Pre-steady-state kinetic studies of the fidelity of Sulfolobus solfataricus P2 DNA polymerase IV

Sulfolobus solfataricus P2 DNA polymerase IV (Dpo4) is a thermostable archaeal enzyme and a member of the error-prone and lesion-bypass Y-family. In this paper, for the first time, the fidelity of a Y-family polymerase, Dpo4, was determined using pre-steady-state kinetic analysis of the incorporation of a single nucleotide into an undamaged DNA substrate 21/41-mer at 37 degrees C. We assessed single-turnover (with Dpo4 in molar excess over DNA) saturation kinetics for all 16 possible nucleotide incorporations. The fidelity of Dpo4 was estimated to be in the range of 10(-3)-10(-4). Interestingly, the ground-state binding affinity of correct nucleotides (70-230 microM) is 10-50-fold weaker than those of replicative DNA polymerases. Such a low affinity is consistent with the lack of interactions between Dpo4 and the bound nucleotides as revealed in the crystal structure of Dpo4, DNA, and a matched nucleotide. The affinity of incorrect nucleotides for Dpo4 is approximately 2-10-fold weaker than that of correct nucleotides. Intriguingly, the mismatched dCTP has an affinity similar to that of the matched nucleotides when it is incorporated against a pyrimidine template base flanked by a 5'-template guanine. The incoming dCTP likely skips the first available template base and base pairs with the 5'-template guanine, as observed in the crystal structure of Dpo4, DNA, and a mismatched nucleotide. The mismatch incorporation rates, regardless of the 5'-template base, were approximately 2-3 orders of magnitude slower than the incorporation rates for matched nucleotides, which is the predominant contribution to the fidelity of Dpo4.     

Identification of Critical Residues for the Tight Binding of Both Correct and Incorrect Nucleotides to Human DNA Polymerase λ

DNA polymerase λ (Pol λ) is a novel X-family DNA polymerase that shares 34% sequence identity with DNA polymerase β. Pre-steady-state kinetic studies have shown that the Pol λ-DNA complex binds both correct and incorrect nucleotides 130-fold tighter, on average, than the DNA polymerase β-DNA complex, although the base substitution fidelity of both polymerases is 10^− 4 to 10^− 5. To better understand Pol λ's tight nucleotide binding affinity, we created single-substitution and double-substitution mutants of Pol λ to disrupt the interactions between active-site residues and an incoming nucleotide or a template base. Single-turnover kinetic assays showed that Pol λ binds to an incoming nucleotide via cooperative interactions with active-site residues (R386, R420, K422, Y505, F506, A510, and R514). Disrupting protein interactions with an incoming correct or incorrect nucleotide impacted binding to each of the common structural moieties in the following order: triphosphate ? base > ribose. In addition, the loss of Watson-Crick hydrogen bonding between the nucleotide and the template base led to a moderate increase in K_d. The fidelity of Pol λ was maintained predominantly by a single residue, R517, which has minor groove interactions with the DNA template.     

Fidelity of nucleotide incorporation by human mitochondrial DNA polymerase

We have examined the fidelity of polymerization catalyzed by the human mitochondrial DNA polymerase using wild-type and exonuclease-deficient (E200A mutation) forms of recombinant, reconstituted holoenzyme. Each of the four nucleotides bind and incorporate with similar kinetics; the average dissociation constant for ground state binding is 0.8 microm, and the average rate of polymerization is 37 x s(-1), defining a specificity constant kcat/Km = 4.6 x 10(7) x m(-1) x s(-1). Mismatched nucleotides show weaker ground-state nucleotide binding affinities ranging from 57 to 364 microm and slower rates of polymerization ranging from 0.013 to 1.16 x s(-1). The kinetic parameters yield fidelity estimates of 1 error out of 260,000 nucleotides for a T:T mismatch, 3563 for G:T, and 570,000 for C:T. The accessory subunit increases fidelity 14-fold by facilitating both ground-state binding and the incorporation rate of the correct A:T base pair compared with a T:T mismatch. Correctly base-paired DNA dissociates from the polymerase at a rate of 0.02 x s(-1) promoting processive polymerization. Thus, the mitochondrial DNA polymerase catalyzed incorporation with an average processivity of 1850, defined by the ratio of polymerization rate to the dissociation rate (37/0.02) and with an average fidelity of one error in 280,000 base pairs.     

The fidelity of DNA synthesis catalyzed by derivatives of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I

The fidelity of DNA synthesis by an exonuclease-proficient DNA polymerase results from the selectivity of the polymerization reaction and from exonucleolytic proofreading. We have examined the contribution of these two steps to the fidelity of DNA synthesis catalyzed by the large Klenow fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I, using enzymes engineered by site-directed mutagenesis to inactivate the proofreading exonuclease. Measurements with two mutant Klenow polymerases lacking exonuclease activity but retaining normal polymerase activity and protein structure demonstrate that the base substitution fidelity of polymerization averages one error for each 10,000 to 40,000 bases polymerized, and can vary more than 30-fold depending on the mispair and its position. Steady-state enzyme kinetic measurements of selectivity at the initial insertion step by the exonuclease-deficient polymerase demonstrate differences in both the Km and the Vmax for incorrect versus correct nucleotides. Exonucleolytic proofreading by the wild-type enzyme improves the average base substitution fidelity by 4- to 7-fold, reflecting efficient proofreading of some mispairs and less efficient proofreading of others. The wild-type polymerase is highly accurate for -1 base frameshift errors, with an error rate of less than or equal to 10(-6). The exonuclease-deficient polymerase is less accurate, suggesting that proofreading also enhances frameshift fidelity. Even without a proofreading exonuclease, Klenow polymerase has high frameshift fidelity relative to several other DNA polymerases, including eucaryotic DNA polymerase-alpha, an exonuclease-deficient, 4-subunit complex whose catalytic subunit is almost three times larger. The Klenow polymerase has a large (46 kDa) domain containing the polymerase active site and a smaller (22 kDa) domain containing the active site for the 3'----5' exonuclease. Upon removal of the small domain, the large polymerase domain has altered base substitution error specificity when compared to the two-domain but exonuclease-deficient enzyme. It is also less accurate for -1 base errors at reiterated template nucleotides and for a 276-nucleotide deletion error. Thus, removal of a protein domain of a DNA polymerase can affect its fidelity.     

Using 2-aminopurine fluorescence to measure incorporation of incorrect nucleotides by wild type and mutant bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerases

The ability of wild type and mutant T4 DNA polymerases to discriminate in the utilization of the base analog 2-aminopurine (2AP) and the fluorescence of 2AP were used to determine how DNA polymerases distinguish between correct and incorrect nucleotides. Because T4 DNA polymerase incorporates dTMP opposite 2AP under single-turnover conditions, it was possible to compare directly the kinetic parameters for incorporation of dTMP opposite template 2AP to the parameters for incorporation of dTMP opposite template A without the complication of enzyme dissociation. The most significant difference detected was in the K(d) for dTTP, which was 10-fold higher for incorporation of dTMP opposite template 2AP (approximately 367 microm) than for incorporation of dTMP opposite template A (approximately 31 microm). In contrast, the dTMP incorporation rate was reduced only about 2-fold from about 318 s(-1) with template A to about 165 s(-1) for template 2AP. Discrimination is due to the high selectivity in the initial nucleotide-binding step. T4 DNA polymerase binding to DNA with 2AP in the template position induces formation of a nucleotide binding pocket that is preshaped to bind dTTP and to exclude other nucleotides. If nucleotide binding is hindered, initiation of the proofreading pathway acts as an error avoidance mechanism to prevent incorporation of incorrect nucleotides.     

Human DNA polymerase iota utilizes different nucleotide incorporation mechanisms dependent upon the template base

Human DNA polymerase ι (Polι) is a member of the Y family of DNA polymerases involved in translesion DNA synthesis. Polι is highly unusual in that it possesses a high fidelity on template A, but has an unprecedented low fidelity on template T, preferring to misincorporate a G instead of an A. To understand the mechanisms of nucleotide incorporation opposite different template bases by Polι, we have carried out pre-steady-state kinetic analyses of nucleotide incorporation opposite templates A and T. These analyses have revealed that opposite template A, the correct nucleotide is preferred because it is bound tighter and is incorporated faster than the incorrect nucleotides. Opposite template T, however, the correct and incorrect nucleotides are incorporated at very similar rates, and interestingly, the greater efficiency of G misincorporation relative to A incorporation opposite T arises predominantly from the tighter binding of G. Based on these results, we propose that the incipient base pair is accommodated differently in the active site of Polι dependent upon the template base and that when T is the templating base, Polι accommodates the wobble base pair better than the Watson-Crick base pair.     

Fidelity of the human mitochondrial DNA polymerase

We have quantified the fidelity of polymerization of DNA by human mitochondrial DNA polymerase using synthetic DNA oligonucleotides and recombinant holoenzyme and examining each of the possible 16-base pair combinations. Although the kinetics of incorporation for all correct nucleotides are similar, with an average Kd of 0.8 microM and an average k(pol) of 37 s(-1), the kinetics of misincorporation vary widely. The ground state binding Kd of incorrect bases ranges from a low of 25 microM for a dATP:A mispair to a high of 360 microM for a dCTP:T mispair. Similarly, the rates of incorporation of incorrect bases vary from 0.0031 s(-1) for a dCTP:C mispair to 1.16 s(-1) for a dGTP:T mispair. Due to the variability in the kinetic parameters for misincorporation, the estimates of fidelity range from 1 error in 3563 nucleotides for dGTP:T to 1 error in 2.3 x 10(6) nucleotides for dCTP:C. Interestingly, the discrimination against a dGTP:T mismatch is 16.5 times lower than that of a dTTP:G mismatch due to a tighter Kd for ground state binding and a faster rate of incorporation of the dGTP:T mismatch relative to the dTTP:G mismatch. We calculate an average fidelity of 1 error in 440,000 nucleotides.     

Mechanism of DNA polymerization catalyzed by Sulfolobus solfataricus P2 DNA polymerase IV

The kinetic mechanism of DNA polymerization catalyzed by Sulfolobus solfataricus P2 DNA polymerase IV (Dpo4) is resolved by pre-steady-state kinetic analysis of single-nucleotide (dTTP) incorporation into a DNA 21/41-mer. Like replicative DNA polymerases, Dpo4 utilizes an "induced-fit" mechanism to select correct incoming nucleotides. The affinity of DNA and a matched incoming nucleotide for Dpo4 was measured to be 10.6 nM and 230 microM, respectively. Dpo4 binds DNA with an affinity similar to that of replicative polymerases due to the presence of an atypical little finger domain and a highly charged tether that links this novel domain to its small thumb domain. On the basis of the elemental effect between the incorporations of dTTP and its thio analogue S(p)-dTTPalphaS, the incorporation of a correct incoming nucleotide by Dpo4 was shown to be limited by the protein conformational change step preceding the chemistry step. In contrast, the chemistry step limited the incorporation of an incorrect nucleotide. The measured dissociation rates of the enzyme.DNA binary complex (0.02-0.07 s(-1)), the enzyme.DNA.dNTP ternary complex (0.41 s(-1)), and the ternary complex after the protein conformational change (0.004 s(-1)) are significantly different and support the existence of a bona fide protein conformational change step. The rate-limiting protein conformational change was further substantiated by the observation of different reaction amplitudes between pulse-quench and pulse-chase experiments. Additionally, the processivity of Dpo4 was calculated to be 16 at 37 degrees C from analysis of a processive polymerization experiment. The structural basis for both the protein conformational change and the low processivity of Dpo4 was discussed.     

Kinetic analysis of base substitution mutagenesis by transient misalignment of DNA and by miscoding

We measured the insertion fidelity of DNA polymerases alpha and beta and yeast DNA polymerase I at a template site that was previously observed to yield a high frequency of T----G transversions when copied by DNA polymerase beta but not by the other two polymerases. The results provide direct biochemical evidence that base substitution errors by DNA polymerase beta can result from a dislocation mechanism governed by DNA template-primer misalignment. In contrast to DNA polymerase beta, neither Drosophila DNA polymerase alpha nor yeast DNA polymerase I appear to misinsert nucleotides by a dislocation mechanism in either the genetic or kinetic fidelity assays. Dislocation errors by DNA polymerase beta are characterized primarily by a substantial reduction in the apparent Km for inserting a "correct," but ultimately errant, nucleotide compared to the apparent Km governing direct misinsertion. For synthesis by DNA polymerase beta, dislocation results in a 35-fold increase in dCMP incorporation opposite template T (T----G transversion) and a 20-35-fold increase in dTMP incorporation opposite T (T----A transversion); these results are consistent with parallel genetic fidelity measurements. DNA polymerase beta also produces base substitution errors by direct misinsertion. Here nucleotide insertion fidelity results from substantial differences in both Km and Vmax for correct versus incorrect substrates and is influenced strongly by local base sequence.     

Dynamics of nucleotide incorporation: snapshots revealed by 2-aminopurine fluorescence studies

Formation of a noncanonical base pair between dFTP, a dTTP analogue that cannot form H bonds, and the fluorescent base analogue 2-aminopurine (2AP) was studied in order to discover how the bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase selects nucleotides with high accuracy. Changes in 2AP fluorescence intensity provided a spectroscopic reporter of the nucleotide binding reactions, which were combined with rapid-quench, pre-steady-state reactions to measure product formation. These studies supported and extended previous findings that the T4 DNA polymerase binds nucleotides in multiple steps with increasing selectivity. With 2AP in the template position, initial dTTP binding was rapid but selective: K(d(dTTP)) (first step) = 31 microM; K(d(dCTP)) (first step) approximately 3 mM. In studies with dFTP, this step was revealed to have two components: formation of an initial preinsertion complex in which H bonds between bases in the newly forming base pair were not essential, which was followed by formation of a final preinsertion complex in which H bonds assisted. The second nucleotide binding step was characterized by increased discrimination against dTTP binding opposite template 2AP, K(d) (second step) = 367 microM, and additional conformational changes were detected in ternary enzyme-DNA-dTTP complexes, as expected for forming closed complexes. We demonstrate here that the second binding step occurs before formation of the phosphodiester bond. Thus, the high fidelity of nucleotide insertion by T4 DNA polymerase is accomplished by the sequential application of selectivity in first forming accurate preinsertion complexes, and then additional conformational changes are applied that further increase discrimination against incorrect nucleotides.     

Exonuclease proofreading by human mitochondrial DNA polymerase

We have examined the ability of the human mitochondrial DNA polymerase to correct errors in DNA sequence using single turnover kinetic methods. The rate of excision of single-stranded DNA ranged from 0.07 to 0.17 x s(-1), depending on the identity of the 3'-base. Excision of the 3'-terminal base from correctly base paired DNA occurred at a rate of 0.05 x s(-1), indicating that the cost of proofreading is minimal, as defined by the ratio of the k(exo) for correctly base-paired DNA divided by the rate of forward polymerization (0.05/37 = 0.14%). Excision of duplex DNA containing 1-7 mismatches was biphasic, and the rate and amplitude of the fast phase increased with the number of mismatches, reaching a maximum of 9 x s(-1). We showed that transfer of DNA from the polymerase to the exonuclease active site and back again occurs through an intramolecular reaction, allowing for a complete cycle of reactions for error correction. For DNA containing a buried mismatch (T:T followed by C:G base pairs), the 3' base was removed at a rate of 3 x s(-1). The addition of nucleotide to the reaction that is identical to the 3' base increased the rate of excision 7-fold to 21 x s(-1). We propose that the free nucleotide enhances the rate of transfer of the DNA to the exonuclease active site by interrupting the correct 3' base pair through interaction with the template base. The exonuclease contribution to fidelity is minimal if the calculation is based on hydrolysis of a single mismatch: (k(exo) + k(pol,over))/(k(pol,over)) = 10, but this value increases to approximately 200 when examining error correction in the presence of nucleotides.     

O-helix mutant T664P of Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase I: altered catalytic properties for incorporation of incorrect nucleotides but not correct nucleotides

Previous studies indicate that the O-helix of Thermus aquaticus (Taq) DNA polymerase I (pol I) plays an important role in the replication fidelity of the enzyme. This study examines the role of Thr-664, which lies in the middle of the O-helix of Taq pol I. A mutant of Taq Pol I with a proline substitution of Thr-664 (T664P) exhibits much lower replication fidelity than the wild type enzyme in a forward mutation assay. T664P produces base substitution, single-base deletion, and single-base insertion errors at 20-, 5, and 50-fold higher rates than wild type, respectively. In specific activity and steady-state kinetic experiments, T664P was catalytically robust for insertion of correct nucleotides. In contrast, it incorporated incorrect nucleotides 6.1- to 10-fold more efficiently than wild type at a template dC. Mismatched primer termini were extended by T664P 4.2- to 9.5-fold more efficiently than wild type. These data imply that the O-helix with a proline at position 664 functions like wild type Taq pol I for correct nucleotide incorporations, but bends and enlarges the catalytic pocket of the enzyme and increases the rate of nucleotide misincorporation.     

The fidelity of base selection by the polymerase subunit of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme.

In common with other DNA polymerases, DNA polymerase III holoenzyme of E. coli selects the biologically correct base pair with remarkable accuracy. DNA polymerase III is particularly useful for mechanistic studies because the polymerase and editing activities reside on separate subunits. To investigate the biochemical mechanism for base insertion fidelity, we have used a gel electrophoresis assay to measure kinetic parameters for the incorporation of correct and incorrect nucleotides by the polymerase (alpha) subunit of DNA polymerase III. As judged by this assay, base selection contributes a factor of roughly 10(4)-10(5) to the overall fidelity of genome duplication. The accuracy of base selection is determined mainly by the differential KM of the enzyme for correct vs. incorrect deoxynucleoside triphosphate. The misinsertion of G opposite template A is relatively efficient, comparable to that found for G opposite T. Based on a variety of other work, the G:A pair may require a special correction mechanism, possibly because of a syn-anti pairing approximating Watson-Crick geometry. We suggest that precise recognition of the equivalent geometry of the Watson-Crick base pairs may be the most critical feature for base selection.     

Loop II of DNA polymerase beta is important for discrimination during substrate binding

Loop II of DNA polymerase beta (pol β) consists of 14 amino acid residues and is highly flexible and solvent exposed. Previous research from our laboratory has shown that this loop is important for polymerase activity and fidelity. In the study presented here, we demonstrate that a shortened five amino acid residue loop compromises the fidelity of pol β. This five-residue loop, termed ENEYP, induces one base frameshift errors and A–C transversions within a specific sequence context. We demonstrate that ENEYP misincorporates dGTP opposite template A at higher efficiencies than wild-type pol β. The kinetic basis for misincorporation is a defect in discrimination of the correct from incorrect dNTP substrate at the level of ground-state binding. Our results are consistent with the idea that loop II of pol β functions to maintain accurate DNA synthesis by a direct or indirect influence on the nucleotide binding pocket.     

DNA polymerase insertion fidelity. Gel assay for site-specific kinetics

A quantitative assay based on gel electrophoresis is described to measure nucleotide insertion kinetics at an arbitrary DNA template site. The assay is used to investigate kinetic mechanisms governing the fidelity of DNA synthesis using highly purified Drosophila DNA polymerase alpha holoenzyme complex and M13 primer-template DNA. Km and Vmax values are reported for correct insertion of A and misinsertion of G, C, and T opposite a single template T site. The misinsertion frequencies are 2 X 10(-4) for G-T and 5 X 10(-5) for both C-T and T-T relative to normal A-T base pairs. The dissociation constant of the polymerase-DNA-dNTP complex, as measured by Km, plays a dominant role in determining the rates of forming right and wrong base pairs. Compared with Km for insertion of A opposite T (3.7 +/- 0.7 microM), the Km value is 1100-fold greater for misinsertion of G opposite T (4.2 +/- 0.4 mM), and 2600-fold greater for misinsertion of either C or T opposite T (9.8 +/- 4.2 mM). These Km differences indicate that in the enzyme binding site the stability of A-T base pairs is 4.3 kcal/mol greater than G-T pairs and 4.9 kcal/mol greater than C-T or T-T pairs. In contrast to the large differences in Km, differences in Vmax are relatively small. There is only a 4-fold reduction in Vmax for insertion of G opposite T and an 8-fold reduction for C or T opposite T, compared with the correct insertion of A. For the specific template T site investigated, the nucleotide insertion fidelity for Drosophila polymerase alpha seems to be governed primarily by a Km discrimination mechanism.     

Kinetic characterization of the polymerase and exonuclease activities of the gene 43 protein of bacteriophage T4.

The DNA polymerase from the bacteriophage T4 is part of a multienzyme complex required for the synthesis of DNA. As a first step in understanding the contributions of individual proteins to the dynamic properties of the complex, e.g., turnover, processivity, and fidelity of replication, the minimal kinetic schemes for the polymerase and exonuclease activities of the gene 43 protein have been determined by pre-steady-state kinetic methods and fit by computer simulation. A DNA primer/template (13/20-mer) was used as substrate; duplexes that contained more single-strand DNA resulted in nonproductive binding of the polymerase. The reaction sequence features an ordered addition of 13/20-mer followed by dATP to the T4 enzyme (dissociation constants of 70 nM and 20 microM) followed by rapid conversion (400 s-1) of the T4.13/20-mer.dATP complex to the T4.14/20-mer.PPi product species. A slow step (2 s-1) following PPi release limits a single turnover, although this step is bypassed in multiple incorporations (13/20-mer-->17/20-mer) which occur at rates > 400 s-1. Competition between correct versus incorrect nucleotides relative to the template strand indicates that the dissociation constants for the incorrect nucleotides are at millimolar values, thus providing evidence that the T4 polymerase, like the T7 but unlike the Klenow fragment polymerases, discriminates by factors > 10(3) against misincorporation in the nucleotide binding step. The exonuclease activity of the T4 enzyme requires an activation step, i.e., T4.DNA-->T4.(DNA)*, whose rate constants reflect whether the 3'-terminus of the primer is matched or mismatched; for matched 13/20-mer the constant is 1 s-1, and for mismatched 13T/20-mer, 5 s-1. Evidence is presented from crossover experiments that this step may represent a melting of the terminus of the duplex, which is followed by rapid exonucleolytic cleavage (100s-1). In the presence of the correct dNTP, primer extension is the rate-limiting step rather than a step involving travel of the duplex between separated exonuclease and polymerase sites. Since the rate constant for 13/20-mer or 13T/20-mer dissociation from the enzyme is 6 or 8 s-1 and competes with that for activation, the exonucleolytic editing by the enzyme alone in a single pass is somewhat inefficient (5 s-1/(8 s-1+5 s-1)), ca. 40%. Consequently, a major role for the accessory proteins may be to slow the rate of enzyme.substrate dissociation, thereby increasing overall fidelity and processivity.     

Kinetic mechanism whereby DNA polymerase I (Klenow) replicates DNA with high fidelity

A complete kinetic scheme describing the polymerization of correct and incorrect dNTPs by the Klenow fragment (KF) of DNA polymerase I has been developed by using short DNA oligomers of defined sequence. The high fidelity arises from a three-stage mechanism. The first stage of discrimination [(1.1 X 10(4-) greater than 1.2 X 10(6]-fold] comes primarily from a dramatically reduced rate of phosphodiester bond formation for incorrect nucleotides, but it also gains a smaller contribution from selective dNTP binding. After phosphodiester bond formation, a conformational change slows dissociation of the incorrect DNA products from KF and, in conjunction with editing by the 3'----5'-exonuclease, increases fidelity 4- greater than 61-fold. Finally, KF polymerizes the next correct dNTP onto a mismatch very slowly, providing a further 6- greater than 340-fold increase in fidelity. Surprisingly, the 3'----5'-exonuclease did not in its hydrolysis reaction differentiate between correctly and incorrectly base-paired nucleotides; rather, an increased lifetime of the enzyme-DNA complex containing the misincorporated base is responsible for discrimination.     

DNA polymerase X of African swine fever virus: insertion fidelity on gapped DNA substrates and AP lyase activity support a role in base excision repair of viral DNA

DNA polymerase X (pol X) from African swine fever virus (ASFV) is the smallest naturally ocurring DNA-directed DNA polymerase (174 amino acid residues) described so far. Previous biochemical analysis has shown that ASFV pol X is a highly distributive, monomeric enzyme, lacking a proofreading 3'-5' exonuclease. Also, ASFV pol X binds intermediates of the single-nucleotide base excision repair (BER) process, and is able to efficiently repair single-nucleotide gapped DNA. In this work, we perform an extensive kinetic analysis of single correct and incorrect nucleotide insertions by ASFV pol X using different DNA substrates: (i) a primer/template DNA; (ii) a 1nt gapped DNA; (iii) a 5'-phosphorylated 1nt gapped DNA. The results obtained indicate that ASFV pol X exhibits a general preference for insertion of purine deoxynucleotides, especially dGTP opposite template C. Moreover, ASFV pol X shows higher catalytic efficiencies when filling in gapped substrates, which are increased when a phosphate group is present at the 5'-margin of the gap. Interestingly, ASFV pol X misinserts nucleotides with frequencies from 10(-4) to 10(-5), and the insertion fidelity varies depending on the substrate, being more faithful on a phosphorylated 1nt gapped substrate. We have analyzed the capacity of ASFV pol X to act on intermediates of BER repair. Although no lyase activity could be detected on preincised 5'-deoxyribose phosphate termini, ASFV pol X has lyase activity on unincised abasic sites. Altogether, the results support a role for ASFV pol X in reparative BER of damaged viral DNA during ASFV infection.