Observations on dicentrics in living cells

Summary In previously irradiated endosperm cells of Haemanthus katherinae studied in vitro by means of micro-cinematography, two-kinetochore chromatids and dicentric chromosomes have been observed. Breaking of such dicentric chromatids and chromosomes has been analysed. Behaviour of some of the dicentric chromosomes during anaphase deserves special attention: interlocking dicentrics cut one through another and rejoin in a few minutes. In this way from a metaphase interlocking dicentric, two sister anaphase dicentrics are formed. Interlocked dicentrics can also uncoil and not break at all. In this case no activity was observed in one kinetochore of one dicentric in later stages of anaphase (two kinetochores were active in one dicentric and only one in its sister). Analysis of chromosome movements in two-kinetochore chromatids and dicentrics is also presented.     

Meiosis in the male of Puto albicans (Coccoidea-Homoptera)

Cytologically, Puto has proved more primitive than its taxonomic position would indicate. In the single previously described example (Hughes-Schrader, 1944), an uncomplicated inverted meiotic sequence was described for the males. The present example, P. albicans, showed a significantly more primitive inverted sequence. Unlike the other examples reported for aphids and coccids, the chromatids of the dyads neither dissociated nor reassociated during interkinesis. Instead, they remained closely associated and interconnected by an unresolved terminal chiasmate attachment. At first metaphase, the spindle attachments were localized to a restricted region of the poleward surface of the chromatids. Localization of attachment during meiosis and close association of chromatids during interkinesis are both suggestive of similar but not identical conditions expected in ancestors with an uninverted meiotic sequence. A second species proved intermediate between P. albicans and that described by Hughes-Schrader in which a complete cycle of dissociation and reassociation occurred during interkinesis. In P. albicans the pachytene bivalents showed no structures suggestive of centric localizations. At their greatest condensation at first metaphase, the chromatids were clearly subdivided into half chromatids. Limited observations were made on chromosomes of other species of Puto and of Phenacoleachia zealandica, and also on spermiogenesis and mycetocyte formation in Puto. The discussion is devoted to considerations of chromatid subdivision, holokinetic chromosomes, and meiotic inversion and some evolutionary implications are mentioned.Supported by grant GB 4289 from the National Science Foundation.     

GFP tagging of budding yeast chromosomes reveals that protein–protein interactions can mediate sister chromatid cohesion

Background Precise control of sister chromatid separation is essential for the accurate transmission of genetic information. Sister chromatids must remain linked to each other from the time of DNA replication until the onset of chromosome segregation, when the linkage must be promptly dissolved. Recent studies suggest that the machinery that is responsible for the destruction of mitotic cyclins also degrades proteins that play a role in maintaining sister chromatid linkage, and that this machinery is regulated by the spindle-assembly checkpoint. Studies on these problems in budding yeast are hampered by the inability to resolve its chromosomes by light or electron microscopy.Results We have developed a novel method for visualizing specific DNA sequences in fixed and living budding yeast cells. A tandem array of 256 copies of the Lac operator is integrated at the desired site in the genome and detected by the binding of a green fluorescent protein (GFP)–Lac repressor fusion expressed from the HIS3 promoter. Using this method, we show that sister chromatid segregation precedes the destruction of cyclin B. In mad or bub cells, which lack the spindle-assembly checkpoint, sister chromatid separation can occur in the absence of microtubules. The expression of a tetramerizing form of the GFP–Lac repressor, which can bind Lac operators on two different DNA molecules, can hold sister chromatids together under conditions in which they would normally separate.Conclusions We conclude that sister chromatid separation in budding yeast can occur in the absence of microtubule-dependent forces, and that protein complexes that can bind two different DNA molecules are capable of holding sister chromatids together.     

An electron microscope study of nuclear and cell division in a dinoflagellate

Summary Light microscopical observations on the cell division of the small dinoflagellate Woloszynskia micra are correlated for the first time with an electron microscopical study. In prophase, whilst the nucleus enlarges and becomes pearshaped, the chromosomes divide to give pairs of chromatids. This process starts at one end and works to the other giving Y- and V-shaped chromosomes as it occurs. Cytoplasmic invaginations pass through the nucleus and by the end of prophase these are seen to contain a number of microtubules of about 180 Å diameter. There is no connection between the microtubules in the nuclear in vagination and either the flagellar bases or the chromosomes. At anaphase the nucleus expands laterally and the sister chromatids move towards opposite ends. The cell hypocone is now partially divided and the two longitudinal flagella well separate. The nucleus completes its division into two daughter nuclei and for a time portions of the cytoplasmic invaginations remain visible. Cell cleavage is completed by the division of the epicone. The nuclear membrane remains intact throughout division and the nucleolus does not break down.The mitotic division in this organism, which is unusual in comparison with the mitosis of higher organisms, is discussed in the light of other types of mitosis which have been reported and of earlier light microscopical observations on dinoflagellates.     

Mitosis with undivided chromosomes

Summary Cases of cell division with single chromatids are discussed in connection with a study on mitosis with undivided chromosomes made on living material of the endosperm of Haemanthus katharinae. Such divisions are known from certain abnormal mitoses in the microspores of a few plant species, and also from the second meiotic division, in which it is possible in numerous materials to study the behaviour of daughter univalents, and, in a few cases, also daughter chromosomes derived from chromosomes that were paired during the first division.The various cases of mitosis with single chromatids show a great variation with respect to the degree of scattering of the chromosomes over the spindle at metaphase. In a few cases there is practically no tendency to form a metaphase plate. In other cases the tendency to form such a plate is more or less pronounced, but also in these cases it is difficult for the chromosomes to form this arrangement. Some of them remain scattered over the spindle. After the metaphase a kind of anaphase usually follows in which the single chromatids, without division, move to the poles, often with other chromosomes lagging in intermediate positions.An approach of chromosomes to the poles may be caused by two different mechanisms in mitoses of this kind and only in a few cases is the information sufficient to show that active centromere movements occur during these anaphases.In many aspects of their behaviour on the spindle, single chromatids are similar to ordinary univalents of the first meiotic division. For this reason the movement mechanics of the chromosomes of the first meiotic division is briefly reviewed.The interpretation is expressed that the structure of the centromere region of a single chromatid shows some similarity to that of a univalent of the first meiotic division and that this may be the reason for their similar behaviour. The chromatid centromere would have a structural multiplicity with respect to its kinetic elements, corresponding to its subdivision in half-chromatids and also to the presence of two or three consecutive chromomeres in its longitudinal direction. As these kinetic elements are arranged close to one another on one side of the narrow cylinder of the centromere constriction, it is difficult for them to orient, towards both poles simultaneously. A single chromatid having a centromere of this kind will show orientation instability and change its orientation between the two unipolar orientations and various more or less bipolar orientations. The movements following these different orientations would cause the scattering of these single chromatids over the spindle. The orientation of ordinary mitotic metaphase chromosomes, consisting of two such chromatids, could often be the consequence of a process of co-orientation similar to that in meiotic bivalents.The anaphase movement of undivided chromosomes, which by active centromere movements are shifted in the polar directions without a separation of daughter components, is discussed with reference to a similar behaviour observed by Dietz in multivalents in Ostracods. These multivalents are stabilized in the equator during metaphase, in spite of the fact that they have two or three centromeres directed towards one pole and a single one towards the other. During anaphase their chromosomes do not separate but the whole configurations are shifted towards that pole towards which the majority of the centromeres are directed (this is followed by another type of movement which does not concern us in this connection). Undivided chromosomes that are oriented with more of their kinetic material towards one of the poles and less towards the other should by the same mechanisms as moved the multivalents be shifted in the equatorial direction during metaphase and in the polar direction during anaphase. The mechanism of these events is obscure. A change in the interpretation given by Dietz is suggested.This paper is dedicated to Professor Franz Schrader on the occasion of his seventieth birthday.     

Shugoshin1 may play important roles in separation of homologous chromosomes and sister chromatids during mouse oocyte meiosis

Background

Homologous chromosomes separate in meiosis I and sister chromatids separate in meiosis II, generating haploid gametes. To address the question why sister chromatids do not separate in meiosis I, we explored the roles of Shogoshin1 (Sgo1) in chromosome separation during oocyte meiosis.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Sgo1 function was evaluated by exogenous overexpression to enhance its roles and RNAi to suppress its roles during two meioses of mouse oocytes. Immunocytochemistry and chromosome spread were used to evaluate phenotypes. The exogenous Sgo1 overexpression kept homologous chromosomes and sister chromatids not to separate in meiosis I and meiosis II, respectively, while the Sgo1 RNAi promoted premature separation of sister chromatids.

Conclusions

Our results reveal that prevention of premature separation of sister chromatids in meiosis I requires the retention of centromeric Sgo1, while normal separation of sister chromatids in meiosis II requires loss of centromeric Sgo1.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">Arabidopsis</Emphasis> sister chromatids often show complete alignment or separation along a 1.2-Mb euchromatic region but no cohesion “hot spots”

Sister chromatid cohesion is a prerequisite for correct segregation and possibly other functions of replicated chromosomes. Except for yeast, no details are known about arrangement of cohesion sites along interphase chromosomes. Within nuclei of several higher plants, sister chromatids are frequently not aligned at various positions along chromosome arms. Therefore, we tested whether preferential alignment positions (“cohesion hot spots”) and constant extension of and distances between aligned sites occur in plants. Along a ~1.2-Mb contig from the bottom arm of chromosome 1, the sister chromatid positions of 13 individual BAC inserts were found to be aligned for ~67–77% of homologues in 4C Arabidopsis thaliana nuclei. The differences between the 13 BAC positions were not significant at the P < 0.01 level. This suggests variability of alignment positions between cells and indicates the absence of cohesion “hot spots”. Similar as for single BACs, FISH with the entire contig indicated complete alignment for ~69% and complete separation of sister chromatids for ~31% of homologues in 4C nuclei. Partial alignment or separation was barely detectable. When three BAC inserts from a 760-kb region were tested simultaneously, alignment or separation of only the central BAC occurred in 3.3% and 3.5% of replicated chromosomes, respectively. Thus, we assume that sister chromatids can be separated or aligned within a Mb range in differentiated cells. However, the minimum extension of aligned sites or distances between them may (in rare cases) fall below ~500 kb.     

Sister Chromatid Cohesion

During S phase, not only does DNA have to be replicated, but also newly synthesized DNA molecules have to be connected with each other. This sister chromatid cohesion is essential for the biorientation of chromosomes on the mitotic or meiotic spindle, and is thus an essential prerequisite for chromosome segregation. Cohesion is mediated by cohesin complexes that are thought to embrace sister chromatids as large rings. Cohesin binds to DNA dynamically before DNA replication and is converted into a stably DNA-bound form during replication. This conversion requires acetylation of cohesin, which in vertebrates leads to recruitment of sororin. Sororin antagonizes Wapl, a protein that is able to release cohesin from DNA, presumably by opening the cohesin ring. Inhibition of Wapl by sororin therefore “locks” cohesin rings on DNA and allows them to maintain cohesion for long periods of time in mammalian oocytes, possibly for months or even years.DNA replication during the synthesis (S) phase generates identical DNA molecules, which, in their chromatinized form, are called sister chromatids. The pairs of sister chromatids remain united as part of one chromosome during the subsequent gap (G₂) phase and during early mitosis, in prophase, prometaphase, and metaphase. During these stages of mitosis chromosomes condense, in most eukaryotes the nuclear envelope breaks down, and in all species chromosomes are ultimately attached to both poles of the mitotic spindle. Only once this biorientation has been achieved for all chromosomes, the sister chromatids are separated from each other in anaphase and transported toward opposite spindle poles of the mother cell, enabling its subsequent division into two genetically identical daughter cells.This series of events critically depends on the fact that sister chromatids remain physically connected with each other from S phase until metaphase. This physical connection, called sister chromatid cohesion, opposes the pulling forces that are generated by microtubules that attach to kinetochores and thereby enables the biorientation of chromosomes on the mitotic spindle (Tanaka et al. 2000b). Without cohesion, sister chromatids could therefore not be segregated symmetrically between the forming daughter cells, resulting in aneuploidy. For the same reasons, cohesion is essential for chromosome segregation in meiosis I and meiosis II. Cohesion defects in human oocytes can lead to aneuploidy, which is thought to be the major cause of spontaneous abortion, because only a few types of aneuploidy are compatible with viability, such as trisomy 21 (Down syndrome), trisomy 18 (Edwards syndrome), and trisomy 13 (Patau syndrome) (Hunt and Hassold 2010). Studying the mechanisms of cohesion is therefore essential for understanding how the genome is passed properly from one cell generation to the next.In addition, sister chromatid cohesion facilitates the repair of DNA double-strand breaks in cells that have replicated their DNA, where such breaks can be repaired by a homologous recombination mechanism that uses the undamaged sister chromatid as a template (for review, see Watrin et al. 2006). Furthermore, mutations in the proteins that are required for sister chromatid cohesion can cause defects in chromatin structure and gene regulation, and can in rare cases lead to congenital developmental disorders, called Cornelia de Lange syndrome, Roberts/SC Phocomelia syndrome, and Warsaw Breakage syndrome (for review, see Mannini et al. 2010).     

Chromosome breakage and rejoining of sister chromatids in Bloom's syndrome

The occurrence of chromosome breaks and reunion of sister chromatids in lymphocytes of two patients with Bloom's syndrome has been compared with those found in X-rayed and control cells. The distribution of breaks in BS is non-random both between and within chromosomes, the centric regions of certain chromosomes being preferentially involved. The following working hypotheses are put forward: When chromosome breaks in human lymphocytes occur in G₀— G₁, practically no sister chromatid reunion (SCR) takes place, whereas ends created by an S—G₂ break show a considerable tendency to SCR. We propose further that chromosome aberrations in BS mainly result from breaks in S—G₂, including possible U-type rejoining of sister chromatid exchanges. Fragments extra to an intact chromosome complement result from a chromatid break or an asymmetrical chromatid translocation in a previous mitosis.     

Sister telomeres rendered dysfunctional by persistent cohesion are fused by NHEJ

Telomeres protect chromosome ends from being viewed as double-strand breaks and from eliciting a DNA damage response. Deprotection of chromosome ends occurs when telomeres become critically short because of replicative attrition or inhibition of TRF2. In this study, we report a novel form of deprotection that occurs exclusively after DNA replication in S/G2 phase of the cell cycle. In cells deficient in the telomeric poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase tankyrase 1, sister telomere resolution is blocked. Unexpectedly, cohered sister telomeres become deprotected and are inappropriately fused. In contrast to telomeres rendered dysfunctional by TRF2, which engage in chromatid fusions predominantly between chromatids from different chromosomes (Bailey, S.M., M.N. Cornforth, A. Kurimasa, D.J. Chen, and E.H. Goodwin. 2001. Science. 293:2462–2465; Smogorzewska, A., J. Karlseder, H. Holtgreve-Grez, A. Jauch, and T. de Lange. 2002. Curr. Biol. 12:1635–1644), telomeres rendered dysfunctional by tankyrase 1 engage in chromatid fusions almost exclusively between sister chromatids. We show that cohered sister telomeres are fused by DNA ligase IV–mediated nonhomologous end joining. These results demonstrate that the timely removal of sister telomere cohesion is essential for the formation of a protective structure at chromosome ends after DNA replication in S/G2 phase of the cell cycle.     

Studies on the mitotic chromosome scaffold of Allium sativum

An argentophilic structure is present in the metaphase chromosomes of garlic(Allium sativum),Cytochemical studies indicate that the main component of the structure is non-histone proteins(NHPs).The results of light and electron microscopic observations reveal that the chromosme NHP scaffold is a network which is composed of fibres and granules and distributed throughout the chromosomes.In the NHP network,there are many condensed regions that are connected by redlatively looser regions.The distribution of the condensed regions varies in individual chromosomes.In some of the chromosomes the condensed regions are lognitudinally situsted in the central part of a chromatid while in others these regions appear as coillike transverse bands.At early metaphase.scaffolds of the sister chromatids of a chromosome are linked to each other in the centromeric region,meanwhile,they are connected by scafold materials along the whole length of the chromosome.At late metaphase,however,the connective scaffold materials between the two sister chromatids disappear gradually and the chromatids begin to separate from one another at their ends.but the chromatids are linked together in the centromeric region until anaphase.This connection seems to be related to the special structure of the NHP scaffold formed in the centromeric region.The morphological features and dynamic changes of the chromosome scaffold are discussed.     

Normal and BrdC-substituted chromosomes during spermatogenesis with an endomeiotic chromosome reduplication in Carausius morosus Br.

Spermatogenesis involving an additional chromosome reduplication during zygotene in sporadic males and intersexes of the thelytokous phasmid Carausius morosus Br. has been examined using differential staining of chromatids after 5-bromodeoxycytidine incorporation. After reduplication autobivalents are formed by synapsis between identical sister chromosomes. Chiasmata are only formed after reduplication; they do not occur in constitutive heterochromatin, but can be formed in facultative heterochromatin, dependent on heteropycnosis and sex. Quadrivalents and U-type exchanges occur. In spermatogonia and spermatocytes the number of differentially stained chromosomes varies considerably; sister chromatid exchanges hardly appear. Sex bivalents with differentially stained chromosomes have a lower chiasma frequency than normally stained sex bivalents. Bivalents show reduced staining of all four, two outer, or one inner chromatid. Autobivalents arise in the same way as diplochromosomes; chromatids with the oldest DNA sub-units remain together during reduplication and are thus involved in sister chromosome pairing. The additional reduplication begins 7 days after the premeiotic S-phase, first metaphase after 19 days. Spermatogenesis is abnormal from first anaphase onwards.     

Mitotic inter-homologue junctions accumulate at damaged DNA replication forks in recQ mutants

Mitotic homologous recombination is utilised to repair DNA breaks using either sister chromatids or homologous chromosomes as templates. Because sister chromatids are identical, exchanges between sister chromatids have no consequences for the maintenance of genomic integrity unless they involve repetitive DNA sequences. Conversely, homologous chromosomes might differ in genetic content, and exchanges between homologues might lead to loss of heterozygosity and subsequent inactivation of functional genes. Genomic instability, caused by unscheduled recombination events between homologous chromosomes, is enhanced in the absence of RecQ DNA helicases, as observed in Bloom's cancer-prone syndrome. Here, we used two-dimensional gel electrophoresis to analyse budding yeast diploid cells that were modified to distinguish replication intermediates originating from each homologous chromosome. Therefore, these cells were suitable for analysing the formation of inter-homologue junctions. We found that Rad51-dependent DNA structures resembling inter-homologue junctions accumulate together with sister chromatid junctions at damaged DNA replication forks in recQ mutants, but not in the absence of Srs2 or Mph1 DNA recombination helicases. Inter-homologue joint molecules in recQ mutants are less abundant than sister chromatid junctions, but they accumulate with similar kinetics after origin firing under conditions of DNA damage. We propose that unscheduled accumulation of inter-homologue junctions during DNA replication might account for allelic recombination defects in recQ mutants.     

The analysis of exchanges in tritium-labelled meiotic chromosomes

The autoradiographic analysis of exchanges in tritium-labelled meiotic chromosomes is potentially a useful approach to the study of meiotic exchange events since this method differentially labels meiotic chromatids along their entire length. The main problem encountered in earlier autoradiographic studies is that of distinguishing label exchanges generated at chiasmata from label exchanges generated by sister chromatid exchange. This problem was overcome in the present study by the choice of a meiotic system (male meiosis of Stethophyma grossum) where chiasmata are limited to just one proximally localised chiasma in each bivalent. This system allows the positive identification of chiasma-generated label exchanges and demonstrates convincingly the origin of chiasmata through breakage and rejoining of homologous non-sister chromatids. Sister chromatid exchanges are also readily detected in labelled meiotic chromosomes of this species, where they occur with a mean frequency of 0.35 per chromosome. This frequency is similar to that found in mitotic spermatogonial cells and the exchanges are randomly distributed both within and between chromosomes. These features of meiotic sister chromatid exchanges suggest that they are unrelated to non-sister chiasmatic exchanges and they probably have no special meiotic significance.     

A non-sister act: Recombination template choice during meiosis

Meiotic recombination has two key functions: the faithful assortment of chromosomes into gametes and the creation of genetic diversity. Both processes require that meiotic recombination occurs between homologous chromosomes, rather than sister chromatids. Accordingly, a host of regulatory factors are activated during meiosis to distinguish sisters from homologs, suppress recombination between sister chromatids and promote the chromatids of the homologous chromosome as the preferred recombination partners. Here, we discuss the recent advances in our understanding of the mechanistic basis of meiotic recombination template choice, focusing primarily on developments in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, where the regulation is currently best understood.     

Ultrastructure and division behaviour of dinoflagellate chromosomes

Chromosomes of Prorocentrum triestinum and P. micans have similar substructural and morphometrical values as revealed by electron microscopy of thin sections. However, differences were found between the species in mean length, volume and numerical density of chromosomes, and the volume of the chromosome complement, the nuclear volume and the chromosome number. When examined by a whole-mount procedure both Prorocentrum species have left-handed screw-like chromosomes which end in differentiated telomeres. The chromosomes divide sequentially from one telomere towards the other, presenting a Y and finally a V configuration. At the region where each chromosome divides nascent sister chromatids are connected by two bridges. Sister chromatids have similar quantitative values when compared with each other and with the still undivided chromosome, which suggests that both replication and division take place as coupled events.Supported by CAICYT, grant 2409/83     

Sgo1 is required for co-segregation of sister chromatids during achiasmate meiosis I

The reduction of chromosome number during meiosis is achieved by two successive rounds of chromosome segregation, called meiosis I and meiosis II. While meiosis II is similar to mitosis in that sister kinetochores are bi-oriented and segregate to opposite poles, recombined homologous chromosomes segregate during the first meiotic division. Formation of chiasmata, mono-orientation of sister kinetochores and protection of centromeric cohesion are three major features of meiosis I chromosomes which ensure the reductional nature of chromosome segregation. Here we show that sister chromatids frequently segregate to opposite poles during meiosis I in fission yeast cells that lack both chiasmata and the protector of centromeric cohesion Sgo1. Our data are consistent with the notion that sister kinetochores are frequently bi-oriented in the absence of chiasmata and that Sgo1 prevents equational segregation of sister chromatids during achiasmate meiosis I.Key words: meiosis, chromosome segregation, recombination, kinetochore, Sgo1, fission yeast     

Minichromosome analysis of chromosome pairing, disjunction, and sister chromatid cohesion in maize

With the advent of engineered minichromosome technology in plants, an understanding of the properties of small chromosomes is desirable. Twenty-two minichromosomes of related origin but varying in size are described that provide a unique resource to study such behavior. Fourteen minichromosomes from this set could pair with each other in meiotic prophase at frequencies between 25 and 100%, but for the smaller chromosomes, the sister chromatids precociously separated in anaphase I. The other eight minichromosomes did not pair with themselves, and the sister chromatids divided equationally at meiosis I. In plants containing one minichromosome, the sister chromatids also separated at meiosis I. In anaphase II, the minichromosomes progressed to one pole or the other. The maize (Zea mays) Shugoshin protein, which has been hypothesized to protect centromere cohesion in meiosis I, is still present at anaphase I on minichromosomes that divide equationally. Also, there were no differences in the level of phosphorylation of Ser-10 of histone H3, a correlate of cohesion, in the minichromosomes in which sister chromatids separated during anaphase I compared with the normal chromosomes. These analyses suggest that meiotic centromeric cohesion is compromised in minichromosomes depending on their size and cannot be maintained by the mechanisms used by normal-sized chromosomes.     

Mechanisms of chromosome orientation revealed by two meiotic mutants in Drosophila melanogaster

Two disjunction defective meiotic mutants, ord and mei-S332, each of which disrupts meiosis in both male and female Drosophila melanogaster, were analyzed cytologically and genetically in the male germ-line. It was observed that sister-chromatids are frequently associated abnormally during prophase I and metaphase I in ord. Sister chromatid associations in mei-S332 are generally normal during prophase I and metaphase I. By telophase I, sister chromatids have frequently precociously separated in both mutants. During the first division sister chromatids disjoin from one another frequently in ord and rarely in mei-S332. It is argued that the simplest interpretation of the observations is that each mutant is defective in sister chromatid cohesiveness and that the defect in ord manifests itself earlier than does the defect in mei-S332. In addition, based on these mutant effects, several conclusions regarding normal meiotic processes are drawn. (1) The phenotype of these mutants support the proposition that the second meiotic metaphase (mitotic-type) position of chromosomes and their equational orientation is a consequence of the equilibrium, at the metaphase plate, of pulling forces acting at the kinetochores and directed towards the poles. (2) Chromosomes which lag during the second meiotic division tend to be lost. (3) Sister chromatid cohesiveness, or some function necessary for sister chromatid cohesiveness, is required for the normal reductional orientation of sister kinetochores during the first meiotic division. (4) The kinetochores of a half-bivalent are double at the time of chromosome orientation during the first meiotic division. Finally, functions which are required throughout meiosis in both sexes must be considered in the pathways of meiotic control.     

A Subunit of the Anaphase-Promoting Complex Is a Centromere-Associated Protein in Mammalian Cells

Sister chromatids in early mitotic cells are held together mainly by interactions between centromeres. The separation of sister chromatids at the transition between the metaphase and the anaphase stages of mitosis depends on the anaphase-promoting complex (APC), a 20S ubiquitin-ligase complex that targets proteins for destruction. A subunit of the APC, called APC-α in Xenopus (and whose homologs are APC-1, Cut4, BIME, and Tsg24), has recently been identified and shown to be required for entry into anaphase. We now show that the mammalian APC-α homolog, Tsg24, is a centromere-associated protein. While this protein is detected only during the prophase to the anaphase stages of mitosis in Chinese hamster cells, it is constitutively associated with the centromeres in murine cells. We show that there are two forms of this protein in mammalian cells, a soluble form associated with other components of the APC and a centromere-bound form. We also show that both the Tsg24 protein and the Cdc27 protein, another APC component, are bound to isolated mitotic chromosomes. These results therefore support a model in which the APC by ubiquitination of a centromere protein regulates the sister chromatid separation process.