Role of the insertion domain and the zinc-finger motif of Escherichia coli UvrA in damage recognition and ATP hydrolysis

UvrA is the initial DNA damage-sensing protein in bacterial nucleotide excision repair. Each protomer of the UvrA dimer contains two ATPase domains, that belong to the family of ATP-binding cassette domains. Three structural domains are inserted in these ATPase domains: the insertion domain (ID) and UvrB binding domain (in ATP domain I) and the zinc-finger motif (in ATP domain II). In this paper we analyze the function of the ID and the zinc finger motif in damage specific binding of Escherichia coli UvrA. We show that the ID is not essential for damage discrimination, but it does stabilize UvrA on the DNA, most likely by forming a clamp around the DNA helix. We present evidence that two conserved arginine residues in the ID contact the phosphate backbone of the DNA, leading to strand separation after the ATPase-driven movement of the ID's. Remarkably, deletion of the ID generated a phenotype in which UV-survival strongly depends on the presence of photolyase, indicating that UvrA and photolyase form a ternary complex on a CPD-lesion. The zinc-finger motif is shown to be important for the transfer of the damage recognition signal to the ATPase of UvrA. In the absence of this domain the coupling between DNA binding and ATP hydrolysis is completely lost. Mutation of the phenylalanine residue in the tip of the zinc-finger domain resulted in a protein in which the ATPase was already triggered when binding to an undamaged site. As the zinc-finger motif is connected to the DNA binding regions on the surface of UvrA, this strongly suggests that damage-specific binding to these regions results in a rearrangement of the zinc-finger motif, which in its turn activates the ATPase. We present a model how damage recognition is transmitted to activate ATP hydrolysis in ATP binding domain I of the protein.     

The effect of Escherichia coli Uvr protein binding on the topology of supercoiled DNA.

The effects of the binding of the E. coli UvrA and UvrB proteins on the linking number (delta L) of superhelical DNA has been measured. The effects of cofactor ATP structure on UvrAB-nucleoprotein complex formation revealed that nucleotide binding, not hydrolysis, is sufficient to locally unwind the DNA helix of both ultraviolet light-damaged as well as undamaged DNAs. The extent of this unwinding is of the same order of magnitude as the nucleotide distances of the double incision sites generated by the UvrABC endonucleolytic reaction.     

Dimerization of Escherichia coli UvrA and its binding to undamaged and ultraviolet light damaged DNA

The initial stages in the repair of damaged DNA by the Escherichia coli uvr system involve the recognition of damage by UvrA. We have examined in detail the binding of UvrA to DNA randomly damaged by ultraviolet light, undamaged DNA, and single-stranded DNA using nitrocellulose filter binding and gel mobility shift assays to arrive at the following model: UvrA dimers bind specifically to damaged DNA both in the presence and in the absence of ATP. The dimerization of UvrA is promoted by UvrA concentrations greater than 1 nM, the presence of ATP, or physiological temperatures, and the dimerization step dominates the temperature dependence of UvrA binding to DNA damaged by ultraviolet light. The apparent association constant for specific binding is dependent on the concentration of UvrA due to coupled dimerization, aggregation, and nonspecific binding reactions. At 1 nM UvrA, either with or without ATP, Kuv approximately 10(9) M-1. The binding of UvrA to undamaged DNA is 10(3)-10(4)-fold weaker than the damage-specific binding. Both the strength of damage-specific binding and the discrimination between damaged and undamaged sites are affected by the salt concentration. The kinetics of association and dissociation reactions indicate that the primary effects of ATP are on the extent of UvrA dimerization rather than on the properties of the UvrA-uvDNA complex. The complexity of the interaction of UvrA, ATP, and DNA is indicated by the opposing effects of ATP binding and hydrolysis on UvrA dimerization.     

Site-specific mutagenesis of conserved residues within Walker A and B sequences of Escherichia coli UvrA protein.

UvrA is the ATPase subunit of the DNA repair enzyme (A)BC excinuclease. The amino acid sequence of this protein has revealed, in addition to two zinc fingers, three pairs of nucleotide binding motifs each consisting of a Walker A and B sequence. We have conducted site-specific mutagenesis, ATPase kinetic analyses, and nucleotide binding equilibrium measurements to correlate these sequence motifs with activity. Replacement of the invariant Lys by Ala in the putative A sequences indicated that K37 and K646 but not K353 are involved in ATP hydrolysis. In contrast, substitution of the invariant Asp by Asn in the B sequences at positions D238, D513, or D857 had little effect on the in vivo activity of the protein. Nucleotide binding studies revealed a stoichiometry of 0.5 ADP/UvrA monomer while kinetic measurements on wild-type and mutant proteins showed that the active form of UvrA is a dimer with 2 catalytic sites which interact in a positive cooperative manner in the presence of ADP; mutagenesis of K37 but not of K646 attenuated this cooperativity. Loss of ATPase activity was about 75% in the K37A, 86% in the K646A mutant, and 95% in the K37A-K646A double mutant. These amino acid substitutions had only a marginal effect on the specific binding of UvrA to damaged DNA but drastically reduced its ability to deliver UvrB to the damage site. We find that the deficient UvrB loading activity of these mutant UvrA proteins results from their inability to associate with UvrB in the form of (UvrA)2(UvrB)1 complexes. We conclude that UvrA forms a dimer with two ATPase domains involving K37 and K646 and that the work performed by ATP hydrolysis is the delivery of UvrB to the damage site on DNA.     

Analysis of sequential steps of nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli using synthetic substrates containing single psoralen adducts

Escherichia coli ABC excinuclease initiates the removal of dodecanucleotides from damaged DNA in an ATP-dependent reaction. Using a synthetic DNA fragment containing a psoralen adduct at a defined position we have investigated the interaction of the components of the enzyme with substrate by DNase I footprinting. We find that the UvrA subunit binds to DNA specifically in the absence of cofactors and that the binding affinity is stimulated about 4-fold by ATP and only marginally inhibited by ADP. The UvrA.DNA complexes formed in the absence of co-factors or in the presence of either ATP or ADP are remarkably similar. In contrast, adenosine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate) increases nonspecific binding and completely abolishes the UvrA footprint. The UvrB subunit can associate with the UvrA subunit on DNA in the absence of ATP, but this ternary UvrA.UvrB.DNA complex is qualitatively different from that formed in the presence of ATP. The UvrC subunit elicits no additional change in the UvrA-UvrB footprint. Helicase II (UvrD protein) does not alter the UvrA-UvrB footprint but does appear to interact at the 5'-incision site of the postincision complex. DNA polymerase I fills in the excision gap in the presence or absence of helicase II and apparently releases the ABC excinuclease from the repaired DNA. Nearly 90% of the repair patches are 12 nucleotides long, and this length is not affected by helicase II. We see no evidence by DNase I footprinting for the formation of a multiprotein complex encompassing the UvrA, -B, -C, and -D proteins and DNA polymerase I.     

ATPase activity of the UvrA and UvrAB protein complexes of the Escherichia coli UvrABC endonuclease.

We have analyzed the ATPase activity exhibited by the UvrABC DNA repair complex. The UvrA protein is an ATPase whose lack of DNA dependence may be related to the ATP induced monomer-dimer transitions. ATP induced dimerization may be responsible for the enhanced DNA binding activity observed in the presence of ATP. Although the UvrA ATPase is not stimulated by dsDNA, such DNA can modulate the UvrA ATPase activity by decreases in Km and Vm and alterations in the Ki for ADP and ATP-gamma-S. The induction of such changes upon binding to DNA may be necessary for cooperative interactions of UvrA with UvrB that result in a DNA stimulated ATPase for the UvrAB protein complex. The UvrAB ATPase displays unique kinetic profiles that are dependent on the structure of the DNA effector. These kinetic changes correlate with changes in footprinting patterns, the stabilization of protein complexes on DNA damage and with the expression of helicase activity.     

Amplification and purification of UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC proteins of Escherichia coli

The UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC proteins of Escherichia coli are subunits of a DNA repair enzyme, ABC exci nuclease. In order to amplify these proteins, we have joined the artificial canonical promoter tac (Amann E., Brosius, J., and Ptashne, M. (1983) Gene (Amst.) 25, 167-178) to the uvr genes to obtain plasmids that express these genes under the control of the lac repressor. When cells carrying the tac-uvr plasmids are induced by the gratuitous lac inducer isopropyl-beta-D-galactoside the Uvr proteins are overproduced reaching a level of 10-20% of total cellular proteins after 6-8 h of induction. We have developed methods to purify all three Uvr proteins, UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC, in milligram quantities and to near homogeneity from these overproducing cells. The purified UvrA protein is an ATPase but UvrB and UvrC proteins are not. However, UvrB protein stimulates the ATPase activity of UvrA protein by a factor of 1.5 in the presence of double-stranded DNA and by a factor of about 2.6 in the presence of UV-irradiated DNA but not in the absence of DNA.     

The C-terminal zinc finger of UvrA does not bind DNA directly but regulates damage-specific DNA binding

In prokaryotic nucleotide excision repair, UvrA recognizes DNA perturbations and recruits UvrB for the recognition and processing steps in the reaction. One of the most remarkable aspects of UvrA is that it can recognize a wide range of DNA lesions that differ in chemistry and structure. However, how UvrA interacts with DNA is unknown. To examine the role that the UvrA C-terminal zinc finger domain plays in DNA binding, an eleven amino acid deletion was constructed (ZnG UvrA). Biochemical characterization of the ZnG UvrA protein was carried out using UvrABC DNA incision, DNA binding and ATPase assays. Although ZnG UvrA was able to bind dsDNA slightly better than wild-type UvrA, the ZnG UvrA mutant only supported 50-75% of wild type incision. Surprisingly, the ZnG UvrA mutant, while retaining its ability to bind dsDNA, did not support damage-specific binding. Furthermore, this mutant protein only provided 10% of wild-type Bca UvrA complementation for UV survival of an uvrA deletion strain. In addition, ZnG UvrA failed to stimulate the UvrB DNA damage-associated ATPase activity. Electrophoretic mobility shift analysis was used to monitor UvrB loading onto damaged DNA with wild-type UvrA or ZnG UvrA. The ZnG UvrA protein showed a 30-60% reduction in UvrB loading as compared with the amount of UvrB loaded by wild-type UvrA. These data demonstrate that the C-terminal zinc finger of UvrA is required for regulation of damage-specific DNA binding.     

Architecture of nucleotide excision repair complexes: DNA is wrapped by UvrB before and after damage recognition

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a major DNA repair mechanism that recognizes a broad range of DNA damages. In Escherichia coli, damage recognition in NER is accomplished by the UvrA and UvrB proteins. We have analysed the structural properties of the different protein-DNA complexes formed by UvrA, UvrB and (damaged) DNA using atomic force microscopy. Analysis of the UvrA(2)B complex in search of damage revealed the DNA to be wrapped around the UvrB protein, comprising a region of about seven helical turns. In the UvrB-DNA pre-incision complex the DNA is wrapped in a similar way and this DNA configuration is dependent on ATP binding. Based on these results, a role for DNA wrapping in damage recognition is proposed. Evidence is presented that DNA wrapping in the pre-incision complex also stimulates the rate of incision by UvrC.     

Deletion mutagenesis of the Escherichia coli UvrA protein localizes domains for DNA binding, damage recognition, and protein-protein interactions.

The UvrA protein is the DNA binding and damage recognition subunit of the damage-specific UvrABC endonuclease. In addition, it is an ATPase/GTPase, and the binding energy of ATP is linked to dimerization of the UvrA protein. Furthermore, the UvrA protein interacts with the UvrB protein to modulate its activities, both in solution and in association with DNA, where the UvrAB complex possesses a helicase activity. The domains of the UvrA protein that sponsor each of these activities were localized within the protein by studying the in vitro properties of a set of purified deletion mutants of the UvrA protein. A region located within the first 230 amino acids was found to contain the minimal region necessary for interactions with UvrB, the UvrA dimerization interface was localized to within the first 680 amino acids, and the DNA binding domain lies within the first 900 amino acids of the 940-amino acid UvrA protein. Two damage recognition domains were detected. The first domain, which coincides with the DNA binding region, is required to detect the damage. The second domain, located on or near the C-terminal 40 amino acids, stabilizes the protein-DNA complex when damage is encountered.     

The presence of two UvrB subunits in the UvrAB complex ensures damage detection in both DNA strands

It is generally accepted that the damage recognition complex of nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli consists of two UvrA and one UvrB molecule, and that in the preincision complex UvrB binds to the damage as a monomer. Using scanning force microscopy, we show here that the damage recognition complex consists of two UvrA and two UvrB subunits, with the DNA wrapped around one of the UvrB monomers. Upon binding the damage and release of the UvrA subunits, UvrB remains a dimer in the preincision complex. After association with the UvrC protein, one of the UvrB monomers is released. We propose a model in which the presence of two UvrB subunits ensures damage recognition in both DNA strands. Upon binding of the UvrA(2)B(2) complex to a putative damaged site, the DNA wraps around one of the UvrB monomers, which will subsequently probe one of the DNA strands for the presence of a lesion. When no damage is found, the DNA will wrap around the second UvrB subunit, which will check the other strand for aberrations.     

Two forms of UvrC protein with different double-stranded DNA binding affinities

Using phosphocellulose followed by single-stranded DNA-cellulose chromatography for purification of UvrC proteins from overproducing cells, we found that UvrC elutes at two peaks: 0.4 m KCl (UvrCI) and 0.6 m KCl (UvrCII). Both forms of UvrC have a major peptide band (>95%) of the same molecular weight and identical N-terminal amino acid sequences, which are consistent with the initiation codon being at the unusual GTG site. Both forms of UvrC are active in incising UV-irradiated, supercoiled phiX-174 replicative form I DNA in the presence of UvrA and UvrB proteins; however, the specific activity of UvrCII is one-fourth that of UvrCI. The molecular weight of UvrCII is four times that of UvrCI on the basis of results of size exclusion chromatography and glutaraldehyde cross-linking reactions, indicating that UvrCII is a tetramer of UvrCI. Functionally, these two forms of UvrC proteins can be distinguished under reaction conditions in which the protein/nucleotide molar ratio is >0.06 by using UV-irradiated, (32)P-labeled DNA fragments as substrates; under these conditions UvrCII is inactive in incision, but UvrCI remains active. The activity of UvrCII in incising UV-irradiated, (32)P- labeled DNA fragments can be restored by adding unirradiated competitive DNA, and the increased level of incision corresponds to a decreased level of UvrCII binding to the substrate DNA. The sites of incision at the 5' and 3' sides of a UV-induced pyrimidine dimer are the same for UvrCI and UvrCII. Nitrocellulose filter binding and gel retardation assays show that UvrCII binds to both UV-irradiated and unirradiated double-stranded DNA with the same affinity (K(a), 9 x 10(8)/m) and in a concentration-dependent manner, whereas UvrCI does not. These two forms of UvrC were also produced by the endogenous uvrC operon. We propose that UvrCII-DNA binding may interfere with Uvr(A)(2)B-DNA damage complex formation. However, because of its low copy number and low binding affinity to DNA, UvrCII may not interfere with Uvr(A)(2)B-DNA damage complex formation in vivo, but instead through double-stranded DNA binding UvrCII may become concentrated at genomic areas and therefore may facilitate nucleotide excision repair.     

Dynamics of the UvrABC nucleotide excision repair proteins analyzed by fluorescence resonance energy transfer

UvrB plays a key role in bacterial nucleotide excision repair. It is the ultimate damage-binding protein that interacts with both UvrA and UvrC. The oligomeric state of UvrB and the UvrAB complex have been subject of debate for a long time. Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between GFP and YFP fused to the C-terminal end of Escherichia coli UvrB, we unambiguously show that in solution two UvrB subunits bind to UvrA, most likely as part of a UvrA2B2 complex. This complex is most stable when both UvrA and UvrB are in the ATP-bound form. Analysis of a truncated form of UvrB shows that binding to UvrA promotes dimerization of the two C-terminal domain 4 regions of UvrB. The presence of undamaged DNA leads to dissociation of the UvrA2B2 complex, but when the ATPase site of UvrB is inactivated, the complex is trapped on the DNA. When the complex is bound to a damaged site, FRET between the two UvrB subunits could still be detected, but only as long as UvrA remains associated. Dissociation of UvrA from the damage-bound UvrB dimer leads to the reduction of the magnitude of the FRET signal, indicating that the domain 4 regions no longer interact. We propose that the UvrA-induced dimerization of the domain 4 regions serves to shield these domains from premature UvrC binding. Only after specific binding of the UvrB dimer to a damaged site and subsequent release of UvrA is the contact between the domain 4 regions broken, allowing recruitment of UvrC and subsequent incisions.     

Interaction of the UvrABC endonuclease with DNA containing a psoralen monoadduct or cross-link. Differential effects of superhelical density and comparison of preincision complexes.

The effect of negative supercoiling on UvrABC incision of covalently closed duplex DNA circles containing either a furan-side monoadduct or a cross-link of 4'-hydroxymethyl-4,5',8-trimethylpsoralen at a unique site was examined. The rate of UvrABC incision of these DNA substrates was measured as a function of superhelical density, sigma, for values of sigma between 0 and -0.050. The monoadducted DNA substrate was incised at close to the maximum rate at all superhelical densities, with only a slight stimulation of activity between sigma = 0 and -0.035. In contrast, efficient UvrABC incision of the cross-linked DNA substrate required the DNA to be underwound, and activity showed a linear dependence on superhelical density up to sigma = -0.035. DNase I protection studies show that in the presence of both UvrA and UvrB a protein complex binds to the site of a psoralen monoadduct or cross-link in linear DNA. This UvrA-UvrB-dependent complex binds with similar affinity to both the monoadducted and the cross-linked DNA helices. However, differences in the DNase I footprint on these two DNA substrates indicate that the interaction of this protein complex is different at these two lesions. The addition of UvrC to linear DNA molecules that are saturated at the site of the lesion with the UvrA-UvrB-dependent complex resulted in efficient nicking of the monoadducted DNA, but not the cross-linked DNA. Thus, the properties of a DNA lesion site that lead to UvrAB recognition and binding are not necessarily sufficient to allow incision when all three Uvr subunits are present. We propose that after recognition and binding of a lesion site by the UvrAB complex and prior to incision, the damaged DNA helix undergoes a conformational change such as unwinding or melting that is induced by the lesion-bound Uvr complex.     

Both ATPase sites of Escherichia coli UvrA have functional roles in nucleotide excision repair.

The roles of the two tandemly arranged putative ATP binding sites of Escherichia coli UvrA in UvrABC endonuclease-mediated excision repair were analyzed by site-directed mutagenesis and biochemical characterization of the representative mutant proteins. Evidence is presented that UvrA has two functional ATPase sites which coincide with the putative ATP binding motifs predicted from its amino acid sequence. The individual ATPase sites can independently hydrolyze ATP. The C-terminal ATPase site has a higher affinity for ATP than the N-terminal site. The invariable lysine residues at the ends of the glycine-rich loops of the consensus Walker type "A" motifs are indispensable for ATP hydrolysis. However, the mutations at these lysine residues do not significantly affect ATP binding. UvrA, with bound ATP, forms the most favored conformation for DNA binding. The initial binding of UvrA to DNA is chiefly at the undamaged sites. In contrast to the wild type UvrA, the ATPase site mutants bind equally to damaged and undamaged sites. Dissociation of tightly bound nucleoprotein complexes from the undamaged sites requires hydrolysis of ATP by the C-terminal ATPase site of UvrA. Thus, both ATP binding and hydrolysis are required for the damage recognition step enabling UvrA to discriminate between damaged and undamaged sites on DNA.     

Electron microscopic study of (A)BC excinuclease. DNA is sharply bent in the UvrB-DNA complex.

Nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli is initiated by the UvrA, UvrB and UvrC proteins. UvrA is the damage recognition subunit, makes an A2B1 complex with the targeting subunit UvrB, and the complex binds to the lesion site; UvrA dissociates leaving behind a very stable UvrB-DNA complex that is recognized by the trigger subunit, UvrC, and the ensuing UvrB-UvrC heterodimer makes two incisions, one on either side of the lesion. Using electron microscopy, we investigated the structures of these early A, A-B intermediates on DNA containing ultraviolet light photoproducts. UvrA, which is known to bind to DNA as a dimer and produce a DNase I footprint of 33 base-pairs does not change the trajectory of DNA appreciably. The A2B1 complex clearly shows a bipartite structure and its effect on the trajectory of the DNA was not consistently straight or kinked. In contrast, the DNA in the preincision UvrB-DNA complex appears to be severely kinked; 43% of the molecules are bent by 80 degrees or more, with an average bending angle of 127 degrees. It appears that protein-induced bending is an important step on the pathway leading to excision of the damaged nucleotide by (A)BC excinuclease.     

Superhelical stress restrained in plasmid DNA during repair synthesis initiated by the UvrA, B and C proteins in vitro.

Purified UvrA, UvrB, UvrC, UvrD, PolA and Lig proteins from Escherichia coli have been used to assess the effect of nucleotide excision repair on the conformation of native negatively supercoiled plasmid DNA in an in vitro test system. The analysis of labeled reaction products on specific gel systems suggests that the Uvr excinuclease has the ability to restrain the superhelical stress in the template DNA during the repair process. This feature, observed in the case of the Uvr system is not found if the repair reaction is initiated by T4 endonuclease V or Micrococcus luteus UV endonuclease.     

Isolation and characterization of functional domains of UvrA.

The sequence of Escherichia coli UvrA protein suggests that it may fold into two functional domains each possessing DNA binding and ATPase activities. We have taken two approaches to physically isolate polypeptides corresponding to the two putative domains. First, a 180 base pair DNA segment encoding multiple collagenase recognition sequences was inserted into UvrA's putative interdomain hinge region. This UvrA derivative was purified and digested with collagenase, and the resulting 70-kDa N-terminal and 35-kDa C-terminal fragments were purified. Both fragments possessed nonspecific DNA binding activity, but only the N-terminal domain retained its nucleotide binding capacity as evidence by measurements of ATP hydrolysis and by ATP photo-cross-linking. Together, the two fragments failed to substitute for UvrA in reconstituting (A)BC excinuclease and, therefore, were presumed to be unable to load UvrB onto damaged DNA. Second, the DNA segments encoding the two domains were fused to the beta-galactosidase gene. The UvrA N-terminal domain-beta-galactosidase fusion protein was overproduced and purified. This fusion protein had ATPase activity, thus confirming that the amino-terminal domain does possess an intrinsic ATPase activity independent of any interaction with the carboxy terminus. Our results show that UvrA has two functional domains and that the specificity for binding to damaged DNA is provided by the proper three-dimensional orientation of one zinc finger motif relative to the other and is not an intrinsic property of an individual zinc finger domain.     

Analyzing the handoff of DNA from UvrA to UvrB utilizing DNA-protein photoaffinity labeling

To better define the molecular architecture of nucleotide excision repair intermediates it is necessary to identify the specific domains of UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC that are in close proximity to DNA damage during the repair process. One key step of nucleotide excision repair that is poorly understood is the transfer of damaged DNA from UvrA to UvrB, prior to incision by UvrC. To study this transfer, we have utilized two types of arylazido-modified photoaffinity reagents that probe residues in the Uvr proteins that are closest to either the damaged or non-damaged strands. The damaged strand probes consisted of dNTP analogs linked to a terminal arylazido moiety. These analogs were incorporated into double-stranded DNA using DNA polymerase beta and functioned as both the damage site and the cross-linking reagent. The non-damaged strand probe contained an arylazido moiety coupled to a phosphorothioate-modified backbone of an oligonucleotide opposite the damaged strand, which contained an internal fluorescein adduct. Six site-directed mutants of Bacillus caldotenax UvrB located in different domains within the protein (Y96A, E99A, R123A, R183E, F249A, and D510A), and two domain deletions (Delta2 and Deltabeta-hairpin), were assayed. Data gleaned from these mutants suggest that the handoff of damaged DNA from UvrA to UvrB proceeds in a three-step process: 1) UvrA and UvrB bind to the damaged site, with UvrA in direct contact; 2) a transfer reaction with UvrB contacting mostly the non-damaged DNA strand; 3) lesion engagement by the damage recognition pocket of UvrB with concomitant release of UvrA.     

Crystal structure of the UvrB dimer: insights into the nature and functioning of the UvrAB damage engagement and UvrB-DNA complexes

UvrB has a central role in the highly conserved UvrABC pathway functioning not only as a damage recognition element but also as an essential component of the lesion tracking machinery. While it has been recently confirmed that the tracking assembly comprises a UvrA(2)B(2) heterotetramer, the configurations of the damage engagement and UvrB-DNA handover complexes remain obscure. Here, we present the first crystal structure of a UvrB dimer whose biological significance has been verified using both chemical cross-linking and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. We demonstrate that this dimeric species stably associates with UvrA and forms a UvrA(2)B(2)-DNA complex. Our studies also illustrate how signals are transduced between the ATP and DNA binding sites to generate the helicase activity pivotal to handover and formation of the UvrB(2)-DNA complex, providing key insights into the configurations of these important repair intermediates.