On the role of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase sigma 70 region 4.2 and alpha-subunit C-terminal domains in promoter complex formation on the extended -10 galP1 promoter

Bacterial promoters of the extended -10 class contain a single consensus element, and the DNA sequence upstream of this element is not critical for promoter activity. Open promoter complexes can be formed on an extended -10 Escherichia coli galP1 promoter at temperatures as low as 6 degrees C, when complexes on most promoters are closed. Here, we studied the contribution of upstream contacts to promoter complex formation using galP1 and its derivatives lacking the extended -10 motif and/or containing the -35 promoter consensus element. A panel of E. coli RNA polymerase holoenzymes containing two, one, or no alpha-subunit C-terminal domains (alpha CTD) and either wild-type sigma 70 subunit or sigma 70 lacking region 4.2 was assembled and tested for promoter complex formation. At 37 degrees C, alpha CTD and sigma 70 region 4.2 were individually dispensable for promoter complex formation on galP1 derivatives with extended -10 motif. However, no promoter complexes formed when both alpha CTD and sigma 70 region 4.2 were absent. Thus, in the context of an extended -10 promoter, alpha CTD and sigma 70 region 4.2 interactions with upstream DNA can functionally substitute for each other. In contrast, at low temperature, alpha CTD and sigma 70 region 4.2 interactions with upstream DNA were found to be functionally distinct, for sigma 70 region 4.2 but not alpha CTD was required for open promoter complex formation on galP1 derivatives with extended -10 motif. We propose a model involving sigma 70 region 4.2 interaction with the beta flap domain that explains these observations.     

Mutational analysis of the promoter recognized by Chlamydia and Escherichia coli sigma(28) RNA polymerase

sigma(28) RNA polymerase is an alternative RNA polymerase that has been postulated to have a role in developmental gene regulation in Chlamydia. Although a consensus bacterial sigma(28) promoter sequence has been proposed, it is based on a relatively small number of defined promoters, and the promoter structure has not been systematically analyzed. To evaluate the sequence of the sigma(28)-dependent promoter, we performed a comprehensive mutational analysis of the Chlamydia trachomatis hctB promoter, testing the effect of point substitutions on promoter activity. We defined a -35 element recognized by chlamydial sigma(28) RNA polymerase that resembles the consensus -35 sequence. Within the -10 element, however, chlamydial sigma(28) RNA polymerase showed a striking preference for a CGA sequence at positions -12 to -10 rather than the longer consensus -10 sequence. We also observed a strong preference for this CGA sequence by Escherichia coli sigma(28) RNA polymerase, suggesting that this previously unrecognized motif is the critical component of the -10 promoter element recognized by sigma(28) RNA polymerase. Although the consensus spacer length is 11 nucleotides (nt), we found that sigma(28) RNA polymerase from both Chlamydia and E. coli transcribed a promoter with either an 11- or 12-nt spacer equally well. Altogether, we found very similar results for sigma(28) RNA polymerase from C. trachomatis and E. coli, suggesting that promoter recognition by this alternative RNA polymerase is well conserved among bacteria. The preferred sigma(28) promoter that we defined in the context of the hctB promoter is TAAAGwwy-n(11/12)-ryCGAwrn, where w is A or T, r is a purine, y is a pyrimidine, n is any nucleotide, and n(11/12) is a spacer of 11 or 12 nt.     

Genetic evidence for interaction of sigma A with two promoters in Bacillus subtilis.

The specificity of promoter binding by RNA polymerase is governed by the sigma subunit. Recent studies, in which single-amino-acid substitutions in sigma factors have been found to suppress the effects of specific base pair substitutions in promoters, support the model that these sigma factors make sequence-specific contacts with nucleotides at the -10 and -35 regions of promoters. We found that single-amino-acid substitutions in the putative -35 region and -10 region recognition domains of sigma A specifically suppressed the effects of mutations in the -35 and -10 regions, respectively, of two promoters that are expressed in exponentially growing Bacillus subtilis. These mutations change the specificity of sigma A, the primary sigma factor in growing B. subtilis, and demonstrate that this sigma factor interacts with promoters in a manner similar to that of its homolog in Escherichia coli, sigma 70. These mutant derivatives of sigma A also provide a tool that may be useful for determining whether sigma A uses specific promoters in vivo.     

Specific recognition of the -10 promoter element by the free RNA polymerase sigma subunit

Bacterial RNA polymerase holoenzyme relies on its sigma subunit for promoter recognition and opening. In the holoenzyme, regions 2 and 4 of the sigma subunit are positioned at an optimal distance to allow specific recognition of the -10 and -35 promoter elements, respectively. In free sigma, the promoter binding regions are positioned closer to each other and are masked for interactions with the promoter, with sigma region 1 playing a role in the masking. To analyze the DNA-binding properties of the free sigma, we selected single-stranded DNA aptamers that are specific to primary sigma subunits from several bacterial species, including Escherichia coli and Thermus aquaticus. The aptamers share a consensus motif, TGTAGAAT, that is similar to the extended -10 promoter. We demonstrate that recognition of this motif by sigma region 2 occurs without major structural rearrangements of sigma observed upon the holoenzyme formation and is not inhibited by sigma regions 1 and 4. Thus, the complex process of the -10 element recognition by RNA polymerase holoenzyme can be reduced to a simple system consisting of an isolated sigma subunit and a short aptamer oligonucleotide.     

Factor-independent activation of Escherichia coli rRNA transcription. II. characterization of complexes of rrnB P1 promoters containing or lacking the upstream activator region with Escherichia coli RNA polymerase.

A region upstream from the Escherichia coli rrnB P1 promoter, the upstream activator region (UAR), increases the activity of the promoter in vivo and the rate of association with RNA polymerase (E sigma 70) in vitro in the presence of the two initiating nucleotides. We have used four types of chemical and enzymatic footprinting probes to determine whether rrnB P1-E sigma 70 complexes formed in the presence of the initiating nucleotides (RPinit) differ from typical open complexes (RPo) formed in the absence of the initiating nucleotides and to examine the structural differences between rrnB P1 complexes containing the UAR and those lacking the UAR. We find that the rrnB P1-RPinit complex closely resembles open complexes formed at other E sigma 70 promoters, indicating that the formation of the first phosphodiester bond does not result in a major rearrangement of the promoter-RNA polymerase complex. An unusual potassium permanganate modification at position -18 in both RPo and RPinit indicates the possible presence of a subtle difference in the -10, -35 spacer structure compared to some other E. coli promoters. We show that the E sigma 70-rrnB P1 complex formed with the promoter containing the UAR has DNase I and hydroxyl radical cleavage patterns in the -50 region different from those observed with the same promoter lacking the UAR. These results are interpreted to indicate that E sigma 70 may interact with a region further upstream from that contacted by RNA polymerase bound at most other promoters and/or that unusual structural properties of this region are induced by bound E sigma 70.