Agonist-biased Trafficking of Somatostatin Receptor 2A in Enteric Neurons

Somatostatin (SST) 14 and SST 28 activate somatostatin 2A receptors (SSTR2A) on enteric neurons to control gut functions. SST analogs are treatments of neuroendocrine and bleeding disorders, cancer, and diarrhea, with gastrointestinal side effects of constipation, abdominal pain, and nausea. How endogenous agonists and drugs differentially regulate neuronal SSTR2A is unexplored. We evaluated SSTR2A trafficking in murine myenteric neurons and neuroendocrine AtT-20 cells by microscopy and determined whether agonist degradation by endosomal endothelin-converting enzyme 1 (ECE-1) controls SSTR2A trafficking and association with β-arrestins, key regulators of receptors. SST-14, SST-28, and peptide analogs (octreotide, lanreotide, and vapreotide) stimulated clathrin- and dynamin-mediated internalization of SSTR2A, which colocalized with ECE-1 in endosomes and the Golgi. After incubation with SST-14, SSTR2A recycled to the plasma membrane, which required active ECE-1 and an intact Golgi. SSTR2A activated by SST-28, octreotide, lanreotide, or vapreotide was retained within the Golgi and did not recycle. Although ECE-1 rapidly degraded SST-14, SST-28 was resistant to degradation, and ECE-1 did not degrade SST analogs. SST-14 and SST-28 induced transient interactions between SSTR2A and β-arrestins that were stabilized by an ECE-1 inhibitor. Octreotide induced sustained SSTR2A/β-arrestin interactions that were not regulated by ECE-1. Thus, when activated by SST-14, SSTR2A internalizes and recycles via the Golgi, which requires ECE-1 degradation of SST-14 and receptor dissociation from β-arrestins. After activation by ECE-1-resistant SST-28 and analogs, SSTR2A remains in endosomes because of sustained β-arrestin interactions. Therapeutic SST analogs are ECE-1-resistant and retain SSTR2A in endosomes, which may explain their long-lasting actions.     

Site-Specific Phosphorylation of VEGFR2 Is Mediated by Receptor Trafficking: Insights from a Computational Model

Matrix-binding isoforms and non-matrix-binding isoforms of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are both capable of stimulating vascular remodeling, but the resulting blood vessel networks are structurally and functionally different. Here, we develop and validate a computational model of the binding of soluble and immobilized ligands to VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2), the endosomal trafficking of VEGFR2, and site-specific VEGFR2 tyrosine phosphorylation to study differences in induced signaling between these VEGF isoforms. In capturing essential features of VEGFR2 signaling and trafficking, our model suggests that VEGFR2 trafficking parameters are largely consistent across multiple endothelial cell lines. Simulations demonstrate distinct localization of VEGFR2 phosphorylated on Y1175 and Y1214. This is the first model to clearly show that differences in site-specific VEGFR2 activation when stimulated with immobilized VEGF compared to soluble VEGF can be accounted for by altered trafficking of VEGFR2 without an intrinsic difference in receptor activation. The model predicts that Neuropilin-1 can induce differences in the surface-to-internal distribution of VEGFR2. Simulations also show that ligated VEGFR2 and phosphorylated VEGFR2 levels diverge over time following stimulation. Using this model, we identify multiple key levers that alter how VEGF binding to VEGFR2 results in different coordinated patterns of multiple downstream signaling pathways. Specifically, simulations predict that VEGF immobilization, interactions with Neuropilin-1, perturbations of VEGFR2 trafficking, and changes in expression or activity of phosphatases acting on VEGFR2 all affect the magnitude, duration, and relative strength of VEGFR2 phosphorylation on tyrosines 1175 and 1214, and they do so predictably within our single consistent model framework.     

An Antimicrobial Peptide Regulates Tumor-Associated Macrophage Trafficking via the Chemokine Receptor CCR2, a Model for Tumorigenesis

Background

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) constitute a significant part of infiltrating inflammatory cells that are frequently correlated with progression and poor prognosis of a variety of cancers. Tumor cell-produced human β-defensin-3 (hBD-3) has been associated with TAM trafficking in oral cancer; however, its involvement in tumor-related inflammatory processes remains largely unknown.

Methodology

The relationship between hBD-3, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), TAMs, and CCR2 was examined using immunofluorescence microscopy in normal and oral carcinoma in situ biopsy specimens. The ability of hBD-3 to chemoattract host macrophages in vivo using a nude mouse model and analysis of hBD-3 on monocytic cell migration in vitro, applying a cross-desensitization strategy of CCR2 and its pharmacological inhibitor (RS102895), respectively, was also carried out.

Conclusions/Findings

MCP-1, the most frequently expressed tumor cell-associated chemokine, was not produced by tumor cells nor correlated with the recruitment of macrophages in oral carcinoma in situ lesions. However, hBD-3 was associated with macrophage recruitment in these lesions and hBD-3-expressing tumorigenic cells induced massive tumor infiltration of host macrophages in nude mice. HBD-3 stimulated the expression of tumor-promoting cytokines, including interleukin-1α (IL-1α), IL-6, IL-8, CCL18, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in macrophages derived from human peripheral blood monocytes. Monocytic cell migration in response to hBD-3 was inhibited by cross-desensitization with MCP-1 and the specific CCR2 inhibitor, RS102895, suggesting that CCR2 mediates monocyte/macrophage migration in response to hBD-3. Collectively, these results indicate that hBD-3 utilizes CCR2 to regulate monocyte/macrophage trafficking and may act as a tumor cell-produced chemoattractant to recruit TAMs. This novel mechanism is the first evidence of an hBD molecule orchestrating an in vivo outcome and demonstrates the importance of the innate immune system in the development of tumors.     

Characterization of PXK as a Protein Involved in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Trafficking

The phox homology (PX) domain is a phosphoinositide-binding module that typically binds phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate. Out of 47 mammalian proteins containing PX domains, more than 30 are denoted sorting nexins and several of these have been implicated in internalization of cell surface proteins to the endosome, where phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate is concentrated. Here we investigated a multimodular protein termed PXK, composed of a PX domain, a protein kinase-like domain, and a WASP homology 2 domain. We show that the PX domain of PXK localizes this protein to the endosomal membrane via binding to phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate. PXK expression in COS7 cells accelerated the ligand-induced internalization and degradation of epidermal growth factor receptors by a mechanism requiring phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate binding but not involving the WASP homology 2 domain. Conversely, depletion of PXK using RNA interference decreased the rate of epidermal growth factor receptor internalization and degradation. Ubiquitination of epidermal growth factor receptor by the ligand stimulation was enhanced in PXK-expressing cells. These results indicate that PXK plays a critical role in epidermal growth factor receptor trafficking through modulating ligand-induced ubiquitination of the receptor.Both constitutive endocytosis and activated endocytosis are highly regulated events by which cells take up nutrients and internalize receptors for recycling or degradation (47). Endocytosed molecules are delivered to early endosomes, where the components are sorted to the cell surface for recycling back to the plasma membrane, or to late endosomes to be degraded in lysosomes (17). The molecular mechanisms regulating these events are not fully understood.One of the major protein families involved in the trafficking of membrane compartments is sorting nexins (SNXs), which are characterized by the presence of phox homology (PX) domains (8, 65). The PX domain is a protein module which consists of approximately 130 amino acids with three β-strands followed by three α-helices forming a helical subdomain, and the general function of this module is to interact with the head groups of inositol phospholipids through which parental proteins are targeted to specific cellular compartments. Most of the SNXs examined to date specifically recognize phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate [PtdIns(3)P], which is found predominately in early endosomes (11). The founding member of the SNX family, SNX1, was initially identified as an interaction partner of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and the expression of SNX1 enhanced lysosomal degradation of EGFR (38); therefore, SNXs are most likely to be involved in the trafficking of many different families of receptors which are recycled to the cell surface or sent to the lysosome for degradation (19). On the other hand, PX domain-containing proteins have also been reported to bind to phosphoinositides other than PtdIns(3)P and to have functions independent of receptor trafficking (54). For example, phospholipase D is a PX domain-containing protein that hydrolyzes phosphatidylcholine to produce a second-messenger molecule, phosphatidic acid. Interestingly, phospholipase D has been recently shown to accelerate EGFR endocytosis by activating dynamin GTPase through its PX domain but independently of lipase activity (39). Cytokine-independent survival kinase (CISK) is a PX domain-containing protein kinase that has also been shown to regulate sorting of a chemokine receptor CXCR4 through AIP4, the CXCR4 ubiquitin ligase (60). RGS-PX1, a GTPase-activating protein for Gαs of heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins, and KIF16B, a PX domain-containing kinesin superfamily member, have been shown to regulate EGFR trafficking (27, 72) and are now grouped into the SNX family as SNX13 and SNX26, respectively.Another feature of the PX domain is a well-conserved polyproline sequence (PXXP) in the variable loop between α1 and α2 helices, which led to the original identification of the PX domain as a SH3 domain-binding partner (53). The physiological importance of both intermolecular and intramolecular interactions mediated by polyproline sequences has been shown in various molecules, including phospholipase D2 (33) and p47^phox (1). In mammals, there are currently 47 proteins harboring PX domains, and 30 proteins are termed SNXs (59). The functions of these proteins have just begun to be revealed.Actin cytoskeletal dynamics have been implicated not only in cell motility and cytokinesis but also in endocytic processes, although the necessity and role in endocytosis in higher eukaryotic cells remain ambiguous (12, 34, 35, 55). The WASP homology 2 (WH2) domain is known as an actin-binding motif found in regulators of the actin cytoskeleton, including Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP), Scar/WASP-family verprolin-homologous protein (WAVE), verprolin/WASP-interacting protein (WIP), missing in metastasis (MIM), and β-thymosins (52). Some proteins with WH2 domains, such as β-thymosin, prevent actin filament assembly by sequestering actin monomers, while others, such as N-WASP and the Drosophila protein Ciboulot participate in barbed-end actin assembly (52). Recently, the structural basis for these opposite functions of WH2 domains was demonstrated; the interaction of the C-terminal region of β-thymosin/WH2 domain with the pointed end of the actin monomer accounts for the switch in function from inhibition to promotion of actin assembly (26). WH2 domains exist in almost 20 proteins, whose functions remain to be clarified.In the present study, we isolated a new multimodular protein (termed PXK), conserved in multicellular organisms including humans through flies, which possesses a PX domain, a protein kinase-like domain, and a WH2 domain. We show that the PX and WH2 domains function as PtdIns(3)P and actin-binding domains, respectively. PXK expression in COS cells accelerated ligand-induced EGFR endocytosis and degradation that was dependent on a functional PX domain but independent of the WH2 domain. PXK also enhanced ubiquitination of EGFR induced by EGF stimulation in these cells. Based on these results, we propose that PXK is a functional sorting nexin that may play an additional role in cellular function via its interaction with the actin cytoskeleton.     

A Topological Model of the NMDA-Glycine Receptor Model

Abstract

On the basis of known studies disclosing different reciprocal modulations of the Glycine and NMDA binding at the level of the NMDA-Glycine-PCP receptor complex, we have developed a topological model able to take into account many of these observations.     

A GIPC1-Palmitate Switch Modulates Dopamine Drd3 Receptor Trafficking and Signaling

Palmitoylation is involved in several neuropsychiatric and movement disorders for which a dysfunctional signaling of the dopamine D3 receptor (Drd3) is hypothesized. Computational modeling of Drd3''s homologue, Drd2, has shed some light on the putative role of palmitoylation as a reversible switch for dopaminergic receptor signaling. Drd3 is presumed to be palmitoylated, based on sequence homology with Drd2, but the functional attributes afforded by Drd3 palmitoylation have not been studied. Since these receptors are major targets of antipsychotic and anti-Parkinsonian drugs, a better characterization of Drd3 signaling and posttranslational modifications, like palmitoylation, may improve the prospects for drug development. Using molecular dynamics simulations, we evaluated in silico how Drd3 palmitoylation could elicit significant remodeling of the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain to expose docking sites for signaling proteins. We tested this model in cellulo by using the interaction of Drd3 with the G-alpha interacting protein (GAIP) C terminus 1 (GIPC1) as a template. From a series of biochemical studies, live imaging, and analyses of mutant proteins, we propose that Drd3 palmitoylation acts as a molecular switch for Drd3-biased signaling via a GIPC1-dependent route, which is likely to affect the mode of action of antipsychotic drugs.     

Functional Consequences of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Cross-talk and Trafficking

The signaling capacity of seven-transmembrane/G-protein-coupled receptors (7TM/GPCRs) can be regulated through ligand-mediated receptor trafficking. Classically, the recycling of internalized receptors is associated with resensitization, whereas receptor degradation terminates signaling. We have shown previously that the incretin glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) internalizes fast and is primarily resensitized through recycling back to the cell surface. GLP-1R is expressed in pancreatic islets together with the closely related glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIPR) and glucagon (GCGR) receptors. The interaction and cross-talk between coexpressed receptors is a wide phenomenon of the 7TM/GPCR superfamily. Numerous reports show functional consequences for signaling and trafficking of the involved receptors. On the basis of the high structural similarity and tissue coexpression, we here investigated the potential cross-talk between GLP-1R and GIPR or GCGR in both trafficking and signaling pathways. Using a real-time time-resolved FRET-based internalization assay, we show that GLP-1R, GIPR, and GCGR internalize with differential properties. Remarkably, upon coexpression of the internalizing GLP-1R and the non-internalizing GIPR, GLP-1-mediated GLP-1R internalization was impaired in a GIPR concentration-dependent manner. As a functional consequence of such impaired internalization capability, GLP-1-mediated GLP-1R signaling was abrogated. A similar compromised signaling was found when GLP-1R internalization was abrogated by a dominant-negative version of dynamin (dynamin-1 K44E), which provides a mechanistic link between GLP-1R trafficking and signaling. This study highlights the importance of receptor internalization for full functionality of GLP-1R. Moreover, cross-talk between the two incretin receptors GLP-1R and GIPR is shown to alter receptor trafficking with functional consequences for GLP-1R signaling.     

Effects of Membrane Trafficking on Signaling by Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

The intracellular trafficking machinery contributes to the spatial and temporal control of signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). The primary role in this process is played by endocytic trafficking, which regulates the localization of RTKs and their downstream effectors, as well as the duration and the extent of their activity. The key regulatory points along the endocytic pathway are internalization of RTKs from the plasma membrane, their sorting to degradation or recycling, and their residence in various endosomal compartments. Here I will review factors and mechanisms that modulate RTK signaling by (1) affecting receptor internalization, (2) regulating the balance between degradation and recycling of RTK, and (3) compartmentalization of signals in endosomes and other organelles. Cumulatively, these mechanisms illustrate a multilayered control of RTK signaling exerted by the trafficking machinery.At the cellular level, receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) need to be properly localized to function as signal-receiving and signal-transmitting devices (Lemmon and Schlessinger 2010). To receive signals (i.e., to bind extracellular ligands), RTKs have to be exposed at the surface of the plasma membrane. To transmit signals after ligand binding by RTKs, appropriate signaling components have to be available within intracellular compartments: in the cytoplasm, in association with membrane-bound organelles and in the cell nucleus. Importantly, the intracellular distribution of RTKs and their associated partners is not static but undergoes dynamic changes in different phases of signaling, as reflected for example by endocytic internalization of activated RTKs (Scita and Di Fiore 2010). Therefore, to function properly, the whole RTK signaling machinery within the cell has to be organized and tightly controlled both in space and in time. This organization and control are ensured by intracellular trafficking machineries, mainly by membrane transport systems such as endocytosis and secretion but also by other distribution systems (e.g., responsible for nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of proteins).Recent years have brought increasing evidence that intracellular membrane trafficking, in particular endocytic internalization, degradation, and recycling, can profoundly affect the signaling properties of RTKs (Mukherjee et al. 2006; Abella and Park 2009; Lemmon and Schlessinger 2010; Scita and Di Fiore 2010; Grecco et al. 2011; Sigismund et al. 2012). The changes in the amounts of RTKs at the cell surface can alter the cellular responses when ligands are abundant (Grecco et al. 2011). In turn, the presence of a given RTK at the plasma membrane is determined by the rates of three trafficking processes: delivery of newly synthesized molecules by the secretory pathway, their internalization (occurring for both ligand-bound and ligand-free molecules), and endocytic recycling. Although the molecular details concerning the regulation of RTK delivery to the plasma membrane are not well known, numerous studies document various mechanisms by which internalization and recycling of RTKs can be modulated, thus affecting the signaling outputs (Le Roy and Wrana 2005). In addition to the regulation of RTKs at the cell surface, trafficking processes control the intracellular fate of endocytosed RTKs. Following internalization, RTKs can be either targeted for lysosomal degradation, or recycled back to the plasma membrane (Mukherjee et al. 2006; Abella and Park 2009; Scita and Di Fiore 2010). The first route results in the termination of signaling, whereas the second allows for sustained signaling if the ligand is available. Usually degradation and recycling of a given RTK can occur simultaneously but the balance between them is crucial to determine the net signaling output. Again, the molecular mechanisms that can shift the fate of internalized RTKs between degradation and recycling, thus changing RTK signaling, have begun to emerge in recent years (Polo and Di Fiore 2006; von Zastrow and Sorkin 2007; Sorkin and von Zastrow 2009; Sigismund et al. 2012). Finally, in contrast to an early view that only RTKs present at the plasma membrane are signaling competent, it is now accepted that in many cases activated RTKs can emit signals also after internalization into intracellular compartments (Miaczynska et al. 2004b; Miaczynska and Bar-Sagi 2010; Platta and Stenmark 2011). In some cell types (e.g., in neurons), such “signaling endosomes” are crucial for signal propagation within the cell and for the final cellular response. Moreover, endosomes can serve as platforms for amplification and compartmentalization of signals emitted by RTKs (Sadowski et al. 2009; Platta and Stenmark 2011).In this article, I will review factors and mechanisms that modulate RTK signaling by (1) affecting receptor internalization, (2) regulating the balance between degradation and recycling of RTK, and (3) compartmentalization of signals in endosomes and other organelles. As the membrane trafficking system of a cell is highly interconnected and can be considered a global dynamic continuum, it is important to note that often one primary alteration at a given stage of RTK trafficking may affect other transport steps or compartments, thus causing generalized changes in the intracellular routing and signaling of RTKs.     

Regulation of Insulin Receptor Trafficking by Bardet Biedl Syndrome Proteins

Insulin and its receptor are critical for the regulation of metabolic functions, but the mechanisms underlying insulin receptor (IR) trafficking to the plasma membrane are not well understood. Here, we show that Bardet Biedl Syndrome (BBS) proteins are necessary for IR localization to the cell surface. We demonstrate that the IR interacts physically with BBS proteins, and reducing the expression of BBS proteins perturbs IR expression in the cell surface. We show the consequence of disrupting BBS proteins for whole body insulin action and glucose metabolism using mice lacking different BBS genes. These findings demonstrate the importance of BBS proteins in underlying IR cell surface expression. Our data identify defects in trafficking and localization of the IR as a novel mechanism accounting for the insulin resistance commonly associated with human BBS. This is supported by the reduced surface expression of the IR in fibroblasts derived from patients bearing the M390R mutation in the BBS1 gene.     

Dimerization of the Polymeric Immunoglobulin Receptor Controls Its Transcytotic Trafficking

Binding of dimeric immunoglobulin (Ig)A to the polymeric Ig receptor (pIgR) stimulates transcytosis of pIgR across epithelial cells. Through the generation of a series of pIgR chimeric constructs, we have tested the ability of ligand to promote receptor dimerization and the subsequent role of receptor dimerization on its intracellular trafficking. Using the cytoplasmic domain of the T cell receptor-ζ chain as a sensitive indicator of receptor oligomerization, we show that a pIgR:ζ chimeric receptor expressed in Jurkat cells initiates a ζ-specific signal transduction cascade when exposed to dimeric or tetrameric IgA, but not when exposed to monomeric IgA. In addition, we replaced the pIgR’s transmembrane domain with that of glycophorin A to force dimerization or with a mutant glycophorin transmembrane domain to prevent dimerization. Forcing dimerization stimulated transcytosis of the chimera, whereas preventing dimerization abolished ligand-stimulated transcytosis. We conclude that binding of dimeric IgA to the pIgR induces its dimerization and that this dimerization is necessary and sufficient to stimulate pIgR transcytosis.     

The Effect of Desflurane on Neuronal Communication at a Central Synapse

Although general anesthetics are thought to modify critical neuronal functions, their impact on neuronal communication has been poorly examined. We have investigated the effect induced by desflurane, a clinically used general anesthetic, on information transfer at the synapse between mossy fibers and granule cells of cerebellum, where this analysis can be carried out extensively. Mutual information values were assessed by measuring the variability of postsynaptic output in relationship to the variability of a given set of presynaptic inputs. Desflurane synchronized granule cell firing and reduced mutual information in response to physiologically relevant mossy fibers patterns. The decrease in spike variability was due to an increased postsynaptic membrane excitability, which made granule cells more prone to elicit action potentials, and to a strengthened synaptic inhibition, which markedly hampered membrane depolarization. These concomitant actions on granule cells firing indicate that desflurane re-shapes the transfer of information between neurons by providing a less informative neurotransmission rather than completely silencing neuronal activity.     

Dysregulation of ErbB Receptor Trafficking and Signaling in Demyelinating Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease

Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease is the most common inherited peripheral neuropathy with the majority of cases involving demyelination of peripheral nerves. The pathogenic mechanisms of demyelinating CMT remain unclear, and no effective therapy currently exists for this disease. The discovery that mutations in different genes can cause a similar phenotype of demyelinating peripheral neuropathy raises the possibility that there may be convergent mechanisms leading to demyelinating CMT pathogenesis. Increasing evidence indicates that ErbB receptor-mediated signaling plays a major role in the control of Schwann cell-axon communication and myelination in the peripheral nervous system. Recent studies reveal that several demyelinating CMT-linked proteins are novel regulators of endocytic trafficking and/or phosphoinositide metabolism that may affect ErbB receptor signaling. Emerging data have begun to suggest that dysregulation of ErbB receptor trafficking and signaling in Schwann cells may represent a common pathogenic mechanism in multiple subtypes of demyelinating CMT. In this review, we focus on the roles of ErbB receptor trafficking and signaling in regulation of peripheral nerve myelination and discuss the emerging evidence supporting the potential involvement of altered ErbB receptor trafficking and signaling in demyelinating CMT pathogenesis and the possibility of modulating these trafficking and signaling processes for treating demyelinating peripheral neuropathy.     

Differential Regulation of GABAB Receptor Trafficking by Different Modes of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) Receptor Signaling

Inhibitory GABA_B receptors (GABA_BRs) can down-regulate most excitatory synapses in the CNS by reducing postsynaptic excitability. Functional GABA_BRs are heterodimers of GABA_B1 and GABA_B2 subunits and here we show that the trafficking and surface expression of GABA_BRs is differentially regulated by synaptic or pathophysiological activation of NMDA receptors (NMDARs). Activation of synaptic NMDARs using a chemLTP protocol increases GABA_BR recycling and surface expression. In contrast, excitotoxic global activation of synaptic and extrasynaptic NMDARs by bath application of NMDA causes the loss of surface GABA_BRs. Intriguingly, exposing neurons to extreme metabolic stress using oxygen/glucose deprivation (OGD) increases GABA_B1 but decreases GABA_B2 surface expression. The increase in surface GABA_B1 involves enhanced recycling and is blocked by the NMDAR antagonist AP5. The decrease in surface GABA_B2 is also blocked by AP5 and by inhibiting degradation pathways. These results indicate that NMDAR activity is critical in GABA_BR trafficking and function and that the individual subunits can be separately controlled to regulate neuronal responsiveness and survival.     

Monte Carlo Simulation of Buffered Diffusion into and out of a Model Synapse

Buffered diffusion occurs when ligands enter or leave a restricted space, such as a chemical synapse, containing a high density of binding sites. This study used Monte Carlo simulations to determine the time and spatial dependences of buffered diffusion without a priori assumptions about kinetics. The synapse was modeled as a box with receptors on one inner face. The exterior was clamped to some ligand concentration and ligands diffused through two sides. Onset and recovery simulations were carried out and the effects of receptor density, ligand properties and synapse geometry were investigated. This study determined equilibration times for binding and the spatial gradient of unliganded receptors. Onset was characterized by a high spatial gradient; equilibration was limited by the time needed for sufficient ligands to enter the synapse. Recovery showed a low spatial gradient with receptor equilibration limited by ligand rebinding. Decreasing ligand association rate or increasing ligand diffusion coefficient reduced the role of buffered diffusion and decreased the spatial gradient. Simulations with irreversible ligands showed larger, persistent spatial gradients. These simulations identify characteristics that can be used to test whether a synaptic process is governed by buffered diffusion. They also indicate that fundamental differences in synapse function may occur with irreversible ligands.     

The Deubiquitinating Enzyme USP8 Promotes Trafficking and Degradation of the Chemokine Receptor 4 at the Sorting Endosome

Reversible ubiquitination orchestrated by the opposition of ubiquitin ligases and deubiquitinating enzymes mediates endocytic trafficking of cell surface receptors for lysosomal degradation. Ubiquitin-specific protease 8 (USP8) has previously been implicated in endocytosis of several receptors by virtue of their deubiquitination. The present study explores an indirect role for USP8 in cargo trafficking through its regulation of the chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4). Contrary to the effects of USP8 loss on enhanced green fluorescent protein, we find that USP8 depletion stabilizes CXCR4 on the cell surface and attenuates receptor degradation without affecting its ubiquitination status. In the presence of ligand, diminished CXCR4 turnover is accompanied by receptor accumulation on enlarged early endosomes and leads to enhancement of phospho-ERK signaling. Perturbation in CXCR4 trafficking, resulting from USP8 inactivation, occurs at the ESCRT-0 checkpoint, and catalytic mutation of USP8 specifically targeted to the ESCRT-0 complex impairs the spatial and temporal organization of the sorting endosome. USP8 functionally opposes the ubiquitin ligase AIP4 with respect to ESCRT-0 ubiquitination, thereby promoting trafficking of CXCR4. Collectively, our findings demonstrate a functional cooperation between USP8, AIP4, and the ESCRT-0 machinery at the early sorting phase of CXCR4 and underscore the versatility of USP8 in shaping trafficking events at the early-to-late endosome transition.     

A Matter of Balance: Role of Neurexin and Neuroligin at the Synapse

Neurexins and neuroligins are synaptic cell adhesion molecules. Neurexins are primary located on the presynaptic membrane, whereas neuroligins are strictly postsynaptic proteins. Since their discovery, the knowledge of neurexins and neuroligins has expanded, implicating them in various neuronal processes, including the differentiation, maturation, stabilization, and plasticity of both inhibitory and excitatory synapses. Here, we review the most recent results regarding the structure and function of these cell adhesion molecules.     

Durable Interactions of T Cells with T Cell Receptor Stimuli in the Absence of a Stable Immunological Synapse

1. Download high-res image (140KB)
2. Download full-size image