Analyzing incomplete longitudinal clinical trial data

Using standard missing data taxonomy, due to Rubin and co-workers, and simple algebraic derivations, it is argued that some simple but commonly used methods to handle incomplete longitudinal clinical trial data, such as complete case analyses and methods based on last observation carried forward, require restrictive assumptions and stand on a weaker theoretical foundation than likelihood-based methods developed under the missing at random (MAR) framework. Given the availability of flexible software for analyzing longitudinal sequences of unequal length, implementation of likelihood-based MAR analyses is not limited by computational considerations. While such analyses are valid under the comparatively weak assumption of MAR, the possibility of data missing not at random (MNAR) is difficult to rule out. It is argued, however, that MNAR analyses are, themselves, surrounded with problems and therefore, rather than ignoring MNAR analyses altogether or blindly shifting to them, their optimal place is within sensitivity analysis. The concepts developed here are illustrated using data from three clinical trials, where it is shown that the analysis method may have an impact on the conclusions of the study.     

A Model for the Censoring Process in Incomplete Repeated Measurement Experiments

Premature terminations or dropouts occur often in repeated measurement experiments. A number of methods have been proposed to analyze such data but most of them assume that the censoring mechanism is, within each group, unaffected by the mechanism generating the response variables. In this paper, we propose a model for the censoring mechanism that generates dropouts. We then show how this model can be used to check whether the censoring mechanism is affected by the response variables and other covariates. Finally, the methods of the paper are applied to the “Halothane” data set.     

Multiple Imputation Methods for Estimating Regression Coefficients in the Competing Risks Model with Missing Cause of Failure

We propose a method to estimate the regression coefficients in a competing risks model where the cause-specific hazard for the cause of interest is related to covariates through a proportional hazards relationship and when cause of failure is missing for some individuals. We use multiple imputation procedures to impute missing cause of failure, where the probability that a missing cause is the cause of interest may depend on auxiliary covariates, and combine the maximum partial likelihood estimators computed from several imputed data sets into an estimator that is consistent and asymptotically normal. A consistent estimator for the asymptotic variance is also derived. Simulation results suggest the relevance of the theory in finite samples. Results are also illustrated with data from a breast cancer study.     

Testing for bias in weighted estimating equations

It is very common in regression analysis to encounter incompletely observed covariate information. A recent approach to analyse such data is weighted estimating equations (Robins, J. M., Rotnitzky, A. and Zhao, L. P. (1994), JASA, 89, 846-866, and Zhao, L. P., Lipsitz, S. R. and Lew, D. (1996), Biometrics, 52, 1165-1182). With weighted estimating equations, the contribution to the estimating equation from a complete observation is weighted by the inverse of the probability of being observed. We propose a test statistic to assess if the weighted estimating equations produce biased estimates. Our test statistic is similar to the test statistic proposed by DuMouchel and Duncan (1983) for weighted least squares estimates for sample survey data. The method is illustrated using data from a randomized clinical trial on chemotherapy for multiple myeloma.