The development of chemical‐specific,risk‐based soil cleanup guidelines results in timely and cost‐effective remediation

Millions of dollars of limited state cleanup funds are spent each year in New Hampshire to identify, sample, excavate, and treat thousands of tons of contaminated soil. Cost analyses of numerous sites indicated that soil remediation costs alone reach upwards of $300,000.00 per site. The New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services “Interim Policy for Management of Soils Contaminated from Spills/Releases of Virgin Petroleum Products”; (DES, 1989, 1991) set conservative remediation goals based on total petroleum hydrocarbons in 1989 using the Leaching Potential Analysis method (California Luft Manual, 1989). A current review of available literature and several case histories indicated that chemical‐specific soil cleanup levels may be more appropriate for establishing remedial goals. New chemical‐specific soil cleanup guidelines using a risk‐based approach have been developed. These new guidelines are conservatively based using two principal considerations: (1) an assumed soil exposure scenario that estimated the human health risks associated with potential long‐term exposure to site soils via ingestion, inhalation and dermal contact and (2) the estimated fate and transport of chemicals of concern in the soil unsaturated zone. The first consideration assumed a total cancer risk that did not exceed 1 × 10^‐6. The second consideration employed the use of the SEasonal SOIL Compartment (SESOIL) model which simultaneously models water transport, sediment transport, and pollutant fate (US EPA, 1981). Several state soil standards from Oregon, Wisconsin, Massachusetts, and other states were extensively reviewed in order to develop a level of confidence that use of the SESOIL model was appropriate. A series of “sensitivity”; analyses was also performed in order to evaluate the response of the model to changes in various input parameters unique to New Hampshire's hydrogeologic conditions. Generic soil cleanup guidelines were developed for 24 petroleum‐based volatile and semivolatile chemicals of concern to be applied statewide. Site‐specific soil cleanup guidelines will be allowed if it can be demonstrated that insertion of site‐specific data into the model will not adversely affect groundwater quality. As a result of the above processes, timely and much more cost‐effective remediation will be achieved while still maintaining a high degree of protection of the groundwater quality and human health.     

Calculation of soil cleanup criteria for volatile organic compounds as controlled by the soil‐to‐groundwater pathway: Comparison of four unsaturated soil zone leaching models

Four computer models that predict leaching of chemicals in the unsaturated soil zone were used to calculate example soil cleanup criteria for volatile organic compounds, using a hypothetical environmental scenario. The criteria were calculated so that allowable groundwater concentrations for the chemicals were not exceeded. The models used were the Pesticide Root Zone Model (PRZM) and the Seasonal Soil Compartment Model (SESOIL) from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Sanitary Landfill Model (SLM1) from Oregon State University, and the Integrated Moisture and Aqueous Contaminant Transport model (IMPACT) under development for the State of New Jersey. The hypothetical scenario assumed a water table depth of 10 ft, a contaminated zone from 0 to 4 ft, and sandy loam soil properties. Transport times to groundwater were similar for all four models. The calculated soil criteria for many chemicals using the four models agreed to within an order of magnitude. In a few instances, SLM1 and PRZM predicted much lower cleanup criteria than the other two models because volatilization losses were not modeled. Calculated criteria were often quite low when degradation was assumed to be zero. When estimated degradation rates were employed, criteria were sometimes considerably higher.     

Derivation of Population-Level Ecological Remedial Action Objectives: Tualatin River Case Study

In 1997, Oregon enacted rules that define an unacceptable population-level risk as a >10% chance of >20% of the total local population receiving an exposure greater than the toxicity reference value. This rule applies to populations of plants and animals not listed as threatened or endangered. An operational procedure was developed to perform such population-level ecological risk assessments. This case study describes how this procedure was used to develop site-specific groundwater remedial action objectives for resident aquatic populations at a site in Northwest Oregon, where an upland petroleum pipeline released gasoline-range hydrocarbons (TPH-G) into soils and groundwater immediately upgradient of the Tualatin River. With an interim response in place, the goal was to proactively establish a remedial action objective that would equate to an acceptable risk level for populations of aquatic receptors potentially threatened by future groundwater discharges to the river. Approximately 10 and 32% dilutions of the water-soluble fraction of pure product produced an acceptable risk level for zooplankton and forage fish populations, respectively. The proposed population-level remedial action objective, based on zooplankton as the most sensitive receptor, was a TPH-G groundwater concentration of 17.4?mg/L.     

Estimation of the migration potential of diesel fuel constituents from soil to ground water: A case study

A methodology for estimating the migration potential of diesel fuel constituents from soil to ground water was developed for a large commercial property impacted by diesel fuel. The diesel fuel impacts are associated with former railyard practices that occurred prior to 1970. The site is being redeveloped for commercial use. The proposed improvements for the site include an asphalt‐paved parking lot over the location of the diesel fuel‐impacted soils. The methodology is based on the composition of weathered diesel fuel and the migration characteristics and toxicity data of the diesel fuel constituents. Based on these considerations, the two elements of the methodology are (1) an evaluation of the migration potential of diesel fuel constituents in soil using the soil synthetic rainwater leachate laboratory analysis; and (2) a health‐risk assessment of the diesel fuel ground water impacts. This approach provided sufficient site‐specific data to support a regulatory agency decision allowing development to continue without active remediation of the site soils. If the methodology had not been applied to the site, a remedial method based on a 100 mg/kg to 1000 mg/kg TPH underground storage tank (UST) program soil cleanup level would have likely been required. Considering the project's time constraints and financial requirements, remedial options such as offsite disposal or onsite thermal treatment would have been used resulting in cleanup costs likely exceeding $500, 000. The potential value of this methodology can be best appreciated considering that, based on EPA estimates, there are approximately 295, 000 contaminated UST sites and a significant portion of these sites are contaminated with diesel fuel. These sites could benefit considerably from this approach.     

Release of Chemicals from Contaminated Soils

At sites that contain contaminated soils, there can be questions about the magnitude of risk posed by the chemicals in the soils and about the cleanup levels that should be achieved. Knowledge about the rate of release of chemicals is important to answers to such questions. This article: (1) describes a laboratory protocol to obtain rate of release information for chemicals in soils, and (2) provides estimates of the rate of release of individual polyaromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) compounds from several manufactured gas plant (MGP) site soils. The data were analyzed using an empirical two-site model. Different fractions of PAH were released rapidly from these soils. For one soil, this fraction was less than 20%, for others, the fraction ranged from 36 to 85%. The first-order rate constant (k2) of PAH released during the slow phase of chemical release ranged from 0.0001 to 0.01 per hour.     

Methodology for using contaminated soil leachability testing to determine soil cleanup levels at contaminated petroleum underground storage tank (UST) sites

The costs of environmental remediation at leaking petroleum underground storage tank (UST) sites are influenced significantly by soil cleanup levels. The use of conservative generic soil cleanup levels may be inappropriate at some sites contaminated by leaking petroleum USTs. At many contaminated sites, a primary objective of site remediation is long‐term protection of water resources (e.g., groundwater) from pollution. Leaching of pollutants from residual soil contamination to groundwater is a primary consideration in establishing site‐specific soil cleanup levels at fuel‐contaminated sites. The use of laboratory soil leachability testing methods may be useful in objectively evaluating the leaching potential of contaminants from residual soil contamination and estimating potential groundwater impacts. Developing soil cleanup levels that are protective of water resources must include a technically sound integration of site‐specific soil leachability data and contaminant attenuation factors. Evaluation of the leaching potentials of soil contaminants may also provide essential supplementary information for other site characterization methods that may be used to evaluate risks to human health. Contaminant leachability testing of soils may provide a cost‐effective and technically based method for determining soil cleanup levels that are protective of groundwater resources at contaminated petroleum UST sites.     

A quantitative evaluation of ten approaches to setting site‐specific cleanup objectives

Over the past several years, a number of reviews of various approaches employed or proposed by different jurisdictions for setting contaminated site cleanup objectives have been conducted. These methods are normally divided into two groups: absolute and relative. The absolute approach establishes a numerical concentration for a contaminant in soil that is applied to all sites, regardless of site‐specific factors. The relative approach generally employs a risk assessment modeling technique to derive a soil cleanup number based on site‐specific and chemical‐specific factors that will result in an acceptable exposure or risk. In the latter case, the numerical concentrations may vary from site to site, but the risk is the same. In the former, the numerical concentration is the same from site to site, but the risk, although unstated, varies. Numerous reviews of these methods have been undertaken, but all have been qualitative in nature, examining theoretical bases and not comparing the actual performance of each method in the assessment of one site. We have undertaken to derive cleanup guidelines for a single, existing contaminated site in Canada using ten different methods. Five of these were absolute methods (British Columbia Assessment Criteria, Alberta Soil Guidelines, Ontario Decommissioning Guidelines, Quebec ABC's, and New Jersey Acceptable Soil Contaminant Levels) and five were relative methods (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Public Health Evaluation Manual, U.S. Army Primary Pollutant Limit Values, California Site Mitigation Decision Tree, California Technical Standard, and AERIS). The resulting analysis compares relative methods to absolute, examines the strengths and weaknesses of each approach, and discusses the similarities and differences of the outputs of the various approaches when employed to set cleanup objectives.     

DDTs in Soils Affected by Mosquito Fumigation in Belize

DDTs were sprayed extensively in Belize to combat malaria but widespread use ceased after 1997. To determine if DDTs still persist in Belize's soils, 23 composite soil samples were collected from each of the two towns of Dangriga and Punta Gorda. Dichlorodiphenyltricholoroethane (DDT) and its breakdown products dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE) and dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane (DDD) were the only organochlorine compounds detected in the soils. Results show that DDTs are transferred to the soil environment as a result of spraying houses and that the pesticides still persist in soils in southern Belize after more than 10 years of non-use. Sprayed lots had DDT concentrations up to 240 μg/kg in Dangriga and up to 410 μg/kg in Punta Gorda. All unsprayed lots had below detection limit concentrations, with the exception of two sites in Punta Gorda. Hot spot analysis in GIS indicates that significant spatial variability exists in detected concentrations of DDTs, which has implications for extrapolation of local data. Belize currently has no guidelines for determining risk of DDTs to human health and soil cleanup, but soil cleanup guidelines employed by foreign governmental entities such as the Netherlands and California show that all detected pesticide concentrations in this study are below mandated concentrations of concern for the residential areas of these regions. However, since exposure scenarios may be different in Belize, it is recommended that the Belize Ministry of Health conducts a risk analysis to ascertain if the concentrations of DDTs in sprayed areas pose a risk to the inhabitants of the two towns.     

Understanding Generic Soil Cleanup Levels: Implication on Agricultural Chemicals

Federal and state regulatory water quality standards have existed in the US for more than a decade while none existed for soil. More recently, the US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) developed a procedural model to determine minimum contaminant levels in soil that may require further investigation at the federal level. This model to determine federal soil screening levels (SSLs) by the US EPA has been slightly modified to determine state regulatory soil residual contaminant levels (RCLs) in Wisconsin. We present simplified equations for use on semivolatile compounds to evaluate these regulatory soil levels in residential settings, and in the process, we show where regulatory federal and state soil contaminant levels may differ. Establishing generic soil cleanup levels requires determining the smallest of the acceptable contaminant levels that are still considered protective of human health for all exposure pathways of concern. For the protection of direct human exposure pathways, the State of Wisconsin uses residential assumptions which are generally more conservative than federal defaults to determine acceptable levels. However, when indirect ingestion pathway via leaching through groundwater is considered, the federal generic SSLs may be more conservative than Wisconsin's generic RCLs when an organic contaminant's sorption coefficient, K_oc, falls between 4123 and 39,000?ml/g for non-carcinogens, and between 8568 and 45,525?ml/g for carcinogens. The simplified equations are used on several agricultural chemicals with current generic SSLs. Agricultural chemicals are unique because, unlike other compounds, they are designed for dispersal into the environment at legal application rates, and their generic cleanup levels may be developed based on their legal use rates. However, both the generic US EPA and Wisconsin models imply that if some agricultural chemicals are found at depth, even at use-rate levels, groundwater quality may be adversely affected.     

Assessment of Health Protectiveness of the Risk-Based Soil Remediation Standards of the Midwestern States

In the last decade, risk-based remediation following a framework similar to risk-based correction action (RBCA) has gained acceptance across the country and generic/Tier 1 Risk-Based Action Limits (RBALs) for hundreds of chemicals have been tabulated. However, there have been only a few studies that focused on understanding the causes of discrepancy among cleanup standards and policies of the hazardous waste programs among the states. This study aims to fill this critical need by examining the basis of generic (i.e., Tier 1) residential RBALs developed by the states, which are within the regulatory domain of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Region 5. Specifically, we seek to investigate the approaches/methodologies and the policy/technical rationale used in establishing RBALs, along with degree of inconsistency, and the causes and implications of inconsistencies. In addition, we developed RBALs for a case study site using both deterministic and probabilistic risk assessment approaches and compared these against RBALs developed by the states to infer about public health-protectiveness of the state-specific RBALs. We found three- and four-order-of magnitude difference among state RBALs for PAHs and VOCs, respectively. The degree of clean up deemed appropriate under Tier 1 evaluation by the midwestern states significantly differ from one another, which has both public health and economic implications.     

Adsorption of RDX to Soil with Low Organic Carbon: Laboratory Results,Field Observations,Remedial Implications

The purpose of this article is to review both laboratory and field observations of RDX adsorption to soils and to use those results to estimate the effects of a planned remedial action. Adsorption isotherms for RDX are generally observed to be linear and reversible. Statistical tests were performed to determine the relationship between K_d and various soil characteristics. A linear relationship between Kd and soil organic carbon was observed, as expected, but regression of K_d to organic carbon content indicated a non-zero intercept, suggesting that other sorbents may also be significant at low OC (e.g., > 0.5 %). No other soil properties were significantly related to Kd so the mechanism of adsorption at low organic carbon was not determined. These results were used to interpret observations of RDX in the vadose zone at Milan Army Ammunition Plant (MAAP), TN. MAAP exhibits widespread soil contamination by RDX. Depth to groundwater ranges from 40 to 80?ft. Unsaturated soils are fine grained near the surface, and sandy near the water table. RDX is concentrated in the upper 2?ft, where concentrations in some places exceed 1 %. Subsurface concentrations are generally less than 50?mg/kg. The distribution of RDX in soil, soil moisture and groundwater, and soil physical testing data were interpreted using simple models. The distribution of RDX is consistent with the following conceptual model: ??Water containing RDX was dis charged to the land surface (prior to 1983); ??Crystalline RDX remains in surface soil (remedial activities are ongo ing); ??Infiltrating rainwater leaches RDX from surface soils; ??This leachate carries RDX through the deeper vadose zone, resulting in significant soil contamination through out the full thickness of the vadose zone; these soils can generate leachate and adversely affect ground- water quality for many years to come. Field results were consistent with the adsorption studies. Simple models consistent with the field and laboratory observations indicate that deeper soils that are not planned to be remediated may continue to leach unacceptable concentrations to groundwater for approximately 180 years. The Army intends to evaluate whether it will be most cost-effective to address this continuing source by treating soils or groundwater.     

污染场地土壤生态风险评估研究进展

随着我国快速城市化以及产业结构的调整,遗留下了大量的污染场地,发展和实施污染场地土壤生态风险评估是进行大规模污染场地修复行动的必要条件。本文围绕污染场地土壤生态风险评估的科学原理、框架构建及技术方法等方面的关键问题: 1)评估框架的场地实际针对性;2)概念模型的不确定性;3)土壤复合污染毒性机制;4)评估终点筛选;5)评估方法和框架构建等展开讨论,指出土壤复合污染的制毒机制,即污染物生物有效性和联合效应是污染场地土壤生态风险评估的关键科学问题。耦合美国环保局四步法和欧盟层级法的“证据-权重法”评估框架适用于野外复杂环境条件下的土壤污染生态风险评估。建议今后重点开展以下5个方面的工作: 1)污染场地土壤生态风险评估技术框架与风险管控技术框架之间的联合;2)概念模型研究;3)基于过程的场地土壤污染物反应运移模型研究;4)场地土壤复合污染生态毒理学机制研究;5)生态系统高水平生态风险评估终点研究。旨在为形成我国本土污染场地土壤生态风险评估技术指南提供理论基础和构架。     

Indoor Air Inhalation Risk Assessment for Volatiles Emanating from Light Nonaqueous Phase Liquids

The indoor air inhalation pathway for volatile contaminants in soil and groundwater has received much attention recently. The risk of exposure may be higher when volatile organic compounds (VOCs) reside as constituents of a free product plume below residential or commercial structures than when dissolved in groundwater or adsorbed on soil. A methodology was developed for assessing the potential for vapor phase migration—and associated risk of indoor air inhalation—of volatile constituents from a light nonaqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) plume on top of the water table. The potential risk from inhalation of VOCs in indoor air emanating from a subsurface Jet Fuel 4 (JP-4) plume by hypothetical residential receptors was assessed at a site. Chemicals of concern (COCs) were identified and evaluated using data from the composition of JP-4 mixtures and published chemical, physical, and toxicological data. The method estimates the equilibrium vapor concentrations of JP-4 constituents using Raoult's Law for partial vapor pressure of mixtures based on assumptions about the mixture composition of JP-4. The maximum allowable vapor concentration at the source (immediately above the LNAPL) corresponding to an indoor air target concentration based on acceptable risk levels are calculated using the Johnson and Ettinger model. The model calculates the attenuation factor caused by the migration of the vapor phase VOCs through the soil column above the JP-4 plume and through subsurface foundation slabs. Finally, the maximum allowable soil gas concentrations above the LNAPL for individual constituents were calculated using this methodology and compared to the calculated equilibrium vapor concentrations of each COC to assess the likelihood of potential risk from the indoor air inhalation pathway.     

Significance of organic chemical adsorption in soil and groundwater remediation

Adsorption of organic chemicals onto soils is affected by a number of factors related to the soil properties, chemical type, and environment. Organic chemical adsorption has significant impact on soil and groundwater cleanup criteria and on the time required for remediation using in situ vapor extraction, bioventing, and biosparging methods. Phase equilibrium relationships will permit specifying the contaminant concentration levels in soil that would prevent groundwater contamination beyond the limits prescribed by provincial regulations. Computer programs that neglect the adsorption effects will significantly underestimate the time required for soil remediation by vapor extraction.     

Background levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and selected metals in new England urban soils

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) are byproducts of combustion and are ubiquitous in the urban environment They are also present in industrial chemical wastes, such as coal tar, petroleum refinery sludges, waste oils and fuels, and wood‐treating residues. Thus, PAHs are chemicals of concern at many waste sites. Risk assessment methods will yield risk‐based cleanup levels for PAHs that range from 0.1 to 0.7 mg/kg. Given their universal presence in the urban environment, it is important to compare risk‐based cleanup levels with typical urban background levels before utilizing unrealistically low cleanup targets. However, little data exist on PAH levels in urban, nonindustrial soils. In this study, 60 samples of surficial soils from urban locations in three New England cities were analyzed for PAH compounds. In addition, all samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and seven metals. The upper 95% confidence interval on the mean was 3 mg/kg for benzo(a)pyrene toxic equivalents, 12 mg/kg for total potentially carcinogenic PAH, and 25 mg/kg for total PAH. The upper 95% confidence interval was 373 mg/kg for TPH, which exceeds the target level of 100 mg/kg used by many state regulatory agencies. Metal concentrations were similar to published background levels for all metals except lead. The upper 95% confidence interval for lead was 737 mg/kg in Boston, 463 mg/kg in Providence, and 378 mg/kg in Springfield.     

Phytoremediation removal rates of benzene,toluene, and chlorobenzene

Phytoremediation is a sustainable remedial approach, although performance efficacy is rarely reported. In this study, we assessed a phytoremediation plot treating benzene, toluene, and chlorobenzene. A comparison of the calculated phytoremediation removal rate with estimates of onsite contaminant mass was used to forecast cleanup periods. The investigation demonstrated that substantial microbial degradation was occurring in the subsurface. Estimates of transpiration indicated that the trees planted were removing approximately 240,000 L of water per year. This large quantity of water removal implies substantial removal of contaminant due to large amounts of contaminants in the groundwater; however, these contaminants extensively sorb to the soil, resulting in large quantities of contaminant mass in the subsurface. The total estimate of subsurface contaminant mass was also complicated by the presence of non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPL), additional contaminant masses that were difficult to quantify. These uncertainties of initial contaminant mass at the site result in large uncertainty in the cleanup period, although mean estimates are on the order of decades. Collectively, the model indicates contaminant removal rates on the order of 10^?2–10⁰ kg/tree/year. The benefit of the phytoremediation system is relatively sustainable cleanup over the long periods necessary due to the presence of NAPL.     

Quantitative Risk Assessment of Trichloroethylene for a Former Chemical Works in Shanghai,China

Assessment of the potential risks posed by chlorinated solvents in groundwater is the key to establish the extent of the contamination and derive achievable remedial targets should remediation deems necessary. This article first presents the application of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Risk Based Corrective Actions (RBCA) Guidance to quantitatively evaluate human health and environmental risk for a former chemical works in Shanghai, China. The observed maximum trichloroethylene (TCE) concentration in groundwater at the site reached 1220 mg/l that exceeded its solubility of 1070 mg/l at 10°C (Soil annual average temperature is 10°C in Shanghai). The maximum concentration for cis-1, 2-DCE (DCE) was also found to be elevated at 264 mg/l. A critical exposure pathway was considered to be indoor vapor intrusion of TCE into the buildings with excess lifetime cancer risk for children being 1.7 × 10^?3. This cancer risk exceeded regulatory limits of 1 × 10^?4 to 1 × 10^?6 for The Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The calculated groundwater remedial targets for TCE and DCE are 7 mg/l and 904 mg/l, respectively, in order to protect child residents from inhalation of indoor vapors within the close proximity of the source area.     

沈阳某冶炼厂废弃厂区的人类健康风险评价

以沈阳某冶炼厂废弃厂区重金属污染监测为依据,采用美国环保局最新的人类健康风险评价标准方法对沈阳某冶炼厂废弃地块污染土壤进行了评价,并且假设未来该土地利用类型为工业用地(Ⅰ)或休闲用地(Ⅱ).评价结果显示:工业用地(Ⅰ)和休闲用地(Ⅱ)的累积非致癌风险指数分别为2.65×10-2和3.67×10-2;工业用地(Ⅰ)和休闲用地(Ⅱ)由呼吸摄入Cd造成的潜在致癌风险指数分别为4.48×10-9和7.30×10-10,不会对在该地区工作和休闲的人们造成身体健康上的伤害;无论是工业用地假设还是休闲用地假设,由无机铜造成的人类健康风险在整个风险中所占的比例最大;由美国环保局的人类健康风险评价方法反推得出的冶炼厂地块未来为工业用地的土壤修复目标值均小于我国工业企业土壤环境质量风险评价基准值.     

Carbonaceous Resin Capsule for Vapor-phase Monitoring of Volatile Monoaromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil

Soil and groundwater contamination by organic substances is a major environmental and health concern, but methods of direct, in situ evaluation of quantities and forms of these contaminants are generally highly limited. The resin capsule system (RCS) has been developed for use in the laboratory or in the field for inorganic chemicals, and its application has been extended to include organic chemicals by incorporation of carbonaceous, hydrophobic adsorbers in the capsules. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of carbonaceous resin capsules for detecting benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) vapors diffusing through a soil column, and to investigate sensitivity to environmental factors that influence vapor phase diffusion. Results show that the RCS can serve as a trap for organic vapors, and that quantities of BTEX accumulated are influenced by soil texture and water content during extended adsorption times. The nature of these effects, as measured by the RCS, was similar to expectations, based on previously reported results from studies involving direct measurements. These results provide evidence that the RCS could be developed to serve as a simple, inexpensive, direct, in situ methodology for monitoring volatile organic chemicals in soils.     

Methanotrophic Bacteria in the Rhizosphere of Trichloroethylene-Degrading Plants

The presence and density of methanotrophic bacteria has been shown to play an important role in the bioremediation of trichloroethylene (TCE). This article describes the methanotrophic bacterial densities in rhizosphere soils from two areas of the Department of Energy's Savannah River Site in Aiken, South Carolina. A direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) technique was evaluated to determine the presence of methanotrophic bacteria in roots and rhizospheres from vascular plants. The first site, the Miscellaneous Chemical Basin (MCB), was contaminated with a mixture of chemicals, including chlorinated solvents. The second site will be potentially affected by outcropping of TCE-contaminated groundwater. Significantly higher numbers of methanotrophic bacteria were observed with DFA in rhizosphere soils and on roots of Lespedeza cuneata and Pinus taeda (that previously showed higher rates of ¹⁴C-TCE mineralization) compared with nonvegetated soils. In addition, viable and heterotrophic microbial counts were consistently higher in rhizosphere soils and on plant roots compared with nonvegetated soils. Therefore, the presence of these plant species may enhance ¹⁴C-TCE mineralization by selectively increasing the microbial population in the root zone. Methanotrophic bacteria were directly observed by DFA in soils, on the surface of root hairs, within plant roots, and in higher densities associated with mycorrhizal fungi. These experiments provide further evidence that specific types of bacterial interactions with vegetation in the rhizosphere may play an important role in remediation of TCE-contaminated soils and groundwater.