The linear oxidation of formaldehyde to CO2 as the proper energy generating sequence for the assimilation of methanol in Acetobacter methanolicus MB58

Acetobacter methanolicus MB58 can grow on methanol. Since this substrate exhibits to be energy deficient there must be a chance to oxidize methanol to CO₂ merely for purpose of energy generation. For the assimilation of methanol the FBP variant of the RuMP pathway is used. Hence methanol can be oxidized cyclically via 6-phosphogluconate. Since Acetobacter methanolicus MB58 possesses all enzymes for a linear oxidation via formate the question arises which of both sequences is responsible for generation of the energy required. In order to clarify this the linear sequence was blocked by inhibiting the formate dehydrogenase with hypophosphite and by mutagenesis inducing mutants defective in formaldehyde or formate dehydrogenase. It has been shown that the linear dissimilatory sequence is indispensable for methylotrophic growth. Although the cyclic oxidation of formaldehyde to CO₂ has not been influenced by hypophosphite and with mutants both the wild type and the formaldehyde dehydrogenase defect mutants cannot grown on methanol. The cyclic oxidation of formaldehyde does not seem to be coupled to a sufficient energy generation, probably it operates only detoxifying and provides reducing equivalents for syntheses. The regulation between assimilation and dissimilation of formaldehyde in Acetobacter methanolicus MB58 is discussed.Abbreviations ATP Adenosine-5-triphosphate - DCPIP 2,6-dichlorphenolindophenol - DW dry weight - ETP electron transport phosphorylation - FBP fructose-1,6-bisphosphate - MNNG N-methyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine - PMS phenazine methosulfate - RuMP ribulose monophosphate - Ru5P ribulose-5-phosphate - SDS sodiumdodecylsulphate - TCA tricarboxylic acid - TYB toluylene blue Dedicated to Prof. Dr. Dr. S. M. Rapoport on occasion of his 75th birthday     

Thermodynamic aspects of energy conservation by chemolithotrophic sulfur bacteria in relation to the sulfur oxidation pathways

The free-energy data on which assessments of the autotrophic growth efficiencies of chemolithotrophic bacteria are commonly based have been reevaluated and new values have been calculated. It has been concluded that many earlier calculations are in error and that many values previously reported in the literature are overestimates of efficiency. A problem posed by the chemolithotrophic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria is the elucidation of the mechanism by which elemental sulfur and the sulfane-sulfur (-S-) of the thionic acids are converted to sulfite. Even after decades of studies on sulfur oxidation by these bacteria, this problem has not been fully resolved although it is widely thought that conversion of sulfur to sulfite is brought about by an oxygenase. The biochemically feasible mechanisms by which sulfur and “sulfane” oxidation to sulfite might occur are reviewed. The possible insight afforded by chemical thermodynamics into the most likely mechanisms for oxidation to sulfate in relation to the efficiency of energy conservation is discussed. Energetic calculations and growth yield data indicate that the energy-yielding oxidation of sulfur and “sulfane” to sulfite, either coupled to energy-conserving electron transport or catalyzed by an oxygenase, could explain divergent growth yields among different sulfur-chemolithotrophs. Received: 30 October 1998 / Accepted: 25 January 1999     

Acetate oxidation to CO2 in anaerobic bacteria via a novel pathway not involving reactions of the citric acid cycle

In several sulfate-reducing bacteria capable of complete oxidation of acetate (or acetyl CoA), the citric acid cycle is not operative. No 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase activity was found in these organisms, and the labelling pattern of oxaloacetate excludes its synthesis via 2-oxo-glutarate. These sulfate-reducers contained, however, high activities of the enzymes carbon monoxide dehydrogenase and formate dehydrogenase and catalyzed an isotope exchange between CO₂ and the carboxyl group of acetate (or acetyl CoA), showing a direct C-C-cleavage of activated acetic acid. These findings suggest that in the investigated sulfate-reducers acetate is oxidized to CO₂ via C₁ intermediates. The proposed pathway provides a possible explanation for the reported different fluoroacetate sensitivity of acetate oxidation by anaerobic bacteria, for mini-methane formation, as well as for the postulated anaerobic methane oxidation by special sulfate-reducers.