The four human muscle regulatory helix-loop-helix proteins Myf3-Myf6 exhibit similar hetero-dimerization and DNA binding properties.

The muscle regulatory proteins Myf3, Myf4, Myf5, and Myf6 share a highly conserved DNA binding and dimerization domain consisting of a cluster of basic amino acids and a potential helix-loop-helix structure. Here we demonstrate that the four human muscle-specific HLH proteins have similar DNA binding and dimerization properties. The members of this family form protein complexes of comparable stability with the ubiquitously expressed HLH proteins E12, E2-2, and E2-5 and bind to the conserved DNA sequence CANNTG designated as E-box with similar efficiency in vitro. The binding affinities of the various complexes are greatly influenced by the variable internal and flanking nucleotides of the consensus motif. Combinations of Myf proteins with one another and with lyl-1, and HLH protein from human T cells, do not bind to DNA in vitro. Our results suggest that combinatorial associations of the various tissue-specific and more widely expressed HLH factors do not result in differential recognition of DNA sequences by Myf proteins.     

The E12 inhibitory domain prevents homodimer formation and facilitates selective heterodimerization with the MyoD family of gene regulatory factors.

Although the ubiquitous helix-loop-helix (HLH) protein E12 does not homodimerize efficiently, the myogenic factor MyoD forms an avid DNA-binding heterodimer with E12 through the conserved HLH dimerization domain. However, the mechanism which ensures this selective dimerization is not understood at present. In our functional studies of various amino acid changes in the E12 HLH domain, we found that a single substitution in E12 helix 1 can abolish the effect of the E12 inhibitory domain and results in the efficient DNA binding of the E12 homodimer. Competition experiments revealed that the inhibitory domain, in fact, blocks the dimerization of E12 rather than DNA binding. MyoD contains two glutamic residues in helix 2 that are required for efficient dimerization with E12. More importantly, these residues were not essential for dimerization with E12 mutants in which the dimerization inhibitory domain had been relaxed, or for dimerization with E47 which does not contain the inhibitory domain owing to the use of an alternative exon. The positions of these glutamic residues are conserved among the four myogenic factors. Thus, members of the MyoD family of gene regulatory proteins can overcome the E12 dimerization inhibitory domain through a mechanism involving, in part, the negatively charged amino acid residues in helix 2. This result describes a novel mechanism facilitating the selective formation of the MyoD(MRF)-E12 heterodimer that enhances dimerization specificity and may apply to other members of the E-protein family.     

extramacrochaetae, a negative regulator of sensory organ development in Drosophila, defines a new class of helix-loop-helix proteins.

The function of the extramacrochaetae (emc) gene is required to establish the normal spatial pattern of adult sensory organs in Drosophila. emc acts to suppress sensory organ development in certain regions of the body surface, apparently by antagonizing the function of the achaete and scute genes of the achaetescute complex (AS.C). We have found that emc encodes a novel member of the helix-loop-helix (HLH) family of proteins. The emc protein shares the dimerization domain of other HLH proteins but lacks their DNA binding motif. We propose a model in which the emc protein negatively regulates sensory organ determination by forming heterodimers with the HLH proteins encoded by the AS-C and/or daughterless, thereby altering or interfering with their activity.     

DNA binding properties of two Arabidopsis MADS domain proteins: binding consensus and dimer formation.

MADS domain proteins are members of a highly conserved family found in all eukaryotes. Genetic studies clearly indicate that many plant MADS domain proteins have different regulatory functions in flower development, yet they share a highly conserved DNA binding domain and can bind to very similar sequences. How, then, can these MADS box genes confer their specific functions? Here, we describe results from DNA binding studies of AGL1 and AGL2 (for AGAMOUS-like), two Arabidopsis MADS domain proteins that are preferentially expressed in flowers. We demonstrate that both proteins are sequence-specific DNA binding proteins and show that each binding consensus has distinct features, suggestion a mechanism for specificity. In addition, we show that the proteins with more similar amino acid sequences have more similar binding sequences. We also found that AGL2 binds to DNA in vitro as a dimer and determined the region of AGL2 that is sufficient for DNA binding and dimerization. Finally, we show that several plant MADS domain proteins can bind to DNA either as homodimers or as heterodimers, suggesting that the number of different regulators could be much greater than the number of MADS box genes.