The inadequate smear: does it matter?

The objective of this study was to quantify the incidence of underlying cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) among women referred for colposcopy with three consecutive inadequate smears. The design was a retrospective cohort study analysing data from a regional colposcopy database at Cervical Screening Wales. Women who were referred to all the colposcopy clinics in Wales with three consecutive inadequate smears, the third inadequate smear being taken between 1 April 2001 and 31 March 2002 constituted the study population. The results of the fourth smear taken at the colposcopy clinic after three consecutive inadequate smears, the worst biopsy results from any of the subsequent colposcopies and the relationship between the result of the fourth smear taken at colposcopy clinic and any histology result were the main outcome measures. The accuracy of the colposcopic opinion was also examined. Of the 433 women identified as having been referred because of three consecutive inadequate smears, 302 were linked to either a subsequent smear and/or a biopsy result. An adequate smear result was available for 85% of these women when the smear was taken in the colposcopy clinic; 77% were reported as negative and 8% were abnormal. Of the 347 women seen in the colposcopy clinic, high-grade CIN was seen in 3% and low-grade lesion in 8%. The sensitivity and specificity of the fourth inadequate smear test in predicting underlying CIN were 15% and 84% respectively, with a positive predictive value of 8%. The sensitivity and specificity of colposcopy in predicting histological CIN among patients with three inadequate smears was 70% and 49%, respectively, and the positive predictive value was 44%. This study raises the question as to whether three consecutive inadequate smears should be considered as an indication for colposcopy, or merely for a further smear to be taken in circumstances where there is a greater likelihood getting an adequate result.     

Assessment of the Accuracy of Cytology In Women Referred For Colposcopy and Biopsy: the Results of a 1 Year Audit

The results of weekly colposcopy review meetings have been audited for 1 year and cases where there was a discrepancy between the referral cervical smear and the initial colposcopy biopsy have been analysed. New referrals (n = 476) for colposcopy were studied. In the final outcome 80% of 326 women referred for moderate or severe dyskaryosis were found to have cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade II or III or invasive carcinoma. Three women found to have invasive carcinoma had been referred for severely dyskaryotic smears. Twenty women were referred for smears with cell changes suggesting glandular neoplasia: five were found to have adenocarcinoma in situ, whereas eight had CIN and seven had negative biopsies. The results justify the referral policy and demonstrate the need for further investigation when initial colposcopic biopsies are negative.     

Five-year follow-up of women with borderline and mildly dyskaryotic cervical smears

This study investigated the 5-year follow-up status of women with cervical smears showing borderline nuclear changes (BNC) or mild dyskaryosis and the effect of koilocytosis on the outcome. Thirteen per cent of women with cervical smears showing BNC had high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). In contrast, 28% of women with cervical smears showing mild dyskaryosis had high-grade CIN. The presence of koilocytosis (24% for borderline smears and 34% for mild dyskaryotic smears) did not appear to influence the risk of developing high-grade CIN. Our results suggest that the simultaneous implementation of the British Society for Clinical Cytology proposed terminology and the colposcopy guidelines from the British Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology could have an impact on colposcopy services.     

Is a liquid‐based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?

K. Sigurdsson
Is a liquid‐based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear? Background: The comparative sensitivity of liquid‐based cytology (LBC) test and conventional Papanicolaou (Pap) smears is controversial. Material and methods: This study analyses the distribution of cytology, histology, colposcopy and large loop excision of the transformation zone among women screened in Iceland with LBC at the Cancer Detection Clinic in Reykjavik and with a conventional Pap smear outside the Detection Clinic in 2007–2011. The study material included 42 654 LBC tests from 20 439 women and 103 909 Pap smears from 61 574 women. The period 2000–2004 is used to correct for potential bias as a result of unequal distribution of the studied parameters between the study sites before the introduction of LBC. Results: The observed results indicated that women screened with an LBC sample had significantly decreased detection rates of inadequate smears, increased detection of low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL)/atypical cytology and referrals to colposcopy, and an increased detection rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) irrespective of age. LBC increased significantly the detection rates of high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse (HSIL+) cytology and CIN3+ histology only in women under 40 years of age. Taking into consideration the unequal prevalence of the studied parameters between the study sites in 2000–2004 indicated, however, that LBC only affected the rate of inadequate and low‐grade cytology tests under the age of 40 years. Positive predictive values for CIN2+ were not significantly different between the tests. Conclusions: The study results support the view that LBC is no more sensitive than Pap smears for the detection of HSIL+ and CIN2+ irrespective of age. LBC decreased the rate of inadequate smears, but increased the rate of low‐grade cytology under the age of 40 years and decreased the total rate of abnormal smears over the age of 40 years.     

Review of cervical smears from 76 women with invasive cervical cancer: cytological findings and medicolegal implications

OBJECTIVE: To review cervical smears from 76 women which were taken prior to the diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer and to determine the appropriateness of the cytology reports issued on the smears. METHODS: Cervical smears, clinical records, cervical smear history and cytology reports from 76 women with invasive cervical cancer were reviewed. After microscopic review of the cervical smears, the cases were divided into two groups: Group 1 comprised 50 women who were found to have had at least one false-negative (F/N) smear report prior to the diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer. Group 2 comprised 26 women for whom no evidence of F/N reporting was found. RESULTS: A total of 209 cervical smears from the 50 women in group 1 were available for review (range 2-12 smears per woman); 100 of the 209 smears were considered to have been reported appropriately. Ninety-seven smears which had been reported originally as negative or inadequate were found, on review, to contain numerous severely dyskaryotic cells and were reclassified as F/N smears. All of the 50 women had at least one F/N smear and 29 had two or more. Twelve smears from eight women contained only a few (<200 severely dyskaryotic cells). Forty women developed invasive squamous carcinoma and 10 developed invasive adenocarcinoma. The stage at diagnosis ranged from 1A to stage 4. Seventy-one smears from the 24 women in group 2 were available for review (range 1-15 smears per woman). In two cases included in group 2, no smears were provided for review as the smears had been lost or mislaid. Review of the 71 smears confirmed the accuracy of the original cytological classification of the smear. Nineteen women were diagnosed with squamous cancer, two microinvasive cancer, one glassy cell, two adenocarcinomas, and one with adenosquamous carcinoma. One women was found to have an embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of the corpus uteri involving the cervix. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The medicolegal implications are discussed in the light of the above findings. Evidence of breach of duty of care was presented in all 50 cases in group I although causation was not established in every case. There was no evidence of failure of duty of care in terms of the standard of the cervical cytology reports issued or standard of clinical management in 17 of the 26 cases in group 2. However, in seven of the 26 cases in group 2, clinical management of the case was substandard due to failure to investigate symptoms of irregular bleeding regardless of a negative cytology report (two cases), failure to act upon a suspicious smear report or consecutive inadequate smear reports (two cases), failure of follow-up after treatment of CIN3 (two cases) and histological misdiagnosis (one case).     

The use of screening episodes linked to CIN3 and invasive cancer registrations to study outcomes from the NHS Cervical Screening Programme

Objective: To examine how NHS cervical screening data can be collected and analysed in order to evaluate women’s screening histories as episodes rather than as individual smears. Design: Analysis of routine cervical screening data grouped into screening episodes for a cohort of women regarding episodes starting in a given year. Setting: NHS Cervical Screening Programme. Population: Data from four Health Authorities (now eight Primary Care Trusts) from the NHS Cervical Screening Programme with primary smears (first in an episode) taken between 1 April 1999 and 31 March 2000. Methods: Cytology information obtained from the call/recall (‘Exeter’) computer system was linked to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 and invasive cancer outcome information obtained from cancer registries. Screening histories were divided into episodes, each starting with a primary smear that was followed up to episode closure or, for episodes still open followed for an average 4.25 years, from the primary smear. The episode was divided into two parts (up to referral to colposcopy and following the referral). The outcomes of the episodes are described including referral rate to colposcopy and CIN3 and invasive cancer rates by factors such as age. Main outcome measures: Episode histories and rates of referral to colposcopy, CIN3 and invasive cancer. Results: There were 176 923 episodes from 176 319 women (1.003 episodes per woman) followed up to March 2004, the date at which the first phase of information accrual ceased. Of these episodes, 172 100 (97.3%) were closed either by a negative smear referring the woman back to routine recall or by default (defined as no smear recorded within 21 months following a smear requiring an action of repeat or refer to colposcopy). The remaining 4823 (2.7%) of episodes were still open, of which in 3121 (1.8%) the woman had been referred to colposcopy and in 1702 (1.0%) no referral decision had been made. Referral rates to colposcopy varied by age from 5.7% in women aged 20–24 years down to 0.9% in women aged 60–64 years. The overall efficiency of screening was highest for woman aged about 30 years, with a CIN3 detection rate of eight per 1000 women and a positive predictive value (for CIN3 or worse) of referral to colposcopy of 21%. Conclusion: The study has shown that routinely collected NHS cervical screening data can be combined to give information on complete episodes, allowing important performance measures to be studied. We suggest that in future information in the NHS screening system should be structured to facilitate such analysis and to allow cytology and histology information to be readily linked.     

The role of cervical cytology and colposcopy in detecting cervical glandular neoplasia

Objective:  To determine the role of cervical cytology and colposcopy in the management of endocervical neoplasia.
Setting:  Colposcopy unit and cytology laboratory in a teaching hospital.
Sample:  Group 1 included 184 smears showing endocervical glandular neoplasia from 129 patients and group 2 included 101 patients with histology showing endocervical abnormalities in a 6-year period (1993–1998). Follow-up of 6–11 years to 2004 was available.
Methods:  Group 1 were identified from the cytology computer records. Group 2 were identified from histology records on the cytology database and a record of histology cases kept for audit purposes. The clinical records were examined retrospectively.
Results:  The positive predictive value (PPV) of abnormal endocervical cells in smears was 81.1% for significant glandular/squamous [cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN)/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade2 (CIN2 or worse)] lesions. The PPV of colposcopy was 93.5% for significant glandular/squamous lesions of the cervix. The postcolposcopy probability of a significant lesion when colposcopy was normal was 87.5%. The sensitivity of colposcopy in detecting endocervical lesions was 9.8%. The sensitivity of cervical smears in detecting a significant endocervical abnormality (CGIN or worse) was 66.3%. The false negative rate for cytology of endocervical glandular lesions was 4.0%.
Conclusions:  Endocervical glandular neoplasia detected on cytology is predictive of significant cervical pathology even when colposcopy is normal, which supports excisional biopsy in the primary assessment of these smears. The high concomitant squamous abnormality rate justifies the use of colposcopy to direct biopsies from the ectocervix. Cervical cytology is the only current screening method for cervical glandular abnormalities but sensitivity is poor.     

Outcome of three consecutive inadequate cervical smears

A retrospective audit of women with three consecutive inadequate cervical smears during 1998-99 was conducted at Birmingham Heartlands Hospital. The commonest reasons were obscured by polymorphs (34.5%) and sparse cellularity (28.9%). Seventy-three per cent (73%) were followed up at colposcopy and 22.1% had histological assessment; 15.9% of women had an abnormality detected, 10.6% with abnormal histology and 5.3% with a cytological abnormality only. Cytological abnormalities were seen in 11.1% of the screening population. This study did not identify a cytological criterion to differentiate those that would or would not have an abnormality on follow-up. It is suggested that all women with three consecutive inadequate smears should have adequate follow-up, although this may place increased demands on colposcopy services.     

A retrospective clinical audit of cervical smears reported as 'glandular neoplasia'.

The aims of this study were to review the diagnostic pathway of women with smears reported as 'glandular neoplasia' and to outline the management, colposcopy findings, treatment and final histological diagnosis in these women. The design was a retrospective review. A total of 114 women were identified over a 5-year period from the cytology database at the Royal Liverpool University Hospital Cytology Department, whose hospital case notes were available for review. Methods included a review of the case notes for the demographic details, indication for smear, colposcopic findings, investigation and/or treatment procedures, histology, final diagnosis and current disease status. Of 114 smears reported as 'glandular neoplasia', 67 were reported as consistent with cervical glandular intra-epithelial neoplasia (CGIN), six with endocervical adenocarcinoma, 36 with endometrial adenocarcinoma and five with other glandular neoplastic abnormalities. The average age was 46.5 years. 79 (69.3%) smears were routine call/recall and 36 (30.7%) women were symptomatic. The positive predictive value (PPV) for a significant histological abnormality in the CGIN smear group was 80.6% (23.9% invasive carcinomas, 43.3% CGIN and 13.4% CIN) and the PPV of an 'endometrial adenocarcinoma' smear was 86.1%. Smears indicating glandular neoplasia are associated with a high probability of clinically significant lesions, the PPV of a CGIN smear being over 80%. Immediate referral for colposcopy and assessment by an experienced colposcopist is recommended.     

O-2Preliminary results of the ARTISTIC study: a randomised trial in screening to improve cytology

Annually in the UK around 250 000 cervical smears show low-grade abnormalities. Alternative management policies following a low-grade smear are cytological surveillance or referral for colposcopy. Their effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and the potential for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing to triage women to either management, has been debated. Trial of management of borderline and other low-grade abnormal smears (TOMBOLA) (a large RCT) addresses these uncertainties, considering clinical, psychosocial and economic outcomes. 4439 women aged 20–59, resident in Grampian, Tayside or Nottingham with a low-grade smear were randomised to cytological surveillance (six-monthly smears in primary care) or hospital-based colposcopy. At colposcopy, women with visible abnormality were randomised to immediate treatment or biopsy and recall for treatment if necessary. Recruitment HPV status was assessed using PCR techniques. Women were followed for three years to an exit colposcopy. Cumulative incidence of CIN2 or more severe disease (CIN2+) in the colposcopy arm was 7.9% per year, higher than in cytological surveillance (5.8%; OR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.23–1.67). This difference was less marked for CIN3+ (OR = 1.27, 1.04–1.55), suggesting spontaneous regression of some CIN2, and that initial colposcopy can lead to over-treatment. There was little difference in psychosocial outcomes between arms. In comparison of biopsy and recall versus immediate treatment, there was no difference in cumulative incidence of CIN2+ or psychosocial outcomes. There was over-treatment and increased frequency/duration of bleeding with immediate treatment. There was no compelling economic reason to favour any one management method. Testing for HPV does not appear to be effective in triage. Based on these findings, we make management recommendations for women with low-grade smears.     

Cytological Changes Associated With Tubo-Endometrioid Metaplasia of the Uterine Cervix

Two women who had undergone previous cervical surgery for the treatment of glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (GIN) and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), were found to have severely dyskaryotic cells of glandular and metaplastic type in follow-up cervical smears. A third patient was found to have similar abnormal cells in a routine screening smear. All of the patients were subjected to either hysterectomy or cervical conization and in all cases histological examination showed tubo-endometrioid glands in the endocervix, well away from the uterine isthmus, with no associated endometrial stromal tissue. All of the cervical smears were reviewed and cytological features that facilitate the distinction between tubo-endometrioid metaplasia and squamous or glandular dyskaryosis were identified. These features include the smaller size of affected cells, more marked nuclear hyperchromasia, inconspicuous nucleoli, the formation of glandular structures, the lack of discrete squamous dyskaryosis and the absence of the typical 'feathering' noted with GIN. the possibility of tubo-endometrioid metaplasia should be considered when atypical glandular or metaplastic cells are noted in cervical smears, particularly, but not exclusively, in women who have been treated for CIN or GIN. In the presence of these changes clinicians should rebiopsy the cervix before embarking on further unnecessary surgery which may adversely affect fertility and pregnancy, particularly in younger patients.     

Inflammatory atypia and the false-negative smear in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

The effectiveness of cervical cytologic screening is compromised by the increasingly recognized prevalence of false-negative smears. Our previous studies suggested that some false-negative cytologies can be accounted for by smears showing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) reported as inflammatory atypia; we found that at least 4% of 5,752 consecutive smears had been underreported in this manner. In the present study, that data was reanalyzed to derive 95% confidence limits for the number of CIN smears reported as inflammatory atypia. Using several differing estimates of cytologic screening sensitivity, it is speculated that, under certain testable assumptions, colposcopy of patients with cytologic diagnoses of inflammatory atypia may be one cost-effective approach to finding CIN cases missed by screening. If confirmed, these findings imply that laboratory quality assurance efforts, traditionally directed to the most serious cytologic diagnoses, should also focus in part on nondysplastic atypia.     

Prevalence of high-grade CIN following mild dyskaryotic smears in different age groups

OBJECTIVE: The new guidelines of the British Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology suggest that women should be offered colposcopy after only one mildly dyskaryotic smear. This is expected to generate increased workload for the colposcopy clinics, at least in the short term. The main objective of this study was to estimate the incidence of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in women with mildly dyskaryotic smears and investigate whether there is any variation in different age groups. The rationale was to determine whether we could reduce the burden on colposcopy services by prioritizing the mild dyskaryotic referrals by age, as we hypothesized that high-grade CIN is less frequent in younger women. METHODS: The study sample included all women who were referred for colposcopy with a cervical smear suggesting mild dyskaryosis (with or without koilocytosis) from April 2000 to March 2003. RESULTS: We studied 510 women. They were divided into three age groups (<20, 20-25 and >25 years). The overall prevalence of high-grade CIN (CIN II and III) was 28.7%.The positive predictive value of a mildly dyskaryotic smear for high-grade CIN was similar in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that we are not in a position to prioritize our referrals by age group and reduce the initial pressure for colposcopies. We are also concerned that with the implementation of the new guidelines, a significant number of women <25 years will be carrying high-grade CIN for more than 5 years before they are first screened.     

阴道镜及宫颈活组织检查对早期宫颈上皮内瘤变诊断价值分析

目的:探究阴道镜及宫颈活组织检查对早期宫颈上皮内瘤变(cervicalintraepithelialneoplasia,CIN)的诊断价值。方法:选择2015年3月至2018年5月于我院接受诊治的543例疑似宫颈上皮瘤变患者,分别对其实施阴道镜及宫颈活组织检查,以病理学检测结果为金标准,分别评估两种方式单独检测及联合检测对早期CIN的诊断一致性、灵敏度和特异度,并进行组间对比。结果:(1)543例疑似CIN患者病理诊断早期CIN阳性患者168例,阴性患者375例,诊断率为30.94%;阴道镜对早期CIN诊断发现阳性患者有143例,良性患者有400例,诊断率为26.34%;宫颈活组织检测对早期CIN诊断发现阳性患者有159例,良性患者有384例,诊断率为29.28%;阴道镜联合颈活组织检测对早期CIN诊断发现阳性患者有163例,良性患者有380例,诊断率为30.02%。(2)检测发现,阴道镜对早期CIN诊断一致性为81.77%,灵敏度为60.12%,特异度为91.47%。(3)宫颈活组织对早期CIN诊断一致性为91.71%,灵敏度为83.33%,特异度为95.47%。(4)阴道镜联合宫颈活组织对早期CIN诊断一致性为96.50%,灵敏度为92.86%,特异度为98.13%。(5)联合检测对早期CIN诊断的一致性、灵敏度和特异度均明显优于阴道镜及宫颈活组织单独检测。结论:阴道镜及宫颈活组织检测对早期CIN具有较好的诊断效果,但联合检测诊断准确率更高,适用于早期CIN临床筛查中。     

Risk of significant gynaecological pathology in women with ?glandular neoplasia on cervical cytology

A. Talaat, D. Brinkmann, J. Dhundee, Y. Hana, J. Bevan, R. Irvine, S. Bailey and R. Woolas
Risk of significant gynaecological pathology in women with ?glandular neoplasia on cervical cytology Objective: To review the risk of pre‐invasive and invasive gynaecological pathology in women referred with cervical cytology reporting ?glandular neoplasia. Methods: Review of the case notes of all women referred with cervical cytology reported as ?glandular neoplasia between January 1999 and December 2008 at two UK hospitals: Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust and Queen Mary’s Hospital Sidcup. The category of ‘borderline nuclear change in endocervical cells’, result code 8 according to the national health service cancer screening programme (NHSCSP), was excluded from the study. Results: A total of 200 women were identified using the hospitals’ pathology computer systems. Invasive carcinoma was found in 48 women (24%): 28 endocervical adenocarcinomas, eight squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), ten endometrial and two ovarian adenocarcinomas. Pre‐invasive neoplasia was found in 115 (57.5%), including 14 cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN), 31 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2/3 and 70 concomitant CGIN and CIN2/3. CIN1/HPV was found in 25, simple endometrial hyperplasia in three and no histological abnormality in three. Thirty‐four (70.8%) of 48 invasive carcinomas (of which 23 were endocervical adenocarcinomas) were in asymptomatic women investigated for abnormal cytology. Fourteen of 34 (41.4%) of those with ?glandular neoplasia thought to be endometrial were CGIN or CIN2/3. Colposcopic appearances were normal in 47.6% of women with pure cervical glandular neoplasia (adenocarcinoma or CGIN) compared with 12.8% with squamous cell lesions (CIN2/3 or SCC): P = 0.0001. Thus, colposcopy was more sensitive for detecting squamous cell abnormalities than their glandular counterparts. Although cervical adenocarcinomas are less amenable to prevention by screening than cervical SCC, in our study cervical cytology predominantly detected these abnormalities at their early asymptomatic stages. Conclusion: At least CIN2 was found in 81.5% in women referred with cervical cytology reporting ?glandular neoplasia. A thorough evaluation of the whole genital tract is needed if colposcopy is negative.     

HPV triage of women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a 3-year experience in an Italian organized programme

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to determine if Hybrid Capture II assay (HCII) on Liquid Based Cytology (LCB) improves the accuracy (higher sensitivity, similar specificity) than the repeat conventional Pap smear in smears with Atypical Squamous Cell (ASC) of Undetermined Significance diagnosis. METHODS: HPV testing was used to manage women, especially the older ones, with cervical abnormalities detected through our triennial organized screening in order to avoid unnecessary colposcopy and excessive follow-up if the woman is HPV negative. The HPV DNA Triage was offered without any charge to 909 women with ASC. The Bethesda System was used for the classification of these equivocal cytological findings and more precisely the 1991 version (ASCUS) until the summer 2001 (315 cases) and the new one 2001 classification (ASC-US and ASC-H) after this date (594 cases). The presence or absence of a cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade I or worse [CIN1+], and of grade II or worse [CIN2+], was confirmed by biopsy. RESULTS: The HPV DNA Triage showed a good accuracy (specificity over 94%, sensitivity of 37% and PPV for CIN2+ lesions around 30%). The higher values of ASC-H lesions (.462) for the sensitivity for CIN 2+ probably signify that this lesion is already a SIL. CONCLUSIONS: Our data were comparable with those recently published on the meta-analysis by Arbyn et al., confirming the promising approach of our guidelines for the treatment of these patients even in terms of Health Technology Assessment (HTA).     

Cervical smears in assessment of the natural history of human papillomavirus infections in prospectively followed women

The value of cervical (Papanicolaou) smears in monitoring the natural history of cervical human papillomavirus (HPV) infections was assessed in a series of 513 women prospectively followed since 1981. On each clinic visit, the patients were subjected to colposcopy accompanied by cervical smears and/or punch biopsies. The latter were analyzed by light microscopy for concomitant cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) for HPV particles as well as for HPV structural proteins. The stromal immunocompetent cell (ICC) infiltrates were phenotypically characterized using monoclonal antibodies for T-cell subsets, NK and K cells and Langerhans cells. HPV DNA typing was accomplished by Southern blot, spot and in situ hybridization using probes for HPV 6, 11, 16, 18 and 31. Lesions showing only changes consistent with HPV infection (HPV-NCIN) were associated with less severe atypia in cervical smears than were lesions with coexistent CIN (HPV-CIN). Normal smears were observed, however, in 24.7% of the cases with HPV-NCIN lesions, in 11.5% of cases with HPV-CIN I lesions but only exceptionally in cases with HPV-CIN II and III lesions (2.2% and 3.3%). The percentages of the different ICC phenotypes did not correlate with the atypia in cervical smears, but there was a shift towards the lower values of the T-helper/T-suppressor (OKT4+/OKT8+) cell ratio in parallel with increasing atypia. The possibility of latent HPV infection was suggested by the detection of viral particles, HPV antigens and HPV DNA in lesions shedding normal cells in the smears. The high-risk HPV types 16 and 18 were associated with the highest frequency of severely atypical cells; in the majority of cases, the low-risk types HPV 6 and 11 presented with less severe atypia. The first cervical smear seems to be of value as a predictor of the natural history of HPV lesions, as indicated by the fact that regression was inversely and progression directly related to initial cellular atypia. The present results confirm the intimate association between HPV infections and CIN. Although the biologic potential of the HPV infections seems to be dependent on multiple factors, routine cervical smears, because of their potential value in monitoring the natural history of this infection, should constitute an important means in the prospective follow-up of these patients.     

Koilocytosis; an indication for conservative management

The management of women with mild dyskaryosis continues to be the subject of debate. The management of cases with such smears could be improved if additional morphological features were found to be indicative of low/high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Our own experience in the routine audit of the diagnostic accuracy of cervical smears had suggested that cases of dyskaryosis with koilocytosis were associated with a low risk of CINIII. Two hundred and forty-four cervical smears reported as showing evidence of wart virus infection were reviewed and their subsequent histories noted. Of these smears, 173 demonstrated clear evidence of koilocytosis. Irrespective of the initial grade of dyskaryosis, only 28 cases (16.2%) had underlying CIN or had progressed to CIN over a minimum follow-up period of 21 months. Only two cases (1.2%) showed evidence of CINIII. Koilocytosis is associated with a low risk of CIN and an especially low risk of CINIII. The management of women with koilocytic smears should be modified accordingly.     

Koilocytosis; an indication for conservative management

The management of women with mild dyskaryosis continues to be the subject of debate. The management of cases with such smears could be improved if additional morphological features were found to be indicative of low/high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Our own experience in the routine audit of the diagnostic accuracy of cervical smears had suggested that cases of dyskaryosis with koilocytosis were associated with a low risk of CINIII. Two hundred and forty-four cervical smears reported as showing evidence of wart virus infection were reviewed and their subsequent histories noted. Of these smears, 173 demonstrated clear evidence of koilocytosis. Irrespective of the initial grade of dyskaryosis, only 28 cases (16.2%) had underlying CIN or had progressed to CIN over a minimum follow-up period of 21 months. Only two cases (1.2%) showed evidence of CINIII. Koilocytosis is associated with a low risk of CIN and an especially low risk of CINIII. The management of women with koilocytic smears should be modified accordingly.     

Borderline Nuclear Abnormality In Cervical Smears: A Cytological Review of 200 Cases With Histological Correlation

The cervical cytology and histology specimens from 200 patients referred to colposcopy with borderline nuclear abnormality were reviewed. Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated changes were identified in 103 of 200 (53%) referral smears and in 139 of 150 (91%) biopsy specimens. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) was less frequently diagnosed on review compared with the original histopathology reports (30.7%vs 45.4%); the discrepancy was largely attributable to a lower incidence of CINI. There was agreement in the grading of borderline nuclear abnormality in 161 of 200 referral smears following review. Twenty-three smears were upgraded to mild dyskaryosis, whereas 16 were reclassified as negative.