代谢型谷氨酸受体在突触可塑性中的作用研究进展

突触可塑性是近 30年来神经科学领域的研究热点之一 ,它主要包括长时程增强 (long termpotentiation ,LTP)和长时程抑制 (long termdepression ,LTD)。以往的研究已经证实 ,离子型谷氨酸受体 (iGluRs)中的NMDA受体和AMPA受体 ,在LTP和LTD的诱导和维持中通过阳离子内流 ,引起细胞内的级联反应而起作用。新近的研究发现 ,代谢型谷氨酸受体 (mGluRs)与G蛋白偶联 ,通过细胞内的多种信使系统介导慢突触传递。本文主要就mGluRs在不同脑区LTP和LTD中的作用进行综述     

突触可塑性的数学公式

提出突触可塑性的一个可能的数学公式,尝试用这个公式统一地描述突触长时程增强效应和突触长时程抑制效应。     

长时程增强效应初始阶段有突触前蛋白簇数目的快速增加

突触传递的长时程增强效应 (ＬＴＰ)和长时程抑制效应 (ＬＴＤ)反映神经元间突触传递效能的变化 ,目前认为这是学习和记忆的基础 ,而谷氨酸受体在ＬＴＰ和ＬＴＤ的诱导中起关键作用。海马是与学习和记忆功能密切相关的脑区 ,Ａｎｔｏｎｏｖａ等近来研究发现 ,体外培养的海马神经元在ＬＴＰ初始阶段有突触后谷氨酸受体 (ＧｌｕＲ1)簇数目的增加 ,而且在突触前神经元有突触前蛋白簇突触素数目以及突触素与谷氨酸受体共存位点数目的快速、持久的增加。进一步实验证明ＬＴＰ初始阶段并没有新蛋白的合成 ,突触前和突触后神经元蛋白质数目的快速增…     

突触可塑性调节过程中蛋白质磷酸化修饰的研究进展

突触可塑性可以导致神经元传递效率的改变,是神经系统发育、学习记忆等脑的高级功能活动中细胞功能的重要基础.蛋白质磷酸化修饰通过蛋白激酶和蛋白磷酸酶之间的动态平衡对突触可塑性和突触传递的长期调节,参与各种脑疾病(包括精神疾病和神经退行性疾病)的发生发展.本文综述了磷酸化修饰和突触可塑性的关系,重点介绍了长时程增强和长时程抑...     

长时程突触可塑性中的突触标识

神经元长时程突触可塑性是学习和记忆的基础,神经元长时程突触可塑性的维持依赖于基因的转录和蛋白质合成.然而,这些转录产物和新合成的蛋白质是如何从胞体运输到突触点,还不甚清楚.近年来的研究显示,当长时程突触可塑性发生时,被激活的突触能通过建立突触标记(synaptic tag)来识别、捕捉和利用其所需要的基因产物,以维持突触可塑性的长时程变化.这一过程或现象被称为突触标识(synaptic tagging).本文就近年来突触标识的研究进展作一概述.     

短时程突触可塑性研究概况

突触可塑性是神经系统所具有的重要特征,也是神经系统实现其功能的重要保障。按照持续的时间划分,突触可塑性可分为短时程突触可塑性和长时程突触可塑性。短时程突触可塑性包括短时程增强和短时程压抑两种类型。与长时程突触可塑性不同,短时程突触可塑性的产生主要依赖于神经递质释放概率的变化,其往往决定神经回路的信息处理和反应模式,不仅直接参与了对输入信号的识别和处理,而且还可对长时程突触可塑性的表达产生重要影响。     

在体大鼠海马Schaffer-CA1条件化双通路与海马组合突触可塑性

在戊巴比妥钠麻醉的Sprague-Dawley大鼠上,运用海马Schaffer-CA1双通路条件化作用(低频配对,600对脉冲,5Hz,配对刺激相应的兴奋性突触后电位峰值时间间隔为10ms)在两条Schaffer-CA1条件化通路上同时诱导出突触可塑性,呈现出海马组合突触可塑性。结果显示:不管海马Schaffer-CA1双通路独立与否,双通路条件化作用均可以同时诱导出长时程增强(long-term potentiation,LTP)和长时程抑制(long-term depression,LTD),呈现出LTP/LTD组合突触可塑性。结果表明:海马Schaffer-CA1双通路技术,可实现海马突触可塑性的双向诱导,可塑性的方向取决于突触的自身状态。由此提示,与传统的高频诱导LTP低频诱导LTD相比,在海马Schaffer-CA1双通路条件化作用诱导出的组合突触可塑性可以更好地编码海马相关的学习记忆,体现了海马突触可塑性的灵活性与稳定性。     

应激和学习对突触效能的调控机制

长期以来人们知道应激与学习和记忆存在着密切的关系。十多年来的研究进展表明应激调控着长时程增强。然而对应激是否影响到长时程抑制却知之甚少。本文简要的介绍了应有 激,学习对突触可塑性的影响的一些主要实验结果。探讨突中可塑性在神经信息储存中的作用。     

寡聚体Aβ1-42对大鼠海马突触可塑性的慢性影响

突触传递的长时程抑制(long-term depression,LTD)和长时程增强(longterm-potentiation,LTP)是突触可塑性的两种重要形式,并且与学习记忆密切相关.本文探讨Sprague-Dawley(SD)大鼠在海马齿状回区(dentate gyrus,DG)注射36 h孵育形成的寡聚体Aβ...     

东莨菪碱,印防己毒素对习得性长时程突触增强的影响

在大鼠条件性饮水反应的建立、消退和再建立过程中,于海马 CA_3区记录电极部位微量注射 M-胆碱受体阻断剂东莨菪碱和 GABA 受体阻断剂印防已毒素,观察其对习得性长时程突触增强的影响。结果表明,东莨菪碱有明显的抑制作用,印防已毒素则有明显的易化作用,同时相应地影响条件性行为;并发现习得性长时程突触增强的发展与变化是超前于条件性行为的发展和改变的。上述结果为进一步论证习得性长时程突触增强可能是学习和记忆的神经基础之一提供了证据,并提示海马 CA_3区习得性长时程增强的产生与保持有胆碱受体与 GABA 受体参与。     

Group I mGluRs and Long-Term Depression: Potential Roles in Addiction?

Addiction is an enormous societal problem. A number of recent studies have focused on adaptations at glutamatergic synapses that may play a role in the behavioral responses to drugs of abuse. These studies have largely focused on NMDA receptor-dependent forms of synaptic plasticity such as NMDA receptor-dependent long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD). A growing body of evidence, however, suggests that metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) also play important roles in the behavioral responses to drugs of abuse and participate in producing synaptic plasticity at glutamate synapses. In this review, we focus first on the evidence supporting a role for mGluRs in addiction and then on the properties of mGluR-dependent forms of synaptic plasticity, focusing in particular on Gq-linked receptor-induced LTD.     

NMDA受体与Ⅰ组代谢型谷氨酸受体的相互作用

谷氨酸是哺乳动物中枢神经系统重要兴奋性神经递质,参与学习、记忆、药物依赖成瘾及神经系统退行性疾病等多种病理生理过程。谷氨酸通过激活离子型（iGluRs）和代谢型谷氨酸受体（mGluRs）发挥作用。业已有研究提示iGluRs和mGluRs之间存在相互作用,但具体机制尚待阐明。本文从蛋白分子结构、突触可塑性、相互作用可能涉及的信号分子和通路等方面综述了NMDAR与Ⅰ组mGluRs之间的相互作用,旨在为深入研究谷氨酸受体之间的相互作用提供线索。     

Group I mGluR regulates the polarity of spike-timing dependent plasticity in substantia gelatinosa neurons

The spinal synaptic plasticity is associated with a central sensitization of nociceptive input, which accounts for the generation of hyperalgesia in chronic pain. However, how group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) may operate spinal plasticity remains essentially unexplored. Here, we have identified spike-timing dependent synaptic plasticity in substantia gelatinosa (SG) neurons, using perforated patch-clamp recordings of SG neuron in a spinal cord slice preparation. In the presence of bicuculline and strychnine, long-term potentiation (LTP) was blocked by AP-5 and Ca2+ chelator BAPTA-AM. The group I mGluR antagonist AIDA, PLC inhibitor U-73122, and IP3 receptor blocker 2-APB shifted LTP to long-term depression (LTD) without affecting acute synaptic transmission. These findings provide a link between postsynaptic group I mGluR/PLC/IP3-gated Ca2+ store regulating the polarity of synaptic plasticity and spinal central sensitization.     

Characterization of a metabotropic glutamate receptor in the honeybee (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Apis mellifera</Emphasis>): implications for memory formation

G-protein-coupled metabotropic glutamate receptors (GPC mGluRs) are important constituents of glutamatergic synapses where they contribute to synaptic plasticity and development. Here we characterised a member of this family in the honeybee. We show that the honeybee genome encodes a genuine mGluR (AmGluRA) that is expressed at low to medium levels in both pupal and adult brains. Analysis of honeybee protein sequence places it within the type 3 GPCR family, which includes mGlu receptors, GABA-B receptors, calcium-sensing receptors, and pheromone receptors. Phylogenetic comparisons combined with pharmacological evaluation in HEK 293 cells transiently expressing AmGluRA show that the honeybee protein belongs to the group II mGluRs. With respect to learning and memory AmGluRA appears to be required for memory formation. Both agonists and antagonists selective against the group II mGluRs impair long-term (24 h) associative olfactory memory formation when applied 1 h before training, but have no effect when injected post-training or pre-testing. Our results strengthen the notion that glutamate is a key neurotransmitter in memory processes in the honeybee.     

mGluRs Modulate Strength and Timing of Excitatory Transmission in Hippocampal Area CA3

Excitatory transmission within hippocampal area CA3 stems from three major glutamatergic pathways: the perforant path formed by axons of layer II stellate cells in the entorhinal cortex, the mossy fiber axons originating from the dentate gyrus granule cells, and the recurrent axon collaterals of CA3 pyramidal cells. The synaptic communication of each of these pathways is modulated by metabotropic glutamate receptors that fine-tune the signal by affecting both the timing and strength of the connection. Within area CA3 of the hippocampus, group I mGluRs (mGluR1 and mGluR5) are expressed postsynaptically, whereas group II (mGluR2 and mGluR3) and III mGluRs (mGluR4, mGluR7, and mGluR8) are expressed presynaptically. Receptors from each group have been demonstrated to be required for different forms of pre- and postsynaptic long-term plasticity and also have been implicated in regulating short-term plasticity. A recent observation has demonstrated that a presynaptically expressed mGluR can affect the timing of action potentials elicited in the postsynaptic target. Interestingly, mGluRs can be distributed in a target-specific manner, such that synaptic input from one presynaptic neuron can be modulated by different receptors at each of its postsynaptic targets. Consequently, mGluRs provide a mechanism for synaptic specialization of glutamatergic transmission in the hippocampus. This review will highlight the variability in mGluR modulation of excitatory transmission within area CA3 with an emphasis on how these receptors contribute to the strength and timing of network activity within pyramidal cells and interneurons.     

Inside story of Group I Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors (mGluRs)

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) that are activated by the neurotransmitter glutamate in the central nervous system. Among the eight subtypes, mGluR1 and mGluR5 belong to the group I family. These receptors play important roles in the brain and are believed to be involved in multiple forms of experience dependent synaptic plasticity including learning and memory. In addition, group I mGluRs also have been implicated in various neuropsychiatric disorders like Fragile X syndrome, autism etc. The normal signaling depends on the precise location of these receptors in specific region of the neuron and the process of receptor trafficking plays a crucial role in controlling this localization. Intracellular trafficking could also regulate the desensitization, resensitization, down-regulation and intracellular signaling of these receptors. In this review I focus on the current understanding of group I mGluR regulation in the central nervous system and also their role in neuropsychiatric disorders.     

Simulation of postsynaptic glutamate receptors reveals critical features of glutamatergic transmission

Activation of several subtypes of glutamate receptors contributes to changes in postsynaptic calcium concentration at hippocampal synapses, resulting in various types of changes in synaptic strength. Thus, while activation of NMDA receptors has been shown to be critical for long-term potentiation (LTP) and long term depression (LTD) of synaptic transmission, activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) has been linked to either LTP or LTD. While it is generally admitted that dynamic changes in postsynaptic calcium concentration represent the critical elements to determine the direction and amplitude of the changes in synaptic strength, it has been difficult to quantitatively estimate the relative contribution of the different types of glutamate receptors to these changes under different experimental conditions. Here we present a detailed model of a postsynaptic glutamatergic synapse that incorporates ionotropic and mGluR type I receptors, and we use this model to determine the role of the different receptors to the dynamics of postsynaptic calcium with different patterns of presynaptic activation. Our modeling framework includes glutamate vesicular release and diffusion in the cleft and a glutamate transporter that modulates extracellular glutamate concentration. Our results indicate that the contribution of mGluRs to changes in postsynaptic calcium concentration is minimal under basal stimulation conditions and becomes apparent only at high frequency of stimulation. Furthermore, the location of mGluRs in the postsynaptic membrane is also a critical factor, as activation of distant receptors contributes significantly less to calcium dynamics than more centrally located ones. These results confirm the important role of glutamate transporters and of the localization of mGluRs in postsynaptic sites in their signaling properties, and further strengthen the notion that mGluR activation significantly contributes to postsynaptic calcium dynamics only following high-frequency stimulation. They also provide a new tool to analyze the interactions between metabotropic and ionotropic glutamate receptors.     

Long Lasting Protein Synthesis- and Activity-Dependent Spine Shrinkage and Elimination after Synaptic Depression

Neuronal circuits modify their response to synaptic inputs in an experience-dependent fashion. Increases in synaptic weights are accompanied by structural modifications, and activity dependent, long lasting growth of dendritic spines requires new protein synthesis. When multiple spines are potentiated within a dendritic domain, they show dynamic structural plasticity changes, indicating that spines can undergo bidirectional physical modifications. However, it is unclear whether protein synthesis dependent synaptic depression leads to long lasting structural changes. Here, we investigate the structural correlates of protein synthesis dependent long-term depression (LTD) mediated by metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) through two-photon imaging of dendritic spines on hippocampal pyramidal neurons. We find that induction of mGluR-LTD leads to robust and long lasting spine shrinkage and elimination that lasts for up to 24 hours. These effects depend on signaling through group I mGluRs, require protein synthesis, and activity. These data reveal a mechanism for long lasting remodeling of synaptic inputs, and offer potential insights into mental retardation.     

Molecular mechanisms coordinating functional and morphological plasticity at the synapse: Role of GluA2/N-cadherin interaction-mediated actin signaling in mGluR-dependent LTD

Long-lasting synaptic plasticity involves changes in both synaptic morphology and electrical signaling (here referred to as structural and functional plasticity). Recent studies have revealed a myriad of molecules and signaling processes that are critical for each of these two forms of plasticity, but whether and how they are mechanistically linked to achieve coordinated changes remain controversial.It is well accepted that functional plasticity at the excitatory synapse is dependent upon the activities of glutamate receptors. While the activation of NMDARs (N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptors) and/or mGluRs (metabotropic glutamate receptors) is required for the induction of many forms of plasticity, AMPARs (alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid receptors), the principal mediators of fast excitatory synaptic transmission, are the ultimate targets of modifications that express functional plasticity. Investigations exploring structural plasticity have been mainly focused on the small membranous protrusions on the dendrites called spines. The morphological regulation of these spines is mediated by the reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton, the predominant structural component of the synapse. In this regard, the Rho family of GTPases, particularly Rac1, RhoA and Cdc42, is found to be the central regulator of spine actin and structural plasticity of the synapse.It is thought that the collaborative interaction between functional and structural factors underlies the sustained or permanent nature of long-lasting synaptic plasticity such as long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD), the most extensively studied forms of synaptic plasticity widely regarded as cellular mechanisms for learning and memory. However, data specifically pertaining to whether and how these two distinct components are linked at the molecular level remain sparse. In this regard, we have identified a number of synaptic proteins that are involved in both structural and functional changes during mGluR-dependent LTD (mGluR-LTD). Among these are the GluA2 (formerly called GluR2) subunit of AMPARs, Rac1 and Rac1-activated kinases. We have discovered that these proteins interact and reciprocally regulate each other, which led us to hypothesize that the GluA2–Rac1 interaction may serve as a coordinator between functional and morphological plasticity. In this review, we will briefly discuss the available evidence to support such a hypothesis.