Evaluation of results of linac-based radiosurgery for brain metastases from primary lung cancer

Aim

The purpose of our review was to evaluate results of radiosurgery for patients with brain metastases from lung cancer.

Background

Lung cancer is the leading cause of death from cancer and the most common source of brain metastases. Radiosurgery allows the precise focal delivery of a high single radiation dose to brain metastases and results in high rates of local control.

Materials and methods

83 patients were treated between 2006 and 2008. We evaluated local control and outcome after radiosurgery and identified prognostic factors.

Results

Median survival in the whole group was 7.8 months from radiosurgery and 11 months from diagnosis. Median survival in classes I, II and III was 13.2, 8.2 and 2.2 months. For 94% of patients symptoms improved or stabilised at the first follow-up visit and this status did not change during 7.1 months. According to the univariate analysis, factors associated with improved survival included: RPA class 1 compared with RPA 2 and 3, RPA class 2 compared with RPA 3, KPS > 70, control of the primary disease, radiosurgery performed more than once, level of haemoglobin >7 mmol/1, absence of extracranial metastases, volume of the biggest lesion <11 cm³. The multivariate analysis confirmed a significant influence on survival for the following factors: RPA class 1 as compared with RPA 3, KPS > 70, absence of extracranial metastases, multiplicity of radiosurgery.

Conclusions

Stereotactic radiosurgery is a safe and effective treatment. It proved to be effective and safe in older patients. Selection of patients who are likely to benefit most should be based on prognostic factors. KPS proved to be the most important prognostic factor. In the RPA III group (patients with KPS < 70) survival time was similar to that achieved after symptomatic medical management.     

Local control of 1–5 fraction radiotherapy regimens for spinal metastases: an analysis of the impacts of biologically effective dose and primary histology

BackgroundThis analysis evaluates the impacts of biologically effective dose (BED) and histology on local control (LC) of spinal metastases treated with highly conformal radiotherapy to moderately-escalated doses.Materials and methodsPatients were treated at two institutions from 2010–2020. Treatments with less than 5 Gy per fraction or 8 Gy in 1 fraction were excluded. The dataset was divided into three RPA classes predictive of survival (1). The primary endpoint was LC.Results223 patients with 248 treatments met inclusion criteria. Patients had a median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS ) of 80, and common histologies included breast (29.4%), non-small cell lung cancer (15.7%), and prostate (13.3%). A median 24 Gy was delivered in 3 fractions (BED: 38.4 Gy) to a median planning target volume (PTV) of 37.3 cc. 2-year LC was 75.7%, and 2-year OS was 42.1%. Increased BED was predictive of improved LC for primary prostate cancer (HR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74–0.99). Patients with favorable survival (RPA class 1) had improved LC with BED ≥ 40 Gy (p = 0.05), unlike the intermediate and poor survival groups. No grade 3–5 toxicities were reported.ConclusionsModerately-escalated treatments were efficacious and well-tolerated. BED ≥ 40 Gy may improve LC, particularly for prostate cancer and patients with favorable survival.     

CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiosurgery in brain metastases: A report from Latin America with literature review

Background and aim

Stereotactic radiosurgery is increasingly being employed for the treatment of brain metastases, both as an adjuvant to surgical resection, and also as a primary treatment modality. The aim of this study is to evaluate overall survival and local control in patients with brain metastases treated with CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiosurgery (CKRS), due to the lack of evidence reported in Latin America.

Brain metastases from stomach cancer – The role of different treatment modalities and efficacy of palliative radiotherapy

Aim

To evaluate different treatment modalities, sequences, and prognostic factors in patients with brain metastases from stomach cancer.

Background

Brain metastases from gastric cancer are rare and late manifestation of the disease, occurring in less than 1% of gastric cancer patients. The prognosis is poor and median overall survival is 1.3–2.4 months. The standard treatment scheme has not yet been described. Most studies present small sample sizes. The choice of treatment scheme is individually based on performance status, number, location and size of metastases, the status of primary tumor and the presence of other metastases.

Materials and methods

Sixteen patients diagnosed with brain metastases from gastric cancer in Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch.Patients, mostly men (69%) aged 51–75 years, (median 68.5 years). Thirteen (81.25%) had treatment of primary tumor before diagnosis of brain metastases. Primary metastatic gastric cancer was diagnosed in 6 patients (37.5%), in 3 cases (18.75%) brain was the site of those metastases. Treatment schemes were individually based.

Results

We identified prognostic factors influencing OS: performance status, number of brain metastases, type of treatment. Median OS was 2.8 months. Median time to brain metastases was 12.3 months and it was shorter in patients with pretreatment metastases to other organs. Patients treated with combined treatment had median survival of 12.3 months.

Conclusions

Aggressive treatment schemes are needed to improve the outcome. Prognostic factors such as performance status, number of metastases, dissemination to other organs are helpful in considering the best treatment options.     

Helical tomotherapy for asymptomatic chemotherapy-refractory or -unfit multiple (3 or more) metastases

BackgroundDespite chemotherapy innovations, prognosis of patients with chemotherapy-refractory or -unfit multiple metastases (CRMM/CUMM) remains poor. In this prospective study, the efficacy and toxicity of helical tomotherapy for CRMM/CUMM were evaluated.Materials and methodsBetween 2014 and 2020, asymptomatic patients with CRMM/CUMM with ≥ 3 lesions and no prior radiotherapy of the targets were enrolled. Patients who had intolerable toxicities to chemotherapy and those who refused chemotherapy were included in the CRMM and CUMM groups, respectively. Prostate cancer patients and patients with metastases mainly localized in the liver, lung, or brain were excluded. By helical tomotherapy, up to 10 lesions per patient were irradiated in order of volume. The standard dose was 50–60 Gy in 25–30 fractions.ResultsForty-five patients (median age, 63 years; 35 CRMM/10 CUMM) were enrolled. Primary tumors included lung, gynecological, and gastrointestinal cancers. The most frequently treated targets were lymph node metastases, followed by peritoneal/pleural disseminations and bone tumors. The 1-year survival rate was 51% (median, 12.5 months). In the 35 patients with CRMM, the median survival time was 12.5 months, and the median pre-radiation chemotherapy period was 8.8 months (p > 0.05). The 6-month target control rate was 78%. Acute adverse events (grade ≥ 2) occurred in 33 patients: hematologic toxicities in 23, dermatitis in 6, and others in 8. Late grade ≥ 2 toxicities occurred in 6 patients: pneumonitis in 4 and gastric hemorrhage in 2.ConclusionTomotherapy for CRMM/CUMM resulted in median survival times > 1 year. This treatment should be investigated further in larger prospective studies.     

Positive Lymph Node Metastasis Has a Marked Impact on the Long-Term Survival of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Extrahepatic Metastasis

Background

The prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with extrahepatic metastasis is extremely poor. However, what is the main risk factor for survival remains unclear for these patients. We aimed to find out the relative frequency, incidence and locations of extrahepatic metastases and the risk factors of long-term survival of the patients.

Methods

132 HCC patients with extrahepatic metastasis diagnosed by ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and conventional workup were enrolled into this study. The incidence and locations of extrahepatic metastases were summarized, and the related risk factors of overall survival were analyzed.

Results

The most frequent extrahepatic metastatic sites were lymph nodes in 72 (54.5%), bone in 33 (25.0%) and lung in 28 (21.2%) patients. On univariate analysis, prothrombin time, Child-Pugh grade, portal/hepatic vein invasion and lymph node metastasis were independent risk factors of overall survival. On multivariate analysis, lymph node metastasis was the only independent risk factor of overall survival. The cumulative survival rates at 1- and 3-years after diagnosis of extrahepatic metastasis of HCC were 34.4% and 9.3%, respectively. The median survival time was 7 months (range 1 ∼38 months). The median survival time for patients with or without lymph node metastasis were 5 months (range 1∼38 months) and 12 months (range 1∼30 months), respectively (P = 0.036).

Conclusions

This study showed lymph nodes to be the most frequent site of extrahepatic metastases for primary HCC. Lymph node metastasis was the main risk factor of overall survival in patients with HCC with extrahepatic metastasis.     

Increased CYFRA 21-1, CEA and NSE are Prognostic of Poor Outcome for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Lung: A Nomogram and Recursive Partitioning Risk Stratification Analysis

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to: (1) assess the prognostic significance of serum tumor markers in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma in lung (LA-SCCL); (2) generate a nomogram to predict the overall survival (OS) and (3) identify a prognostic stratification to assist the therapeutic decision-making. METHODS: LA-SCCL patients receiving definitive radiotherapy and baseline tumor marker measurement were eligible for this retrospective study. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine independent factors associated with various survival indexes and a nomogram was created to estimate the 5-year OS probability for individual patient. The identified prognostic factors were recruited into a recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) for OS to stratify patients with distinct outcome. RESULTS: A total of 224 patients were eligible for analysis. Increased cytokeratin-19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) was independently associated with inferior OS, progression free survival (PFS) and a borderline decreased local-regional progression free survival (LRPFS). Elevated carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) served as an unfavorable determinant for OS and increased neuron-specific enolase (NSE) was predictive of poor distant metastasis free survival (DMFS). A nomogram integrating KPS, TNM stage, CEA and CYFRA 21-1 was created, resulting in a c-index of 0.62. RPA identified 4 prognostic classifications, with median OS of 27.6, 19.9, 17.3 and 10.9?months for low, intermediate, high and very-high risk groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline tumor marker panel including CYFRA 21-1, CEA and NSE can be prognostic of outcome for LA-SCCL receiving definitive radiotherapy. The RPA identified four prognostic subgroups, which could assist personalized therapy and clinical trial design in LA-SCCL.     

Retrospective Analysis of 234 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients with Distant Metastasis at Initial Diagnosis: Therapeutic Approaches and Prognostic Factors

Purpose

The purpose of this retrospective study was to identify the independent prognostic factors and optimize the treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients with distant metastasis at initial diagnosis.

Methods

A total of 234 patients referred between January 2001 and December 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. Among the 234 patients, 94 patients received chemotherapy alone (CT), and 140 patients received chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Clinical features, laboratory parameters and treatment modality were examined with univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

The median overall survival (OS) time was 22 months (range, 2-125 months), and the 1-year, 2-year, 3-year overall survival rates were 82.2%, 51.3% and 34.1%. The overall response and disease control rates of metastatic lesions after chemotherapy were 56.0% and 89.8%. The factors associated with poor response were karnofsky performance score (KPS) <80, liver metastasis, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)>245 IU/L, and number of chemotherapy cycles <4. The 3-year OS of patients receiving CRT was higher than those receiving CT alone (48.2% vs. 12.4%, p<0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that significantly improved survival was also achieved by radiotherapy of the primary tumor in patients who achieved complete remission (CR)/partial remission (PR) or stable disease (SD) of metastatic lesions after chemotherapy. Significant independent prognostic factors of OS were KPS, liver metastasis, levels of LDH, and multiple metastases. Treatment modality, response to chemotherapy and chemotherapy cycles were also associated with OS.

Conclusion

A combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy seems to have survival benefits for selected patients with distant metastases at initial diagnosis. Clinical and laboratory characteristics can help to guide treatment selection. Prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm the result.     

Risk Factors for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) Predict Long-Term Treatment with Docetaxel

Purpose

For patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostatic cancer (mCRPC), docetaxel plus prednisone leads to superior survival and a higher response rate compared with mitoxantrone plus prednisone. We analyzed the efficacy of long-term treatment with ≥10 cycles of docetaxel, and validated the risk group classification in predicting overall survival (OS) in Japanese patients with mCRPC.

Patients and Methods

Fifty-two patients with mCRPC were administered 55 mg/m² docetaxel and 8 mg dexamethasone, every 3 or 4 weeks, simultaneously with hormonal therapy and daily oral dexamethasone. They were divided into two groups, short-term (9 or fewer cycles) and long-term (10 or more cycles). Four risk factors including the presence of anemia, bone metastases, significant pain and visceral metastases were utilized for the risk group classification.

Results

Fourteen patients (27%) had an elevation of PSA in spite of docetaxel treatment, while 23 patients (44%) had a decline in PSA level, including 9 patients (17%) whose PSA level declined by ≥50%. The median duration of OS after the initiation of this therapy was 11.2 months in the short-term group and 28.5 months in the long-term group. The good risk group showed a significant difference in OS compared with the intermediate and poor risk groups (P<0.001). The median number of cycles of treatment was 14, 4 and 3 for each risk group, respectively (p<0.01).

Conclusions

The present study indicated that ≥10 cycles of this docetaxel therapy can significantly prolong survival in Japanese men with CRPC. This risk group classification for men with mCRPC at the initiation of this chemotherapy is useful.     

A Laboratory Prognostic Index Model for Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose

We aimed to establish a laboratory prognostic index (LPI) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients based on hematologic and biochemical parameters and to analyze the predictive value of LPI on NSCLC survival.

Patients and Methods

The study retrospectively reviewed 462 patients with advanced NSCLC diagnosed between 2000 and 2010 in a single institution. We developed an LPI that included serum levels of white blood cells (WBC), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), albumin, calcium, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP), based on the results of a Cox regression analysis. The patients were classified into 3 LPI groups as follows: LPI 0: normal; LPI 1: one abnormal laboratory finding; and LPI 2: at least 2 abnormal laboratory findings.

Results

The median follow up period was 44 months; the median overall survival (OS) and median progression-free survival (PFS) were 11 and 6 months, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed that the following could be used as independent prognostic factors: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score (ECOG PS) ≥2, a high LDH level, serum albumin <3 g/dL, serum calcium>10.5 g/dL, number of metastases>2, presence of liver metastases, malignant pleural effusion, or receiving chemotherapy ≥4 cycles. The 1-year OS rates according to LPI 0, LPI 1, and LPI 2 were 54%, 34%, and 17% (p<0.001), respectively and 6-month PFS rates were 44%, 27%, and 15% (p<0.001), respectively. The LPI was a significant predictor for OS (Hazard Ratio (HR): 1.41; 1.05–1.88, p<0.001) and PFS (HR: 1.48; 1.14–1.93, p<0.001).

Conclusion

An LPI is an inexpensive, easily accessible and independent prognostic index for advanced NSCLC and may be helpful in making individualized treatment plans and predicting survival rates when combined with clinical parameters.     

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases: Clinical outcomes and literature review

Background and aimThe role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the management of liver metastasis is increasing, using ablative doses with the goal of local control and ultimately improving survival. The aim of this study is to evaluate our initial results regarding local control, overall survival and toxicity in patients with liver metastases treated with this technique, due to the lack of evidence reported in Latin America.Materials/methodsWe performed a retrospective chart review from November 2012 to June 2018 of 24 patients with 32 liver metastases. Kaplan–Meier curves were constructed for local control and overall survival. Clinical and prognostic factors were further analyzed by independent analysis. Median follow-up period was 22 months (range, 1–65 months).ResultsMedian age was 62 years (range, 40–84 years). Colorectal carcinoma was the most common primary cancer. Overall 1-year and 2-years local control rates were 82% (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 70–98%) and 76.2% (95% CI, 45–90%), respectively. Median overall survival rate was 35 months (95%, CI 20.5–48 months). Overall 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 85.83% (95% CI, 64–99%) and 68% (95% CI, 45–84%), respectively. No acute or late grade 3 or 4 toxicity was observed during the follow-up period.ConclusionsSBRT achieves excellent local control and overall survival rates with low toxicity in patients with liver metastases. Based on our literature review, our results are consistent with larger reports. Further randomized trials are required to compare with other local therapies.     

Survival after intratumoral interleukin-2 treatment of 72 melanoma patients and response upon the first chemotherapy during follow-up

Systemic high-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) treatment achieves long-term survival in a subset of advanced patients with melanoma. As we reported previously, intratumoral IL-2 induced complete local responses in more than 60% of melanoma patients. This study aimed to analyze the long-term outcome of 72 patients treated in two prior trials. Melanoma patients (49 stage III, 23 stage IV) with injectable metastases received intratumoral IL-2 injections thrice weekly at individually escalated doses (median duration, 6.5 weeks; median total IL-2 dose, 72 MIU; median number of injected metastases, 10). The observed 2-year overall survival rates were 95.5% for stage III patients with cutaneous metastases only (stage IIIB), 72% for those with combined cutaneous and lymph node involvement (stage IIIC), 66.7% for stage IV patients with disease limited to distant soft-tissue metastases (stage IV M1a), and 9.1% for those with visceral metastases (stage IV M1b and stage IV M1c). Thirty patients who reported recurrence of unresectable distant metastases subsequently received chemotherapy in the further course of disease and showed an overall response rate of 36.7% (16.7% complete responses, 20% partial responses). A high total dose of IL-2 and a dacarbazine/temozolomide-based chemotherapy regimen were variables correlated with a clinical response. In conclusion, patients with cutaneous metastasis without lymph node involvement in stage III and with soft-tissue metastasis without visceral involvement in stage IV showed unexpected favorable survival rates after intratumoral treatment with IL-2. Furthermore, the intratumoral IL-2 treatment seemed to be associated with increased complete and partial responses in subsequent chemotherapies.     

Survival and prognostic factors for patients with melanoma brain metastases in the era of modern systemic therapy

Historically, the prognosis of patients with melanoma brain metastases is poor, with median overall survival (OS) of 4‐6 months. Little is known of OS in the era of modern systemic therapies and local therapy with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or surgery. Patients diagnosed with melanoma brain metastases at Melanoma Institute Australia from January 2011 to December 2014 were included. OS and prognostic factors were analysed using Cox regression and Kaplan‐Meier survival analyses.355 patients were included. The median OS was 7.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.0‐8.1). Median OS differed by treatment modality: systemic therapy and SRS and/or surgery 14.9 months (95% CI 10.7‐19.0), SRS and/or surgery with or without whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) 6.4 months (95% CI 5.4‐7.5), systemic therapy 5.4 months (95% CI 3.1‐7.7), systemic therapy and WBRT 5.2 months (95% CI 4.1‐6.4), WBRT 4.4 months (95% CI 2.4‐6.3), and best supportive care 1.8 months (95% CI 1.2‐2.3). OS for patients with melanoma brain metastases appears improved in the modern era, particularly for patients who are candidates for systemic therapy with SRS and/or surgery.     

Long-term survival results after treatment for oligometastatic brain disease

AimThe aim of this study was to characterize the survival results of patients with up to four brain metastases after intense local therapy (primary surgery or stereotactic radiotherapy) if extracranial metastases were absent or limited to one site, e.g. the lungs.BackgroundOligometastatic disease has repeatedly been reported to convey a favorable prognosis.Material and methodsThis retrospective study included 198 German and Norwegian patients treated with individualized approaches, always including brain radiotherapy. Information about age, extracranial spread, number of brain metastases, performance status and other variables was collected. Uni- and multivariate tests were performed.ResultsMedian survival was 16.5 months (single brain metastasis) and 9.8 months (2–4, comparable survival for 2, 3 and 4), respectively (p = 0.001). After 5 years, 15 and 2% of the patients were still alive. In patients alive after 2 years, added median survival was 23 months and the probability of being alive 5 years after treatment was 26%. In multivariate analysis, extracranial metastases were not significantly associated with survival, while primary tumor control was.ConclusionLong-term survival beyond 5 years is possible in a minority of patients with oligometastatic brain disease, in particular those with a single brain metastasis. The presence of extracranial metastases to one site should not be regarded a barrier towards maximum brain-directed therapy.     

Clinical Impact of Pancreatic Metastases from Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis

Pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma are uncommon and their prognostic significance is not well defined. In this analysis we evaluated the outcome of patients with pancreatic metastases treated with either targeted therapies or local treatment to the pancreas. Patients with pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma treated between 1993 and 2014 were identified from 11 European centers. Clinical records were retrospectively reviewed. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to evaluate progression-free survival and overall survival. Cox’s proportional hazard models were used for survival analysis. In total, 276 PM patients were evaluated, including 77 (28%) patients treated by either surgery or radiotherapy to the pancreas, and 256 (93%) who received systemic therapy. Median time from nephrectomy to diagnosis of pancreatic metastases was 91 months (IQR 54–142). Disease control rate after first-line TTs was 84%, with a median progression-free survival of 12 months (95% CI 10–14). Median overall survival was 73 months (95% CI 61–86) with a 5-year OS of 58%. Median OS of patients treated with local treatment was 106 months (95% CI 78–204) with a 5-year overall survival of 75%. On multivariable analysis, nephrectomy (HR 5.31; 95%CI 2.36–11.92; p<0.0001), Memorial Sloan Kettering/International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium prognostic score (HR 1.45, 95% CI 0.94–2.23 for intermediate vs good vs risk; HR 2.76 95%, CI 1.43–5.35 for poor vs good risk p = 0.0099) and pancreatic local treatment (HR 0.48; 95%CI 0.30–0.78 p = 0.0029) were associated with overall survival. Difference in median OS between patients with PM and that reported in a matched-control group of mRCC patients with extrapancreatic metastases was statistically significant (p < .0001). Pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma usually occur years after nephrectomy, are associated with an indolent behavior and a prolonged survival. Targeted therapies and locoregional approaches are active and achieve high disease control rate.     

Conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT) for non-metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer: costly and sophisticated but ineffective treatment?

PurposePatients with diagnosis of hormone-refractory prostate cancers (HRPC) present a very heterogeneous population, and therefore it has been proposed to sub-categorize them into two subgroups depending on presence or absence of distant metastases. While the former subgroup has been typically treated with palliative intention, for the latter apparently there is no standard approach. The role of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for this subgroup has not been well documented in the literature. Thus, the purpose of this work is to analyze the results of treatment of non-metastatic androgen-refractory prostate cancer (ARPC) with 3D-CRT and to investigate the potential prognostic factors which influenced the results.Material and MethodsOf 424 patients with diagnosis of localized and locally advanced prostate cancer who were treated between 1999 and 2004 in our centre, forty-three (n=43) patients were classified as non-metastatic ARPC. Distant metastases were excluded by negative bone scan, negative chest X-ray and negative pelvic CT for lymph node metastases. The median pre-hormone therapy PSA (pre-HT PSA) level for this group was 24 ng/ml (range 1 to 120) and 5.7 ng/ml (range 0.06 to 27) at the beginning of radiotherapy (pre-RT PSA). Clinical T stage distribution, defined according to the 2002 AJCC, was as follows: T1c = 12, T2 = 23, and T3 = 8 patients, respectively. Of 44 patients, 39 had a Gleason score of 2-7 and 4 had a Gleason score of 8–10. All patients with diagnosis of non-metastatic ARPC were treated with 3D-CRT with the daily fraction dose of 2 Gy to a median total dose of 68 Gy (range from 60 to 74 Gy). The median duration of androgen ablation therapy before RT was 26 months (range from 7 to 96). The median time of follow-up after 3D-CRT was 27 months (range from 13 to 62) and from the beginning of androgen ablation was 53 months (range from 20 to 158). The following prognostic factors were evaluated in univariate and multivariate analysis: age, pre-HT PSA, pre-RT PSA, Gleason score, total dose, PSA doubling time (PSADT< 6 months vs. PSADT > 6 months).ResultsThe 5-year actuarial overall survival was 82% and 5-year clinical relapse free-survival rate was 49%. During the follow-up 14 patients developed disease progression (locoregional and/or distant and/or biochemical) and two patients died of prostate cancer. The univariate analysis indicated that pre-HT PSA > 20 ng/ml, pre-RT PSA > 4ng/ml, and the high-risk group defined according to NCCN criteria (PSA >20 ng/ml and Gleason score >7) were statistically significant factors for the risk of disease progression.ConclusionsThree-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for patients with non-metastatic ARPC is a valuable method of treatment for the subgroup of patients with pre-HT PSA<20 ng/ml and Gleason score < 8. For patients classified as the high-risk group according to NCCN criteria 3D-CRT seems to be an ineffective treatment due to the observed high incidence of distant failure, and should be viewed as costly and sophisticated yet ineffective intervention. For this subgroup a systemic modality of treatment such as chemotherapy or biological manipulation should be considered.     

Comparison of efficacy of different route of administration of chemotherapy on unresectable, advanced gastric cancer

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of two neoadjuvant chemotherapies (FLEEOX and XELOX) with different routes of administration for unresectable gastric cancer. METHODS: A total of 85 patients with unresectable gastric cancer hospitalized from January 2007 to December 2009 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The FLEEOX group (48 patients) received the FLEEOX regimen(fluorouracil, leucovorin, epirubicin, epotoside, and oxaliplatin), which combined arterial with venous administration for one or two cycles, while the XELOX group (37 patients) received XELOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin) via venous administration for two to four cycles. The clinical response and overall survival of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: In the FLEEOX group, the clinical response rate (RR) of chemotherapy was 85.4% (41 of 48 patients) and the median survival time was 25 months. The 1-year and 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 85.4% and 45.8%, respectively. In the XELOX group, the clinical RR was 59.5% and the median survival time was 9 months, while the 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 35.2% and 8.3%, respectively. The clinical RR, the R0 resection rate, the median survival time, and the 1-year and 2-year DFS rates were significantly better (P <0.05) in the FLEEOX group than in the XELOX group. In addition, there were no significant differences in the rates of toxic and adverse reactions or post-operative complications between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with a preoperative diagnosis of unresectable gastric cancer, the efficacy of the FLEEOX regimen, which combines arterial with venous administration, was better than that of the XELOX regimen, using venous administration only. This combination of arterial and venous administration could be useful for improving the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer.     

Adjuvant Chemotherapy with Docetaxel,Cisplatin, and Continuous-Infusion 5-Fluorouracil for Gastric Cancer: A Phase II Study

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy with the docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (DCF) regimen in patients with gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer were enrolled in this study after undergoing radical resection. The patients received the following chemotherapy: docetaxel (60 mg/m²) on day 1, cisplatin (12 mg/m² per day) on days 1 to 5, and 5-FU (2500 mg/m²) continuous infusion for 120 hours, repeated every 3 weeks for six cycles. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: The median DFS was 17.0 months. The 1-year DFS was 72%, and the 2-year DFS was 37.5%. The median overall survival was 28.0 months. Using univariate analysis, the technique of lymph node dissection was a predictor for postoperative relapse. The median DFS was 15.0 months in the D1 group and 18.0 months in the D2 group (P = .043). The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (56.25%), diarrhea (9.38%), nausea (6.25%), and vomiting (6.25%); 12.5% of patients developed febrile neutropenia. There were no chemotherapy-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The modified DCF regimen is an effective adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer. Hematologic toxicity was frequent but manageable. This regimen merits further investigation.     

非小细胞肺癌脑转移瘤综合治疗的预后影响因素分析

目的:研究综合治疗的非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)脑转移瘤患者生存预后影响因素,为NSCLC脑转移瘤的治疗提供更多的参考依据。方法:收集83例诊断为NSCLC脑转移瘤的患者进行回顾性研究,随访后建立临床资料数据库,采用单因素分析及Cox回归模型分析不同因素对非小细胞肺癌脑转移瘤患者生存期的影响。结果:患者中位生存期为11个月,6月、12月、18月的生存率分别为79.0%、32.7%、19.4%。经单因素和多因素分析结果显示脑转移瘤的病理类型、原发灶控制情况、治疗方式、靶向治疗是NSCLC脑转移生存的独立影响预后因素。单发转移瘤中,手术联合全脑放疗(Whole brain radiotherapy,WBRT)与手术相比风险率(hazard rate,HR)为0.645(P>0.05),说明联合方式并没有在生存中获益。多发转移瘤中,手术与WBRT相结合与单纯手术对比HR=0.297(P<0.05),有统计学意义。结论:病理类型为非腺癌,原发灶未得到控制,治疗方式不当以及未应用靶向治疗是NSCLC脑转移瘤的独立危险因素。对于单发脑转移瘤患者的局部治疗,单独手术治疗可能具有更高的优势;对于多发脑转移瘤患者的局部治疗,手术与WBRT联合可能具有更多的生存获益。