Independent positioning and action of Escherichia coli replisomes in live cells

A prevalent view of DNA replication has been that it is carried out in fixed "replication factories." By tracking the progression of sister replication forks with respect to genetic loci in live Escherichia coli, we show that at initiation replisomes assemble at replication origins irrespective of where the origins are positioned within the cell. Sister replisomes separate and move to opposite cell halves shortly after initiation, migrating outwards as replication proceeds and both returning to midcell as replication termination approaches. DNA polymerase is maintained at stalled replication forks, and over short intervals of time replisomes are more dynamic than genetic loci. The data are inconsistent with models in which replisomes associated with sister forks act within a fixed replication factory. We conclude that independent replication forks follow the path of the compacted chromosomal DNA, with no structure other than DNA anchoring the replisome to any particular cellular region.     

Sister chromatid interactions in bacteria revealed by a site-specific recombination assay

The process of Sister Chromosome Cohesion (SCC), which holds together sister chromatids upon replication, is essential for chromosome segregation and DNA repair in eukaryotic cells. Although cohesion at the molecular level has never been described in E. coli, previous studies have reported that sister sequences remain co-localized for a period after their replication. Here, we have developed a new genetic recombination assay that probes the ability of newly replicated chromosome loci to interact physically. We show that Sister Chromatid Interaction (SCI) occurs exclusively within a limited time frame after replication. Importantly, we could differentiate sister cohesion and co-localization since factors such as MatP and MukB that reduced the co-localization of markers had no effect on molecular cohesion. The frequency of sister chromatid interactions were modulated by the activity of Topo-IV, revealing that DNA topology modulates cohesion at the molecular scale in bacteria.     

Epigenetic differences between sister chromatids?

Semi-conservative replication ensures that the DNA sequence of sister chromatids is identical except for replication errors and variation in the length of telomere repeats resulting from replicative losses and variable end processing. What happens with the various epigenetic marks during DNA replication is less clear. Many chromatin marks are likely to be copied onto both sister chromatids in conjunction with DNA replication, whereas others could be distributed randomly between sister chromatids. Epigenetic differences between sister chromatids could also emerge in a more predictable manner, for example, following processes that are associated with lagging strand DNA replication. The resulting epigenetic differences between sister chromatids could result in different gene expression patterns in daughter cells. This possibility has been difficult to test because techniques to distinguish between parental sister chromatids require analysis of single cells and are not obvious. Here, we briefly review the topic of sister chromatid epigenetics and discuss how the identification of sister chromatids in cells could change the way we think about asymmetric cell divisions and stochastic variation in gene expression between cells in general and paired daughter cells in particular.     

Competence for assembly of sister chromatid cores is progressively acquired during S phase in mammalian cells.

Condensed sister chromatids possess a protein scaffold or axial core to which loops of chromatin are attached. The sister cores are believed to be dynamic frameworks that function in the organization and condensation of chromatids. Chromosome structural proteins are implicated in the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion and in the maintenance of epigenetic phenomena. Both processes of templating are tightly linked to DNA replication itself. It is a question whether the structural basis of sister chromatid cores is templated during S phase. As cells proceed through the cell cycle, chromatid cores undergo changes in their protein composition. Cytologically, cores are first visualized at the start of prometaphase. Still, core assembly can be induced in G1 and G2 when interphase cells are fused with mitotic cells. In this study, we asked if chromatid cores are similarly able to assemble in S-phase cells. We find that the ability to assemble cores is transiently lost during local replication, then regained in chromosome regions shortly after they have been replicated. We propose that core templating occurs coincident with DNA replication and that the competence for the assembly of the sister chromatid cores is acquired shortly after passage of replication forks.     

Sister Chromatid Cohesion

During S phase, not only does DNA have to be replicated, but also newly synthesized DNA molecules have to be connected with each other. This sister chromatid cohesion is essential for the biorientation of chromosomes on the mitotic or meiotic spindle, and is thus an essential prerequisite for chromosome segregation. Cohesion is mediated by cohesin complexes that are thought to embrace sister chromatids as large rings. Cohesin binds to DNA dynamically before DNA replication and is converted into a stably DNA-bound form during replication. This conversion requires acetylation of cohesin, which in vertebrates leads to recruitment of sororin. Sororin antagonizes Wapl, a protein that is able to release cohesin from DNA, presumably by opening the cohesin ring. Inhibition of Wapl by sororin therefore “locks” cohesin rings on DNA and allows them to maintain cohesion for long periods of time in mammalian oocytes, possibly for months or even years.DNA replication during the synthesis (S) phase generates identical DNA molecules, which, in their chromatinized form, are called sister chromatids. The pairs of sister chromatids remain united as part of one chromosome during the subsequent gap (G₂) phase and during early mitosis, in prophase, prometaphase, and metaphase. During these stages of mitosis chromosomes condense, in most eukaryotes the nuclear envelope breaks down, and in all species chromosomes are ultimately attached to both poles of the mitotic spindle. Only once this biorientation has been achieved for all chromosomes, the sister chromatids are separated from each other in anaphase and transported toward opposite spindle poles of the mother cell, enabling its subsequent division into two genetically identical daughter cells.This series of events critically depends on the fact that sister chromatids remain physically connected with each other from S phase until metaphase. This physical connection, called sister chromatid cohesion, opposes the pulling forces that are generated by microtubules that attach to kinetochores and thereby enables the biorientation of chromosomes on the mitotic spindle (Tanaka et al. 2000b). Without cohesion, sister chromatids could therefore not be segregated symmetrically between the forming daughter cells, resulting in aneuploidy. For the same reasons, cohesion is essential for chromosome segregation in meiosis I and meiosis II. Cohesion defects in human oocytes can lead to aneuploidy, which is thought to be the major cause of spontaneous abortion, because only a few types of aneuploidy are compatible with viability, such as trisomy 21 (Down syndrome), trisomy 18 (Edwards syndrome), and trisomy 13 (Patau syndrome) (Hunt and Hassold 2010). Studying the mechanisms of cohesion is therefore essential for understanding how the genome is passed properly from one cell generation to the next.In addition, sister chromatid cohesion facilitates the repair of DNA double-strand breaks in cells that have replicated their DNA, where such breaks can be repaired by a homologous recombination mechanism that uses the undamaged sister chromatid as a template (for review, see Watrin et al. 2006). Furthermore, mutations in the proteins that are required for sister chromatid cohesion can cause defects in chromatin structure and gene regulation, and can in rare cases lead to congenital developmental disorders, called Cornelia de Lange syndrome, Roberts/SC Phocomelia syndrome, and Warsaw Breakage syndrome (for review, see Mannini et al. 2010).     

Sister chromatid cohesion is required for postreplicative double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The repair of DNA double-strand breaks by recombination requires the presence of an undamaged copy that is used as a template during the repair process. Because cells acquire resistance to gamma irradiation during DNA replication and because sister chromatids are the preferred partner for double-strand break repair in mitotic diploid yeast cells, it has long been suspected that cohesion between sister chromatids might be crucial for efficient repair. This hypothesis is consistent with the sensitivity to gamma irradiation of mutants defective in the cohesin complex that holds sister chromatids together from DNA replication until the onset of anaphase (reviewed in) . It is also in accordance with the finding that surveillance mechanisms (checkpoints) that sense DNA damage arrest cell cycle progression in yeast by causing stabilization of the securin Pds1, thereby blocking sister chromatid separation. The hypersensitivity to irradiation of cohesin mutants could, however, be due to a more direct involvement of the cohesin complex in the process of DNA repair. We show here that passage through S phase in the presence of cohesin, and not cohesin per se, is essential for efficient double-strand break repair during G2 in yeast. Proteins needed to load cohesin onto chromosomes (Scc2) and to generate cohesion during S phase (Eco1) are also shown to be required for repair. Our results confirm what has long been suspected but never proven, that cohesion between sister chromatids is essential for efficient double-strand break repair in mitotic cells.     

Chromosome cohesion: a polymerase for chromosome bridges

How do cells ensure that sister chromatids produced during DNA replication stay connected with each other until their separation in anaphase? New insight is provided by the discovery of DNA polymerase kappa, which has been found to be required for building the connections between sister chromatids.     

Replication-Dependent Sister Chromatid Recombination in Rad1 Mutants of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Homolog recombination and unequal sister chromatid recombination were monitored in rad1-1/rad1-1 diploid yeast cells deficient for excision repair, and in control cells, RAD1/rad1-1, after exposure to UV irradiation. In a rad1-1/rad1-1 diploid, UV irradiation stimulated much more sister chromatid recombination relative to homolog recombination when cells were irradiated in the G(1) or the G(2) phases of the cell cycle than was observed in RAD1/rad1-1 cells. Since sister chromatids are not present during G(1), this result suggested that unexcised lesions can stimulate sister chromatid recombination events during or subsequent to DNA replication. The results of mating rescue experiments suggest that unexcised UV dimers do not stimulate sister chromatid recombination during the G(2) phase, but only when they are present during DNA replication. We propose that there are two types of sister chromatid recombination in yeast. In the first type, unexcised UV dimers and other bulky lesions induce sister chromatid recombination during DNA replication as a mechanism to bypass lesions obstructing the passage of DNA polymerase, and this type is analogous to the type of sister chromatid exchange commonly observed cytologically in mammalian cells. In the second type, strand scissions created by X-irradiation or the excision of damaged bases create recombinogenic sites that result in sister chromatid recombination directly in G(2). Further support for the existence of two types of sister chromatid recombination is the fact that events induced in rad1-1/rad1-1 were due almost entirely to gene conversion, whereas those in RAD1/rad1-1 cells were due to a mixture of gene conversion and reciprocal recombination.     

Condensin aids sister chromatid decatenation by topoisomerase II

The condensin complex is a key determinant of mitotic chromosome architecture. In addition, condensin promotes resolution of sister chromatids during anaphase, a function that is conserved from prokaryotes to human. Anaphase bridges observed in cells lacking condensin are reminiscent of chromosome segregation failure after inactivation of topoisomerase II (topo II), the enzyme that removes catenanes persisting between sister chromatids following DNA replication. Circumstantial evidence has linked condensin to sister chromatid decatenation but, because of the difficulty of observing chromosome catenation, this link has remained indirect. Alternative models for how condensin facilitates chromosome resolution have been put forward. Here, we follow the catenation status of circular minichromosomes of three sizes during the Saccharomyeces cerevisiae cell cycle. Catenanes are produced during DNA replication and are for the most part swiftly resolved during and following S-phase, aided by sister chromatid separation. Complete resolution, however, requires the condensin complex, a dependency that becomes more pronounced with increasing chromosome size. Our results provide evidence that condensin prevents deleterious anaphase bridges during chromosome segregation by promoting sister chromatid decatenation.     

Mutation fixation in MNNG-treated Haemophilus influenzae as determined by transformation

A transformation assay has been used to follow the fixation of mutations to novobiocin resistance induced by N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) in Haemophilus influenzae. Very few mutations are produced by recently treated DNA, but many are produced by the DNA from cells that have been incubated for a time after exposure to MNNG. The time course of this mutation fixation is shown to coincide reasonably well with the time course of semiconservative DNA synthesis, as judged by uptake studies and by isopycnic centrifugation of density-labeled cells. Incubation with bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) during the fixation period decreases the number of mutations that are fixed, showing in another way the importance of DNA synthesis for fixation.Mutations fixed in the presence of BrdUrd are not more sensitive to 313-nm radiation than those fixed in its absence, suggesting that these residual mutations are fixed in the absence of extensive DNA replication. Mutations newly fixed in the absence of BrdUrd are much more sensitive to 313-nm radiation than are the same mutations some cell generations later. This shows that the newly fixed mutations are in a state that is different from their final form, either because they are in regions of DNA with special configurations of the strands or because they are in a region of DNA that is a hybrid between an old, alkylated strand and a new strand with some bases different from normal. The data suggest that it is unlikely that anything like all the mutations that are fixed in H. influenzae arise by direct action of MNNG on the replication fork. Many of the results can be explained in terms of fixation during semiconservative replication of premutational lesions, some of which are initially located some distance from the replication fork. The final yield would then depend on the relative rates of removal of the lesions by repair and of fixation by replication.     

ATR contributes to telomere maintenance in human cells

Telomere maintenance is essential to preserve genomic stability and involves several telomere-specific proteins as well as DNA replication and repair proteins. The kinase ATR, which has a crucial function in maintaining genome integrity from yeast to human, has been shown to be involved in telomere maintenance in several eukaryotic organisms, including yeast, Arabidopsis and Drosophila. However, its role in telomere maintenance in mammals remains poorly explored. Here, we report by using telomere-fluorescence in situ hybridization (Telo-FISH) on metaphase chromosomes that ATR deficiency causes telomere instability both in primary human fibroblasts from Seckel syndrome patients and in HeLa cells. The telomere aberrations resulting from ATR deficiency (i.e. sister telomere fusions and chromatid-type telomere aberrations) are mainly generated during and/or after telomere replication, and involve both leading and lagging strand telomeres as shown by chromosome orientation-FISH (CO-FISH). Moreover, we show that ATR deficiency strongly sensitizes cells to the G-quadruplex ligand 360A, enhancing sister telomere fusions and chromatid-type telomere aberrations involving specifically the lagging strand telomeres. Altogether, these data reveal that ATR plays a critical role in telomere maintenance during and/or after telomere replication in human cells.     

Sister chromosome cohesion of Escherichia coli

We analysed Escherichia coli cells synchronized for initiation of chromosomal DNA replication by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using fluorescent DNA probes corresponding to various chromosomal regions. Sister copies of regions in an approximately oriC-proximal half of the chromosome are cohesive with each other after replication until the late period of chromosome replication. Sister copies of regions relatively close to the terminus are also separated from each other in the same late period of replication. It is important that sister copies in all the tested regions are thus separated from each other nearly all at once in the late period of chromosome replication. These results are consistent with results obtained by FISH in randomly growing cultures. Cohesion of sister copies in an oriC-close region is observed in a dam null mutant lacking DNA adenine methyltransferase the same as in the parental isogenic dam+ strain, indicating that the cohesion is independent of DNA adenine methyltransferase. This further implies that hemimethylated DNA-binding proteins, such as SeqA, are not involved in the cohesion. On the other hand, the cohesion of sister copies of the oriC-close region was not observed in mukB null mutant cells, suggesting that MukB might be involved in the chromosome cohesion.     

Chromosome segregation

The ability to visualise specific genes and proteins within bacterial cells is revolutionising knowledge of chromosome segregation. The essential elements appear to be the driving force behind DNA replication, which occurs at fixed cellular positions, the condensation of newly replicated DNA by a chromosome condensation machine located at the cell 1/4 and 3/4 positions, and molecular machines that act at midcell to allow chromosome separation after replication and movement of the sister chromosomes away from the division septum prior to cell division. This review attempts to provide a perspective on current views of the bacterial chromosome segregation mechanism and how it relates to other cellular processes.     

DNA replication in soybean protoplasts and suspension-cultured cells: Comparison of exponential and fluorodeoxyuridine synchronized cultures

Cell-suspension cultures of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr., line SB-1) have been used to study DNA replication. Cells or protoplasts incorporate either radioactive thymidine or 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR) into DNA. The DNA has been extracted as large molecules which can be visualized by autoradiography. Nuclei were isolated and lysed on slides thus avoiding degradation of DNA by a cytoplasmic endonuclease. The autoradiograms demonstrated that DNA synthesis occurs at several sites tandemly arranged on single DNA molecules separated by center to center distances ranging from 10 to 30 m. Velocity sedimentations through alkaline gradients confirm the lengths of the replicated regions seen in autoradiograms. By using velocity sedimentation it also has been possible to demonstrate that replication proceeds by the synthesis of very small (4–6S) DNA intermediates which join to form the larger, replicon-size pieces seen in autoradiograms. Both small (4–6S) and large (20–30S) intermediates are observed in synchronized and exponential cultures. However, after synchronization with fluorodeoxyuridine (FUdR) the rate of DNA synthesis is reduced. Since the size of intermediates is not reduced by FUdR treatment, it is concluded that the slower rate of replication results from a reduction in the number of tandem replication units but not in the rate at which they are elongated. After FUdR treatment, the density analogue of thymidine, BUdR, can be substituted for almost all of the thymidine residue in DNA, resulting in a buoyant density increase (in CsCl) from 1.694 to 1.747 g/cm³. Using this density analogue it is possible to estimate the amount of template DNA attached to new replication sites. When this is done, it can be shown that synchronized cells initiate replication at about 5,000 different sites at the beginning of S. (Each such site will replicate to an average length of 20 m.) Use of BUdR also substantiates that at early stages of replication, very small replicated regions (<8S) exist which are separated by unreplicated segments of DNA which replicate at a later time. Most of these conclusions agree with the pattern of DNA replication established for animal cells. However, a major difference appears to be that after prolonged inhibition of soybean cell replication with FUdR, very small, as well as replicon-size intermediates accumulate when replication is restored. This indicates that regulation of replication in these cells may be different from animal cells.Abbreviations BUdR 5-Bromodeoxyuridine - FUdR 5-Fluorodeoxyuridine     

From a single double helix to paired double helices and back

The propagation of our genomes during cell proliferation depends on the movement of sister DNA molecules produced by DNA replication to opposite sides of the cell before it divides. This feat is achieved by microtubules in eukaryotic cells but it has long remained a mystery how cells ensure that sister DNAs attach to microtubules with opposite orientations, known as amphitelic attachment. It is currently thought that sister chromatid cohesion has a crucial role. By resisting the forces exerted by microtubules, sister chromatid cohesion gives rise to tension that is thought essential for stabilizing kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Efficient amphitelic attachment is therefore achieved by an error correction mechanism that selectively eliminates connections that do not give rise to tension. Cohesion between sister chromatids is mediated by a multisubunit complex called cohesin which forms a gigantic ring structure. It has been proposed that sister DNAs are held together owing to their becoming entrapped within a single cohesin ring. Cohesion between sister chromatids is destroyed at the metaphase to anaphase transition by proteolytic cleavage of cohesin's Scc1 subunit by a thiol protease called separase, which severs the ring and thereby releases sister DNAs.     

In vivo BrdU-33258 Hoechst analysis of DNA replication kinetics and sister chromatid exchange formation in mouse somatic and meiotic cells

BrdU (5-bromodeoxyuridine)-33258 Hoechst methods have been adapted for in vivo analyses of replication kinetics, sister chromatid differentiation and sister chromatid exchange (SCE) formation in mice. Sufficient in vivo BrdU substitution for cytological detection was effected with multiple intraperitoneal injections of the analogue. The combination of centromere staining asymmetry and sister chromatid differentiation at metaphase permits unambiguous determination of the number of replications in BrdU and dT (deoxythymidine) undergone by individual cells. Late-replicating regions in marrow and spermatogonial chromosomes are highlighted by bright fluorescence after sequential incorporation of BrdU followed by dT during a single DNA synthesis period. SCEs are analyzed in marrow and spermatogonial metaphases after successive complete cycles of BrdU and dT incorporation. Significant induction of SCE was observed with both mitomycin C and cyclophosphamide; the latter drug requires host-mediated activation to be effective. In meiotic metaphase cells harvested two weeks after BrdU incorporation, satellite DNA asymmetry, sister chromatid differentiation and SCE could be detected in a few chromosomes, most frequently the X and the Y.     

Setting the stage for cohesion establishment by the replication fork

Comment on: Rudra S, et al. Cell Cycle 2012; 2114-21The complex process of semi-conservative DNA replication involves a mechanism whereby the leading and lagging strands with opposite polarity serve as templates for concerted synthesis of complementary base pairs.¹ Lagging-strand synthesis creates discontinuous Okazaki fragments that require timely processing of the 5′ flaps, so that adjacent nascent DNA strands are ligated together to insure genomic stability. While the genetic and molecular requirements of Okazaki fragment maturation have been studied in much detail, the precise temporal and spatial relationship of lagging-strand processing to sister chromatid cohesion remains unclear.² The newly replicated daughter duplex DNA molecules (i.e., the sister chromatids) become tethered during DNA replication and remain paired in order to permit proper segregation of the chromosomes to respective poles during mitosis and nuclear division. Elegant genetic studies in yeast have implicated posttranslational modification of cohesins (specialized protein complexes responsible for tethering sister pairs) by Ctf7/Eco1 acetylase as a key regulatory step in the process, enabling cohesins to perform their function in capturing the newly synthesized sister chromatids. Previous work suggested that genetic and physical interactions among the yeast acetyltransferase Ctf7/Eco1, helicase Chl1, Flap Endonuclease (Fen1) and accessory replication factors [e.g., RFC (clamp loader) and PCNA (clamp)] play an integral role in cohesion establishment. Based on these pieces of evidence, several models to explain the relationship between replication fork dynamics and sister chromatid cohesion have been proposed; however, our understanding of the precise timing of cohesin acetylation and the passage of the replication fork machinery has remained murky at best. Given the importance of proper chromosome segregation for chromosomal stability and the suppression of developmental disorders and tumorigenesis, a comprehensive understanding of the molecular acrobatics involved in sister chromatid cohesion is highly important.In a recent study, the temporal relationship between sister chromatid establishment and lagging-strand synthesis was illuminated.³ The authors have elucidated the link between the catalytic functions of DNA unwinding, flap processing and acetylation, which supports a model of cohesion deposition and establishment that occurs after the passage of the replication fork, similar to how genomic DNA becomes chromatinized. This is a significant advance from an earlier and very popular model of sister chromatid cohesion predicted that Ctf7/Eco1 acetylated cohesin proteins before the encounter by the DNA replication fork, which was thought to permit fork progression and the proper cohesion state for sister chromatid tethering (for review, see ref. ²). Instead, the genetic evidence presented by the Skibbens lab supports a model whereby cohesion establishment is temporally coupled to lagging-strand processing.³ In support of the genetic proof, Rudra and Skibbens went on to show that both Ctf7/Eco1 and Chl1 are associated with the lagging-strand processing nuclease Fen1. Altogether, the experimental results implicate a post-fork establishment model that is analogous to how histone protein complexes are deposited onto newly synthesized sister chromatids and become posttranslationally modified to confer epigenetic status.The discovery from the Skibbens lab that cohesion establishment is closely orchestrated with Okazaki fragment processing prompts a new line of inquiry about the control of flap processing by acetylation and its dual purpose for proper sister chromatid cohesion and replication fidelity in eukaryotes (Fig. 1). The catalytic activity of human FEN-1^4,5 and a functionally related endonuclease known as Dna2⁴ have been shown to be modulated by p300 acetylation, which suggested a model for creating long flap intermediates to promote genomic stability and suppress mutagenesis. Given evidence that ChlR1 is implicated in the genetic disorder Warsaw Breakage syndrome and that the human homolog of yeast Chl1⁶ interacts with the RFC complex and Fen1,⁷ it will be informative to determine if acetyltransferases such as the human orthologs Esco1 and Esco2, the latter mutated in the cohesinopathy Roberts syndrome,⁸ and perhaps other acetyltransferases (e.g., p300) are master regulators of lagging-strand synthesis that not only affect replication fidelity and genomic stability, but also sister chromatid cohesion. Coordination of sister chromatid cohesion establishment with lagging strand synthesis may also involve replication fork stabilization by the Timeless-Tipin protein complex implicated in replication checkpoint.⁹ Defects in the efficient coupling of lagging-strand synthesis to sister chromatid cohesion may contribute to the chromosomal instability characteristic of age-related diseases and cancer.Open in a separate windowFigure 1. Interplay between acetylation, replication fork dynamics and cohesion establishment important for chromosomal integrity.     

A fixed distance for separation of newly replicated copies of oriC in Bacillus subtilis: implications for co-ordination of chromosome segregation and cell division

The Spo0J protein of Bacillus subtilis is required for normal chromosome segregation and forms discrete subcellular assemblies closely associated with the oriC region of the chromosome. Here we show that duplication of Spo0J foci occurs early in the DNA replication cycle and that this requires the initiation of DNA replication at oriC but not elongation beyond the nearby STer sites. Soon after duplication, sister oriC /Spo0J foci move rapidly apart to achieve a fixed separation of about 0.7 μm, reminiscent of the segregation of eukaryotic chromosomes on the mitotic spindle. The magnitude of the fixed separation distance may explain how chromosome segregation is kept in close register with cell growth and the initiation mass for DNA replication. It could also explain how segregation can proceed accurately in the absence of cell division. The kinetics of focal separation suggest that one role of Spo0J protein may be to facilitate formation of separate sister oriC complexes that can be segregated.     

Regulation of DNA replication on subchromosomal units of mammalian cells

The regulation of DNA replication at a subchromosomal level in mammalian cells has been investigated. DNA fiber autoradiographs were prepared from mouse L-929 cells pulse labeled with (3H)thymidine. Initiation events and subsequent chain growth occurring over short stretches (up to three replication units in length) of chromosomal DNA were analyzed. The results show that adjacent units usually initiate replication synchronously and that this synchrony is related to the proximity of initiation sites. In addition, adjacent units are of similar size and the rates of replication fork progression within units and on adjacent units are similar. The rate of fork progression increases with increasing replication unit size. Finally, no evidence for fixed termination sites for the units has been found. These observations suggest that despite large variations in size of replication units, timing of initiation events, and rates of fork progression found in chromosomal DNA as a whole, these processes are closely regulated within subchromosomal clusters of active replication units.