A new split arc VMAT technique for lymph node positive breast cancer

PurposeTo investigate different volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) field designs for lymph node positive breast cancer patients when compared to conventional static fields and standard VMAT designs.MethodsNineteen breast cancer patients with lymph node involvement (eleven left and eight right sided) were retrospectively analyzed with different arc designs. Proposed split arc designs with total rotations of 2 × 190° and 2 × 240° were compared to conventional field in field (FinF) and previously published non-split arc techniques with the same amount of total rotations.ResultsAll VMAT plans were superior in dose conformity, when compared to the FinF plans. Split arc design decreased significantly ipsilateral lung dose and heart V5Gy for both left and right sided cases, when compared to non-split VMAT designs. For left sided cases no significant differences were seen in contralateral lung mean dose or V5Gy between different VMAT designs. For right sided cases the contralateral lung dose V5Gy was significantly higher in split VMAT group, when compared to non-split VMAT designs. The contralateral breast dose V5Gy increased significantly for split VMAT plans for both sides, when compared to non-split VMAT designs or FinF plans.ConclusionsThe proposed split VMAT technique was shown to be superior to previously published non-split VMAT and conventional FinF techniques significantly reducing dose to the ipsilateral lung and heart. However, this came with the expense of an increase in the dose to the contralateral breast and for right-sided cases to the contralateral lung.     

Is the lack of respiratory gating prejudicial for left breast TomoDirect treatments?

Background and purposeTomoDirect (TD) can only operate in free-breathing. The purpose of this study is to compare TD with breath-hold 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques for left breast treatments, and to determine if the lack of respiratory gating is a handicap for cardiac sparing.Materials and methods15 patients treated for left breast had two computed tomography simulation, in free breathing (FB) and in deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH). Four treatments were planned: TD-FB, 3DCRT-FB, 3DCRT-DIBH and IMRT-DIBH. Dose to PTV, heart, lungs, right breast and patient were compared.ResultsA slightly lower cardiac mean dose is found for 3DCRT-DIBH than for TD-FB group (1.99 Gy Vs 2.89 Gy, p = 0.0462), while no statistical difference is found for heart V₂₀. TD-FB plans show the best PTV dose homogeneity (0.053, p < 0.001) and the lowest left lung mean dose (5.16 Gy, p < 0.001). No major differences are found for the other organs.ConclusionsTomoDirect and breath-hold 3DCRT are complementary techniques for left breast treatments: for a minority of patients, respiratory gating is mandatory to lower cardiac dose; for the remaining majority of patients, TomoDirect achieves better PTV homogeneity and reduced left lung dose, with cardiac dose equivalent to 3DCRT-DIBH.     

Dosimetric evaluation of irregular surface compensator and intensity-modulated radiotherapy in breast radiotherapy

BackgroundThis dosimetric study aims to evaluate the dosimetric advantage of the irregular surface compensator (ISC) compared with the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).Materials and methodsTen patients with whole breast irradiation were planned with the ISC and IMRT techniques. Six different beam directions were selected for IMRT and ISC plans. The treatment plans were evaluated with respect to planning target coverage, dose homogeneity index (DHI) and organs at risk (OARs) sparing. Monitor units (MUs) and the delivery time were analysed for treatment efficiency.ResultsThe ISC technique provides a better coverage of the PTV and statistically significantly better homogeneity of the dose distribution. For the ipsilateral lung and heart, ISC and IMRT techniques deliver almost the same dose in all plans. However, MU counts and delivery time were significantly lower with the IMRT technique (p < 0.05).ConclusionFor breast radiotherapy, when the ISC method was compared to the IMRT method, ISC provided better dose distribution for the target.     

Static and rotational intensity modulated techniques for head-neck cancer radiotherapy: A planning comparison

PurposeTo compare helical Tomotherapy (HT), two volumetric-modulated arc techniques and conventional fixed-field intensity modulated techniques (S-IMRT) for head-neck (HN) cancers.Methods and materialsEighteen HN patients were considered. Four treatment plans were generated for each patient: HT, S-IMRT optimised with Eclipse treatment planning system and two volumetric techniques using Elekta–Oncentra approach (VMAT) and Varian-RapidArc (RA), using two full arcs. All techniques were optimised to simultaneously deliver 66Gy to PTV1 (GTV and enlarged nodes) and 54Gy to PTV2 (subclinical and electively treated nodes). Comparisons were assessed on several dosimetric parameters and, secondarily, on planned MUs and delivery time.ResultsConcerning PTV coverage, significantly better results were found for HT and RA. HT significantly improved the target coverage both compared to S-IMRT and VMAT. No significant differences were found between S-IMRT and volumetric techniques in terms of dose homogeneity. For OARs, all the techniques were able to satisfy all hard constraints; significantly better results were found for HT, especially in the intermediate dose range (15–30 Gy). S-IMRT reached a significantly better OARs sparing with respect to VMAT and RA. No significant differences were found for body mean dose, excepting higher values of V5–V10 for HT. A reduction of planned MUs and delivery treatment time was found with volumetric techniques.ConclusionsThe objectives of satisfying target coverage and sparing of critical structures were reached with all techniques. S-IMRT techniques were found more advantageous compared to RA and VMAT for OARs sparing. HT reached the best overall treatment plan quality.     

Integrated scoring approach to assess radiotherapy plan quality for breast cancer treatment

BackgroundProposal of an integrated scoring approach assessing the quality of different treatment techniques in a radiotherapy planning comparison. This scoring method incorporates all dosimetric indices of planning target volumes (PTVs) as well as organs at risk (OARs) and provides a single quantitative measure to select an ideal plan.Materials and methodsThe radiotherapy planning techniques compared were field-in-field (FinF), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), hybrid IMRT (H-IMRT), and hybrid VMAT (H-VMAT). These plans were generated for twenty-five locally advanced left-sided breast cancer patients. The PTVs were prescribed a hypofractionation dose of 40.5 Gy in 15 fractions. The integrated score for each planning technique was calculated using the proposed formula.ResultsAn integrated score value that is close to zero indicates a superior plan. The integrated score that incorporates all dosimetric indices (PTVs and OARs) were 1.37, 1.64, 1.72, 1.18, and 1.24 for FinF, IMRT, VMAT, H-IMRT, and H-VMAT plans, respectively.ConclusionThe proposed integrated scoring approach is scientific to select a better plan and flexible to incorporate the patient-specific clinical demands. This simple tool is useful to quantify the treatment techniques and able to differentiate the acceptable and unacceptable plans.     

Volumetric modulated arc therapy for synchronous bilateral whole breast irradiation – A case study

PurposeThe treatment planning of bilateral breast irradiation (BBI) is a challenging task. The overlapping of tangential fields is usually unavoidable without compromising the target coverage. The purpose of this study was to investigate the technical feasibility and benefits of a single isocentre volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in BBI.Methods and materialsTwo women with bilateral breast cancer were included in this case study. The first patient (Pat#1) underwent a bilateral breast-conserving surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy. The second patient (Pat#2) underwent a bilateral ablation and axillary lymph node dissection. Planning target volumes (PTV) and organs at risk were delineated on CT images. VMAT plans were created with four (two for both sides, Pat#1) or two (one for each breast, Pat#2) separate VMAT fields. Subsequently, traditional tangential field plans were generated for each patient and the dosimetric parameters were compared.ResultsThe treatment times of the patients with VMAT were less than 15 min with daily CBCT imaging. When compared to the standard tangential field technique, the VMAT plans improved the PTV dose coverage and dose homogeneity with improved sparing of lungs and heart. With traditional field arrangement, the overlapping of the tangential fields was inevitable without significantly compromising the target coverage, whereas with VMAT the hotspots were avoided. The patients were treated with the VMAT technique and no acute skin toxicity was observed with either of the patients.ConclusionsA single isocentre VMAT technique has been implemented clinically for BBI. With the VMAT techniques, the dose delivery was quick and the hotspots in the field overlapping areas were avoided. The PTV dose coverage was superior in VMAT plans when compared with conventional tangential technique plans.     

Is IMAT the ultimate evolution of conformal radiotherapy? Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for oropharyngeal cancer in a planning study

BackgroundIntensity Modulated Arc Therapy (IMAT) can be planned and delivered via several techniques. Advanced Radiotherapy (ARTORL) is a prospective study that aims to evaluate the treatment costs and clinical aspects of implementing these IMAT techniques for head and neck cancers. In this context, we evaluated the potential dosimetric gain of Helical Tomotherapy (TomoTherapy, Accuray, HT) versus VMAT (Rapid'Arc^®, Varian Medical System, RA) for oropharyngeal cancer (OC).Material and methodsThirty patients were selected from our database in whom bilateral neck irradiation and treatment to the primary were indicated. Each patient was planned twice using both HT and RA planning systems using a simultaneous integrated boost approach. For the planning target volumes (PTV) and organs at risk, ICRU 83 reporting guidelines were followed. RA and HT plans were compared using paired Student's t-test.ResultsRA and HT produced plans with a good coverage of PTVs and acceptable sparing of OARs. Although some dosimetric differences were statistically significant, they remained small. However, the near maximal dose to the PRV of spinal cord and brain stem was lower with HT. Regarding normal tissue, HT increased the volume irradiated at doses between 4 and 20 Gy compared to RA.ConclusionIn OC, HT and RA showed similar dosimetric results. They represent the maximum gains obtained with photon beams. The medicoeconomic evaluation of our study is ongoing and may reveal differences between these techniques in terms of MU number, fraction time, and clinical evaluation.     

Monte Carlo investigation on the effect of air gap under bolus in post-mastectomy radiotherapy

ObjectivesTo investigate the dosimetric effect of air gaps under bolus on skin dose for left-sided post-mastectomy radiotherapy with loco regional involvement.MethodsEight patients were planned retrospectively with volume modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and conventional static Field-in-Field (FinF) methods. Three different setups were applied for the 5-mm bolus over the chest wall having 0, 5 or 10 mm air gap under the bolus. The dose calculation was performed using Monte Carlo (MC) simulation. In addition, Analytic Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) was used to demonstrate the differences observed in clinical setting.ResultsThe investigated air gaps under the bolus had minimal effect on surface dose for FinF plans (relative difference ≤ 2.6%), whereas for VMAT plans the surface dose decreased 13.6% when compared to the case with no air gap. In both FinF and VMAT, the largest differences between AAA and MC were seen at the surface where AAA underestimated the dose by 1.5 Gy (p < 0.05) on average; while the dose in the target volume excluding the surface was relatively similar being on average 0.3 Gy (p > 0.05) larger with AAA than with MC calculations.ConclusionsThe surface dose was significantly lower with VMAT technique than with FinF technique. Possible air gaps under the bolus reduced the surface dose significantly further for VMAT but not for FinF treatments, which may have clinical impact on recurrence rate. AAA was shown to underestimate the surface dose when compared to MC calculation.     

Comparison of dose distributions and organs at risk (OAR) doses in conventional tangential technique (CTT) and IMRT plans with different numbers of beam in left-sided breast cancer

Aim

Our aim was to improve dose distribution to the left breast and to determine the dose received by the ipsilateral lung, heart, contralateral lung and contralateral breast during primary left-sided breast irradiation by using intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques compared to conventional tangential techniques (CTT). At the same time, different beams of IMRT plans were compared to each other in respect to CI, HI and organs at risk (OAR) dose.

Background

Conventional early breast cancer treatment consists of lumpectomy followed by whole breast radiation therapy. CTT is a traditional method used for whole breast radiotherapy and includes standard wedged tangents (two opposed wedged tangential photon beams). The IMRT technique has been widely used for many treatment sites, allowing both improved sparing of normal tissues and more conformal dose distributions. IMRT is a new technique for whole breast radiotherapy. IMRT is used to improve conformity and homogeneity and used to reduce OAR doses.

Materials and methods

Thirty patients with left-sided breast carcinoma were treated between 2005 and 2008 using 6, 18 or mixed 6/18 MV photons for primary breast irradiation following breast conserving surgery (BCS). The clinical target volume [CTV] was contoured as a target volume and the contralateral breast, ipsilateral lung, contralateral lung and heart tissues as organs at risk (OAR). IMRT with seven beams (IMRT7), nine beams (IMRT9) and 11 beams (IMRT11) plans were developed and compared with CTT and among each other. The conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), and doses to OAR were compared to each other.

Results

All of IMRT plans significantly improved CI (CTT: 0.76; IMRT7: 0.84; IMRT9: 0.84; IMRT11: 0.85), HI (CTT: 1.16; IMRT7: 1.12; IMRT9: 1.11; IMRT11: 1.11), volume of the ipsilateral lung receiving more than 20 Gy (>V_20 Gy) (CTT: 14.6; IMRT7: 9.08; IMRT9: 8.10; IMRT11: 8.60), and volume of the heart receiving more than 30 Gy (>V_30 Gy) (CTT: 6.7; IMRT7: 4.04; IMRT9: 2.80; IMRT11: 2.98) compared to CTT. All IMRT plans were found to significantly decrease >V_20 Gy and >V_30 Gy volumes compared to conformal plans. But IMRT plans increased the volume of OAR receiving low dose radiotherapy: volume of contralateral lung receiving 5 and 10 Gy (CTT: 0.0–0.0; IMRT7: 19.0–0.7; IMRT9: 17.2–0.66; IMRT11: 18.7–0.58, respectively) and volume of contralateral breast receiving 10 Gy (CTT: 0.03; IMRT7: 0.38; IMRT9: 0.60; IMRT11: 0.68). The differences among IMRT plans with increased number of beams were not statistically significant.

Conclusion

IMRT significantly improved conformity and homogeneity index for plans. Heart and lung volumes receiving high doses were decreased, but OAR receiving low doses was increased.     

Lateral wedge with medial only cardiac shielding (LEMONADE) technique in left chest wall adjuvant radiotherapy

BackgroundThis dosimetric study compared lateral wedge with medial only cardiac shielding (LEMONADE) technique, for left chest wall (LCW) irradiation against three other commonly used techniques.Materials and methodsDosimetric parameters of 22 consecutive LBC patients treated using the P1 (LEMONADE technique) were compared with 3 other virtually reconstructed plans : no cardiac shielding with paired wedges; P2 (paired wedges and medial only Y-direction shielding) and P3 (paired wedges and bilateral Y-direction shielding).ResultsP1 showed better target volume (TV) coverage with the mean 90% isodose coverage of 85.59% ± 5.44 compared to 78.90% ± 8.59 and 74.22% ± 9.50 for P2 and P3, respectively. Compared to no cardiac shielding, for a 4.65% drop in TV coverage the V26Gy of heart dropped from 6.68% to a negligible 0.85% for P1. TV receiving < 30Gy is also significantly lesser for P1 compared to P2 and P3 (5.42% vs 10.64% and 15.8%), whilst there is a small difference of 2.75% between no cardiac shielding and P1.ConclusionWith the improvement in BC survival rate, cardiac toxicity associated with adjuvant irradiation for LBC is a major concern. P1 (LEMONADE) technique has a good compromise between cardiac sparing and target coverage and should suffice for most LCW irradiations. Furthermore, the LEMONADE technique is a simple, reproducible and involves fast planning for cardiac sparing, which is ideal for under-resourced departments with heavy workload.     

Segmented photon beams technique for irradiation of postmastectomy patients

AimTo present the segmented photon beams technique (SPBT) for irradiation of postmastectomy patients.BackgroundIn majority of techniques for irradiation of posmastectomy patients, a few adjacent photon or electron beams were usually implemented in order to encompass different parts of the target. In the presented SPBT technique, the radiotherapy plan consists of 6 isocentric photon beams and the area CTV includes both the chest wall and the supraclavicular area. This makes it possible to provide a uniform dose to the CTV with no hot and cold points and enables the determination of doses for the entire volume of critical organs.Methods and materialThe treatment forward-IMRT plan comprises six isocentric 4 and 15 MV photon beams. Modulation of the dose distribution for each field was obtained by applying three segments on average. The total dose of 45 Gy was administered in 20 fractions. Dose distributions in target volume and organs at risk were evaluated for 70 randomly chosen patients.ResultsOn average, 94.8% of the CTV volume received doses within 95–107% of the prescribed dose. The average volume of the heart receiving a dose of 30 Gy and lager was 2% for patients with left breast cancer. The average dose to the lung on the irradiation side was always lower than 15.5 Gy and the average V20 Gy was below 35.5%.ConclusionsThe SPBT complies with requirements for high dose homogeneity within the target volume and satisfactory level of sparing of organs at risk.     

CyberKnife versus multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy for accelerated partial breast irradiation: a dosimetrical assessment with focus on organs at risk

BackgroundThe purpose of the study was to dosimetrically compare multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIBT) and stereotactic radiotherapy with CyberKnife (CK) for accelerated partial breast irradiation with special focus on dose to organs at risk (OARs).Materials and methodsTreatment plans of thirty-one patients treated with MIBT were selected and additional CK plans were created on the same CT images. The OARs included ipsilateral non-target and contralateral breast, ipsilateral and contralateral lung, skin, ribs, and heart for left sided cases. The fractionation was identical (4 × 6.25 Gy). Dose-volume parameters were calculated for both techniques and compared.ResultsThe D90 of the PTV for MIBT and CK were similar (102.4% vs. 103.6%, p = 0.0654), but in COIN the MIBT achieved lower value (0.75 vs. 0.91, p < 0.001). Regarding the V100 parameter of non-target breast CK performed slightly better than MIBT (V100: 1.1% vs. 1.6%), but for V90, V50 and V25 MIBT resulted in less dose. Every examined parameter of ipsilateral lung, skin, ribs and contralateral lung was significantly smaller for MIBT than for CK. Protection of the heart was slightly better with MIBT, but only the difference of D2cm³ was statistically significant (17.3% vs. 20.4%, p = 0.0311). There were no significant differences among the dose-volume parameters of the contralateral breast.ConclusionThe target volume can be properly irradiated by both techniques with high conformity and similar dose to the OARs. MIBT provides more advantageous plans than CK, except for dose conformity and the dosimetry of the heart and contralateral breast. More studies are needed to analyze whether these dosimetrical findings have clinical significance.     

A comparative study evaluating the dose volume parameters in 3D conformal radiation of left sided whole breast irradiation including regional lymphnodes — a need of resource constrained countries

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to compare four 3D conformal radiation techniques in treatment of left breast cancer patients.Materials and methodsRadiation was planned for 20 patients to the left breast and regional lymph nodes using four techniques: partially wide tangents, photon-photon mix, photon-electron mix and 30/70 photon-electron mix. All plans were evaluated for internal mammary nodes (IMN) coverage, hotspot and normal tissue constraints.ResultThe 85% of planning target volume (PTV) coverage was lesser for upper IMN than the lower IMN (below the lower border of the clavicular head) for all four techniques. The lower IMN coverage was better for partially wide tangent (80.46%) and photon-photon mix (88.88%). The lowest value of hotspot was seen in the partially wide tangent technique (112.69% ± 1.92). Hotspot is unacceptably high in both photon-electron mix and 30/70 photon-electron mix (> 120%). Left lung mean dose for all techniques on a pair-wise comparison showed no statistical difference. Left lung V20 values for partially wide tangent was 37.56% ± 8.17 and for photon-photon mix it was 40.49% ± 3.36. The mean heart dose with partially wide tangent was 9.43 ± 3.15 Gy and with photon-photon mix it was 10.10 ± 2.70 Gy. The mean heart dose for photon-electron mix was 7.56 ± 1.95 Gy and for 30/70 photon-electron mix it was 7.98 ± 2.16 Gy.ConclusionNo single technique satisfies all the criteria. The decision should be made on a case-by-case basis, considering the anatomy of the patient, availability of electron facilities and setup accuracy and reproducibility.     

Examination of the dose distribution of volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy using a high-definition multi-leaf collimator for breast cancer patients with irradiated regional lymph nodes

BackgroundA high-definition multi-leaf collimator (HD-MLC) with 5- and 10-mm fine MLCs is useful for radiotherapy. However, it is difficult to irradiate the mammary gland and supraclavicular region using a HD-MLC because of the narrow field of volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT). Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the dose distribution of the VMAT dose using a HD-MLC in 15 patients with left breast cancer undergoing postoperative irradiation of breast and regional lymph nodes, including the internal mammary node.Materials and methodsThe following four plans were generated: three-arc VMAT using HD-MLC (HD-VMAT), two tangential arcs and one-arc VMAT using HD-MLC (tHD-VMAT), three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) using HD-MLC, and two-arc VMAT using the Millennium 120-leaf MLC (M-VMAT). We assessed the doses to the target volume and organs at risk.ResultsThe target dose distributions were higher for HD-VMAT than 3DCRT. There were no significant differences in the heart mean dose (D_mean) or lung volume receiving 20 Gy (V20 Gy) between HD-VMAT and 3DCRT. The heart D_mean and lung V20 Gy of tHD-VMAT were higher than those of HD-VMAT, and the heart D_mean of M-VMAT was higher than that of HD-VMAT. However, the target doses of tHD-VMAT, M-VMAT, and HD-VMAT were equivalent.ConclusionsIn cases of the mammary gland and regional lymph node irradiation, including the internal mammary node in patients with left breast cancer, HD-VMAT was not inferior to M-VMAT and provided a better dose distribution to the target volume and organs at risk compared with 3DCRT and tHD-VMAT.     

The evaluation of the feasibility of carotid sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy technique for comprehensive breast irradiation

PurposeTo investigate the feasibility of carotid sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy (CS-IMRT) to minimize the radiation dose to carotid arteries for comprehensive irradiation of breast cancer patients who have risk factors for atherosclerosis. The dose distribution of CS-IMRT technique and the conventional irradiation technique were also compared.Patients and methodsTen patients who were previously treated with comprehensive three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) were selected. DICOM data were used to contour the carotid artery and to create the virtual CS-IMRT plans for each patient. 3DCRT and CS-IMRT plans were compared in terms of conformity index, homogeneity index, and the doses to organ at risk and carotid arteries.ResultsThe homogeneity and conformity indices were better with CS-IMRT plans compared to 3DCRT plan. The homogeneity index was 1.13 vs 1.11 (p = 0.007) for 3DCRT and CS-IMRT and the conformity index was 0.96 vs 0.97 (p = 0.006) for 3DCRT and CS-IMRT. The radiation dose to the carotid arteries were reduced by applying CS-IMRT without compromising the target volume coverage. When the carotid artery was considered as organ at risk for CS-IMRT planning, the median of V50 was decreased to 0% from 12.5% compared to 3DCRT plans (p = 0.017). The median of the maximum dose to the carotid artery was decreased under 50 Gy with CS-IMRT.ConclusionsCS-IMRT can significantly reduce the unnecessary radiation dose to the carotid arteries compared with conventional 3DCRT technique while maintaining target volume coverage. CS-IMRT technique can be considered for breast cancer patient with high risk of atherosclerosis.     

Deep inspiration breath hold in post-operative radiotherapy for right breast cancer: a retrospective analysis

BackgroundThe aim of our study is to determine whether deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is effective for reducing exposure of the heart, left coronary artery (LAD) and both lungs in right breast radiotherapy.Materials and methodsWe have analyzed 10 consecutive patients with right-sided breast cancer (BC), simulated during free breathing (FB) and in DIBH modality. For all patients we contoured breast PTV and organs at risk (right and left lungs, heart, LAD) on both CT scans (FB and DIBH). Finally, 5 patients were treated with IMRT and 5 with VMAT techniques.ResultsAll patients were able to end the treatments in DIBH modalities regardless of the longer treatment time in comparison to FB. The maximum and mean dose to the heart are lower in the DIBH modality. The mean values of the heart mean dose were 1.76 Gy in DIBH and 2.19 Gy in FB. The mean heart maximum dose in DIBH and FB were, respectively, 9.3 Gy and 11 Gy. Likewise, the maximum dose to the LAD is lower in DIBH; 2.57 Gy versus 3.56 Gy in FB. Noteworthy, 3 patients with hepatomegaly treated with the DIBH technique showed a higher ipsilateral lung dose than FB, but a decrease of liver dose.ConclusionWe report that the use of DIBH for right-sided BC allows the dose to the heart, LAD and to the liver to be reduced in case of hepatomegaly. This technique is well tolerated by patients, when adequately trained, and could be considered effective even in right sided BC.     

Voluntary breath-hold reduces dose to organs at risk in radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer

AimTo compare the dose to organs at risk with free breathing (FB) or voluntary breath-hold (VBH) during radiotherapy of patients with left sided breast cancer.BackgroundRadiotherapy reduces the risk of breast-cancer-specific mortality but the effects on other organs increase non-cancer-specific mortality. Radiation exposure to the heart, in particular in patients with left sided breast cancer, can be reduced by breath hold methods that increase the distance between the heart and the radiation field.Materials and MethodsThree-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) dose plans for the left breast and organs at risk including the heart, left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and ipsilateral lung were compared with FB and VBH in ten patients with left sided breast cancer.ResultsThe mean doses to the heart and LAD were reduced by 50.4 % (p < 0.001) and 58.8 % (p = 0.006), respectively, in VBH relative to FB. The mean dose to the ipsilateral lung was reduced by 13.8 % (p = 0.11) in VBH relative to FB. The planning target volume (PTV) coverage was at least 95 % in both FB and VBH (p = 0.78).ConclusionThe VBH technique significantly reduces the dose to organs at risk in 3D-CRT treatment plans of left sided breast cancer.