Mechanisms of genetic control of immune responses

We examined multiple genetically regulated Immoral and cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses to poly(glu⁶⁰ala³⁰tyr¹⁰) (GAT) using a panel of mouse strains. We show that assignment of responder/nonresponder status depends upon the assay method. In addition, two distinct categories of nonresponder mice were found: (1) those which are unresponsive by all parameters tested (H-2 ^q and H-2 ^s haplotypes) and (2) those which are partially nonresponsive [H-2 ^bm12 mutant strain—a low/nonresponder by splenic plaque-forming cell (PFC) and delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses, but exhibits B6 parental levels of high GAT-specific T-cell proliferation (Tprlf) and interleukin-2 production]. The distinction between these two nonresponder types was confirmed by complementation tests in which significant GAT-specific PFC and DTH responses were seen in (H-2 ^q × H-2 ^bm12)F₁ hybrids, but not in (H-2 ^q × H-2 ^s )F₁ hybrids. Suppressor T cells (Ts) also play a selective role in nonresponsiveness to GAT. Cyclophosphamide treatment of nonresponders (to eliminate Ts activity) as well as immunization with GAT coupled to the immunogenic carrier MBSA result in the development of GAT-specific humoral, but not CMI responses. Our results indicate that the T cell is the cellular site of Ir gene expression and that Tprlf responses do not correlate with functional helper T-cell activity and suggest distinct, multi-step Th/Ts regulatory pathways in the development of humoral and CMI effector functions.     

Suppressor cell induction in vitro. VI. Production of suppressor factors to synthetic polypeptides GAT and (T,G)-A--L from cells of responder and nonresponder mice.

The capacity of responder and nonresponder strains of mice to generate suppressor cells and factors to two antigens under MHC linked Ir gene control was investigated. Eight different H-2 types (H-2b,d,f,k,p,q,r,s) as well as seven independently derived strains (B10, BALB/c, CBA/Ca, A/St, DBA/2, P/J, SJL) were tested, and all yielded suppressor factor (SF) to (T,G)-A--L and GAT. This indicated that the genetic control of SF production was different from that of helper cell induction. Unlike previous reports of GAT suppressor extracts that GAT-specific supressor factors acted equally on both responder and nonresponder strains. As reported earlier with in vitro induced protein- (KLH) specific suppressor factors, GAT and (T,G)-A--L specific suppressor factors failed to show any genetic restriction in their function. The implications of these results for the general mechanism of Ir gene control are discussed.     

Mechanisms of genetic control of immune responses

The mechanisms underlying Ir gene control of CMI were addressed by examining the DTH and Tprlf responses specific for the synthetic polymers GT, GAT, and GA. We show that BALB/c mice (GAT/GA responders, GT nonresponders) primed with GT fail to develop DTH and Tprlf responses specific for GT, GAT, or GA. GAT immunization resulted in DTH responses that could be elicited not only with GAT and GA but also with GT, demonstrating that GT-specific T_DH are present in nonresponder mice. GT-specific DTH was transferred with Thy-1⁺ Lyt-1⁺2^–, H-2 Irestricted, nylon wool nonadherent cells. GA-primed BALB/c mice developed GAT- and GA-, but not GT-apecific DTH responses, indicating that GA and GT do not cross-react at the T-cell level. The ability of GAT [but not a mixture of GA plus GT, or GT electrostatically complexed to the immunogenic carrier MBSA (GT-MBSA)] to induce GT-specific DTH suggested a requirement for covalent linkage of stimulatory GA and nonstimulatory GT determinants present on the GAT molecule. Similarly, GT-specific in vitro Tprlf responses could be demonstrated in GAT-primed mice exhibiting significant levels of GT-specific DTH but not in GT- or GT-MBSA-primed mice. Tolerization experiments also suggested that GT-specific Th were involved in the development of GT-specific DTH in GAT-primed mice. The GT nonresponsiveness of BALB/c mice for DTH and Tprlf responses could not be reversed by treatments designed to abrogate Ts activity (priming with GT-MBSA and CY injection), nor could GT-primed cells be shown to inhibit the development or elicitation of GT-specific CMI in GAT-primed mice during the afferent and/or efferent stages of DTH. Our results suggest that GT nonresponsiveness does not result from the absence of GT-specific T cells or preferential induction of Ts. The results are discussed in the context of hole-in-the-repertoire and antigen presentation (determinant selection) models of Ir gene control.Abbreviations used in this paper APC antigen-presenting cells - BSA bovine serum albumin - BSS Mishell-Dutton balanced salt solution - CFA complete Freund's adjuvant - CMI cell-mediated immunity - CY cyclophosphamide - DTH delayed-type hypersensitivity - GA poly(Glu⁶⁰Ala⁴⁰) - GAT poly (Glu⁶⁰Ala³⁰Tyr¹⁰) - GT poly(Glu⁵⁰Tyr⁵⁰) - GT-MBSA GT complexed to methylated bovine serum albumin - It immune response - LN lymph node - PPD purified protein derivative of tuberculin - TDH DTH T cells - Th helper T cells - Tprlf T-cell proliferation - Ts suppressor T cells - TsF T-cell suppressor factor(s)     

T cell subsets in (responder x nonresponder)F1 mice regulating antibody responses to L-glutamic acid60-L-alanine30-L-tyrosine (GAT)

Immune responses to GAT are controlled by H-2-linked Ir genes; soluble GAT stimulates antibody responses in responder mice (H-2b) but not in nonresponder mice (H-2q). In nonresponder mice, soluble GAT stimulates suppressor T cells that preempt function of helper T cells. After immunization with soluble GAT, spleen cells from (responder x nonresponder: H-2b X H-2q)F1 mice develop antibody responses to responder H-2b GAT-M phi but not to nonresponder H-2q GAT-M phi. This failure of immune F1 spleen cells to respond is due to an active suppressor T cell mechanism that is activated by H-2q, but not H-2b, GAT-M phi and involves two regulatory T cell subsets. Suppressor-inducer T cells are immune radiosensitive Lyt-1 +2-, I-A-, I-J+, Qa-1+ cells. Suppressor-effector T cells can be derived from virgin or immune spleens and are radiosensitive Lyt-1-2+, I-A-, I-J+, Qa-1+ cells. This suppressor mechanism can suppress responses of virgin or immune F1 helper T cells and B cells. Helper T cells specific for H-2b GAT-M phi are easily detected in F1 mice after immunization with soluble GAT; helper T cells specific for H-2q GAT-M phi are demonstrated after elimination of the suppressor-inducer and -effector cells. These helper T cells are radioresistant Lyt-1+2-, I-A+, I-J-, Qa-1- cells. These data indicate that the Ir gene defect in responses to GAT is not due to a failure of nonresponder M phi to present GAT and most likely is not due to a defective T cell repertoire, because the relevant helper T cells are primed in F1 mice by soluble GAT and can be demonstrated when suppressor cells are removed. These data are discussed in the context of mechanisms for expression of Ir gene function in responses to GAT, especially the balance between stimulation of helper vs suppressor T cells.     

Cellular interactions of L-glutamic acid60-L-alanine30-L-tyrosine10 (GAT)-specific suppressor factors. I. Inhibition of the activity of GAT-specific helper T cell clones by monoclonal GAT-specific suppressor T cell factors

Considerable information concerning the serology and biochemistry of antigen-specific, T cell-derived suppressor factors has been obtained with the use of T cell hybridomas as a source of homogeneous material. Similarly, knowledge of helper T cell products and receptors is accumulating from studies of helper T cell clones and hybridomas. Our strategy for studying the mechanisms by which suppressor factors inhibit responses was to determine whether monoclonal suppressor factors could inhibit antibody responses specific for L-glutamic acid60-L-alanine30-L-tyrosine10 (GAT) in cultures containing unprimed splenic B cells, macrophages, and GAT-specific T cell clones as a source of helper activity. The MHC-restricted, two chain suppressor factors, GAT-TsF2, inhibited these responses if the helper T cell clones and suppressor factor were derived from H-2-compatible mice. Furthermore, responses were inhibited by briefly pulsing T cell clones with GAT-TsF2 in the presence of GAT, indicating that suppressor factors need not be present continuously. In addition, helper T cell clones adsorbed syngeneic, but not allogeneic, GAT-TsF2 in the presence of GAT. Adsorption also requires a shared antigenic specificity between the H-2b-derived helper T cells and TsF2 factor. Thus, helper T cells can serve as the cellular target of antigen-specific, MHC-restricted GAT-TsF2, and cloned helper T cells can be used as a homogeneous target population for analysis of the molecular mechanisms of T cell suppression.     

Regulation of immune responses by T cell subsets. Role of helper and suppressor T cells in the development and expression of MHC-restricted antibody responses to L-glutamic acid60-L-alanine30-L-tyrosine10 (GAT) by (responder X responder)F1 spleen cells

The roles of helper and suppressor T cells in the development and expression of antibody responses to GAT were studied in (responder X responder)F1 mice immunized with parental GAT-M phi. Spleen cells from (B10 X B10.D2)F1 mice primed in vivo with B10 or B10.D2 GAT-M phi developed secondary in vitro plaque-forming cell (PFC) responses only when stimulated by GAT-M phi syngeneic with the GAT-M phi used for in vivo priming. By contrast, virgin F1 spleen cells developed comparable primary PFC responses to both parental GAT-M phi Co-culture of T cells from (B10 X B10.D2)F1 mice primed in vivo by B10 GAT-M phi with virgin (B10 X B10.D2)F1 spleen cells demonstrated the presence of suppressor cells that inhibited the primary response of virgin spleen cells stimulated by B10.D2 GAT-M phi. Spleen cells from (B10 X B10.D2)F1 mice primed in vivo with B10.D2 GAT-M phi had suppressor T cells that suppressed primary responses stimulated by B10 GAT-M phi. The suppressor T cell mechanism was composed of at least two regulatory T cell subsets. Suppressor-inducer T cells were Lyt-2-, I-J+ and must be derived from immune spleen cells. Suppressor-effector T cells can be derived from virgin or immune spleens and were Lyt-2+ cells. When the suppressor mechanism was disabled by treatment with 1000 rad gamma irradiation or removal of Lyt-2+ cells, Lyt-2-helper T cells from (B10 X B10.D2)F1 mice primed with B10 GAT-M phi provided radioresistant help to virgin F1 B cells stimulated by B10 but not B10.D2 GAT-M phi. Suppressor inducer Lyt-2-,I-J+ cells from B10 GAT-M phi-primed (B10 X B10.D2)F1 mice were separated from the primed Lyt-2-,I-J-helper T cells. In the presence of Lyt-2+ suppressor effector cells, the Lyt-2-,I-J+ suppressor-inducer suppressed the primary response of virgin spleen or virgin T plus B cells stimulated by both B10 and B10.D2 GAT-M phi. Therefore, suppressor T cells were able to suppress primary but not secondary GAT-specific PFC responses stimulated by either parental GAT-M phi. These results showed that immunization of (responder X responder)F1 mice with parental GAT-M phi results in the development of antigen-specific helper and suppressor T cells. The primed helper T cells were radioresistant and were genetically restricted to interact with GAT in association with the major histocompatibility complex antigens of the M phi used for in vivo priming.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Monoclonal antibodies specific for single chain or two chain GAT-specific suppressor factors: production and analysis of in vitro modulating properties

Fusion of spleen cells from rats hyperimmunized with T cell hybridoma derived GAT-specific TsF1 or TsF2 suppressor T cell factors has resulted in the generation of hybridomas secreting monoclonal antibodies reactive with the appropriate GAT-TsF used for immunization, and in several cases, reactive with other GAT-TsF1 and TsF2. The monoclonal anti-TsF1 antibodies are capable of modulating in vitro GAT-specific PFC response in a GAT-specific manner; some suppress responses to GAT directly, whereas others reverse GAT-TsF1-mediated suppression of responses. The monoclonal anti-TsF2 antibodies all reverse suppression but are reactive with combinatorial determinants, I-J+ chains or antigen-binding chains of the GAT-TsF2. The data are discussed in terms of the nature of the determinants recognized by these antibodies as well as the potential uses of these reagents for studying the suppressor T cell pathway and potential relationships between Ts1, Ts2, and T helper cells.     

Immune response to the p-azobenzenearsonate (ABA)-GAT conjugate. II. Hapten-specific T cells induced with ABA-GAT in GAT responder X nonresponder F1 hybrids are restricted to the nonresponder haplotype

Immunization of mice with the ABA-GAT conjugate stimulates GAT-specific T helper cells in GAT-responder animals and ABA-specific helpers in nonresponders. Unexpectedly, immunization of (responder X nonresponder) F1 mice, which have the GAT-responder phenotype, leads to the recruitment of both ABA- and GAT-specific clones of T helper lymphocytes. The GAT-reactive population is restricted to the haplotype of the responder parent (Iak), whereas ABA-specific T cells are mostly restricted to the nonresponder one (Ias). This is demonstrated by the ability of monoclonal antibodies to parental la antigens to inhibit T cell proliferation to GAT or ABA-Tyr in vitro. Consistently, ABA-GAT-primed F1 T cells can only activate nonresponder B cells to proliferate in the presence of ABA-Tyr and responder B lymphocytes in the presence of GAT. Furthermore, F1 T cells seem to recognize both ABA and GAT epitopes only in association with molecules encoded by the I-A subregion. Analysis of ABA-specific F1 T cell lines generated by in vitro stimulation with ABA-Tyr or ABA-GAT demonstrates a competition between GAT- and ABA-specific T cells present in the hybrid T cell repertoire and restricted to the same parental I-Ak molecule. The results indicate that F1 macrophages can present both ABA and GAT epitopes to T cells in association with the two parental and hybrid Ia determinants. It seems unlikely that the absence of GAT-specific T cells restricted to the nonresponder I-A in the F1 is due to suppressor T cells. Thus, the competition model that we propose, to explain the selective F1 T cell response to ABA-GAT, leads us to believe that GAT nonresponder animals may lack clones capable of recognizing, with a high affinity, I-As + GAT.     

Genetic restrictions in the development of antibody responses to L-glutamic acid60-L-alanine30-L-tyrosine10 by nude mice implanted with semiallogeneic thymus glands

Athymic nude mice implanted with F1 thymus glands were used to investigate genetic restrictions regulating T cell-macrophage (M phi) interactions in the development of antibody responses to GAT. Spleen cells from conventional mice developed comparable primary plaque-forming cell (PFC) responses when stimulated by syngeneic and allogeneic GAT-M phi. However, spleen cells from strain A nude mice implanted with (A X B)F1 thymus glands were tolerant of strain B alloantigens and developed GAT-specific PFC responses to strain A GAT-M phi and allogeneic strain C GAT-M phi, but failed to respond to strain B GAT-M phi. The lack of primary GAT-specific PFC responses by spleen cells from (A X B)thy----A nude mice stimulated by strain B GAT-M phi was not due to detectable suppressor mechanisms. However, an allogeneic effect stimulated by H-2- or non-H-2-disparate GAT-pulsed or unpulsed M phi was able to overcome the inability of spleen cells from (A X B)F1 thy----A nude mice to respond to strain B GAT-M phi. Furthermore, the inability to respond to strain B GAT-M phi was overcome by the addition of supernatant fluids from independent cultures of H-2-disparate cells. These results 1) demonstrate that T cells from A nude mice implanted with (A X B)F1 thymus glands did not recognize nominal antigen in the context of B MHC antigens, and 2) suggested that the T cell repertoire was altered in strain A nude mice implanted with (A X B)F1 thymus glands, such that T cells that could recognize GAT in association with strain B MHC antigens were functionally deleted.     

Suppressor T cell circuits in contact sensitivity. III. A monoclonal T cell hybrid-derived suppressor factor specifically suppresses local DTH transfer by a DNP-specific T cell clone

Herein we described the direct suppressive effects of a monoclonal T cell hybridoma-derived, DNP-specific suppressor T cell factor (26.10.2 TsF) on the local transfer of delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) by a DNP-specific BALB/c T cell clone (dD1.9). The L3T4+, Lyt-2- dD1.9 T cell clone proliferated in response to DNP-OVA and DNBS, but not TNP-OVA or TNBS, in association with I-Ed determinants present on antigen-presenting cells. Similarly, local injection of histopaque-purified dD1.9 cell blasts resulted in DNP-specific, radioresistant, I-Ed-restricted, mononuclear cell-rich ear swelling responses. Incubation in 26.10.2 TsF specifically suppressed local transfer of DNP-specific DTH by dD1.9, but not local DTH responses transferred by BALB/c T cell clones specific for TNP or GAT. The suppressive effect of 26.10.2 TsF correlated with targeting on DNP-major histocompatibility complex determinants associated with the DTH T cell (TDH) targets. 26.10.2 TsF-mediated suppression was most pronounced after exposure of dD1.9 target cells to antigen (after the stimulation phase of the T cell clone maintenance procedure), and greatly reduced when dD1.9 was cultured for long periods in the absence of DNP (after the rest phase of clone maintenance). In additional support of this hypothesis, GAT-specific TDH, normally resistant to 26.10.2 TsF-mediated suppression, were rendered susceptible to suppression after surface DNPylation. The results demonstrate a direct, antigen-specific, effector phase regulatory effect of a monoclonal TsF on a cloned, antigen-specific T cell target, and strongly suggest that suppression is mediated via targeting on DNP determinants associated with the TDH target. Simplification of complex Ts circuitry operating in suppression of the efferent limb of DTH by the use of monoclonal TsF and cloned T cell targets should provide a basis for the future study of the molecular mechanisms of immune suppression.     

Characterization of L-glutamic acid60-L-alanine30-L-tyrosine10-specific suppressor T cells in responder mice restricted by Igh-C-linked genes

A Ts cell subset has been identified in the spleens of responder mice 3 to 6 wk after immunization with an optimally immunogenic dose of L-glutamic acid60-L-alanine30-L-tyrosine10 (GAT). These Ts were positively selected by panning procedures by using a mAb (1248 A4.10) produced by immunization of rats with semipurified mouse GAT-specific, single polypeptide chain suppressor factor. These Ts cells inhibited the activity of virgin Th cells but not memory Th cells and this activity was genetically restricted by genes which are linked to the Ig H chain (Igh) locus on chromosome 12. Use of the Igh recombination strain, BAB.14, which has a crossover near the VHCH region junction, demonstrated that the genes regulating the Igh restriction map telomeric to the VH genes. The Igh-linked restriction regulated the interaction of A4.10+ Ts cells with virgin T cells and not B cells. However, A4.10+ Ts did not act directly on Lyt-2-Th cells, but required the presence of Lyt-2+ cells for suppression. Suppression by GAT-primed A4.10+-Ts cells also required syngenicity at Igh-linked genes by both Lyt-2- and Lyt-2+ T cells. These results indicated that A4.10+-Ts cells were inducer Ts cells which activated Lyt-2+ effector Ts cells which prevented primary GAT specific Th cell activity. The interaction between A4.10+-Ts inducer and effector Ts cells and/or the interaction of the effector Ts and its target cell were restricted by genes linked to the Igh constant region.     

Characterization of Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV)-specific delayed-type hypersensitivity responses in TMEV-induced demyelinating disease: correlation with clinical signs

After intracerebral inoculation of Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV), certain mouse strains develop a persistent central nervous system (CNS) infection and inflammatory demyelinating lesions containing infiltrates of mononuclear cells and macrophages. Previous findings demonstrating a strong correlation between disease incidence, the presence of particular H-2 region genotypes, and development of high levels of TMEV-specific delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) supported an immune-mediated basis for myelin breakdown. These findings led us to examine whether a possible causal relationship would be supported by a temporal analysis comparing the onset of clinical disease and the development of TMEV-specific cellular or humoral immune responses in susceptible and resistant strains. In susceptible SJL/J mice, TMEV-specific DTH and T cell proliferative (Tprlf) responses developed within 10 to 14 days postinfection, preceded the onset of clinical signs, and remained elevated for 6 mo. In contrast, resistant BALB/c mice developed low levels of TMEV-specific Tprlf and no measurable DTH. However, both strains attained comparable levels of TMEV-specific serum antibody responses with parallel kinetics. Both DTH and Tprlf responses in susceptible SJL/J mice were shown to be specific for TMEV and mediated by L3T4+, Lyt-1+2-, class II-restricted T cells. A model is proposed implicating an effector role for TMEV-specific DTH, wherein lymphokine release by virus-specific DTH T cells leads to the recruitment, accumulation, and activation of macrophages in CNS tissue, which cause bystander myelin destruction and provide a permissive population of host cells for TMEV persistence.     

Epitope-specific regulation in Ir gene systems. I. Conditions for the induction of epitope-specific suppressors to poly(Glu60Ala30Tyr10)

Injection of responder mice with poly(Glu60Ala30Tyr10) (GAT) followed by immunization with GAT-methylated bovine serum albumin (GATMBSA) selectively suppresses anti-MBSA plaque-forming cell (PFC) and delayed hypersensitivity (DTH) reactions. Conversely, MBSA injection followed by GATMBSA immunization suppresses anti-GAT PFC and DTH, while anti-MBSA responses remain intact. Suppression occurs for doses of antigen which are optimally immunogenic. The suppression is specific and does not act in a bystander fashion. These results demonstrate that epitope-specific regulation is reciprocal, is not limited to humoral responses, and is not limited to molecules of low molecular weight.     

Genetic control of immune responses to the 18-kDa protein of Mycobacterium leprae. Different TH1 subsets may be involved in proliferative and delayed-type hypersensitivity responses.

In vitro and in vivo responses to the 18-kDa protein of Mycobacterium leprae have been analysed in different strains of mice. Lymphocytes from BALB/cJ (H-2d), BALB.B (H-2b), B10.BR (H-2k), and B10.M (H-2f) mice primed with 18-kDa protein yielded high T cell proliferative responses, while those from C57BL/10J (H-2b) mice yielded lower responses. Both H-2 and non-H-2 genes contributed to the magnitude of responsiveness. F1 mice from high and low responder strains showed high responsiveness to the 18-kDa protein. Supernatants from lymph node cell cultures prepared from 18-kDa protein-immunised BALB/cJ, B10.BR, and C57BL/10J mice contained IL-2 but no IL-4, indicating that activated T cells from both high and low responder mice were of a TH1 phenotype. Cell cultures from low responder C57BL/10J mice produced less IL-2 than those from high responders. The low responsiveness to the 18-kDa protein in proliferative assays might be due to a low frequency of antigen-specific T cells in the C57BL/10J mouse strain. BALB/cJ, C57BL/10J, and F1 (BALB/cJ x B10.BR) mouse strains were tested for in vivo DTH reactions to the 18-kDa protein. All strains, including C57BL/10J, were high DTH responders. Although DTH effector cells and 18-kDa protein-specific proliferative T cells belong to the TH1 subset, our data comparing high and low responder status indicate that distinct TH1 subpopulations are stimulated in response to the 18-kDa protein of M. leprae.     

The functional helper T cell repertoire specific for L-glutamic acid60-L-alanine30-L-tyrosine10 (GAT)

Experiments have been carried out to examine the potential helper T cell repertoire specific for the random terpolymer GAT on responder, nonresponder, and (responder x nonresponder)F1 murine strains. The ability of GAT-MBSA immunized T cells to collaborate with DNP-specific primary and secondary B lymphocytes of each strain in response to the antigen DNP-GAT was tested with the splenic fragment culture system. The results of these experiments show that there are GAT-specific T lymphocytes in the responder, nonresponder, and F1 strains but that these 3 GAT-specific T cell populations differ in their collaborative potential. In sum, these findings present new evidence that the nonresponder status to the terpolymer GAT is due, in part, to a functional deletion of helper T cells capable of recognizing the antigen in the context of the nonresponder haplotype. Further, a new responsive phenotype is evidenced when F1 secondary B cells are stimulated in nonresponder GAT-MBSA-primed recipients. In this case, rather than the IgG1 responses observed in such strain combinations to other antigens such as DNP-Hy or DNP-Gl phi 9, only IgM responses were obtained. This new phenotype may be the result of GAT-specific suppression of isotype switching by B cells bearing the nonresponder cell surface alloantigens.     

Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV)-induced demyelinating disease in mice is influenced by the H-2D region: correlation with TEMV-specific delayed-type hypersensitivity

Intracranial inoculation of Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV) leads to the development of a chronic demyelinating disorder in certain mouse strains. Development of this disease is controlled by at least two unlinked genes, one of which is within or linked to the H-2 complex. In the present study, we attempted to map the relevant H-2 loci involved in susceptibility to TMEV-induced demyelination using crosses between SJL and several congenic H-2 recombinant mouse strains bearing different combinations of MHC genes from the susceptible H-2s and resistant H-2b haplotypes all on the C57BL/10 strain background. The data suggest that the D region of the H-2 complex strongly influences development of the demyelinating disease because increased susceptibility correlates well with homozygosity for H-2s alleles in the D region, but not in K or I-A. In addition, we also attempted to correlate certain immune and nonimmune pathophysiologic parameters with the development of clinical disease. Specifically, central nervous system TMEV titers and TMEV-specific humoral and cellular [delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) and T cell proliferative (Tprlf)] responses were examined. The data show that TMEV-induced demyelinating disease did not correlate with either CNS TMEV titers or TMEV-specific humoral or Tprlf responses but did correlate closely with the presence of high levels of TMEV-specific DTH. Collectively, our findings demonstrating a strong correlation between disease incidence, the presence of particular H-2D region genotypes, and high levels of TMEV-specific DTH in susceptible strains (as well as previous findings showing predominant mononuclear cell infiltrates in CNS demyelinating lesions) support the hypothesis that the disease is immune mediated rather than a result of direct cytolytic effects of virus infection.     

Immune dysfunction associated with graft-vs-host reaction in mice transplanted across minor histocompatibility barriers. II. Reversible defect in T-dependent antibody responses

B cell and Th cell functions were assessed in mice undergoing a graft-vs-host reaction (GvHR) in response to minor histocompatibility Ag by using the plaque-forming cell (PFC) response to the T-independent Ag TNP-Brucella abortus and the T-dependent Ag TNP-SRBC. Bone marrow plus spleen cells from B10.D2 mice were transplanted into lethally irradiated B10.D2 (syngeneic recipient) or H-2d-compatible BALB/c (allogeneic recipient) to produce a chronic form of GvHR. BALB/c recipients of an allogeneic transplant demonstrated a marked and proportional lymphoid depletion of the spleen with normal percentages of B cells, T cells, and CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets. Mice with GvHR made normal numbers of PFC/10(5) spleen cells in response to the T-independent Ag, but a significantly depressed number of PFC/10(5) spleen cells to the T-dependent Ag compared with normal B10.D2 mice and with irradiated B10.D2 recipients of syngeneic B10.D2 marrow plus spleen cells. Mice undergoing the minor Ag GvHR made significantly larger numbers of PFC/10(5) spleen cells after secondary immunization with TNP-SRBC compared with controls. In vitro assays demonstrated that B cells from mice with GvHR responded to T help from normal B10.D2 mice and that T cells from mice with GvHR provided help to normal B cells after in vivo immunization. These data demonstrate that radiation chimeras with GvHR in response to minor histocompatibility Ag have relatively normal B cell function and an apparent defect in T helper cell function that is reversible by immunization with appropriate Ag.     

T cell subsets regulating antibody responses to L-glutamic acid60-L-alanine30-L-tyrosine10 (GAT) in virgin and immunized nonresponder mice

T cell subsets from virgin and immunized mice, which are Ir gene controlled nonresponders to GAT, which regulate antibody responses to GAT have been characterized. Virgin nonresponder B10.Q B cells develop GAT-specific antibody responses to GAT, B10.Q GAT-M phi, and GAT-MBSA when cultured with virgin or GAT-primed Lyt-1+, I-J-, Qa1- B10.Q helper T cells. Virgin T cells are radiosensitive, whereas immune T cells are radioresistant (750 R); qualitatively identical helper activity is obtained with T cells from mice immunized with soluble GAT, B10.Q GAT-M phi, and GAT-MBSA. Responses to GAT and GAT-M phi are not observed when virgin or GAT-primed Lyt-1+, I-J+, Qal+ T cells are added to culture of virgin or GAT-primed Lyt-1+, I-J-, Qa1- helper T cells and virgin B cells; the GAT-specific response to GAT-MBSA is intact. The Lyt-1+, I-J+, Qa1+ T cells from mice primed with GAT, GAT-M phi, and GAT-MBSA were qualitatively identical in mediating this suppression. Virgin Lyt-2+ T cells have no suppressive activity alone or with virgin Lyt-1+, I-J+, Qa1+ T cells, whereas responses to GAT, GAT-M phi, and GAT-MBSA are suppressed in cultures of GAT-primed helper T cells containing GAT-primed Lyt-2+ T cells (with or without GAT-primed Lyt-1+, I-J+, Qa1+ T cells). Suppression of responses to GAT-MBSA in cultures of GAT-M phi-primed helper T cells requires both GAT-M phi-primed Lyt-1+, I-J+, Qa1+ T cells and Lyt-2+ T cells; the Lyt-1+, I-J+, Qa1+ T cells appear to function as inducer cells in this case. In cultures containing GAT-MBSA-primed helper T cells, either GAT-MBSA-primed Lyt-1+, I-J+, Qa1+ or Lyt-2+ T cells suppress responses to GAT and GAT-M phi; under no circumstances are responses to GAT-MBSA suppressed by GAT-MBSA-primed regulatory T cells. This regulation of antibody responses to GAT by suppressor T cells is discussed in the context of the involvement of suppressor T cells in responses to antigens under Ir control, and of the evidence that nonresponsiveness to GAT is not due to a defect in the T cell repertoire, but rather is due to an imbalance in the activation of suppressor vs helper T cells.     

Identification of suppressor T cells in virgin non-responder spleen cells responsible for primary unresponsiveness to L-glutamic acid60-L-alanine30-L-tyrosine10 (GAT)

T cell subsets that regulate antibody responses to L-glutamic acid60-L-alanine30-L-tyrosine10 (GAT) in mice that are Ir gene non-responders have been further characterized. We previously defined several T cell subsets in GAT-primed non-responder mice. The Lyt-2+ suppressor-effector T cells suppress responses to GAT and GAT complexed to methylated BSA (GAT-MBSA). The Lyt-1+ cell population is complex and can be separated into I-J- Th cells, which support responses to GAT and GAT-MBSA. After priming, the Lyt-1+, I-J+ cell population contains suppressor-inducer cells that activate precursors of suppressor-effector cells to suppress responses to GAT and GAT-MBSA as well as Ts cells that directly inhibit responses to GAT but not GAT-MBSA. By contrast, the Lyt-1+ cells from virgin mice contain only cells that directly suppress responses to GAT but not GAT-MBSA. The major question addressed in the present studies was whether the Lyt-1+, I-J+ Ts cells in virgin and primed mice and the suppressor-inducer cells in GAT-primed mice were functionally and serologically distinct subsets. The studies used mAb and panning procedures to separate cell populations and inhibition of PFC cell responses to functionally define the activity of the cell populations. We used the following two mAb that were raised by immunizing rats with GAT-specific suppressor factors: 1248A4.10 (known to react with suppressor-inducer cells) and 1248A4.3, another reagent from the same fusion. Lyt-1+ cells from virgin spleens contained Ts cells that were A4.10-, A4.3+ and no suppressor-inducer T cells, whereas Lyt-1+ cells from GAT-primed spleens contained Ts cells that were A4.10-, A4.3+ as well as A4.10+, A4.3- suppressor-inducer cells. Thus, the Lyt1+, I-J+ cell subset can be divided into two functionally and serologically distinct subsets, direct Ts cells (1248A4.3+), which suppress responses to GAT but not GAT-MBSA, and GAT-primed suppressor-inducer T cells (1248A4.10+).     

Induction and characterization of minor histocompatibility antigens. Specific primary cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses in vitro

A definite cytotoxic activity was developed in a BALB/c (H-2d) anti-DBA/2 primary mixed leukocyte culture (MLC), which received interleukin 2 (IL-2) on day 3 of culture. This cytotoxic activity was minor histocompatibility antigens (MIHA)-specific at the stimulator level, and was not developed in a syngeneic (BALB/c anti-BALB/c) MLC. The addition of IL-2 on day 3 of culture was crucial; no or very weak cytotoxic activity was developed in MLC receiving IL-2 on day 0 or on both day 0 and day 3. Only appropriate MIHA-allogeneic tumor cells were lysed as the target of the cytotoxic activity. The cytotoxic activity seemed MIHA-specific also at the target level; it lysed tumor cells of DBA/2 mouse origin but not those of BALB/c (syngeneic) origin. Phenotypes of the cytotoxic effector cell were Thy-1+ Lyt-2+. We concluded from these results that MIHA-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) were generated in the MIHA-allogeneic primary MLC. In this newly developed system, we studied genetic and antigenic requirements for primary anti-MIHA CTL responses in vitro. We demonstrated; among spleen cells (SC) of seven B10 H-2-congenic strains only SC of B10.D2 strain whose major histocompatibility complex (MHC) (H-2d) was compatible with the responder MHC effectively stimulated responder BALB/c (H-2d) SC for an anti-MIHA (DBA-C57BL-common) CTL response. Similarly, only SC of two out of seven C x B recombinant inbred strains (C x B.H and C x B.D), which were compatible at the MHC with responder SC, activated responder BALB/c SC for the response. The possibility that cells responding to H-2 alloantigens suppressed the anti-MIHA response was ruled out. Additional experiments showed that compatibility at the H-2K-end or the H-2D-end of the MHC was sufficient for a definite anti-MIHA response. These provided formal evidence that primary anti-MIHA CTL responses in vitro were MHC-restricted at the stimulator level. We then showed that sonication-disrupted SC or Sephadex G-10 column-passed nonadherent SC failed to stimulate responder SC for a primary anti-MIHA CTL response, whereas G-10-passed nonadherent SC responded well to adherent stimulator cells. Further study demonstrated that Ia+ adherent cells were the most active cell type as stimulator. Finally, we confirmed that the primary anti-MIHA CTL responses to adherent stimulator cells was MHC-restricted.