The top of the inserted-like domain of the integrin lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 beta subunit contacts the alpha subunit beta -propeller domain near beta-sheet 3

We find that monoclonal antibody YTA-1 recognizes an epitope formed by a combination of the integrin alpha(L) and beta(2) subunits of LFA-1. Using human/mouse chimeras of the alpha(L) and beta(2) subunits, we determined that YTA-1 binds to the predicted inserted (I)-like domain of the beta(2) subunit and the predicted beta-propeller domain of the alpha(L) subunit. Substitution into mouse LFA-1 of human residues Ser(302) and Arg(303) of the beta(2) subunit and Pro(78), Thr(79), Asp(80), Ile(365), and Asn(367) of the alpha(L) subunit is sufficient to completely reconstitute YTA-1 reactivity. Antibodies that bind to epitopes that are nearby in models of the I-like and beta-propeller domains compete with YTA-1 monoclonal antibody for binding. The predicted beta-propeller domain of integrin alpha subunits contains seven beta-sheets arranged like blades of a propeller around a pseudosymmetry axis. The antigenic residues cluster on the bottom of this domain in the 1-2 loop of blade 2, and on the side of the domain in beta-strand 4 of blade 3. The I domain is inserted between these blades on the top of the beta-propeller domain. The antigenic residues in the beta subunit localize to the top of the I-like domain near the putative Mg(2+) ion binding site. Thus, the I-like domain contacts the bottom or side of the beta-propeller domain near beta-sheets 2 and 3. YTA-1 preferentially reacts with activated LFA-1 and is a function-blocking antibody, suggesting that conformational movements occur near the interface it defines between the LFA-1 alpha and beta subunits.     

Structure of integrin alpha5beta1 in complex with fibronectin

The membrane-distal headpiece of integrins has evolved to specifically bind large extracellular protein ligands, but the molecular architecture of the resulting complexes has not been determined. We used molecular electron microscopy to determine the three-dimensional structure of the ligand-binding headpiece of integrin alpha5beta1 complexed with fragments of its physiological ligand fibronectin. The density map for the unliganded alpha5beta1 headpiece shows a 'closed' conformation similar to that seen in the alphaVbeta3 crystal structure. By contrast, binding to fibronectin induces an 'open' conformation with a dramatic, approximately 80 degrees change in the angle of the hybrid domain of the beta subunit relative to its I-like domain. The fibronectin fragment binds to the interface between the beta-propeller and I-like domains in the integrin headpiece through the RGD-containing module 10, but direct contact of the synergy-region-containing module 9 to integrin is not evident. This finding is corroborated by kinetic analysis of real-time binding data, which shows that the synergy site greatly enhances k(on) but has little effect on the stability or k(off) of the complex.     

Structural and functional studies with antibodies to the integrin beta 2 subunit. A model for the I-like domain

To establish a structure and function map of the beta2 integrin subunit, we mapped the epitopes of a panel of beta2 monoclonal antibodies including function-blocking, nonblocking, and activating antibodies using human/mouse beta2 subunit chimeras. Activating antibodies recognize the C-terminal half of the cysteine-rich region, residues 522-612. Antibodies that do not affect ligand binding map to residues 1-98 and residues 344-521. Monoclonal antibodies to epitopes within a predicted I-like domain (residues 104-341) strongly inhibit LFA-1-dependent adhesion. These function-blocking monoclonal antibodies were mapped to specific residues with human --> mouse knock-out or mouse --> human knock-in mutations. Combinatorial epitopes involving residues distant in the sequence provide support for a specific alignment between the beta-subunit and I domains that was used to construct a three-dimensional model. Antigenic residues 133, 332, and 339 are on the first and last predicted alpha-helices of the I-like domain, which are adjacent on its "front." Other antigenic residues in beta2 and in other integrin beta subunits are present on the front. No antigenic residues are present on the "back" of the domain, which is predicted to be in an interface with other domains, such as the alpha subunit beta-propeller domain. Most mutations in the beta2 subunit in leukocyte adhesion deficiency are predicted to be buried in the beta2 subunit I-like domain. Two long insertions are present relative to alpha-subunit I-domains. One is tied down to the back of the I-like domain by a disulfide bond. The other corresponds to the "specificity-determining loop" defined in beta1 and beta3 integrins and contains the antigenic residue Glu(175) in a disulfide-bonded loop located near the "top" of the domain.     

Folding and function of I domain-deleted Mac-1 and lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1

In those integrins that contain it, the I domain is a major ligand recognition site. The I domain is inserted between beta-sheets 2 and 3 of the predicted beta-propeller domain of the integrin alpha subunit. We deleted the I domain from the integrin alpha(M) and alpha(L) subunits to give I-less Mac-1 and lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1), respectively. The I-less alpha(M) and alpha(L) subunits were expressed in association with the wild-type beta(2) subunit on the surface of transfected cells and bound to all the monoclonal antibodies mapped to the putative beta-propeller and C-terminal regions of the alpha(M) and alpha(L) subunits, suggesting that the folding of these domains is independent of the I domain. I-less Mac-1 bound to the ligands iC3b and factor X, but this binding was reduced compared with wild-type Mac-1. In contrast, I-less Mac-1 did not bind to fibrinogen or denatured bovine serum albumin. Binding to iC3b and factor X by I-less Mac-1 was inhibited by the function-blocking antibody CBRM1/32, which binds to the beta-propeller domain of the alpha(M) subunit. I-less LFA-1 did not bind its ligands intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and -3. Thus, the I domain is not essential for the folding, heterodimer formation, and surface expression of Mac-1 and LFA-1 and is required for binding to some ligands, but not others.     

The selective regulation of alpha Vbeta 1 integrin expression is based on the hierarchical formation of alpha V-containing heterodimers

The integrin beta1 subunit can form a heterodimer with 12 different alpha subunits. According to the present model, the expression level of any alphabeta complex is regulated by the availability of the specific alpha subunit, whereas beta1 subunit is constantly present in a large excess. The expression of several heterodimers containing the alphaV subunit seems to be regulated by an identical mechanism. The fact that many cells express alphaVbeta1 heterodimer, and that this fibronectin/vitronectin receptor may be selectively regulated, compromises the present model of the regulation of beta1 and alphaV integrins. We have tried to solve this problem by assuming that distinct alphabeta heterodimers are formed with different tendency. To test the hypothesis, we analyzed WM-266-4 melanoma cells transfected with a cDNA construct coding for an intracellular single-chain anti-alphaV integrin antibody. We could see 70-80% reduction in the cell surface expression of alphaV subunit. However, the only one of the alphaV integrins reduced on the cell surface was alphaVbeta1. This suggests that the cell surface expression level of alphaVbeta1 is dependent on the number of alphaV subunits available after the formation of other alphaV-containing heterodimers. Thus, there seems to be a hierarchy in the complex formation between alphaV and its different beta-partners. These observations explain how alphaVbeta1 can be specifically regulated without concomitant changes in the expression of other alphaV or beta1 integrins.     

Crucial role of the specificity-determining loop of the integrin beta4 subunit in the binding of cells to laminin-5 and outside-in signal transduction

Within each hemidesmosome, alpha6beta4 integrin plays a crucial role in hemidesmosome assembly by binding to laminin-5 in the basement membrane zone of epithelial tissue. Recent analyses have implicated "specificity-determining loops" (SDLs) in the I-like domain of beta integrin in regulating ligand binding. Here, we investigated the function of an SDL-like motif within the extracellular I-like domain of beta4 integrin. We generated point mutations within the SDL of beta4 integrin tagged with green fluorescent protein (GFP-beta4K150A and GFP-beta4Q155L). We also generated a mutation within the I-like domain of the beta4 integrin, lying outside the SDL region (GFP-beta4V284E). We transfected constructs encoding the mutated beta4 integrins and a GFP-conjugated wild type beta4 integrin (GFP-beta4WT) into 804G cells, which assemble hemidesmosomes, and human endothelial cells, which express little endogenous beta4 integrin. In transfected 804G cells, GFP-beta4WT and GFP-beta4V284E colocalize with hemidesmosome proteins, whereas hemidesmosomal components in cells expressing GFP-beta4K150A and GFP-beta4Q155L are aberrantly localized. In endothelial cells, GFP-beta4WT and mutant proteins are co-expressed at the cell surface with alpha6 integrin. When transfected endothelial cells are plated onto laminin-5 matrix, GFP-beta4WT and GFP-beta4V284E localize with laminin-5, whereas GFP-beta4K150A and GFP-beta4Q155L do not. GFP-beta4WT and GFP-beta4V284E expressed in endothelial cells associate with the adaptor protein Shc when the cells are stimulated with laminin-5. However, GFP-beta4K150A and GFP-beta4Q155L fail to associate with Shc even when laminin-5 is present, thus impacting downstream signaling. These results provide evidence that the SDL segment of the beta4 integrin subunit is required for ligand binding and is involved in outside-in signaling.     

Chick integrin alpha V subunit molecular analysis reveals high conservation of structural domains and association with multiple beta subunits in embryo fibroblasts.

We have cloned and characterized a chick homologue of the human vitronectin receptor alpha subunit (alpha v) whose primary sequence is 83% identical with its human counterpart but less than 40% identical with any other known integrin alpha subunit. Comparison of the chick and human sequences reveals several highly conserved regions, including the cytoplasmic domain. The putative ligand binding domain contains alpha v-specific residues that may contribute to ligand binding specificity. These are concentrated in three regions that are located before and between the first three Ca2+ binding domains. Polyclonal antibodies raised against two peptides deduced from the putative cytoplasmic and extracellular domains of the chick alpha v sequence recognize specifically integrin heterodimers in chick embryo fibroblasts. At least three putative beta subunits coimmunoprecipitate with the chick alpha v subunit. In addition to a protein with the same molecular weight as beta 3 (94K), protein bands of Mr 84K and 110K are also coprecipitated. By successive immunodepletions, we demonstrate that this latter Mr 110K subunit is beta 1, which appears to be one of the alpha v-associated subunits in chick embryo fibroblasts.     

N-glycosylation of the beta-propeller domain of the integrin alpha5 subunit is essential for alpha5beta1 heterodimerization, expression on the cell surface, and its biological function

The N-glycosylation of integrin alpha5beta1 is thought to play crucial roles in cell spreading, cell migration, ligand binding, and dimer formation, but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. To investigate the importance of the N-glycans of this integrin in detail, sequential site-directed mutagenesis was carried out to remove single or combined putative N-glycosylation sites on the alpha5 integrin. Removal of the putative N-glycosylation sites on the beta-propeller, Thigh, Calf-1, or Calf-2 domains of the alpha5 subunit resulted in a decrease in molecular weight compared with the wild type, suggesting that all of these domains contain attached N-glycans. Importantly, the absence of N-glycosylation sites (sites 1-5) on the beta-propeller resulted in the persistent association of integrin subunit with calnexin in the endoplasmic reticulum, which subsequently blocked heterodimerization and its expression on the cell surface. Interestingly, the activities for cell spreading and migration for the alpha5 subunit carrying only three potential N-glycosylation sites (3-5 sites) on the beta-propeller were comparable with those of the wild type. In contrast, mutation of these three sites resulted in a significant decrease in cell spreading as well as functional expression, although the total expression level of the Delta3-5 mutant on the cell surface was comparable with that of wild type. Furthermore, we found that site 5 is a most important site for its expression on the cell surface, whereas the S5 mutant did not show any biological functions. Taken together, this study reveals for the first time that the N-glycosylation on the beta-propeller domain of the alpha5 subunit is essential for heterodimerization and biological functions of alpha5beta1 integrin and might also be useful for studies of the molecular structure.     

The N-terminal region and the mid-region complex of the integrin beta 2 subunit

In the primary sequence of the integrin beta subunit, the N-terminal region (NTR) and mid-region are separated by the I-like domain. To determine the spatial relationship and functional properties of the integrin beta(2) NTR and mid-region, we constructed beta(2)/beta(7) chimeras in which the NTR, I-like domain, and the mid-region of the beta(2) subunit were replaced by those of beta(7). Changing either the beta(2) NTR or mid-region, but not the I-like domain to that of beta(7) did not affect LFA-1 (alpha(L)beta(2)) formation and surface expression. Thus, the specificity of alpha(L)beta(2) pairing is conferred by the I-like domain but not the NTR or mid-region. Using these chimeras, the epitopes of six anti-beta(2) mAbs (H52, 7E4, AZN-L18, AZN-L27, KIM202, and MEM-148) were mapped. All except H52 require both the NTR and mid-region for epitope expression. Since these mAbs have distinct properties in terms of epitope expression and effect on LFA-1 binding to ICAM-1, we conclude that the beta(2) NTR and mid-region interact extensively. Although the I-like domain is located between the NTR and mid-region, its removal does not affect the folding of the beta(2) NTR/mid-region complex because this complex alone can be expressed as a soluble protein and precipitated by the appropriate mAbs. Finally, the mAbs H52 and 7E4, abrogated KIM185- but not Mg/EGTAinduced LFA-1/ICAM-1 binding and the epitope of MEM-148 is expressed on Mg/EGTA-activated but not resting LFA-1. These results suggest that the NTR/mid-region complex is involved in the regulation of LFA-1 function.     

Expression of normal and mutant avian integrin subunits in rodent cells [published erratum appears in J Cell Biol 1989 Oct;109(4 Pt 1):1187]

We describe the expression of the beta 1 subunit of avian integrin in rodent cells with the purpose of examining the structure-function relationships of various domains within this subunit. The exogenous subunit is efficiently and stably expressed in 3T3 cells, and it forms hybrid heterodimers with endogenous murine alpha subunits, including alpha 3 and alpha 5. These heterodimers are exported to the cell surface and localize in focal contacts where both extracellular matrix and cytoskeleton associate with the plasma membrane. Hybrid heterodimers consisting of exogenous beta 1 and endogenous alpha subunits bind effectively and specifically to columns of cell-binding fragments of fibronectin. The exogenous avian beta 1 subunit appears to function as well as its endogenous murine equivalent, consistent with the high degree of conservation noted previously for integrins. In contrast, expression of a mutant form of avian integrin beta 1 subunit lacking the cytoplasmic domain produces hybrid heterodimers which, while efficiently exported to the cell surface and still capable of binding fibronectin, do not localize efficiently in focal contacts. This further implicates the cytoplasmic domain of the beta 1 subunit in interactions required for cytoskeletal organization.     

Locking the beta3 integrin I-like domain into high and low affinity conformations with disulfides

Although integrin alpha subunit I domains exist in multiple conformations, it is controversial whether integrin beta subunit I-like domains undergo structurally analogous movements of the alpha7-helix that are linked to affinity for ligand. Disulfide bonds were introduced into the beta(3) integrin I-like domain to lock its beta6-alpha7 loop and alpha7-helix in two distinct conformations. Soluble ligand binding, ligand mimetic mAb binding and cell adhesion studies showed that disulfide-bonded receptor alpha(IIb)beta(3)(T329C/A347C) was locked in a low affinity state, and dithiothreitol treatment restored the capability of being activated to high affinity binding; by contrast, disulfide-bonded alpha(IIb)beta(3)(V332C/M335C) was locked in a high affinity state. The results suggest that activation of the beta subunit I-like domain is analogous to that of the alpha subunit I domain, i.e. that axial movement in the C-terminal direction of the alpha7-helix is linked to rearrangement of the I-like domain metal ion-dependent adhesion site into a high affinity conformation.     

Characterization of the integrin alpha 8 subunit: a new integrin beta 1-associated subunit, which is prominently expressed on axons and on cells in contact with basal laminae in chick embryos.

In this article, we describe the primary structure, the biochemical characterization and the tissue distribution of a novel integrin alpha subunit, named alpha 8. This subunit associates with the integrin beta 1 subunit to form alpha 8 beta 1 heterodimers. By sequence analysis, alpha 8 is more closely related to the alpha 5 and alpha v subunits than to other characterized integrin alpha subunits, but is clearly distinct from each of these. The alpha 8 subunit is expressed at moderate levels in several epithelial cells where its localization adjacent to basal laminae suggests that alpha 8-containing heterodimers interact with at least one extracellular matrix constituent. In embryos, the highest levels of alpha 8 protein expression are seen in the nervous system where alpha 8 is strongly expressed by several classes of projection neurons. The alpha 8 subunit is concentrated in axon tracts, including major projections in the spinal cord, optic system and auditory system. This tissue specific expression and cellular localization suggest that alpha 8-containing integrin receptors might promote axon outgrowth in the embryonic nervous system.     

The cytoplasmic domain of the alpha1 integrin subunit influences stress fiber formation via the conserved GFFKR motif

Integrins are heterodimeric transmembrane proteins that mediate substrate adhesion and migration but also the bidirectional transfer of information across the plasma membrane via their cytoplasmic domains. We addressed the question of whether the very short cytoplasmic tail of the alpha1 integrin subunit of alpha1beta1 integrin is required for alpha1beta1-specific adhesion, spreading, and migration. For this purpose we transfected the alpha1 integrin subunit and two cytoplasmically truncated alpha1 subunits into Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Elimination of the entire cytoplasmic domain of the alpha1 subunit does not affect adhesion but leads to inhibition of spreading and stress fiber formation. The defect in spreading could not be rescued by lysophosphatidic acid, which has been reported to stimulate actin stress fiber formation via Rho. Additionally, deletion of the entire cytoplasmic domain of the alpha1 subunit abolishes migration toward alpha1beta1-specific substrates. Migration and stress fiber formation are similar in CHO-alpha1 cells and CHO cells carrying an alpha1 subunit still containing the conserved GFFKR motif. So, the GFFKR motif of the alpha1 subunit is essential and sufficient for these processes.     

Specificity of PS integrin function during embryogenesis resides in the alpha subunit extracellular domain.

We tested the ability of different integrin alpha subunits to substitute for each other during embryonic development. Two alpha subunits, which form heterodimers with the same betaPS subunit, are expressed in complementary tissues in the Drosophila embryo, with alphaPS1 expressed in the epidermis and endoderm, and alphaPS2 expressed in the mesoderm. As a result the two integrin heterodimers are present on opposite surfaces at sites of interaction between the mesoderm and the other cell layers where they are required for normal development. Using the GAL4 system, we are able to rescue fully the embryonic lethality of an alphaPS2 null mutation with a UAS-alphaPS2 transgene, but only partially with a UAS-alphaPS1 gene, due to partial rescue of both muscle and midgut phenotypes. Similarly we are able to rescue the embryonic/first instar larval lethality of an alphaPS1 null mutation gene with UAS-alphaPS1, but only partially with UAS-alphaPS2. Each UAS-alpha gene, when it contains the cytoplasmic domain from the other alpha subunit, maintains an equivalent ability to rescue its own mutation and cannot fully rescue a mutation in the other alpha. We conclude that the two alpha subunits are not equivalent and have distinct functions which reside in the extracellular domains.     

High affinity ligand binding by integrins does not involve head separation

Conformational change in the integrin extracellular domain is required for high affinity ligand binding and is also involved in post-ligand binding cellular signaling. Although there is evidence to the contrary, electron microscopic studies showing that ligand binding triggers alpha- and beta-subunit dissociation in the integrin headpiece have gained popularity and support the hypothesis that head separation activates integrins. To test directly the head separation hypothesis, we enforced head association by introducing disulfide bonds across the interface between the alpha-subunit beta-propeller domain and the beta-subunit I-like domain. Basal and activation-dependent ligand binding by alpha(IIb)beta(3) and alpha(V)beta(3) was unaffected. The covalent linkage prevented dissociation of alpha(IIb)beta(3) into its subunits on EDTA-treated cells. Whereas EDTA dissociated wild type alpha(IIb)beta(3) on the cell surface, a ligand-mimetic Arg-Gly-Asp peptide did not, as judged by binding of complex-specific antibodies. Finally, a high affinity ligand-mimetic compound stabilized noncovalent association between alpha(IIb) and beta(3) headpiece fragments in the presence of SDS, indicating that ligand binding actually stabilized subunit association at the head, as opposed to the suggested subunit separation. The mechanisms of conformational regulation of integrin function should therefore be considered in the context of the associated alphabeta headpiece.     

Assembly and function of integrin receptors is dependent on opposing alpha and beta cytoplasmic domains.

The membrane proximal regions of integrin alpha and beta subunits are highly conserved in evolution. In particular, all integrin alpha subunits share the KXGFFKR sequence at the beginning of their cytoplasmic domains. Previous work has shown that this domain is important in integrin receptor assembly. Using chimeric integrin alpha and beta subunits, we show that the native cytoplasmic domains of both subunits must be present for efficient assembly. Most strikingly, chimeric alpha 1 and beta 1 subunits with reciprocally swapped intracellular domains dimerize selectively into collagen IV receptors expressed at high levels on the surface. However, these receptors, which bind ligand efficiently, are deficient in a variety of post-ligand binding events, including cytoskeletal association and induction of tyrosine phosphorylation. Furthermore, deletion of the distal alpha cytoplasmic domain in the swapped heterodimers leads to ligand-independent focal contact localization, which also occurs in wild-type subunits when the distal cytoplasmic domain is deleted. These results show that proper integrin assembly requires opposed alpha and beta cytoplasmic domains, and this opposition prevents ligand-independent focal contact localization. Our working hypothesis is that these two domains may associate during receptor assembly and provide the mechanism for integrin receptor latency.     

Cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains of integrin beta 1 and beta 3 subunits are functionally interchangeable

Integrin beta subunits combine with specific sets of alpha subunits to form functional adhesion receptors. The structure and binding properties of integrins suggest the presence of domains controlling at least three major functions: subunit association, ligand binding, and cytoskeletal interactions. To more carefully define structure/function relationships, a cDNA construct consisting of the extracellular domain of the avian beta 1 subunit and the cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains of the human beta 3 subunit was prepared and expressed in murine 3T3 cells. The resulting chimeric beta 1/3 subunit formed heterodimers with alpha subunits from the beta 1 subfamily, could not interact with alpha IIb from the beta 3 subfamily, was targeted to focal contacts, and formed functional complexes within the focal contacts. A second cDNA construct was prepared that coded for an avian beta 1 subunit without a transmembrane or cytoplasmic domain. This subunit was not found in association with an accompanying alpha subunit, nor was it found expressed on the cell surface. Instead, it accumulated in vesicles within the cytoplasm and was eventually shed from the cell. The results from studies of the behavior of these two cDNA constructs demonstrate that the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains play no role in alpha subunit selection, that the cytoplasmic domain of beta 3 is capable of functioning in the context of alpha subunits with which it is not normally paired, and that both integrin subunits must be membrane associated for normal assembly and transport to cell surface adhesive structures.     

Structure of an integrin-ligand complex deduced from solution x-ray scattering and site-directed mutagenesis

The structural basis of the interaction of integrin heterodimers with their physiological ligands is poorly understood. We have used solution x-ray scattering to visualize the head region of integrin alpha 5 beta 1 in an inactive (Ca2+-occupied) state, and in complex with a fragment of fibronectin containing the RGD and synergy recognition sequences. Shape reconstructions of the data have been interpreted in terms of appropriate molecular models. The scattering data suggest that the head region undergoes no gross conformational changes upon ligand binding but do lend support to a proposed outward movement of the hybrid domain in the beta subunit. Fibronectin is observed to bind across the top of the head region, which contains an alpha subunit beta-propeller and a beta subunit vWF type A domain. The model of the complex indicates that the synergy region binds on the side of the beta-propeller domain. In support of this suggestion, mutagenesis of a prominent loop region on the side of the propeller identifies two residues (Tyr208 and Ile210) involved in recognition of the synergy region. Our data provide the first view of a complex between an integrin and a macromolecular ligand in solution, at a nominal resolution of approximately 10 A.     

Involvement of transmembrane domain interactions in signal transduction by alpha/beta integrins

The alpha and beta subunits of alpha/beta heterodimeric integrins function together to bind ligands in the extracellular region and transduce signals across cellular membranes. A possible function for the transmembrane regions in integrin signaling has been proposed from structural and computational data. We have analyzed the capacity of the integrin alpha(2), alpha(IIb), alpha(4), beta(1), beta(3), and beta(7) transmembrane domains to form homodimers and/or heterodimers. Our data suggest that the integrin transmembrane helices can help to stabilize heterodimeric integrins but that the interactions do not specifically associate particular pairs of alpha and beta subunits; rather, the alpha/beta subunit interaction constrains the extramembranous domains, facilitating signal transduction by a promiscuous transmembrane helix-helix association.     

The alpha 1/beta 1 and alpha 6/beta 1 integrin heterodimers mediate cell attachment to distinct sites on laminin

This study was undertaken to determine the roles of individual alpha/beta 1 integrin heterodimers in promoting cellular interactions with the different attachment-promoting domains of laminin (LN). To do this, antibodies to the integrin beta 1 subunit or to specific integrin alpha subunits were tested for effects on cell attachment to LN, to elastase fragments E1-4 and E1, derived from the short arms and core of LN's cruciform structure, and to fragment E8 derived from the long arm of this structure. The human JAR choriocarcinoma cells used in this study attached to LN and to fragments E1 and E8. Attachment to E1-4 required a much higher substrate coating concentration, suggesting that it is a poor substrate for JAR cell attachment. The ability of cells to attach to different LN domains suggested the presence of more than one LN receptor. These multiple LN receptors were shown to be beta 1 integrin heterodimers because antibodies to the integrin beta 1 subunit inhibited attachment of JAR cells to LN and its three fragments. To identify the individual integrin alpha/beta 1 heterodimers that mediate interactions with these LN domains, mAbs specific for individual beta 1 heterodimers in human cells were used to study JAR cell interactions with LN and its fragments. An anti-alpha 6/beta 1-specific mAb, GoH3, virtually eliminated cell attachment to E8 and partially inhibited attachment to E1 and intact LN. Thus the major alpha 6/beta 1 attachment domain is present in fragment E8. An alpha 1/beta 1-specific mAb (S2G3) strongly inhibited cell attachment to collagen IV and partially inhibited JAR attachment to LN fragment E1. Thus, the alpha 1/beta 1 heterodimer is a dual receptor for collagen IV and LN, interacting with LN at a site in fragment E1. In combination, the anti-alpha 1- and anti-alpha 6-specific antibodies completely inhibited JAR cell attachment to LN and fragment E1. Thus, the alpha 1/beta 1 and alpha 6/beta 1 integrin heterodimers each function as LN receptors and act together to mediate the interactions of human JAR choriocarcinoma cells with LN.