Structural basis of function in heterotrimeric G proteins

Heterotrimeric guanine-nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) act as molecular switches in signaling pathways by coupling the activation of heptahelical receptors at the cell surface to intracellular responses. In the resting state, the G-protein alpha subunit (Galpha) binds GDP and Gbetagamma. Receptors activate G proteins by catalyzing GTP for GDP exchange on Galpha, leading to a structural change in the Galpha(GTP) and Gbetagamma subunits that allows the activation of a variety of downstream effector proteins. The G protein returns to the resting conformation following GTP hydrolysis and subunit re-association. As the G-protein cycle progresses, the Galpha subunit traverses through a series of conformational changes. Crystallographic studies of G proteins in many of these conformations have provided substantial insight into the structures of these proteins, the GTP-induced structural changes in Galpha, how these changes may lead to subunit dissociation and allow Galpha and Gbetagamma to activate effector proteins, as well as the mechanism of GTP hydrolysis. However, relatively little is known about the receptor-G protein complex and how this interaction leads to GDP release from Galpha. This article reviews the structural determinants of the function of heterotrimeric G proteins in mammalian systems at each point in the G-protein cycle with special emphasis on the mechanism of receptor-mediated G-protein activation. The receptor-G protein complex has proven to be a difficult target for crystallography, and several biophysical and computational approaches are discussed that complement the currently available structural information to improve models of this interaction. Additionally, these approaches enable the study of G-protein dynamics in solution, which is becoming an increasingly appreciated component of all aspects of G-protein signaling.     

Nucleotide recognition by the initiation factor aIF5B: Free energy simulations of a neoclassical GTPase

The GTPase aIF5B is a universally conserved initiation factor that assists ribosome assembly. Crystal structures of its nucleotide complexes, X‐ray(GTP) and X‐ray(GDP), are similar in the nucleotide vicinity, but differ in the orientation of a distant domain IV. This has led to two, contradictory, mechanistic models. One postulates that X‐ray(GTP) and X‐ray(GDP) are, respectively, the active, “ON” and the inactive, “OFF” states; the other postulates that both structures are OFF, whereas the ON state is still uncharacterized. We study GTP/GDP binding using molecular dynamics and a continuum electrostatic free energy method. We predict that X‐ray(GTP) has a ≈ 3 kcal/mol preference to bind GDP, apparently contradicting its assignment as ON. However, the preference arises mainly from a single, nearby residue from the switch 2 motif: Glu81, which becomes protonated upon GTP binding, with a free energy cost of about 4 kcal/mol. We then propose a different model, where Glu81 protonation/deprotonation defines the ON/OFF states. With this model, the X‐ray(GTP):GTP complex, with its protonated Glu81, is ON, whereas X‐ray(GTP):GDP is OFF. The model postulates that distant conformational changes such as domain IV rotation are “uncoupled” from GTP/GDP exchange and do not affect the relative GTP/GDP binding affinities. We analyze the model using a general thermodynamic framework for GTPases. It yields rather precise predictions for the nucleotide specificities of each state, and the state specificities of each nucleotide, which are roughly comparable to the homologues IF2 and aIF2, despite the lack of any conformational switching in the model. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

A bifunctional Galphai/Galphas modulatory peptide that attenuates adenylyl cyclase activity

Signaling via G-protein coupled receptors is initiated by receptor-catalyzed nucleotide exchange on Galpha subunits normally bound to GDP and Gbetagamma. Activated Galpha . GTP then regulates effectors such as adenylyl cyclase. Except for Gbetagamma, no known regulators bind the adenylyl cyclase-stimulatory subunit Galphas in its GDP-bound state. We recently described a peptide, KB-752, that binds and enhances the nucleotide exchange rate of the adenylyl cyclase-inhibitory subunit Galpha(i). Herein, we report that KB-752 binds Galpha(s) . GDP yet slows its rate of nucleotide exchange. KB-752 inhibits GTPgammaS-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity in cell membranes, reflecting its opposing effects on nucleotide exchange by Galpha(i) and Galpha(s).     

Conformational changes in the amino-terminal helix of the G protein alpha(i1) following dissociation from Gbetagamma subunit and activation

G protein alpha subunits mediate activation of signaling pathways through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) by virtue of GTP-dependent conformational rearrangements. It is known that regions of disorder in crystal structures can be indicative of conformational flexibility within a molecule, and there are several such regions in G protein alpha subunits. The amino-terminal 29 residues of Galpha are alpha-helical only in the heterotrimer, where they contact the side of Gbeta, but little is known about the conformation of this region in the active GTP bound state. To address the role of the Galpha amino-terminus in G-protein activation and to investigate whether this region undergoes activation-dependent conformational changes, a site-directed cysteine mutagenesis study was carried out. Engineered Galpha(i1) proteins were created by first removing six native reactive cysteines to yield a mutant Galpha(i1)-C3S-C66A-C214S-C305S-C325A-C351I that no longer reacts with cysteine-directed labels. Several cysteine substitutions along the amino-terminal region were then introduced. All mutant proteins were shown to be folded properly and functional. An environmentally sensitive probe, Lucifer yellow, linked to these sites showed a fluorescence change upon interaction with Gbetagamma and with activation by AlF(4)(-). Other fluorescent probes of varying charge, size, and hydrophobicity linked to amino-terminal residues also revealed changes upon activation with bulkier probes reporting larger changes. Site-directed spin-labeling studies showed that the N-terminus of the Galpha subunit is dynamically disordered in the GDP bound state, but adopts a structure consistent with an alpha-helix upon interaction with Gbetagamma. Interaction of the resulting spin-labeled Galphabetagamma with photoactivated rhodopsin, followed by rhodopsin-catalyzed GTPgammaS binding, caused the amino-terminal domain of Galpha to revert to a dynamically disordered state similar to that of the GDP-bound form. Together these results suggest conformational changes occur in the amino-termini of Galpha(i) proteins upon subunit dissociation and upon activating conformational changes. These solution studies reveal insights into conformational changes that occur dynamically in solution.     

Inhibition of GDP/GTP exchange on G alpha subunits by proteins containing G-protein regulatory motifs

A novel Galpha binding consensus sequence, termed G-protein regulatory (GPR) or GoLoco motif, has been identified in a growing number of proteins, which are thought to modulate G-protein signaling. Alternative roles of GPR proteins as nucleotide exchange factors or as GDP dissociation inhibitors for Galpha have been proposed. We investigated the modulation of the GDP/GTP exchange of Gialpha(1), Goalpha, and Gsalpha by three proteins containing GPR motifs (GPR proteins), LGN-585-642, Pcp2, and RapIGAPII-23-131, to elucidate the mechanisms of GPR protein function. The GPR proteins displayed similar patterns of interaction with Gialpha(1) with the following order of affinities: Gialpha(1)GDP > Gialpha(1)GDPAlF(4)(-) > or = Gialpha(1)GTPgammaS. No detectable binding of the GPR proteins to Gsalpha was observed. LGN-585-642, Pcp2, and RapIGAPII-23-131 inhibited the rates of spontaneous GTPgammaS binding and blocked GDP release from Gialpha(1) and Goalpha. The inhibitory effects of the GPR proteins on Gialpha(1) were significantly more potent, indicating that Gi might be a preferred target for these modulators. Our results suggest that GPR proteins are potent GDP dissociation inhibitors for Gialpha-like Galpha subunits in vitro, and in this capacity they may inhibit GPCR/Gi protein signaling in vivo.     

Gbetagamma inhibits Galpha GTPase-activating proteins by inhibition of Galpha-GTP binding during stimulation by receptor

Gbetagamma subunits modulate several distinct molecular events involved with G protein signaling. In addition to regulating several effector proteins, Gbetagamma subunits help anchor Galpha subunits to the plasma membrane, promote interaction of Galpha with receptors, stabilize the binding of GDP to Galpha to suppress spurious activation, and provide membrane contact points for G protein-coupled receptor kinases. Gbetagamma subunits have also been shown to inhibit the activities of GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), both phospholipase C (PLC)-betas and RGS proteins, when assayed in solution under single turnover conditions. We show here that Gbetagamma subunits inhibit G protein GAP activity during receptor-stimulated, steady-state GTPase turnover. GDP/GTP exchange catalyzed by receptor requires Gbetagamma in amounts approximately equimolar to Galpha, but GAP inhibition was observed with superstoichiometric Gbetagamma. The potency of inhibition varied with the GAP and the Galpha subunit, but half-maximal inhibition of the GAP activity of PLC-beta1 was observed with 5-10 nM Gbetagamma, which is at or below the concentrations of Gbetagamma needed for regulation of physiologically relevant effector proteins. The kinetics of GAP inhibition of both receptor-stimulated GTPase activity and single turnover, solution-based GAP assays suggested a competitive mechanism in which Gbetagamma competes with GAPs for binding to the activated, GTP-bound Galpha subunit. An N-terminal truncation mutant of PLC-beta1 that cannot be directly regulated by Gbetagamma remained sensitive to inhibition of its GAP activity, suggesting that the Gbetagamma binding site relevant for GAP inhibition is on the Galpha subunit rather than on the GAP. Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer between cyan or yellow fluorescent protein-labeled G protein subunits and Alexa532-labeled RGS4, we found that Gbetagamma directly competes with RGS4 for high-affinity binding to Galpha(i)-GDP-AlF4.     

Structural basis for the unique biological function of small GTPase RHEB

The small GTPase Rheb displays unique biological and biochemical properties different from other small GTPases and functions as an important mediator between the tumor suppressor proteins TSC1 and TSC2 and the mammalian target of rapamycin to stimulate cell growth. We report here the three-dimensional structures of human Rheb in complexes with GDP, GTP, and GppNHp (5'-(beta,gamma-imide)triphosphate), which reveal novel structural features of Rheb and provide a molecular basis for its distinct properties. During GTP/GDP cycling, switch I of Rheb undergoes conformational change while switch II maintains a stable, unusually extended conformation, which is substantially different from the alpha-helical conformation seen in other small GTPases. The unique switch II conformation results in a displacement of Gln64 (equivalent to the catalytic Gln61 of Ras), making it incapable of participating in GTP hydrolysis and thus accounting for the low intrinsic GTPase activity of Rheb. This rearrangement also creates space to accommodate the side chain of Arg15, avoiding its steric hindrance with the catalytic residue and explaining its noninvolvement in GTP hydrolysis. Unlike Ras, the phosphate moiety of GTP in Rheb is shielded by the conserved Tyr35 of switch I, leading to the closure of the GTP-binding site, which appears to prohibit the insertion of a potential arginine finger from its GTPase-activating protein. Taking the genetic, biochemical, biological, and structural data together, we propose that Rheb forms a new group of the Ras/Rap subfamily and uses a novel GTP hydrolysis mechanism that utilizes Asn1643 of the tuberous sclerosis complex 2 GTPase-activating protein domain instead of Gln64 of Rheb as the catalytic residue.     

Structure of Galpha(i1) bound to a GDP-selective peptide provides insight into guanine nucleotide exchange

Heterotrimeric G proteins are molecular switches that regulate numerous signaling pathways involved in cellular physiology. This characteristic is achieved by the adoption of two principal states: an inactive, GDP bound state and an active, GTP bound state. Under basal conditions, G proteins exist in the inactive, GDP bound state; thus, nucleotide exchange is crucial to the onset of signaling. Despite our understanding of G protein signaling pathways, the mechanism of nucleotide exchange remains elusive. We employed phage display technology to identify nucleotide state-dependent Galpha binding peptides. Herein, we report a GDP-selective Galpha binding peptide, KB-752, that enhances spontaneous nucleotide exchange of Galpha(i) subunits. Structural determination of the Galpha(i1)/peptide complex reveals unique changes in the Galpha switch regions predicted to enhance nucleotide exchange by creating a GDP dissociation route. Our results cast light onto a potential mechanism by which Galpha subunits adopt a conformation suitable for nucleotide exchange.     

GEF-mediated GDP/GTP exchange by monomeric GTPases: A regulatory role for Mg2+?

GTPases share highly conserved guanine nucleotide-binding domains and fulfill diverse functions through a common molecular switch. An inactive GDP-bound protein is turned on by a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) that catalyzes exchange of GTP for GDP, but unfortunately little is known about the mechanism of GEF action. A common mechanism for GDP/GTP exchange can be envisioned wherein GEFs activate monomeric GTPases through transient disruption of Mg²⁺ coordination in the nucleotide-binding pocket while stabilizing a nucleotide-free (and cation-free) conformation. After guanine nucleotide exchange, Mg²⁺ coordination is restored to complete the conformational switch to the active GTP-bound state. Evidence in the literature highlighting an important regulatory role for Mg²⁺ in the mechanism of GEF-mediated GDP/GTP exchange by monomeric GTPases is summarized. BioEssays 20 :516–521, 1998. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Molecular basis of guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor activity of human neuroglobin by chemical cross-linking and mass spectrometry

Oxidized human neuroglobin (Ngb), a heme protein expressed in the brain, has been proposed to act as a guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor (GDI) for the GDP-bound form of the heterotrimeric G protein alpha-subunit (Galpha(i)). Here, to elucidate the molecular mechanism underlying the GDI activity of Ngb, we used an glutathione-S-transferase pull-down assay to confirm that Ngb competes with G-protein betagamma-subunits (Gbetagamma) for binding to Galpha(i), and identified the Galpha(i)-binding site in Ngb by chemical cross-linking with 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride and sulfo-N-hydroxysuccinimide, coupled with mass spectrometry (MS). Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) MS analysis for tryptic peptides derived from the cross-linked Ngb-Galpha(i) complex revealed several binding regions in Ngb. Furthermore, MALDI-TOF/TOF MS analysis of the cross-linked Ngb and Galpha(i) peptides, together with the MS/MS scoring method, predicted cross-linking between Glu60 (Ngb) and Ser206 (Galpha(i)), and between Glu53 (Ngb) and Ser44 (Galpha(i)). Because Ser206 of Galpha(i) is located in the region that contacts Gbetagamma, binding of Ngb could facilitate the release of Gbetagamma from Galpha(i). Binding of Ngb to Galpha(i) would also inhibit the exchange of GDP for GTP, because Ser44 (Galpha(i)) is adjacent to the GDP-binding site and Glu53 (Ngb), which is cross-linked to Ser44 (Galpha(i)), could be located close to GDP. Thus, we have identified, for the first time, the sites of interaction between Ngb and Galpha(i), enabling us to discuss the functional significance of this binding on the GDI activity of Ngb.     

Structural insights into Rab21 GTPase activation mechanism by molecular dynamics simulations

Rab proteins belong to the family of monomeric GTPases which are involved in the cellular membrane trafficking. Rab21 protein exists in interchangeable GTP- and GDP-bound states. Rabs switch between two active and inactive conformations like other GTPases. The inactive form of Rab is bound to GDP while its active form is bounded with the GTP. Interexchange between active and inactive form is mediated by the GDP/GTP exchange factor (GEF) which catalyses the conversion from GDP-bound to GTP-bound form, thereby activating the Rab. While the GTP hydrolysis of Rabs is regulated by a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) which causes Rab inactivation. Here, we report the structural flexibility of the Rab21-GTP and Rab21-GDP complexes by docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Structural analysis of exchange mechanisms of the co-factors complexed with Rab21 reveals that Cys29, Thr33, His48, Gln78 and Lys133 are essentially important in the activation of proteins. Furthermore, a significant change in the orientation of the interacting co-factors, with slight variation in the free energy of binding was observed. Complexation of GEF with Rab21-GTP and Rab21-GDP reveal a flipping of the switchable residues. Finally, 50 ns MD simulations confirm that the GTP-bound Rab21 complex is thermodynamically more favoured than the corresponding GDP-bound complex. This study provides a detailed understanding of the structural elements involved in the conformational changes of Rab21.     

New insights into the role of conserved, essential residues in the GTP binding/GTP hydrolytic cycle of large G proteins

The GTP hydrolytic (GTPase) reaction terminates signaling by both large (heterotrimeric) and small (Ras-related) GTP-binding proteins (G proteins). Two residues that are necessary for GTPase activity are an arginine (often called the "arginine finger") found either in the Switch I domains of the alpha subunits of large G proteins or contributed by the GTPase-activating proteins of small G proteins, and a glutamine that is highly conserved in the Switch II domains of Galpha subunits and small G proteins. However, questions still exist regarding the mechanism of the GTPase reaction and the exact role played by the Switch II glutamine. Here, we have characterized the GTP binding and GTPase activities of mutants in which the essential arginine or glutamine residue has been changed within the background of a Galpha chimera (designated alpha(T)*), comprised mainly of the alpha subunit of retinal transducin (alpha(T)) and the Switch III region from the alpha subunit of G(i1). As expected, both the alpha(T)*(R174C) and alpha(T)*(Q200L) mutants exhibited severely compromised GTPase activity. Neither mutant was capable of responding to aluminum fluoride when monitoring changes in the fluorescence of Trp-207 in Switch II, although both stimulated effector activity in the absence of rhodopsin and Gbetagamma. Surprisingly, each mutant also showed some capability for being activated by rhodopsin and Gbetagamma to undergo GDP-[(35)S]GTPgammaS exchange. The ability of the mutants to couple to rhodopsin was not consistent with the assumption that they contained only bound GTP, prompting us to examine their nucleotide-bound states following their expression and purification from Escherichia coli. Indeed, both mutants contained bound GDP as well as GTP, with 35-45% of each mutant being isolated as GDP-P(i) complexes. Overall, these findings suggest that the R174C and Q200L mutations reveal Galpha subunit states that occur subsequent to GTP hydrolysis but are still capable of fully stimulating effector activity.     

Influence of membrane components in the binding of proteins to membrane surfaces

We have quantified the enhancement of membrane binding of activated and deactivated Galpha(s) and Galpha(q) subunits, Gbetagamma subunits, and phospholipase Cbeta(2) by lipid rafts and by the presence of membrane-associated protein partners. Membrane binding studies show that lipid rafts do not affect the intrinsic membrane affinity of Galpha(q)(GDP) and Galpha(s)(GDP), supporting the idea that these proteins partition evenly between the domains. Visualization of lipid rafts on monolayers by use of a probe that does not enter raft domains shows that neither activated nor deactivated Galpha(q)(GDP) subunits distribute evenly between the raft and nonraft domains, contrary to previous suggestions. Membrane binding of deactivated Galpha(q) and Galpha(s)(GDP) became weaker when Gbetagamma subunits were present, in contrast with the behavior predicted by thermodynamics. However, activated Galpha subunits and phospholipase Cbeta(2) were recruited to membrane surfaces by protein partners by predicted amounts. Our studies suggest that the anomalous behavior seen for deactivated Galpha subunits in the presence of Gbetagamma subunits may be due to conformational changes in the N-terminus and/or occlusion of a portion of its membrane interaction region by Gbetagamma. Even though membrane recruitment was clearly observed for one protein partner, the presence of a second partner of lower affinity did not further promote membrane binding. For these proteins, the formation of larger protein complexes with very high membrane affinities is unlikely.     

High resolution crystal structures of human Rab5a and five mutants with substitutions in the catalytically important phosphate-binding loop

GTPase domain crystal structures of Rab5a wild type and five variants with mutations in the phosphate-binding loop are reported here at resolutions up to 1.5 A. Of particular interest, the A30P mutant was crystallized in complexes with GDP, GDP+AlF(3), and authentic GTP, respectively. The other variant crystals were obtained in complexes with a non-hydrolyzable GTP analog, GppNHp. All structures were solved in the same crystal form, providing an unusual opportunity to compare structures of small GTPases with different catalytic rates. The A30P mutant exhibits dramatically reduced GTPase activity and forms a GTP-bound complex stable enough for crystallographic analysis. Importantly, the A30P structure with bound GDP plus AlF(3) has been solved in the absence of a GTPase-activating protein, and it may resemble that of a transition state intermediate. Conformational changes are observed between the GTP-bound form and the transition state intermediate, mainly in the switch II region containing the catalytic Gln(79) residue and independent of A30P mutation-induced local alterations in the P-loop. The structures suggest an important catalytic role for a P-loop backbone amide group, which is eliminated in the A30P mutant, and support the notion that the transition state of GTPase-mediated GTP hydrolysis is of considerable dissociative character.     

Structure of the small G protein Rap2 in a non-catalytic complex with GTP

We report a novel crystal form of the small G protein Rap2A in complex with GTP which has no GTPase activity in the crystal. The asymmetric unit contains two complexes which show that a conserved switch I residue, Tyr 32, contributes an extra hydrogen bond to the gamma-phosphate of GTP as compared to related structures with GTP analogs. Since GTP is not hydrolyzed in the crystal, this interaction is unlikely to contribute to the intrinsic GTPase activity. The comparison of other G protein structures to the Rap2-GTP complex suggests that an equivalent interaction is likely to exist in their GTP form, whether unbound or bound to an effector. This interaction has to be released to allow the GAP-activated GTPase, and presumably the intrinsic GTPase activity as well. We also discuss the definition of the flexible regions and their hinges in the light of this structure and the expanding database of G protein structures. We propose that the switch I and switch II undergo either partial or complete disorder-to-order transitions according to their cellular status, thus defining a complex energy landscape comprising more than two conformational states. We observe in addition that the region connecting the switch I and switch II is flexible in Rap2 and other G proteins. This region may be important for protein-protein interactions and possibly behave as a conformational lever arm, as characterized for Arf. Taken together, these observations suggest that the structural mechanisms of small G proteins are significantly driven by entropy-based free energy changes.     

Structural determinants underlying the temperature-sensitive nature of a Galpha mutant in asymmetric cell division of Caenorhabditis elegans

Heterotrimeric G-proteins are integral to a conserved regulatory module that influences metazoan asymmetric cell division (ACD). In the Caenorhabditis elegans zygote, GOA-1 (Galpha(o)) and GPA-16 (Galpha(i)) are involved in generating forces that pull on astral microtubules and position the spindle asymmetrically. GPA-16 function has been analyzed in vivo owing notably to a temperature-sensitive allele gpa-16(it143), which, at the restrictive temperature, results in spindle orientation defects in early embryos. Here we identify the structural basis of gpa-16(it143), which encodes a point mutation (G202D) in the switch II region of GPA-16. Using Galpha(i1)(G202D) as a model in biochemical analyses, we demonstrate that high temperature induces instability of the mutant Galpha. At the permissive temperature, the mutant Galpha was stable upon GTP binding, but switch II rearrangement was compromised, as were activation state-selective interactions with regulators involved in ACD, including GoLoco motifs, RGS proteins, and RIC-8. We solved the crystal structure of the mutant Galpha bound to GDP, which indicates a unique switch II conformation as well as steric constraints that suggest activated GPA-16(it143) is destabilized relative to wild type. Spindle severing in gpa-16(it143) embryos revealed that pulling forces are symmetric and markedly diminished at the restrictive temperature. Interestingly, pulling forces are asymmetric and generally similar in magnitude to wild type at the permissive temperature despite defects in the structure of GPA-16(it143). These normal pulling forces in gpa-16(it143) embryos at the permissive temperature were attributable to GOA-1 function, underscoring a complex interplay of Galpha subunit function in ACD.     

The Charge-dipole Pocket: A Defining Feature of Signaling Pathway GTPase On/Off Switches

Ras-like GTPases function as on/off switches in intracellular signaling pathways. Their on or off state is communicated through conformational changes in the so-called switch I and II regions. It is commonly believed that the distinguishing molecular features of these GTPases are well known. Here, however, I identify—through a Bayesian iterative analysis of GTPase evolutionary divergence—a previously undescribed switch II structural component that (along with previously described, functionally critical residues) most distinguish these signaling pathway on/off switches from other GTPases. In certain Ras-like GTPases this newly-identified component forms an aromatic pocket around the negative-dipole moment at the end of a switch II helix with a positively charged residue inserted into the pocket. This helix is oriented in a specific direction away from the GTPase core, but is reoriented dramatically upon disruption of the charge-dipole pocket. The charge-dipole pocket occurs in both the on and off states and both the charge-dipole pocket and an alternative configuration occur within the unit cell of a single crystal structure of Rab5a GTPase in the off state. Thus, the charge-dipole pocket configuration is closely associated, not with the on or off state, but rather with formation of the outward-oriented helix and, as a result, with restructuring of the switch II N-terminal region, which has a critical role both in sensing the on/off state and in mediating GTP hydrolysis and nucleotide exchange.     

Structural model of a complex between the heterotrimeric G protein, Gsalpha, and tubulin

A number of studies have demonstrated interplay between the cytoskeleton and G protein signaling. Many of these studies have determined a specific interaction between tubulin, the building block of microtubules, and G proteins. The alpha subunits of some heterotrimeric G proteins, including Gsalpha, have been shown to interact strongly with tubulin. Binding of Galpha to tubulin results in increased dynamicity of microtubules due to activation of GTPase of tubulin. Tubulin also activates Gsalpha via a direct transfer of GTP between these molecules. Structural insight into the interaction between tubulin and Gsalpha was required, and was determined, in this report, through biochemical and molecular docking techniques. Solid phase peptide arrays suggested that a portion of the amino terminus, alpha2-beta4 (the region between switch II and switch III) and alpha3-beta5 (just distal to the switch III region) domains of Gsalpha are important for interaction with tubulin. Molecular docking studies revealed the best-fit models based on the biochemical data, showing an interface between the two molecules that includes the adenylyl cyclase/Gbetagamma interaction regions of Gsalpha and the exchangeable nucleotide-binding site of tubulin. These structural models explain the ability of tubulin to facilitate GTP exchange on Galpha and the ability of Galpha to activate tubulin GTPase.     

Mutagenesis in the switch IV of the helical domain of the human Gsalpha reduces its GDP/GTP exchange rate

The Galpha subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins are constituted by a conserved GTPase "Ras-like" domain (RasD) and by a unique alpha-helical domain (HD). Upon GTP binding, four regions, called switch I, II, III, and IV, have been identified as undergoing structural changes. Switch I, II, and III are located in RasD and switch IV in HD. All Galpha known functions, such as GTPase activity and receptor, effector, and Gbetagamma interaction sites have been found to be localized in RasD, but little is known about the role of HD and its switch IV region. Through the construction of chimeras between human and Xenopus Gsalpha we have previously identified a HD region, encompassing helices alphaA, alphaB, and alphaC, that was responsible for the observed functional differences in their capacity to activate adenylyl cyclase (Antonelli et al. [1994]: FEBS Lett 340:249-254). Since switch IV is located within this region and contains most of the nonconservative amino acid differences between both Gsalpha proteins, in the present work we constructed two human Gsalpha mutant proteins in which we have changed four and five switch IV residues for the ones present in the Xenopus protein. Mutants M15 (hGsalphaalphaS133N, M135P, P138K, P143S) and M17 (hGsalphaalphaS133N, M135P, V137Y, P138K, P143S) were expressed in Escherichia coli, purified, and characterized by their ability to bind GTPgammaS, dissociate GDP, hydrolyze GTP, and activate adenylyl cyclase. A decreased rate of GDP release, GTPgammaS binding, and GTP hydrolysis was observed for both mutants, M17 having considerably slower kinetics than M15 for all functions tested. Reconstituted adenylyl cyclase activity with both mutants showed normal activation in the presence of AlF(4)(-), but a decreased activation with GTPgammaS, which is consistent with the lower GDP dissociating rate they displayed. These data provide new evidence on the role that HD is playing in modulating the GDP/GTP exchange of the Gsalpha subunit.     

Crystal structure of inactive form of Rab3B

Rab proteins are the largest family of ras-related GTPases in eukaryotic cells. They act as directional molecular switches at membrane trafficking, including vesicle budding, cargo sorting, transport, tethering, and fusion. Here, we generated and crystallized the Rab3B:GDP complex. The structure of the complex was solved to 1.9 Å resolution and the structural base comparison with other Rab3 members provides a structural basis for the GDP/GTP switch in controlling the activity of small GTPase. The comparison of charge distribution among the members of Rab3 also indicates their different roles in vesicular trafficking.