Induction and axial patterning of the neural plate: Planar and vertical signals

In this review I summarize recent findings on the contributions of different cell groups to the formation of the basic plan of the nervous system of vertebrate embryos. Midline cells of the mesoderm—the organizer, notochord, and prechordal plate—and midline cells of the neural ectoderm—the notoplate and floor plate—appear to have a fundamental role in the induction and patterning of the neural plate. Vertical signals acting across tissue layers and planar signals acting through the neural epithelium have distinct roles and cooperate in induction and pattern formation. Whereas the prechordal plate and notochord have distinct vertical signaling properties, the initial anteroposterior (A-P) pattern of the neural plate may be induced by planar signals originating from the organizer region. Planar signals from the notoplate may also contribute to the mediolateral (M-L) patterning of the neural plate. These and other findings suggest a general view of neural induction and axial patterning. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Planar and vertical induction of anteroposterior pattern during the development of the amphibian central nervous system

In amphibians and other vertebrates, neural development is induced in the ectoderm by signals coming from the dorsal mesoderm during gastrulation. Classical embryological results indicated that these signals follow a “vertical” path, from the involuted dorsal mesoderm to the overlying ectoderm. Recent work with the frog Xenopus laevis, however, has revealed the existence of “planar” neural-inducing signals, which pass within the continuous sheet or plane of tissue formed by the dorsal mesoderm and presumptive neurectoderm. Much of this work has made use of Keller explants, in which dorsal mesoderm and ectoderm are cultured in a planar configuration with contact along only a single edge, and vertical contact is prevented. Planar signals can induce the full anteroposterior (A-P) extent of neural pattern, as evidenced in Keller explants by the expression of genes that mark specific positions along the A-P axis. In this review, classical and modern molecular work on vertical and planar inductionwill be discussed. This will be followed by a discussion of various models for vertical induction and planar induction. It has been proposed that the A-P pattern in the nervous system is derived from a parallel pattern of inducers in the dorsal mesoderm which is “imprinted” vertically onto the overlying ectoderm. Since it is now known that planar signals can also induce A-P neural pattern, this kind of model must be reassessed. The study of planar induction of A-P pattern in Xenopus embryos provides a simple, manipulable, two-dimensional system in which to investigate pattern formation. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Neural expression of the Xenopus homeobox gene Xhox3: evidence for a patterning neural signal that spreads through the ectoderm

The Xenopus laevis homeobox gene Xhox3 is expressed in the axial mesoderm of gastrula and neurula stage embryos. By the late neurula-early tailbud stage, mesodermal expression is no longer detectable and expression appears in the growing tailbud and in neural tissue. In situ hybridization analysis of the expression of Xhox3 in neural tissue shows that it is restricted within the neural tube and the cranial neural crest during the tailbud-early tadpole stages. In late tadpole stages, Xhox3 is only expressed in the mid/hindbrain area and can therefore be considered a marker of anterior neural development. To investigate the mechanism responsible for the anterior-posterior (A-P) regionalization of the neural tissue, the expression of Xhox3 has been analysed in total exogastrula. In situ hybridization analyses of exogastrulated embryos show that Xhox3 is expressed in the apical ectoderm of total exogastrulae, a region that develops in the absence of anterior axial mesoderm. The results provide further support for the existence of a neuralizing signal, which originates from the organizer region and spreads through the ectoderm. Moreover, the data suggest that this neural signal also has a role in A-P patterning the neural ectoderm.     

Nodal-related signals establish mesendodermal fate and trunk neural identity in zebrafish

The vertebrate body plan arises during gastrulation, when morphogenetic movements form the ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm. In zebrafish, mesoderm and endoderm derive from the marginal region of the late blastula, and cells located nearer the animal pole form the ectoderm [1]. Analysis in mouse, Xenopus, and zebrafish has demonstrated that Nodal-related proteins, a subclass of the TGF-beta superfamily, are essential for mesendoderm development [2], but previous mutational studies have not established whether Nodal-related signals control fate specification, morphogenetic movements, or survival of mesendodermal precursors. Here, we report that Nodal-related signals are required to allocate marginal cells to mesendodermal fates in the zebrafish embryo. In double mutants for the zebrafish nodal-related genes squint (sqt) and cyclops (cyc) [3] [4] [5], dorsal marginal cells adopt neural fates, whereas in wild-type embryos, cells at this position form endoderm and axial mesoderm. Involution movements characteristic of developing mesendoderm are also blocked in the absence of Nodal signaling. Because it has been proposed [6] that inhibition of Nodal-related signals promotes the development of anterior neural fates, we also examined anteroposterior organization of the neural tube in sqt;cyc mutants. Anterior trunk spinal cord is absent in sqt;cyc mutants, despite the presence of more anterior and posterior neural fates. These results demonstrate that nodal-related genes are required for the allocation of dorsal marginal cells to mesendodermal fates and for anteroposterior patterning of the neural tube.     

Epithelial Cell Wedging and Neural Trough Formation Are Induced Planarly inXenopus,without Persistent Vertical Interactions with Mesoderm

In this study we investigate the induction of the cell behaviors underlying neurulation in the frog,Xenopus laevis.Although planar signals from the organizer can induce convergent extension movements of the posterior neural tissue in explants, the remaining morphogenic processes of neurulation do not appear to occur in absence of vertical interactions with the organizer (R. Kelleret al.,1992,Dev. Dyn.193, 218–234). These processes include: (1) cell elongation perpendicular to the plane of the epithelium, forming the neural plate; (2) cell wedging, which rolls the neural plate into a trough; (3) intercalation of two layers of neural plate cells to form one layer; and (4) fusion of the neural folds. To allow planar signaling between all the inducing tissues of the involuting marginal zone and the responding prospective ectoderm, we have designed a “giant sandwich” explant. In these explants, cell elongation and wedging are induced in the superficial neural layer by planar signals without persistent vertical interactions with underlying, involuted mesoderm. A neural trough forms, and neural folds form and approach one another. However, the neural folds do not fuse with one another, and the deep cells of these explants do not undergo their normal behaviors of elongation, wedging, and intercalation between the superficial neural cells, even when planar signals are supplemented with vertical signaling until the late midgastrula (stage 11.5). Vertical interactions with mesoderm during and beyond the late gastrula stage were required for expression of these deep cell behaviors and for neural fold fusion. These explants offer a way to regulate deep and superficial cell behaviors and thus make possible the analysis of the relative roles of these behaviors in closing the neural tube.     

Calcium transients triggered by planar signals induce the expression of ZIC3 gene during neural induction in Xenopus

In intact Xenopus embryos, an increase in intracellular Ca(2+) in the dorsal ectoderm is both necessary and sufficient to commit the ectoderm to a neural fate. However, the relationship between this Ca(2+) increase and the expression of early neural genes is as yet unknown. In intact embryos, studying the interaction between Ca(2+) signaling and gene expression during neural induction is complicated by the fact that the dorsal ectoderm receives both planar and vertical signals from the mesoderm. The experimental system may be simplified by using Keller open-face explants where vertical signals are eliminated, thus allowing the interaction between planar signals, Ca(2+) transients, and neural induction to be explored. We have imaged Ca(2+) dynamics during neural induction in open-face explants by using aequorin. Planar signals generated by the mesoderm induced localized Ca(2+) transients in groups of cells in the ectoderm. These transients resulted from the activation of L-type Ca(2+) channels. The accumulated Ca(2+) pattern correlated with the expression of the early neural precursor gene, Zic3. When the transients were blocked with pharmacological agents, the level of Zic3 expression was dramatically reduced. These data indicate that, in open-face explants, planar signals reproduce Ca(2+) -signaling patterns similar to those observed in the dorsal ectoderm of intact embryos and that the accumulated effect of the localized Ca(2+) transients over time may play a role in controlling the expression pattern of Zic3.     

Mesoderm induction in the future tail region of Xenopus

Summary We have used interspecific grafts between Xenopus borealis and Xenopus laevis to study the signalling system that produces tail mesoderm. Early gastrula ectoderm grafted into the posterior neural plate region of neurulae responds to a mesodermal inducing signal in this region and forms mainly tail somites; this signal persists until at least the early tail bud stage. Ventral ectoderm grafted into the posterior neural plate loses its competence to respond to this signal after stage 10 1/2. We have established the specification of anterior and posterior neural plate ectoderm. In ectodermal sandwiches or when grafted into unusual positions, anterior regions gave rise to mainly nervous system and posterior regions to large amounts of muscle, together with some nervous system. Thus it was impossible to assess the competence of posterior neural plate ectoderm to form further mesoderm and hence to establish if mesodermal induction continues during neurulation in unmanipulated embryos.     

A novel homeobox gene expressed in the anterior neural plate of the Xenopus embryo.

To obtain gene sequences controlling the early steps of amphibian neurogenesis, we have performed differential screening of a subtractive cDNA library prepared by a novel PCR-based method from a single presumptive neural plate of a Xenopus laevis late-gastrula embryo. As a result we have isolated a fragment of a novel homeobox gene (named XANF-1, for Xenopus anterior neural folds). This gene is expressed predominantly in the anterior part of the developing nervous system. Such preferential localization of XANF-1 mRNA is established from its initially homogenous distribution in ectoderm of early gastrula. This change in the expression pattern is conditioned by a differential influence of various mesoderm regions on ectoderm: anterior mesoderm activates XANF-1 expression in the overlying ectoderm, whereas posterior axial and ventral mesoderm areas inhibit it. The data obtained demonstrate for the first time that selection of genes for specific expression in the CNS of the early vertebrate embryo is affected not only by chordamesoderm (a neural inductor) but also by ventral mesoderm.     

Hensen's node induces neural tissue in Xenopus ectoderm. Implications for the action of the organizer in neural induction.

The development of the vertebrate nervous system is initiated in amphibia by inductive interactions between ectoderm and a region of the embryo called the organizer. The organizer tissue in the dorsal lip of the blastopore of Xenopus and Hensen's node in chick embryos have similar neural inducing properties when transplanted into ectopic sites in their respective embryos. To begin to determine the nature of the inducing signals of the organizer and whether they are conserved across species we have examined the ability of Hensen's node to induce neural tissue in Xenopus ectoderm. We show that Hensen's node induces large amounts of neural tissue in Xenopus ectoderm. Neural induction proceeds in the absence of mesodermal differentiation and is accompanied by tissue movements which may reflect notoplate induction. The competence of the ectoderm to respond to Hensen's node extends much later in development than that to activin-A or to induction by vegetal cells, and parallels the extended competence to neural induction by axial mesoderm. The actions of activin-A and Hensen's node are further distinguished by their effects on lithium-treated ectoderm. These results suggest that neural induction can occur efficiently in response to inducing signals from organizer tissue arrested at a stage prior to gastrulation, and that such early interactions in the blastula may be an important component of neural induction in vertebrate embryos.     

Vertical versus planar induction in amphibian early development

In the Urodeles, the archenteron roof invaginates as a single continuous sheet of cells, vertically inducing the neural anlage in the overlying ectoderm during invagination. The induction comprises first the activation process, leading, to forebrain differentiation tendencies, and then the superimposed transformation process, which changes presumptive forebrain development into that of hindbrain and spinal cord acting with a caudally increasing intensity. The activating action, being maximal anteriorly, decreases caudally to nearly zero. In the double-layered Xenopus embryo, the internal mesodermal marginal zone shows much more independent and earlier regional segregation and involution than the external marginal zone in the Urodeles; its prechordal mesoderm already initiating vertical neural induction in overlying ectoderm at stages 10 to 10⁺ before any visible archenteron invagination. In Xenopus incomplete exogastrulae the prechordal mesoderm involutes normally prior to evagination of the endoderm and mesodem. Artificially produced Xenopus total exogastrulae, made at stage 9 before mesoderm involution, behave just like axolotl total exogastrulae, showing no neural differentiation. The notion of planar neural induction in Xenopus can only be applied in exogastrulae and Keller explants for the transforming action, which is maximal in the caudal archenteron roof. In normal Xenopus development, the formation of the entire nervous system is essentially due to vertical induction by the successively involuting prechordal and notochordal mesoderm. The different behavior of Xenopus embryos in comparison with Urodele embryos can essentially be explained by the double-layered character of the animal moiety of the Xenopus embryo.     

Analysis of Wnt8 for neural posteriorizing factor by identifying Frizzled 8c and Frizzled 9 as functional receptors for Wnt8

The dorsal ectoderm of vertebrate gastrula is first specified into anterior fate by an activation signal and posteriorized by a graded transforming signal, leading to the formation of forebrain, midbrain, hindbrain and spinal cord along the anteroposterior (A-P) axis. Transplanted non-axial mesoderm rather than axial mesoderm has an ability to transform prospective anterior neural tissue into more posterior fates in zebrafish. Wnt8 is a secreted factor that is expressed in non-axial mesoderm. To investigate whether Wnt8 is the neural posteriorizing factor that acts upon neuroectoderm, we first assigned Frizzled 8c and Frizzled 9 to be functional receptors for Wnt8. We then, transplanted non-axial mesoderm into the embryos in which Wnt8 signaling is cell-autonomously blocked by the dominant-negative form of Wnt8 receptors. Non-axial mesodermal transplants in embryos in which Wnt8 signaling is cell-autonomously blocked induced the posterior neural markers as efficiently as in wild-type embryos, suggesting that Wnt8 signaling is not required in neuroectoderm for posteriorization by non-axial mesoderm. Furthermore, Wnt8 signaling, detected by nuclear localization of beta-catenin, was not activated in the posterior neuroectoderm but confined in marginal non-axial mesoderm. Finally, ubiquitous over-expression of Wnt8 does not expand neural ectoderm of posterior character in the absence of mesoderm or Nodal-dependent co-factors. We thus conclude that other factors from non-axial mesoderm may be required for patterning neuroectoderm along the A-P axis.     

Homoiogenetic regulation through the ectoderm on localized expression of the hatching gland phenotype in the head area of Xenopus embryos

Ectoderm pieces explanted from embryos of Xenopus laevis were cultured and examined for differentiation of hatching gland cells, using immunoreactivity against anti-XHE (Xenopus hatching enzyme) as a marker. The anterio-dorsal ectoderm excised from stage 12-13 (mid-late gastrula) embryos developed hatching gland cells. Meanwhile, the posterio-, but not the anterio-dorsal ectoderm from stage 11 (early gastrula) embryos developed these cells, although it is not fated to do so during normogenesis. This hatching gland cell differentiation from stage 11 posterior ectoderm was not affected by conjugated sandwich culture with the mesoderm but was suppressed when explants contained an anterior portion of the ectoderm. Conjugated cultures of anterior and posterior portions of the ectoderm in various combinations indicated that differentiation of hatching gland cells from stage 11 posterior and stage 12 anterior portions was suppressed specifically by stage 11 anterior ectoderm. Northern blot analyses of cultured explants showed that XHE was expressed in association with XA-1, suggesting its dependence on the anteriorized state. These results indicate that the planar signal(s) emanating from stage 11 anterior ectoderm participates in suppression of the expression of the anteriorized phenotype so that an ordered differentiation along the anteroposterior axis of the surface ectoderm is accomplished.     

Planar signalling is not sufficient to generate a specific anterior/posterior neural pattern in pseudoexogastrula explants from Xenopus and Triturus

Early observations on the morphology of total exogastrulae from urodeles (Axolotl) had provided evidence for essential vertical signalling mechanisms in the process of neural induction. Conversely, more recent studies with anurans (Xenopus laevis) making use of molecular markers for neural-specific gene expression appear to support the idea of planar signalling as providing sufficient information for neural differentiation along the anterior-posterior axis. In an attempt to resolve this apparent contradiction, we report on the comparative analysis of morphology and gene expression characteristics with explants prepared from both urodeles (Triturus alpestris) and anurans (Xenopus laevis). For this purpose, we have made use of a refined experimental protocol for the preparation of exogastrulae that is intended to combine the advantages of the Holtfreter type exogastrula and the Keller sandwich techniques, and which we refer to as pseudoexogastrula explants. Analysis of histology and expression of several neural and ectodermal marker genes in such explants suggests that neural differentiation is induced in both species, but only within the intermediate zone between ectoderm and endomesoderm. Therefore, experiments with Xenopus and Triturus explants described in this communication argue against planar signalling events as being sufficient to generate a specific anterior/posterior neural pattern.     

Programming neural Hoxd10: in vivo evidence that early node-associated signals predominate over paraxial mesoderm signals at posterior spinal levels

Studies of the programming of Hox patterns at anterior spinal levels suggest that these events are accomplished through an integration of Hensen's node-derived and paraxial mesoderm signaling. We have used in vivo tissue manipulation in the avian embryo to examine the respective roles of node- derived and other local signals in the programming of a Hox pattern at posterior spinal levels. Hoxd10 is highly expressed in the lumbosacral (LS) spinal cord and adjacent paraxial mesoderm. At stages of LS neural tube formation (stages 12-14), the tailbud contains the remnants of Hensen's node and the primitive streak. Hoxd10 expression was analyzed after transposition of LS neural segments with and without the tailbud, after isolation of normally positioned LS segments from the stage 13 tailbud, and after axial displacement of posterior paraxial mesoderm. Data suggest that inductive signals from the tailbud are primarily responsible for the programming of Hoxd10 at neural plate and the earliest neural tube stages. After these stages, the LS neural tube appears to differ from more anterior neural segments in its lack of dependence on Hox-inductive signals from local tissues, including paraxial mesoderm. Our data also suggest that a graded system of repressive signals for posterior Hox genes is present at cervical and thoracic levels and likely to originate from paraxial mesoderm.     

Monopolar protrusive activity: a new morphogenic cell behavior in the neural plate dependent on vertical interactions with the mesoderm in Xenopus

We compared the type and patterning of morphogenic cell behaviors driving convergent extension of the Xenopus neural plate in the presence and absence of persistent vertical signals from the mesoderm by videorecording explants of deep neural tissue with involuted mesoderm attached and of deep neural tissue alone. In deep neural-over-mesoderm explants, neural plate cells express monopolar medially directed motility and notoplate cells express randomly oriented motility, two new morphogenic cell behaviors. In contrast, in deep neural explants (without notoplate), all cells express bipolar mediolateral cell motility. Deep neural-over-mesoderm and deep neural explants also differ in degree of neighbor exchange during mediolateral cell intercalation. In deep neural-over-mesoderm explants, cells intercalate conservatively, whereas in deep neural explants cells intercalate more promiscuously. Last, in both deep neural-over-mesoderm and deep neural explants, morphogenic cell behaviors differentiate in an anterior-to-posterior and lateral-to-medial progression. However, in deep neural-over-mesoderm explants, morphogenic behaviors first differentiate in intervals along the anteroposterior axis, whereas in deep neural explants, morphogenic behaviors differentiate continuously from the anterior end of the tissue posteriorly. These results describe new morphogenic cell behaviors driving neural convergent extension and also define roles for signals from the mesoderm, up to and beyond late gastrulation, in patterning these cell behaviors.     

The midline (notochord and notoplate) patterns the cell motility underlying convergence and extension of the Xenopus neural plate

We investigated the role of the dorsal midline structures, the notochord and notoplate, in patterning the cell motilities that underlie convergent extension of the Xenopus neural plate. In explants of deep neural plate with underlying dorsal mesoderm, lateral neural plate cells show a monopolar, medially directed protrusive activity. In contrast, neural plate explants lacking the underlying dorsal mesoderm show a bipolar, mediolaterally directed protrusive activity. Here, we report that "midlineless" explants consisting of the deep neural plate and underlying somitic mesoderm, but lacking a midline, show bipolar, mediolaterally oriented protrusive activity. Adding an ectopic midline to the lateral edge of these explants restores the monopolar protrusive activity over the entire extent of the midlineless explant. Monopolarized cells near the ectopic midline orient toward it, whereas those located near the original, removed midline orient toward this midline. This behavior can be explained by two signals emanating from the midline. We postulate that one signal polarizes neural plate deep cells and is labile and short-lived and that the second signal orients any polarized cells toward the midline and is persistent.     

A homeobox-containing marker of posterior neural differentiation shows the importance of predetermination in neural induction

A homeobox sequence has been used to isolate a new Xenopus cDNA, named XIHbox6. A short probe from this gene serves as an early marker of posterior neural differentiation in the Xenopus nervous system. The gene recognized by this cDNA sequence is first transcribed at the late gastrula stage and solely in the posterior neural cells. The gene is expressed when ectodermal and mesodermal tissues of an early gastrula are placed in contact, but not by either tissue cultured on its own. However, gene expression is most easily inducible in ectoderm from the dorsal region, i.e., in ectoderm normally destined to form neural structures. This establishes the principle, in contrast to previous belief, that the induction of the embryonic nervous system involves a predisposition of the ectoderm and does not depend entirely on an interaction with inducing mesoderm.