Aluminum Interactions with Voltage-Dependent Calcium Transport in Plasma Membrane Vesicles Isolated from Roots of Aluminum-Sensitive and -Resistant Wheat Cultivars

The role of Al interactions with root-cell plasma membrane (PM) Ca2+ channels in Al toxicity and resistance was studied. The experimental approach involved the imposition of a transmembrane electrical potential (via K+ diffusion) in right-side-out PM vesicles derived from roots of two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars (Al-sensitive Scout 66 and Al-resistant Atlas 66). We previously used this technique to characterize a voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel in the wheat root PM (J.W. Huang, D.L. Grunes, L.V. Kochian [1994] Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 3473-3477). We found that Al3+ effectively blocked this PM Ca2+ channel; however, Al3+ blocked this Ca2+ channel equally well in both the Al-sensitive and -resistant cultivars. It was found that the differential genotypic sensitivity of this Ca2+ transport system to Al in intact roots versus isolated PM vesicles was due to Al-induced malate exudation localized to the root apex in Al-resistant Atlas but not in Al-sensitive Scout. Because malate can effectively chelate Al3+ in the rhizosphere and exclude it from the root apex, the differential sensitivity of Ca2+ influx to Al in intact roots of Al-resistant versus Al-sensitive wheat cultivars is probably due to the maintenance of lower Al3+ activities in the root apical rhizosphere of the resistant cultivar.     

Aluminium triggers malate-independent potassium release via ion channels from the root apex in wheat

The regulatory mechanisms for the aluminium (Al)-induced efflux of K(+) and malate from the root apex of Al-resistant wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Atlas) were characterized. Treatment with 20 mM tetraethylammonium (TEA) chloride, a K(+)-channel inhibitor, blocked the Al-induced K(+) efflux by 65%, but blocked the Al-induced malate efflux only slightly. Lanthanum (La(3+)) or ytterbium (Yb(3+)) strongly inhibited the K(+) efflux, but slightly increased malate efflux. These lanthanides applied together with Al did not affect the Al-induced malate efflux, but reduced the Al-induced K(+) efflux by 57% for La(3+) and by 35% for Yb(3+). By contrast, pretreatment with 50 microM niflumic acid, an anion-channel inhibitor, strongly suppressed the Al-induced malate efflux, but did not affect the Al-induced K(+) efflux. The efflux of K(+) uncoupled with that of malate resulted in the alkalization of intracellular pH in the root apex, suggesting that the release of K(+) coupled with malate plays an important role in stabilizing intracellular pH. Copper (Cu(2+)) induced the release of K(+) via a TEA-insensitive pathway without the release of malate in both Al-resistant and Al-sensitive (cultivar Scout) wheat. Simultaneous application of Al and Cu(2+) to the root apices resulted in TEA-sensitive K(+) efflux in Atlas but not in Scout, suggesting that Al competes with Cu(2+) for K(+) efflux. Taken together, these results suggest that Al-induced K(+) efflux is mediated by both TEA- and lanthanide-sensitive K(+) channels, although this induction is not a prerequisite for the induction of the release of malate.     

Differential effects of aluminium on osmotic potential and sugar accumulation in the root cells of Al-resistant and Al-sensitive wheat

The changes in osmotic potential and the concentration of osmotic solutes in the cell sap of the root tips exposed to Al were examined in two cultivars of wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) differing in Al resistance. Root elongation was less influenced by an 8-h exposure to 20 μ M or 50 μ M Al in Al-resistant cv. Atlas 66 than in Al-sensitive cv. Scout 66. After Al treatment the osmotic potential of the root cells was decreased in Atlas 66 but increased in Scout 66 indicating that the Al treatment osmotically stimulated the driving force for water uptake in Atlas 66 but suppressed it in Scout 66. Al increased the concentration of soluble sugars, the major osmotic solute in the root cells in Atlas 66, but decreased it in Scout 66. Al at both low (5 μ M ) and high (50 μ M ) concentrations, also increased the concentration of soluble sugars in the Al-resistant genotype ET8 but a high Al concentration decreased it in Al-sensitive genotype ES8. Enzymatic analyses and thin-layer chromatography revealed that soluble sugars in the root cells of both Atlas 66 and Scout 66 mainly consisted of monosaccharides such as glucose, fructose and a small amount of sucrose. These results suggest that the accumulation of soluble sugars in Al-resistant wheat Atlas 66 keeps the osmotic potential in the root cells low and thus, enables the root cells to take up water and to elongate against the pressure produced by cell wall rigidification under Al stress.     

Possible Involvement of Al-Induced Electrical Signals in Al Tolerance in Wheat

The relationship between Al-induced depolarization of root-cell transmembrane electrical potentials (Em) and Al tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) was investigated. Al exposure induced depolarizations of Em in the Al-tolerant wheat cultivars Atlas and ET3, but not in the Al-sensitive wheat cultivars Scout and ES3. The depolarizations of Em occured in root cap cells and as far back as 10 mm from the root tip. The depolarization was specific to Al3+; no depolarization was observed when roots were exposed to the rhizotoxic trivalent cation La3+. The Al-induced depolarization occurred in the presence of anion-channel antagonists that blocked the release of malate, indicating that the depolarization is not due to the electrogenic efflux of malate2-. K+-induced depolarizations in the root cap were of the same magnitude as Al-induced depolarizations, but did not trigger malate release, indicating that Al-induced depolarization of root cap cell membrane potentials is probably linked to, but is not sufficient to trigger, malate release.     

Differential Exudation of Polypeptides by Roots of Aluminum-Resistant and Aluminum-Sensitive Cultivars of Triticum aestivum L. in Response to Aluminum Stress

Cultivars of Triticum aestivum differing in resistance to Al were grown under aseptic conditions in the presence and absence of Al and polypeptides present in root exudates were collected, concentrated, and analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Upon exposure to 100 and 200 [mu]M Al, root elongation in Al-sensitive cultivars was reduced by 30 and 65%, respectively, whereas root elongation in resistant cultivars was reduced by only 15 and 30%. Accumulation of polypeptides in the growth medium increased with time for 96 to 120 h, with little additional accumulation thereafter. This pattern of exudation was virtually unaffected by exposure to 100 [mu]M Al in the Al-resistant cultivars Atlas 66 and Maringa, whereas total accumulation was reduced in sensitive cultivars. Changes in exudation were consistent with alterations in root elongation. Al-induced or Al-enhanced polypeptide bands were detected in Atlas 66 and Maringa after 72 h of exposure to Al. Increased accumulation of 12-, 22-, and 33-kD bands was observed at 75 [mu]M Al in Atlas 66 and 12-, 23-, and 43.5-kD bands started to appear at 50 [mu]M Al in Maringa. In the Al-sensitive cultivars Roblin and Katepwa, no significant effect on polypeptide profiles was observed at values up to 100 [mu]M Al. When root exudates were separated by ultrafiltration and the Al content was measured in both high molecular mass (HMM; >10 kD) and ultrafiltrate (<10 kD) fractions, approximately 2 times more Al was detected in HMM fractions from Al-resistant cultivars than from Al-sensitive cultivars. Dialysis of HMM fractions against water did not release this bound Al;digestion with protease released between 62 and 73% of total Al, with twice as much released from exudates of Al-resistant than of Al-sensitive cultivars. When plants were grown in the presence of 0 to 200 [mu]M Al, saturation of the Al-binding capacity of HMM exudates occurred at 50 [mu]M Al in Al-sensitive cultivars. Saturation was not achieved in resistant cultivars. Differences in exudation of total polypeptides in response to Al stress, enhanced accumulation of specific polypeptides, and the greater association of Al with HMM fractions from Al-resistant cultivars suggest that root exudate polypeptides may play a role in plant response to Al.     

Changes in cell-wall properties of wheat (Triticum aestivum) roots during aluminum-induced growth inhibition

The effects of aluminum (Al) on root elongation, the mechanical extensibility of the cell wall, and the amount of cell-wall polysaccharides in the roots of Al-resistant (Atlas 66) and Al-sensitive (Scout 66) cultivars of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) were examined. Exposure to 10 μ M AlCl₃ for 6 h inhibited root elongation in Scout 66 but not in Atlas 66. It also decreased the mechanical extensibility of the cell wall in the roots of both cultivars, but prominently only in the roots of Scout 66. The amount of hemicellulose in the 10-mm region of root apex of Scout 66 was increased by the exposure to Al, especially in the apical regions. Al did not influence the neutral sugar composition of either pectin or hemicellulose in Scout 66 roots. However, Al increased the weight-average molecular mass of hemicellulosic polysaccharides and the amounts of wall-bound ferulic and diferulic acids in Scout 66 roots. These findings suggest that Al modifies the metabolism of cell-wall components and thus makes the cell wall thick and rigid, thereby inhibiting the growth of wheat roots.     

Aluminum resistance of cowpea as affected by phosphorus-deficiency stress

Plants growing in acid soils suffer both phosphorus (P) deficiency and aluminum (Al) toxicity stresses. Selection of genotypes for adaptation to either P deficiency or Al toxicity has sometimes been unsuccessful because these two soil factors often interact. Two experiments were conducted to evaluate eight cowpea genotypes for Al resistance and to study the combined effect of P deficiency and Al toxicity stress on growth, P uptake, and organic acid anion exudation of two genotypes of contrasting Al resistance selected from the first experiment. Relative root inhibition by 30 μM Al ranged from 14% to 60% and differed significantly among the genotypes. Al significantly induced callose formation, particularly in Al-sensitive genotypes. P accumulation was significantly reduced (28% and 95%) by Al application for both the Al-resistant and the Al-sensitive genotypes. Al supply significantly enhanced malate release of root apices of both genotypes. However, the exudation rate was significantly higher in the Al-resistant genotype. P deprivation induced an enhanced malate exudation in the presence of Al only in the Al-resistant genotype IT89KD-391. Citrate exudation rate of the root apices was lower than malate exudation by a factor of about 10, and was primarily enhanced by P deficiency in both genotypes. Al treatment further enhanced citrate exudation in P-sufficient, but not in P-deficient plants. The level of citrate exudation was consistently higher in the Al-resistant genotype IT89KD-391 particularly in presence of Al.It is concluded that the Al-resistant genotype is better adapted to acid Al-toxic and P-deficient soils than the Al-sensitive genotype since both malate and citrate exudation were more enhanced by combined Al and P-deficiency stresses.     

Aluminum resistance in maize cannot be solely explained by root organic acid exudation. A comparative physiological study

Root apical aluminum (Al) exclusion via Al-activated root citrate exudation is widely accepted as the main Al-resistance mechanism operating in maize (Zea mays) roots. Nonetheless, the correlation between Al resistance and this Al-exclusion mechanism has not been tested beyond a very small number of Al-resistant and Al-sensitive maize lines. In this study, we conducted a comparative study of the physiology of Al resistance using six different maize genotypes that capture the range of maize Al resistance and differ significantly in their genetic background (three Brazilian and three North American genotypes). In these maize lines, we were able to establish a clear correlation between root tip Al exclusion (based on root Al content) and Al resistance. Both Al-resistant genotypes and three of the four Al-sensitive lines exhibited a significant Al-activated citrate exudation, with no evidence for Al activation of root malate or phosphate release. There was a lack of correlation between differential Al resistance and root citrate exudation for the six maize genotypes; in fact, one of the Al-sensitive lines, Mo17, had the largest Al-activated citrate exudation of all of the maize lines. Our results indicate that although root organic acid release may play a role in maize Al resistance, it is clearly not the only or the main resistance mechanism operating in these maize roots. A number of other potential Al-resistance mechanisms were investigated, including release of other Al-chelating ligands, Al-induced alkalinization of rhizosphere pH, changes in internal levels of Al-chelating compounds in the root, and Al translocation to the shoot. However, we were unsuccessful in identifying additional Al-resistance mechanisms in maize. It is likely that a purely physiological approach may not be sufficient to identify these novel Al-resistance mechanisms in maize and this will require an interdisciplinary approach integrating genetic, molecular, and physiological investigations.     

Aluminum Effects on Calcium (45Ca2+) Translocation in Aluminum-Tolerant and Aluminum-Sensitive Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cultivars (Differential Responses of the Root Apex versus Mature Root Regions)

The influence of Al exposure on long-distance Ca2+ translocation from specific root zones (root apex or mature root) to the shoot was studied in intact seedlings of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars (Al-tolerant Atlas 66 and Al-sensitive Scout 66). Seedlings were grown in 100 [mu]M CaCl2 solution (pH 4.5) for 3 d. Subsequently, a divided chamber technique using 45Ca2+-labeled solutions (100 [mu]M CaCl2 with or without 5 or 20 [mu]M AlCl3, pH 4.5) was used to study Ca2+ translocation from either the terminal 5 to 10 mm of the root or a 10-mm region of intact root approximately 50 mm behind the root apex. The Al concentrations used, which were toxic to Scout 66, caused a significant inhibition of Ca2+ translocation from the apical region of Scout 66 roots. The same Al exposures had a much smaller effect on root apical Ca2+ translocation in Atlas 66. When a 10-mm region of the mature root was exposed to 45Ca2+, smaller genotypic differences in the Al effects effects on Ca2+ translocation were observed, because the degree of Al-induced inhibition of Ca2+ translocation was less than that at the root apex. Exposure of the root apex to Al inhibited root elongation by 70 to 99% in Scout 66 but had a lesser effect (less than 40% inhibition) in Atlas 66. When a mature root region was exposed to Al, root elongation was not significantly affected in either cultivar. These results demonstrate that genotypic differences in Al-induced inhibition of Ca2+ translocation and root growth are localized primarily in the root apex. The pattern of Ca2+ translocation within the intact root was mainly basipetal, with most of the absorbed Ca2+ translocated toward the shoot. A small amount of acropetal Ca2+ translocation from the mature root regions to the apex was also observed, which accounted for less than 5% of the total Ca2+ translocation within the entire root. Because Ca2+ translocation toward the root apex is limited, most of the Ca2+ needed for normal cellular function in the apex must be absorbed from the external solution. Thus, continuous Al disruption of Ca2+ absorption into cells of the root apex could alter Ca2+ nutrition and homeostasis in these cells and could play a pivotal role in the mechanisms of Al toxicity in Al-sensitive wheat cultivars.     

Involvement of multiple aluminium exclusion mechanisms in aluminium tolerance in wheat

The goal of this study was to determine if Al-chelators other than malate are released from root apices and are involved in Al-tolerance in different wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Also we wanted to establish if root exudates contribute to increases in rhizosphere pH around the root tip. In seedlings of Al-tolerant Atlas, we have documented a constitutive phosphate exudation from the root apex. Because phosphate can complex Al and bind protons, it could play an important role in Al tolerance, both via complexation of Al³⁺ and by contributing to the alkalinization of rhizosphere pH observed at the apex of Atlas. This study suggests that in wheat, Al-tolerance can be mediated by multiple exclusion mechanisms controlled by different genes.     

Aluminum targets elongating cells by reducing cell wall extensibility in wheat roots

Phytotoxicity of aluminum is characterized by a rapid inhibition of root elongation at micromolar concentrations, however, the mechanisms primarily responsible for this response are not well understood. We investigated the effect of Al on the viscosity and elasticity parameters of root cell wall by a creep-extension analysis in two cultivars of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) differing in Al resistance. The root elongation and both viscous and elastic extensibility of cell wall of the root apices were hardly affected by the exposure to 10 microM Al in an Al-resistant cultivar, Atlas 66. However, similar exposure rapidly inhibited root elongation in an Al-sensitive cultivar, Scout 66 and this was associated with a time-dependent accumulation of Al in the root tissues with more than 77% residing in the cell wall. Al caused a significant decrease in both the viscous and elastic extensibility of cell wall of the root apices of Scout 66. The "break load" of the root apex of Scout 66 was also decreased by Al. However, neither the viscosity nor elasticity of the cell wall was affected by in vitro Al treatment. Furthermore, pre-treatment of seedlings with Al in conditions where root elongation was slow (i.e. low temperature) did not affect the subsequent elongation of roots in a 0 Al treatment at room temperature. These results suggest that the Al-dependent changes in the cell wall viscosity and elasticity are involved in the inhibition of root growth. Furthermore, for Al to reduce cell wall extensibility it must interact with the cell walls of actively elongating cells.     

Possible involvement of protein phosphorylation in aluminum-responsive malate efflux from wheat root apex

In many plants, efflux of organic anions from roots has been proposed as one of the major Al resistance mechanisms. However it remains unknown how plants regulate efflux of organic anions in response to Al. In this study, the regulatory mechanisms of Al-responsive malate efflux in wheat (Triticum aestivum) were characterized focusing on the role of protein phosphorylation. Al-resistant wheat (cv Atlas) initiated malate efflux at 5 min after addition of Al, and this response was sensitive to temperature. K-252a, a broad range inhibitor of protein kinases, effectively blocked the Al-induced malate efflux accompanied with an increased accumulation of Al and intensified Al-induced root growth inhibition. A transient activation of a 48-kD protein kinase and an irreversible repression of a 42-kD protein kinase were observed preceding the initiation of malate efflux, and these changes were canceled by K-252a. Malate efflux was accompanied with a rapid decrease in the contents of organic anions in the root apex, such as citrate, succinate, and malate but with no change in the contents of inorganic anions such as chloride, nitrate, and phosphate. These results suggest that protein phosphorylation is involved in the Al-responsive malate efflux in the wheat root apex and that the organic anion-specific channel might be a terminal target that responds to Al signaling mediated by phosphorylation.     

Inhibition of growth and development of root border cells in wheat by Al

The production and development of border cells vary with genotype, and they are released in wheat at an earlier stage of root development than other species studied so far. No significant difference was observed in the maximum number of border cells between Al-tolerant (Atlas 66) and Al-sensitive (Scout 66) cultivars in the absence of Al treatment. Al seriously inhibited the production and release of border cells, resulting in clumping of border cells in Scout 66, but less clustering in Atlas 66. The number of border cells released from roots treated with Al is significantly less than that from roots grown without Al treatment. Al treatment induced the death of detached border cells in vitro and they were killed by a 20-h treatment with 25 µ m Al. No significant difference in survival percentage of detached border cells was observed between Atlas 66 and Scout 66, regardless of the presence or absence of Al. The removal of border cells from root tips of both Atlas 66 and Scout 66 enhanced the Al-induced inhibition of root elongation concomitant with increased Al accumulation in the root. These results suggest that border cells adhered to the root tips play a potential role in the protection of root from Al injury in wheat.     

Probing the “malate hypothesis” of differential aluminum tolerance in wheat by using other rhizotoxic ions as proxies for Al

An Al-stimulated efflux of malate from the root apex has been proposed as the primary mechanism whereby some wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes demonstrate marked resistance to the rhixotoxic metal Al. Appealing in its simplicity, the model has not been unequivocally validated, and suffers from some significant discrepancies between estimated, steady-state concentrations of malate at the root surface and concentrations that are necessary to explain the resistance of the superior genotypes. Using two other rhizotoxic ions that are also chelated by malate, Cu(II) and La(III), we specifically probed whether the quantities of malate released by tolerant genotypes could effectively detoxify Al. Experiments with exogenous additions of malate to solution showed that ≥200 μM malate is required to account for the difference between Scout 66 (Al-sensitive) and Atlas 66 (Al-tolerant) wheats, and that this level of malate can also partially alleviate the toxicities of Cu and La. When simultaneously exposed to a mildly rhizotoxic level of Al (25 μM) to induce malate efflux, Atlas exhibited a pronounced reduction in sensitivity to Cu. When, La was used as the proxy ion, however, no such Al-induced tolerance to La was observed, a result that refutes the significance of malate efflux to Al tolerance. Additional experiments using Al, Cu, and La in combination suggested that a trivalent ion can alleviate Cu toxicity directly (i.e. via competition for apoplastic binding), providing an alternative explanation for the ability of Al to detoxify Cu in Atlas. Using a weight-of-evidence approach, we argue that malate efflux plays at most a minor role in the differential Al tolerance of wheat, and that a more integrative, multifaceted model of tolerance is needed. Received: 14 August 1997 / Accepted: 26 November 1997     

Cell-wall pectin and its degree of methylation in the maize root-apex: significance for genotypic differences in aluminium resistance

Cell-wall (CW) pectin content and its degree of methylation in root apices of selected maize cultivars were studied in relation to genotypic Al resistance. Maize cultivars differing in Al resistance were grown in nutrient solution treated with or without Al, and pectin content of the root tips was determined. Control plants did not differ in pectin content in the 5 mm root apex. Al treatment increased the pectin content of the root apex in all cultivars but more prominently in the Al-sensitive cultivars. Pectin and Al contents in 1 mm root sections decreased from the apex to the 3–4 mm zone. Pectin contents of the apical root sections were consistently higher although significantly different only in the 1–2 mm zone in the Al-sensitive cv Lixis. Al contents in most root sections were significantly higher in cv Lixis than in Al-resistant cv ATP-Y. Localization of pectins by immunofluorescence revealed that Al-sensitive cv. Lixis has a higher proportion of low-methylated pectin and thus a higher negativity of the cell wall than Al-resistant cv ATP-Y. This is in agreement with the higher Al content and Al sensitivity of cv Lixis. It is concluded that differences in CW pectin and its degree of methylation contribute to genotypic differences in Al resistance in maize in addition to the release of organic acid anions previously reported.     

Identification of new sources of aluminum resistance in wheat

Aluminum (Al) toxicity is a major constraint for wheat production in acidic soils. An Al resistance gene on chromosome 4DL that traces to Brazilian wheat has been extensively studied, and can provide partial protection from Al damage. To identify potentially new sources of Al resistance, 590 wheat accessions, including elite wheat breeding lines from the United States and other American and European countries, landraces and commercial cultivars from East Asia, and synthetic wheat lines from CIMMYT, Mexico, were screened for Al resistance by measuring relative root elongation in culture with a nutrient solution containing Al, and by staining Al-stressed root tips with hematoxylin. Eighty-eight wheat accessions demonstrated at least moderate resistance to Al toxicity. Those selected lines were subjected to analysis of microsatellite markers linked to an Al resistance gene on 4DL and a gene marker for the Al-activated malate transporter (ALMT1) locus. Many of the selected Al-resistant accessions from East Asia did not have the Al-resistant marker alleles of ALMT1, although they showed Al resistance similar to the US Al-resistant cultivar, Atlas 66. Most of the cultivars derived from Jagger and Atlas 66 have the Al-resistant marker alleles of ALMT1. Cluster analysis separated the selected Al-resistant germplasm into two major clusters, labeled as Asian and American–European clusters. Potentially new germplasm of Al resistance different from those derived from Brazil were identified. Further investigation of Al resistance in those new germplasms may reveal alternative Al-resistance mechanisms in wheat. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Responsible Editor: Thomas B. Kinraide.     

A comparative study on the aluminium- and copper-induced organic acid exudation from wheat roots

It is well established that aluminium (Al) and some heavy metals can elicit organic acid exudation from a range of species. In the present research we found that copper (Cu) can also induce organic acid exudation from the roots of wheat, rye, triticale, maize and soybean. Using intact wheat plants, we made a comparative study of Al- and Cu- induced organic acid exudation. In 5-day-old wheat seedlings, severe Cu stress (40 µ M CuCl₂) mainly induced the exudation of malate and citrate, and Al-tolerant genotypes could release significantly greater amounts of malate than Al-sensitive genotypes. The time course of the exudation of malate and citrate from the roots of 5-day-old seedlings of wheat (cv. Atlas) in 200 µ M AlCl₃ was similar to that in 40 µ M CuCl₂. In older wheat plants (15-day-old), moderate Cu stress (12 µ M CuCl₂) induced the exudation of large amounts of citrate and addition of Al or La sharply reduced Cu-induced citrate exudation, while Cu or La did not affect Al-induced malate efflux. When half of the root system of Atlas wheat was immersed in Al- or Cu-containing solution and the remaining half in Al- or Cu-free solution, organic acids were only exuded into the solution containing Al or Cu. This suggests that no long distance signal transport is involved in organic acid exudation induced by Al or Cu, and that direct contact of Al or Cu with plant roots is a prerequisite for the induction of organic acid exudation. The anion-channel inhibitor niflumic acid (NIF) significantly stimulated the exudation of both citrate and malate from 5-day-old wheat seedlings under severe Al or Cu stress. Our results suggest that Cu-induced organic acid efflux may be a common response, which may play a role in alleviating Cu toxicity in plants.     

Aluminum tolerance of wheat does not induce changes in dominant bacterial community composition or abundance in an acidic soil

Aims

Aluminum-tolerant wheat plants often produce more root exudates such as malate and phosphate than aluminum-sensitive ones under aluminum (Al) stress, which provides environmental differences for microorganism growth in their rhizosphere soils. This study investigated whether soil bacterial community composition and abundance can be affected by wheat plants with different Al tolerance.

Methods

Two wheat varieties, Atlas 66 (Al-tolerant) and Scout 66 (Al-sensitive), were grown for 60 days in acidic soils amended with or without CaCO₃. Plant growth, soil pH, exchangeable Al content, bacterial community composition and abundance were investigated.

Results

Atlas 66 showed better growth and lower rhizosphere soil pH than Scout 66 irrespective of CaCO₃ amendment or not, while there was no significant difference in the exchangeable Al content of rhizosphere soil between the two wheat lines. The dominant bacterial community composition and abundance in rhizosphere soils did not differ between Atlas 66 and Scout 66, although the bacterial abundance in rhizosphere soil of both wheat lines was significantly higher than that in bulk soil. Sphingobacteriales, Clostridiales, Burkholderiales and Acidobacteriales were the dominant bacteria phylotypes.

Conclusions

The difference in wheat Al tolerance does not induce the changes in the dominant bacterial community composition or abundance in the rhizosphere soils.     

Quantitative trait loci for aluminum resistance in wheat

Quantitative trait loci (QTL) for wheat resistance to aluminum (Al) toxicity were analyzed using simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in a population of 192 F₆ recombinant inbred lines (RILs) derived from a cross between an Al-resistant cultivar, Atlas 66 and an Al-sensitive cultivar, Chisholm. Wheat reaction to Al was measured by relative root growth and root response to hematoxylin stain in nutrient-solution culture. After screening 1,028 SSR markers for polymorphisms between the parents and bulks, we identified two QTLs for Al resistance in Atlas 66. One major QTL was mapped on chromosome 4D that co-segregated with the Al-activated malate transporter gene (ALMT1). Another minor QTL was located on chromosome 3BL. Together, these two QTLs accounted for about 57% of the phenotypic variation in hematoxylin staining score and 50% of the variation in net root growth (NRG). Expression of the minor QTL on 3BL was suppressed by the major QTL on 4DL. The two QTLs for Al resistance in Atlas 66 were also verified in an additional RIL population derived from Atlas 66/Century. Several SSR markers closely linked to the QTLs were identified and have potential to be used for marker-assisted selection (MAS) to improve Al-resistance of wheat cultivars in breeding programs.     

Aluminum-induced deposition of (1,3)-β-glucans (callose) inTriticum aestivum L.

Aluminum (Al)-induced damage to leaves and roots of two Al-resistant (cv. Atlas 66, experimental line PT741) and two Al-sensitive (cv. Scout 66, cv. Katepwa) lines ofTriticum aestivum L. was estimated using the deposition of (1, 3)--glucans (callose) as a marker for injury. Two-day-old seedlings were grown for forty hours in nutrient solutions with or without added Al, and callose deposition was quantified by spectrofluorometry (0–1000 µM Al) and localized by fluorescence microscopy (0 and 400 µM Al). Results suggested that Al caused little damage to leaves. No callose was observed in leaves with up to 400 µM Al treatment. In contrast, root callose concentration increased with Al treatment, especially in the Al-sensitive lines. At 400 µM Al, root callose concentration of Al-sensitive Scout 66 was nearly four-fold that of Al-resistant Atlas 66. After Al treatment, large callose deposits were observed in the root cap, epidermis and outer cortex of root tips of Scout 66, but not Atlas 66. The identity of callose was confirmed by a reduced fluorescence in Al-treated roots: firstly, after adding an inhibitor of callose synthesis (2-deoxy-D-glucose) to the nutrient solution, and secondly, after incubating root sections with the callosedegrading enzyme -D-glucoside glucohydrolase [EC 3.2.1.21]. Root callose deposition may be a good marker for Al-induced injury due to its early detection by spectrofluorometry and its close association with stress perception.Abbreviations DDG 2-deoxy-D-glucose - PAS periodic acid - Schiffs reagent - PE pachyman equivalents