Epigenetic selection: an alternative mechanism of pattern formation

It is commonly assumed that patterned development is specified by pre-patterns or programs, actual development being a necessary consequence of previous conditions. However, the variability of normal development and its regenerative capacities are evidence for additional patterning processes. Predictable mature structures could result from continued "epigenetic selection" of the most appropriate developmental events. This selection would occur from an excess of possibilities that are genetically equivalent. The final balanced state would be specified by the genes, and the developmental system could gravitate towards this state without a detailed program. Selection could result from competition between cells and tissues for limiting developmental signals. The success or continuation of events that could start randomly would depend on feedback relationships with complementary developmental events. Specialized processes could be gradually localized if differentiation itself consumed limiting signals and if this consumption increased as differentiation proceeded. Spatial patterns could be formed if the movement of signals was gradually facilitated along the axes where it were initiated by diffusion. For example, induced facilitated transport could be the basis of an advantage of multicellular centers over scattered cells that have specialized in the same way. If epigenetic selection has a developmental role it requires a revision of common views concerning the cellular traits and the gene functions necessary for patterned development. An example of these traits is that cells should be expected to respond to changes in signal availability, not necessarily to signal concentration at any given time.     

Molecular Genetics and the Ontogeny of Pigment Patterns in Mammals

The conclusion that animal development is guided by a hierarchical system of gene expression and interaction has gained considerable support from recent molecular genetic studies on fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster) and mice (Mus musculus). They demonstrate that the patterns of organization revealed by terminal differentiation of cells is anticipated by a myriad of transient prepatterns that channel the developing embryo toward its genetically-programmed target. The numerous white spotting mutants in mice exhibit some of the most dramatic and variable patterns of cutaneous melanin pigmentation. Until recently, the mechanisms of action of white spotting genes and their relationship to the developmental genetic hierarchy remained unknown. It now appears that certain white spotting genes may encode growth factors essential for melanoblast development. Others may be related to homeobox genes that play a number of developmental roles, the primary one being the determination of regional organization along the anterior-posterior axis of the early embryo. The patterns of homeobox gene expression are consistent with several of the developmental models for white spotting in mice and other mammals. It is evident that white spotting genes are not solely concerned with the terminal differentiation of melanoblasts into melanocytes. They are heterogeneous with regard to action and level of expression within the developmental hierarchy.     

H2AZ is enriched at polycomb complex target genes in ES cells and is necessary for lineage commitment

Elucidating how chromatin influences gene expression patterns and ultimately cell fate is fundamental to understanding development and disease. The histone variant H2AZ has emerged as a key regulator of chromatin function and plays an essential but unknown role during mammalian development. Here, genome-wide analysis reveals that H2AZ occupies the promoters of developmentally important genes in a manner that is remarkably similar to that of the Polycomb group (PcG) protein Suz12. By using RNAi, we demonstrate a role for H2AZ in regulating target gene expression, find that H2AZ and PcG protein occupancy is interdependent at promoters, and further show that H2AZ is necessary for ES cell differentiation. Notably, H2AZ occupies a different subset of genes in lineage-committed cells, suggesting that its dynamic redistribution is necessary for cell fate transitions. Thus, H2AZ, together with PcG proteins, may establish specialized chromatin states in ES cells necessary for the proper execution of developmental gene expression programs.     

PRC2 during vertebrate organogenesis: a complex in transition

During organogenesis, tissues expand in size and eventually acquire consistent ratios of cells with dazzling diversity in morphology and function. During this process progenitor cells exit the cell cycle and execute differentiation programs through extensive genetic reprogramming that involves the silencing of proliferation genes and the activation of differentiation genes in a step-wise temporal manner. Recent years have witnessed expansion in our understanding of the epigenetic mechanisms that contribute to cellular differentiation and maturation during organ development, as this is a crucial step toward advancing regenerative therapy research for many intractable disorders. Among such epigenetic programs, the developmental roles of the polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), a chromatin remodeling complex that mediates silencing of gene expression, have been under intensive examination. This review summarizes recent findings of how PRC2 functions to regulate the transition from proliferation to differentiation during organogenesis and discusses some aspects of the remaining questions associated with its regulation and mechanisms of action.     

Proto-oncogenes in mammalian development.

The phenotypic analysis of mice carrying germline mutations in protooncogenes is beginning to provide convincing genetic evidence for the important role that these genes play in mammalian development and differentiation. Two approaches are being taken to elucidate the biological function of proto-oncogenes in vivo. The first involves the molecular analysis of existing mouse developmental mutants, while the second approach involves the generation of specific germline mutations by gene targeting using homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells. Several key points have already emerged from these genetic approaches. First, many proto-oncogenes are important to more than one cell lineage and function both during embryogenesis and in the adult. Second, the patterns of expression of these genes provide only a guide to their biological function. Third, mutant phenotypes are generally less severe than would be expected from their expression patterns, suggesting that there may be functional overlap between two or more members of a gene family.     

Geminin Coordinates Cell Cycle and Developmental Control

Growth and differentiation are two major themes in embryonic development. Numerous cell divisions have to be regulated on the path from a unicellular embryo, the zygote, to the multicellular structures of a mature being. Numerous functions, specializations and cellular identities have to be generated, in order to form a complex and mature animal. Numerous mechanisms have to control the correct assignment and acquisition of cellular fates, as well as the right timing and allocation of cells. Therefore, a strict coordination has to occur between embryonic patterning and the cell cycle. From this point of view, dual roles or mutual interactions of typical proliferation and developmental control genes are likely. Recently, new light was shed on these issues by identifying the nuclear protein Geminin as a molecular coordinator between the cell cycle and axial patterning. We summarize the role of Geminin in cell cycle, in the embryonic patterning controlled by Hox genes, providing insights into cell cycle regulators in embryonic development, and, conversely, typical developmental control genes in cell cycle regulation.     

The nuclear receptor gene nhr-25 plays multiple roles in the Caenorhabditis elegans heterochronic gene network to control the larva-to-adult transition

Developmental timing in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is controlled by heterochronic genes, mutations in which cause changes in the relative timing of developmental events. One of the heterochronic genes, let-7, encodes a microRNA that is highly evolutionarily conserved, suggesting that similar genetic pathways control developmental timing across phyla. Here we report that the nuclear receptor nhr-25, which belongs to the evolutionarily conserved fushi tarazu-factor 1/nuclear receptor NR5A subfamily, interacts with heterochronic genes that regulate the larva-to-adult transition in C. elegans. We identified nhr-25 as a regulator of apl-1, a homolog of the Alzheimer's amyloid precursor protein-like gene that is downstream of let-7 family microRNAs. NHR-25 controls not only apl-1 expression but also regulates developmental progression in the larva-to-adult transition. NHR-25 negatively regulates the expression of the adult-specific collagen gene col-19 in lateral epidermal seam cells. In contrast, NHR-25 positively regulates the larva-to-adult transition for other timed events in seam cells, such as cell fusion, cell division and alae formation. The genetic relationships between nhr-25 and other heterochronic genes are strikingly varied among several adult developmental events. We propose that nhr-25 has multiple roles in both promoting and inhibiting the C. elegans heterochronic gene pathway controlling adult differentiation programs.     

Ultrabithorax is a regulator of beta 3 tubulin expression in the Drosophila visceral mesoderm.

beta 3 tubulin expression accompanies the specification and differentiation of the Drosophila mesoderm. The genetic programs involved in these processes are largely unknown. Our previous studies on the regulation of the beta 3 tubulin gene have shown that upstream sequences guide the expression in the somatic musculature, while regulatory elements in the first intron are necessary for expression in the visceral musculature. To further analyse this mode of regulation, which reflects an early embryonic specification program, we undertook a more detailed analysis of the regulatory capabilities of the intron. The results reveal not only a certain degree of redundancy in the cis-acting elements, which act at different developmental stages in the same mesodermal derivatives, but they also demonstrate in the visceral mesoderm, which forms a continuous epithelium along the body axis of the embryo, an early action of regulators guiding gene expression along the anterior-posterior axis of the embryo: an enhancer element in the intron leads to expression in a subdomain restricted along the anterior-posterior axis. This pattern is altered in mutants in the homeotic gene Ultrabithorax (Ubx), whereas ectopic Ubx expression leads to activity of the enhancer in the entire visceral mesoderm. So this element is likely to be a target of homeotic genes, which would define the beta 3 tubulin gene as a realisator gene under the control of selector genes.     

A cluster of Drosophila homeobox genes involved in mesoderm differentiation programs

Although genes involved in common developmental programs are usually scattered throughout the metazoan genome, there are some important examples of functionally interconnected regulatory genes that display close physical linkage. In particular the homeotic genes, which determine the identities of body parts, are clustered in the Hox complexes and clustering is thought to be crucial for the proper execution of their developmental programs. Here we describe the organization and functional properties of a more recently identified cluster of six homeobox genes at 93DE on the third chromosome of Drosophila. These genes, which include tinman, bagpipe, ladybird early, ladybird late, C15, and slouch, all participate in mesodermal patterning and differentiation programs and show multiple regulatory interactions among each other. We propose that their clustering, through unknown mechanisms, is functionally significant and discuss the similarities and differences between the 93DE homeobox gene cluster and the Hox complexes.     

Identification and molecular characterization of novel anther-specific genes in Oryza sativa L. by using cDNA microarray

The complicated genetic pathway regulates the developmental programs of male reproductive organ, anther tissues. To understand these molecular mechanisms, we performed cDNA microarray analyses and in situ hybridization to monitor gene expression patterns during anther development in rice. Microarray analysis of 4,304 cDNA clones revealed that the hybridization signal of 396 cDNA clones (271 non-redundant groups) increased more than six-fold in every stage of the anthers compared with that of leaves. Cluster analysis with the expression data showed that 259 cDNA clones (156 non redundant groups) were specifically or predominantly expressed in anther tissues and were regulated by developmental stage-specific manners in the anther tissues. These co-regulated genes would be important for development of functional anther tissues. Furthermore, we selected several clones for RNA in situ hybridization analysis. From these analyses, we found several novel genes that show temporal and spatial expression patterns during anther development in addition to anther-specific genes reported so far. These results indicate that the genes identified in this experiment are controlled by different programs and are specialized in their developmental and cell types.     

Cell cycle and differentiation

The development of multicellular organisms relies on the temporal and spatial control of cell proliferation and cell growth. The relationship between cell-cycle progression and development is complex and characterized by mutual dependencies. On the level of the individual cell, this interrelationship has implications for pattern formation and cell morphogenesis. On a supercellular level, this interrelationship affects meristem function and organ growth. Often, developmental signals not only direct cell-cycle progression but also set the frame for cell-cycle regulation by determining cell-type-specific cell-cycle modes. In other cases, however, cell-cycle progression appears to be required for the further differentiation of some cell types. There are also examples in which cell cycle and differentiation seem to be controlled at the same level and progress rather independently from each other or are linked by the same regulator or pathway. Furthermore, different relationships between cell cycle and differentiation can be combined in a succession of events during development, leading to complex developmental programs.