Mycobacteriophage Bxb1 integrates into the Mycobacterium smegmatis groEL1 gene

Mycobacteriophage Bxb1 is a temperate phage of Mycobacterium smegmatis and forms stable lysogens in which the Bxb1 genome is integrated into the host chromosome. Bxb1 encodes an integrase of the large serine recombinase family that catalyses integration and excision of the Bxb1 genome. We show here that Bxb1 integrates into a chromosomal attB site located within the 3' end of the groEL1 gene such that integration results in alteration of the C-terminal 21 amino acid residues. An integration-proficient plasmid vector containing the Bxb1 integrase gene and flanking DNA sequences efficiently transforms M. smegmatis via integration at attB. Bxb1-integrated recombinants are stable and fully compatible with L5 integration vectors. Strand exchange occurs within an 8 bp common core sequence present in attB and within an attP site situated immediately upstream of the phage integrase gene. Establishment of a defined in vitro system for Bxb1 integration shows that recombination occurs efficiently without requirement for high-energy cofactors, divalent metals, DNA supercoiling or additional proteins.     

Activity of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase overproduced in E. coli with wild-type and mutant GroEL.

The homo-oligomeric protein chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) has previously been shown to interact with a chaperone GroEL in vitro, suggesting a possible involvement of GroEL in CAT assembly. CAT was overproduced to various levels in the presence and absence of GroEL overproduction, and in groEL mutants. CAT was accumulated to 9-45% of total cellular protein in a fully soluble form, without formation of inclusion bodies. In all cases, even with groEL mutants, CAT specific activity was shown proportional to the amount of protein produced, indicating the formation of active trimer CAT structure does not need GroEL in Escherichia coli.     

Only one of five groEL genes is required for viability and successful symbiosis in Sinorhizobium meliloti

Many bacterial species contain multiple copies of the genes that encode the chaperone GroEL and its cochaperone, GroES, including all of the fully sequenced root-nodulating bacteria that interact symbiotically with legumes to generate fixed nitrogen. In particular, in Sinorhizobium meliloti there are four groESL operons and one groEL gene. To uncover functional redundancies of these genes during growth and symbiosis, we attempted to construct strains containing all combinations of groEL mutations. Although a double groEL1 groEL2 mutant cannot be constructed, we demonstrate that the quadruple groEL1 groESL3 groEL4 groESL5 and groEL2 groESL3 groEL4 groESL5 mutants are viable. Therefore, like E. coli and other species, S. meliloti requires only one groEL gene for viability, and either groEL1 or groEL2 will suffice. The groEL1 groESL5 double mutant is more severely affected for growth at both 30 degrees C and 40 degrees C than the single mutants, suggesting overlapping functions in stress response. During symbiosis the quadruple groEL2 groESL3 groEL4 groESL5 mutant acts like the wild type, but the quadruple groEL1 groESL3 groEL4 groESL5 mutant acts like the groEL1 single mutant, which cannot fully induce nod gene expression and forms ineffective nodules. Therefore, the only groEL gene required for symbiosis is groEL1. However, we show that the other groE genes are expressed in the nodule at lower levels, suggesting minor roles during symbiosis. Combining our data with other data, we conclude that groESL1 encodes the housekeeping GroEL/GroES chaperone and that groESL5 is specialized for stress response.     

Interaction of the heat shock protein GroEL of Escherichia coli with single-stranded DNA-binding protein: suppression of ssb-113 by groEL46.

Previous studies from our laboratory have shown that an allele of the heat shock protein GroEL (groEL411) is able to specifically suppress some of the physiological defects of the single-stranded DNA-binding protein mutation ssb-1. A search for additional alleles of the groE genes which may act as suppressors for ssb mutations has led to the identification of groEL46 as a specific suppressor of ssb-113. It has very little or no effect on ssb-1 or ssb-3. All of the physiological defects of ssb-113, including temperature-sensitive growth, temperature-sensitive DNA synthesis, sensitivity to UV irradiation, methyl methanesulfonate, and bleomycin, and reduced recombinational capacity, are restored to wild-type levels. The ssb-113 allele, however, is unable to restore sensitivity of groEL46 cells to phage lambda. The mechanism of suppression of ssb-113 by groEL46 appears to differ from that of ssb-1 by groEL411. The data suggest that GroEL may interact with single-stranded DNA-binding protein in more than one domain.     

Identification of important amino acid residues that modulate binding of Escherichia coli GroEL to its various cochaperones

Genetic experiments have shown that the GroEL/GroES chaperone machine of Escherichia coli is absolutely essential, not only for bacterial growth but also for the propagation of many bacteriophages including lambda. The virulent bacteriophages T4 and RB49 are independent of the host GroES function, because they encode their own cochaperone proteins, Gp31 and CocO, respectively. E. coli groEL44 mutant bacteria do not form colonies above 42 degrees nor do they propagate bacteriophages lambda, T4, or RB49. We found that the vast majority (40/46) of spontaneous groEL44 temperature-resistant colonies at 43 degrees were due to the presence of an intragenic suppressor mutation. These suppressors define 21 different amino acid substitutions in GroEL, each affecting one of 13 different amino acid residues. All of these amino acid residues are located at or near the hinge, which regulates the large en bloc movements of the GroEL apical domain. All of these intragenic suppressors support bacteriophages lambda, T4, and RB49 growth to various extents in the presence of the groEL44 allele. Since it is known that the GroEL44 mutant protein does not interact effectively with Gp31, the suppressor mutations should enhance cochaperone binding. Analogous intragenic suppressor studies were conducted with the groEL673 temperature-sensitive allele.     

The Bxb1 gp47 recombination directionality factor is required not only for prophage excision, but also for phage DNA replication

Mycobacteriophage Bxb1 encodes a serine-integrase that catalyzes both integrative and excisive site-specific recombination. However, excision requires a second phage-encoded protein, gp47, which serves as a recombination directionality factor (RDF). The viability of a Bxb1 mutant containing an S153A substitution in gp47 that eliminates the RDF activity of Bxb1 gp47 shows that excision is not required for Bxb1 lytic growth. However, the inability to construct a Δ47 deletion mutant of Bxb1 suggests that gp47 provides a second function that is required for lytic growth, although the possibility of an essential cis-acting site cannot be excluded. Characterization of a mutant prophage of mycobacteriophage L5 in which gene 54 - a homologue of Bxb1 gene 47 - is deleted shows that it also is defective in induced lytic growth, and exhibits a strong defect in DNA replication. Bxb1 gp47 and its relatives are also unusual in containing conserved motifs associated with a phosphoesterase function, although we have not been able to show robust phosphoesterase activity of the proteins, and amino acid substitutions with the conserved motifs do not interfere with RDF activity. We therefore propose that Bxb1 gp47 and its relatives provide an important function in phage DNA replication that has been co-opted by the integration machinery of the serine-integrases to control the directionality of recombination.     

Non‐housekeeping,non‐essential GroEL (chaperonin) has acquired novel structure and function beneficial under stress in cyanobacteria

GroELs which are prokaryotic members of the chaperonin (Cpn)/Hsp60 family are molecular chaperones of which Escherichia coli GroEL is a model for subsequent research. The majority of bacterial species including E. coli and Bacillus subtilis have only one essential groEL gene that forms an operon with the co‐chaperone groES gene. In contrast to these model bacteria, two or three groEL genes exist in cyanobacterial genomes. One of them, groEL2, does not form an operon with the groES gene, whereas the other(s) does. In the case of cyanobacteria containing two GroEL homologs, one of the GroELs, GroEL1, substitutes for the native GroEL in an E. coli cell, but GroEL2 does not. Unlike the E. coli GroEL, GroEL2 is not essential, but it plays an important role which is not substitutable by GroEL1 under stress. Regulation of expression and biochemical properties of GroEL2 are different/diversified from GroEL1 and E. coli GroEL in many aspects. We postulate that the groEL2 gene has acquired a novel, beneficial function especially under stresses and become preserved by natural selection, with the groEL1 gene retaining the original, house‐keeping function. In this review, we will focus on difference between the two GroELs in cyanobacteria, and divergence of GroEL2 from the E. coli GroEL. We will also compare cyanobacterial GroELs with the chloroplast Cpns (60α and 60β) which are thought to be evolved from the cyanobacterial GroEL1. Chloroplast Cpns appear to follow the different path from cyanobacterial GroELs in the evolution after gene duplication of the corresponding ancestral groEL gene.     

From minichaperone to GroEL 2: importance of avidity of the multisite ring structure

Structural studies on minichaperones and GroEL imply a continuous ring of binding sites around the neck of GroEL. To investigate the importance of this ring, we constructed an artificial heptameric assembly of minichaperones to mimic their arrangement in GroEL. The heptameric Gp31 co-chaperonin from bacteriophage T4, an analogue of GroES, was used as a scaffold to display the GroEL minichaperones. A fusion protein, MC(7), was generated by replacing a part of the highly mobile loop of Gp31 (residues 23-44) with the sequence of the minichaperone (residues 191-376 of GroEL). The purified recombinant protein assembled into a heptameric ring composed of seven 30.6 kDa subunits. Although single minichaperones (residues 193-335 to 191-376 of GroEL) have certain chaperone activities in vitro and in vivo, they cannot refold heat and dithiothreitol-denatured mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase (mtMDH), a reaction that normally requires GroEL, its co-chaperonin GroES and ATP. But, MC(7) refolded MDH in vitro. The expression of MC(7) complements in vivo two temperature-sensitive Escherichia coli alleles, groEL44 and groEL673, at 43 degrees C. Although MC(7) could not compensate for the complete absence of GroEL in vivo, it enhanced the colony-forming ability of cells containing limiting amounts of wild-type GroEL at 37 degrees C. MC(7 )also reduces aggregate formation and cell death in mammalian cell models of Huntington's disease. The assembly of seven minichaperone subunits on a heptameric ring significantly improves their activity, demonstrating the importance of avidity in GroEL function.     

The tail of a chaperonin: the C-terminal region of Esctierichia coli GroEL protein

The active form of the KSP60 molecular chaperone of Escherichia coli, GroEL, is a pair of seven-membered rings. We have used site-directed mutagenesis to construct forms of the 547-amino-acid monomer truncated at the C-terminus. We show here that forms that are 520 amino acids long or longer are close to being fully functional. Removing one further amino acid, however, results in a protein, GroEL519, which retains little function. This truncated form is metabolically stable but is not recovered from the cell in particle form. When synthesized at high levels, it prevents the normal assembly of GroEL547 present in the same cell. When synthesized at low levels, it can be included, probably at low molar ratios, in particles formed by assembly-competent forms of GroEL. This can be seen as partial complementation of the temperature-sensitive mutant groEL44. We conclude that amino acid 520 is cruical for particle assembly. GroEL516 has in vivo properties similar to those of GroEL519, but the still shorter form, GroEL504, appears to be inactive.     

Genome organization and characterization of mycobacteriophage Bxb1

Mycobacteriophage Bxb1 is a temperate phage of Mycobacterium smegmatis. The morphology of Bxb1 particles is similar to that of mycobacteriophages L5 and D29, although Bxb1 differs from these phages in other respects. First, it is heteroimmune with L5 and efficiently forms plaques on an L5 lysogen. Secondly, it has a different host range and fails to infect slow-growing mycobacteria, using a receptor system that is apparently different from that of L5 and D29. Thirdly, it is the first mycobacteriophage to be described that forms a large prominent halo around plaques on a lawn of M. smegmatis. The sequence of the Bxb1 genome shows that it possesses a similar overall organization to the genomes of L5 and D29 and shares weak but detectable DNA sequence similarity to these phages within the structural genes. However, Bxb1 uses a different system of integration and excision, a repressor with different specificity to that of L5 and encodes a large number of novel gene products including several with enzymatic functions that could degrade or modify the mycobacterial cell wall.     

An ORFan no more: the bacteriophage T4 39.2 gene product, NwgI, modulates GroEL chaperone function

Bacteriophages are the most abundant biological entities in our biosphere, characterized by their hyperplasticity, mosaic composition, and the many unknown functions (ORFans) encoded by their immense genetic repertoire. These genes are potentially maintained by the bacteriophage to allow efficient propagation on hosts encountered in nature. To test this hypothesis, we devised a selection to identify bacteriophage-encoded gene(s) that modulate the host Escherichia coli GroEL/GroES chaperone machine, which is essential for the folding of certain host and bacteriophage proteins. As a result, we identified the bacteriophage RB69 gene 39.2, of previously unknown function and showed that homologs of 39.2 in bacteriophages T4, RB43, and RB49 similarly modulate GroEL/GroES. Production of wild-type bacteriophage T4 Gp39.2, a 58-amino-acid protein, (a) enables diverse bacteriophages to plaque on the otherwise nonpermissive groES or groEL mutant hosts in an allele-specific manner, (b) suppresses the temperature-sensitive phenotype of both groES and groEL mutants, (c) suppresses the defective UV-induced PolV function (UmuCD) of the groEL44 mutant, and (d) is lethal to the host when overproduced. Finally, as proof of principle that Gp39.2 is essential for bacteriophage growth on certain bacterial hosts, we constructed a T4 39.2 deletion strain and showed that, unlike the isogenic wild-type parent, it is incapable of propagating on certain groEL mutant hosts. We propose a model of how Gp39.2 modulates GroES/GroEL function.     

The chaperonins of Synechocystis PCC 6803 differ in heat inducibility and chaperone activity.

The chaperonins GroEL and Cpn60 were isolated from the cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC 6803 and characterized. In cells grown under optimal conditions their ratio was about one to one. However, the amount of GroEL increased considerably more than that of Cpn60 in response to heat stress. The labile chaperonin oligomer required stabilization by MgATP or glycerol during isolation. Use of the E. coli mutant strain, groEL44 revealed that the functional properties of the two cyanobacterial chaperonins are strikingly different. Overexpression of cyanobacterial GroEL in the E. coli mutant strain allowed growth at elevated temperature, the formation of mature bacteriophage T4, and active Rubisco enzyme assembly. In contrast, Cpn60 partially complemented the temperature-sensitive phenotype, the Rubisco assembly defect and did not promote the growth of the bacteriophage T4. The difference in chaperone activity of the two cyanobacterial chaperonins very probably reflects the unique chaperonin properties required during the life of Synechocystis PCC 6803.     

Antibody response to GroEL varies in patients with acute Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection

Although heat-shock proteins represent major antigens in a wide spectrum of bacterial infections, their immunogenicity is not known for Mycoplasma pneumoniae. M. pneumoniae is a major human respiratory pathogen and it has been suggested that its groEL gene might be dispensable in vitro. Using the specific monoclonal antibody 2C2/C3 we found an abundant synthesis of about 58 kDa GroEL in M. pneumoniae reference strains and in 15 clinical isolates examined at low and higher passages. In patients with acute respiratory disease caused by M. pneumoniae immunoblot analyses showed relatively low prevalence of systemic antibodies against its GroEL protein. Whereas all patients had strong antibody response to the P1 adhesin, only 5 of 29 patients (17.2%) had antibodies to GroEL. Among them, patient RI raised an early and very strong antibody response to GroEL. During the convalescent phase, levels of his serum IgG (mainly IgG2) to GroEL increased and were higher than levels of IgG to P1.     

Multiple groESL operons are not key targets of RpoH1 and RpoH2 in Sinorhizobium meliloti

Among the rhizobia that establish nitrogen-fixing nodules on the roots of host plants, many contain multiple copies of genes encoding the sigma factor RpoH and the chaperone GroEL/GroES. In Sinorhizobium meliloti there are two rpoH genes, four groESL operons, and one groEL gene. rpoH1 mutants are defective for growth at high temperature and form ineffective nodules, rpoH1 rpoH2 double mutants are unable to form nodules, and groESL1 mutants form ineffective nodules. To explore the roles of RpoH1 and RpoH2, we identified mutants that suppress both the growth and nodulation defects. These mutants do not suppress the nitrogen fixation defect. This implies that the functions of RpoH1 during growth and RpoH1/RpoH2 during the initiation of symbiosis are similar but that there is a different function of RpoH1 needed later during symbiosis. We showed that, unlike in Escherichia coli, overexpression of groESL is not sufficient to bypass any of the RpoH defects. Under free-living conditions, we determined that RpoH2 does not control expression of the groE genes, and RpoH1 only controls expression of groESL5. Finally, we completed the series of groE mutants by constructing groESL3 and groEL4 mutants and demonstrated that they do not display symbiotic defects. Therefore, the only groESL operon required by itself for symbiosis is groESL1. Taken together, these results suggest that GroEL/GroES production alone cannot explain the requirements for RpoH1 and RpoH2 in S. meliloti and that there must be other crucial targets.     

Properties and biosynthesis of cyclopropane fatty acids in Escherichia coli.

The lipid phase transition of Escherichia coli phospholipids containing cyclopropane fatty acids was compared with the otherwise homologous phospholipids lacking cyclopropane fatty acids. The phase transitions (determined by scanning calorimetry) of the two preparations were essentially identical. Infection of E. coli with phage T3 inhibited cyclopropane fatty acid formation over 98%, whereas infection with mutants which lack the phage coded S-adenosylmethionine cleavage enzyme had no effect on cyclopropane fatty acid synthesis. These data indicate that S-adenosylmethionine is the methylene in cyclopropane fatty acid synthesis.     

Effects of mutations in heat-shock genes groES and groEL on protein export in Escherichia coli.

Escherichia coli heat-shock proteins GroES and GroEL are essential cytoplasmic proteins, which have been termed 'chaperonins' because of their ability to assist protein assembly of bacteriophage capsids and multimeric enzymes of foreign origin. In this report we show that temperature-sensitive mutations in groES and groEL genes cause defective export of the plasmid-encoded beta-lactamase (Bla) in vivo. Since efficient translocation of proteins across biological membranes is thought to be supported by cytoplasmic factors that protect presecretory molecules from being misfolded, these results suggest that both GroES and GroEL proteins possess a chaperone function by which they facilitate export of Bla. The translocation of other secretory proteins, however, appears to depend minimally on GroE, suggesting that GroE interacts only with a specific class of secreted proteins.