Characterization of Melatonin-Induced FOS-Like Immunoreactivity in the Hypothalamic Suprachiasmatic Nucleus of the Rat

Abstract

The hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is primarily responsible for the regulation of circadian rhythmicity. Melatonin, the pineal-derived neurohormone, modulates the rhythmic output of the SCN. Properly timed exposure to melatonin is able to induce changes in rhythrnic function and thereby entrain circadian rhythms of activity.

c-fos is an immediate early gene that is transiently expressed in neurons in response to receptor activation. The ventrolateral portion of the SCN (vSCN) is activated in response to phase-shifting stimuli, an event which is marked by an increase in the expression of c-fos.

In the present study, rats systemically administered the melatonin agonist 2-iodomelatonin at CT 22 demonstrated significant dose-dependent Fos immunoreactivity within the vSCN, an effect which was significantly inhibited by the melatonin antagonist N-acetyltryptamine. The Fos expression observed in the vSCN was not affected by treatment with the serotonin antagonist ketanserin or the alpha-adrenergic antagonist phentolamine. Moreover, antisense oligonucleotides to c-fos, significantly blocked the ability of 2-iodomelatonin to induce Fos expression in the vSCN at CT 22.

These results pharmacologically characterize melatonin-induced c-fos expression in the rat vSCN and provide evidence to support a c-fos-mediated mechanism through which the activation of melatonin receptors may be linked to the long-term molecular regulation of circadian rhythms controlled by the SCN.     

Circadian rhythmicity of vasopressin levels in the cerebrospinal fluid of suprachiasmatic nucleus-lesioned and -grafted rats

Transplantation of the fetal suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) in arrhythmic SCN-lesioned rats can reinstate circadian drinking rhythms in 40% to 50% of the cases. In the current article, it was investigated whether the failure in the other rats could be due to the absence of a circadian rhythm in the grafted SCN, using a circadian vasopressin (VP) rhythm in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as the indicator for a rhythmic SCN. CSF was sampled in continuous darkness from-intact control rats and SCN-lesioned and -grafted rats. VP could be detected in all samples, with concentrations of 15 to 30 pg/ml in the control rats and 5 to 15 pg/ml in the grafted rats. A circadian VP rhythm with a two- to threefold difference between peak and nadir values was found in all 7 control rats but in only 4 of 13 experimental rats, despite the presence of a VP-positive SCN in all grafts. A circadian VP rhythm was present in 2 drinking rhythm-recovered rats (6 of 13) and in 2 nonrecovery rats. Apparently, in these latter rats, the failure of the grafted SCN to restore a circadian drinking rhythm cannot be attributed to a lack of rhythmicity in the SCN itself. Thus, the presence of a rhythmic grafted SCN, as is deduced from a circadian CSF VP rhythm, appears not to be sufficient for restoration of a circadian drinking rhythm in SCN-lesioned arrhythmic rats.     

Organotypic Suprachiasmatic Nuclei Cultures of Adult Voles Reflect Locomotor Behavior: Differences in Number of Vasopressin Cells

This study is the first to demonstrate organotypic culturing of adult suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN). This approach was used to obtain organotypic SCN cultures from adult vole brain with a previously determined state of behavioral circadian rhythmicity. We examined vasopressin (AVP) immunoreactivity in these organotypic slice cultures. AVP is one of the major neuropeptides produced by the SCN, the main mammalian circadian pacemaker. AVP immunoreactivity in the SCN of adult common voles in vivo has been shown to correlate with the variability in expression of circadian wheel-running behavior. Here, cultures prepared from circadian rhythmic and nonrhythmic voles were processed immunocytochemically for AVP. Whereas in all cultures AVP could be observed, AVP immunoreactivity differed considerably between vole SCN cultures. SCN cultures from rhythmic voles contained significantly lower numbers of AVP immunoreactive (AVPir) cells per surface area than cultures from nonrhythmic voles. The correlation between timing of behavior and AVP immunoreactivity in vitro is similar to the correlation found earlier in vivo. Apparently, such correlation depends on intrinsic AVP regulation mechanisms of SCN tissue, and not on neural or hormonal input from the environment, as present in intact brain.     

大鼠视交叉上核与松果体中Clock基因转录的昼夜节律性及不同光反应性

本研究旨在观察和比较视交叉上核（suprachiasmatic nucleus,SCN）与松果体（pineal gland,pG）中Clock基因内源性昼夜转录变化规律以及光照对其的影响。Sprague-Dawley大鼠在持续黑暗（constant darkness,DD）和12h光照：12h黑暗交替（12hourlight：12hour-darkcycle,LD）光制下分别被饲养8周（n=36）和4周n=36）后,在一昼夜内每隔4h采集一组SCN和PG组织（n=6）,提取总RNA,用竞争性定量RT-PCR测定不同昼夜时点（circadian times．CT or zeitgeber times．ZT）各样品中Clock基因的mRNA相对表达量,通过余弦法和ClockLab软件获取节律参数,并经振幅检验是否存在昼夜节律性转录变化。结果如下：（1）SCN中Clock基因mRNA的转录在DD光制下呈现昼低夜高节律性振荡变化（P〈0．05）,PG中Clock基因的转录也显示相似的内源性节律外观,即峰值出现于主观夜晚（SCN为CTl5,PG为CT18）,谷值位于主观白天（SCN为CT3,PG为CT6）（P〉0．05）。（2）LD光制下SCN中Clock基因的转录也具有昼夜节律性振荡（P〈0．05）,但与其DD光制下节律外观相比,呈现反时相节律变化（P〈0．05）,且其表达的振幅及峰值的mRNA水平均增加（P〈0．05）,而PG中Clock基因在LD光制下转录的相应节律参数变化却恰恰相反（P〈0．05）。（3）在LD光制下,光照使PG中Clock基因转录的节律外观反时相于SCN（P〈0．05）,即在SCN和PG的峰值分别出现于光照期ZT10和黑暗期ZT17,谷值分别位于黑暗期ZT22和光照期ZT5。结果表明,Clock基因的昼夜转录在SCN和PG中存在同步的内源性节律本质,而光导引在这两个中枢核团调节Clock基因昼夜节律性转录方面有着不同的作用。     

Organotypic suprachiasmatic nuclei cultures of adult voles reflect locomotor behavior: differences in number of vasopressin cells

This study is the first to demonstrate organotypic culturing of adult suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN). This approach was used to obtain organotypic SCN cultures from adult vole brain with a previously determined state of behavioral circadian rhythmicity. We examined vasopressin (AVP) immunoreactivity in these organotypic slice cultures. AVP is one of the major neuropeptides produced by the SCN, the main mammalian circadian pacemaker. AVP immunoreactivity in the SCN of adult common voles in vivo has been shown to correlate with the variability in expression of circadian wheel-running behavior. Here, cultures prepared from circadian rhythmic and nonrhythmic voles were processed immunocytochemically for AVP. Whereas in all cultures AVP could be observed, AVP immunoreactivity differed considerably between vole SCN cultures. SCN cultures from rhythmic voles contained significantly lower numbers of AVP immunoreactive (AVPir) cells per surface area than cultures from nonrhythmic voles. The correlation between timing of behavior and AVP immunoreactivity in vitro is similar to the correlation found earlier in vivo. Apparently, such correlation depends on intrinsic AVP regulation mechanisms of SCN tissue, and not on neural or hormonal input from the environment, as present in intact brain.     

mPer2 antisense oligonucleotides inhibit mPER2 expression but not circadian rhythms of physiological activity in cultured suprachiasmatic nucleus neurons

Various day-night rhythms, observed at molecular, cellular, and behavioral levels, are governed by an endogenous circadian clock, predominantly functioning in the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). A class of clock genes, mammalian Period (mPer), is known to be rhythmically expressed in SCN neurons, but the correlation between mPER protein levels and autonomous rhythmic activity in SCN neurons is not well understood. Therefore, we blocked mPer translation using antisense phosphothioate oligonucleotides (ODNs) for mPer1 and mPer2 mRNAs and examined the effects on the circadian rhythm of cytosolic Ca2+ concentration and action potentials in SCN slice cultures. Treatment with mPer2 ODNs (20microM for 3 days) but not randomized control ODNs significantly reduced mPER2 immunoreactivity (-63%) in the SCN. Nevertheless, mPer1/2 ODNs treatment inhibited neither action potential firing rhythms nor cytosolic Ca2+ rhythms. These suggest that circadian rhythms in mPER protein levels are not necessarily coupled to autonomous rhythmic activity in SCN neurons.     

Seasonal molecular timekeeping within the rat circadian clock

In temperate zones duration of daylight, i.e. photoperiod, changes with the seasons. The changing photoperiod affects animal as well as human physiology. All mammals exhibit circadian rhythms and a circadian clock controlling the rhythms is located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus. The SCN consists of two parts differing morphologically and functionally, namely of the ventrolateral (VL) and the dorsomedial (DM). Many aspects of SCN-driven rhythmicity are affected by the photoperiod. The aim of the present overview is to summarize data about the effect of the photoperiod on the molecular timekeeping mechanism in the rat SCN, especially the effect on core clock genes, clock-controlled genes and clock-related genes expression. The summarized data indicate that the photoperiod affects i) clock-driven rhythm in photoinduction of c-fos gene and its protein product within the VL SCN, ii) clock-driven spontaneous rhythms in clock-controlled, i.e. arginine-vasopressin, and in clock-related, i.e. c-fos, gene expression within the DM SCN, and iii) the core clockwork mechanism within the rat SCN. Hence, the whole central timekeeping mechanism within the rat circadian clock measures not only the daytime but also the time of the year, i.e. the actual season.     

Mammalian circadian signaling networks and therapeutic targets

Virtually all cells in the body have an intracellular clockwork based on a negative feedback mechanism. The circadian timekeeping system in mammals is a hierarchical multi-oscillator network, with the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) acting as the central pacemaker. The SCN synchronizes to daily light-dark cycles and coordinates rhythmic physiology and behavior. Synchronization in the SCN and at the organismal level is a key feature of the circadian clock system. In particular, intercellular coupling in the SCN synchronizes neuron oscillators and confers robustness against perturbations. Recent advances in our knowledge of and ability to manipulate circadian rhythms make available cell-based clock models, which lack strong coupling and are ideal for target discovery and chemical biology.     

Early development of circadian rhythmicity in the suprachiamatic nuclei and pineal gland of teleost,flounder (Paralichthys olivaeus), embryos

Circadian rhythms enable organisms to coordinate multiple physiological processes and behaviors with the earth's rotation. In mammals, the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN), the sole master circadian pacemaker, has entrainment mechanisms that set the circadian rhythm to a 24‐h cycle with photic signals from retina. In contrast, the zebrafish SCN is not a circadian pacemaker, instead the pineal gland (PG) houses the major circadian oscillator. The SCN of flounder larvae, unlike that of zebrafish, however, expresses per2 with a rhythmicity of daytime/ON and nighttime/OFF. Here, we examined whether the rhythm of per2 expression in the flounder SCN represents the molecular clock. We also examined early development of the circadian rhythmicity in the SCN and PG. Our three major findings were as follows. First, rhythmic per2 expression in the SCN was maintained under 24 h dark (DD) conditions, indicating that a molecular clock exists in the flounder SCN. Second, onset of circadian rhythmicity in the SCN preceded that in the PG. Third, both 24 h light (LL) and DD conditions deeply affected the development of circadian rhythmicity in the SCN and PG. This is the first report dealing with the early development of circadian rhythmicity in the SCN in fish.     

Synchronization-induced rhythmicity of circadian oscillators in the suprachiasmatic nucleus

The suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) host a robust, self-sustained circadian pacemaker that coordinates physiological rhythms with the daily changes in the environment. Neuronal clocks within the SCN form a heterogeneous network that must synchronize to maintain timekeeping activity. Coherent circadian output of the SCN tissue is established by intercellular signaling factors, such as vasointestinal polypeptide. It was recently shown that besides coordinating cells, the synchronization factors play a crucial role in the sustenance of intrinsic cellular rhythmicity. Disruption of intercellular signaling abolishes sustained rhythmicity in a majority of neurons and desynchronizes the remaining rhythmic neurons. Based on these observations, the authors propose a model for the synchronization of circadian oscillators that combines intracellular and intercellular dynamics at the single-cell level. The model is a heterogeneous network of circadian neuronal oscillators where individual oscillators are damped rather than self-sustained. The authors simulated different experimental conditions and found that: (1) in normal, constant conditions, coupled circadian oscillators quickly synchronize and produce a coherent output; (2) in large populations, such oscillators either synchronize or gradually lose rhythmicity, but do not run out of phase, demonstrating that rhythmicity and synchrony are codependent; (3) the number of oscillators and connectivity are important for these synchronization properties; (4) slow oscillators have a higher impact on the period in mixed populations; and (5) coupled circadian oscillators can be efficiently entrained by light–dark cycles. Based on these results, it is predicted that: (1) a majority of SCN neurons needs periodic synchronization signal to be rhythmic; (2) a small number of neurons or a low connectivity results in desynchrony; and (3) amplitudes and phases of neurons are negatively correlated. The authors conclude that to understand the orchestration of timekeeping in the SCN, intracellular circadian clocks cannot be isolated from their intercellular communication components.     

Distinct pharmacological mechanisms leading to c-fos gene expression in the fetal suprachiasmatic nucleus.

Maternal treatment with cocaine or a D1-dopamine receptor agonist induces c-fos gene expression in the fetal suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN). Other treatments that induce c-fos expression in the fetal SCN include caffeine and nicotine. In the current article, the authors assessed whether these different pharmacological treatments activate c-fos expression by a common neurochemical mechanism. The results indicate the presence of at least two distinct pharmacological pathways to c-fos expression in the fetal rat SCN. Previous studies demonstrate that prenatal activation of dopamine receptors affects the developing circadian system. The present work shows that stimulant drugs influence the fetal brain through multiple transmitter systems and further suggests that there may be multiple pathways leading to entrainment of the fetal biological clock.     

Gates and oscillators: a network model of the brain clock

The suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) control circadian oscillations of physiology and behavior. Measurements of electrical activity and of gene expression indicate that these heterogeneous structures are composed of both rhythmic and nonrhythmic cells. A fundamental question with regard to the organization of the circadian system is how the SCN achieve a coherent output while their constituent independent cellular oscillators express a wide range of periods. Previously, the consensus output of individual oscillators had been attributed to coupling among cells. The authors propose a model that incorporates nonrhythmic "gate" cells and rhythmic oscillator cells with a wide range of periods, that neither requires nor excludes a role for interoscillator coupling. The gate provides daily input to oscillator cells and is in turn regulated (directly or indirectly) by the oscillator cells. In the authors' model, individual oscillators with initial random phases are able to self-assemble so as to maintain cohesive rhythmic output. In this view, SCN circuits are important for self-sustained oscillation, and their network properties distinguish these nuclei from other tissues that rhythmically express clock genes. The model explains how individual SCN cells oscillate independently and yet work together to produce a coherent rhythm.     

Effects of preparation time on phase of cultured tissues reveal complexity of circadian organization

The phases of central (SCN) and peripheral circadian oscillators are held in specific relationships under LD cycles but, in the absence of external rhythmic input, may damp or drift out of phase with each other. Rats exposed to prolonged constant light become behaviorally arrhythmic, perhaps as a consequence of dissociation of phases among SCN cells. The authors asked whether individual central and peripheral circadian oscillators were rhythmic in LL-treated arrhythmic rats and, if rhythmic, what were the phase relationships between them. The authors prepared SCN, pineal gland, pituitary, and cornea cultures from transgenic Period1-luciferaserats whose body temperature and locomotor activity were arrhythmic and from several groups of rhythmic rats held in LD, DD, and short-term LL. The authors measured mPer1gene expression by recording light output with sensitive photomultipliers. Most of the cultures from all groups displayed circadian rhythms. This could reflect persistent rhythmicity in vivo prior to culture or, alternatively, rhythmicity that may have been initiated by the culture procedure. To test this, the authors cultured tissues at 2 different times 12 h apart and asked whether phase of the rhythm was related to culture time. The pineal, pituitary, and SCN cultures showed partial or complete dependence of phase on culture time, while peak phases of the cornea cultures were independent of culture time in rhythmic rats and were randomly distributed regardless of culture time in arrhythmic animals. These results suggest that in behaviorally arrhythmic rats, oscillators in the pineal, pituitary, and SCN had been arrhythmic or severely damped in vivo, while the cornea oscillator was free running. The peak phases of the SCN cultures were particularly sensitive to some aspect of the culture procedure since rhythmicity of SCN cultures from robustly rhythmic LD-entrained rats was strongly influenced when the procedure was carried out at any time except the 2nd half of the day.