Mismatch Repair

Highly conserved MutS homologs (MSH) and MutL homologs (MLH/PMS) are the fundamental components of mismatch repair (MMR). After decades of debate, it appears clear that the MSH proteins initiate MMR by recognizing a mismatch and forming multiple extremely stable ATP-bound sliding clamps that diffuse without hydrolysis along the adjacent DNA. The function(s) of MLH/PMS proteins is less clear, although they too bind ATP and are targeted to MMR by MSH sliding clamps. Structural analysis combined with recent real-time single molecule and cellular imaging technologies are providing new and detailed insight into the thermal-driven motions that animate the complete MMR mechanism.     

Very Short Patch Mismatch Repair in Phage Lambda: Repair Sites and Length of Repair Tracts

Five amber mutations in the repressor (cI) gene of bacteriophage lambda recombine anomalously with nearby cI mutations. When any of these markers is used in four-factor crosses, cI+ recombinants that are expected to require three cross-overs occur at high frequencies. These recombinants are attributable to very-short-patch (VSP) repair of specific mismatches in DNA heteroduplexes formed during recombination between the markers flanking cI. The sites of the repair-prone mutations and the lengths of repair tracts have now been determined. Amber mutations subject to VSP repair are C to T transitions in 5'CCATGG, the sequence methylated by the product of gene dcm, and also in the related 5'CAGG or 5'CCAG sequences. Ambers arising in CAG sequences found in other contexts, or in codons other than CAG, were not subject to VSP repair. Repair tracts rarely, if ever, exceed ten nucleotides in length, and can be as short as two nucleotides. A repair-prone mutation does not stimulate recombination between flanking cI markers.     

Base Excision Repair

Base excision repair (BER) corrects DNA damage from oxidation, deamination and alkylation. Such base lesions cause little distortion to the DNA helix structure. BER is initiated by a DNA glycosylase that recognizes and removes the damaged base, leaving an abasic site that is further processed by short-patch repair or long-patch repair that largely uses different proteins to complete BER. At least 11 distinct mammalian DNA glycosylases are known, each recognizing a few related lesions, frequently with some overlap in specificities. Impressively, the damaged bases are rapidly identified in a vast excess of normal bases, without a supply of energy. BER protects against cancer, aging, and neurodegeneration and takes place both in nuclei and mitochondria. More recently, an important role of uracil-DNA glycosylase UNG2 in adaptive immunity was revealed. Furthermore, other DNA glycosylases may have important roles in epigenetics, thus expanding the repertoire of BER proteins.Base excision repair (BER) corrects small base lesions that do not significantly distort the DNA helix structure. Such damage typically results from deamination, oxidation, or methylation (Fig. 1). Much of the damage is the result of spontaneous decay of DNA (Lindahl 1993), although similar damage may also be caused by environmental chemicals, radiation, or treatment with cytostatic drugs. BER takes place in nuclei, as well as in mitochondria, largely using different isoforms of proteins or genetically distant proteins. The identification of Escherichia coli uracil-DNA glycosylase (Ung) in 1974 by Tomas Lindahl marks the discovery of BER. Lindahl searched for an enzyme activity that would act on genomic uracil resulting from cytosine deamination. Such an activity was found, but rather unexpectedly, it was not a nuclease. Instead, Lindahl identified an enzyme that cleaved the bond between uracil and deoxyribose. The resulting abasic site (AP-site) was suggested to be further processed by an AP-endonuclease, an exonuclease, a DNA polymerase, and a ligase. Thus, the fundamental steps in the BER pathway were outlined already in the very first paper (Lindahl 1974). Enzymes that cleave the bond between deoxyribose and a modified or mismatched DNA base are now called DNA glycosylases. Collectively these enzymes initiate base excision repair of a large number of base lesions, each recognized by one or a few DNA glycosylases with overlapping specificities.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Chemistry of common base lesions and abasic sites.This relatively brief review focuses on recent advances in the mechanism and function of BER with a focus on mammalian proteins. The current view is that BER is important in relation to cancer, neurodegeneration, and aging (Jeppesen et al. 2011; Wallace et al. 2012). Because of limited space, we have referred to reviews for the majority of results published more than 6–7 years ago. Also, for more detailed analyses of different aspects of BER, the reader is referred to excellent reviews on BER proteins and pathways published in Huffman et al. (2005), Beard and Wilson (2006), Berti and McCann (2006), Cortázar et al. (2007), Kavli et al. (2007), Sousa et al. (2007), Tubbs et al. (2007), Berger et al. (2008), Robertson et al. (2009), Friedman and Stivers (2010), Wilson et al. (2010), Svilar et al. (2011), and Jacobs and Schar (2012).     

Postreplicative Mismatch Repair

The mismatch repair (MMR) system detects non-Watson–Crick base pairs and strand misalignments arising during DNA replication and mediates their removal by catalyzing excision of the mispair-containing tract of nascent DNA and its error-free resynthesis. In this way, MMR improves the fidelity of replication by several orders of magnitude. It also addresses mispairs and strand misalignments arising during recombination and prevents synapses between nonidentical DNA sequences. Unsurprisingly, MMR malfunction brings about genomic instability that leads to cancer in mammals. But MMR proteins have recently been implicated also in other processes of DNA metabolism, such as DNA damage signaling, antibody diversification, and repair of interstrand cross-links and oxidative DNA damage, in which their functions remain to be elucidated. This article reviews the progress in our understanding of the mechanism of replication error repair made during the past decade.The mismatch repair (MMR) system is one of the key guardians of genomic integrity. Its malfunction leads to a substantial increase in spontaneous mutagenesis, illegitimate recombination, and cancer in mammals. MMR improves the fidelity of DNA replication by several orders of magnitude by excising sections of the nascent strand containing mispaired nucleotides. It is likely that MMR has evolved to carry out this function in order to ensure that daughter cells inherit an exact replica of the parental genome. But MMR also controls the fidelity of recombination by removing mispairs from heteroduplexes arising between donor and recipient strands and possibly even rejecting synapses between sequences that are too diverged. Indeed, the existence of MMR was first invoked in the 1960s to explain the unanticipated segregation of genetic markers in fungi and bacteria (for a comprehensive overview of the field, see chapter 12 in Friedberg et al. 1995). During the intervening 50 years, our understanding of MMR has made enormous progress; the main protagonists, as well as many “extras” that participate in this complex process, have been identified, initially in a series of genetic and biochemical experiments and later by sequence homology searches that were made possible by the high degree of evolutionary conservation of MMR. Analysis of the primary sequences of these polypeptides then helped to uncover their enzymatic activities that were confirmed by biochemical and structural studies. In vitro MMR assays using cell extracts and recombinant DNA substrates carrying single mismatches at defined positions led to the discovery of criteria required for efficient, strand-directional MMR. Finally, the Escherichia coli and the minimal human MMR systems could be reconstituted from purified recombinant proteins (Dzantiev et al. 2004). Despite this wealth of knowledge, however, we still lack detailed understanding of the molecular transactions that lead to successful repair of replication errors, and our notion of the role(s) of MMR proteins during recombination is highly speculative.Since the discovery of a link between its malfunction and cancer (for recent reviews, see Wimmer and Etzler 2008; Hewish et al. 2010), MMR has attracted a great deal of attention, and recent progress in our understanding of this pathway has been the subject of several reviews (Stojic et al. 2004; Kunkel and Erie 2005; Iyer et al. 2006; Jiricny 2006; Hsieh and Yamane 2008; Li 2008; George and Alani 2012; Peña-Diaz and Jiricny 2012). This article therefore provides only a brief overview of the MMR process and focuses primarily on the most recent insights into this complex pathway of DNA metabolism.     

DNA Repair Pathways in Trypanosomatids: from DNA Repair to Drug Resistance

SUMMARY

All living organisms are continuously faced with endogenous or exogenous stress conditions affecting genome stability. DNA repair pathways act as a defense mechanism, which is essential to maintain DNA integrity. There is much to learn about the regulation and functions of these mechanisms, not only in human cells but also equally in divergent organisms. In trypanosomatids, DNA repair pathways protect the genome against mutations but also act as an adaptive mechanism to promote drug resistance. In this review, we scrutinize the molecular mechanisms and DNA repair pathways which are conserved in trypanosomatids. The recent advances made by the genome consortiums reveal the complete genomic sequences of several pathogens. Therefore, using bioinformatics and genomic sequences, we analyze the conservation of DNA repair proteins and their key protein motifs in trypanosomatids. We thus present a comprehensive view of DNA repair processes in trypanosomatids at the crossroads of DNA repair and drug resistance.     

Alternative Excision Repair Pathways

Alternative excision repair (AER) is a category of excision repair initiated by a single nick, made by an endonuclease, near the site of DNA damage, and followed by excision of the damaged DNA, repair synthesis, and ligation. The ultraviolet (UV) damage endonuclease in fungi and bacteria introduces a nick immediately 5′ to various types of UV damage and initiates its excision repair that is independent of nucleotide excision repair (NER). Endo IV-type apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonucleases from Escherichia coli and yeast and human Exo III-type AP endonuclease APEX1 introduce a nick directly and immediately 5′ to various types of oxidative base damage besides the AP site, initiating excision repair. Another endonuclease, endonuclease V from bacteria to humans, binds deaminated bases and cleaves the phosphodiester bond located 1 nucleotide 3′ of the base, leading to excision repair. A single-strand break in DNA is one of the most frequent types of DNA damage within cells and is repaired efficiently. AER makes use of such repair capability of single-strand breaks, removes DNA damage, and has an important role in complementing BER and NER.NER and base excision repair (BER) are the major excision repair pathways present in almost all organisms. In NER, dual incisions are introduced, the damaged DNA between the incised sites is then removed, and DNA synthesis fills the single-stranded gap, followed by ligation. In BER, an AP site, formed by depurination or created by a base damage-specific DNA glycosylase, is recognized by an AP endonuclease that introduces a nick immediately 5′ to the AP site, followed by repair synthesis, removal of the AP site, and final ligation. Besides these two fundamental excision repair systems, investigators have found another category of excision repair—AER—an example of which is the excision repair of UV damage, initiated by an endonuclease called UV damage endonuclease (UVDE). UVDE introduces a single nick immediately 5′ to various types of UV lesions as well as other types of base damage, and this nick leads to the removal of the lesions by an AER process designated as UVDE-mediated excision repair (UVER or UVDR). Genetic analysis in Schizosaccharomyces pombe indicates that UVER provides cells with an extremely rapid removal of UV lesions, which is important for cells exposed to UV in their growing phase.Endo IV–type AP endonucleases from Escherichia coli and budding yeast and the Exo III–type human AP endonuclease APEX1 are able to introduce a nick at various types of oxidative base damage and initiate a form of excision repair that has been designated as nucleotide incision repair (NIR). Endonuclease V (ENDOV) from bacteria to humans recognizes deaminated bases, introduces a nick 1 nucleotide 3′ of the base, and leads to excision repair initiated by the nick. These endonucleases introduce a single nick near the DNA-damage site, leaving 3′-OH termini, and initiate repair of both the DNA damage and the nick. The mechanisms of AER may be similar to those of single-strand break (SSB) repair or BER except for the initial nicking process. However, how DNA damage is recognized determines the repair process within the cell. This article discusses the mechanisms and functional roles of AER. We begin with AER of UV damage, because genetic analysis has shown functional differences between this AER and NER in S. pombe.     

Mitochondrial DNA Repair Pathways

It has long been held that there is no DNA repair in mitochondria. Early observations suggestedthat the reason for the observed accumulation of DNA damage in mitochondrial DNA is thatDNA lesions are not removed. This is in contrast to the very efficient repair that is seen inthe nuclear DNA. Mitochondrial DNA does not code for any DNA repair proteins, but it hasbeen observed that a number of repair factors can be found in mitochondrial extracts. Mostof these participate in the base excision DNA repair pathway which is responsible for theremoval of simple lesions in DNA. Recent work has shown that there is efficient base excisionrepair in mammalian mitochondria and there are also indications of the presence of morecomplex repair processes. Thus, an active field of mitochondrial DNA repair is emerging. Anunderstanding of the DNA repair processes in mammalian mitochondria is an important currentchallenge and it is likely to lead to clarification of the etiology of the common mutations anddeletions that are found in mitochondria, and which are thought to cause various humandisorders and to play a role in the aging phenotype.