Smad7 antagonizes transforming growth factor beta signaling in the nucleus by interfering with functional Smad-DNA complex formation

Smad7 plays an essential role in the negative-feedback regulation of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) signaling by inhibiting TGF-beta signaling at the receptor level. It can interfere with binding to type I receptors and thus activation of receptor-regulated Smads or recruit the E3 ubiquitin ligase Smurf to receptors and thus target them for degradation. Here, we report that Smad7 is predominantly localized in the nucleus of Hep3B cells. The targeted expression of Smad7 in the nucleus conferred superior inhibitory activity on TGF-beta signaling, as determined by reporter assay in mammalian cells and by its effect on zebrafish embryogenesis. Furthermore, Smad7 repressed Smad3/4-, Smad2/4-, and Smad1/4-enhanced reporter gene expression, indicating that Smad7 can function independently of type I receptors. An oligonucleotide precipitation assay revealed that Smad7 can specifically bind to the Smad-responsive element via its MH2 domain, and DNA-binding activity was further confirmed in vivo with the promoter of PAI-1, a TGF-beta target gene, by chromatin immunoprecipitation. Finally, we provide evidence that Smad7 disrupts the formation of the TGF-beta-induced functional Smad-DNA complex. Our findings suggest that Smad7 inhibits TGF-beta signaling in the nucleus by a novel mechanism.     

Novel dominant negative Smad antagonists to TGFbeta signaling

We previously identified a critical serine/threonine residue within the linker domain of Smad2/3, phosphorylated by the kinase GRK2 which plays a critical role in regulating Smad signaling. To define the mechanism by which GRK2-mediated phosphorylation modifies Smad2/3 behavior at the molecular level, we generated mutant Smads where the GRK2 phosphorylation site was replaced with an aspartic acid (D) to mimic the properties of a phospho-residue or an alanine (A) as a control. Interestingly, overexpression of either the D or A mutant inhibits TGFbeta signaling, but through two distinct mechanisms. The D mutant is properly localized and released from the plasma membrane upon ligand stimulation, but fails to interact with the type I receptor kinase. The A mutant properly interacts with and is phosphorylated by the type I receptor, translocates to the nucleus and homodimerizes with wild-type R-Smads, but it fails to form a heterocomplex with Smad4. As a result, both mutants act as antagonists of endogenous TGFbeta signaling through divergent mechanisms. The D mutant acts by blocking endogenous R-Smads phosphorylation and the A mutant acts by preventing endogenous R-Smad/Smad4 heterocomplexes. Thus, mutation of the GRK2 phosphorylation site within the Smad generates dominant negative Smads that efficiently inhibit TGFbeta responses.     

Role of Smad4 (DPC4) inactivation in human cancer

The tumor suppressor gene Smad4 (DPC4) at chromosome 18q21.1 belongs to the Smad family, which mediates the TGFbeta signaling pathway suppressing epithelial cell growth. This review summarizes the mutational events of the Smad4 gene in human cancer. The Smad4 gene is genetically responsible for familial juvenile polyposis, an autosomal dominant disease characterized by predisposition to gastrointestinal polyps and cancer. In this syndrome, polyps are formed by inactivation of the Smad4 gene through germline mutation and loss of the unaffected wild-type allele. In pancreatic and colorectal cancer, inactivation of the Smad4 gene through homozygous deletion or intragenic mutation occurs frequently in association with malignant progression. However, mutation of this gene is seen only occasionally in the rest of human cancers. The majority of Smad4 gene mutations in human cancer are missense, nonsense, and frameshift mutations at the mad homology 2 region (MH2), which interfere with the homo-oligomer formation of Smad4 protein and the hetero-oligomer formation between Smad4 and Smad2 proteins, resulting in disruption of TGFbeta signaling. Supporting evidence for the above observation was provided by genetically manipulated mice carrying either a heterozygote of the Smad4 gene or a compound heterozygote of the Smad4 and APC genes, which develop either gastrointestinal polyps/cancer mimicking familial juvenile polyposis or progressed colorectal cancer, respectively.