植物UDP-糖基转移酶分类、功能以及进化

糖基转移酶(glycosyltransferases,GT;EC 2.4.x.y)是一个多成员的基因家族,根据其底物特异性和催化特异性被分为99个不同的家族。糖基化反应是由GT催化的一些糖类或非糖类生物分子附加糖基形成共价结合的过程。家族1糖基转移酶一般以尿苷二磷酸-糖(UDP-糖)作为糖基供体,催化糖分子转移到受体分子上,从而调节受体分子生物活性,水溶性和稳定性等。在调节植物激素平衡、内外源物质的解毒以及防御反应和次生代谢产物的修饰方面发挥着重要作用。本综述对UDP-糖基转移酶的分类、命名、功能以及进化进行综述,以期为糖基转移酶相关研究提供一定参考。     

β-1,4-半乳糖基转移酶家族的研究进展

β-1,4-半乳糖基转移酶是近年来糖基转移酶中研究得最多的一种。随着新成员的不断发现和克隆,进一步探求其重要生物学功能已成为研究热点。目前研究结果表明该酶与受精过程,细胞黏附和转移,癌细胞转移,表皮细胞增殖及细胞信号传导等重要生物学功能密切相关。     

环糊精糖基转移酶产物专一性改造：难题与挑战

生产环糊精所必需的环糊精糖基转移酶与其产物专一性进化研究已经成为当今的研究热点。这项研究中的进展不仅会使环糊精糖基转移酶的应用取得突破结果,还会对其它酶的改造提供帮助。目前,人们对这类酶的性质已经有了较为深入的认识,但还存在着一些尚未解决的问题,如酶产物专一性的决定因素尚未系统阐明等。通过对环糊精糖基转移酶各个方面,尤其是其产物专一性进化方面研究的回顾,指出并分析了研究中尚未解决的问题,并对将来这一研究领域的前景进行了展望。     

环糊精糖基转移酶产物专一性改造：难题与挑战

生产环糊精所必需的环糊精糖基转移酶与其产物专一性进化研究已经成为当今的研究热点。这项研究中的进展不仅会使环糊精糖基转移酶的应用取得突破结果,还会对其它酶的改造提供帮助。目前,人们对这类酶的性质已经有了较为深入的认识,但还存在着一些尚未解决的问题,如酶产物专一性的决定因素尚未系统阐明等。通过对环糊精糖基转移酶各个方面,尤其是其产物专一性进化方面研究的回顾,指出并分析了研究中尚未解决的问题,并对将来这一研究领域的前景进行了展望。     

植物花青素糖基转移酶研究进展

花青素是植物体内重要的次生代谢物,具有较强的药理活性,如抗氧化、抗癌等,广泛用于营养保健领域。自然条件下,植物体内的花青素以糖苷形式存在,带有各种糖基化修饰,而花青素糖基转移酶是专门负责催化这种糖基化反应的酶,能够把糖基供体转移到花青素不同的位点,形成了不同的花青素种类,从而改变这些分子的特性,影响生物活性和药用功能。本文重点综述了植物花青素糖基转移酶的分类和修饰反应特点,以及主要花青素资源植物中糖基转移酶的研究进展,有助于深入挖掘和鉴定植物中花青素相关糖基转移酶,解析其催化和调控机理,为花青素生物合成、富含花青素的植物资源研发提供新的思路。     

常见致病菌糖基转移酶的结构与功能

糖基转移酶(glycosyltransferases,GTs)将糖基从活化的供体转移到糖、脂、蛋白质和核酸等受体,其参与的蛋白质糖基化是最重要的翻译后修饰(post-translational modifications,PTMs)之一。近年来越来越多的研究证明,糖基转移酶与致病菌毒力密切相关,在致病菌的黏附、免疫逃逸和定殖等生物学过程中发挥关键作用。目前,已鉴定的糖基转移酶根据其蛋白质三维结构特征分为3种类型GT-A、GT-B和GT-C,其中常见的是GT-A和GT-B型。在致病菌中发挥黏附功能的糖基转移酶,在结构上属于GT-B或GT-C型,对致病菌表面蛋白质(黏附蛋白、自转运蛋白等)进行糖基化修饰,在致病菌黏附、生物被膜的形成和毒力机制发挥具有重要作用。糖基转移酶不仅参与致病菌黏附这一感染初始过程,其中属于GT-A型的一类致病菌糖基转移酶会进入宿主细胞,通过糖基化宿主蛋白质影响宿主信号传导、蛋白翻译和免疫应答等生物学功能。本文就常见致病菌糖基转移酶的结构及其糖基化在致病机制中的作用进行综述,着重介绍了特异性糖基化高分子量(high-molecular-weight,HMW)黏附蛋白的糖基转移酶、针对富丝氨酸重复蛋白(serine-rich repeat proteins,SRRP)糖基化修饰的糖基转移酶、细菌自转运蛋白庚糖基转移酶(bacterial autotransporter heptosyltransferase,BAHT)家族、N-糖基化蛋白质系统和进入宿主细胞发挥毒力作用的大型梭菌细胞毒素、军团菌(Legionella)葡萄糖基转移酶以及肠杆菌科的效应子NleB。为揭示致病菌中糖基转移酶致病机制的系统性研究提供参考,为未来致病菌的诊断、药物设计研发以及疫苗开发等提供科学依据和思路。     

综述: 糖基转移酶超家族在肿瘤转移中的作用

蛋白质的糖基化修饰主要包括N-连接糖基化、O-连接糖基化和糖基磷脂酰肌醇锚定连接．与核酸和蛋白质不同,糖链的合成过程并不遵循传统的基因信息传递的中心法则,主要由一系列催化糖苷键形成的糖基转移酶完成．异常糖基化修饰被认为与恶性肿瘤的发生发展和临床预后密切相关．研究表明,糖基转移酶的表达及其糖链结构的异常可通过调节肿瘤细胞与细胞外基质的相互作用,继而影响肿瘤转移的关键步骤,如上皮间质转化(E-钙黏着蛋白、N-钙黏着蛋白)、细胞的移动性(整合素β1和α5)、侵袭(基质金属蛋白酶MMPs)、浸润(唾液酸化Lewis抗原sLeX和sLeA)．本文主要就唾液酰基转移酶、岩藻糖基转移酶和N-乙酰氨基葡萄糖转移酶等三大糖基转移酶家族的结构和生物学功能及其在肿瘤转移中的作用作一综述,以期为肿瘤转移的预测和诊断提供新思路．     

参与木葡聚糖合成的糖基转移酶基因研究进展

半纤维素多糖木葡聚糖(XyG)存在于大多数植物的初生细胞壁中, 对细胞壁的结构组织和生长发育具有重要的调控作用。XyG在植物进化中存在结构的多样性。该文概述了参与XyG合成的糖基转移酶的最新研究进展, XyG合成需要多种糖基转移酶参与, 这些酶类很可能以蛋白酶复合体的形式存在并发挥作用, XyG的结构和组成的改变对植物的生长发育也产生影响。     

植物糖基转移酶在植物抗病过程中的研究进展

植物在复杂的环境中进化出了各种反应来应对危害,其中糖基化作用就是植物利用的一种主要的生理机制.糖基化作用通过改变受体化合物的生物活性及其细胞内的定位来降低外物质对自身的影响,从而达到植物体生理代谢的稳态.植物中的糖基转移酶就是专门负责实现这种糖基化反应的酶类.简要概述了糖基转移酶在植物抗性过程中的研究方法、分类及生物学功能,并对其研究方向加以展望.     

癌相关N2乙酰氨基葡萄糖转移酶研究进展

细胞膜上糖链结构与肿瘤细胞的黏附、入侵及转移密切相关。癌变过程中细胞膜糖链发生异常化 ,而糖基的合成主要是依靠糖基转移酶的作用 ,因此糖基转移酶的研究成为癌变机制研究的课题之一。主要综述了近年来癌相关N 乙酰氨基葡萄糖转移酶 (N acetylglucosaminyl transferase,GnT)V和Ⅲ的表达和调控的研究进展。     

Common origin and evolution of glycosyltransferases using Dol-P-monosaccharides as donor substrate

On the basis of the analysis of 64 glycosyltransferases from 14 species we propose that several successive duplications of a common ancestral gene, followed by divergent evolution, have generated the mannosyltransferases and the glucosyltransferases involved in asparagine-linked glycosylation (ALG) and phosphatidyl-inositol glycan anchor (PIG or GPI), which use lipid-related donor and acceptor substrates. Long and short conserved peptide motifs were found in all enzymes. Conserved and identical amino acid positions were found for the alpha 2/6- and the alpha 3/4-mannosyltransferases and for the alpha 2/3-glucosyltransferases, suggesting unique ancestors for these three superfamilies. The three members of the alpha 2-mannosyltransferase family (ALG9, PIG-B, and SMP3) and the two members of the alpha 3-glucosyltransferase family (ALG6 and ALG8) shared 11 and 30 identical amino acid positions, respectively, suggesting that these enzymes have also originated by duplication and divergent evolution. This model predicts a common genetic origin for ALG and PIG enzymes using dolichyl-phospho-monosaccharide (Dol-P-monosaccharide) donors, which might be related to similar spatial orientation of the hydroxyl acceptors. On the basis of the multiple sequence analysis and the prediction of transmembrane topology we propose that the endoplasmic reticulum glycosyltransferases using Dol-P-monosaccharides as donor substrate have a multispan transmembrane topology with a first large luminal conserved loop containing the long motif and a small cytosolic conserved loop containing the short motif, different from the classical type II glycosyltransferases, which are anchored in the Golgi by a single transmembrane domain.     

Functional States of Homooligomers: Insights from the Evolution of Glycosyltransferases

Glycosylation is an important aspect of epigenetic regulation. Glycosyltransferase is a key enzyme in the biosynthesis of glycans, which glycosylates more than half of all proteins in eukaryotes and is involved in a wide range of biological processes. It has been suggested previously that homooligomerization in glycosyltransferases and other proteins might be crucial for their function. In this study, we explore functional homooligomeric states of glycosyltransferases in various organisms, trace their evolution, and perform comparative analyses to find structural features that can mediate or disrupt the formation of different homooligomers. First, we make a structure-based classification of the diverse superfamily of glycosyltransferases and confirm that the majority of the structures are indeed clustered into the GT-A or GT-B folds. We find that homooligomeric glycosyltransferases appear to be as ancient as monomeric glycosyltransferases and go back in evolution to the last universal common ancestor (LUCA). Moreover, we show that interface residues have significant bias to be gapped out or unaligned in the monomers, implying that they might represent features crucial for oligomer formation. Structural analysis of these features reveals that the majority of them represent loops, terminal regions, and helices, indicating that these secondary-structure elements mediate the formation of glycosyltransferases' homooligomers and directly contribute to the specific binding. We also observe relatively short protein regions that disrupt the homodimer interactions, although such cases are rare. These results suggest that relatively small structural changes in the nonconserved regions may contribute to the formation of different functional oligomeric states and might be important in regulation of enzyme activity through homooligomerization.     

Experimental evolution and genome sequencing reveal variation in levels of clonal interference in large populations of bacteriophage φX174

Background

The first step of GPI anchor biosynthesis is catalyzed by PIG-A, an enzyme that transfers N -acetylglucosamine from UDP- N -acetylglucosamine to phosphatidylinositol. This protein is present in all eukaryotic organisms ranging from protozoa to higher mammals, as part of a larger complex of five to six 'accessory' proteins whose individual roles in the glycosyltransferase reaction are as yet unclear. The PIG-A gene has been shown to be an essential gene in various eukaryotes. In humans, mutations in the protein have been associated with paroxysomal noctural hemoglobuinuria. The corresponding PIG-A gene has also been recently identified in the genome of many archaeabacteria although genes of the accessory proteins have not been discovered in them. The present study explores the evolution of PIG-A and the phylogenetic relationship between this protein and other glycosyltransferases.

Results

In this paper we show that out of the twelve conserved motifs identified by us eleven are exclusively present in PIG-A and, therefore, can be used as markers to identify PIG-A from newly sequenced genomes. Three of these motifs are absent in the primitive eukaryote, G. lamblia. Sequence analyses show that seven of these conserved motifs are present in prokaryote and archaeal counterparts in rudimentary forms and can be used to differentiate PIG-A proteins from glycosyltransferases. Using partial least square regression analysis and data involving presence or absence of motifs in a range of PIG-A and glycosyltransferases we show that (i) PIG-A may have evolved from prokaryotic glycosyltransferases and lipopolysaccharide synthases, members of the GT4 family of glycosyltransferases and (ii) it is possible to uniquely classify PIG-A proteins versus glycosyltransferases.

Conclusion

Besides identifying unique motifs and showing that PIG-A protein from G. lamblia and some putative PIG-A proteins from archaebacteria are evolutionarily closer to glycosyltransferases, these studies provide a new method for identification and classification of PIG-A proteins.     

Synthesis and modifications of carbohydrates, using biotransformations

Enzymes continue to be used as important catalysts, for the generation of rare and 'unnatural' monosaccharides and for the selective formation of glycosidic linkages. Multi-enzyme systems have been employed in one-pot strategies for multistep reaction sequences and for co-factor regeneration. The efficiency of glycosidases for glycosylation reactions has been dramatically increased by active-site mutagenesis to generate glycosynthases. First reports have detailed the expansion and optimization of glycosynthase substrate specificity by directed evolution. Novel glycosyltransferases are being identified from genomic databases and have been shown to glycosylate complex metabolites, such as glycopeptide antibiotics, with exquisite selectivity and in good yields. An emerging field is the application of glycosynthases and glycosyltransferases to reactions on solid support, generating potential applications in microarrays.     

Construction of a library of human glycosyltransferases immobilized in the cell wall of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Fifty-one human glycosyltransferases were expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae as immobilized enzymes and were assayed for enzymatic activities. The stem and catalytic regions of sialyl-, fucosyl-, galactosyl-, N-acetylgalactosaminyl-, and N-acetylglucosaminyltransferases were fused with yeast cell wall Pir proteins, which anchor glycosyltransferases at the yeast cell wall glucan. More than 75% of expressed recombinant glycosyltransferases retained their enzymatic activities in the yeast cell wall fraction and will be used as a human glycosyltransferase library. In increasing the enzymatic activities of immobilized glycosyltransferases, several approaches were found to be effective. Additional expression of yeast protein disulfide isomerase increased the expression levels and activities of polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferases and other glycosyltransferases. PIR3 and/or PIR4 was more effective than PIR1 as a cell wall anchor when the Pir-glycosyltransferase fusions were expressed under the control of the constitutive glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase promoter. Oligosaccharides such as Lewis x, Lewis y, and H antigen were successfully synthesized using this immobilized glycosyltransferase library, indicating that the Pir-fused glycosyltransferases are useful for the production of various human oligosaccharides.     

Construction of a Library of Human Glycosyltransferases Immobilized in the Cell Wall of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Fifty-one human glycosyltransferases were expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae as immobilized enzymes and were assayed for enzymatic activities. The stem and catalytic regions of sialyl-, fucosyl-, galactosyl-, N-acetylgalactosaminyl-, and N-acetylglucosaminyltransferases were fused with yeast cell wall Pir proteins, which anchor glycosyltransferases at the yeast cell wall glucan. More than 75% of expressed recombinant glycosyltransferases retained their enzymatic activities in the yeast cell wall fraction and will be used as a human glycosyltransferase library. In increasing the enzymatic activities of immobilized glycosyltransferases, several approaches were found to be effective. Additional expression of yeast protein disulfide isomerase increased the expression levels and activities of polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferases and other glycosyltransferases. PIR3 and/or PIR4 was more effective than PIR1 as a cell wall anchor when the Pir-glycosyltransferase fusions were expressed under the control of the constitutive glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase promoter. Oligosaccharides such as Lewis x, Lewis y, and H antigen were successfully synthesized using this immobilized glycosyltransferase library, indicating that the Pir-fused glycosyltransferases are useful for the production of various human oligosaccharides.     

Engineering of glycosidases and glycosyltransferases

In recent years, substantial advances have been made in the engineering of glycosidases and glycosyltransferases for the synthesis and degradation of glycan structures. Key developments include improvement of the thermostability of xylanase through comprehensive saturation mutagenesis, creation of the first glycosynthase derived from an inverting glycosidase and the emergence of a new class of modified glycosidases capable of efficiently synthesizing thioglycosidic linkages. Of particular note is the increased use of random mutagenesis and directed evolution tactics for tailoring glycosidase activity. Although the engineering of glycosyltransferases is still in its early stages, recent work on the structure-based alteration of substrate specificity and the manipulation of glycosyltransferase profiles in whole cells to effect complex changes in in vivo glycobiology probably foreshadows a wave of considerable innovation in this area.     

Different glycosyltransferases are differentially processed for secretion, dimerization, and autoglycosylation

Modification of Golgi glycosyltransferases, such as formation of disulfide-bonded dimers and proteolytical release from cells as a soluble form, are important processes to regulate the activity of glycosyltransferases. To better understand these processes, six glycosyltransferases were selected on the basis of the donor sugars, including two N-acetylglucosaminyltransferases, core 1 beta1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase (C1-beta3GnT) and core 2 beta1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase (C2GnT-I); two fucosyltransferases, alpha1,2-fucosyltransferase-I (FucT-I) and alpha1,3-fucosyltransferase-VII (FucT-VII); and two sialyltransferases, alpha2,3-sialyltransferase-I (ST3Gal-I) and alpha2,6-sialyltransferase-I (ST6Gal-I). These enzymes were fused with enhanced green fluorescence protein and stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Spectrofluorimetric detection and immunoblotting analyses showed that all of these glycosyltransferases except FucT-VII were secreted in the medium. By examining dimers formed in cells and culture media, we found that all of the enzymes, except ST3Gal-I, form a combination of monomers and dimers in cells, whereas the molecules released in the media are either exclusively monomers (C2GnT-I and ST6Gal-I), dimers (FucT-I) or a mixture of both (C1-beta3GnT). These results indicate that dimerization does not always lead to Golgi retention. Analysis of the N-glycosylation status of the enzymes revealed that the secreted proteins are generally more heavily N-glycosylated and sialylated than their membrane-associated counterparts, suggesting that the proteolytic cleavage occurs before the glycosylation is completed. Using FucT-I and ST6Gal-I as a model, we also show that these glycosyltransferases are able to perform autoglycosylation in the dimeric forms. These results indicate that different glycosyltranferases differ significantly in dimerization, proteolytic digestion and secretion, and autoglycosylation. These results strongly suggest that disulfide-bonded dimerization and secretion differentially plays a role in the processing and function of different glycosyltransferases in the Golgi apparatus.     

Substrate specificities of family 1 UGTs gained by domain swapping

Family 1 glycosyltransferases are a group of enzymes known to embrace a large range of different substrates. This study devises a method to enhance the range of substrates even further by combining domains from different glycosyltransferases to gain improved substrate specificity and catalytic efficiency. Chimeric glycosyltransferases were made by combining domains from seven different family 1 glycosyltransferases, UGT71C1, UGT71C2, UGT71E1, UGT85C1, UGT85B1, UGT88B1 and UGT94B1. Twenty different chimeric glycosyltransferases were formed of which twelve were shown to be catalytically active. The chimeric enzymes of Arabidopsis thaliana UGT71C1 and UGT71C2 showed major changes in acceptor substrate specificity and were able to glycosylate etoposide significantly better than the parental UGT71C1 and UGT71C2 enzymes, with K_cat and efficiency coefficients 3.0 and 2.6 times higher, respectively. Chimeric glycosyltransferases of UGT71C1 combined with Stevia rebaudiana UGT71E1, also afforded enzymes with high catalytic efficiency, even though the two enzymes only display 38% amino acid sequence identity. These chimeras show a significantly altered regiospecificity towards especially trans-resveratrol, enabling the production of trans-resveratrol-β-4′-O-glucoside (resveratroloside). The study demonstrates that it is possible to obtain improved catalytic properties by combining domains from both closely as well as more distantly related glycosyltransferases. The substrate specificity gained by the chimeras is difficult to predict because factors determining the acceptor specificity reside in the N- terminal as well as the C-terminal domains.     

Conserved domains of glycosyltransferases.

Glycosyltransferases catalyze the synthesis of glycoconjugates by transferring a properly activated sugar residue to an appropriate acceptor molecule or aglycone for chain initiation and elongation. The acceptor can be a lipid, a protein, a heterocyclic compound, or another carbohydrate residue. A catalytic reaction is believed to involve the recognition of both the donor and acceptor by suitable domains, as well as the catalytic site of the enzyme. To elucidate the structural requirements for substrate recognition and catalytic reactions of glycosyltransferases, we have searched the databases for homologous sequences, identified conserved amino acid residues, and proposed potential domain motifs for these enzymes. Depending on the configuration of the anomeric functional group of the glycosyl donor molecule and of the resulting glycoconjugate, all known glycosyltransferases can be divided into two major types: retaining glycosyltransferases, which transfer sugar residue with the retention of anomeric configuration, and inverting glycosyltransferases, which transfer sugar residue with the inversion of anomeric configuration. One conserved domain of the inverting glycosyltransferases identified in the database is responsible for the recognition of a pyrimidine nucleotide, which is either the UDP or the TDP portion of a donor sugar-nucleotide molecule. This domain is termed "Nucleotide Recognition Domain 1 beta," or NRD1 beta, since the type of nucleotide is the only common structure among the sugar donors and acceptors. NRD1 beta is present in 140 glycosyltransferases. The central portion of the NRD1 beta domain is very similar to the domain that is present in one family of retaining glycosyltransferases. This family is termed NRD1 alpha to designate the similarity and stereochemistry of sugar transfer, and it consists of 77 glycosyltransferases identified thus far. In the central portion there is a homologous region for these two families and this region probably has a catalytic function. A third conserved domain is found exclusively in membrane-bound glycosyltransferases and is termed NRD2; this domain is present in 98 glycosyltransferases. All three identified NRDs are present in archaebacterial, eubacterial, viral, and eukaryotic glycosyltransferases. The present article presents the alignment of conserved NRD domains and also presents a brief overview of the analyzed glycosyltransferases which comprise about 65% of all known sugar-nucleotide dependent (Leloir-type) and putative glycosyltransferases in different databases. A potential mechanism for the catalytic reaction is also proposed. This proposed mechanism should facilitate the design of experiments to elucidate the regulatory mechanisms of glycosylation reactions. Amino acid sequence information within the conserved domain may be utilized to design degenerate primers for identifying DNA encoding new glycosyltransferases.