Intrapulse temporality between pulses of a metabolite of prostaglandin F2α and circulating concentrations of progesterone before, during, and after spontaneous luteolysis in heifers

Pulses of the prostaglandin F_2α (PGF) metabolite 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF_2α (PGFM) and the intrapulse concentrations of progesterone were characterized hourly during the preluteolytic, luteolytic, and postluteolytic periods in seven heifers. The common hour of the end of preluteolysis and the beginning of luteolysis was based on a progressive progesterone decrease when assessed only at the peaks of successive oscillations. The end of the luteolytic period was defined as a decrease in progesterone to 1 ng/mL. Blood samples were taken hourly from 15 d after ovulation until luteal regression as determined by color-Doppler ultrasonography. Between Hours −2 and 2 (Hour 0 = PGFM peak) of the last PGFM pulse of the preluteolytic period, progesterone decreased between Hours −1 and 0, and then returned to the prepulse concentration. Concentration did not change significantly thereafter until a PGFM pulse early in the luteolytic period; progesterone decreased by Hour 0 and transiently rebounded after Hour 0, but not to the prepulse concentration. In the later portion of the luteolytic period, progesterone also decreased between Hours −1 and 0 but did not rebound. After the defined end of luteolysis, progesterone decreased slightly throughout a PGFM pulse. Results demonstrated for the first time that the patterns of progesterone concentrations within a PGFM pulse differ considerably among the preluteolytic, luteolytic, and postluteolytic periods.     

Effects of inhibition of prostaglandin F2α biosynthesis during preluteolysis and luteolysis in heifers

Flunixin meglumine (FM; 2.5 mg/kg) was given to heifers at three 8-h intervals, 16 d after ovulation (first treatment = Hour 0) to inhibit the synthesis of prostaglandin F_2α (PGF), based on plasma concentrations of a PGF metabolite (PGFM). Blood samples were collected at 8-h intervals from 15 to 18 d in a vehicle (control) and FM group (n = 16/group). Hourly samples were collected from Hours −2 to 28 in 10 heifers in each group. Heifers that were in preluteolysis or luteolysis at Hour 0 based on plasma progesterone (P4) concentrations at 8-h intervals were partitioned into subgroups. Concentration of PGFM was reduced (P < 0.05) by FM treatment in each subgroup. For the preluteolytic subgroup, the first decrease (P < 0.05) in P4 concentration after Hour 0 occurred at Hours 24 and 40 in the vehicle and FM groups, respectively. Plasma P4 concentrations 32 and 40 h after the beginning of luteolysis in the luteolytic subgroup were greater (P < 0.05) in the FM group. Concentration at the peak of a PGFM pulse in the FM group was greater (P < 0.05) in the luteolytic than in the preluteolytic subgroup. The peak of a PGFM pulse occurred more frequently (P < 0.001) at the same hour as the peak of an LH fluctuation than at the ending nadir of an LH fluctuation. In conclusion, a reduction in prominence of PGFM pulses during luteolysis delayed completion of luteolysis, and treatment with FM inhibited PGFM production more during preluteolysis than during luteolysis.     

Stimulation of pulses of 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF2α (PGFM) with estradiol-17β and changes in circulating progesterone concentrations within a PGFM pulse in heifers

A single physiologic dose (0.1 mg) of estradiol-17β in sesame-oil vehicle or vehicle alone (n = 8) was given to heifers on day 14 after ovulation to study the effect on circulating 13-14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF2α (PGFM), PGFM pulses, and changes in progesterone concentrations within a PGFM pulse. Blood samples were collected hourly for 16 h after treatment. The estradiol group had a greater mean concentration of PGFM, greater number of heifers with PGFM pulses and number of pulses/heifer, and greater prominence of the PGFM pulses. Changes in progesterone concentrations were not detected during the 16 h sampling session in the vehicle group, indicating that the heifers were in preluteolysis. Progesterone decreased after 12 h in the estradiol group, indicating a luteolytic effect of the estradiol-induced PGF secretion as represented by PGFM concentrations. Intrapulse changes in progesterone were detected during a PGFM pulse in the estradiol group (P < 0.006), but not in the vehicle group. Progesterone increased (P < 0.01) between Hours −2 and −1 of an estradiol-induced PGFM pulse (Hour 0 = peak of pulse), decreased (P < 0.004) between Hours −1 and 0, and increased (P < 0.01) or rebounded between Hours 0 and 1. Results were compatible with previous reports of a role for estradiol in the induction of PGFM pulses in cattle and demonstrated intrapulse changes in progesterone concentrations during an induced PGFM pulse.     

Pulsatility and interrelationships of 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF2alpha (PGFM), luteinizing hormone, progesterone, and estradiol in heifers

Temporality among episodes of a prostaglandin F2alpha metabolite (PGFM), progesterone (P4), luteinizing hormone (LH), and estradiol (E2) were studied during preluteolysis and luteolysis. A vehicle group (n = 10) and a group with an E2-induced PGFM pulse (n = 10) were used. Blood sampling was done every 0.25 h for 8 h. An episode was identified by comparing its coefficient of variation (CV) with the intra-assay CV. Pulsatility of PGFM, P4, LH, and E2 in individual heifers was inferred if the autocorrelation functions were different (P < 0.05) from zero. About four nonrhythmic fluctuations of PGFM/8 h were superimposed on PGFM pulses. Pulsatility was detected for LH but not for P4 and E2. A transient increase in P4 was not detected during the ascending portion of a PGFM pulse. Progesterone decreased (P < 0.003) during Hours -1.25 to -0.50 of the PGFM pulse (Hour 0 = peak) and ceased to decrease temporally with an increase (P < 0.05) in LH. Maximum P4 concentration occurred 0.25 h after an LH pulse peak, and an increase (P < 0.005) in E2 began at the LH peak. Nadirs of LH pulses were greater (P < 0.05) and the nadir-to-nadir interval was shorter (P < 0.003) in the E2 group, which is consistent with reported characteristics during luteolysis. The results did not support the hypothesis of a transient P4 increase early in a PGFM pulse and indicated a balance between a luteolytic effect of PGF and a luteotropic effect of LH within the hours of a PGFM pulse.     

Inhibition of prostaglandin biosynthesis during postluteolysis and effects on CL regression, prolactin, and ovulation in heifers

The beginning of postluteolysis (progesterone, <1 ng mL⁻¹) in heifers was targeted by using 8 h after ultrasonic detection of a 25% decrease in CL area (cm²) and was designated Hour 0. Flunixin meglumine (FM; n = 10) to inhibit PGF_2α secretion or vehicle (n = 9) were given intramuscularly at Hours 0, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40. The dose of FM was 2.5 mg/kg at each treatment. Blood sampling and measurement of the CL and dominant follicle were done every 8 h beginning 14 days postovulation in each group. Blood samples for detection of pulses of PRL and pulses of a metabolite of PGF_2α (PGFM) were obtained every hour for 24 h beginning at Hour 0. Pulse concentrations of both PGFM and PRL were lower in the FM group than in the vehicle group. Concentration of PRL was greatest at the peak of a PGFM pulse. Neither CL area (cm²) nor progesterone concentration differed between groups during Hours 0 to 48 (postluteolysis). Ovulation occurred in nine of nine heifers in the vehicle group and in three of 10 heifers in the FM group. The anovulatory follicles in the FM group grew to 36.2 ± 2.9 mm, and the wall became thickened from apparent luteinization. The hypothesis that PGF_2α was involved in the continued P4 decrease and structural CL regression during postluteolysis was not supported. However, the hypotheses that pulses of PGFM and PRL were temporally related and that systemic FM treatment induced an anovulatory follicle were supported.     

Stimulatory effect of PGF2α on PRL based on experimental inhibition of each hormone in mares

During the luteolytic period in mares, the peak of 65% of pulses of a PGF2α metabolite (PGFM) and the peak of a pulse of PRL have been reported to occur at the same hour. It is unknown whether the synchrony reflects an effect of PGF2α on PRL or vice versa. Controls, a flunixin meglumine (FM)-treated group (to inhibit PGF2α), and a bromocriptine-treated group (to inhibit PRL), were used at 14 days postovulation in June and in September (n = 6 mares/group/mo). Blood samples were collected hourly from just before treatment (Hour 0) to Hour 10. Concentrations of PGFM in the FM group were lower (P < 0.05) at Hours 4 to 6 than in the controls in each month, but bromocriptine had no detected effects on PGFM. Concentrations of PGFM averaged over all groups and within each group did not differ between June and September. Compared to the controls, concentrations of PRL in June were lower (P < 0.05) in the FM group at Hours 4 to 8 and in the bromocriptine group at Hours 4 to 10. Concentration of PRL averaged over groups was lower (P < 0.0001) in September (0.9 ± 0.05 ng/mL, mean ± SEM) than in June (3.0 ± 0.3 ng/mL). Results supported the hypothesis that the positive association between PGFM and PRL concentrations in mares represents an effect of PGF2α on PRL rather than an effect of PRL on PGF2α.     

Direct effect of PGF2α pulses on PRL pulses, based on inhibition of PRL or PGF2α secretion in heifers

The relationships between PRL and PGF_2α and their effect on luteolysis were studied. Heifers were treated with a dopamine-receptor agonist (bromocriptine; Bc) and a Cox-1 and -2 inhibitor (flunixin meglumine [FM]) to inhibit PRL and PGF_2α, respectively. The Bc was given (Hour 0) when ongoing luteolysis was indicated by a 12.5% reduction in CL area (cm²) from the area on Day 14 postovulation, and FM was given at Hours 0, 4, and 8. Blood samples were collected every 8-h beginning on Day 14 until Hour 48 and hourly for Hours 0 to 12. Three groups of heifers in ongoing luteolysis were used: control (n = 7), Bc (n = 7), and FM (n = 4). Treatment with Bc decreased (P < 0.003) the PRL concentrations averaged over Hours 1 to 12. During the greatest decrease in PRL (Hours 2-6), LH concentrations were increased. Progesterone concentrations averaged over hours were greater (P < 0.05) in the Bc group than in the controls. In the FM group, no PGFM pulses were detected, and PRL concentrations were reduced. Concentrations of PGFM were not reduced in the Bc group, despite the reduction in PRL. Results supported the hypothesis that a decrease (12.5%) in CL area (cm²) is more efficient in targeting ongoing luteolysis (63%) than using any day from Days 14 to ≥19 (efficiency/day, 10-24%). The hypothesis that PRL has a role in luteolysis was supported but was confounded by the known positive effect of LH on progesterone. The hypothesis was supported that the synchrony of PGFM and PRL pulses represents a positive effect of PGF_2α on PRL, rather than an effect of PRL on PGF_2α.     

Temporal associations among pulses of 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF2alpha, luteal blood flow, and luteolysis in cattle

Luteal blood flow was studied in heifers by transrectal color-Doppler ultrasound. Data were normalized to the decrease in plasma progesterone to <1 ng/ml (Day 0 or Hour 0). Blood flow in the corpus luteum (CL) was estimated by the percentage of CL area with color flow signals. Systemic prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF) treatment (25 mg; n=4) resulted in a transient increase in CL blood flow during the initial portion of the induced decrease in progesterone. Intrauterine treatment (1 or 2 mg) was done to preclude hypothetical secondary effects of systemic treatment. Heifers were grouped into responders (luteolysis; n=3) and nonresponders (n=5). Blood flow increased transiently in both groups; induction of increased blood flow did not assure the occurrence of luteolysis. A transient increase in CL blood flow was not detected in association with spontaneous luteolysis when examinations were done every 12 h (n=6) or 24 h (n=10). The role of PGF pulses was studied by examinations every hour during a 12-h window each day during expected spontaneous luteolysis. At least one pulse of 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF2alpha (PGFM) was identified in each of six heifers during the luteolytic period (Hours -48 to -1). Blood flow increased (P<0.02) during the 3-h ascending portion of the PGFM pulse, remained elevated for 2 h after the PGFM peak, and then decreased (P<0.03) to baseline. Results supported the hypothesis that CL blood flow increased and decreased with individual PGFM pulses during spontaneous luteolysis.     

Concentrations of circulating hormones during the interval between pulses of a PGF2α metabolite in mares and heifers

The temporal relationship of several hormones to a metabolite of prostaglandin F2α (PGFM) was studied in mares and heifers from the beginning of the first PGFM pulse during luteolysis to the end of the second pulse. Mares (n=7) were selected with a 9-h interval between the peaks of the two pulses. In mares, estradiol-17β (estradiol) increased (P<0.05) within each PGFM pulse and plateaued for a mean of 6h between the pulses, resulting in a stepwise estradiol increase. Progesterone decreased linearly (P<0.0001) throughout the intra-pulse and inter-pulse intervals of PGFM. In heifers (n=6), inter-pulse intervals were variable, and therefore Hours 1-4 of the first pulse (Hour 0=PGFM peak) and Hours -4 to -1 of the second pulse were used to represent the mean 8-h interval between peaks of the two pulses. Estradiol increased (P<0.05) during the ascending portion of each PGFM pulse and then decreased (P<0.05) beginning at Hour -1 of the first PGFM pulse and Hour 0 of the second pulse. The 1-h delay during the second pulse was accompanied by an apparent increase in PRL. A transient decrease in estradiol occurred in individuals between PGFM pulses at a mean of 5h after the first PGFM peak, concomitant with a transient LH increase (P<0.05). Results indicated that estradiol plateaued in mares and fluctuated in heifers during the interval between PGFM pulses. Heifers also showed temporal relationships between estradiol and LH and apparently between estradiol and PRL.     

Ovarian and PGF2α responses to stimulation of endogenous PRL pulses during the estrous cycle in mares

The effects of a PRL-stimulating substance (sulpiride) on PRL and PGF2α secretion and on luteal and ovarian follicular dynamics were studied during the estrous cycle in mares. A control group (n = 9) and a sulpiride group (Sp; n = 10) were used. Sulpiride (25 mg) was given every 8 h from Day 13 postovulation to the next ovulation. Repeated sulpiride treatment did not appear to maintain PRL concentrations at 12-h intervals beyond Day 14. Therefore, the hypothesis that a long-term increase in PRL altered luteal and follicular end points was not testable. Hourly samples were collected from the hour of a treatment (Hour 0) to Hour 8 on Day 14. Concentrations of PRL increased to maximum at Hour 4 in the Sp group. The PRL pulses were more prominent (P < 0.008) in the sulpiride group (peak, 19.4 ± 1.9 ng/mL; mean ± SEM) than in the controls (11.5 ± 1.8 ng/mL). Concentrations of a metabolite of PGF2α (PGFM), number, and characteristics of PGFM pulses, and concentrations of progesterone during Hours 0 to 8 were not affected by the increased PRL. A novel observation was that the peak of a PRL pulse occurred at the same hour or 1 h later than the peak of a PGFM pulse in 8 of 8 PGFM pulses in the controls and in 6 of 10 pulses in the Sp group (P < 0.04), indicating that sulpiride interfered with the synchrony between PGFM and PRL pulses. The hypothesis that sulpiride treatment during the equine estrous cycle increases concentrations of PRL and the prominence of PRL pulses was supported.     

Role of LH in the progesterone increase during the bromocriptine-induced prolactin decrease in heifers

The luteotrophic effect of bromocriptine in heifers was studied to determine if the reported posttreatment increase in progesterone (P4) just before or at the beginning of luteolysis was attributable to loss of a luteolytic effect of prolactin (PRL) or to the stimulation of LH, a known luteotropin. Four treatment groups (n = 7) were used: control (Ct), bromocriptine (Bc; 16 mg/heifer), acyline (Ac; 3 μg/kg), and bromocriptine and acyline combined (BcAc). Bromocriptine (inhibitor of PRL) and acyline (antagonist of GnRH and therefore blocker of LH) were given at Hour 0 on Day 16 postovulation, and blood samples were taken hourly at Hours 0 to 8. Concentration of P4 was greater (P < 0.05) in the Bc group than in the Ct group at each of Hours 1 to 8. Concentration of LH increased (P < 0.05) between Hours 0 to 2 in the Bc group but not in the other three groups. The peak of the first posttreatment LH pulse occurred earlier in the Bc group than in the Ct group. Average concentration of PRL was lower (P < 0.05) and number of PRL pulses was less (P < 0.05) in the Bc group than in the Ct group. Acyline inhibited LH in the Ac and BcAc groups as indicated by a decrease (P < 0.05) in concentration between Hours 0 and 2 and a decrease (P < 0.001) in number of pulses/heifer during the 8 h. A decrease in PRL but not an increase in P4 and LH occurred in the BcAc group. Results supported the hypothesis that the P4 increase associated with PRL suppression by bromocriptine treatment is attributable to an increase in LH.     

Hormone concentration changes temporally associated with the hour of transition from preluteolysis to luteolysis in mares

The temporal associations of cortisol, estradiol-17β, and oxytocin with pulses of PGFM at the common hour of transition between preluteolysis and luteolysis was studied in plasma from hourly blood samples in mares (n=8). The transitional hour was determined from progesterone concentrations and occurred between 2PM and 2AM in all mares. Pulses of PGFM were grouped into those occurring at the last pulse of preluteolysis (preluteolytic pulse), at the hour of transition (transitional), and during luteolysis (luteolytic). The preluteolytic PGFM pulse (45±16pg/ml at peak) and transitional pulse (42±7pg/ml) are reportedly less prominent than the first luteolytic pulse (193±36pg/ml). Cortisol increased (P<0.05) between -1h and 0h (peak) and then decreased (P<0.05) within the hours of the luteolytic PGFM pulse but did not change within the preluteolytic and transitional pulses. Estradiol increased (P<0.006) during -3 to 2h of the luteolytic pulse but not for the other pulses. Oxytocin differed for the hours of the transitional PGFM pulse (P<0.02) and the luteolytic pulse (P<0.03) but did not differ significantly during the hours of the last preluteolytic pulse. Oxytocin increased (P<0.05) between -3h and 0h and then decreased (P<0.05) within each of the transitional and the luteolytic pulses. The oxytocin results are novel and support the hypothesis that on a temporal basis oxytocin in association with PGF2α accounts for the transition between preluteolysis and luteolysis within a single hour in mares, despite the small transitional PGFM pulse.     

Temporal relationships of a pulse of prolactin (PRL) to a pulse of a metabolite of PGF2α in mares

Hourly blood samples were collected from 10 mares during 24 h of each of the preluteolytic, luteolytic, and postluteolytic periods. The autocorrelation function of the R program was used to detect pulse rhythmicity, and the intra-assay CV was used to locate and characterize pulses of prolactin (PRL) and a metabolite of prostaglandin F2α (PGFM). Rhythmicity of PRL and PGFM concentrations was detected in 67% and 89% of mares, respectively. Combined for the three periods (no difference among periods), the PRL pulses were 5.2 ± 0.4 h (mean ± SEM) at the base, 7.5 ± 1.5 h between nadirs of adjacent pulses, and 12.3 ± 1.5 h from peak to peak. The peaks of PRL pulses were greater (P < 0.05) during the luteolytic period (46 ± 14 ng/mL) and postluteolytic period (52 ± 15 ng/mL) than during the preluteolytic period (17 ± 3 ng/mL). Concentrations of PRL during hours of a PGFM pulse were different (P < 0.003) within the luteolytic period and postluteolytic period and were greatest at the PGFM peak; PRL concentrations during a PGFM pulse were not different during the preluteolytic period. The frequency of the peak of PRL and PGFM pulses occurring at the same hour (synchrony) was greater for the luteolytic period (65%, P < 0.01) and postluteolytic period (50%, P < 0.001) than for the preluteolytic period (17%). This is the first report in mares on characterization and rhythmicity of PRL pulses, synchrony between PRL and PGFM pulses, and greater PRL activity during the luteolytic and postluteolytic periods than during the preluteolytic period.     

Pulses of prolactin before, during, and after luteolysis and synchrony with pulses of a metabolite of prostaglandin F2α in heifers

Pulses of prolactin (PRL) and a metabolite of prostaglandin F2α (PGFM) were determined from hourly blood samples collected before, during, and after luteolysis (n=7 heifers). Progesterone concentrations were used to partition the results into six 12-h sets from 12h before to 36h after luteolysis. Pulses of PRL with a nadir-to-nadir interval of 4.4±0.2h were detected in each 12-h set. Pulses were rhythmic (P<0.05) in six heifers, beginning 12h before the end of luteolysis. The peak of a PRL pulse was greater (P<0.05) for the 12h after the end of luteolysis than for other 12-h sets, except for the last set of luteolysis. Area under the curve of a pulse was greater (P<0.05) for the 24h that encompassed the end of luteolysis than for two previous 12-h sets. Synchrony between the peaks of PRL and PGFM pulses was greater (P<0.03) during and after luteolysis (same hour for 29/39 pairs) than before luteolysis (0/12). Concentration of PRL centralized to the peak (Hour 0) of PGFM pulses was greater (P<0.05) at Hours 0 and 1 than at Hours -2, -1, and 3. Results supported the hypothesis that PRL is secreted in pulses in heifers. The pulses were most prominent and rhythmic during the last 12h of luteolysis and thereafter. The pulse peaks of PRL and PGFM were synchronized for most PRL pulses during and after luteolysis.     

Induction of PGFM pulses and luteolysis by sequential estradiol-17β treatments in heifers

The effects of sequential induction of PGFM pulses by estradiol-17β (E2) on prominence of PGFM pulses and progesterone (P4) concentration were studied in heifers. Three treatments of vehicle (n = 12) or E2 (n = 12) at doses of 0.05 or 0.1 mg were given at 12-h intervals beginning on Day 15 postovulation. Blood samples were collected every 12 h from Days 13-24 and hourly for 12 h after the first and third treatments. On Day 15, all heifers were in preluteolysis and on Day 16 were in preluteolysis in the vehicle-treated heifers (n = 11) and either preluteolysis (n = 4) or luteolysis (n = 8) in the E2-treated heifers. Peak concentration of induced PGFM pulses during preluteolysis on Day 15 was greater (P < 0.04) than for pulses during preluteolysis on Day 16. The interval from ovulation to the beginning of luteolysis was shorter (P < 0.04) in the E2-treated heifers than in the vehicle-treated heifers. An E2-induced PGFM pulse was less prominent (P < 0.008) in heifers in temporal association with a transient resurgence in P4 than in heifers with a progressive P4 decrease. The hypothesis that repeated E2 exposure stimulates increasing prominence of PGFM pulses was not supported. Instead, repeated exposure reduced the prominence of PGFM pulses, in contrast to the stimulation from the first E2 treatment. Reduced prominence of a PGF_2α pulse during luteolysis can lead to a transient resurgence in P4 concentration.     

Stimulation of a pulse of LH and reduction in PRL concentration by a physiologic dose of GnRH before, during, and after luteolysis in heifers

A single physiologic dose (5.0 μg) of GnRH was given to 9 heifers each day (Hour 0) beginning on Day 15 postovulation until regression of the corpus luteum. Blood samples were taken each day for Hours -3, -2, -1, 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.50, 1.75, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Based on daily progesterone concentrations, data were grouped into phases of before (n=4), during (n=8), and after (n=7) luteolysis. The number of LH pulses with a peak at pretreatment Hours -2 or -1 (0.35 ± 0.12 pulses/sampling session) was less (P<0.0001) than for a pulse peak at posttreatment Hours 1 or 2 (1.0 ± 0.0 pulses/session). The characteristics and effects of LH pulses on progesterone and estradiol were similar between natural (pretreatment) and primarily induced (posttreatment) LH pulses. The same dose of GnRH stimulated an LH pulse with greater (P<0.05) amplitude after luteolysis than during luteolysis. Concentrations of PRL and number and prominence of PRL pulses decreased (P<0.05) between Hours 0 and 2 within each of the phases of before, during, and after luteolysis. The hypothesis that a physiologic dose of GnRH increases the concentration of PRL was not supported; instead, GnRH reduced the concentration of PRL. Results supported the hypotheses that an appropriate dose of GnRH stimulates an LH pulse during luteolysis that is similar to a natural pulse in characteristics and in the effects on progesterone and estradiol.     

Temporal interrelationships at 15-min intervals among oxytocin, LH, and progesterone during a pulse of a prostaglandin F2α metabolite in heifers

A pulse of a PGF2α metabolite (PGFM) was induced by treatment with 0.1 mg of estradiol-17β on Day 15 (Day 0=ovulation; n=9 heifers). Blood samples were taken every 15 min for 9h beginning at treatment (Hour 0). For PGFM and LH, an intraassay-CV method was used to detect fluctuations in the 15-min samples and pulses in the hourly samples. A mean of 6.9 ± 0.4 PGFM fluctuations/9 h were superimposed on the hourly PGFM concentrations, compared to 2.1 ± 0.5 LH fluctuations/9 h (P<0.02). An increase (P<0.02) in oxytocin began 15 min before the beginning nadir of the PGFM pulse. A transient increase in progesterone did not occur at the beginning nadir of the PGFM pulse. Progesterone decreased (P<0.02) during the ascending portion and increased (P<0.03) as a rebound during the descending portion of the PGFM pulse. The peak of an LH pulse occurred 1.5 ± 0.4 h (range, 0.25-2.75 h) after the peak of the PGFM pulse. The wide range in the interval from a PGFM peak to an LH peak obscured the contribution of increasing LH to the rebound. The results did not support the hypothesis that oxytocin and PGFM increase concurrently. Results supported the hypothesis that the immediate transient progesterone increase that has been demonstrated with exogenous PGF2α does not occur during the ascending portion of an endogenous PGFM pulse. The hypothesis that the progesterone rebound after the peak of a PGFM pulse is temporally related to an LH pulse was supported.     

Effects of prostaglandins, dibutyryl camp, LHRH, estrogens, progesterone, and potassium on output of prostaglandin F2α, 13, 14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F2α, HCG, estradiol, and progesterone by placental minces

In order to compare the endocrine response of placental minces to luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) and dibutyryl cAMP (dbcAMP) and to screen for effects of potential stimulatory and inhibitory substances, the simultaneous outputs of PGF_2α, 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F_2α (PGFM), progesterone, 17β-estradiol, and hCG were evaluated during a 4 hour incubation in 5 placentas. The output of hCG was highest for 12-week placentas, intermediate for a 16 week placenta, and lowest for term placentas. The output of 17β-estradiol by 12 and 16 week placentas in the presence of 30 μM dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) was greater than that by term placentas. Progesterone output was apparently independent of gestational age although some variation between 12-week placentas was demonstrated. Output of PGF_2α was lower in 12 and 16-week placentas than in term placentas and that of PGFM was lower in 12-week placentas than in term placentas. LHRH (100 nM) produced stimulation of PGF_2α output (P<.005) and a trend toward inhibition of progesterone output (which failed to achieve statistical significance) but no stimulation of hCG under these conditions. Stimulation of the outputs of hCG (P<.005) and PGF_2α (P<.001) and inhibition of that of progesterone (P<.005) was produced by 20 mM dbcAMP. DHEAS inhibited output of progesterone (P<.01) and PGF_2α (P<.01). There were no effects of potassium, estrogens, progesterone, or prostaglandins on output of any measured substance.     

Effect of prostaglandin F2α on ovarian and pituitary function in the mid-luteal phase

The effects of PGF_2α infusion in a dose of 25 μg/min for 5 hours on serum levels of estradiol-17β, progesterone, LH, FSH, TSH and prolactin, and on the pituitary hormone responsiveness to LRH and TRH were studied in 10 apparently healthy cycling women in the mid-luteal phase. No systematic alteration was seen in the pituitary and ovarian hormone levels during PGF_2α infusion, and the pituitary hormone responses to releasing hormones were unaffected. Ovarian steroid production increased in response to increased gonadotropin levels after LRH injection during PGF_2α administration. These results confirm that PGF_2α is not luteolytic in humans and no apparent relationship between PGF_2α and pituitary hormone secretion exists.     

Effect of estradiol-17β on peripheral plasma concentration of 15-keto,14-dihydro PGF2α and luteolysis in cyclic cattle

Friesian heifers (n = 10) were assigned randomly to receive an intravenous injection of estradiol-17^β (E₂; 3 mg) or saline: ethanol vehicle solution (6 ml; 1:1) on day 13 of the estrous cycle. Blood was collected collected from the jugular vein by venipuncture into heparinized vacutainer tubes at 30 minute intervals for 2 hours (h) preinjection, 10.5 h postinjection and then at 3 h intervals until estrus. Repeated hormone measurements of 15-keto-13,14-dihydro-PGF_2α (PGFM) and progesterone (P₄) were evaluated by split-plot analysis of variance. Mean concentration of PGFM for the 12.5 h acute sampling phase was 164.1 ± .14 pg/ml. A treatment by time interaction was detected (P < .01). After treatment with E₂, PGFM concentrations began to increase at approximately 3.5 h, reached a mean peak of 330.4 ± 44.5 pg/ml (n = 5) at 5.5 ± .3 h, and returned to basal concentration by 9.0 ± .6 h. Vehicle treatment did not alter concentrations of PGFM. Injections of E₂ on day 13 of the estrous cycle caused luteolysis (P₄ concentration < 1 ng/ml) to occur earlier following injection (96.9 ± 10.6 h < 153.6 ±17.7 h; P, 0.05) than did the vehicle control treatment. During the chronic sampling phase of 3 h intervals, 39 of 606 samples (6.4%) were classified as PGFM spikes (323.0 ± 50.0 pg/ml); 21 (53%) of the spikes occurred at a mean interval of 18.9 ± 3.86 h before the time of completed luteolysis. Exogenous E₂ induced an acute increase in PGFM that may be indicative of uterine PGF_2α production. Peaks of PGFM in plasma were temporally associated with luteolysis on a within cow basis.