The σE stress response is required for stress‐induced mutation and amplification in Escherichia coli

Pathways of mutagenesis are induced in microbes under adverse conditions controlled by stress responses. Control of mutagenesis by stress responses may accelerate evolution specifically when cells are maladapted to their environments, i.e. are stressed. Stress‐induced mutagenesis in the Escherichia coli Lac assay occurs either by ‘point’ mutation or gene amplification. Point mutagenesis is associated with DNA double‐strand‐break (DSB) repair and requires DinB error‐prone DNA polymerase and the SOS DNA‐damage‐ and RpoS general‐stress responses. We report that the RpoE envelope‐protein‐stress response is also required. In a screen for mutagenesis‐defective mutants, we isolated a transposon insertion in the rpoE P2 promoter. The insertion prevents rpoE induction during stress, but leaves constitutive expression intact, and allows cell viability. rpoE insertion and suppressed null mutants display reduced point mutagenesis and maintenance of amplified DNA. Furthermore, σ^E acts independently of stress responses previously implicated: SOS/DinB and RpoS, and of σ³², which was postulated to affect mutagenesis. I‐SceI‐induced DSBs alleviated much of the rpoE phenotype, implying that σ^E promoted DSB formation. Thus, a third stress response and stress input regulate DSB‐repair‐associated stress‐induced mutagenesis. This provides the first report of mutagenesis promoted by σ^E, and implies that extracytoplasmic stressors may affect genome integrity and, potentially, the ability to evolve.     

Recombinase and translesion DNA polymerase decrease the speed of replication fork progression during the DNA damage response in Escherichia coli cells

The SOS response is a DNA damage response pathway that serves as a general safeguard of genome integrity in bacteria. Extensive studies of the SOS response in Escherichia coli have contributed to establishing the key concepts of cellular responses to DNA damage. However, how the SOS response impacts on the dynamics of DNA replication fork movement remains unknown. We found that inducing the SOS response decreases the mean speed of individual replication forks by 30–50% in E. coli cells, leading to a 20–30% reduction in overall DNA synthesis. dinB and recA belong to a group of genes that are upregulated during the SOS response, and encode the highly conserved proteins DinB (also known as DNA polymerase IV) and RecA, which, respectively, specializes in translesion DNA synthesis and functions as the central recombination protein. Both genes were independently responsible for the SOS-dependent slowdown of replication fork progression. Furthermore, fork speed was reduced when each gene was ectopically expressed in SOS-uninduced cells to the levels at which they are expressed in SOS-induced cells. These results clearly indicate that the increased expression of dinB and recA performs a novel role in restraining the progression of an unperturbed replication fork during the SOS response.     

Selection of dinB Alleles Suppressing Survival Loss upon dinB Overexpression in Escherichia coli

Escherichia coli strains overproducing DinB undergo survival loss; however, the mechanisms regulating this phenotype are poorly understood. Here we report a genetic selection revealing DinB residues essential to effect this loss-of-survival phenotype. The selection uses strains carrying both an antimutator allele of DNA polymerase III (Pol III) α-subunit (dnaE915) and either chromosomal or plasmid-borne dinB alleles. We hypothesized that dnaE915 cells would respond to DinB overproduction differently from dnaE⁺ cells because the dnaE915 allele is known to have an altered genetic interaction with dinB⁺ compared to its interaction with dnaE⁺. Notably, we observe a loss-of-survival phenotype in dnaE915 strains with either a chromosomal catalytically inactive dinB(D103N) allele or a low-copy-number plasmid-borne dinB⁺ upon DNA damage treatment. Furthermore, we find that the loss-of-survival phenotype occurs independently of DNA damage treatment in a dnaE915 strain expressing the catalytically inactive dinB(D103N) allele from a low-copy-number plasmid. The selective pressure imposed resulted in suppressor mutations that eliminated growth defects. The dinB intragenic mutations examined were either base pair substitutions or those that we inferred to be loss of function (i.e., deletions and insertions). Further analyses of selected novel dinB alleles, generated by single-base-pair substitutions in the dnaE915 strain, indicated that these no longer effect loss of survival upon overproduction in dnaE⁺ strains. These mutations are mapped to specific areas of DinB; this permits us to gain insights into the mechanisms underlying the DinB-mediated overproduction loss-of-survival phenotype.     

Roles of E. coli double-strand-break-repair proteins in stress-induced mutation

Special mechanisms of mutation are induced during growth-limiting stress and can generate adaptive mutations that permit growth. These mechanisms may provide improved models for mutagenesis in antibiotic resistance, evolution of pathogens, cancer progression and chemotherapy resistance. Stress-induced reversion of an Escherichia coli episomal lac frameshift allele specifically requires DNA double-strand-break-repair (DSBR) proteins, the SOS DNA-damage response and its error-prone DNA polymerase, DinB. We distinguished two possible roles for the DSBR proteins. Each might act solely upstream of SOS, to create single-strand DNA that induces SOS. This could upregulate DinB and enhance mutation globally. Or any or all of them might function other than or in addition to SOS promotion, for example, directly in error-prone DSBR. We report that in cells with SOS genes derepressed constitutively, RecA, RuvA, RuvB, RuvC, RecF, and TraI remain required for stress-induced mutation, demonstrating that these proteins act other than via SOS induction. RecA and TraI also act by promoting SOS. These and additional results with hyper-mutating recD and recG mutants support roles for these proteins via error-prone DSBR. Such mechanisms could localize stress-induced mutagenesis to small genomic regions, a potentially important strategy for adaptive evolution, both for reducing additional deleterious mutations in rare adaptive mutants and for concerted evolution of genes.     

A Single Residue Unique to DinB-Like Proteins Limits Formation of the Polymerase IV Multiprotein Complex in Escherichia coli

The activity of DinB is governed by the formation of a multiprotein complex (MPC) with RecA and UmuD. We identified two highly conserved surface residues in DinB, cysteine 66 (C66) and proline 67 (P67). Mapping on the DinB tertiary structure suggests these are noncatalytic, and multiple-sequence alignments indicate that they are unique among DinB-like proteins. To investigate the role of the C66-containing surface in MPC formation, we constructed the dinB(C66A) derivative. We found that DinB(C66A) copurifies with its interacting partners, RecA and UmuD, to a greater extent than DinB. Notably, copurification of RecA with DinB is somewhat enhanced in the absence of UmuD and is further increased for DinB(C66A). In vitro pulldown assays also indicate that DinB(C66A) binds RecA and UmuD better than DinB. We note that the increased affinity of DinB(C66A) for UmuD is RecA dependent. Thus, the C66-containing binding surface appears to be critical to modulate interaction with UmuD, and particularly with RecA. Expression of dinB(C66A) from the chromosome resulted in detectable differences in dinB-dependent lesion bypass fidelity and homologous recombination. Study of this DinB derivative has revealed a key surface on DinB, which appears to modulate the strength of MPC binding, and has suggested a binding order of RecA and UmuD to DinB. These findings will ultimately permit the manipulation of these enzymes to deter bacterial antibiotic resistance acquisition and to gain insights into cancer development in humans.     

Induction of only one SOS operon,umuDC, is required for SOS mutagenesis in Escherichia coli

The actions of UmuDC and RecA proteins, respectively in SOS mutagenesis are studied here with the following experimental strategy. We used lexAl (Ind^?) bacteria to maintain all SOS proteins at their basal concentrations and then selectively increased the concentration of either UmuDC or RecA protein. For this purpose, we isolated operator-constitutive mutations o ^c in the umuDC and umuD'C operons and also used the o ₉₈ ^c -recA mutation. The o ₁ ^c -umuDC mutation prevents LexA repressor from binding to the operator and improves the Pribnow box consensus sequence. As a result, 5000 UmuD and 500 UmuC molecules per cell were produced in lexAl bacteria. This concentration is sufficient to restore SOS mutagenesis. The level of RecA protein present in the repressed state promoted full UmuD cleavage. Overproduction of RecA alone did not promote SOS mutagenesis. Increasing the level of RecA in the presence of high concentrations of UmuDC proteins has no further effect on SOS mutgenesis. We conclude that, after DNA damage, umuDC is the only SOS operon that must be induced in Escherichia coli to promote SOS mutagenesis.     

Induction of only one SOS operon, umuDC, is required for SOS mutagenesis in Escherichia coli

The actions of UmuDC and RecA proteins, respectively in SOS mutagenesis are studied here with the following experimental strategy. We used lexAl (Ind^–) bacteria to maintain all SOS proteins at their basal concentrations and then selectively increased the concentration of either UmuDC or RecA protein. For this purpose, we isolated operator-constitutive mutations o ^c in the umuDC and umuD'C operons and also used the o ₉₈ ^c -recA mutation. The o ₁ ^c -umuDC mutation prevents LexA repressor from binding to the operator and improves the Pribnow box consensus sequence. As a result, 5000 UmuD and 500 UmuC molecules per cell were produced in lexAl bacteria. This concentration is sufficient to restore SOS mutagenesis. The level of RecA protein present in the repressed state promoted full UmuD cleavage. Overproduction of RecA alone did not promote SOS mutagenesis. Increasing the level of RecA in the presence of high concentrations of UmuDC proteins has no further effect on SOS mutgenesis. We conclude that, after DNA damage, umuDC is the only SOS operon that must be induced in Escherichia coli to promote SOS mutagenesis.     

An SOS-regulated operon involved in damage-inducible mutagenesis in Caulobacter crescentus

DNA polymerases of the Y-family, such as Escherichia coli UmuC and DinB, are specialized enzymes induced by the SOS response, which bypass lesions allowing the continuation of DNA replication. umuDC orthologs are absent in Caulobacter crescentus and other bacteria, raising the question about the existence of SOS mutagenesis in these organisms. Here, we report that the C.crescentus dinB ortholog is not involved in damage-induced mutagenesis. However, an operon composed of two hypothetical genes and dnaE2, encoding a second copy of the catalytic subunit of Pol III, is damage inducible in a recA-dependent manner, and is responsible for most ultraviolet (UV) and mitomycin C-induced mutations in C.crescentus. The results demonstrate that the three genes are required for the error-prone processing of DNA lesions. The two hypothetical genes were named imuA and imuB, after inducible mutagenesis. ImuB is similar to proteins of the Y-family of polymerases, and possibly cooperates with DnaE2 in lesion bypass. The mutations arising as a consequence of the activity of the imuAB dnaE2 operon are rather unusual for UV irradiation, including G:C to C:G transversions.     

Single-strand-specific exonucleases prevent frameshift mutagenesis by suppressing SOS induction and the action of DinB/DNA polymerase IV in growing cells

Escherichia coli strains carrying null alleles of genes encoding single-strand-specific exonucleases ExoI and ExoVII display elevated frameshift mutation rates but not base substitution mutation rates. We characterized increased spontaneous frameshift mutation in ExoI- ExoVII- cells and report that some of this effect requires RecA, an inducible SOS DNA damage response, and the low-fidelity, SOS-induced DNA polymerase DinB/PolIV, which makes frameshift mutations preferentially. We also find that SOS is induced in ExoI- ExoVII- cells. The data imply a role for the single-stranded exonucleases in guarding the genome against mutagenesis by removing excess single-stranded DNA that, if left, leads to SOS induction and PolIV-dependent mutagenesis. Previous results implicated PolIV in E. coli mutagenesis specifically during starvation or antibiotic stresses. Our data imply that PolIV can also promote mutation in growing cells under genome stress due to excess single-stranded DNA.     

环境胁迫诱导的细胞适应性突变

细胞具有普遍的突变和进化能力, 如病原菌的抗药性、工业菌株的适应性和人体细胞的癌变等, 但是细胞的适应性突变是如何产生的呢？通过非致死性突变分析模型的建立与应用, 产生了新的适应性进化观点, 即环境胁迫诱导细胞适应性突变。这种环境诱导的细胞突变过程涉及多方面的生理调控, 包括细胞内毒性物质(如氧活性物质)积累并造成DNA损伤、DNA错配修复的活性受到抑制、胞内RpoS反应和SOS反应被激活等。这些反应使胞内高保真的DNA复制状态转变为低保真的DNA修复状态, 提高胞内突变率和重组活性。此外, 基因转录影响基因组的不稳定, 容易产生DNA损伤, 并造成局部的高突变率, 即形成了转录偶联的DNA修复与突变为基础的适应性突变观点。文章围绕环境胁迫诱导细胞突变率增加和转录偶联的DNA修复与突变这两种适应性突变分子机制, 阐述其相关的研究进展, 以期更好地理解环境条件诱导细胞发生适应性突变的过程。     

The Origin of Mutants Under Selection: How Natural Selection Mimics Mutagenesis (Adaptive Mutation)

Selection detects mutants but does not cause mutations. Contrary to this dictum, Cairns and Foster plated a leaky lac mutant of Escherichia coli on lactose medium and saw revertant (Lac⁺) colonies accumulate with time above a nongrowing lawn. This result suggested that bacteria might mutagenize their own genome when growth is blocked. However, this conclusion is suspect in the light of recent evidence that revertant colonies are initiated by preexisting cells with multiple copies the conjugative F′lac plasmid, which carries the lac mutation. Some plated cells have multiple copies of the simple F′lac plasmid. This provides sufficient LacZ activity to support plasmid replication but not cell division. In nongrowing cells, repeated plasmid replication increases the likelihood of a reversion event. Reversion to lac⁺ triggers exponential cell growth leading to a stable Lac⁺ revertant colony. In 10% of these plated cells, the high-copy plasmid includes an internal tandem lac duplication, which provides even more LacZ activity—sufficient to support slow growth and formation of an unstable Lac⁺ colony. Cells with multiple copies of the F′lac plasmid have an increased mutation rate, because the plasmid encodes the error-prone (mutagenic) DNA polymerase, DinB. Without DinB, unstable and stable Lac⁺ revertant types form in equal numbers and both types arise with no mutagenesis. Amplification and selection are central to behavior of the Cairns–Foster system, whereas mutagenesis is a system-specific side effect or artifact caused by coamplification of dinB with lac. Study of this system has revealed several broadly applicable principles. In all populations, gene duplications are frequent stable genetic polymorphisms, common near-neutral mutant alleles can gain a positive phenotype when amplified under selection, and natural selection can operate without cell division when variability is generated by overreplication of local genome subregions.     

What limits the efficiency of double-strand break-dependent stress-induced mutation in Escherichia coli?

Stress-induced mutation is a collection of molecular mechanisms in bacterial, yeast and human cells that promote mutagenesis specifically when cells are maladapted to their environment, i.e. when they are stressed. Here, we review one molecular mechanism: double-strand break (DSB)-dependent stress-induced mutagenesis described in starving Escherichia coli. In it, the otherwise high-fidelity process of DSB repair by homologous recombination is switched to an error-prone mode under the control of the RpoS general stress response, which licenses the use of error-prone DNA polymerase, DinB, in DSB repair. This mechanism requires DSB repair proteins, RpoS, the SOS response and DinB. This pathway underlies half of spontaneous chromosomal frameshift and base substitution mutations in starving E. coli [Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:13659-13664], yet appeared less efficient in chromosomal than F' plasmid-borne genes. Here, we demonstrate and quantify DSB-dependent stress-induced reversion of a chromosomal lac allele with DSBs supplied by I-SceI double-strand endonuclease. I-SceI-induced reversion of this allele was previously studied in an F'. We compare the efficiencies of mutagenesis in the two locations. When we account for contributions of an F'-borne extra dinB gene, strain background differences, and bypass considerations of rates of spontaneous DNA breakage by providing I-SceI cuts, the chromosome is still ～100 times less active than F. We suggest that availability of a homologous partner molecule for recombinational break repair may be limiting. That partner could be a duplicated chromosomal segment or sister chromosome.     

A role for GIGANTEA: Keeping the balance between flowering and salinity stress tolerance

The initiation of flowering in Arabidopsis is retarded or abolished by environmental stresses. Focusing on salt stress, we provide a molecular explanation for this well-known fact. A protein complex consisting of GI, a clock component important for flowering and SOS2, a kinase activating the [Na⁺] antiporter SOS1, exists under no stress conditions. GI prevents SOS2 from activating SOS1. In the presence of NaCl, the SOS2/GI complex disintegrates and GI is degraded. SO2, together with the Ca²⁺-activated sensor of sodium ions, SOS3, activates SOS1. In gi mutants, SOS1 is constitutively activated and gi plants are more highly salt tolerant than wild type Arabidopsis. The model shows GI as a transitory regulator of SOS pathway activity whose presence or amount connects flowering to environmental conditions.