Cone-beam CT-based inter-fraction localization errors for tumors in the pelvic region

PurposeTo evaluate inter-fraction tumor localization errors (TE) in the RapidArc® treatment of pelvic cancers based on CBCT. Appropriate CTV-to PTV margins in a non-IGRT scenario have been proposed.MethodsData of 928 patients with prostate, gynecological, and rectum/anal canal cancers were retrospectively analyzed to determine systematic and random localization errors. Two protocols were used: daily online IGRT (d-IGRT) and weekly IGRT. The latter consisted in acquiring a CBCT for the first 3 fractions and subsequently once a week. TE for patients who underwent d-IGRT protocol were calculated using either all CBCTs or the first 3.ResultsThe systematic (and random) TE in the AP, LL, and SI direction were: for prostate bed 2.7(3.2), 2.3(2.8) and 1.9(2.2) mm; for prostate 4.2(3.1), 2.9(2.8) and 2.3(2.2) mm; for gynecological 3.0(3.6), 2.4(2.7) and 2.3(2.5) mm; for rectum 2.8(2.8), 2.4(2.8) and 2.3(2.5) mm; for anal canal 3.1(3.3), 2.1(2.5) and 2.2(2.7) mm. CTV-to-PTV margins determined from all CBCTs were 14 mm in the AP, 10 mm in the LL and 9–9.5 mm in the SI directions for the prostate and the gynecological groups and 9.5–10.5 mm in AP, 9 mm in LL and 8–10 mm in the SI direction for the prostate bed and the rectum/anal canal groups. If assessed on the basis of the first 3 CBCTs, the calculated CTV-to-PTV margins were slightly larger.Conclusionswithout IGRT, large CTV-to-PTV margins up to 15 mm are required to account for inter-fraction tumor localization errors. Daily IGRT should be used for all hypo-fractionated treatments to reduce margins and avoid increased toxicity to critical organs.     

Impact of patient setup error in the treatment of head and neck cancer with intensity modulated radiation therapy

PurposeTo study the impact of setup errors on the dose to the target volume and critical structures in the treatment of cancer of nasopharynx with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).Methods and materialsTwelve patients of carcinoma of nasopharynx treated by IMRT with simultaneous integrated boost technique were enrolled. The gross tumor volume, clinical target volume and low-risk nodal region were planned for 70, 59.4 and 54 Gy, respectively, in 33 fractions. Based on the constraints, treatment plans were generated. Keeping it as the base plan, the patient setup error was simulated for 3, 5 and 10 mm by shifting the isocenter in all three directions viz. anterior, posterior, superior, inferior, right and left lateral. The plans were evaluated for mean dose, maximum dose, volume of PTV receiving >110% and <93% of the prescribed dose. For both the parotids, the mean dose and the dose received by >50% of the parotid were evaluated. The maximum dose and dose received by 2 cc of spinal cord were also analyzed.ResultsThe dose to the target volume decreases gradually with increase in setup error. The superior and inferior shifts play major role in tumor under-dosage. A setup error of 3 mm along the posterior and lateral directions significantly affects the dose to the spinal cord. Similarly, setup error along lateral and anterior directions affects the dose to both parotids.ConclusionsThe isocenter position should be verified regularly to ensure that the goal of IMRT is achieved.     

Repositioning accuracy of a novel thermoplastic mask for head and neck cancer radiotherapy

PurposeThe aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility of patient shoulder position immobilized with a novel and innovative prototype mask (E-Frame, Engineering System).MethodsThe E-frame mask fixes both shoulders and bisaxillary regions compared with that of a commercial mask (Type-S, CIVCO). Thirteen and twelve patients were immobilized with the Type-S and E-Frame mask systems, respectively. For each treatment fraction, cone-beam CT (CBCT) images of the patient were acquired and retrospectively analyzed. The CBCT images were registered to the planning CT based on the cervical spine, and then the displacements of the acromial extremity of the clavicle were measured.ResultsThe systematic and random errors between the two mask systems were evaluated. The differences of the systematic errors between the two mask systems were not statistically significant. The mean random errors in the three directions (AP, SI and LR) were 2.7 mm, 3.1 mm and 1.5 mm, respectively for the Type-S mask, and 2.8 mm 2.5 mm and 1.4 mm, respectively for the E-Frame mask. The random error of the E-Frame masks in the SI direction was significantly smaller than that of the Type-S. The number of cases showing displacements exceeding 10 mm in the SI direction for at least one fraction was eight (61% of 13 cases) and three (25% of 12 cases) for Type-S and E-Frame masks, respectively.ConclusionsThe E-Frame masks reduced the random displacements of patient’s shoulders in the SI direction, effectively preventing large shoulder shifts that occurred frequently with Type-S masks.     

Performance assessment of surface-guided radiation therapy and patient setup in head-and-neck and breast cancer patients based on statistical process control

PurposeTo assess the effectiveness of SGRT in clinical applications through statistical process control (SPC).MethodsTaking the patients’ positioning through optical surface imaging (OSI) as a process, the average level of process execution was defined as the process mean. Setup errors detected by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and OSI were extracted for head-and-neck cancer (HNC) and breast cancer patients. These data were used to construct individual and exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) control charts to analyze outlier fractions and small process shifts from the process mean. Using the control charts and process capability indices derived from this process, the patient positioning-related OSI performance and setup error were analyzed for each patient.ResultsOutlier fractions and small shifts from the process mean that are indicative of setup errors were found to be widely prevalent, with the outliers randomly distributed between fractions. A systematic error of up to 1.6 mm between the OSI and CBCT results was observed in all directions, indicating a significantly degraded OSI performance. Adjusting this systematic error for each patient using setup errors of the first five fractions could effectively mitigate these effects. Process capability analysis following adjustment for systematic error indicated that OSI performance was acceptable (process capability index C_pk = 1.0) for HNC patients but unacceptable (C_pk < 0.75) for breast cancer patients.ConclusionSPC is a powerful tool for detecting the outlier fractions and process changes. Our application of SPC to patient-specific evaluations validated the suitability of OSI in clinical applications involving patient positioning.     

A comparative study of prostate PTV margins for patients using hydrogel spacer or rectal balloon in proton therapy

PurposeTo compare the planning target volume (PTV) margins needed for prostate patients who have used hydrogel spacer or rectal balloon during proton treatments.MethodTotal of 190 prostate patients treated with proton therapy during 2017 were selected for this study. Of these patients, 96 had hydrogel spacer injection and 94 patients had only rectal balloons insertion. All patients had implanted gold markers inside the prostate for daily target alignment. Post-treatment radigraphs were obtained to evaluate prostate intrafraction motion. The systematic and random components of patient setup residual error and prostate intrafraction motion error were obtained. PTV margins were calculated using the van Herk formula for both patient groups.ResultsFor setup residual error, the mean values in the superior-inferior (SI) direction and the variances in the left–right (LR) direction were statistically different between the two groups. For intrafraction motion, there were significant differences of the mean values in the SI direction and of the variances in both LR and anterior-posterior (AP) directions. The population PTV margins for hydrogel spacer group were 2.6 mm, 3.3 mm, and 1.6 mm in LR, SI, AP directions, respectively. For the rectal balloon group, the PTV margins were 2.1 mm, 3.1 mm, and 2.0 mm in LR, SI, AP directions, respectively.ConclusionStatistically significant differences were observed in the patient setup and prostate intrafraction motion errors of the two patient groups. However, under the current protocol of bladder preparation and daily marker-based x-ray image-guidance, population PTV margins were comparable between the two patient groups.     

Quantification of residual dose estimation error on log file-based patient dose calculation

PurposeThe log file-based patient dose estimation includes a residual dose estimation error caused by leaf miscalibration, which cannot be reflected on the estimated dose. The purpose of this study is to determine this residual dose estimation error.Methods and materialsModified log files for seven head-and-neck and prostate volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans simulating leaf miscalibration were generated by shifting both leaf banks (systematic leaf gap errors: ±2.0, ±1.0, and ±0.5 mm in opposite directions and systematic leaf shifts: ±1.0 mm in the same direction) using MATLAB-based (MathWorks, Natick, MA) in-house software. The generated modified and non-modified log files were imported back into the treatment planning system and recalculated. Subsequently, the generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) was quantified for the definition of the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risks.ResultsFor MLC leaves calibrated within ±0.5 mm, the quantified residual dose estimation errors that obtained from the slope of the linear regression of gEUD changes between non- and modified log file doses per leaf gap are in head-and-neck plans 1.32 ± 0.27% and 0.82 ± 0.17 Gy for PTV and spinal cord, respectively, and in prostate plans 1.22 ± 0.36%, 0.95 ± 0.14 Gy, and 0.45 ± 0.08 Gy for PTV, rectum, and bladder, respectively.ConclusionsIn this work, we determine the residual dose estimation errors for VMAT delivery using the log file-based patient dose calculation according to the MLC calibration accuracy.     

Application of an independent dose calculation software for estimating the impact of inter-fractional setup shifts in Helical Tomotherapy treatments

The purpose of this study is to validate the capability of in-house independent point dose calculation software to be used as a second check for Helical Tomotherapy treatment plans. The software performed its calculations in homogenous conditions (using the Cheese phantom, which is a cylindrical phantom with radius 15 cm and length 18 cm) using a factor-based algorithm. Fifty patients, who were treated for pelvic (10), prostate (14), lung (10), head & neck (12) and brain (4) cancers, were used. Based on the individual patient kVCT images and the pretreatment MVCT images for each treatment fraction, the corresponding daily patient setup shifts in the IEC-X, IEC-Y, and IEC-Z directions were registered. For each patient, the registered fractional setup shifts were grouped into systematic and random shifts. The average systematic dosimetric variations showed small dose deviation for the different cancer types (1.0%–3.0%) compared to the planned dose. Of the fifty patients, only three had percent differences larger than 5%. The average random dosimetric variations showed relatively small dose deviations (0.2%–1.1%) compared to the planned dose. None of the patients had percent differences larger than 5%. By examining the individual fractions of each patient, it is observed that only in 31 out of 1358 fractions the percent differences exceeded the border of 5%. These results indicate that the overall dosimetric impact from systematic and random variations is small and that the software is a capable platform for independent point dose validation for the Helical Tomotherapy modality.     

Prospective evaluation of the setup errors and its impact on safety margin for cervical cancer pelvic conformal radiotherapy

AimThe primary objective was to assess set-up errors (SE) and secondary objective was to determine optimal safety margin (SM)BackgroundTo evaluate the SE and its impact on the SM utilizing electronic portal imaging (EPI) for pelvic conformal radiotherapy.Material and methods20 cervical cancer patients were enrolled in this prospective study. Supine position with ankle and knee rest was used during CT simulation. The contouring was done using consensus guideline for intact uterus. 50 Gy in 25 fractions were delivered at the isocenter with ≥95% PTV coverage. Two orthogonal (Anterior and Lateral) digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) was constructed as a reference image. The pair of orthogonal [Anterior-Posterior and Right Lateral] single exposure EPIs during radiation was taken. The reference DRR and EPIs were compared for shifts, and SE was calculated in the X-axis, Y-axis, and Z-axis directions.Results320 images (40 DRRs and 280 EPIs) were assessed. The systematic error in the Z-axis (AP EPI), X-axis (AP EPI), and Y-axis (Lat EPI) ranged from -12.0 to 11.8 mm, -10.3 to 7.5 mm, and -8.50 to 9.70 mm, while the random error ranged from 1.60 to 6.15 mm, 0.59 to 4.93 mm, and 1.02 to –4.35 mm. The SM computed were 7.07, 6.36, and 7.79 mm in the Y-axis, X-axis, and Z-axis by Van Herk’s equation, and 6.0, 5.51, and 6.74 mm by Stroom’s equation.ConclusionThe computed SE helps defining SM, and it may differ between institutions. In our study, the calculated SM was approximately 8 mm in the Z-axis, 7 mm in X and Y axis for pelvic conformal radiotherapy.     

Principal dynamic mode analysis of action potential firing in a spider mechanoreceptor

The encoding of mechanical stimuli into action potentials in two types of spider mechanoreceptor neurons is modeled by use of the principal dynamic modes (PDM) methodology. The PDM model is equivalent to the general Wiener–Bose model and consists of a minimum set of linear dynamic filters (PDMs), followed by a multivariate static nonlinearity and a threshold function. The PDMs are obtained by performing eigen-decomposition of a matrix constructed using the first-order and second-order Volterra kernels of the system, which are estimated by means of the Laguerre expansion technique, utilizing measurements of pseudorandom mechanical stimulation (input signal) and the resulting action potentials (output signal). The static nonlinearity, which can be viewed as a measure of the probability of action potential firing as a function of the PDM output values, is computed as the locus of points of the latter that correspond to output action potentials. The performance of the model is assessed by computing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, akin to the ones used in decision theory and quantified by computing the area under the ROC curve. Three PDMs are revealed by the analysis. The first PDM exhibits a high-pass characteristic, illustrating the importance of the velocity of slit displacement in the generation of action potentials at the mechanoreceptor output, while the second and third PDMs exhibit band-pass and low-pass characteristics, respectively. The corresponding three-input nonlinearity exhibits asymmetric behavior with respect to its arguments, suggesting directional dependence of the mechanoreceptor response on the mechanical stimulation and the PDM outputs, in agreement to our findings from a previous study (Ann Biomed Eng 27:391–402, 1999). Differences between the Type A and B neurons are observed in the zeroth-order Volterra kernels (related to the average firing), as well as in the magnitudes of the second and third PDMs that perform band-pass and low-pass processing of the input signal, respectively.     

Effect of accounting for interfractional CTV shape variations in PTV margins on prostate cancer radiation treatment plans

PurposeThe aim of this study was to account for interfractional clinical target volume (CTV) shape variation and apply this to the planning target volume (PTV) margin for prostate cancer radiation treatment plans.MethodsInterfractional CTV shape variations were estimated from weekly cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images using statistical point distribution models. The interfractional CTV shape variation was taken into account in the van Herk’s margin formula. The PTV margins without and with the CTV shape variation, i.e., standard (PTV_ori) and new (PTV_shape) margins, were applied to 10 clinical cases that had weekly CBCT images acquired during their treatment sessions. Each patient was replanned for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk CTVs, using both margins. The dose indices (D98 and V70) of treatment plans with the two margins were compared on weekly pseudo-planning computed tomography (PCT) images, which were defined as PCT images registered using a deformable image registration technique with weekly CBCT images, including contours of the CTV, rectum, and bladder.ResultsThe percentage of treatment fractions of patients who received CTV D98 greater than 95% of a prescribed dose increased from 80.3 (PTV_ori) to 81.8% (PTV_shape) for low-risk CTVs, 78.8 (PTV_ori) to 87.9% (PTV_shape) for intermediate-risk CTVs, and 80.3 (PTV_ori) to 87.9% (PTV_shape) for high-risk CTVs. In most cases, the dose indices of the rectum and bladder were acceptable in clinical practice.ConclusionThe results of this study suggest that interfractional CTV shape variations should be taken into account when determining PTV margins to increase CTV coverages.     

人体颈椎松质骨显微结构和力学性能的区域性差异研究

目的:探讨人体脊柱松质骨骨骼显微结构和力学性能的区域性差异,为松质骨三维结构采样部位的选取提供参考。方法:显微CT扫描6块颈6椎体标本获得三维图像,依据椎体内解剖位置的不同,将松质骨划分为6个位置组:外侧、内侧、腹侧、背侧、头侧和尾侧。利用显微结构参数骨体积分数(Bone volume to tissue volume,BV/TV)、骨表面积和骨体积的比值(Bone surface to bone volume,BS/BV)、骨小梁数量(Trabecular number,Tb.N)、骨小梁厚度(Trabecular thickness,Tb.Th)、骨小梁分离度(Trabecular separation,Tb.Sp)和个体化骨小梁分割方法(Individual trabeculae segmentation,ITS)分析6个位置组内松质骨显微结构,并利用有限元分析,获得6个位置组内松质骨的力学性能参数表观弹性模量和表观剪切模量。分别两两对比外侧和内侧,腹侧和背侧,头侧和尾侧松质骨的显微结构参数(BV/TV、BS/BV、Tb.N、Tb.Th、Tb.Sp和个体化骨小梁分割得到的参数)和力学性能参数(表观弹性模量和表观剪切模量)。结果:头侧和尾侧的主要显微结构参数BV/TV、Tb.Th、Tb.N等和表观弹性模量均存在显著差异(P0.05)。腹侧和背侧、内侧和外侧的主要显微结构参数BV/TV、Tb.Th、Tb.N等无显著差异。外侧和内侧的表观弹性模量在非主方向即内外方向和腹背放上上存在显著差异(P0.05),在主方向即头尾上无显著差异。结论:在实验中采集椎体松质骨样本以及临床上利用高分辨率CT分析椎体松质骨结构时,感兴趣区域要同时涵盖头侧和尾侧。     

Association of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Gene Val66Met Polymorphism with Primary Dysmenorrhea

Primary dysmenorrhea (PDM), the most prevalent menstrual cycle-related problem in women of reproductive age, is associated with negative moods. Whether the menstrual pain and negative moods have a genetic basis remains unknown. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) plays a key role in the production of central sensitization and contributes to chronic pain conditions. BDNF has also been implicated in stress-related mood disorders. We screened and genotyped the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism (rs6265) in 99 Taiwanese (Asian) PDMs (20–30 years old) and 101 age-matched healthy female controls. We found that there was a significantly higher frequency of the Met allele of the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism in the PDM group. Furthermore, BDNF Met/Met homozygosity had a significantly stronger association with PDM compared with Val carrier status. Subsequent behavioral/hormonal assessments of sub-groups (PDMs = 78, controls = 81; eligible for longitudinal multimodal neuroimaging battery studies) revealed that the BDNF Met/Met homozygous PDMs exhibited a higher menstrual pain score (sensory dimension) and a more anxious mood than the Val carrier PDMs during the menstrual phase. Although preliminary, our study suggests that the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism is associated with PDM in Taiwanese (Asian) people, and BDNF Met/Met homozygosity may be associated with an increased risk of PDM. Our data also suggest the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism as a possible regulator of menstrual pain and pain-related emotions in PDM. Absence of thermal hypersensitivity may connote an ethnic attribution. The presentation of our findings calls for further genetic and neuroscientific investigations of PDM.     

Evaluation of set-up errors in head and neck radiotherapy using electronic portal imaging

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to evaluate three-dimensional (3D) set-up errors and propose optimum margins for planning target volume (PTV) coverage in head and neck radiotherapy.MethodsThirty-five patients were included in the study. The total number of portal images studied was 632. Population systematic (Σ) and random (σ) errors for the patients with head and neck cancer were evaluated based on the portal images in the caudocranial longitudinal (CC) and left-right lateral (LR) direction measured in the anterior-posterior (AP) field, as well as from the images in the caudocranial longitudinal (CC) and dorsoventral lateral (DV) direction measured in the lateral (LAT) field. The values for the clinical-to-planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margins were calculated using ICRU Report 62 recommendations, along with Stroom's and van Herk's formulae.ResultsThe standard deviations of systematic set-up errors (Σ) ranged from 1.51 to 1.93 mm while the standard deviations of random set-up (σ) errors fell in between 1.77 and 1.86 mm. The mean 3D vector length of displacement was 2.66 mm. PTV margins calculated according to ICRU, Stroom's and van Herk's models were comprised between 1.95 and 6.16 mm in the three acquisition directions.Discussion and conclusionsBased on our results we can conclude that a 6-mm extension of CTV to PTV margin, as the lower limit, is enough to ensure that 90% of the patients treated for head and neck cancer will receive a minimum cumulative CTV dose greater than or equal to 95% of the prescribed dose.     

Performance of the irregular surface compensator compared with four-field box and intensity modulated radiation therapy for gynecologic cancer

PurposeA retrospective planning study was undertaken to evaluate the dosimetric advantages of the irregular surface compensator (ISC) technique, a forward planning technique with electronic compensation algorithm available on Varian Eclipse treatment planning system. This was extensively compared to the conventional four-field box (4FB) and intensity modulated radiation therapy using 5 fields (IMRT5F) on gynecologic cancer patients.MethodsTwenty-two patients were enrolled. The prescribed dose was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions to the primary target including pelvic lymph nodes. 4FB treatment plans were generated, then fluence of anterior and posterior fields were modified to generate ISC plans. IMRT5F were inversely optimized with equally spaced five coplanar fields. Dose-volume parameters were evaluated for the comparison of three planning techniques. The MU and delivery time were also estimated.ResultsIn terms of target coverage, the conformity and homogeneity index of ISC (1.67 and 1.03, respectively) were superior to those of 4FB (2.43 and 1.06, respectively) but slightly inferior to those of IMRT5F (1.10 and 1.02, respectively). ISC also illustrated an overall improvement in normal organ saving. Compared to 4FB, the mean dose of the rectum was reduced by about 4.0–5.0 Gy with ISC and IMRT5F. The volume receiving large doses was reduced for bladder with statistical significance with ISC and more with IMRT5F relative to 4FB. The mean number of MU per fraction were 200.86 (4FB), 446.09 (ISC) and 895.59 (IMRT5F).ConclusionThe ISC technique has the superior target coverage and healthy tissue sparing in comparison with conventional 4FB and comparable normal organ saving compared to IMRT5F. The ISC can be an available option for gynecologic radiotherapy.     

Determination of optimal planning target volume margins in patients with gynecological cancer

PurposeTo define optimal planning target volume (PTV) margins for intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) ± knee-heel support (KHS) in patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy.MethodsComputed tomography (CT) scans ± KHS of 10 patients were taken before and at 3rd and 5th week of treatment, fused and compared with initial IMRT plans.ResultsA PTV margin of 15 mm in anteroposterior (AP) and superoinferior (SI) directions and 5 mm in lateral directions were found to be adequate without any difference between ± KHS except for the SI shifts in CTV-primary at the 3rd week. Five mm margin for iliac CTV was found to be inadequate in 10–20% of patients in SI directions however when 7 mm margin was given for iliac PTV, it was found to be adequate. For presacral CTV, it was found that the most striking shift of the target volume was in the direction of AP. KHS caused significantly less volume of rectum and bladder in the treated volume.ConclusionsPTV margin of 15 mm in SI and AP, and 5 mm in lateral directions for CTV-primary were found to be adequate. A minimum of 7 mm PTV margin should be given to iliac CTV. The remarkable shifting in presacral CTV was believed to be due to the unforeseen hip malposition of obese patients. The KHS seems not to provide additional beneficial effect in decreasing the shifts both in CTV-primary and lymphatic, however it may have a beneficial effect of decreasing the OAR volume in PTV margins.     

Real-time measurement of ICD lead motion during stereotactic body radiotherapy of ventricular tachycardia

BackgroundHere we aimed to evaluate the respiratory and cardiac-induced motion of a ICD lead used as surrogate in the heart during stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of ventricular tachycardia (VT). Data provides insight regarding motion and motion variations during treatment.Materials and methodsWe analyzed the log files of surrogate motion during SBRT of ventricular tachycardia performed in 20 patients. Evaluated parameters included the ICD lead motion amplitudes; intrafraction amplitude variability; correlation error between the ICD lead and external markers; and margin expansion in the superior-inferior (SI), latero-lateral (LL), and anterior-posterior (AP) directions to cover 90% or 95% of all amplitudes.ResultsIn the SI, LL, and AP directions, respectively, the mean motion amplitudes were 5.0 ± 2.6, 3.4. ± 1.9, and 3.1 ± 1.6 mm. The mean intrafraction amplitude variability was 2.6 ± 0.9, 1.9 ± 1.3, and 1.6 ± 0.8 mm in the SI, LL, and AP directions, respectively. The margins required to cover 95% of ICD lead motion amplitudes were 9.5, 6.7, and 5.5 mm in the SI, LL, and AP directions, respectively. The mean correlation error was 2.2 ± 0.9 mm.ConclusionsData from online tracking indicated motion irregularities and correlation errors, necessitating an increased CTV-PTV margin of 3 mm. In 35% of cases, the motion variability exceeded 3 mm in one or more directions. We recommend verifying the correlation between CTV and surrogate individually for every patient, especially for targets with posterobasal localization where we observed the highest difference between the lead and CTV motion.     

Assessment of intra-fraction motion during automated linac-based SRS treatment delivery with an open face mask system

Purpose/objectiveTo evaluate intra-fraction target shift during automated mono-isocentric linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery with open-face mask system and optical real-time tracking.Materials/methodsNinety-five patients were treated using automated linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery in 1–5 fractions with single isocenter for a total of 195 fractions. During treatment, patient positioning was tracked real-time with optical surface guidance and immobilized with a rigid open-face mask. Patients were re-positioned if optical surface guidance error exceeded 1 mm magnitude or 1°. Translational and rotational intra-fractional changes were determined by post-treatment CBCT matched to the planning CT. Target specific error was calculated by translation and rotation matrices applied to isocenter and target spatial coordinates.ResultsFor 132 fractions with isocenter within a single target, the median shift magnitude was 0.40 mm with a maximum shift of 1.17 mm. A total of 398 targets treated for plans having multiple or single targets that lied outside isocenter, resulted in a median shift magnitude of 0.46 mm, with median translational shifts of 0.20 mm and 0.20° rotational shifts. A 1 mm PTV margin was insufficient in 18% of targets at a distance greater than 6 cm away from isocenter, but sufficient for 96% of targets within 6 cm.ConclusionsThe findings of this study support 1 mm PTV expansion due to intra-fraction motion to ensure target coverage for plans with isocenter placement less than 6 cm away from the targets.     

Evaluation of the ability of three commercially available dosimeters to detect systematic delivery errors in step-and-shoot IMRT plans

BackgroundThere is limited data on error detectability for step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiotherapy (sIMRT) plans, despite significant work on dynamic methods. However, sIMRT treatments have an ongoing role in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate variations in the sensitivity of three patient-specific quality assurance (QA) devices to systematic delivery errors in sIMRT plans.Materials and methodsFour clinical sIMRT plans (prostate and head and neck) were edited to introduce errors in: Multi-Leaf Collimator (MLC) position (increasing field size, leaf pairs offset (1–3 mm) in opposite directions; and field shift, all leaves offset (1–3 mm) in one direction); collimator rotation (1–3 degrees) and gantry rotation (0.5–2 degrees). The total dose for each plan was measured using an ArcCHECK diode array. Each field, excluding those with gantry offsets, was also measured using an Electronic Portal Imager and a MatriXX Evolution 2D ionisation chamber array. 132 plans (858 fields) were delivered, producing 572 measured dose distributions. Measured doses were compared to calculated doses for the no-error plan using Gamma analysis with 3%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm, and 2%/2 mm criteria (1716 analyses).ResultsGenerally, pass rates decreased with increasing errors and/or stricter gamma criteria. Pass rate variations with detector and plan type were also observed. For a 3%/3 mm gamma criteria, none of the devices could reliably detect 1 mm MLC position errors or 1 degree collimator rotation errors.ConclusionsThis work has highlighted the need to adapt QA based on treatment plan type and the need for detector specific assessment criteria to detect clinically significant errors.     

Comparative analysis of image guidance in two institutions for prostate cancer patients

Aim/Background

The analysis of systematic and random errors obtained from the pooled data on inter-fraction prostate motion during radiation therapy in two institutions.

Materials and methods

Data of 6085 observations for 216 prostate cancer patients treated on tomotherapy units in two institutions of position correction shifts obtained by co-registration of planning and daily CT studies were investigated. Three independent variables: patient position (supine or prone), target (prostate or prostate bed), and imaging mode (normal or coarse) were analyzed. Systematic and random errors were evaluated and used to calculate the margins for different options of referencing based on the position corrections observed with one, three, or five imaging sessions.

Results

Statistical analysis showed that only the difference between normal and coarse modes of imaging was significant, which allowed to merge the supine and prone position sub-groups as well as the prostate and prostate bed patients. In the normal and coarse imaging groups, the margins calculated using systematic and random errors in the medio-lateral and cranio-caudal directions (5.5 mm and 4.5 mm, respectively) were similar, but significantly different (5.3 mm for the normal mode and 7.1 mm for the coarse mode) in the anterio-posterior direction. The reference scheme based on the first three fractions (R3) was found to be the optimal one.

Conclusions

The R3 reference scheme effectively reduced systematic and random errors. Larger margins in the anterio-posterior direction should be used during prostate treatment on the tomotherapy unit, as coarse imaging mode is chosen in order to reduce imaging time and dose.