Efficacy of RNA amplification is dependent on sequence characteristics: implications for gene expression profiling using a cDNA microarray

Minute tissue samples or single cells increasingly provide the starting material for gene expression profiling, which often requires RNA amplification. Although much effort has been put into optimizing amplification protocols, the relative abundance of RNA templates in the amplified product is frequently biased. We applied a T7 polymerase-based technique to amplify RNA from two tissues of a cichlid fish and compared expression levels of unamplified and amplified RNA on a cDNA microarray. Amplification bias was generally minor and comprised features that were lost (1.3%) or gained (2.5%) through amplification and features that were scored as regulated before but unregulated after amplification (4.2%) or vice versa (19.5%). We examined 10 sequence-specific properties and found that GC content, folding energy, hairpin length and number, and lengths of poly(A) and poly(T) stretches significantly affected RNA amplification. We conclude that, if RNA amplification is used in gene expression studies, preceding experiments controlling for amplification bias should be performed.     

Reliable amplification method for bacterial RNA

DNA microarray technology has been increasingly applied for studies of clinical samples. Frequently, RNA probes from clinical samples are available in limited amounts. We describe a reliable amplification method for bacterial RNA. We verified this method on mycobacterial RNA applying mycobacterial genome-directed primers (mtGDPs). Glass slide-based oligoarrays were employed to assess the quality of the amplification method. We observed a relatively small bias in amplified RNA pool when compared to the unamplified one. Up to 1000-fold linear RNA amplification in a single amplification round was obtained. To our knowledge, this study describes the first amplification method for mycobacterial RNA.     

Application of cDNA arrays to monitor mRNA profiles in single preimplantation mouse embryos

Array technology is a widely used tool for gene expression profiling in various biological systems. However, the application of this method to mammalian preimplantation embryos is limited by the small amount of mRNA that can be extracted from a single embryo, which is not sufficient for array analysis. Here we report a protocolfor the rapid global amplification of embryonic mRNA that permits the generation of expression profiles from single murine blastocysts. The approach combines global PCR and 77 RNA polymerase amplification and allows the preparation of labeled, amplified RNA for array hybridization from single murine blastocysts containing approximately 1.5 pg mRNA in less than 12 h. We demonstrate that this amplification procedure is highly reproducible and does not bias original relative mRNA levels. Signal patterns from various embryonic stages of murine development revealed marked differences in mRNA expression that were in accordance with previously published data. We found genes known to be involved in embryonic apoptosis expressed at different levels in individual murine day 3.5 blastocysts. This technique can thus be used to assess embryonic viability and investigate molecular mechanisms of embryonic development.     

High-fidelity mRNA amplification for gene profiling

The completion of the Human Genome Project has made possible the comprehensive analysis of gene expression, and cDNA microarrays are now being employed for expression analysis in cancer cell lines or excised surgical specimens. However, broader application of cDNA microarrays is limited by the amount of RNA required: 50-200 microg of total RNA (T-RNA) and 2-5 microg poly(A) RNA. To broaden the use of cDNA microarrays, some methods aiming at intensifying fluorescence signal have resulted in modest improvement. Methods devoted to amplifying starting poly(A) RNA or cDNA show promise, in that detection can be increased by orders of magnitude. However, despite the common use of these amplification procedures, no systematic assessment of their limits and biases has been documented. We devised a procedure that optimizes amplification of low-abundance RNA samples by combining antisense RNA (aRNA) amplification with a template-switching effect (Clonetech, Palo Alto, CA). The fidelity of aRNA amplified from 1:10,000 to 1:100,000 of commonly used input RNA was comparable to expression profiles observed with conventional poly(A) RNA- or T-RNA-based arrays.     

Uniform amplification of multiple DNAs by emulsion PCR

When several DNAs are amplified by PCR in one PCR tube, biased amplification is known to occur because amplification efficiency differs from one DNA to another. Therefore, we conducted PCR in the water in oil-emulsion (W/O emulsion) to examine whether the procedure allows the uniform amplification of several DNAs. In the amplification of a model library consisting of two clones, the emulsification of the PCR mixture successfully reduced the difference in its amplification efficiency to approximately one-seventh the value obtained without emulsification. Furthermore, we conducted repeated PCR to amplify a model library consisting of ten short hairpin RNA (shRNA) expression vectors as a model experiment for gene discovery using an shRNA expression library. Consequently, the emulsification of the PCR mixture successfully reduced PCR bias. Our results indicate that emulsion PCR is capable of uniformly amplifying libraries of shRNA, ribozyme, cDNA, and others, and is useful also for gene discovery using these libraries.     

Detection of chromosomal structural alterations in single cells by SNP arrays: a systematic survey of amplification bias and optimized workflow

Background

In single-cell human genome analysis using whole-genome amplified product, a strong amplification bias involving allele dropout and preferential amplification hampers the quality of results. Using an oligonucleotide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array, we systematically examined the nature of this amplification bias, including frequency, degree, and preference for genomic location, and we assessed the effects of this amplification bias on subsequent genotype and chromosomal copy number analyses.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We found a large variability in amplification bias among the amplified products obtained by multiple displacement amplification (MDA), and this bias had a severe effect on the genotype and chromosomal copy number analyses. We established optimal experimental conditions for pre-screening for high-quality amplified products, processing array data, and analyzing chromosomal structural alterations. Using this optimized protocol, we successfully detected previously unidentified chromosomal structural alterations in single cells from a lymphoblastoid cell line. These alterations were subsequently confirmed by karyotype analysis. In addition, we successfully obtained reproducible chromosomal copy number profiles of single cells from the cell line with a complex karyotype, indicating the applicability and potential of our optimized workflow.

Conclusions/Significance

Our results suggest that the quality of amplification products should be critically assessed before using them for genomic analyses. The method of MDA-based whole-genome amplification followed by SNP array analysis described here will be useful for exploring chromosomal alterations in single cells.     

Optimized amplification and fluorescent labeling of small cell samples for genomic array-CGH.

BACKGROUND: Whole genome amplification (WGA) is usually needed in the genetic analysis of samples containing a low number of cells. In genome-wide analysis of DNA copy numbers by array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) it is very important that the genome is evenly represented throughout the amplified product. All currently available WGA techniques are generating some degree of bias. METHODS: A way to compensate for this is using a reference sample which is similarly amplified, as the introduced amplification bias will be leveled out. Additionally, direct labeling of the amplified DNA is performed to bypass the currently widely applied random primed labeling, which involves an additional amplification of the product and is introducing extra bias. RESULTS: In this article it is shown that equal processing of the test and reference sample is indeed crucial to generate an optimal array-CGH profile of amplified DNA samples. Also presented here is that the labeling method may significantly effect the array-CGH result, it is shown that with direct chemical labeling using platinum derivates (ULS labeling) optimal array-CGH results are obtained. CONCLUSIONS: We show that an optimized WGA strategy for both test and reference sample in combination with direct chemical labeling results in a reliable array-CGH profile of samples as low as a 30 cell equivalent.     

Microarray-based comparison of three amplification methods for nanogram amounts of total RNA

Gene expression profiling using microarrays requires microgram amounts of RNA, which limits its direct application for the study of nanogram RNA samples obtained using microdissection, laser capture microscopy, or needle biopsy. A novel system based on Ribo-SPIA technology (RS, Ovation-Biotin amplification and labeling system) was recently introduced. The utility of the RS system, an optimized prototype system for picogram RNA samples (pRS), and two T7-based systems involving one or two rounds of amplification (OneRA, Standard Protocol, or TwoRA, Small Sample Prototcol, version II) were evaluated in the present study. Mouse kidney (MK) and mouse universal reference (MUR) RNA samples, 0.3 ng to 10 µg, were analyzed using high-density Affymetrix Mouse Genome 430 2.0 GeneChip arrays. Call concordance between replicates, correlations of signal intensity, signal intensity ratios, and minimal fold increase necessary for significance were determined. All systems amplified partially overlapping sets of genes with similar signal intensity correlations. pRS amplified the highest number of genes from 10-ng RNA samples. We detected 24 of 26 genes verified by RT-PCR in samples prepared using pRS. TwoRA yielded somewhat higher call concordances than did RS and pRS (91.8% vs. 89.3% and 88.1%, respectively). Although all target preparation methods were suitable, pRS amplified the highest number of targets and was found to be suitable for amplification of as little as 0.3 ng of total RNA. In addition, RS and pRS were faster and simpler to use than the T7-based methods and resulted in the generation of cDNA, which is more stable than cRNA. gene expression microarray analysis; microdissection; nucleic acid amplification techniques