Crystal structure of human antibody 2909 reveals conserved features of quaternary structure-specific antibodies that potently neutralize HIV-1

Monoclonal antibody 2909 belongs to a class of potently neutralizing antibodies that recognize quaternary epitopes on HIV-1. Some members of this class, such as 2909, are strain specific, while others, such as antibody PG16, are broadly neutralizing; all, however, recognize a region on the gp120 envelope glycoprotein that includes two loops (V2 and V3) and forms appropriately only in the oligomeric HIV-1 spike (gp120₃/gp41₃). Here we present the crystal structure of 2909 and report structure-function analysis with antibody chimeras composed of 2909 and other members of this antibody class. The 2909 structure was dominated by a heavy-chain third-complementarity-determining region (CDR H3) of 21 residues, which comprised 36% of the combining surface and formed a β-hairpin club extending ∼20 Å beyond the rest of the antibody. Sequence analysis and mass spectrometry identified sites of tyrosine sulfation at the middle and top of CDR H3; substitutions with phenylalanine either ablated (middle substitution) or substantially diminished (top substitution) neutralization. Chimeric antibodies composed of heavy and light chains, exchanged between 2909 and other members of the class, indicated a substantial lack of complementation. Comparison of 2909 to PG16 (which is tyrosine sulfated and the only other member of the class for which a structure has previously been reported) showed that both utilize protruding, anionic CDR H3s for recognition. Thus, despite some diversity, members of this class share structural and functional similarities, with conserved features of the CDR H3 subdomain likely reflecting prevalent solutions by the human immune system for recognition of a quaternary site of HIV-1 vulnerability.Identification of conserved regions accessible on the HIV-1 envelope and design of immunogens that elicit broadly neutralizing antibodies against these sites continue to be major challenges in the development of an effective HIV-1 vaccine. The HIV-1 viral spike—composed of three exterior gp120 subunits and three transmembrane gp41 subunits—is highly protected, but a limited number of these conserved regions exist on the spike, identified primarily by the broadly neutralizing antibodies that target them. One region is quaternary in nature and appropriately formed only on the assembled viral spike (gp120₃/gp41₃). This region is targeted by a recently discovered (14) and fast expanding class of monoclonal antibodies (36, 40) that recognize epitopes with quaternary structural constraints, which are composed of portions of two gp120-variable loops, V2 and V3 (reviewed in reference 49). These quaternary structure-specific (or quaternary-specific) antibodies (also called quaternary-neutralizing epitope or “QNE” antibodies) are found in the sera of selected HIV-1-infected individuals who have broadly neutralizing serum antibodies (41); individual members of the class, however, vary greatly in their breadth of neutralization.Initial evidence for the existence of quaternary-specific antibodies arose in simian/human immunodeficiency virus-infected rhesus macaques and HIV-1-infected chimpanzees (6, 9, 13). Characterization of polyclonal sera from these infected animals suggested the presence of antibodies targeting a conformational epitope involving the variable loop regions of the gp120 viral envelope.Antibody 2909 was the first human monoclonal antibody against HIV-1 to be characterized as being specific for an epitope dependent on the quaternary interaction of envelope glycoproteins (14). It was identified by direct screening for neutralization activity against a pseudovirus derived from strain SF162 of HIV-1. It recognizes a quaternary epitope on the surface of native virions and infected cells but does not bind soluble gp120/gp140 envelope proteins or cell surface-expressed gp120 monomers (14, 20). Competition analysis and virological assays indicate that the 2909 epitope includes portions of the V2 and V3 loops of gp120 (14, 16), with the V2-V3 elements originating either from within a gp120 monomer or between gp120 protomers in the trimer context. Mapping of 2909 recognition identifies a particular anomaly in its recognition (16); neutralization by 2909 depends on the presence of a rare lysine at position 160 in the V2 loop rather than the conserved N-linked site of glycosylation found at this position in most HIV-1 isolates (providing a residue-specific explanation for the neutralization specificity of 2909 for the SF162 virus, which contains this rare lysine).Other strain-specific monoclonal antibodies like 2909 have been isolated from rhesus macaques infected with a chimeric simian/human immunodeficiency virus that contained an SF162 isolate-derived viral spike (SHIV_SF162P4) (36). These rhesus monoclonal antibodies exhibit properties similar to those of 2909 in their potent neutralization of SF162 and their recognition of V2-V3 only in the context of the functional viral spike (e.g., on virus particles) (36). Details from epitope mapping indicate that these rhesus antibodies and human antibody 2909 recognize overlapping epitopes, with some differences in requirements for V2 N-linked glycosylation (36).The somatically related human monoclonal antibodies, PG9 and PG16, were also identified by a direct screen for neutralization (40). They target a quaternary-specific V2-V3 epitope, but unlike 2909, they neutralize an extraordinary 70 to 80% of circulating primary HIV-1 isolates and appear to have some reactivity for monomeric gp120 (40). Much of their increased breadth of neutralization arises from their ability to recognize an N-linked glycan at position 160 in the V2 loop, a motif which is found in greater than 90% of HIV-1 group M isolates (25).Despite substantial differences in their neutralization breadth, antibodies 2909 and PG9/PG16 may be closely related. Notably, an N160K mutation in the V2 loop of typical primary HIV-1 isolates like YU2 and JR-FL can recover 2909 activity (16). Conversely, isolate SF162 can be converted to a PG9- and PG16-sensitive pseudovirus by the K160N mutation (40). Thus, a single N or K at position 160 appears to control much of the neutralization difference between 2909 and PG16. Together the results suggest that 2909 and PG9/PG16 antibodies recognize distinct immunotypes of a similar quaternary epitope.To gain insight into how antibodies achieve recognition of this epitope, we determined the crystal structure of the antigen-binding fragment (Fab) of 2909 at a 3.3-Å resolution and compared this structure to the previously determined structure of PG16 (31, 33). Mutational analysis was used to confirm structural hot spots, and chimeric analysis of domain swaps between 2909 and other quaternary-specific antibodies was used to refine assessments of functional similarity. By identifying structural features—shared between 2909 and PG16 but otherwise highly uncommon in antibodies—the results provide insight into conserved solutions by human antibodies for recognition of an important vaccine target on HIV-1.     

Immunization with Wild-Type or CD4-Binding-Defective HIV-1 Env Trimers Reduces Viremia Equivalently following Heterologous Challenge with Simian-Human Immunodeficiency Virus

We recently reported that rhesus macaques inoculated with CD4-binding-competent and CD4-binding-defective soluble YU2-derived HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env) trimers in adjuvant generate comparable levels of Env-specific binding antibodies (Abs) and T cell responses. We also showed that Abs directed against the Env coreceptor binding site (CoRbs) were elicited only in animals immunized with CD4-binding-competent trimers and not in animals immunized with CD4-binding-defective trimers, indicating that a direct interaction between Env and CD4 occurs in vivo. To investigate both the overall consequences of in vivo Env-CD4 interactions and the elicitation of CoRbs-directed Abs for protection against heterologous simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) challenge, we exposed rhesus macaques immunized with CD4-binding-competent and CD4-binding-defective trimers to the CCR5-tropic SHIV-SF162P4 challenge virus. Compared to unvaccinated controls, all vaccinated animals displayed improved control of plasma viremia, independent of the presence or absence of CoRbs-directed Abs prior to challenge. Immunization resulted in plasma responses that neutralized the heterologous SHIV challenge stock in vitro, with similar neutralizing Ab titers elicited by the CD4-binding-competent and CD4-binding-defective trimers. The neutralizing responses against both the SHIV-SF162P4 stock and a recombinant virus pseudotyped with a cloned SHIV-SF162P4-derived Env were significantly boosted by the SHIV challenge. Collectively, these results suggest that the capacity of soluble Env trimers to interact with primate CD4 in vivo and to stimulate the production of moderate titers of CoRbs-directed Abs did not influence the magnitude of the neutralizing Ab recall response after viral challenge or the subsequent control of viremia in this heterologous SHIV challenge model.The external glycoprotein gp120 and the membrane-anchored glycoprotein gp41 of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), collectively referred to as the envelope glycoproteins (Env), mediate viral entry and are the sole virally encoded targets for neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). Prior to binding the primary host cell receptor, CD4, the trimeric Env spike may sample multiple conformations on the surface of the virus. Which of these potential conformations display neutralizing Ab epitopes and are recognized by broadly reactive NAbs is currently unclear. A substantial conformational change occurs when the functional Env spike interacts with CD4, leading to the exposure and the formation of the bridging sheet, a highly conserved and immunogenic structure spanning the inner and outer domains of gp120 that contributes to coreceptor interaction (6, 14, 25, 30). CD4 binding is also thought to lead to the displacement of variable region 3 (V3) from a less exposed conformation in the packed functional spike to a more protruding conformation. Exposure of V3 is necessary for viral entry, as it also contributes to Env interaction with coreceptor (21). Additional or concurrent rearrangements of the functional spike structure may occur upon CD4 binding, as suggested by cryotomography (38), However, these rearrangements are less well understood due to the absence of a high-resolution structure of the static or CD4-liganded trimeric spike.In attempts to elicit broadly reactive NAbs against HIV-1 through vaccination, a range of recombinant Env variants were designed and tested (reviewed in references 15, 26, 49, and 50). The capacity of such immunogens to elicit broadly reactive NAbs is often determined using standardized in vitro neutralization assays (34). However, the ability of HIV-1 Env vaccine-elicited B cell responses to mediate actual protective and functional responses against in vivo virus challenge is evaluated less frequently, since this requires the use of nonhuman primates (NHPs) and infection with chimeric simian-human immunodeficiency viruses (SHIVs). A series of SHIVs was developed, including those based on the HIV-1 Env glycoproteins from SF162 (40), 89.6 (54), ADA (45), BaL (48), DH12 (59), and 1157i (27). So far, few of these models, if any, fully mimic HIV-1 infection in humans. Currently, serially passaged CCR5-using SHIV-SF162 (SHIV-SF162P), which establishes transient or more prolonged viremia in macaques, represent a frequently used model to evaluate the protective effect of Env-based immunogens (2-5, 19, 20, 23, 24, 29, 53, 67). Depending on the number and nature of passages that this virus has been exposed to, the SHIV-SF162P stocks are more or less neutralization resistant (19, 62), allowing one to test the efficacy of a given vaccine candidate against a more or less rigorous form of viral challenge. Protection against mucosal SHIV-SF162P4 challenge after homologous SF162ΔV2 Env protein immunization of rhesus macaques was recently reported (2, 3). However, the nature and specificities of the vaccine-induced immune responses that mediate this effect remain incompletely defined.We recently showed that Abs against the HIV-1 gp120 coreceptor binding site (CoRbs) are elicited as a consequence of in vivo interactions between Env and primate CD4 during immunization with soluble CD4 (sCD4)-binding-competent Env trimers (14). We subsequently showed that rhesus macaques inoculated with CD4-binding competent and CD4-binding defective soluble YU2-derived gp140-F trimers in adjuvant generate comparable levels of Env-specific binding Abs and T cell responses but that CoRbs-directed Abs are elicited only in animals immunized with wild-type (wt) CD4-binding competent Env trimers (13). So far, the impact of Env-CD4 in vivo interactions during Env immunization and the role of CoRbs-directed Abs in protection against SHIV infection remain incompletely understood. A majority of the well-characterized CoRbs-directed monoclonal Abs (MAbs) lack the capacity to neutralize primary viruses in vitro (7, 31). However, it has been suggested that Abs directed against this region may contribute to the neutralizing Ab response seen in some HIV-1-infected individuals (18, 35, 58) and to the protection observed in some SHIV challenge experiments (12).The distinct difference in the capacity of the CD4-binding competent and CD4-binding defective Env trimers to elicit CoRbs-directed Abs described in our previous study presented an opportunity to evaluate the protective effect of CoRbs-directed Abs in the SHIV model. The availability of animals immunized with these Env immunogens also allowed us to ask the more general question about whether in vivo interactions between soluble Env trimers and CD4-expressing host cells would influence the outcome of heterologous SHIV-SF162P4 infection. We show here that Env trimer-immunized animals displayed improved control of SHIV-SF162P4 viremia compared to unimmunized control animals, independent of whether they were inoculated with CD4-binding-competent or CD4-binding-defective trimers. These results suggest that the capacity of soluble Env trimers to interact with CD4 in vivo and to stimulate the production of CoRbs-directed Abs did not measurably influence the protective effect of the vaccine-elicited immune responses in this SHIV challenge model.     

Alterations in the Immunogenic Properties of Soluble Trimeric Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Envelope Proteins Induced by Deletion or Heterologous Substitutions of the V1 Loop

HIV-1 gp140 envelope immunogens express conserved epitopes that are targeted by broadly cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies, but they fail to elicit similar antibodies upon immunization. The poor immunogenicity of conserved epitopes on gp140 could be linked to the high immunogenicity of variable Env regions on such constructs. Previous studies have shown that the first hypervariable region (V1 loop) is immunogenic on soluble gp140s but elicits type-specific antibodies. To address issues related to the high immunogenicity of the V1 loop, two conceptually opposite approaches were tested. In the first approach, we eliminated the V1 loop from our gp140 construct and examined how V1 deletion altered the immunogenic properties of other Env regions. In the second approach, we took advantage of the high immunogenicity of the V1 loop and engrafted four diverse V1 loops onto a common gp140 Env “scaffold.” These four scaffolds were used as a cocktail of immunogens to elicit diverse anti-V1 antibodies, under the hypothesis that eliciting diverse anti-V1 antibodies would expand the neutralizing breadth of immune sera. Our study indicates that three of four heterologous V1 loops were immunogenic on the common Env backbone “scaffold,” but heterologous anti-V1 neutralizing responses were observed in only one case. Both types of V1 modification dampened the immunogenicity of the V3 loop, differentially altered the immunogenicity of the transmembrane gp41 subunit, and altered the relative immunogenicities of unknown Env regions, including potentially the CD4-binding site (CD4-bs) and trimer-specific targets, which elicited cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies but of limited breadth.An effective vaccine against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) will need to incorporate an envelope-derived immunogen capable of eliciting potent and broadly cross-reactive neutralizing antibody responses against diverse primary HIV-1 isolates. The target of anti-HIV neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), the viral envelope (Env) glycoprotein, is expressed as a single transmembrane polypeptide precursor (gp160) that is glycosylated and cleaved into an extracellular subunit (gp120) and a transmembrane subunit (gp41) during intracellular processing (10, 20, 21, 54). The functional Env form on virion surfaces is a trimer composed of three noncovalently associated gp120-gp41 heterodimers. Soluble forms of the trimeric Env have been generated by introducing stop codons immediately upstream of the transmembrane domain of gp41. These constructs are commonly referred to as gp140 proteins and have been tested extensively as immunogens to elicit anti-HIV-1 NAbs. Soluble gp140s express epitopes that are targets of NAbs, including cross-reactive NAbs such as b12, 4E10, and 2G12 (5, 17, 34, 45, 47, 49, 50, 52, 57). Immunization with gp140 immunogens nonetheless does not result in a broadly cross-reactive neutralizing antibody response (2, 3, 17, 18, 26, 56, 58).Epitope mapping analyses of the Abs elicited by soluble trimeric gp140 immunogens revealed that a large fraction of the gp140-induced neutralization response targets the first hypervariable region of gp120 (the V1 loop). In our hands, ∼40 to 70% of the neutralizing activity of sera from animals immunized with SF162 gp140 constructs is due to anti-V1 antibodies (17). In a study by Li et al. with YU2 gp140 (30) and a study by Wu et al. with HxB2/BaL gp145 (56), ∼10 to 80% of anti-YU2 neutralizing activity and 100% of anti-HxB2 neutralizing activity, respectively, were due to anti-V1 Abs. These anti-V1 Abs, however, are not cross-reactive. Previously, we also demonstrated that the diverse positionings of the V1 across heterologous strains limit access of broadly cross-reactive monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to their targets (12).Here, taking into consideration the V1 loop''s high immunogenicity, we employed two opposing approaches aimed at the elicitation of cross-reactive neutralizing antibody responses to HIV-1. In the first approach, we deleted the V1 loop on our soluble trimeric gp140 construct (ΔV1SF162 gp140) and examined whether and how this modification altered the immunogenic properties of other Env regions. In the second approach, we substituted the V1 loop on our SF162 gp140 construct with the V1 loops from four heterologous HIV-1 viruses (89.6, YU2, JRFL, and HxB2) that differ in their amino acid compositions and in the number of potential N-linked glycosylation sites (PNGs). These four heterologous viruses display various neutralization phenotypes (7) and coreceptor utilization profiles (15, 35, 36, 48, 51). A total of four SF162 Env-based gp140 “scaffolds” expressing four different V1 loops were created and used as immunogens in a cocktail to test as a “proof of principle” the hypothesis that if diverse V1 loops are presented to the immune system simultaneously, the elicitation of anti-V1 NAbs with diverse specificities would broaden the overall neutralizing activity of immune sera. We also immunized animals with each of the four V1 chimeric scaffolds individually to ensure that all V1 loops were immunogenic when presented on the heterologous SF162 Env background.All immunogens (including wild-type [WT] SF162 gp140 and ΔV1SF162 gp140) elicited homologous anti-SF162 NAbs. All immunogens except the scaffold construct expressing the YU2 V1 also elicited heterologous NAbs against the sensitive lab-adapted strain HxB2. The heterologous YU2, 89.6, and HxB2 V1 loops, but not the JRFL V1 loop, were immunogenic on the background of the SF162 Env scaffold. However, only anti-V1 neutralizing activity against the HxB2 virus was observed. Although neither approach resulted in the development of broad anti-HIV-1 cross-neutralizing antibody responses, cross-neutralizing antibody responses of narrow breadth were elicited. These responses were not due to antibodies that target to variable regions of gp120 but were due to antibodies that target either epitopes of the CD4-binding site (CD4-bs) or epitopes that are not present on monomeric gp120. These observations have implications for guiding rational Env-based immunogen design and for potentially eliciting broadly cross-reactive NAb responses.     

Antibody-Mediated Protection against Mucosal Simian-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Challenge of Macaques Immunized with Alphavirus Replicon Particles and Boosted with Trimeric Envelope Glycoprotein in MF59 Adjuvant

We have previously shown that rhesus macaques were partially protected against high-dose intravenous challenge with simian-human immunodeficiency virus SHIV_SF162P4 following sequential immunization with alphavirus replicon particles (VRP) of a chimeric recombinant VEE/SIN alphavirus (derived from Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus [VEE] and the Sindbis virus [SIN]) encoding human immunodeficiency virus type 1 HIV-1_SF162 gp140ΔV2 envelope (Env) and trimeric Env protein in MF59 adjuvant (R. Xu, I. K. Srivastava, C. E. Greer, I. Zarkikh, Z. Kraft, L. Kuller, J. M. Polo, S. W. Barnett, and L. Stamatatos, AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 22:1022-1030, 2006). The protection did not require T-cell immune responses directed toward simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) Gag. We extend those findings here to demonstrate antibody-mediated protection against mucosal challenge in macaques using prime-boost regimens incorporating both intramuscular and mucosal routes of delivery. The macaques in the vaccination groups were primed with VRP and then boosted with Env protein in MF59 adjuvant, or they were given VRP intramuscular immunizations alone and then challenged with SHIV_SF162P4 (intrarectal challenge). The results demonstrated that these vaccines were able to effectively protect the macaques to different degrees against subsequent mucosal SHIV challenge, but most noteworthy, all macaques that received the intramuscular VRP prime plus Env protein boost were completely protected. A statistically significant association was observed between the titer of virus neutralizing and binding antibodies as well as the avidity of anti-Env antibodies measured prechallenge and protection from infection. These results highlight the merit of the alphavirus replicon vector prime plus Env protein boost vaccine approach for the induction of protective antibody responses and are of particular relevance to advancing our understanding of the potential correlates of immune protection against HIV infection at a relevant mucosal portal of entry.After more than 25 years of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) research, a prophylactic vaccine able to control or prevent the worldwide spread of HIV/AIDS remains an elusive goal. Recent results in Thailand with the recombinant canary pox (ALVAC-HIV, vCP1521; Sanofi-Pasteur) prime-gp120 (AIDSVAX B/E) protein boost vaccine approach give us hope that such a vaccine is achievable (45). Nevertheless, the results from this trial as well as the disappointing outcome of the Step Study trial (7, 29, 46) vividly highlight the need to better understand the immune correlates of protection and the immune responses engendered by the diverse new vaccine technologies currently under evaluation (13, 18, 20, 49). In the case of viral vectors, this is particularly critical, as the spectrum of immune responses elicited in animal models does not necessarily predict those eventually observed in human clinical trials and will require more thorough evaluations in order to identify the most predictive models. At the moment, nonhuman primate models, such as simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) and simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) infection of macaques appear to be the most informative for guiding vaccine development (3, 24, 47, 55), and more rigorous application of these models has begun to yield new and encouraging insights into protective immunity (5, 19, 27, 56). Moreover, as most HIV transmissions occur through mucosal membranes, understanding the correlates of protection, following successful vaccinations, against mucosal challenge is of strong interest.Alphaviruses are positive-sense single-stranded 11.5-kb RNA viruses in the Togaviridae family. They are relatively simple enveloped viruses of approximately 60-nm diameter that have a cytoplasmic RNA-based life cycle and mature at the plasma membranes of infected cells. Recombinant alphavirus replicon particles used for vaccine applications are composed of a replicon vector that encodes the viral replicases (nonstructural proteins [NSPs]) and the vaccine antigen of interest and two packaging vectors that encode the major viral structural proteins (capsid and glycoproteins E1 and E2) required for particle formation. The chimeric (VEE/SIN) alphavirus vector system used in this study was derived from Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEE) and the Sindbis virus (SIN). The recombinant VEE, SIN, and Semliki viruses expressing SIV or HIV antigens as well as antigens from a diverse and growing list of pathogens have been evaluated extensively in animals by several groups (6, 15, 16, 17, 22, 32, 34, 35, 36, 38, 42, 44, 57, 58). The chimeric alphavirus replicon particles (VRP) used here were designed to combine the immune potency of the VEE replicon with the safety profile of the SIN structural proteins (38).In previous studies, we showed that rhesus macaques could be protected against high-dose intravenous challenges with SHIV_SF162P4 following sequential immunization with chimeric recombinant VRP encoding human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) SF162 gp140ΔV2 envelope (Env) and trimeric SF162 gp140ΔV2 Env in the MF59 adjuvant (57). We also showed the Env protein delivered with potent adjuvants (the LTK63 mucosal adjuvant and the MF59 adjuvant) using intramuscular (i.m.) or combined mucosal (intranasal [i.n.]) plus i.m. vaccine regimens provided complete protection against intravaginal (IVAG) challenge with SHIV_SF162P4 (2)_. The current work extends these studies by investigating the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of recombinant VRP delivered either mucosally, by the i.n. or intrarectal (i.r.) route, or parenterally by the i.m. route as a vector system for priming humoral immune responses prior to mucosal i.r. SHIV_SF162P4 challenge in the rhesus macaque model.In these studies, the alphavirus vector priming immunizations are followed by sequential booster immunizations with a highly purified and well-characterized trimeric V2-deleted envelope glycoprotein delivered in MF59, an oil-in-water emulsion, as an adjuvant. The HIV-1 Env antigen used in both the recombinant alphavirus prime and protein boost was derived from the macrophage-tropic chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 5 (CCR5)-utilizing HIV-1_SF162 strain, which closely matches the envelope of the SHIV_SF162P4 used for the i.r. challenge. This vaccine challenge study design thus serves as a useful starting point to better understand the mechanisms of immune protection against a relevant challenge virus and also the route of challenge in an active immunization model. Despite accelerated efforts in our laboratory and many others to identify the next generation of Env immunogens, evaluations of the breadth of protection are reserved for ongoing and future studies.     

Introduction of Exogenous Epitopes in the Variable Regions of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Envelope Glycoprotein: Effect on Viral Infectivity and the Neutralization Phenotype

In this study we examined whether human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is equally susceptible to neutralization by a given antibody when the epitope of this antibody is introduced at different positions within the viral envelope glycoprotein (Env). To this end, we introduced two exogenous “epitope tags” at different locations within three major Env regions in two distinct HIV-1 isolates. We examined how the introduction of the exogenous epitopes affects Env expression, Env incorporation into virions, Env fusogenic potential, and viral susceptibility to neutralization. Our data indicate that even within the same Env region, the exact positioning of the epitope impacts the susceptibility of the virus to neutralization by the antibody that binds to that epitope. Our data also indicate that even if the same epitope is introduced in the exact same position on two different Envs, its exposure and, as a result, the neutralization susceptibility of the virus, can be very different. In contrast to the findings of previous studies conducted with HIV-1 isolates other than those used here, but in agreement with results obtained with simian immunodeficiency virus, we observed that tagging of the fourth variable region of Env (V4) did not result in neutralization by the anti-tag antibodies. Our data indicate that epitopes in V4 are not properly exposed within the functional HIV-1 trimeric Env spike, suggesting that V4 may not be a good target for vaccine-elicited neutralizing antibodies.The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope glycoprotein (Env) is expressed as a heavily glycosylated peptide of approximately 160 kDa (gp160), which is cleaved intracellularly into two noncovalently associated subunits: an extracellular subunit (gp120), responsible for CD4 and coreceptor (primarily CCR5 and/or CXCR4) binding, and a transmembrane subunit (gp41) that mediates fusion between viral and host cell membranes. Based on amino acid sequence homology analysis of gp120s derived from diverse HIV-1 isolates, gp120 is divided into five “constant” regions (C1 to C5) and five “variable” regions (also called “loops,” because most of them have cysteines in the N and C termini that form disulfide bonds). Despite their extensive amino acid variability, the variable loops of gp120 play central roles during the entry of the virus into the cell, for instance, by directly or indirectly modulating the interaction of Env with coreceptor molecules on the target surfaces during virus-cell fusion. They also offer protection from neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) by various mechanisms. The variable loops themselves are targets of NAbs, and during infection, the replicating virus accumulates mutations in the variable regions that allow it to escape the action of anti-variable loop-directed NAbs, while at the same time the variable loops are positioned within the Env trimer so that they prevent, or minimize, the binding of NAbs to more-conserved epitopes, such as the receptor and coreceptor binding sites (4, 5, 12, 15, 20, 23, 25, 27, 31).HIV-1 strains display distinct neutralization phenotypes. Some isolates, such as SF162, are generally susceptible to NAbs that bind to many distinct regions of Env, including the variable regions, while other isolates, such as YU2 or JRFL, are generally resistant to neutralization by the same NAbs (1). It has been proposed that irrespective of the overall neutralizing phenotype of HIV-1 isolates, the binding of only a single antibody per Env trimer on the virion surface can lead to neutralization, when all Env trimers present on the virion surface are bound by at least one antibody (32). This important observation also implies that the epitope specificity of an antibody may not be as important for neutralization as its ability to bind to its target within the trimeric Env structure. In fact, antibodies to diverse regions of Env, such as V1, V2, V3, and the receptor and coreceptor binding sites, can all neutralize HIV-1 (1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 18, 20, 23, 25, 27, 29, 30).In many cases, a given isolate will not be equally susceptible to neutralization by NAbs that bind to different Env regions, for example, the V3 loop and the CD4-binding site (CD4-BS). Whether differences in the neutralizing potentials of two antibodies that bind to distinct epitopes on HIV-1 Env are due to differences in the binding affinities of the two antibodies or whether they occur because the viruses are intrinsically more susceptible to NAbs that bind certain epitopes and not others (i.e., the relative importance of the various regions of Env in Env function and virus neutralization sensitivity differs) is not yet fully understood. One way to address these issues is to introduce small non-HIV Env amino acid sequences (tags) that are targets of known monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) at various positions within the viral Env and to examine how the placement of the same epitope at different positions within Env affects the neutralization phenotype of the virus.Foreign epitopes have been introduced into the variable regions of HIV and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) Envs, and their effects on viral neutralization potential have been examined (14, 19, 22, 33). Yang and colleagues (33) introduced the FLAG epitope into the V4 regions of three HIV-1 isolates (YU2, JRFL, and HxB2) displaying distinct neutralization phenotypes in response to anti-HIV NAbs; they found that all three pseudotyped viruses were equivalently neutralized by an anti-FLAG MAb. One important implication of that study is that neutralization-resistant isolates, such as YU2 or JRFL, are not intrinsically more resistant to neutralization than more-susceptible isolates, such as HxB2, so long as the antibody binds to its epitope on the functional virion-associated Env spike. A second implication is that since the FLAG epitope was exposed in the V4 loops of all three isolates, the V4 loop could theoretically be a good target for vaccine-elicited antibodies. In contrast, Pantophlet et al. (19) introduced the HA tag into various regions of the JRCSF (neutralization-resistant) and HxB2 (neutralization-sensitive) isolates and reported that JRCSF was intrinsically more resistant than HxB2 to anti-HA antibodies. This observation implies, therefore, that some HIV-1 strains (primary, neutralization-resistant strains) have developed mechanisms that limit the accessibility of multiple Env regions, including variable regions, to antibodies developed during infection. Laird and Desrosiers (14) introduced the FLAG epitope into two positions within each of the V1, V2, and V4 loops of SIV239 and SIV316. They reported that the functionality of Env was differentially affected by the precise location of the exogenous tag sequence within the variable loops examined. Importantly, and in contrast to what was reported for the HIV-1 isolates mentioned above, the SIV239 variants containing a V4 FLAG epitope were not neutralized by an anti-FLAG MAb. It appeared, however, that the FLAG epitope was not well exposed on the trimeric Env when introduced into the V4 loop of SIV but was exposed when introduced into the V1 loop of the same virus. Potentially, this means that the V4 loop is differentially exposed in the context of the HIV-1 and SIV Envs.The FLAG epitope (DYKDDDDK) is highly charged. Therefore, it is possible that the effect on Env function and epitope exposure could differ if a different exogenous epitope were inserted instead of FLAG. Here we examined the effect of variable loop tagging on the Env functions and viral neutralization phenotypes of two primary HIV-1 clade B isolates, SF162 (CCR5 tropic) and SF33 (CXCR4 tropic), using two exogenous epitopes (FLAG and hemagglutinin [HA] tags) positioned at multiple locations within the V1, V2, and V4 loops. By placing the same tag in several regions within each loop, we investigated the accessibilities of various parts of the same loop to a given NAb. By using two tags that differ significantly in amino acid composition (FLAG tag, DYKDDDDK; HA tag, YPYDVPDYA), we aimed at distinguishing between the effects of amino acid composition and the positioning of the tag on Env function and overall epitope exposure. Finally, identical evaluations of R5 and X4 Envs may provide information about the relative roles played in neutralization by variable loops in Envs displaying distinct coreceptor usage. We report that both the amino acid sequence and the position of the tag within and among the variable loops greatly affected the functionality of Env. In contrast to previous observations made with other HIV-1 Envs (33) but in agreement with what was reported for the SIV239 Env (14), we observed that tagging of the V4 loops of SF162 and SF33 did not render these isolates susceptible to neutralization by the corresponding anti-tag MAbs.     

Matrix and Envelope Coevolution Revealed in a Patient Monitored since Primary Infection with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1

Lentiviruses, including human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), typically encode envelope glycoproteins (Env) with long cytoplasmic tails (CTs). The strong conservation of CT length in primary isolates of HIV-1 suggests that this factor plays a key role in viral replication and persistence in infected patients. However, we report here the emergence and dominance of a primary HIV-1 variant carrying a natural 20-amino-acid truncation of the CT in vivo. We demonstrated that this truncation was deleterious for viral replication in cell culture. We then identified a compensatory amino acid substitution in the matrix protein that reversed the negative effects of CT truncation. The loss or rescue of infectivity depended on the level of Env incorporation into virus particles. Interestingly, we found that a virus mutant with defective Env incorporation was able to spread by cell-to-cell transfer. The effects on viral infectivity of compensation between the CT and the matrix protein have been suggested by in vitro studies based on T-cell laboratory-adapted virus mutants, but we provide here the first demonstration of the natural occurrence of similar mechanisms in an infected patient. Our findings provide insight into the potential of HIV-1 to evolve in vivo and its ability to overcome major structural alterations.The envelope glycoprotein complex of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is involved principally in virion attachment to target cell surfaces and in the entry process (15, 18, 27, 29, 52). Envelope glycoproteins (Env) are initially translated as a gp160 precursor glycoprotein, which is then processed during its trafficking through the secretory pathway, to yield a surface subunit gp120 noncovalently attached to a transmembrane subunit gp41. During HIV-1 assembly, Env proteins are incorporated at the surface of the viral particle as a trimeric structure consisting of three gp120/gp41 dimers (59, 62).The gp41 consists of an ectodomain, a hydrophobic transmembrane anchor, and a cytoplasmic tail (CT). Lentiviruses, including HIV-1 and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), are unusual in having a transmembrane subunit with much longer CTs (∼150 amino acids) than most other retroviruses (20 to 50 amino acids) (27). Early studies with T-cell laboratory-adapted HIV-1 mutants showed that the gp41 CT region played an important role in regulating Env functions, the incorporation of Env into virus particles and, consequently, viral replication (16, 21, 35, 63). The integrity of the gp41 CT thus appears to be crucial for replication in primary T cells, macrophages, and in many transformed T-cell lines (1, 44). Viral variants with truncated gp41 are rarely isolated from infected patients. One study reported the isolation of a CD4-independent variant harboring a sharply truncated CT (64). However, this atypical isolate existed as a minority variant in the original quasispecies of the patient (54). SIV variants with truncated CTs obtained in cell culture in vitro have also been shown to revert rapidly (to full-length CT) when introduced into macaques (39). These observations indicate that the long CTs of lentiviruses, such as HIV-1 and SIV, have functions specific to viral replication and persistence in vivo.Two groups of conserved sequence motifs have been identified in the gp41 CT that are likely to be involved in its functions. The first group, involved in regulating the intracellular trafficking of Env, includes a membrane-proximal tyrosine-based endocytic motif, Y₇₁₂SPL, (9, 47); a diaromatic motif, Y₈₀₂W₈₀₃, implicated in the retrograde transport of Env to the trans-Golgi network (8), and a C-terminal dileucine motif recently identified as a second endocytic motif (7, 10, 60). We have also provided evidence for the existence of additional as-yet-unidentified signals in studies of primary HIV-1 (34). The second group of motifs consists of three structurally conserved amphipathic α-helical domains: lentivirus lytic peptides 1, 2, and 3 (LLP-1, LLP-2, and LLP-3) (11, 17, 33). LLP domains have been implicated in various functions, including Env fusogenicity and the incorporation of Env into HIV-1 particles (28, 32, 43, 45, 50, 61).Several lines of evidence suggest that Env incorporation requires direct or indirect interactions between the matrix domain of the structural protein precursor Pr55^Gag (matrix) and the gp41 CT during HIV-1 assembly. This possibility was first suggested by the observation that HIV-1 Env drives the basolateral budding of Gag in polarized cells (37, 48). A direct interaction between the matrix and a glutathione S-transferase fusion protein containing Env CT was subsequently observed in vitro (13). Synthetic peptides corresponding to various domains of the gp41 CT have also been shown to interact directly with Pr55^Gag molecules (26). Furthermore, effects on viral infectivity of compensation between the CT and the matrix protein have been suggested by studies based on T-cell laboratory-adapted virus mutants (19, 40, 43). Finally, the cellular protein TIP47 was recently implicated in Env incorporation, based on its ability to bind both the matrix protein and the gp41 CT (38).In a previous study describing the evolutionary dynamics of the glycan shield of HIV-1 Env, we identified a patient (patient 153) for whom the 15 env clones obtained during primary infection (early stage) encoded full-length Env, whereas the 15 env sequences from the HIV-1 present 6 years later (late stage) encoded truncated gp41 CTs (14). These late-stage sequences contained a deletion introducing an in-frame stop codon, resulting in a 20-amino-acid truncation of the Env. Note that, unlike a point mutation, this deletion cannot easily revert to the full-length form. Such a deletion affecting various known motifs of the gp41 CT would be expected to impair viral replication. However, the plasma viral load measured in patient 153 demonstrated that the virus had retained its ability to replicate.In the present study, we explored the molecular mechanisms by which a primary HIV-1 maintained its capacity to replicate efficiently in this patient and demonstrated for the first time the occurrence of matrix and Env coevolution in vivo, providing insight into the ability of HIV-1 to overcome major structural alterations.     

Pseudotyping Incompatibility between HIV-1 and Gibbon Ape Leukemia Virus Env Is Modulated by Vpu

The Env protein from gibbon ape leukemia virus (GaLV) has been shown to be incompatible with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in the production of infectious pseudotyped particles. This incompatibility has been mapped to the C-terminal cytoplasmic tail of GaLV Env. Surprisingly, we found that the HIV-1 accessory protein Vpu modulates this incompatibility. The infectivity of HIV-1 pseudotyped with murine leukemia virus (MLV) Env was not affected by Vpu. However, the infectivity of HIV-1 pseudotyped with an MLV Env with the cytoplasmic tail from GaLV Env (MLV/GaLV Env) was restricted 50- to 100-fold by Vpu. A Vpu mutant containing a scrambled membrane-spanning domain, Vpu_RD, was still able to restrict MLV/GaLV Env, but mutation of the serine residues at positions 52 and 56 completely alleviated the restriction. Loss of infectivity appeared to be caused by reduced MLV/GaLV Env incorporation into viral particles. The mechanism of this downmodulation appears to be distinct from Vpu-mediated CD4 downmodulation because Vpu-expressing cells that failed to produce infectious HIV-1 particles nonetheless continued to display robust surface MLV/GaLV Env expression. In addition, if MLV and HIV-1 were simultaneously introduced into the same cells, only the HIV-1 particle infectivity was restricted by Vpu. Collectively, these data suggest that Vpu modulates the cellular distribution of MLV/GaLV Env, preventing its recruitment to HIV-1 budding sites.The gammaretrovirus gibbon ape leukemia virus (GaLV) has been widely used for gene therapy because of its wide host cell tropism and nonpathogenicity (1, 6, 10, 12, 13, 20). The host cell receptor for GaLV Env has been cloned and identified as a sodium-dependent phosphate transporter protein (25, 26). Like other retroviruses, GaLV encodes a single transmembrane surface glycoprotein (GaLV Env), which is cleaved into surface (SU) and transmembrane (TM) subunits (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). The TM domain of GaLV Env contains a short 30-amino-acid C-terminal cytoplasmic tail. Although GaLV Env functions well when coupled (pseudotyped) with murine leukemia virus (MLV)-based retroviral vectors, it has been shown to be completely incompatible with HIV-1 (4, 35). When GaLV Env is expressed with HIV-1, essentially no infectious HIV-1 particles are produced (4, 35). The mechanism for this infectivity downmodulation is unknown, but the component of GaLV Env responsible for the restriction has been mapped to the cytoplasmic tail. Replacing the cytoplasmic tail of GaLV Env with the equivalent sequence from MLV Env ameliorates the restriction. Likewise, replacing the cytoplasmic tail of MLV Env with that from GaLV Env confers the restriction (4).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Schematic of MLV Env protein. Sequences are the C-terminal cytoplasmic tails of MLV Env, GaLV Env, and human CD4. GaLV sequences in boldface are residues that have been shown to modulate the HIV-1 incompatibility (4). Underlined sequences in CD4 are amino acids required for Vpu-mediated downmodulation (2, 15). Arrows denote the location of MLV/GaLV tail substitution. SU, surface domain; TM, transmembrane domain.Vpu is an 81-amino-acid HIV-1 accessory protein produced from the same mRNA as the HIV-1 Env gene. The N terminus of Vpu contains a membrane-spanning domain, followed by a 50-amino-acid cytoplasmic domain. Vpu is unique to HIV-1 and a few closely related SIV strains. The best-characterized roles for Vpu in the HIV-1 life cycle are modulation of host proteins CD4 and tetherin (also known as BST-2, CD317, and HM1.24) (24, 38, 39). Vpu promotes the degradation of CD4 in the endoplasmic reticulum through a proteasome-dependent mechanism (29). The cytoplasmic tail of Vpu physically interacts with the cytoplasmic tail of CD4 and recruits the human β-transducing repeat-containing protein (β-TrCP) and E3 ubiquitin ligase components to polyubiquitinate and ultimately trigger the degradation of CD4 (18). Two serine residues at positions 52 and 56 of Vpu are phosphorylated by casein kinase-2 and are required for CD4 degradation (31, 32). The membrane-spanning domain of Vpu is not specifically required for CD4 degradation. A mutant protein containing a scrambled membrane-spanning sequence, Vpu_RD, is still able to trigger the degradation of CD4 (32). The region of CD4 that is targeted by Vpu is approximately 17 to 13 amino acids from the C terminus in the cytoplasmic tail (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) (2, 15).In addition to degrading CD4, Vpu has also long been known to result in enhanced viral release (EVR) in certain cell lines (14, 36). Recently, the type I interferon-induced host protein tetherin was identified as being responsible for this Vpu-modulated restriction (24, 38). In the absence of Vpu, tetherin causes particles to remain tethered (hence the name) to the host cell postfission. Although Vpu counteracts the function of tetherin, the exact mechanism has not been fully elucidated. However, the mechanism for tetherin antagonism appears to be distinct from that for modulating CD4. Mutation of the serines 52 and 56 of Vpu abolish CD4 degradation, but only reduce EVR activity (5, 17, 21, 32). Some EVR activity remains even when much of the Vpu cytoplasmic tail is deleted (30). In addition, many mutations in the membrane-spanning domain, such as Vpu_RD, do not affect CD4 degradation and yet completely abolish EVR activity (27, 30, 37). The critical residues in tetherin for recognition by Vpu appear to be in the membrane-spanning domain and not the cytoplasmic tail (9, 19, 28). Although β-TrCP is required for complete EVR activity, there is no consensus whether the degradation of tetherin is proteasome or lysosome mediated (5, 7, 21) or whether degradation is required at all. In some cases there can be some EVR activity in the absence of tetherin degradation (17, 22).We demonstrate here that Vpu is responsible for the incompatibility between HIV-1 and GaLV Env. Glycoproteins containing the cytoplasmic tail from GaLV Env are prevented from being incorporated into HIV-1 particles by Vpu, effectively reducing infectious particle production by 50- to 100-fold. The serines at positions 52 and 56 are required for this restriction, but the membrane-spanning domain is not. Although the mechanism for this restriction appears similar to CD4 degradation, there are apparent differences. Vpu does not prevent surface expression, and it does not prevent its incorporation into MLV particles. Therefore, the mechanism of restriction appears to involve a system that does not rely directly on global protein degradation.     

Different Tempo and Anatomic Location of Dual-Tropic and X4 Virus Emergence in a Model of R5 Simian-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection

We previously reported coreceptor switch in rhesus macaques inoculated intravenously with R5 simian-human immunodeficiency virus SF162P3N (SHIV_SF162P3N). Whether R5-to-X4 virus evolution occurs in mucosally infected animals and in which anatomic site the switch occurs, however, were not addressed. We herein report a change in coreceptor preference in macaques infected intrarectally with SHIV_SF162P3N. The switch occurred in infected animals with high levels of virus replication and undetectable antiviral antibody response and required sequence changes in the V3 loop of the gp120 envelope protein. X4 virus emergence was associated with an accelerated drop in peripheral CD4⁺ T-cell count but followed rather than preceded the onset of CD4⁺ T-cell loss. The conditions, genotypic requirements, and patterns of coreceptor switch in intrarectally infected animals were thus remarkably consistent with those found in macaques infected intravenously. They also overlapped with those reported for humans, suggestive of a common mechanism for coreceptor switch in the two hosts. Furthermore, two independent R5-to-X4 evolutionary pathways were identified in one infected animal, giving rise to dual-tropic and X4 viruses which differed in switch kinetics and tissue localization. The dual-tropic switch event predominated early, and the virus established infection in multiple tissues sites. In contrast, the switch to X4 virus occurred later, initiating and expanding mainly in peripheral lymph nodes. These findings help define R5 SHIV_SF162P3N infection of rhesus macaques as a model to study the mechanistic basis, dynamics, and sites of HIV-1 coreceptor switch.The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) enters target cells via binding of the viral envelope glycoprotein to the CD4 receptor, triggering envelope conformational changes that allow for interaction with either the CCR5 or CXCR4 chemokine receptor (1, 3, 8, 15, 16, 18). Most HIV type 1 (HIV-1) transmissions are initiated with CCR5-using (R5) viruses (58, 68). With time, CXCR4-tropic (X4) viruses emerge and coexist with R5 viruses in close to 50% of subtype B-infected individuals, and this is accompanied by a rise in viremia, rapid CD4⁺ T-cell loss, and progression to disease (4, 7, 11, 34, 57, 65). The mechanistic basis and reasons for HIV-1 coreceptor switch, however, are still not well understood. Several factors including high viral load, low CD4⁺ T-cell numbers, reduced availability of CCR5⁺ cells, and progressive immune dysfunction have been proposed as playing important roles (48, 54). Since X4 virus emergence is associated with a faster rate of disease progression, insights into the determinants of HIV-1 coreceptor switch are of interest in understanding viral pathogenesis. Furthermore, with the introduction of CCR5 entry inhibitors as anti-HIV therapeutics (19, 23, 24, 38), there is a need not only to identify the presence of X4 variants in patients when treatment options are considered but also to understand the factors that influence X4 virus evolution. Although the majority of individuals failing on short-term CCR5 antagonist monotherapy harbor preexisting minor X4 variants (71), it is conceivable that given the right conditions and selective forces, inhibiting HIV-1 entry via CCR5 may drive the virus to evolve to CXCR4 usage and exacerbate disease. An animal model that faithfully recapitulates the process of coreceptor switch will be highly useful to study and identify the determinants and conditions that facilitate the change in coreceptor preference. In addition, an animal model provides the opportunity to track the kinetics of coreceptor switching at different anatomical sites, which may inform on the mechanisms of X4 virus emergence.In this regard, we recently reported coreceptor switch in two of nine rhesus macaques (RM) inoculated intravenously with simian-human immunodeficiency virus SF162P3N (SHIV_SF162P3N) that bears an HIV-1 CCR5-tropic Env (28, 29). In order to establish a reproducible model for coreceptor switch, however, it was crucial to document additional switching events. Furthermore, since the majority of HIV transmission occurs via mucosal surfaces, it was important to demonstrate coreceptor switch in macaques infected with R5 SHIV_SF162P3N by the mucosal route to validate this animal model in studying the in vivo evolution of HIV-1 coreceptor usage. Additionally, the tissue compartment(s) where CXCR4-using viruses evolve and expand is not well characterized. A recent study indicates that the thymus may play an important role in the evolution and/or amplification of coreceptor variants in pediatric HIV infection (56). Since the thymus is the primary source of T lymphopoiesis during early life (45) and since CXCR4 is the predominant coreceptor expressed on thymocytes (33, 64), this organ would seem to provide the ideal milieu for X4 amplification in infants and children. Indeed, we previously showed that whereas X4 SHIV infection of newborn RM resulted in severe thymic involution, R5 SHIV infection induced only a minor disruption in thymic morphology (55), lending support to the idea that the thymus is a preferred site for X4 replication in pediatric HIV infections. Nevertheless, thymopoietic function declines with age (17, 42, 60), and naïve T cells that express high levels of CXCR4 are also enriched in peripheral lymph nodes (5, 27, 36, 66). Thus, the role of the thymus and other lymphoid tissues in HIV-1 coreceptor switch in older individuals remains to be determined. To address these issues, we inoculated adult RM intrarectally (i.r.) with R5 SHIV_SF162P3N and performed frequent longitudinal blood and tissue samplings. Our goal was to document changes in coreceptor preference in mucosally infected macaques, as well as to obtain a more detailed picture of the kinetics and site of X4 virus evolution and amplification in vivo.     

Virus Entry via the Alternative Coreceptors CCR3 and FPRL1 Differs by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding to CD4 and a chemokine receptor, most commonly CCR5. CXCR4 is a frequent alternative coreceptor (CoR) in subtype B and D HIV-1 infection, but the importance of many other alternative CoRs remains elusive. We have analyzed HIV-1 envelope (Env) proteins from 66 individuals infected with the major subtypes of HIV-1 to determine if virus entry into highly permissive NP-2 cell lines expressing most known alternative CoRs differed by HIV-1 subtype. We also performed linear regression analysis to determine if virus entry via the major CoR CCR5 correlated with use of any alternative CoR and if this correlation differed by subtype. Virus pseudotyped with subtype B Env showed robust entry via CCR3 that was highly correlated with CCR5 entry efficiency. By contrast, viruses pseudotyped with subtype A and C Env proteins were able to use the recently described alternative CoR FPRL1 more efficiently than CCR3, and use of FPRL1 was correlated with CCR5 entry. Subtype D Env was unable to use either CCR3 or FPRL1 efficiently, a unique pattern of alternative CoR use. These results suggest that each subtype of circulating HIV-1 may be subject to somewhat different selective pressures for Env-mediated entry into target cells and suggest that CCR3 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtype B while FPRL1 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtypes A and C. These data may provide insight into development of resistance to CCR5-targeted entry inhibitors and alternative entry pathways for each HIV-1 subtype.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding first to CD4 and then to a coreceptor (CoR), of which C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is the most common (6, 53). CXCR4 is an additional CoR for up to 50% of subtype B and D HIV-1 isolates at very late stages of disease (4, 7, 28, 35). Many other seven-membrane-spanning G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been identified as alternative CoRs when expressed on various target cell lines in vitro, including CCR1 (76, 79), CCR2b (24), CCR3 (3, 5, 17, 32, 60), CCR8 (18, 34, 38), GPR1 (27, 65), GPR15/BOB (22), CXCR5 (39), CXCR6/Bonzo/STRL33/TYMSTR (9, 22, 25, 45, 46), APJ (26), CMKLR1/ChemR23 (49, 62), FPLR1 (67, 68), RDC1 (66), and D6 (55). HIV-2 and simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac isolates more frequently show expanded use of these alternative CoRs than HIV-1 isolates (12, 30, 51, 74), and evidence that alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 mediate infection of primary target cells by HIV-1 isolates is sparse (18, 30, 53, 81). Genetic deficiency in CCR5 expression is highly protective against HIV-1 transmission (21, 36), establishing CCR5 as the primary CoR. The importance of alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 has remained elusive despite many studies (1, 30, 70, 81). Expansion of CoR use from CCR5 to include CXCR4 is frequently associated with the ability to use additional alternative CoRs for viral entry (8, 16, 20, 63, 79) in most but not all studies (29, 33, 40, 77, 78). This finding suggests that the sequence changes in HIV-1 env required for use of CXCR4 as an additional or alternative CoR (14, 15, 31, 37, 41, 57) are likely to increase the potential to use other alternative CoRs.We have used the highly permissive NP-2/CD4 human glioma cell line developed by Soda et al. (69) to classify virus entry via the alternative CoRs CCR1, CCR3, CCR8, GPR1, CXCR6, APJ, CMKLR1/ChemR23, FPRL1, and CXCR4. Full-length molecular clones of 66 env genes from most prevalent HIV-1 subtypes were used to generate infectious virus pseudotypes expressing a luciferase reporter construct (19, 57). Two types of analysis were performed: the level of virus entry mediated by each alternative CoR and linear regression of entry mediated by CCR5 versus all other alternative CoRs. We thus were able to identify patterns of alternative CoR use that were subtype specific and to determine if use of any alternative CoR was correlated or independent of CCR5-mediated entry. The results obtained have implications for the evolution of env function, and the analyses revealed important differences between subtype B Env function and all other HIV-1 subtypes.     

Neutralization Efficiency Is Greatly Enhanced by Bivalent Binding of an Antibody to Epitopes in the V4 Region and the Membrane-Proximal External Region within One Trimer of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Glycoproteins

Most antibodies are multivalent, with the potential to bind with high avidity. However, neutralizing antibodies commonly bind to virions monovalently. Bivalent binding of a monoclonal antibody (MAb) to a virion has been documented only in a single case. Thus, the role of high avidity in antibody-mediated neutralization of viruses has not been defined clearly. In this study, we demonstrated that when an artificial 2F5 epitope was inserted in the gp120 V4 region so that an HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env) trimer contains a natural 2F5 epitope in the gp41 membrane-proximal envelope region (MPER) and an artificially engineered 2F5 epitope in the gp120 V4 region, bivalent 2F5 IgG achieved greatly enhanced neutralization efficiency, with a 50% inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) decrease over a 2-log scale. In contrast, the monovalent 2F5 Fab fragment did not exhibit any appreciable change in neutralization efficiency in the same context. These results demonstrate that bivalent binding of 2F5 IgG to a single HIV-1 Env trimer results in dramatic enhancement of neutralization, probably through an increase in binding avidity. Furthermore, we demonstrated that bivalent binding of MAb 2F5 to the V4 region and MPER of an HIV-1 Env trimer can be achieved only in a specific configuration, providing an important insight into the structure of a native/infectious HIV-1 Env trimer. This specific binding configuration also establishes a useful standard that can be applied to evaluate the biological relevance of structural information on the HIV-1 Env trimer.Immunoglobulin molecules have multiple binding paratopes for antigens; for example, those for IgG1 are bivalent and those for IgM are dodecavalent. It is obvious that multivalent binding is required for the distinct mechanism of neutralization by cross-linking multiple virions to form virus aggregates (reviewed in references 7 and 67). Despite the potential of antibodies for multivalent binding, structural evidence indicates that neutralizing antibodies often bind to an individual virion in a monovalent fashion (19, 20, 27, 29, 50, 53; reviewed in references 12 and 22). Bivalent binding of an antibody to a virion has been documented with clear structural evidence in only one case, in which monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) 17-IA and 8F5 bind to virions of human rhinovirus 14 (HRV14) and HRV2 (19, 43). Even in this unique case, binding bivalency appears to contribute to the neutralization potency of 17-IA but not to that of 8F5 (19, 42, 43). Moreover, these MAbs bind to two hydrophobic canyon structures formed by viral proteins VP1 and VP2 and not to antigenic epitopes within individual viral capsid protomers; thus, this case may represent an exception to the common form of antibody/antigen interactions in which the antibodies bind to individual antigens. Therefore, it is not clear what role antibody-binding multivalency plays in antibody-mediated neutralization of viruses at the level of interaction between antibody molecules and individual virions.The binding affinity of an antibody to its target is defined by intrinsic affinity and avidity (reviewed in reference 16). Intrinsic affinity is the force of monovalent binding between an antibody paratope and an antigenic epitope, often measured by binding a Fab fragment to an antigen. Avidity is the additive or synergistic force of engaging multiple antibody paratope/antigen epitope pairs between one antibody and one antigen. In other words, avidity is a functional consequence of antibody-binding multivalency. The effect of avidity on affinity is readily demonstrated in biochemical reactions such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and surface plasmon resonance (SPR), in which high-density antigenic sites are available without distinct spatial restrictions. It is commonly assumed that both affinity and avidity have functional consequences in antibody-mediated neutralization of viruses (reviewed in references 7 and 67). At the level of individual virions, the contribution of antibody-binding avidity to neutralization efficiency is often based on two types of experiments. In one, results from a side-by-side comparison between an antibody and its Fab fragment are often reported as evidence supporting a role of antibody-binding multivalency in virus neutralization. However, the interpretation of this type of experiment is complicated by the size difference between an antibody and a Fab fragment, since steric hindrance is a major mechanism of neutralization (reviewed in references 6 and 23). In a second type of experiment, a correlation between neutralization efficiency and the ability of the antibody/virus complex to resist chemical stress without dissociation in the presence of a high concentration of salt in solution is interpreted to support a contributing effect from antibody-binding avidity to neutralization efficiency (2, 21, 36, 49, 51). Data from this type of experiment are limited mostly to measuring binding affinity that is below the affinity required for virus neutralization. Furthermore, these studies often do not distinguish between avidity effects caused by an antibody binding to two (or more) epitopes on one antigen or to multiple epitopes from different molecules on the virion. Therefore, like the situation with antibody-binding multivalency, it remains unclear whether binding avidity contributes to antibody-mediated neutralization of viruses at the level of individual virions.The envelope glycoproteins (Envs) of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) exist on the virion or cell surface as trimers of gp120 and gp41 heterodimers (13, 30, 62, 65). High-resolution structural information for a native HIV-1 Env trimer is critically important for understanding the function of HIV-1 Envs as well as for guiding the development of an effective immunogen to elicit broad and potent neutralizing antibody responses. X-ray crystal structures of the gp41 ectodomain fragments in the postfusion conformation have been resolved; however, a high-resolution structure of gp41 in the prefusion conformation is still unavailable and likely will be more informative for understanding the function of HIV-1 Env trimers (9, 47, 52). Two X-ray crystal structures of the gp120 core in both the CD4-liganded and unliganded conformations have been solved, but the biological meanings of these structures, especially how they are related to the native, functional Env trimer, are still being debated (10, 26). Several low-resolution structures of the Env trimers from HIV-1 or the closely related simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) have been determined using cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) tomography (4, 30, 62, 64, 65, 66). The predicted structures for the Env trimer are in general quite different between the two studies, and the difference is particularly dramatic around the gp41 membrane-proximal external region (MPER). A high-resolution structure of the native HIV-1 Env trimer is needed to resolve these differences. In the meantime, a distinctive standard needs to be developed for evaluating the biological relevance of structural information of an HIV-1 Env trimer.Our previous studies of the stoichiometry of antibody-mediated neutralization of HIV-1 Env indicated that MAbs b12, 2G12, and 2F5 neutralize by a stoichiometry designated T=1, i.e., one antibody binds to and neutralizes one HIV-1 Env trimer (57). Furthermore, when an artificial epitope (FLAG) was inserted in the V4 region of HIV-1 gp120, an epitope-specific anti-FLAG MAb achieved neutralization by the mechanism of steric hindrance (37, 61). Using the well-defined 2F5 neutralizing epitope as a model system (35, 39, 45), we constructed HIV-1 Env proteins carrying one 2F5 epitope in the gp120 V4 region and another 2F5 epitope in the gp41 MPER. Here, we investigated whether binding bivalency leads to enhancement in neutralization efficiency. By studying the detailed requirement for binding bivalency, we also probed the structure of the native, functional HIV-1 Env trimer, aiming to establish a standard that can be employed to evaluate the biological relevance of structural information on the HIV-1 Env trimer.     

Breadth of Neutralizing Antibodies Elicited by Stable,Homogeneous Clade A and Clade C HIV-1 gp140 Envelope Trimers in Guinea Pigs

The native envelope (Env) spike on the surface of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is trimeric, and thus trimeric Env vaccine immunogens are currently being explored in preclinical immunogenicity studies. Key challenges have included the production and purification of biochemically homogeneous and stable trimers and the evaluation of these immunogens utilizing standardized virus panels for neutralization assays. Here we report the binding and neutralizing antibody (NAb) responses elicited by clade A (92UG037.8) and clade C (CZA97.012) Env gp140 trimer immunogens in guinea pigs. These trimers have been selected and engineered for optimal biochemical stability and have defined antigenic properties. Purified gp140 trimers with Ribi adjuvant elicited potent, cross-clade NAb responses against tier 1 viruses as well as detectable but low-titer NAb responses against select tier 2 viruses from clades A, B, and C. In particular, the clade C trimer elicited NAbs that neutralized 27%, 20%, and 47% of tier 2 viruses from clades A, B, and C, respectively. Heterologous DNA prime, protein boost as well as DNA prime, recombinant adenovirus boost regimens expressing these antigens, however, did not result in an increased magnitude or breadth of NAb responses in this system. These data demonstrate the immunogenicity of stable, homogeneous clade A and clade C gp140 trimers and exemplify the utility of standardized tier 1 and tier 2 virus panels for assessing the NAb responses of candidate HIV-1 Env immunogens.The development and evaluation of novel HIV-1 Env immunogens are critical priorities of the HIV-1 vaccine field (2, 10, 25). The major antigenic target for neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) is the trimeric Env glycoprotein on the virion surface (4, 18, 30). Monomeric gp120 immunogens have not elicited broadly reactive NAbs in animal models (5, 13, 28, 29) or humans (16, 31), and thus several groups have focused on generating trimer immunogens that better mimic the native Env spike found on virions (3, 7, 14, 15, 20, 22, 27). It has, however, proven difficult to produce stable and conformationally homogeneous Env trimers. Strategies to modify Env immunogens have therefore been explored, including the removal of the cleavage site between gp120 and gp41 (3, 7, 23, 39, 40), the incorporation of an intramolecular disulfide bond to stabilize cleaved gp120 and gp41 moieties (6), and the addition of trimerization motifs such as the T4 bacteriophage fibritin “fold-on” (Fd) domain (8, 17, 39).Preclinical evaluation of candidate Env immunogens is critical for concept testing and for the prioritization of vaccine candidates. Luciferase-based virus neutralization assays with TZM.bl cells (21, 24) have been developed as high-throughput assays that can be standardized (26). However, the optimal use of this assay requires the generation of standardized virus panels derived from multiple clades that reflect both easy-to-neutralize (tier 1) and primary isolate (tier 2) viruses (21, 24). A tiered approach for the evaluation of novel Env immunogens has been proposed, in which tier 1 viruses represent homologous vaccine strains and a small number of heterologous neutralization-sensitive viruses while tier 2 viruses provide a greater measure of neutralization breadth for the purpose of comparing immunogens (24).We screened a large panel of primary HIV-1 isolates for Env stability and identified two viruses, CZA97.012 (clade C) (32) and 92UG037.8 (clade A) (17), that yielded biochemically homogeneous and stable Env trimers with well defined and uniform antigenic properties (17). The addition of the T4 bacteriophage fibritin “fold-on” (Fd) trimerization domain further increased their yield and purity (17). In the present study, we assessed the immunogenicity of these stable clade A and clade C gp140 trimers in guinea pigs. Both trimers elicited high-titer binding antibody responses and cross-clade neutralization of select tier 1 viruses as well as low-titer but detectable NAb responses against select tier 2 viruses from clades A, B, and C. These data demonstrate the immunogenicity of these stable gp140 trimers and highlight the utility of standardized virus panels in the evaluation of novel HIV-1 Env immunogens.     

Ebola Virus Glycoprotein Counteracts BST-2/Tetherin Restriction in a Sequence-Independent Manner That Does Not Require Tetherin Surface Removal

BST-2/tetherin is an interferon-inducible protein that restricts the release of enveloped viruses from the surface of infected cells by physically linking viral and cellular membranes. It is present at both the cell surface and in a perinuclear region, and viral anti-tetherin factors including HIV-1 Vpu and HIV-2 Env have been shown to decrease the cell surface population. To map the domains of human tetherin necessary for both virus restriction and sensitivity to viral anti-tetherin factors, we constructed a series of tetherin derivatives and assayed their activity. We found that the cytoplasmic tail (CT) and transmembrane (TM) domains of tetherin alone produced its characteristic cellular distribution, while the ectodomain of the protein, which includes a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor, was sufficient to restrict virus release when presented by the CT/TM regions of a different type II membrane protein. To counteract tetherin restriction and remove it from the cell surface, HIV-1 Vpu required the specific sequence present in the TM domain of human tetherin. In contrast, the HIV-2 Env required only the ectodomain of the protein and was sensitive to a point mutation in this region. Strikingly, the anti-tetherin factor, Ebola virus GP, was able to overcome restriction conferred by both tetherin and a series of functional tetherin derivatives, including a wholly artificial tetherin molecule. Moreover, GP overcame restriction without significantly removing tetherin from the cell surface. These findings suggest that Ebola virus GP uses a novel mechanism to circumvent tetherin restriction.Pathogenic viruses often have evolved mechanisms to neutralize host defenses that act at the cellular level to interfere with the virus life cycle. Such cellular restriction factors have been most extensively characterized for HIV-1 (38) and include the interferon-inducible membrane protein BST-2/HM1.24/CD317/tetherin (28, 40). If unchecked, tetherin blocks the release of newly formed HIV-1 particles from cells by physically tethering them at the cell surface (7, 28, 32, 40). In addition, tetherin has been shown to act against a broad range of enveloped viral particles, including retroviruses, filoviruses, arenaviruses, and herpesviruses (17, 18, 23, 35). In turn, certain viruses that are targeted by tetherin appear to have evolved counteracting activities, and anti-tetherin factors so far identified include HIV-1 Vpu; HIV-2 Env; simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) Nef, Vpu, and Env proteins; Ebola virus GP; and Kaposi''s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) K5 (11, 16, 18, 20, 23, 28, 36, 40, 44, 45).Tetherin is a homodimeric type II integral membrane protein containing an N-terminal cytoplasmic tail (CT), a single-pass transmembrane domain (TM), an ectodomain-containing predicted coiled-coil regions, two glycoslyation sites, three conserved cysteines, and a C-terminal glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor (2, 19, 31). This unusual topology, with two independent membrane anchors, has led to the suggestion that the retention of virions at the cell surface arises from tetherin''s ability to be inserted simultaneously in both host and viral membranes (28, 32, 41) or, alternatively, that dimers or higher-order complexes of tetherin conferred by the ectodomain mediate this effect (39). Interestingly, an artificial tetherin containing the same structural features as the native protein but constructed from unrelated sequences was able to restrict both HIV-1 and Ebola virus particles (32). This suggests that the viral lipid envelope is the target of tetherin and provides an explanation for tetherin''s broad activity against diverse enveloped viruses.A fraction of tetherin is present at the plasma membrane of cells (9, 14), and it has been proposed that viral anti-tetherin factors function by removing this cell surface fraction (40). This now has been shown to occur in the presence of HIV-1 Vpu (5, 7, 15, 26, 34, 40, 44), HIV-2 Env (5, 20), SIV Env (11), SIV Nef (15), and KSHV K5 (3, 23). In addition, certain anti-tetherin factors also may promote the degradation of tetherin, as has been observed for both HIV-1 Vpu (3, 5, 7, 10, 22, 26, 27) and KSHV K5 (3, 23), although Vpu also appears able to block tetherin restriction in the absence of degradation (8), and no effects on tetherin steady-state levels have been observed in the presence of either the HIV-2 or SIVtan Env (11, 20). Simply keeping tetherin away from the cell surface, or targeting it for degradation, may not be the only mechanism used by anti-tetherin factors, since it also has been reported that Vpu does not affect the levels of surface tetherin or its total cellular levels in certain T-cell lines (27).The interactions between tetherin and viral anti-tetherin factors show evidence of species specificity, suggesting ongoing evolution between viruses and their hosts. HIV-1 Vpu is active against human and chimpanzee tetherin but not other primate tetherins (10, 25, 34, 36, 44, 45), while SIV Nef proteins are active against primate but not human tetherins (16, 36, 44, 45). This suggests that, unlike tetherin restriction, the action of the anti-tetherin factors may involve specific sequence interactions. Indeed, the TM domain has been recognized as a target for HIV-1 Vpu (10, 15, 16, 25, 34), while a single point mutation introduced into the extracellular domain of human tetherin can block its antagonism by the SIVtan Env (11).In the present study, we investigated the roles of the different domains of tetherin in both promoting virus restriction and conferring susceptibility to the anti-tetherin factors encoded by HIV-1, HIV-2, and Ebola virus. We confirmed that tetherin restriction can be conferred by proteins that retain the two distinct membrane anchors, while signals for the cellular localization of the protein reside in the CT/TM domains of the protein. We found that the Vpu protein targets the TM domain of tetherin, while the HIV-2 Env targets the ectodomain of the protein. In contrast, the Ebola virus GP appears to use a non-sequence-specific mechanism to counteract tetherin restriction, since even an artificial tetherin could be successfully overcome by GP expression. Interestingly, Ebola virus GP counteracted tetherin restriction without removing the protein from the cell surface, suggesting that it is possible to overcome this restriction by mechanisms other than blocking tetherin''s cell surface expression.     

Antagonism to and Intracellular Sequestration of Human Tetherin by the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2 Envelope Glycoprotein

Tetherin (CD317/BST-2), an interferon-induced membrane protein, restricts the release of nascent retroviral particles from infected cell surfaces. While human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) encodes the accessory gene vpu to overcome the action of tetherin, the lineage of primate lentiviruses that gave rise to HIV-2 does not. It has been previously reported that the HIV-2 envelope glycoprotein has a Vpu-like function in promoting virus release. Here we demonstrate that the HIV-2 Rod envelope glycoprotein (HIV-2 Rod Env) is a tetherin antagonist. Expression of HIV-2 Rod Env, but not that of HIV-1 or the closely related simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) SIVmac1A11, counteracts tetherin-mediated restriction of Vpu-defective HIV-1 in a cell-type-specific manner. This correlates with the ability of the HIV-2 Rod Env to mediate cell surface downregulation of tetherin. Antagonism requires an endocytic motif conserved across HIV/SIV lineages in the gp41 cytoplasmic tail, but specificity for tetherin is governed by extracellular determinants in the mature Env protein. Coimmunoprecipitation studies suggest an interaction between HIV-2 Rod Env and tetherin, but unlike studies with Vpu, we found no evidence of tetherin degradation. In the presence of HIV-2 Rod Env, tetherin localization is restricted to the trans-Golgi network, suggesting Env-mediated effects on tetherin trafficking sequester it from virus assembly sites on the plasma membrane. Finally, we recapitulated these observations in HIV-2-infected CD4⁺ T-cell lines, demonstrating that tetherin antagonism and sequestration occur at physiological levels of Env expression during virus replication.Various stages of the replication cycle of primate lentiviruses can be targeted by host antiviral restriction factors (reviewed in reference 49). In addition to the well-characterized antiviral effects of members of the APOBEC3 family of cytidine deaminases, particularly APOBEC3G and -3F, and species-specific variants of tripartite motif family 5α, the release of nascent retroviral particles has recently been shown to be a target for a novel restriction factor, tetherin (CD317/bone marrow stromal cell antigen 2 [BST-2]) (31, 46). Tetherin is an interferon-inducible gene that was originally shown to impart a restriction on the release of mutants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) that lack a vpu gene (31, 46). In tetherin-positive cells, mature Vpu-defective HIV-1 particles are retained on the cell surface, linked to the plasma membrane (PM) and each other via protease-sensitive tethers, and can be subsequently endocytosed and accumulate in late endosomes (30, 31). Tetherin is not HIV specific and restricts the release of virus-like particles derived from all retroviruses tested (18), as well as those of filoviruses and arenaviruses (18, 19, 39).Tetherin is a small (181-amino-acid) type II membrane protein with an unusual topology that exists mainly as a disulfide-linked dimer (34). It consists of an N-terminal cytoplasmic tail, a transmembrane anchor, an extracellular domain that includes three cysteine residues important for dimerization, a putative coiled-coil, and finally a glycophosphatidyinosityl-linked lipid anchor (22) that is essential for restriction (31). Tetherin localizes to retroviral assembly sites on the PM (18, 31), and this unusual structure is highly suggestive that tetherin restricts virion release by incorporation into the viral membrane and cross-linking virions to cells. Such a mechanism would make tetherin a powerful antiviral effector that can target an obligate part of most, if not all, enveloped virus assembly strategies. Moreover, since tetherin restriction has no specific requirement for virus protein sequences, to avoid its action, mammalian viruses have evolved to encode several distinct countermeasures that specifically inhibit tetherin''s antiviral function.The Vpu accessory protein antagonizes tetherin-mediated restriction of HIV-1 (31, 46). In the presence of Vpu, tetherin is downregulated from the cell surface (2, 46) and is targeted for degradation (10, 13, 14), although whether these processes are required for antagonism of tetherin function is unclear (27). HIV-1 Vpu displays a distinct species specificity in that it is unable to target tetherin orthologues from rhesus macaques or African green monkeys (14, 25). This differential sensitivity maps to the tetherin transmembrane domain, particularly residues that are predicted to have been under high positive selection pressure during primate evolution (14, 16, 25). This suggests that tetherin evolution may have been driven in part by viral countermeasures like Vpu. Vpu, however, is only encoded by HIV-1 and its direct simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) lineage precursors. The majority of SIVs, including the SIVsm, the progenitor of both HIV-2 and SIVmac, do not encode a Vpu protein (21). In some of these SIVs, tetherin antagonism was recently shown to map to the nef gene (16, 51). SIV Nef proteins, however, are generally ineffective against human tetherin because they target a (G/D)DIWK motif that was deleted from the human tetherin cytoplasmic tail sometime after the divergence of humans and chimpanzees (51). This raises the question of how HIV-2 is able to overcome human tetherin, as recent data show chronically HIV-2-infected CEM T cells have reduced tetherin levels on their surface (10).Interestingly, it has long been known that the envelope glycoprotein of certain HIV-2 isolates can stimulate the release of Vpu-defective HIV-1 virions from cells we now know to be tetherin positive (5, 6, 43). HIV and SIV Envs form trimeric spikes of dimers of the surface subunit (SU-gp105 in HIV-2/SIVmac and gp120 in HIV-1) that bind CD4 and the chemokine coreceptor and gp41 (the transmembrane [TM] subunit that facilitates fusion with and entry into the target cell). Envelope precursors (gp140 or gp160) are synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum, where they become glycosylated and are exported to the surface via the secretory pathway (8). During transit through the Golgi apparatus and possibly in endosomal compartments, the immature precursors are cleaved by furin-like proteases to form mature spikes (15, 29). Multiple endocytosis motifs in the gp41 cytoplasmic tail lead to only minor quantities of Env being exposed at the cell surface at any given time (7, 40). Recent data demonstrated that the conserved GYxxθ motif, a binding site for the clathrin adaptor protein AP-2 (3), in the membrane-proximal region of HIV-2 gp41 is required to promote Vpu-defective HIV-1 release from HeLa cells (1, 32). Based on experiments with HIV-1/HIV-2 chimeric envelopes, an additional requirement in the extracellular component was suggested (1). In this study we set out to examine the Vpu-like activity of HIV-2 envelope in light of the discovery of tetherin. We demonstrate that the HIV-2 Env is a tetherin antagonist, and we provide mechanistic insight into the basis of this antagonism.     

Identification of a Feline Leukemia Virus Variant That Can Use THTR1, FLVCR1, and FLVCR2 for Infection

The pathogenic subgroup C feline leukemia virus (FeLV-C) arises in infected cats as a result of mutations in the envelope (Env) of the subgroup A FeLV (FeLV-A). To better understand emergence of FeLV-C and potential FeLV intermediates that may arise, we characterized FeLV Env sequences from the primary FY981 FeLV isolate previously derived from an anemic cat. Here, we report the characterization of the novel FY981 FeLV Env that is highly related to FeLV-A Env but whose variable region A (VRA) receptor recognition sequence partially resembles the VRA sequence from the prototypical FeLV-C/Sarma Env. Pseudotype viruses bearing FY981 Env were capable of infecting feline, human, and guinea pig cells, suggestive of a subgroup C phenotype, but also infected porcine ST-IOWA cells that are normally resistant to FeLV-C and to FeLV-A. Analysis of the host receptor used by FY981 suggests that FY981 can use both the FeLV-C receptor FLVCR1 and the feline FeLV-A receptor THTR1 for infection. However, our results suggest that FY981 infection of ST-IOWA cells is not mediated by the porcine homologue of FLVCR1 and THTR1 but by an alternative receptor, which we have now identified as the FLVCR1-related protein FLVCR2. Together, our results suggest that FY981 FeLV uses FLVCR1, FLVCR2, and THTR1 as receptors. Our findings suggest the possibility that pathogenic FeLV-C arises in FeLV-infected cats through intermediates that are multitropic in their receptor use.Feline leukemia viruses (FeLVs) are pathogenic retroviruses of domestic cats that induce proliferative, degenerative, and immunosuppressive disorders (17, 18, 27). Infected cats often contain a mixture of FeLVs that have been categorized into subgroups A, B, and C based on their interference and in vitro host range properties (39). These subgroups have been shown to be tightly associated with distinct feline diseases (17, 27). A fourth subgroup (T) that is highly related to FeLV-A has also been reported (26) and has been shown to be associated with immune deficiency (30). FeLV-A is the primary strain that is transmitted between cats and is the progenitor virus from which other subgroups arise. FeLV-B arises by recombination between endogenous retroviral sequences present in the cat genome and the gene encoding the FeLV-A envelope (Env) protein (32, 40, 42) that is responsible for host cell surface receptor recognition. FeLV-C and FeLV-T are formed by mutations in the FeLV-A Env gene (10, 27, 38). Env recombination and mutations are a major determinant of the host receptors used by the different FeLV subgroups (3, 23, 34, 46, 47).The emergence of pathogenic FeLV-C in cats infected with FeLV-A provides a classic example of Env mutations that switch the host receptor used for infection, leading to a fatal pathogenic disease in the host. The emergence of FeLV-C is tightly associated with red blood cell aplasia, a fatal feline anemia characterized by a specific disruption in erythroid progenitor cell development (2, 12, 19, 28). Moreover, FeLV-C emergence coincides with a switch in the host receptor used for infection from the thiamine transporter THTR1 (FeLV-A receptor) (23) to the heme exporter FLVCR1 (FeLV-C receptor) (34, 35, 46). Previous studies have suggested that the feline anemia is caused by the FeLV-C Env protein binding to, and disrupting, the cellular function of FLVCR1 (1, 34, 46). Indeed, expression of FeLV-C Env in hematopoietic stem cells (36) or disruption of FLVCR1 (21, 35) specifically disrupts early erythropoiesis, which mimics the anemia observed in cats with FeLV-C. Interestingly, the emergence of FeLV-C from FeLV-A is analogous to the emergence of cytopathic X4 strains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in individuals infected with the R5 strain of HIV-1. Analogous to the emergence of FeLV-C, X4 HIV-1 arises by Env mutations in the R5 HIV-1 strain, which leads to a switch in the coreceptor used for infection allowing an expansion in HIV-1 cell tropism and subsequently to accelerated AIDS (4, 8). However, whereas HIV-1 pathogenesis also involves emergence of variants or X4/R5 intermediates that can use multiple related coreceptors for infection (5, 8, 11), the mechanism of how FeLV-C emerges, in terms of the presence of FeLV-A/FeLV-C intermediates, has yet to be elucidated.To better understand the emergence of pathogenic FeLV-C in infected cats and potential FeLV variants/intermediates that may arise, we isolated and characterized FeLV Env sequences from a primary FeLV isolate derived from a cat with pure red cell aplasia. In this study, we report the isolation and characterization of the novel FY981 Env, a hybrid FeLV-A/FeLV-C Env that, when pseudotyped, can use FLVCR1, THTR1, and the FLVCR1-related FLVCR2 for infection. Our findings suggest that the FY981 Env could represent a potential FeLV intermediate that arises during the emergence of pathogenic FeLV-C.     

Potent and Broadly Reactive HIV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies Elicited by a Vaccinia Virus Vector Prime-C2V3C3 Polypeptide Boost Immunization Strategy

Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) infection affects about 1 to 2 million individuals, the majority living in West Africa, Europe, and India. As for HIV-1, new strategies for the prevention of HIV-2 infection are needed. Our aim was to produce new vaccine immunogens that elicit the production of broadly reactive HIV-2 neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). Native and truncated envelope proteins from the reference HIV-2ALI isolate were expressed in vaccinia virus or in bacteria. This source isolate was used due to its unique phenotype combining CD4 independence and CCR5 usage. NAbs were not elicited in BALB/c mice by single immunization with a truncated and fully glycosylated envelope gp125 (gp125t) or a recombinant polypeptide comprising the C2, V3, and C3 envelope regions (rpC2-C3). A strong and broad NAb response was, however, elicited in mice primed with gp125t expressed in vaccinia virus and boosted with rpC2-C3. Serum from these animals potently neutralized (median 50% neutralizing titer, 3,200) six of six highly divergent primary HIV-2 isolates. Coreceptor usage and the V3 sequence of NAb-sensitive isolates were similar to that of the vaccinating immunogen (HIV-2ALI). In contrast, NAbs were not reactive on three X4 isolates that displayed major changes in V3 loop sequence and structure. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that broadly reactive HIV-2 NAbs can be elicited by using a vaccinia virus vector-prime/rpC2-C3-boost immunization strategy and suggest a potential relationship between escape to neutralization and cell tropism.Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) infection affects 1 to 2 million individuals, most of whom live in India, West Africa, and Europe (17). HIV-2 has diversified into eight genetic groups named A to H, of which group A is by far the most prevalent worldwide. Nucleotide sequences of Env can differ up to 21% within a particular group and by over 35% between groups.The mortality rate in HIV-2-infected patients is at least twice that of uninfected individuals (26). Nonetheless, the majority of HIV-2-infected individuals survive as elite controllers (17). In the absence of antiretroviral therapy, the numbers of infected cells (39) and viral loads (36) are much lower among HIV-2-infected individuals than among those who are HIV-1 infected. This may be related to a more effective immune response produced against HIV-2. In fact, most HIV-2-infected individuals have proliferative T-cell responses and strong cytotoxic responses to Env and Gag proteins (17, 31). Moreover, autologous and heterologous neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) are raised in most HIV-2-infected individuals (8, 32, 48, 52), and the virus seems unable to escape from these antibodies (52). As for HIV-1, the antibody specificities that mediate HIV-2 neutralization and control are still elusive. The V3 region in the envelope gp125 has been identified as a neutralizing target by some but not by all investigators (3, 6, 7, 11, 40, 47, 54). Other weakly neutralizing epitopes were identified in the V1, V2, V4, and C5 regions in gp125 and in the COOH-terminal region of the gp41 ectodomain (6, 7, 41). A better understanding of the neutralizing determinants in the HIV-2 Env will provide crucial information regarding the most relevant targets for vaccine design.The development of immunogens that elicit the production of broadly reactive NAbs is considered the number one priority for the HIV-1 vaccine field (4, 42). Most current HIV-1 vaccine candidates intended to elicit such broadly reactive NAbs are based on purified envelope constructs that mimic the structure of the most conserved neutralizing epitopes in the native trimeric Env complex and/or on the expression of wild-type or modified envelope glycoproteins by different types of expression vectors (4, 5, 29, 49, 58). With respect to HIV-2, purified gp125 glycoprotein or synthetic peptides representing selected V3 regions from HIV-2 strain SBL6669 induced autologous and heterologous NAbs in mice or guinea pigs (6, 7, 22). However, immunization of cynomolgus monkeys with a subunit vaccine consisting of gp130 (HIV-2BEN) micelles offered little protection against autologous or heterologous challenge (34). Immunization of rhesus (19, 44, 45) and cynomolgus (1) monkeys with canarypox or attenuated vaccinia virus expressing several HIV-2 SBL6669 proteins, including the envelope glycoproteins, in combination with booster immunizations with gp160, gp125, or V3 synthetic peptides, elicited a weak neutralizing response and partial protection against autologous HIV-2 challenge. Likewise, vaccination of rhesus monkeys with immunogens derived from the historic HIV-2ROD strain failed to generate neutralizing antibodies and to protect against heterologous challenge (55). Finally, baboons inoculated with a DNA vaccine expressing the tat, nef, gag, and env genes of the HIV-2UC2 group B isolate were partially protected against autologous challenge without the production of neutralizing antibodies (33). These studies illustrate the urgent need for new vaccine immunogens and/or vaccination strategies that elicit the production of broadly reactive NAbs against HIV-2. The present study was designed to investigate in the mouse model the immunogenicity and neutralizing response elicited by novel recombinant envelope proteins derived from the reference primary HIV-2ALI isolate, when administered alone or in different prime-boost combinations.     

HIV-1 gp120 Determinants Proximal to the CD4 Binding Site Shift Protective Glycans That Are Targeted by Monoclonal Antibody 2G12

HIV-1 R5 envelopes vary considerably in their capacities to exploit low CD4 levels on macrophages for infection and in their sensitivities to the CD4 binding site (CD4bs) monoclonal antibody (MAb) b12 and the glycan-specific MAb 2G12. Here, we show that nonglycan determinants flanking the CD4 binding loop, which affect exposure of the CD4bs, also modulate 2G12 neutralization. Our data indicate that such residues act via a mechanism that involves shifts in the orientation of proximal glycans, thus modulating the sensitivity of 2G12 neutralization and affecting the overall presentation and structure of the glycan shield.The trimeric envelope (Env) spikes on HIV-1 virions are comprised of gp120 and gp41 heterodimers. gp120 is coated extensively with glycans (9, 11, 15) that are believed to protect the envelope from neutralizing antibodies. The extents and locations of glycosylation are variable and evolving (15). Thus, while some glycans are conserved, others appear or disappear in a host over the course of infection. Such changes may result in exposure or protection of functional envelope sites and can result from selection by different environmental pressures in vivo, including neutralizing antibodies.We previously reported that HIV-1 R5 envelopes varied considerably in tropism and neutralization sensitivity (3, 4, 12-14). We showed that highly macrophage-tropic R5 envelopes were more frequently detected in brain than in semen, blood, and lymph node (LN) samples (12, 14). The capacity of R5 envelopes to infect macrophages correlated with their ability to exploit low levels of cell surface CD4 for infection (12, 14). Determinants within and proximal to the CD4 binding site (CD4bs) were shown to modulate macrophage infectivity (3, 4, 5, 12, 13) and presumably acted by altering the avidity of the trimer for cell surface CD4. These determinants include residues proximal to the CD4 binding loop, which is likely the first part of the CD4bs contacted by CD4 (1). We also observed that macrophage-tropic R5 envelopes were frequently more resistant to the glycan-specific monoclonal antibody (MAb) 2G12 than were non-macrophage-tropic R5 Envs (13).Here, we investigated the envelope determinants of 2G12 sensitivity by using two HIV-1 envelopes that we used previously to map macrophage tropism determinants (4), B33 from brain and LN40 from lymph node tissue of an AIDS patient with neurological complications. While B33 imparts high levels of macrophage infectivity and is resistant to 2G12, LN40 Env confers very inefficient macrophage infection and is 2G12 sensitive (12-14).     

Balancing Reversion of Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte and Neutralizing Antibody Escape Mutations within Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Env upon Transmission

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope protein (Env) is subject to both neutralizing antibody (NAb) and CD8 T-cell (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte [CTL]) immune pressure. We studied the reversion of the Env CTL escape mutant virus to the wild type and the relationship between the reversion of CTL mutations with N-linked glycosylation site (NLGS)-driven NAb escape in pigtailed macaques. Env CTL mutations either did not revert to the wild type or only transiently reverted 5 to 7 weeks after infection. The CTL escape mutant reversion was coincident, for the same viral clones, with the loss of NLGS mutations. At one site studied, both CTL and NLGS mutations were needed to confer NAb escape. We conclude that CTL and NAb escape within Env can be tightly linked, suggesting opportunities to induce effective multicomponent anti-Env immunity.CD8 T-cell responses against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have long been observed to select for viral variants that avoid cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) recognition (2, 5, 15, 18, 27). These immune escape mutations may, however, result in reduced replication competence (“fitness cost”) (11, 20, 26). CTL escape variants have been shown to revert to the wild type (WT) upon passage to major histocompatibility complex-mismatched hosts, both in macaques with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) or chimeric SIV/HIV (SHIV) infection (11, 12) and in humans with HIV type 1 (HIV-1) infection (1, 19).Most analyses of CTL escape and reversion have studied Gag CTL epitopes known to facilitate control of viremia (7, 14, 21, 30). Fewer analyses have studied Env-specific CTL epitopes. Recent sequencing studies suggest the potential for mutations within predicted HIV-1 Env-specific CTL epitopes to undergo reversion to the WT (16, 23). Env-specific CTL responses may, however, have less impact on viral control of both HIV-1 and SIV/SHIV than do Gag CTL responses (17, 24, 25), presumably reflecting either less-potent inhibition of viral replication or minimal fitness cost of escape (9).Serial viral escape from antibody pressure also occurs in both macaques and humans (3, 13, 28). Env is extensively glycosylated, and this “evolving glycan shield” can sterically block antibody binding without mutation at the antibody-binding site (8, 16, 31). Mutations at glycosylation sites, as well as other mutations, are associated with escape from neutralizing antibody (NAb) responses (4, 13, 29). Mutations in the amino acid sequences of N-linked glycosylation sites (NLGS) can alter the packing of the glycan cloud that surrounds the virion, by a loss, gain, or shift of an NLGS (32), thus facilitating NAb escape.Env is the only viral protein targeted by both CTL and NAb responses. The serial viral escape from both Env-specific CTL and NAb responses could have implications for viral fitness and the reversion of multiple mutations upon transmission to naïve hosts.We previously identified three common HIV-1 Env-specific CD8 T cell epitopes, RY8_788-795, SP9_110-118, and NL9_671-679, and their immune escape patterns in pigtail macaques (Macaca nemestrina) infected with SHIV_mn229 (25). SHIV_mn229 is a chimeric virus constructed from an SIV_mac239 backbone and an HIV-1_HXB2 env fragment that was passaged through macaques to become pathogenic (11). This earlier work provided an opportunity for detailed studies of how viruses with Env-specific CTL escape mutations, as well as mutations in adjacent NLGS, evolve when transmitted to naïve pigtail macaques.     

Env-Expressing Autologous T Lymphocytes Induce Neutralizing Antibody and Afford Marked Protection against Feline Immunodeficiency Virus

The envelope (Env) glycoproteins of HIV and other lentiviruses possess neutralization and other protective epitopes, yet all attempts to induce protective immunity using Env as the only immunogen have either failed or afforded minimal levels of protection. In a novel prime-boost approach, specific-pathogen-free cats were primed with a plasmid expressing Env of feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) and feline granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and then boosted with their own T lymphocytes transduced ex vivo to produce the same Env and interleukin 15 (3 × 10⁶ to 10 × 10⁶ viable cells/cat). After the boost, the vaccinees developed elevated immune responses, including virus-neutralizing antibodies (NA). Challenge with an ex vivo preparation of FIV readily infected all eight control cats (four mock vaccinated and four naïve) and produced a marked decline in the proportion of peripheral CD4 T cells. In contrast, five of seven vaccinees showed little or no traces of infection, and the remaining two had reduced viral loads and underwent no changes in proportions of CD4 T cells. Interestingly, the viral loads of the vaccinees were inversely correlated to the titers of NA. The findings support the concept that Env is a valuable immunogen but needs to be administered in a way that permits the expression of its full protective potential.Despite years of intense research, a truly protective AIDS vaccine is far away. Suboptimal immunogenicity, inadequate antigen presentation, and inappropriate immune system activation are believed to have contributed to these disappointing results. However, several lines of evidence suggest that the control or prevention of infection is possible. For example, despite repeated exposures, some individuals escape infection or delay disease progression after being infected (1, 14, 15). Furthermore, passively infused neutralizing antibodies (NA) (28, 42, 51) or endogenously expressed NA derivatives (29) have been shown to provide protection against intravenous simian immunodeficiency virus challenge. On the other hand, data from several vaccine experiments suggest that cellular immunity is an important factor for protection (6, 32). Therefore, while immune protection against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and other lentiviruses appears feasible, the strategies for eliciting it remain elusive.Because of its crucial role in viral replication and infectivity, the HIV envelope (Env) is an attractive immunogen and has been included in nearly all vaccine formulations tested so far (28, 30, 31). Env surface (SU) and transmembrane glycoproteins (gp) are actively targeted by the immune system (9, 10, 47), and Env-specific antibodies and cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) are produced early in infection. The appearance of these effectors also coincides with the decline of viremia during the acute phase of infection (30, 32). Individuals who control HIV infection in the absence of antiretroviral therapy have Env-specific NA and CTL responses that are effective against a wide spectrum of viral strains (14, 23, 35, 52, 60). At least some of the potentially protective epitopes in Env appear to interact with the cellular receptors during viral entry and are therefore highly conserved among isolates (31, 33, 39, 63). However, these epitopes have complex secondary and tertiary structures and are only transiently exposed by the structural changes that occur during the interaction between Env and its receptors (10, 11, 28). As a consequence, these epitopes are usually concealed from the immune system, and this may explain, at least in part, why Env-based vaccines have failed to show protective efficacy. Indeed, data from previous studies suggested that protection may be most effectively triggered by nascent viral proteins (22, 28, 30, 48, 62).We have conducted a proof-of-concept study to evaluate whether presenting Env to the immune system in a manner as close as possible to what occurs in the context of a natural infection may confer some protective advantage. The study was carried out with feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV), a lentivirus similar to HIV that establishes persistent infections and causes an AIDS-like disease in domestic cats. As far as it is understood, FIV evades immune surveillance through mechanisms similar to those exploited by HIV, and attempts to develop an effective FIV vaccine have met with difficulties similar to those encountered with AIDS vaccines (25, 37, 66). In particular, attempts to use FIV Env as a protective immunogen have repeatedly failed (13, 38, 58). Here we report the result of one experiment in which specific-pathogen-free (SPF) cats primed with a DNA immunogen encoding FIV Env and feline granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and boosted with viable, autologous T lymphocytes ex vivo that were transduced to express Env and feline interleukin 15 (IL-15) showed a remarkable level of protection against challenge with ex vivo FIV. Consistent with recent findings indicating the importance of NA in controlling lentiviral infections (1, 59, 63), among the immunological parameters investigated, only the titers of NA correlated inversely with protection. Collectively, the findings support the notion that Env is a valuable vaccine immunogen but needs to be administered in a way that permits the expression of its full protective potential.     

Envelope-Modified Single-Cycle Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Selectively Enhances Antibody Responses and Partially Protects against Repeated,Low-Dose Vaginal Challenge

Immunization of rhesus macaques with strains of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) that are limited to a single cycle of infection elicits T-cell responses to multiple viral gene products and antibodies capable of neutralizing lab-adapted SIV, but not neutralization-resistant primary isolates of SIV. In an effort to improve upon the antibody responses, we immunized rhesus macaques with three strains of single-cycle SIV (scSIV) that express envelope glycoproteins modified to lack structural features thought to interfere with the development of neutralizing antibodies. These envelope-modified strains of scSIV lacked either five potential N-linked glycosylation sites in gp120, three potential N-linked glycosylation sites in gp41, or 100 amino acids in the V1V2 region of gp120. Three doses consisting of a mixture of the three envelope-modified strains of scSIV were administered on weeks 0, 6, and 12, followed by two booster inoculations with vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) G trans-complemented scSIV on weeks 18 and 24. Although this immunization regimen did not elicit antibodies capable of detectably neutralizing SIV_mac239 or SIV_mac251_UCD, neutralizing antibody titers to the envelope-modified strains were selectively enhanced. Virus-specific antibodies and T cells were observed in the vaginal mucosa. After 20 weeks of repeated, low-dose vaginal challenge with SIV_mac251_UCD, six of eight immunized animals versus six of six naïve controls became infected. Although immunization did not significantly reduce the likelihood of acquiring immunodeficiency virus infection, statistically significant reductions in peak and set point viral loads were observed in the immunized animals relative to the naïve control animals.Development of a safe and effective vaccine for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is an urgent public health priority, but remains a formidable scientific challenge. Passive transfer experiments in macaques demonstrate neutralizing antibodies can prevent infection by laboratory-engineered simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) strains (6, 33, 34, 53, 59). However, no current vaccine approach is capable of eliciting antibodies that neutralize primary isolates with neutralization-resistant envelope glycoproteins. Virus-specific T-cell responses can be elicited by prime-boost strategies utilizing recombinant DNA and/or viral vectors (3, 10, 11, 16, 36, 73, 77, 78), which confer containment of viral loads following challenge with SHIV_89.6P (3, 13, 66, 68). Unfortunately, similar vaccine regimens are much less effective against SIV_mac239 and SIV_mac251 (12, 16, 31, 36, 73), which bear closer resemblance to most transmitted HIV-1 isolates in their inability to utilize CXCR4 as a coreceptor (18, 23, 24, 88) and inherent high degree of resistance to neutralization by antibodies or soluble CD4 (43, 55, 56). Live, attenuated SIV can provide apparent sterile protection against challenge with SIV_mac239 and SIV_mac251 or at least contain viral replication below the limit of detection (20, 22, 80). Due to the potential of the attenuated viruses themselves to cause disease in neonatal rhesus macaques (5, 7, 81) and to revert to a pathogenic phenotype through the accumulation of mutations over prolonged periods of replication in adult animals (2, 35, 76), attenuated HIV-1 is not under consideration for use in humans.As an experimental vaccine approach designed to retain many of the features of live, attenuated SIV, without the risk of reversion to a pathogenic phenotype, we and others devised genetic approaches for producing strains of SIV that are limited to a single cycle of infection (27, 28, 30, 38, 39, 45). In a previous study, immunization of rhesus macaques with single-cycle SIV (scSIV) trans-complemented with vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) G elicited potent virus-specific T-cell responses (39), which were comparable in magnitude to T-cell responses elicited by optimized prime-boost regimens based on recombinant DNA and viral vectors (3, 16, 36, 68, 73, 78). Antibodies were elicited that neutralized lab-adapted SIV_mac251_LA (39). However, despite the presentation of the native, trimeric SIV envelope glycoprotein (Env) on the surface of infected cells and virions, none of the scSIV-immunized macaques developed antibody responses that neutralized SIV_mac239 (39). Therefore, we have now introduced Env modifications into scSIV that facilitate the development of neutralizing antibodies.Most primate lentiviral envelope glycoproteins are inherently resistant to neutralizing antibodies due to structural and thermodynamic properties that have evolved to enable persistent replication in the face of vigorous antibody responses (17, 46, 47, 64, 71, 75, 79, 83, 85). Among these, extensive N-linked glycosylation renders much of the Env surface inaccessible to antibodies (17, 48, 60, 63, 75). Removal of N-linked glycans from gp120 or gp41 by mutagenesis facilitates the induction of antibodies to epitopes that are occluded by these carbohydrates in the wild-type virus (64, 85). Consequently, antibodies from animals infected with glycan-deficient strains neutralize these strains better than antibodies from animals infected with the fully glycosylated SIV_mac239 parental strain (64, 85). Most importantly with regard to immunogen design, animals infected with the glycan-deficient strains developed higher neutralizing antibody titers against wild-type SIV_mac239 (64, 85). Additionally, the removal of a single N-linked glycan in gp120 enhanced the induction of neutralizing antibodies against SHIV_89.6P and SHIV_SF162 in a prime-boost strategy by 20-fold (50). These observations suggest that potential neutralization determinants accessible in the wild-type Env are poorly immunogenic unless specific N-linked glycans in gp120 and gp41 are eliminated by mutagenesis.The variable loop regions 1 and 2 (V1V2) of HIV-1 and SIV gp120 may also interfere with the development of neutralizing antibodies. Deletion of V1V2 from HIV-1 gp120 permitted neutralizing monoclonal antibodies to CD4-inducible epitopes to bind to gp120 in the absence of CD4, suggesting that V1V2 occludes potential neutralization determinants prior to the engagement of CD4 (82). A deletion in V2 of HIV-1 Env-exposed epitopes was conserved between clades (69), improved the ability of a secreted Env trimer to elicit neutralizing antibodies (9), and was present in a vaccine that conferred complete protection against SHIV_SF162P4 (8). A deletion of 100 amino acids in V1V2 of SIV_mac239 rendered the virus sensitive to monoclonal antibodies with various specificities (41). Furthermore, three of five macaques experimentally infected with SIV_mac239 with V1V2 deleted resisted superinfection with wild-type SIV_mac239 (51). Thus, occlusion of potential neutralization determinants by the V1V2 loop structure may contribute to the poor immunogenicity of the wild-type envelope glycoprotein.Here we tested the hypothesis that antibody responses to scSIV could be improved by immunizing macaques with strains of scSIV engineered to eliminate structural features that interfere with the development of neutralizing antibodies. Antibodies to Env-modified strains were selectively enhanced, but these did not neutralize the wild-type SIV strains. We then tested the hypothesis that immunization might prevent infection in a repeated, low-dose vaginal challenge model of heterosexual HIV-1 transmission. Indeed, while all six naïve control animals became infected, two of eight immunized animals remained uninfected after 20 weeks of repeated vaginal challenge. Relative to the naïve control group, reductions in peak and set point viral loads were statistically significant in the immunized animals that became infected.