Current concepts in coronary physiology for the interventionalist

Coronary angiography remains the 'gold standard' for the diagnosis of epicardial coronary disease. However, precise quantification of stenosis severity is limited because of the complex three-dimensional geometry of epicardial plaques. To assist the angiographer in lesion assessment, several physiologic measurements have been developed to evaluate stenosis severity, including coronary flow reserve, relative coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve. Physiologic lesion assessment can also be an invaluable tool in coronary intervention, evaluating efficacy of angioplasty and stent deployment.     

Effect of simultaneous intracoronary guidewires on the predictive accuracy of functional parameters of coronary lesion severity

The aim of this study was to assess the influence of a second guidewire on the diagnostic accuracy of functional parameters of coronary lesion severity. Sixty-five patients with intermediate coronary lesions underwent myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Fractional flow reserve (FFR), coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR), and hyperemic stenosis resistance (HSR) index (HSR = stenosis pressure gradient / velocity) were determined in 77 lesions. Distal pressure and velocity were acquired simultaneously (dual wire) and sequentially (single wire) with two sensor-equipped guidewires. Overall, functional parameters deteriorated from single- to dual-wire assessment. In patients without ischemia, the good diagnostic performance of FFR, CFVR, and HSR deteriorated significantly (P < 0.001) when assessed by dual wires, with an increase in the number of false-positive results. This trend was more pronounced for HSR, since the presence of a second wire reduced maximal velocity and increased the pressure gradient. The presence of two guidewires, especially across a myocardial perfusion scintigraphy-induced nonsignificant lesion, is associated with overestimation of the hemodynamically assessed lesion severity and, therefore, is likely to have a major impact on clinical decision making. This underscores the advantage of a dual-sensor-equipped guidewire for the evaluation of stenosis severity by combined pressure and velocity measurements.     

Evaluation of functional severity of coronary artery disease and fluid dynamics' influence on hemodynamic parameters: A review

Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) is responsible for most of the deaths in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Diagnostic coronary angiography analysis offers an anatomical knowledge of the severity of the stenosis. The functional or physiological significance is more valuable than the anatomical significance of CAD. Clinicians assess the functional severity of the stenosis by resorting to an invasive measurement of the pressure drop and flow. Hemodynamic parameters, such as pressure wire assessment fractional flow reserve (FFR) or Doppler wire assessment coronary flow reserve (CFR) are well-proven techniques to evaluate the physiological significance of the coronary artery stenosis in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Between the two techniques mentioned above, the FFR is seen as a very useful index. The presence of guide wire reduces the coronary flow which causes the underestimation of pressure drop across the stenosis which leads to dilemma for the clinicians in the assessment of moderate stenosis. In such condition, the fundamental fluid mechanics is useful in the development of new functional severity parameters such as pressure drop coefficient and lesion flow coefficient. Since the flow takes place in a narrowed artery, the blood behaves as a non-Newtonian fluid. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) allows a complete coronary flow simulation to study the relationship between the pressure and flow. This paper aims at explaining (i) diagnostic modalities for the evaluation of the CAD and valuable insights regarding FFR in the evaluation of the functional severity of the CAD (ii) the role of fluid dynamics in measuring the severity of CAD.     

Deferring angioplasty in intermediate coronary lesions based on coronary flow criteria is safe: comparison of a deferred group to an intervention group

The decision for revascularization in patients with intermediate coronary lesions remains a challenging topic, particularly when objective data of reversible ischemia are lacking. In some of the patients, coronary revascularization is performed or deferred without definitive evidence on the clinical significance of the coronary stenosis. We investigated the usefulness of coronary flow reserve (CFR) measurements in 28 patients with intermediate coronary lesions. We compared 20 patients who underwent angioplasty based on Doppler-wire-derived CFR with 8 patients for whom angioplasty was deferred (diameter stenosis of 50.7 +/- 2.0% versus 46.5 +/- 3.1%, P < 0.0001 and CFR of 1.80 +/- 0.32 versus 2.65 +/- 0.11, P = 0.002, respectively). Angioplasty resulted in normalization of the CFR to 2.57 +/- 0.53 (P < 0.0001, versus the baseline value). During a follow-up period of 58.1 weeks (range 23-149 weeks), eight patients in the revascularization group were readmitted to the hospital, one of them with a myocardial infarction in the territory of the target vessel, compared with only one admission in the deferred group. Target-vessel revascularization was performed in three patients (a fourth patient declined it) in the former group, compared with only one in the latter. Symptomatic improvement or no change in clinical status was observed in the majority of patients in both groups (90% in the revascularization group and 87.5% in the deferred group). We conclude that in a selected group of patients with intermediate coronary lesions, measurement of CFR may be a useful tool in determining the need for revascularization based on its physiologic significance. Importantly, deferring PTCA in patients with intermediate lesions and normal CFR values seems to be safe.     

Influence of newly designed monorail pressure sensor catheter on coronary diagnostic parameters: An in vitro study

The decision to perform intervention on a patient with coronary stenosis is often based on functional diagnostic parameters obtained from pressure and flow measurements using sensor-tipped guidewire at maximal vasodilation (hyperemia). Recently, a rapid exchange Monorail Pressure Sensor catheter of 0.022″ diameter (MPS22), with pressure sensor at distal end has been developed for improved assessment of stenosis severity. The hollow shaft of the MPS22 is designed to slide over any standard 0.014″ guidewire (G14). Hence, influence of MPS22 diameter on coronary diagnostic parameters needs investigation. An in vitro experiment was conducted to replicate physiologic flows in three representative area stenosis (AS): mild (64% AS), intermediate (80% AS), and severe (90% AS), for two arterial diameters, 3 mm (N2; more common) and 2.5 mm (N1). Influence of MPS22 on diagnostic parameters: fractional flow reserve (FFR) and pressure drop coefficient (CDP) was evaluated both at hyperemic and basal conditions, while comparing it with G14. The FFR values decreased for the MPS22 in comparison to G14, (Mild: 0.87 vs 0.88, Intermediate: 0.68 vs 0.73, Severe: 0.48 vs 0.56) and CDP values increased (Mild: 16 vs 14, Intermediate: 75 vs 56, Severe: 370 vs 182) for N2. Similar trend was observed in the case of N1. The FFR values were found to be well above (mild) and below (intermediate and severe) the diagnostic cut-off of 0.75. Therefore, MPS22 catheter can be used as a possible alternative to G14. Further, irrespective of the MPS22 or G14, basal FFR (FFR_b) had overlapping ranges in close proximity for clinically relevant mild and intermediate stenoses that will lead to diagnostic uncertainty under both N1 and N2. However, CDP_b had distinct ranges for different stenosis severities and could be a potential diagnostic parameter under basal conditions.     

Influence of serotonin on myocardial blood flow in the presence and absence of a coronary arterial stenosis: observations in domestic swine

This study tested the hypothesis that 5-HT may impair coronary flow regulation by inappropriately increasing arteriolar tone in the coronary circulation. Ten closed chest, domestic swine were studied both in the presence and in the absence of a severe artificial intraluminal coronary stenosis. A 5-French micromanometer catheter with fluid lumen was placed in the left anterior descending coronary artery and used to record pressure and infuse 5-HT (40 and 100 micrograms/min) into the coronary circulation. For the stenosis phase of the protocol the catheter was embedded in the artificial stenosis. Hemodynamics, regional myocardial blood flow (microsphere technique), coronary vascular resistance, lactate consumption, and oxygen metabolism were measured at control and at 5 min of each 5-HT dose. In the absence of coronary artery stenosis (i.e., full vasodilatory reserve), there was no change in regional myocardial blood flow or coronary vascular resistance during 5-HT infusion. In the presence of a severe coronary stenosis (i.e., limited vasodilator reserve) 5-HT produced a significant (P less than 0.05) decrease versus control in the distal left anterior descending: circumflex zone endocardial blood flow ratio (0.63 +/- 0.19, mean +/- 1 SD, to 0.55 +/- 0.15) and a significant (P less than 0.05) increase versus control in endocardial (50.6 +/- 16.6 to 61.2 +/- 19.8 mm Hg/ml/min/g) and transmural (49.9 +/- 9.5 to 57.2 +/- 12.8) coronary vascular resistance. Thus, 5-HT does not impair coronary flow regulation when full vasodilatory reserve is present. When coronary vasodilatory reserve is impaired by the presence of a severe proximal stenosis, 5-HT causes modest impairment of endocardial flow regulation.     

The influence of artery wall curvature on the anatomical assessment of stenosis severity derived from fractional flow reserve: a computational fluid dynamics study

This study aims to investigate the influence of artery wall curvature on the anatomical assessment of stenosis severity and to identify a region of misinterpretation in the assessment of per cent area stenosis (AS) for functionally significant stenosis using fractional flow reserve (FFR) as standard. Five artery models of different per cent AS severity (70, 75, 80, 85 and 90%) were considered. For each per cent AS severity, the angle of curvature of the arterial wall varied from straight to an increasingly curved model (0°, 30°, 60°, 90° and 120°). Computational fluid dynamics was performed under transient physiologic hyperemic flow conditions to investigate the influence of artery wall curvature on the pressure drop and the FFR. The findings in this study may be useful in in vitro anatomical assessment of functionally significant stenosis. The FFR decreased with increasing stenosis severity for a given curvature of the artery wall. Moreover, a significant decrease in FFR was found between straight and curved models discussed for a given severity condition. These findings indicate that the curvature effect was included in the FFR assessment in contrast to minimum lumen area (MLA) or per cent AS assessment. The MLA or per cent AS assessment may lead to underestimation of stenosis severity. From this numerical study, an uncertainty region could be evaluated using the clinical FFR cutoff value of 0.8. This value was observed at 81.98 and 79.10% AS for arteries with curvature angles of 0° and 120° respectively. In conclusion, the curvature of the artery should not be neglected in in vitro anatomical assessment.     

The diastolic flow velocity-pressure gradient relation and dpv50 to assess the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenoses

To evaluate the hemodynamic impact of coronary stenoses, the fractional (FFR) or coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) usually is measured. The combined measurement of instantaneous flow velocity and pressure gradient (v-dp relation) is rarely used in humans. We derived from the v-dp relation a new index, dp(v50) (pressure gradient at flow velocity of 50 cm/s), and compared the diagnostic performance of dp(v50), CFVR, and FFR. Before coronary angiography was performed, patients underwent noninvasive stress testing. In all coronary vessels with an intermediate or severe stenosis, the flow velocity, aortic, and distal coronary pressure were measured simultaneously with a Doppler and pressure guidewire after induction of hyperemia. After regression analysis of all middiastolic flow velocity and pressure gradient data, the dp(v50) was calculated. With the use of the results of noninvasive stress testing, the dp(v50) cutoff value was established at 22.4 mmHg. In 77 patients, 124 coronary vessels with a mean 39% (SD 19) diameter stenosis were analyzed. In 43 stenoses, ischemia was detected. We found a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 56%, 86%, and 76% for CFVR; 77%, 99%, and 91% for FFR; and 95%, 95%, and 95% for dp(v50). To establish that dp(v50) is not dependent on maximal hyperemia, dp(v50) was recalculated after omission of the highest quartile of flow velocity data, showing a difference of 3%. We found that dp(v50) provided the highest sensitivity and accuracy compared with FFR and CFVR in the assessment of coronary stenoses. In contrast to CFVR and FFR, assessment of dp(v50) is not dependent on maximal hyperemia.     

Minimal effect of collateral flow on coronary microvascular resistance in the presence of intermediate and noncritical coronary stenoses

Depending on stenosis severity, collateral flow can be a confounding factor in the determination of coronary hyperemic microvascular resistance (HMR). Under certain assumptions, the calculation of HMR can be corrected for collateral flow by incorporating the wedge pressure (P(w)) in the calculation. However, although P(w) > 25 mmHg is indicative of collateral flow, P(w) does in part also reflect myocardial wall stress neglected in the assumptions. Therefore, the aim of this study was to establish whether adjusting HMR by P(w) is pertinent for a diagnostically relevant range of stenosis severities as expressed by fractional flow reserve (FFR). Accordingly, intracoronary pressure and Doppler flow velocity were measured a total of 95 times in 29 patients distal to a coronary stenosis before and after stepwise percutaneous coronary intervention. HMR was calculated without (HMR) and with P(w)-based adjustment for collateral flow (HMR(C)). FFR ranged from 0.3 to 1. HMR varied between 1 and 5 and HMR(C) between 0.5 and 4.2 mmHg·cm(-1)·s. HMR was about 37% higher than HMR(C) for stenoses with FFR < 0.6, but for FFR > 0.8, the relative difference was reduced to 4.4 ± 3.4%. In the diagnostically relevant range of FFR between 0.6 and 0.8, this difference was 16.5 ± 10.4%. In conclusion, P(w)-based adjustment likely overestimates the effect of potential collateral flow and is not needed for the assessment of coronary HMR in the presence of a flow-limiting stenosis characterized by FFR between 0.6 and 0.8 or for nonsignificant lesions.     

Feasibility of coronary blood flow simulations using mid-fidelity numeric and geometric models

Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology - The fractional flow reserve index (FFR) is currently used as a gold standard to quantify coronary stenosis’s functional relevance. Due to its...     

Influence of coronary collateral flow on coronary diagnostic parameters: An in vitro study

Functional severity of coronary stenosis is often assessed using diagnostic parameters. These parameters are evaluated from the combined pressure and/or flow measurements taken at the site of the stenosis. However, when there are functional collaterals operating downstream to the stenosis, the coronary flow-rate increases, and the pressure in the stenosed artery is altered. This effect of downstream collaterals on different diagnostic parameters is studied using a physiological representative in vitro coronary flow-loop.The three diagnostic parameters tested are fractional flow reserve (FFR), lesion flow coefficient (LFC), and pressure drop coefficient (CDP). The latter two were discussed in recent publications by our group (Banerjee et al., 2008, Banerjee et al., 2007, 2009). They are evaluated for three different severities of stenosis and tested for possible misinterpretation in the presence of variable collateral flows. Pressure and flow are measured with and without downstream collaterals. The diagnostic parameters are then calculated from these readings.In the case of intermediate stenosis (80% area blockage), FFR and LFC increased from 0.74 to 0.77 and 0.58 to 0.62, respectively, for no collateral to fully developed collateral flow. Also, CDP decreased from 47 to 42 for no collateral to fully developed collateral flow. These changes in diagnostic parameters might lead to erroneous postponement of coronary intervention. Thus, variability in diagnostic parameters for the same stenosis might lead to misinterpretation of stenosis severity in the presence of operating downstream collaterals.     

Influence of hemodynamic conditions on fractional flow reserve: parametric analysis of underlying model

Pressure-based fractional flow reserve (FFR) is used clinically to evaluate the functional severity of a coronary stenosis, by predicting relative maximal coronary flow (Q(s)/Q(n)). It is considered to be independent of hemodynamic conditions, which seems unlikely because stenosis resistance is flow dependent. Using a resistive model of an epicardial stenosis (0-80% diameter reduction) in series with the coronary microcirculation at maximal vasodilation, we evaluated FFR for changes in coronary microvascular resistance (R(cor) = 0.2-0.6 mmHg. ml(-1). min), aortic pressure (P(a) = 70-130 mmHg), and coronary outflow pressure (P(b) = 0-15 mmHg). For a given stenosis, FFR increased with decreasing P(a) or increasing R(cor). The sensitivity of FFR to these hemodynamic changes was highest for stenoses of intermediate severity. For P(b) > 0, FFR progressively exceeded Q(s)/Q(n) with increasing stenosis severity unless P(b) was included in the calculation of FFR. Although the P(b)-corrected FFR equaled Q(s)/Q(n) for a given stenosis, both parameters remained equally dependent on hemodynamic conditions, through their direct relationship to both stenosis and coronary resistance.     

Use and limitations of magnetic resonance phase-contrast assessment of coronary flow reserve in a model of collateral dependence

Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) is useful for assessing coronary artery flow reserves (CFR) in man and acute animal models with intermediate coronary lesions. The present study examines the use of PC-MRI for assessing CFR in a model with critical stenosis and collateral dependence. PC-MRI quantitative flow measurements from the proximal left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex (LCX) coronary arteries were compared with myocardial tissue perfusion reserve measurements (microsphere techniques) after placement of a 2.25-mm ameroid constrictor on the proximal LCX in a porcine model; measurements were obtained at implantation (n = 4) and at 3 to 4 weeks (n = 4) and 6 weeks (n = 5) postimplantation. CFR is defined as the ratio of maximal hyperemic flow to baseline flow. Hyperemia was induced using intravenous adenosine (140 mg/kg/min). Collateral dependence in the LCX distri bution was evidenced by angiographic findings of critical stenosis with minimal myocardial histological changes and normal baseline myocardial perfusion (microsphere techniques). In this setting, PC-MRI CFR was correlated with microsphere measures of perfusion reserve. Collateral dependence was confirmed by Evan's blue dye injection. This study provides angiographic, myocardial perfusion, and histological correlates associated with PC-MRI epicardial CFR changes during chronic, progressive coronary artery constriction. It also demonstrates the disparity between epicardial and myocardial measures of coronary flow reserve with collateral dependence and the caveats for PC-MRI use in models of progressive coronary constriction.     

The new clinical standard of integrated quadruple stress echocardiography with ABCD protocol

Background

The detection of regional wall motion abnormalities is the cornerstone of stress echocardiography. Today, stress echo shows increasing trends of utilization due to growing concerns for radiation risk, higher cost and stronger environmental impact of competing techniques. However, it has also limitations: underused ability to identify factors of clinical vulnerability outside coronary artery stenosis; operator-dependence; low positivity rate in contemporary populations; intermediate risk associated with a negative test; limited value of wall motion beyond coronary artery disease. Nevertheless, stress echo has potential to adapt to a changing environment and overcome its current limitations.

Integrated-quadruple stress-echo

Four parameters now converge conceptually, logistically, and methodologically in the Integrated Quadruple (IQ)-stress echo. They are: 1- regional wall motion abnormalities; 2-B-lines measured by lung ultrasound; 3-left ventricular contractile reserve assessed as the stress/rest ratio of force (systolic arterial pressure by cuff sphygmomanometer/end-systolic volume from 2D); 4- coronary flow velocity reserve on left anterior descending coronary artery (with color-Doppler guided pulsed wave Doppler). IQ-Stress echo allows a synoptic functional assessment of epicardial coronary artery stenosis (wall motion), lung water (B-lines), myocardial function (left ventricular contractile reserve) and coronary small vessels (coronary flow velocity reserve in mid or distal left anterior descending artery). In “ABCD” protocol, A stands for Asynergy (ischemic vs non-ischemic heart); B for B-lines (wet vs dry lung); C for Contractile reserve (weak vs strong heart); D for Doppler flowmetry (warm vs cold heart, since the hyperemic blood flow increases the local temperature of the myocardium). From the technical (acquisition/analysis) viewpoint and required training, B-lines are the kindergarten, left ventricular contractile reserve the primary (for acquisition) and secondary (for analysis) school, wall motion the university, and coronary flow velocity reserve the PhD program of stress echo.

Conclusion

Stress echo is changing. As an old landline telephone with only one function, yesterday stress echo used one sign (regional wall motion abnormalities) for one patient with coronary artery disease. As a versatile smart-phone with multiple applications, stress echo today uses many signs for different pathophysiological and clinical targets. Large scale effectiveness studies are now in progress in the Stress Echo2020 project with the omnivorous “ABCD” protocol.

     

Patients with coronary stenosis and a fractional flow reserve of ≥0.75 measured in daily practice at the VU University Medical Center

Objectives. The aim of this study was to analyse the rate of major adverse clinical events in patients with coronary artery disease and a fractional flow reserve (FFR) of ≥0.75 and deferred for coronary intervention in daily practice. Methods. From 1 January to 31 December 2006, FFR measurement was initiated in 122 patients (5%) out of 2444 patients referred for coronary angiography. In two patients FFR measurement failed and in one patient the FFR value could no longer be traced in the documents. Thus, 119 patients (84 men, 64 years, range 41-85) were included in the evaluation (145 lesions). Major adverse clinical events (death, myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)) and the presence of angina were evaluated at follow-up. Furthermore a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed. Results. In 93 patients (76%) the FFR value was ≥0.75. Seventy of these 93 patients (76%) were treated with medication alone or underwent PCI for a different lesion (medical treatment group). Average duration of follow-up of all 119 patients was 22 months (range 4 days to 30 months). In the medical treatment group seven patients (10%) experienced a major adverse clinical event related to the FFR-evaluated lesion during follow-up. In this study population, the use of FFR measurement is cost-reducing provided that at least 65% of the patients in the medical treatment group has had a PCI with stent implantation when the use of FFR measurement is impossible. In this case, the decision to use PCI with stent implantation is purely based on the angiogram. Conclusions. In patients with a coronary stenosis based on visual assessment and an FFR of ≥0.75 deferral of PCI or CABG is safe in daily clinical practice and saves money. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:402-7.)     

Pressure drop and arterial compliance – Two arterial parameters in one measurement

Coronary artery pressure-drop and distensibility (compliance) are two major, seemingly unrelated, parameters in the cardiovascular clinical setting, which are indicative of coronary arteries patency and atherosclerosis severity. While pressure drop is related to flow, and therefore serves as a functional indicator of a stenosis severity, the arterial distensibility is indicative of the arterial stiffness, and hence the arterial wall composition. In the present study, we hypothesized that local pressure drops are dependent on the arterial distensibility, and hence can provide information on both indices. The clinical significance is that a single measurement of pressure drop could potentially provide both functional and bio-mechanical metrics of lesions, and thus assist in real-time decision making prior to stenting. The goal of the current study was to set the basis for understanding this relationship, and define the accuracy and sensitivity required from the pressure measurement system. The investigation was performed using numerical fluid–structure interaction (FSI) simulations, validated experimentally using our high accuracy differential pressure measurement system. Simplified silicone mock coronary arteries with zero to intermediate size stenoses were used, and various combinations of arterial distensibility, diameter, and flow rate were simulated. Results of hyperemic flow cases were also compared to fractional flow reserve (FFR). The results indicate the potential clinical superiority of a high accuracy pressure drop-based parameter over FFR, by: (i) being more lesion-specific, (ii) the possibility to circumvent the FFR dependency on pharmacologically-induced hyperemia, and, (iii) by providing both functional and biomechanical lesion-specific information.     

Influence of heart rate on fractional flow reserve, pressure drop coefficient, and lesion flow coefficient for epicardial coronary stenosis in a porcine model

A limitation in the use of invasive coronary diagnostic indexes is that fluctuations in hemodynamic factors such as heart rate (HR), blood pressure, and contractility may alter resting or hyperemic flow measurements and may introduce uncertainties in the interpretation of these indexes. In this study, we focused on the effect of fluctuations in HR and area stenosis (AS) on diagnostic indexes. We hypothesized that the pressure drop coefficient (CDP(e), ratio of transstenotic pressure drop and distal dynamic pressure), lesion flow coefficient (LFC, square root of ratio of limiting value CDP and CDP at site of stenosis) derived from fluid dynamics principles, and fractional flow reserve (FFR, ratio of average distal and proximal pressures) are independent of HR and can significantly differentiate between the severity of stenosis. Cardiac catheterization was performed on 11 Yorkshire pigs. Simultaneous measurements of distal coronary arterial pressure and flow were performed using a dual sensor-tipped guidewire for HR < 120 and HR > 120 beats/min, in the presence of epicardial coronary lesions of <50% AS and >50% AS. The mean values of FFR, CDP(e), and LFC were significantly different (P < 0.05) for lesions of <50% AS and >50% AS (0.88 ± 0.04, 0.76 ± 0.04; 62 ± 30, 151 ± 35, and 0.10 ± 0.02 and 0.16 ± 0.01, respectively). The mean values of FFR and CDP(e) were not significantly different (P > 0.05) for variable HR conditions of HR < 120 and HR > 120 beats/min (FFR, 0.81 ± 0.04 and 0.82 ± 0.04; and CDP(e), 95 ± 33 and 118 ± 36). The mean values of LFC do somewhat vary with HR (0.14 ± 0.01 and 0.12 ± 0.02). In conclusion, fluctuations in HR have no significant influence on the measured values of CDP(e) and FFR but have a marginal influence on the measured values of LFC. However, all three parameters can significantly differentiate between stenosis severities. These results suggest that the diagnostic parameters can be potentially used in a better assessment of coronary stenosis severity under a clinical setting.     

Characterizing momentum change and viscous loss of a hemodynamic endpoint in assessment of coronary lesions

Myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR(myo)) and coronary flow reserve (CFR), measured with guidewire, and quantitative angiography (QA) are widely used in combination to distinguish ischemic from non-ischemic coronary stenoses. Recent studies have shown that simultaneous measurements of FFR(myo) and CFR are recommended to dissociate conduit epicardial coronary stenoses from distal resistance microvascular disease. In this study, a more comprehensive diagnostic parameter, named as lesion flow coefficient, c, is proposed. The coefficient, c, which accounts for mean pressure drop, Delta p, mean coronary flow, Q, and percentage area stenosis, can be used to assess the hemodynamic severity of a coronary artery stenoses. Importantly, the contribution of viscous loss and loss due to momentum change for several lesion sizes can be distinguished using c. FFR(myo), CFR and c were calculated for pre-angioplasty, intermediate and post-angioplasty epicardial lesions, without microvascular disease. While hyperemic c decreased from 0.65 for pre-angioplasty to 0.48 for post-angioplasty lesion with guidewire of size 0.35 mm, FFR(myo) increased from 0.52 to 0.87, and CFR increased from 1.72 to 3.45, respectively. Thus, reduced loss produced by momentum change due to lower percentage area stenosis decreased c. For post-angioplasty lesion, c decreased from 0.55 to 0.48 with the insertion of guidewire. Hence, increased viscous loss due to the presence of guidewire decreased c compared with a lesion without guidewire. Further, c showed a linear relationship with FFR(myo), CFR and percentage area stenosis for pre-angioplasty, intermediate and post-angioplasty lesion. These baseline values of c were developed from fluid dynamics fundamentals for focal lesions, and provided a single hemodynamic endpoint to evaluate coronary stenosis severity.     

Quantification of absolute coronary flow reserve and relative fractional flow reserve in a swine animal model using angiographic image data

Coronary flow reserve (CFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) are important physiological indexes for coronary disease. The purpose of this study was to validate the CFR and FFR measurement techniques using only angiographic image data. Fifteen swine were instrumented with an ultrasound flow probe on the left anterior descending artery (LAD). Microspheres were gradually injected into the LAD to create microvascular disruption. An occluder was used to produce stenosis. Contrast material injections were made into the left coronary artery during image acquisition. Volumetric blood flow from the flow probe (Q(q)) was continuously recorded. Angiography-based blood flow (Q(a)) was calculated by using a time-density curve based on the first-pass analysis technique. Flow probe-based CFR (CFR(q)) and angiography-based CFR (CFR(a)) were calculated as the ratio of hyperemic to baseline flow using Q(q) and Q(a), respectively. Relative angiographic FFR (relative FFR(a)) was calculated as the ratio of the normalized Q(a) in LAD to the left circumflex artery (LC(X)) during hyperemia. Flow probe-based FFR (FFR(q)) was measured from the ratio of hyperemic flow with and without disease. CFR(a) showed a strong correlation with the gold standard CFR(q) (CFR(a) = 0.91 CFR(q) + 0.30; r = 0.90; P < 0.0001). Relative FFR(a) correlated linearly with FFR(q) (relative FFR(a) = 0.86 FFR(q) + 0.05; r = 0.90; P < 0.0001). The quantification of CFR and relative FFR(a) using angiographic image data was validated in a swine model. This angiographic technique can potentially be used for coronary physiological assessment during routine cardiac catheterization.     

Tying with thread of the rat coronary arteries, a method for the production of experimental coronary stenosis]

A method is described for producing a localized coronary artery stenosis by tieing two threads around the Ramus descendens of the left coronary artery, which produces progressive cell proliferation of the vascular wall. Studies on 102 male Wistar rats (70 experimental and 32 sham-operated control animals) have shown coronary artery stenosis narrowing the lumen by more than 50% (up to and exceeding 90%) to develop after 7 days in 30% of the animals, after 14 days in 75%, and after 21 days (postoperatively) in 100%. In about one-third of the cases subtotal infarction in the supply area of the left coronary artery occured as a result of post-operative damage to the coronary artery with obturating thrombosis. The induction of effective coronary stenosis limiting the coronary reserve offers possibilities for further experimental studies on the role of relative coronary insufficiency in the pathogenesis of myocardial infarction.