The Set2 methyltransferase associates with Ssn6 yet Tup1-Ssn6 repression is independent of histone methylation

The Tup1-Ssn6 corepressor regulates the expression of diverse classes of genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Chromatin is an important component of Tup1-Ssn6-mediated repression. Tup1 binds to underacetylated tails of histones H3 and H4, and requires multiple histone deacetylases for the repression. Here we examine if histone methylation, in addition to histone deacetylation, plays a role in Tup1-Ssn6 repression. We found that like other genes, Tup1-Ssn6 target genes exhibit increased levels of histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation upon activation. However, deletion of individual or multiple histone methyltransferases and other SET-domain containing genes has no apparent effect on Tup1-Ssn6-mediated repression of a number of well-defined targets. Interestingly, we discovered that Ssn6 interacts with Set2. Although deletion of SET2 does not affect Tup1-Ssn6 repression of a number of target genes, Ssn6 may utilize Set2 in specific contexts to regulate gene repression.     

Recruitment of Tup1-Ssn6 by yeast hypoxic genes and chromatin-independent exclusion of TATA binding protein

The Tup1-Ssn6 general repression complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae represses a wide variety of regulons. Regulon-specific DNA binding proteins recruit the repression complex, and their synthesis, activity, or localization controls the conditions for repression. Rox1 is the hypoxic regulon-specific protein, and a second DNA binding protein, Mot3, augments repression at tightly controlled genes. We addressed the requirements for Tup1-Ssn6 recruitment to two hypoxic genes, ANB1 and HEM13, by using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. Either Rox1 or Mot3 could recruit Ssn6, but Tup1 recruitment required Ssn6 and Rox1. We also monitored events during derepression. Rox1 and Mot3 dissociated from DNA quickly, accounting for the rapid accumulation of ANB1 and HEM13 RNAs, suggesting a simple explanation for induction. However, Tup1 remained associated with these genes, suggesting that the localization of Tup1-Ssn6 is not the sole determinant of repression. We could not reproduce the observation that deletion of the Tup1-Ssn6-interacting protein Cti6 was required for induction. Finally, Tup1 is capable of repression through a chromatin-dependent mechanism, the positioning of a nucleosome over the TATA box, or a chromatin-independent mechanism. We found that the rate of derepression was independent of the positioned nucleosome and that the TATA binding protein was excluded from ANB1 even in the absence of the positioned nucleosome. The mediator factor Srb7 has been shown to interact with Tup1 and to play a role in repression at several regulons, but we found that significant levels of repression remained in srb7 mutants even when the chromatin-dependent repression mechanism was eliminated. These findings suggest that the repression of different regulons or genes may invoke different mechanisms.