly elevated frequency in familial breast cancer cases compared with controls. These results indicate that 1100delC may be the only CHEK2 allele that makes an appreciable contribution to breast cancer susceptibility.     

Hereditary breast cancer in Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) populations: identification of novel, recurrent and founder BRCA1 mutations in the Tunisian population

Germ-line mutations in BRCA1 breast cancer susceptibility gene account for a large proportion of hereditary breast cancer families and show considerable ethnic and geographical variations. The contribution of BRCA1 mutations to hereditary breast cancer has not yet been thoroughly investigated in Middle Eastern and North African populations. In this study, 16 Tunisian high-risk breast cancer families were screened for germline mutations in the entire BRCA1 coding region and exon?Cintron boundaries using direct sequencing. Six families were found to carry BRCA1 mutations with a prevalence of 37.5%. Four different deleterious mutations were detected. Three truncating mutations were previously described: c.798_799delTT (916 delTT), c.3331_3334delCAAG (3450 delCAAG), c.5266dupC (5382 insC) and one splice site mutation which seems to be specific to the Tunisian population: c.212?+?2insG (IVS5?+?2insG). We also identified 15 variants of unknown clinical significance. The c.798_799delTT mutation occurred at an 18% frequency and was shared by three apparently unrelated families. Analyzing five microsatellite markers in and flanking the BRCA1 locus showed a common haplotype associated with this mutation. This suggests that the c.798_799delTT mutation is a Tunisian founder mutation. Our findings indicate that the Tunisian population has a spectrum of prevalent BRCA1 mutations, some of which appear as recurrent and founding mutations.     

Prevalence of BRCA1 Mutations in Familial and Sporadic Greek Ovarian Cancer Cases

Germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes contribute to approximately 18% of hereditary ovarian cancers conferring an estimated lifetime risk from 15% to 50%. A variable incidence of mutations has been reported for these genes in ovarian cancer cases from different populations. In Greece, six mutations in BRCA1 account for 63% of all mutations detected in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of BRCA1 mutations in a Greek cohort of 106 familial ovarian cancer patients that had strong family history or metachronous breast cancer and 592 sporadic ovarian cancer cases. All 698 patients were screened for the six recurrent Greek mutations (including founder mutations c.5266dupC, p.G1738R and the three large deletions of exon 20, exons 23–24 and exon 24). In familial cases, the BRCA1 gene was consequently screened for exons 5, 11, 12, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24. A deleterious BRCA1 mutation was found in 43/106 (40.6%) of familial cancer cases and in 27/592 (4.6%) of sporadic cases. The variant of unknown clinical significance p.V1833M was identified in 9/698 patients (1.3%). The majority of BRCA1 carriers (71.2%) presented a high-grade serous phenotype. Identifying a mutation in the BRCA1 gene among breast and/or ovarian cancer families is important, as it enables carriers to take preventive measures. All ovarian cancer patients with a serous phenotype should be considered for genetic testing. Further studies are warranted to determine the prevalence of mutations in the rest of the BRCA1 gene, in the BRCA2 gene, and other novel predisposing genes for breast and ovarian cancer.     

Mutations in RECQL Gene Are Associated with Predisposition to Breast Cancer

The genetic cause for approximately 80% of familial breast cancer patients is unknown. Here, by sequencing the entire exomes of nine early-onset familial breast cancer patients without BRCA1/2 mutations (diagnosed with breast cancer at or before the age of 35) we found that two index cases carried a potentially deleterious mutation in the RECQL gene (RecQ helicase-like; chr12p12). Recent studies suggested that RECQL is involved in DNA double-strand break repair and it plays an important role in the maintenance of genomic stability. Therefore, we further screened the RECQL gene in an additional 439 unrelated familial breast cancer patients. In total, we found three nonsense mutations leading to a truncated protein of RECQL (p.L128X, p.W172X, and p.Q266X), one mutation affecting mRNA splicing (c.395-2A>G), and five missense mutations disrupting the helicase activity of RECQL (p.A195S, p.R215Q, p.R455C, p.M458K, and p.T562I), as evaluated through an in vitro helicase assay. Taken together, 9 out of 448 BRCA-negative familial breast cancer patients carried a pathogenic mutation of the RECQL gene compared with one of the 1,588 controls (P = 9.14×10^-6). Our findings suggest that RECQL is a potential breast cancer susceptibility gene and that mutations in this gene contribute to familial breast cancer development.     

RAD51C germline mutations in breast and ovarian cancer cases from high-risk families

BRCA1 and BRCA2 are the most well-known breast cancer susceptibility genes. Additional genes involved in DNA repair have been identified as predisposing to breast cancer. One such gene, RAD51C, is essential for homologous recombination repair. Several likely pathogenic RAD51C mutations have been identified in BRCA1- and BRCA2-negative breast and ovarian cancer families. We performed complete sequencing of RAD51C in germline DNA of 286 female breast and/or ovarian cancer cases with a family history of breast and ovarian cancers, who had previously tested negative for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. We screened 133 breast cancer cases, 119 ovarian cancer cases, and 34 with both breast and ovarian cancers. Fifteen DNA sequence variants were identified; including four intronic, one 5' UTR, one promoter, three synonymous, and six non-synonymous variants. None were truncating. The in-silico SIFT and Polyphen programs were used to predict possible pathogenicity of the six non-synonomous variants based on sequence conservation. G153D and T287A were predicted to be likely pathogenic. Two additional variants, A126T and R214C alter amino acids in important domains of the protein such that they could be pathogenic. Two-hybrid screening and immunoblot analyses were performed to assess the functionality of these four non-synonomous variants in yeast. The RAD51C-G153D protein displayed no detectable interaction with either XRCC3 or RAD51B, and RAD51C-R214C displayed significantly decreased interaction with both XRCC3 and RAD51B (p<0.001). Immunoblots of RAD51C-Gal4 activation domain fusion peptides showed protein levels of RAD51C-G153D and RAD51C-R214C that were 50% and 60% of the wild-type, respectively. Based on these data, the RAD51C-G153D variant is likely to be pathogenic, while the RAD51C- R214C variant is hypomorphic of uncertain pathogenicity. These results provide further support that RAD51C is a rare breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene.     

Two percent of men with early-onset prostate cancer harbor germline mutations in the BRCA2 gene

Studies of families with breast cancer have indicated that male carriers of BRCA2 mutations are at increased risk of prostate cancer, particularly at an early age. To evaluate the contribution of BRCA2 mutations to early-onset prostate cancer, we screened the complete coding sequence of BRCA2 for germline mutations, in 263 men with diagnoses of prostate cancer who were 相似文献   

Inherited<Emphasis Type="Italic"> BRCA2</Emphasis> mutations in African Americans with breast and/or ovarian cancer: a study of familial and early onset cases

In order to identify the spectrum of BRCA2 mutations in African Americans, breast or ovarian cancer patients from 74 independent families at elevated risk of germline mutations were investigated. The entire coding regions and flanking introns of BRCA2 were screened for germline mutations by single-stranded conformation polymorphism, protein truncation test, or denaturing high performance liquid chromatography followed by DNA sequencing. Eight distinct protein-truncating mutations were detected in six female patients (average age of onset of breast cancer: 37.6 years) and two male patients, but not in 163 unrelated disease-free controls. Two (1993delAA, 8643delAT) of the eight pathogenic mutations observed in African Americans have not been previously described. The other six pathogenic mutations (1882delT, 1991delATAA, 2001delTTAT, 2816insA, 4075delGT, 4088delA) have been detected in Caucasians; only the 2816insA mutation has been reported previously in African Americans. There were no significant differences in the frequency of deleterious BRCA2 mutations in African Americans compared with Caucasians. Six rare variations, not previously reported, were identified in five breast cancer patients but not in 163 disease-free control subjects. Of 11 different polymorphisms identified in high-risk African-American breast cancer patients, four may be unique to African Americans. An intron 10 polymorphism observed in patients was not detected in 163 disease-free African-American control subjects; this difference is statistically significant. Since many different pathogenic mutations and variants of unknown significance are observed in African Americans, BRCA2 genetic testing in high-risk African-American families must include the entire coding and flanking non-coding regions of the gene.     

BRCA1 mutations and polymorphisms in a hospital-based consecutive series of breast cancer patients from Apulia, Italy

INTRODUCTION: Hereditary breast cancer has been partly attributed to germline mutations in the BRCA1 gene that are deleterious for BRCA1 protein activity. This paper analyzes the incidence and characteristics of detectable BRCA1 mutations and polymorphisms in a hospital-based consecutive series of breast cancer patients from southern Italy to investigate the incidence and the association of these molecular alterations with breast cancer biology and family history. METHODS: One hundred cases with familial characteristics were selected from a consecutive series of 511 patients with a first diagnosis of breast cancer. DNA from peripheral blood was screened for whole BRCA1 gene mutations utilizing dHPLC as a pre-screening analysis and automatic DNA sequencing for the identification of specific alterations. RESULTS: In the overall series of 511 patients, 100 had a family history of breast cancer and were investigated for BRCA1 mutations. Two types of BRCA1 mutations were identified, 5382insC in six cases and 4566delA in one case. The 5382insC mutation was present in two out of six cases with ovarian cancer while 4566delA in one case of male cancer. The most frequent missense polymorphisms were E1038G, P871L, K1183R in exon 11, S1613G, M1652I in exon 16 and D1778G in exon 22. Confirming what found in previous studies, patients in whom pathological BRCA1 mutations were detected had early-onset breast cancer (p=0.05), positive nodal status (p=0.05), lower ER (p=0.02) and PgR (p=0.01) content. Interestingly, the K1183R polymorphism and, less strongly, S1613G polymorphism were associated to mutational risk (K1183R: OR 0.1 p=0.03; S1613G: OR 2.7 p=0.08). CONCLUSION: Mutations in the BRCA1 gene are frequent also in our consecutive series of patients from southern Italy. An association between two detected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and BRCA1 mutational risk was ascertained. Finally, we confirm the fact that peculiar clinical-pathological features seem to characterize patients with a family history of breast cancer and BRCA1 alterations.     

Hereditary breast cancer; Genetic penetrance and current status with BRCA

The most important cause of developing hereditary breast cancer is germline mutations occurring in breast cancer (BCs) susceptibility genes, for example, BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, CHEK2, PTEN, ATM, and PPM1D. Many BC susceptibility genes can be grouped into two classes, high- and low-penetrance genes, each of which interact with multiple genes and environmental factors. However, the penetrance of genes can also be represented by a spectrum, which ranges between high and low. Two of the most common susceptibility genes are BRCA1 and BRCA2, which perform vital cellular functions for repair of homologous DNA. Loss of heterozygosity accompanied by hereditary mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 increases chromosomal instability and the likelihood of cancer, as well as playing a key role in stimulating malignant transformation. With regard to pathological features, familial breast cancers caused by BRCA1 mutations usually differ from those caused by BRCA2 mutations and nonfamilial BCs. It is essential to acquire an understanding of these pathological features along with the genetic history of the patient to offer an individualized treatment. Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are the main genetic and inherited factors for breast and ovarian cancer. In fact, these mutations are very important in developing early onset and increasing the risk of familial breast and ovarian cancer and responsible for 90% of hereditary BC cases. Therefore, according to the conducted studies, screening of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes is recommended as an important marker for early detection of all patients with breast or ovarian cancer risk with family history of the disease. In this review, we summarize the role of hereditary genes, mainly BRCA1 and BRCA2, in BC.     

The Contribution of Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations to Familial Ovarian Cancer: No Evidence for Other Ovarian Cancer–Susceptibility Genes

To establish the contribution of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations to familial ovarian cancer, we have analyzed both genes in DNA samples obtained from an affected individual in each of 112 families containing at least two cases of epithelial ovarian cancer. Germline mutations were found in 43% of the families; BRCA1 mutations were approximately four times more common than BRCA2 mutations. The extent of family history of ovarian and breast cancers was strongly predictive of BRCA1-mutation status. Segregation analysis suggests that a combination of chance clustering of sporadic cases and insensitivity of mutation detection may account for the remaining families; however, the contribution of other genes cannot be excluded. We discuss the implications for genetic testing and clinical management of familial ovarian cancer arising from the data presented in these studies.     

BRCA2 mutations and triple-negative breast cancer

Recently, BRCA1 germline mutations were found in a high proportion (14-34%) of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). BRCA2 was either not analyzed or showed much lower mutation frequencies. Therefore, we screened a group of TNBC patients (n = 30) of white European descent for mutations in BRCA2 as well as in BRCA1. Cases were unselected for age of disease-onset (median age at breast cancer diagnosis was 58 years, ranging from 37 to 74 years), family history of cancer and BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status. Half of the patients (15/30) showed a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer. A high frequency of deleterious germline mutations was observed in BRCA2 (5/30; 16.7%), and only one case showed a BRCA1 mutation (3.3%). Although the study group was small, these results point to BRCA2 mutations being important in TNBC.     

Genetic variants associated with breast cancer risk for Ashkenazi Jewish women with strong family histories but no identifiable BRCA1/2 mutation

The ability to establish genetic risk models is critical for early identification and optimal treatment of breast cancer. For such a model to gain clinical utility, more variants must be identified beyond those discovered in previous genome-wide association studies (GWAS). This is especially true for women at high risk because of family history, but without BRCA1/2 mutations. This study incorporates three datasets in a GWAS analysis of women with Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) homogeneous ancestry. Two independent discovery cohorts comprised 239 and 238 AJ women with invasive breast cancer or preinvasive ductal carcinoma in situ and strong family histories of breast cancer, but lacking the three BRCA1/2 founder mutations, along with 294 and 230 AJ controls, respectively. An independent, third cohort of 203 AJ cases with familial breast cancer history and 263 healthy controls of AJ women was used for validation. A total of 19 SNPs were identified as associated with familial breast cancer risk in AJ women. Among these SNPs, 13 were identified from a panel of 109 discovery SNPs, including an FGFR2 haplotype. In addition, six previously identified breast cancer GWAS SNPs were confirmed in this population. Seven of the 19 markers were significant in a multivariate predictive model of familial breast cancer in AJ women, three novel SNPs [rs17663555(5q13.2), rs566164(6q21), and rs11075884(16q22.2)], the FGFR2 haplotype, and three previously published SNPs [rs13387042(2q35), rs2046210(ESR1), and rs3112612(TOX3)], yielding moderate predictive power with an area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC (receiver-operator characteristic curve) of 0.74. Population-specific genetic variants in addition to variants shared with populations of European ancestry may improve breast cancer risk prediction among AJ women from high-risk families without founder BRCA1/2 mutations.