Cadherin dimers in cell-cell adhesion

While the critical function of classic cadherin in cell-cell junctions is well established, the molecular mechanism of cadherin-based adhesion remains unclear. The elusive but principal part of this adhesion process is the cadherin-cadherin interaction maintaining the intercellular contacts. This interaction is believed to be weak, suggesting that the adhesive contacts are strengthened by the cytoskeleton-dependent clustering of numerous cadherin molecules. An examination of cadherin homodimers in living cells has shown, however, that cadherin adhesive interaction is surprisingly strong. This observation implies that the strength of the adhesive contacts is regulated by the processes disintegrating cadherin dimers. The molecular structure of these dimers and mechanisms potentially responsible for their dynamics in living cells are discussed in this review.     

The kindest cuts of all: crystal structures of Kex2 and furin reveal secrets of precursor processing

Pro-hormone or pro-protein convertases are a conserved family of eukaryotic serine proteases found in the secretory pathway. These endoproteases mature precursors for peptides and proteins that perform a wide range of physiologically important and clinically relevant functions. The first member of this family to be identified was Kex2 in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. One mammalian member of this family - furin - is responsible for processing substrates that include insulin pro-receptor, human immunodeficiency virus gp160 glycoprotein, Ebola virus glycoprotein, and anthrax protective antigen. Recent determination of the crystal structures for the catalytic core domains of both Kex2 and furin - the first for any members of this family - provide remarkable insights and a new level of understanding of substrate specificity and catalysis by the pro-protein convertases.     

Regulation of Cadherin Trafficking

Cadherins are a large family of cell–cell adhesion molecules that tether cytoskeletal networks of actin and intermediate filaments to the plasma membrane. This function of cadherins promotes tissue organization and integrity, as demonstrated by numerous disease states that are characterized by the loss of cadherin-based adhesion. However, plasticity in cell adhesion is often required in cellular processes such as tissue patterning during development and epithelial migration during wound healing. Recent work has revealed a pivotal role for various membrane trafficking pathways in regulating cellular transitions between quiescent adhesive states and more dynamic phenotypes. The regulation of cadherins by membrane trafficking is emerging as a key player in this balancing act, and studies are beginning to reveal how this process goes awry in the context of disease. This review summarizes the current understanding of how cadherins are routed and how the interface between cadherins and membrane trafficking pathways regulates cell surface adhesive potential. Particular emphasis is placed on the regulation of cadherin trafficking by catenins and the interplay between growth factor signaling pathways and cadherin endocytosis.     

Adhesive and Signaling Functions of Cadherins and Catenins in Vertebrate Development

Properly regulated intercellular adhesion is critical for normal development of all metazoan organisms. Adherens junctions play an especially prominent role in development because they link the adhesive function of cadherin–catenin protein complexes to the dynamic forces of the actin cytoskeleton, which helps to orchestrate a spatially confined and very dynamic assembly of intercellular connections. Intriguingly, in addition to maintaining intercellular adhesion, cadherin–catenin proteins are linked to several major developmental signaling pathways crucial for normal morphogenesis. In this article we will highlight the key genetic studies that uncovered the role of cadherin–catenin proteins in vertebrate development and discuss the potential role of these proteins as molecular biosensors of external cellular microenvironment that may spatially confine signaling molecules and polarity cues to orchestrate cellular behavior throughout the complex process of normal morphogenesis.Development of any multicellular organism is impossible without a dynamic and properly regulated intercellular adhesion. Adhesive contacts between cells provide a physical anchoring system that is necessary to form highly organized tissues, and these contacts are essential for effective intercellular communication that ensures the homeostasis and survival of the entire organism. A number of unique developmental processes, including such early events as embryonic compaction and first cell fate specification, as well as later tissue morphogenesis and organogenesis, rely on a dynamic balance between cellular adhesion and migration. Cadherin–catenin protein complexes, which constitute the core of a specialized subtype of cellular adhesion structures termed adherens junctions (AJs), play a particularly important role during these processes. Apart from maintaining adhesive contacts at the cell–cell junctions, they are actively involved in epithelial-to-mesenchymal and mesenchymal-to-epithelial transitions, which are crucial to sustain the tissue plasticity during development. Most importantly, the components of cadherin–catenin complexes are tightly linked to several major signaling networks controlling cell division, differentiation, and apoptosis and this feature is crucial for the broad roles of the AJs throughout the vertebrate development (see Cavey and Lecuit 2009).This article will focus on the role of cadherin–catenin proteins in regulating the signaling events critical for vertebrate development. Altering the expression pattern of particular cadherin–catenin complex components in the developing embryo often leads to major developmental defects, which reflect their role in both signaling and mechanical adhesion. In this article, we will highlight crucial findings suggesting that cadherin–catenin complexes provide not only the structural integrity of the tissue, but may also serve as biosensors of the external cellular microenvironment that modulate cellular behavior and make individual cells work together to ensure the fitness of the entire organism.     

XPACE4 is a localized pro-protein convertase required for mesoderm induction and the cleavage of specific TGFbeta proteins in Xenopus development

XPACE4 is a member of the subtilisin/kexin family of pro-protein convertases. It cleaves many pro-proteins to release their active proteins, including members of the TGFbeta family of signaling molecules. Studies in mouse suggest it may have important roles in regulating embryonic tissue specification. Here, we examine the role of XPACE4 in Xenopus development and make three novel observations: first, XPACE4 is stored as maternal mRNA localized to the mitochondrial cloud and vegetal hemisphere of the oocyte; second, it is required for the endogenous mesoderm inducing activity of vegetal cells before gastrulation; and third, it has substrate-specific activity, cleaving Xnr1, Xnr2, Xnr3 and Vg1, but not Xnr5, Derriere or ActivinB pro-proteins. We conclude that maternal XPACE4 plays an important role in embryonic patterning by regulating the production of a subset of active mature TGFbeta proteins in specific sites.     

Evidence that tubulobulbar complexes in the seminiferous epithelium are involved with internalization of adhesion junctions

Tubulobulbar complexes may be part of the mechanism by which intercellular adhesion junctions are internalized by Sertoli cells during sperm release. These complexes develop in regions where Sertoli cells are attached to adjacent cells by intercellular adhesion junctions termed ectoplasmic specializations. At sites where Sertoli cells are attached to spermatid heads, tubulobulbar complexes consist of fingerlike processes of the spermatid plasma membrane, corresponding invaginations of the Sertoli cell plasma membrane, and a surrounding cuff of modified Sertoli cell cytoplasm. At the terminal ends of the complexes occur clusters of vesicles. Here we show that tubulobulbar complexes develop in regions previously occupied by ectoplasmic specializations and that the structures share similar molecular components. In addition, the adhesion molecules nectin 2 and nectin 3, found in the Sertoli cell and spermatid plasma membranes, respectively, are concentrated at the distal ends of tubulobulbar complexes. We also demonstrate that double membrane bounded vesicles are associated with the ends of tubulobulbar complexes and nectin 3 is present on spermatids, but is absent from spermatozoa released from the epithelium. These results are consistent with the conclusion that Sertoli cell and spermatid membrane adhesion domains are internalized together by tubulobulbar complexes. PKCalpha, a kinase associated with endocytosis of adhesion domains in other systems, is concentrated at tubulobulbar complexes, and antibodies to endosomal and lysosomal (LAMP1, SGP1) markers label the cluster of vesicles associated with the ends of tubulobulbar complexes. Our results are consistent with the conclusion that tubulobulbar complexes are involved with the disassembly of ectoplasmic specializations and with the internalization of intercellular membrane adhesion domains during sperm release.     

Cadherin function in junctional complex rearrangement and posttranslational control of cadherin expression

The role ofE-cadherin, a calcium-dependent adhesion protein, in organizing andmaintaining epithelial junctions was examined in detail by expressing afusion protein (GP2-Cad1) composed of the extracellular domain of anonadherent glycoprotein (GP2) and the transmembrane and cytoplasmicdomains of E-cadherin. All studies shown were also replicated using ananalogous cell line that expresses a mutant cadherin construct (T151)under the control of tet repressor. Mutant cadherin was expressed at~10% of the endogenous E-cadherin level and had no apparent effecton tight junction function or on distributions of adherens junction,tight junction, or desmosomal marker proteins in establishedMadin-Darby canine kidney cell monolayers. However, GP2-Cad1accelerated the disassembly of epithelial junctional complexes anddelayed their reassembly in calcium switch experiments. Inducingexpression of GP2-Cad1 to levels approximately threefold greater thanendogenous E-cadherin expression levels in control cells resulted in adecrease in endogenous E-cadherin levels. This was due in part toincreased protein turnover, indicating a cellular mechanism for sensingand controlling E-cadherin levels. Cadherin association with cateninsis necessary for strong cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion. In cellsexpressing low levels of GP2-Cad1, protein levels and stoichiometry ofthe endogenous cadherin-catenin complex were unaffected. Thus effectsof GP2-Cad1 on epithelial junctional complex assembly and stabilitywere not due to competition with endogenous E-cadherin for cateninbinding. Rather, we suggest that GP2-Cad1 interferes with the packingof endogenous cadherin-catenin complexes into higher-order structuresin junctional complexes that results in junction destabilization.     

Novel insights into cadherin processing by subtilisin-like convertases

Proprotein convertases (PCs) are known to activate many important molecules and their overexpression plays a significant role in tumor progression. Only little is known about the involvement of PCs in the processing of cadherin adhesion molecules, which are potent tumor suppressors. Here we show in a baculovirus overexpression system that the desmosomal cadherins Dsg1 and Dsg3 are substrates for the PC furin. Accordingly, inhibition of PCs in differentiating mouse keratinocytes by alpha 1-anti-trypsin Portland (alpha 1-PDX) negatively interfered with pro-epithelial (proE)-cadherin processing, but unexpectedly also resulted in a dramatic reduction of E-cadherin, Dsg1 and Dsg3 protein and Dsg1 mRNA. Because loss of intercellular adhesion is a rate-limiting step in the transition from benign to malignant tumors, these results have significant implications for the use of PC inhibitors as possible therapeutic tools.     

Cell surface localization and tissue distribution of a hepatocyte cell-cell adhesion glycoprotein (cell-CAM 105)

We recently identified a 105,000-dalton plasma membrane glycoprotein, denoted cell-CAM 105 (CAM, cell adhesion molecule), that is involved in intercellular adhesion of reaggregating rat hepatocytes (Ocklind, C., and B. Obrink, 1982, J. Biol. Chem., 257:6788-6795). In this communication we used a monospecific rabbit antiserum against cell-CAM 105 to localize the antigen by indirect immunofluorescence on isolated rat cells and on frozen rat tissue sections. This antiserum stained the surface of freshly isolated hepatocytes. In liver sections, however, the fluorescence seemed to be located exclusively along the bile canaliculi. In addition, cell-CAM 105 showed a very specific tissue distribution. Thus a specific fluorescence was seen only in the epithelia of the stomach, the small intestine, the large intestine, the glandular epithelium of the parotid gland, and the tubules of the kidney. No specific fluorescence was found in variety of other tissues, including cartilage, interstitial connective tissue, smooth muscle, skeletal muscle, heart muscle, eye, brain, skin, the epithelia of oesophagus, bladder, uterin mucosa, thyroid follicles, prostate gland, or collecting ducts of the kidney. In the simple epithelia of the intestine and the kidney tubules the fluorescence was confined to the apical, luminal portion. Thus, both in these epithelia and in liver, cell-CAM 105 was confined to the apical, luminal portion. Thus, both in these epithelia and in liver, cell-CAM 105 was located where the typical junctional complexes between cells are found. These findings taken together with the fact that cell-CAM 105 is involved in intercellular adhesion between hepatocytes suggest with the fac that cell-CAM 105 is involved in intercellular adhesion between hepatocytes suggest that cell-CAM 105 is a member of the junctional complexes of hepatocytes and some simple epithelia.     

α-catenin,vinculin, and F-actin in strengthening E-cadherin cell–cell adhesions and mechanosensing

Classical cadherins play a crucial role in establishing intercellular adhesion, regulating cortical tension, and maintaining mechanical coupling between cells. The mechanosensitive regulation of intercellular adhesion strengthening depends on the recruitment of adhesion complexes at adhesion sites and their anchoring to the actin cytoskeleton. Thus, the molecular mechanisms coupling cadherin-associated complexes to the actin cytoskeleton are actively being studied, with a particular focus on α-catenin and vinculin. We have recently addressed the role of these proteins by analyzing the consequences of their depletion and the expression of α-catenin mutants in the formation and strengthening of cadherin-mediated adhesions. We have used the dual pipette assay to measure the forces required to separate cell doublets formed in suspension. In this commentary, we briefly summarize the current knowledge on the role of α-catenin and vinculin in cadherin-actin cytoskeletal interactions. These data shed light on the tension-dependent contribution of α-catenin and vinculin in a mechanoresponsive complex that promotes the connection between cadherin and the actin cytoskeleton and their requirement in the development of adhesion strengthening.     

Presenilin-1 forms complexes with the cadherin/catenin cell-cell adhesion system and is recruited to intercellular and synaptic contacts

In MDCK cells, presenilin-1 (PS1) accumulates at intercellular contacts where it colocalizes with components of the cadherin-based adherens junctions. PS1 fragments form complexes with E-cadherin, beta-catenin, and alpha-catenin, all components of adherens junctions. In confluent MDCK cells, PS1 forms complexes with cell surface E-cadherin; disruption of Ca(2+)-dependent cell-cell contacts reduces surface PS1 and the levels of PS1-E-cadherin complexes. PS1 overexpression in human kidney cells enhances cell-cell adhesion. Together, these data show that PS1 incorporates into the cadherin/catenin adhesion system and regulates cell-cell adhesion. PS1 concentrates at intercellular contacts in epithelial tissue; in brain, it forms complexes with both E- and N-cadherin and concentrates at synaptic adhesions. That PS1 is a constituent of the cadherin/catenin complex makes that complex a potential target for PS1 FAD mutations.     

Force Measurement Tools to Explore Cadherin Mechanotransduction

Abstract

Cell–cell adhesions serve to mechanically couple cells, allowing for long-range transmission of forces across cells in development, disease, and homeostasis. Recent work has shown that such contacts also play a role in transducing mechanical cues into a wide variety of cellular behaviors important to tissue function. As such, understanding the mechanical regulation of cells through their adhesion molecules has become a point of intense focus. This review will highlight the existing and emerging technologies and models that allow for exploration of cadherin-based adhesions as sites of mechanotransduction.     

Chromosomal assignments of the genes for neuroendocrine convertase PC1 (NEC1) to human 5q15-21, neuroendocrine convertase PC2 (NEC2) to human 20p11.1-11.2, and furin (mouse 7[D1-E2] region).

The chromosomal localization of the genes coding for the pro-protein and pro-hormone convertases PC1, PC2, and Furin has been achieved by in situ hybridization. The genes for PC1 and PC2 were located on human chromosomes 5q15-21 and 20p11.1-11.2, respectively. The gene for Furin was assigned to the mouse chromosome 7D1-7E2 region. These data complete the chromosomal localization of these three convertases in both human and mouse. The results confirm the regional correspondence of the human chromosomes 15 and mouse chromosomes 7, as well as between human chromosome 20 and mouse chromosome 2. Furthermore, the identification of the NEC1 locus on human chromosome 5 and mouse chromosome 13 suggests a conservation of synthenic regions between these regions of the human and mouse genomes.     

The modulation of cell adhesion molecule expression and intercellular junction formation in the developing avian inner ear

The cells that constitute the membranous labyrinth in the vertebrate inner ear are all derived from a single embryonic source, namely, the otocyst. The mature inner ear epithelia contain different regions with highly differentiated cells, displaying a highly specialized cytoarchitecture. The present study was designed to determine the presence of adherens-type intercellular junctions in this tissue and study the expression of cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) associated with these junctions, namely, A-CAM and L-CAM, in the developing avian inner ear epithelia. The results presented here show that throughout the early otocyst, A-CAM is coexpressed with L-CAM. The formation of asymmetries between sensory and nonsensory areas in the epithelium is accompanied by the modulation of CAMs expression and the assembly of intercellular junctional complexes. A-CAM and L-CAM display reciprocal expression patterns, the former being expressed mostly in the mosaic sensory epithelium, while L-CAM becomes conspicuous in the nonsensory areas but its expression in the sensory region is markedly reduced. Adherens-type junctions and numerous desmosomes are found in the junctional complexes of early otocyst cells. The former persist to maturity of the various inner ear epithelia, whereas desmosomes disappear from junctional complexes of hair cells but remain in the intercellular junctional complexes of all other cell types in the membranous labyrinth. Thus, adherens type intercellular junctions comprise the only defined cytoskeleton-bound junction in mature hair cells. A-CAM-positive cells are also found in the region of the acoustic ganglion in early developmental stages but not in the mature neural elements.     

The cellular basis of cell sorting kinetics

Cell sorting is a dynamical cooperative phenomenon that is fundamental for tissue morphogenesis and tissue homeostasis. According to Steinberg's differential adhesion hypothesis, the structure of sorted cell aggregates is determined by physical characteristics of the respective tissues, the tissue surface tensions. Steinberg postulated that tissue surface tensions result from quantitative differences in intercellular adhesion. Several experiments in cell cultures as well as in developing organisms support this hypothesis.The question of how tissue surface tension might result from differential adhesion was addressed in some theoretical models. These models describe the cellular interdependence structure once the temporal evolution has stabilized. In general, these models are capable of reproducing sorted patterns. However, the model dynamics at the cellular scale are defined implicitly and are not well-justified. The precise mechanism describing how differential adhesion generates the observed sorting kinetics at the tissue level is still unclear.It is necessary to formulate the concepts of cell level kinetics explicitly. Only then it is possible to understand the temporal development at the cellular and tissue scales. Here we argue that individual cell mobility is reduced the more the cells stick to their neighbors. We translate this assumption into a precise mathematical model which belongs to the class of stochastic interacting particle systems. Analyzing this model, we are able to predict the emergent sorting behavior at the population level. We describe qualitatively the geometry of cell segregation depending on the intercellular adhesion parameters. Furthermore, we derive a functional relationship between intercellular adhesion and surface tension and highlight the role of cell mobility in the process of sorting. We show that the interaction between the cells and the boundary of a confining vessel has a major impact on the sorting geometry.     

Cell adhesion: More than just glue (Review)

The ability of cells to interact with each other and their surroundings in a co-ordinated manner depends on multiple adhesive interactions between neighbouring cells and their extracellular environment. These adhesive interactions are mediated by a family of cell surface proteins, termed cell adhesion molecules. Fortunately these adhesion molecules fall into distinct families with adhesive interactions varying in strength from strong binding involved in the maintenance of tissue architecture to more transient, less avid, dynamic interactions observed in leukocyte biology. Adhesion molecules are extremely versatile cell surface receptors which not only stick cells together but provide biochemical and physical signals that regulate a range of diverse functions, such as cell proliferation, gene expression, differentiation, apoptosis and migration. In addition, like many other cell surface molecules, they have been usurped as portals of entry for pathogens, including prions. How the mechanical and chemical messages generated from adhesion molecules are integrated with other signalling pathways (such as receptor tyrosine kinases and phosphatases) and the role that aberrant cell adhesion plays in developmental defects and disease pathology are currently very active areas of research. This review focuses on the biochemical features that define whether a cell surface molecule can act as an adhesion molecule, and discusses five specific examples of how cell adhesion molecules function as more than just 'sticky’ receptors. The discussion is confined to the signalling events mediated by members of the integrin, cadherin and immunoglobulin gene superfamilies. It is suggested that, by controlling the membrane organization of signalling receptors, by imposing spatial organization, and by regulating the local concentration of cytosolic adapter proteins, intercellular and cell-matrix adhesion is more than just glue holding cells together. Rather dynamic ‘conversations’ and the formation of multi-protein complexes between adhesion molecules, growth factor receptors and matrix macromolecules can now provide a molecular explanation for the long-observed but poorly understood requirement for a number of seemingly distinct cell surface molecules to be engaged for efficient cell function to occur.     

α-Catenin and Vinculin Cooperate to Promote High E-cadherin-based Adhesion Strength

Maintaining cell cohesiveness within tissues requires that intercellular adhesions develop sufficient strength to support traction forces applied by myosin motors and by neighboring cells. Cadherins are transmembrane receptors that mediate intercellular adhesion. The cadherin cytoplasmic domain recruits several partners, including catenins and vinculin, at sites of cell-cell adhesion. Our study used force measurements to address the role of αE-catenin and vinculin in the regulation of the strength of E-cadherin-based adhesion. αE-catenin-deficient cells display only weak aggregation and fail to strengthen intercellular adhesion over time, a process rescued by the expression of αE-catenin or chimeric E-cadherin·αE-catenins, including a chimera lacking the αE-catenin dimerization domain. Interestingly, an αE-catenin mutant lacking the modulation and actin-binding domains restores cadherin-dependent cell-cell contacts but cannot strengthen intercellular adhesion. The expression of αE-catenin mutated in its vinculin-binding site is defective in its ability to rescue cadherin-based adhesion strength in cells lacking αE-catenin. Vinculin depletion or the overexpression of the αE-catenin modulation domain strongly decreases E-cadherin-mediated adhesion strength. This supports the notion that both molecules are required for intercellular contact maturation. Furthermore, stretching of cell doublets increases vinculin recruitment and α18 anti-αE-catenin conformational epitope immunostaining at cell-cell contacts. Taken together, our results indicate that αE-catenin and vinculin cooperatively support intercellular adhesion strengthening, probably via a mechanoresponsive link between the E-cadherin·β-catenin complexes and the underlying actin cytoskeleton.     

Cell adhesion: more than just glue (review)

The ability of cells to interact with each other and their surroundings in a co-ordinated manner depends on multiple adhesive interactions between neighbouring cells and their extracellular environment. These adhesive interactions are mediated by a family of cell surface proteins, termed cell adhesion molecules. Fortunately these adhesion molecules fall into distinct families with adhesive interactions varying in strength from strong binding involved in the maintenance of tissue architecture to more transient, less avid, dynamic interactions observed in leukocyte biology. Adhesion molecules are extremely versatile cell surface receptors which not only stick cells together but provide biochemical and physical signals that regulate a range of diverse functions, such as cell proliferation, gene expression, differentiation, apoptosis and migration. In addition, like many other cell surface molecules, they have been usurped as portals of entry for pathogens, including prions. How the mechanical and chemical messages generated from adhesion molecules are integrated with other signalling pathways (such as receptor tyrosine kinases and phosphatases) and the role that aberrant cell adhesion plays in developmental defects and disease pathology are currently very active areas of research. This review focuses on the biochemical features that define whether a cell surface molecule can act as an adhesion molecule, and discusses five specific examples of how cell adhesion molecules function as more than just 'sticky' receptors. The discussion is confined to the signalling events mediated by members of the integrin, cadherin and immunoglobulin gene superfamilies. It is suggested that, by controlling the membrane organization of signalling receptors, by imposing spatial organization, and by regulating the local concentration of cytosolic adapter proteins, intercellular and cell-matrix adhesion is more than just glue holding cells together. Rather dynamic 'conversations' and the formation of multi-protein complexes between adhesion molecules, growth factor receptors and matrix macromolecules can now provide a molecular explanation for the long-observed but poorly understood requirement for a number of seemingly distinct cell surface molecules to be engaged for efficient cell function to occur.