Intermolecular complementation of the kinase activity of CheA

CheA is a dimeric autophosphorylating protein kinase that plays a critical role in the signal transduction network controlling chemotaxis In Escherichia coli. The autophosphorylation reaction was analysed using mutant proteins defective in kinase and regulatory functions. Proteins in which the site of autophosphorylation was mutated (CheA48HQ) or missing (CheA_s) were found to phosphorylate the kinase-defective mutant, CheA470GK. The kinetics of this reaction support the hypothesis that autophosphorylation is the result of trans-phosphorylation within a dimer. The carboxy-terminal portion of CheA was previously shown to be dispensable for autophosphorylation, but required for regulation in response to environmental signals transmitted through a transducer and CheW. Mixing of CheA48HQ or CheA470GK with a truncated protein lacking this regulatory domain demonstrated that regulated autophosphoryltion requires the presence of both carboxy-terminal portions in a CheA dimer. These results indicate that the dimeric form of CheA plays an integral role in signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis.     

Chemotaxis in Rhodobacter sphaeroides requires an atypical histidine protein kinase

Rhodobacter sphaeroides has a complex chemosensory system comprising two classic CheAs, two atypical CheAs, and eight response regulators (six CheYs and two CheBs). The classic CheAs, CheA(1) and CheA(2), have similar domain structures to Escherichia coli CheA, whereas the atypical CheAs, CheA(3) and CheA(4), lack some of the domains found in E. coli CheA. CheA(2), CheA(3), and CheA(4) are all essential for chemotaxis. Here we demonstrate that CheA(3) and CheA(4) are both unable to undergo ATP-dependent autophosphorylation, however, CheA(4) is able to phosphorylate CheA(3). The in vitro kinetics of this phosphorylation reaction were consistent with a reaction mechanism in which CheA(3) associates with a CheA(4) dimer forming a complex, CheA(3)A(4). To the best of our knowledge, CheA(3)A(4) is the first characterized histidine protein kinase where the subunits are encoded by distinct genes. Selective phosphotransfer was observed from CheA(3)-P to the response regulators CheY(1), CheY(6), and CheB(2). Using phosphorylation site and kinase domain mutants of CheA we show that phosphosignaling involving CheA(2), CheA(3), and CheA(4) is essential for chemotaxis in R. sphaeroides. Interestingly, CheA(3) was not phosphorylated in vitro by CheA(1) or CheA(2), although CheA(1) and CheA(2) mutants with defective kinase domains were phosphorylated by CheA(4). Because in vivo CheA(3) and CheA(4) localize to the cytoplasmic chemotaxis cluster, while CheA(2) localizes to the polar chemotaxis cluster, it is likely that the physical separation of CheA(2) and CheA(4) prevents unwanted cross-talk between these CheAs.     

The short form of CheA couples chemoreception to CheA phosphorylation.

Escherichia coli cells express two forms of the chemotaxis-associated CheA protein, CheAL and CheAS, as the result of translational initiation at two distinct in-frame initiation sites in the gene cheA. The long form, CheAL, plays a crucial role in chemotactic signal transduction. As a histidine protein kinase, it first autophosphorylates at amino acid His-48; then, it phosphorylates two other chemotaxis proteins, CheY and CheB. The short form, CheAS, lacks the amino-terminal 97 amino acids of CheAL and, therefore, does not contain the site of autophosphorylation. However, it does retain a functional kinase domain. As a consequence, CheAS can mediate transphosphorylation of kinase-deficient CheAL variants. Here we demonstrate in vitro that CheAS also can mediate transphosphorylation of a CheAL variant that lacks the C-terminal segment, a portion of the protein which is thought to interact with CheW and the chemoreceptors. The presence of CheW and the chemoreceptor Tsr enhances this activity and results in modulation of the transphosphorylation rate in response to the Tsr ligand, L-serine. Because CheAS can mediate this activity, it can restore chemotactic ability to Escherichia coli cells that express this truncated CheAL variant.     

Chemotactic signaling by the P1 phosphorylation domain liberated from the CheA histidine kinase of Escherichia coli.

CheA is a histidine kinase central to the signal transduction pathway for chemotaxis in Escherichia coli. CheA autophosphorylates at His-48, with ATP as the phosphodonor, and then donates its phosphoryl groups to two aspartate autokinases, CheY and CheB. Phospho-CheY controls the flagellar motors, whereas phospho-CheB participates in sensory adaptation. Polypeptides encompassing the N-terminal P1 domain of CheA can be transphosphorylated in vitro by the CheA catalytic domain and yet have no deleterious effect on chemotactic ability when expressed at high levels in wild-type cells. To find out why, we examined the effects of a purified P1 fragment, CheA[1-149], on CheA-related signaling activities in vitro and devised in vivo assays for those same activities. Although readily phosphorylated by CheA[260-537], the CheA catalytic domain, CheA[1-149], was a poor substrate for transphosphorylation by full-length CheA molecules, implying that the resident P1 domain monopolizes the CheA catalytic center. CheA-H48Q, a nonphosphorylatable mutant, failed to transphosphorylate CheA[1-149], suggesting that phosphorylation of the P1 domain in cis may alleviate the exclusion effect. In agreement with these findings, a 40-fold excess of CheA[1-149] fragments did not impair the CheA autophosphorylation reaction. CheA[1-149] did acquire phosphoryl groups via reversible phosphotransfer reactions with CheB and CheY molecules. An H48Q mutant of CheA[1-149] could not participate in these reactions, indicating that His-48 is probably the substrate site. The low level of efficiency of these phosphotransfer reactions and the inability of CheA[1-149] to interfere with CheA autophosphorylation most likely account for the failure of liberated P1 domains to jam chemotactic signaling in wild-type cells. However, an excess of CheA[1-149] fragments was able to support chemotactic signaling by P1-deficient cheA mutants, demonstrating that CheA[1-149] fragments have both transphosphorylation and phosphotransfer capability in vivo.     

Phosphotransfer in Rhodobacter sphaeroides chemotaxis

The two-component sensing system controlling bacterial chemotaxis is one of the best studied in biology. Rhodobacter sphaeroides has a complex chemosensory pathway comprising two histidine protein kinases (CheAs) and eight downstream response regulators (six CheYs and two CheBs) rather than the single copies of each as in Escherichia coli. We used in vitro analysis of phosphotransfer to start to determine why R.sphaeroides has these multiple homologues. CheA(1) and CheA(2) contain all the key motifs identified in the histidine protein kinase family, except for conservative substitutions (F-L and F-I) within the F box of CheA(2), and both are capable of ATP-dependent autophosphorylation. While the K(m) values for ATP of CheA(1) and CheA(2) were similar to that of E.coli, the k(cat) value was three times lower, but similar to that measured for the related Sinorhizobium meliloti CheA. However, the two CheAs differed both in their ability to phosphorylate the various response regulators and the rates of phosphotransfer. CheA(2) phosphorylated all of the CheYs and both CheBs, whilst CheA(1) did not phosphorylate either CheB and phosphorylated only the response regulators encoded within its own genetic locus (CheY(1), CheY(2), and CheY(5)) and CheY(3). The dephosphorylation rates of the R.sphaeroides CheBs were much slower than the E.coli CheB. The dephosphorylation rate of CheY(6), encoded by the third chemosensory locus, was ten times faster than that of the E.coli CheY. However, the dephosphorylation rates of the remaining R.sphaeroides CheYs were comparable to that of E.coli CheY.     

Reconstruction of the chemotaxis receptor-kinase assembly

In bacterial chemotaxis, an assembly of transmembrane receptors, the CheA histidine kinase and the adaptor protein CheW processes environmental stimuli to regulate motility. The structure of a Thermotoga maritima receptor cytoplasmic domain defines CheA interaction regions and metal ion-coordinating charge centers that undergo chemical modification to tune receptor response. Dimeric CheA-CheW, defined by crystallography and pulsed ESR, positions two CheWs to form a cleft that is lined with residues important for receptor interactions and sized to clamp one receptor dimer. CheW residues involved in kinase activation map to interfaces that orient the CheW clamps. CheA regulatory domains associate in crystals through conserved hydrophobic surfaces. Such CheA self-contacts align the CheW receptor clamps for binding receptor tips. Linking layers of ternary complexes with close-packed receptors generates a lattice with reasonable component ratios, cooperative interactions among receptors and accessible sites for modification enzymes.     

Identification of an anchor residue for CheA-CheY interactions in the chemotaxis system of Escherichia coli

Transfer of a phosphoryl group from autophosphorylated CheA (P-CheA) to CheY is an important step in the bacterial chemotaxis signal transduction pathway. This reaction involves CheY (i) binding to the P2 domain of P-CheA and then (ii) acquiring the phosphoryl group from the P1 domain. Crystal structures indicated numerous side chain interactions at the CheY-P2 binding interface. To investigate the individual contributions of the P2 side chains involved in these contacts, we analyzed the effects of eight alanine substitution mutations on CheA-CheY binding interactions. An F214A substitution in P2 caused ～1,000-fold reduction in CheA-CheY binding affinity, while Ala substitutions at other P2 positions had small effects (E171A, E178A, and I216A) or no detectable effects (H181A, D202A, D207A, and C213A) on binding affinity. These results are discussed in relation to previous in silico predictions of hot-spot and anchor positions at the CheA-CheY interface. We also investigated the consequences of these mutations for chemotaxis signal transduction in living cells. CheA(F214A) was defective in mediating localization of CheY-YFP to the large clusters of signaling proteins that form at the poles of Escherichia coli cells, while the other CheA variants did not differ from wild-type (wt) CheA (CheA(wt)) in this regard. In our set of mutants, only CheA(F214A) exhibited a markedly diminished ability to support chemotaxis in motility agar assays. Surprisingly, however, in FRET assays that monitored receptor-regulated production of phospho-CheY, CheA(F214A) (and each of the other Ala substitution mutants) performed just as well as CheA(wt). Overall, our findings indicate that F214 serves as an anchor residue at the CheA-CheY interface and makes an important contribution to the binding energy in vitro and in vivo; however, loss of this contribution does not have a large negative effect on the overall ability of the signaling pathway to modulate P-CheY levels in response to chemoattractants.     

Polar clustering of the chemoreceptor complex in Escherichia coli occurs in the absence of complete CheA function

Bacterial chemotaxis requires a phosphorelay system initiated by the interaction of a ligand with its chemoreceptor and culminating in a change in the directional bias of flagellar rotation. Chemoreceptor-CheA-CheW ternary complexes mediate transduction of the chemotactic signal. In vivo, these complexes cluster predominantly in large groups at the cell poles. The function of chemoreceptor clustering is currently unknown. To gain insight into the relationship between signaling and chemoreceptor clustering, we examined these properties in several Escherichia coli mutant strains that produce CheA variants altered in their ability to mediate chemotaxis, autophosphorylate, or bind ATP. We show here that polar clustering of chemoreceptor complexes does not require functional CheA protein, although maximal clustering occurred only in chemotactically competent cells. Surprisingly, in cells containing a minimum of 13 gold particles at the cell pole, a significant level of clustering was observed in the absence of CheA, demonstrating that CheA is not absolutely essential for chemoreceptor clustering. Nonchemotactic cells expressing only CheA(S), a C-terminal CheA deletion, or CheA bearing a mutation in the ATP-binding site mediated slightly less than maximal chemoreceptor clustering. Cells expressing only full-length CheA (CheA(L)) from either a chromosomal or a plasmid-encoded allele displayed a methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein localization pattern indistinguishable from that of strains carrying both CheA(L) and CheA(S), demonstrating that CheA(L) alone can mediate polar clustering.     

Bacillus subtilis CheN, a homolog of CheA, the central regulator of chemotaxis in Escherichia coli.

The Bacillus subtilis cheN gene was isolated, sequenced, and expressed. It encodes a large negatively charged protein with a molecular weight of approximately 74,000. The predicted protein sequence has 33 to 34% identity with the Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium CheA and Myxococcus xanthus FrzE sequences. These proteins are found to autophosphorylate and are members of the same histidine kinase signal modulating family. CheN has several conserved regions (including the histidine that is phosphorylated in CheA) that coincide with other autophosphorylated signal transducers. A null mutant is defective in attractant-induced methanol formation and shows no behavioral response to chemoeffectors. These results imply that in B. subtilis the mechanism of chemotaxis involves phosphoryl transfer similar to that in E. coli. However, the CheN null mutant mostly tumbles, whereas CheA mutants swim smoothly, and only in B. subtilis does excitation lead to methyl transfer and methanol formation. Thus, the overall mechanism of chemotaxis is different in the two organisms.     

Histidine kinases: diversity of domain organization

Histidine kinases play a major role in signal transduction in prokaryotes for the cellular adaptation to environmental conditions and stresses. Recent progress in the three-dimensional structure determination of two representative members of histidine kinases, EnvZ (class I) and CheA (class II), has revealed common structural features, as well as a kinase catalytic motif topologically similar to those of the ATP-binding domains of a few ATPases. They have also disclosed that there are significant differences in domain organization between class I and II histidine kinases, possibly reflecting their distinct locations, functions and regulatory mechanisms. In spite of this diversity, both class I and II histidine kinases use similar four-helix bundle motifs to relay phosphoryl groups from ATP to regulatory domains of response regulators. The previously known so-called transmitter domain of histidine kinase is further dissected into two domains: a CA (Catalytic ATP-binding) domain and a DHp (Dimerization Histidine phosphotransfer) domain for class I, or a CA domain and an HPt (Histidine-containing Phosphotransfer) domain for class II histidine kinases. From a comparative analysis of the CA domains of EnvZ, CheA and their ATPase homologues, the core elements of the CA domain have been derived. The apparent resemblance between DHp and HPt domains is only superficial, and significant differences between them are discussed.     

Mutational Analysis of the P1 Phosphorylation Domain in Escherichia coli CheA,the Signaling Kinase for Chemotaxis

The histidine autokinase CheA functions as the central processing unit in the Escherichia coli chemotaxis signaling machinery. CheA receives autophosphorylation control inputs from chemoreceptors and in turn regulates the flux of signaling phosphates to the CheY and CheB response regulator proteins. Phospho-CheY changes the direction of flagellar rotation; phospho-CheB covalently modifies receptor molecules during sensory adaptation. The CheA phosphorylation site, His-48, lies in the N-terminal P1 domain, which must engage the CheA ATP-binding domain, P4, to initiate an autophosphorylation reaction cycle. The docking determinants for the P1-P4 interaction have not been experimentally identified. We devised mutant screens to isolate P1 domains with impaired autophosphorylation or phosphotransfer activities. One set of P1 mutants identified amino acid replacements at surface-exposed residues distal to His-48. These lesions reduced the rate of P1 transphosphorylation by P4. However, once phosphorylated, the mutant P1 domains transferred phosphate to CheY at the wild-type rate. Thus, these P1 mutants appear to define interaction determinants for P1-P4 docking during the CheA autophosphorylation reaction.     

Structural and chemical requirements for histidine phosphorylation by the chemotaxis kinase CheA

The CheA histidine kinase initiates the signal transduction pathway of bacterial chemotaxis by autophosphorylating a conserved histidine on its phosphotransferase domain (P1). Site-directed mutations of neighboring conserved P1 residues (Glu-67, Lys-48, and His-64) show that a hydrogen-bonding network controls the reactivity of the phospho-accepting His (His-45) in Thermotoga maritima CheA. In particular, the conservative mutation E67Q dramatically reduces phosphotransfer to P1 without significantly affecting the affinity of P1 for the CheA ATP-binding domain. High resolution crystallographic studies revealed that although all mutants disrupt the hydrogen-bonding network to varying degrees, none affect the conformation of His-45. 15N-NMR chemical shift studies instead showed that Glu-67 functions to stabilize the unfavored N(delta1)H tautomer of His-45, thereby rendering the N(epsilon2) imidazole unprotonated and well positioned for accepting the ATP phosphoryl group.     

The H box-harboring domain is key to the function of the Salmonella enterica PhoQ Mg2+-sensor in the recognition of its partner PhoP

In two-component signaling systems, the transduction strategy relies on a conserved His-Asp phosphoryl exchange between the sensor histidine kinase and its cognate response-regulator, and structural and functional consensus motifs are found when comparing either the diverse histidine kinases or response regulators present in a single cell. Therefore, the mechanism that guarantees the specific recognition between partners of an individual pair is essential to unequivocally generate the appropriate adaptive response. Based on sequence alignments with other histidine kinases, we dissected the Salmonella enterica Mg2+-sensor PhoQ in different subdomains and examined by in vivo and in vitro assays its interaction with the associated response regulator PhoP. This signal transduction system allows Salmonella to withstand environmental Mg2+ limitation by triggering gene expression that is vital throughout the infective cycle in the host. Using resonant mirror biosensor technology, we calculated the kinetic and equilibrium binding constants and determined that the His-phosphotransfer domain is essential for the PhoQ specific recognition and interaction with PhoP. Additionally, we show the role of this domain in the bimolecular transphosphorylation and provide evidence that this region undergoes dimerization.     

Specificity of localization and phosphotransfer in the CheA proteins of Rhodobacter sphaeroides

Specificity of protein–protein interactions plays a vital role in signal transduction. The chemosensory pathway of Rhodobacter sphaeroides comprises multiple homologues of chemotaxis proteins characterized in organisms such as Escherichia coli. Three CheA homologues are essential for chemotaxis in R. sphaeroides under laboratory conditions. These CheAs are differentially localized to two chemosensory clusters, one at the cell pole and one in the cytoplasm. The polar CheA, CheA₂, has the same domain structure as E. coli CheA and can phosphorylate all R. sphaeroides chemotaxis response regulators. CheA₃ and CheA₄ independently localize to the cytoplasmic cluster; each protein has a subset of the CheA domains, with CheA₃ phosphorylating CheA₄ together making a functional CheA protein. Interestingly, CheA₃‐P can only phosphorylate two response regulators, CheY₆ and CheB₂. R. sphaeroides CheAs exhibit two interesting differences in specificity: (i) the response regulators that they phosphorylate and (ii) the chemosensory cluster to which they localize. Using a domain‐swapping approach we investigated the role of the P1 and P5 CheA domains in determining these specificities. We show that the P1 domain is sufficient to determine which response regulators will be phosphorylated in vitro while the P5 domain is sufficient to localize the CheAs to a specific chemosensory cluster.     

Mechanism of CheA protein kinase activation in receptor signaling complexes.

The chemotaxis receptor for aspartate, Tar, generates responses by regulating the activity of an associated histidine kinase, CheA. Tar is composed of an extracellular sensory domain connected by a transmembrane sequence to a cytoplasmic signaling domain. The cytoplasmic domain fused to a leucine zipper dimerization domain forms soluble active ternary complexes with CheA and an adapter protein, CheW. The kinetics of kinase activity within these complexes compared to CheA alone indicate approximately a 50% decrease in the KM for ATP and a 100-fold increase in the Vmax. A truncated CheA construct that lacks the phosphoaccepting H-domain and the CheY/CheB-binding domain forms an activated ternary complex that is similar to the one formed by the full-length CheA protein. The Vmax of H-domain phosphorylation by this complex is enhanced approximately 60-fold, the KM for ATP decreased to 50%, and the KM for H-domain decreased to 20% of the values obtained with the same CheA construct in the absence of receptor and CheW. The kinetic data support a mechanism of CheA regulation that involves perturbation of an equilibrium between an inactive form where the H-domain is loosely bound and an active form where the H-domain is tightly associated with the CheA active site and properly positioned for phosphotransfer. The data are consistent with an asymmetric mechanism of CheA activation [Levit, M., Liu, I., Surette, M. G., and Stock, J. B. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 32057-32063] wherein only one phosphoaccepting domain of CheA at a time can interact with an active center within a CheA dimer.     

Structural analysis of bacterial chemotaxis proteins: components of a dynamic signaling system

Most motile bacteria are capable of directing their movement in response to chemical gradients, a behavior known as chemotaxis. The signal transduction system that mediates chemotaxis in enteric bacteria consists of a set of six cytoplasmic proteins that couple stimuli sensed by a family of transmembrane receptors to behavioral responses generated by the flagellar motors. Signal transduction occurs via a phosphotransfer pathway involving a histidine protein kinase, CheA, and a response regulator protein, CheY, that in its phosphorylated state, modulates the direction of flagellar rotation. Two auxiliary proteins, CheW and CheZ, and two receptor modification enzymes, methylesterase CheB and methyltransferase CheR, influence the flux of phosphoryl groups within this central pathway. This paper focuses on structural characteristics of the four signaling proteins (CheA, CheY, CheB, and CheR) for which NMR or x-ray crystal structures have been determined. The proteins are examined with respect to their signaling activities that involve reversible protein modifications and transient assembly of macromolecular complexes. A variety of data suggest conformational flexibility of these proteins, a feature consistent with their multiple roles in a dynamic signaling pathway.     

Solution structure of a complex of the histidine autokinase CheA with its substrate CheY

In the bacterial chemotaxis two-component signaling system, the histidine-containing phosphotransfer domain (the "P1" domain) of CheA receives a phosphoryl group from the catalytic domain (P4) of CheA and transfers it to the cognate response regulator (RR) CheY, which is docked by the P2 domain of CheA. Phosphorylated CheY then diffuses into the cytoplasm and interacts with the FliM moiety of the flagellar motors, thereby modulating the direction of flagellar rotation. Structures of various histidine phosphotransfer domains (HPt) complexed with their cognate RR domains have been reported. Unlike the Escherichia coli chemotaxis system, however, these systems lack the additional domains dedicated to binding to the response regulators, and the interaction of an HPt domain with an RR domain in the presence of such a domain has not been examined on a structural basis. In this study, we used modern nuclear magnetic resonance techniques to construct a model for the interaction of the E. coli CheA P1 domain (HPt) and CheY (RR) in the presence of the CheY-binding domain, P2. Our results indicate that the presence of P2 may lead to a slightly different relative orientation of the HPt and RR domains versus those seen in such complex structures previously reported.     

Cellular stoichiometry of the chemotaxis proteins in Bacillus subtilis

The chemoreceptor-CheA kinase-CheW coupling protein complex, with ancillary associated proteins, is at the heart of chemotactic signal transduction in bacteria. The goal of this work was to determine the cellular stoichiometry of the chemotaxis signaling proteins in Bacillus subtilis. Quantitative immunoblotting was used to determine the total number of chemotaxis proteins in a single cell of B. subtilis. Significantly higher levels of chemoreceptors and much lower levels of CheA kinase were measured in B. subtilis than in Escherichia coli. The resulting cellular ratio of chemoreceptor dimers per CheA dimer in B. subtilis is roughly 23.0 ± 4.5 compared to 3.4 ± 0.8 receptor dimers per CheA dimer observed in E. coli, but the ratios of the coupling protein CheW to the CheA dimer are nearly identical in the two organisms. The ratios of CheB to CheR in B. subtilis are also very similar, although the overall levels of modification enzymes are higher. When the potential binding partners of CheD are deleted, the levels of CheD drop significantly. This finding suggests that B. subtilis selectively degrades excess chemotaxis proteins to maintain optimum ratios. Finally, the two cytoplasmic receptors were observed to localize among the other receptors at the cell poles and appear to participate in the chemoreceptor complex. These results suggest that there are many novel features of B. subtilis chemotaxis compared with the mechanism in E. coli, but they are built on a common core.     

The carboxy-terminal portion of the CheA kinase mediates regulation of autophosphorylation by transducer and CheW.

The CheA kinase is a central protein in the signal transduction network that controls chemotaxis in Escherichia coli. CheA receives information from a transmembrane receptor (e.g., Tar) and CheW proteins and relays it to the CheB and CheY proteins. The biochemical activities of CheA proteins truncated at various distances from the carboxy terminus were examined. The carboxy-terminal portion of CheA regulates autophosphorylation in response to environmental signals transmitted through Tar and CheW. The central portion of CheA is required for autophosphorylation and is also presumably involved in dimer formation. The amino-terminal portion of CheA was previously shown to contain the site of autophosphorylation and to be able to transfer the phosphoryl group to CheB and CheY. These studies further delineate three functional domains of the CheA protein.     

Protein footprinting in a complex milieu: identifying the interaction surfaces of the chemotaxis adaptor protein CheW

Characterizing protein-protein interactions in a biologically relevant context is important for understanding the mechanisms of signal transduction. Most signal transduction systems are membrane associated and consist of large multiprotein complexes that undergo rapid reorganization—circumstances that present challenges to traditional structure determination methods. To study protein-protein interactions in a biologically relevant complex milieu, we employed a protein footprinting strategy based on isotope-coded affinity tag (ICAT) reagents. ICAT reagents are valuable tools for proteomics. Here, we show their utility in an alternative application—they are ideal for protein footprinting in complex backgrounds because the affinity tag moiety allows for enrichment of alkylated species prior to analysis. We employed a water-soluble ICAT reagent to monitor cysteine accessibility and thereby to identify residues involved in two different protein-protein interactions in the Escherichia coli chemotaxis signaling system. The chemotaxis system is an archetypal transmembrane signaling pathway in which a complex protein superstructure underlies sophisticated sensory performance. The formation of this superstructure depends on the adaptor protein CheW, which mediates a functionally important bridging interaction between transmembrane receptors and histidine kinase. ICAT footprinting was used to map the surfaces of CheW that interact with the large multidomain histidine kinase CheA, as well as with the transmembrane chemoreceptor Tsr in native E. coli membranes. By leveraging the affinity tag, we successfully identified CheW surfaces responsible for CheA-Tsr interaction. The proximity of the CheA and Tsr binding sites on CheW suggests the formation of a composite CheW-Tsr surface for the recruitment of the signaling kinase to the chemoreceptor complex.