Interaction between the NH2-terminal domain of eIF4A and the central domain of eIF4G modulates RNA-stimulated ATPase activity

The eukaryotic translation factor 4A (eIF4A) is a member of DEA(D/H)-box RNA helicase family, a diverse group of proteins that couples ATP hydrolysis to RNA binding and duplex separation. eIF4A participates in the initiation of translation by unwinding secondary structure in the 5'-untranslated region of mRNAs and facilitating scanning by the 40 S ribosomal subunit for the initiation codon. eIF4A alone has only weak ATPase and helicase activities, but these are stimulated by eIF4G, eIF4B, and eIF4H. eIF4G has two eIF4A-binding sites, one in the central domain (cp(C3)) and one in the COOH-terminal domain (cp(C2)). In the current work, we demonstrate that these two eIF4G domains have different effects on the RNA-stimulated ATPase activity of eIF4A. cp(C3) stimulates ATP-hydrolytic efficiency by about 40-fold through two mechanisms: lowering K(m)(RNA) by 10-fold and raising k(cat) by 4-fold. cp(C3) also stimulates RNA cross-linking to eIF4A in an ATP-independent manner. Studies with eIF4G and eIF4A variants suggest a model by which cp(C3) alters the conformation of the catalytic site to favor RNA binding. cp(C2) does not stimulate ATPase activity and furthermore increases both K(m)(ATP) (at saturating RNA concentrations) and K(m)(RNA) (at subsaturating ATP concentrations). Both cp(C3) and cp(C2) directly interact with the NH(2)-terminal domain of eIF4A, which possesses conserved ATP- and oligonucleotide-binding motifs, but not with the COOH-terminal domain.     

Mutually cooperative binding of eukaryotic translation initiation factor (eIF) 3 and eIF4A to human eIF4G-1

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4G-1 (eIF4G) plays a critical role in the recruitment of mRNA to the 43 S preinitiation complex. The central region of eIF4G binds the ATP-dependent RNA helicase eIF4A, the 40 S binding factor eIF3, and RNA. In the present work, we have further characterized the binding properties of the central region of human eIF4G. Both titration and competition experiments were consistent with a 1:1 stoichiometry for eIF3 binding. Surface plasmon resonance studies showed that three recombinant eIF4G fragments corresponding to amino acids 642-1560, 613-1078, and 975-1078 bound eIF3 with similar kinetics. A dissociation equilibrium constant of approximately 42 nm was derived from an association rate constant of 3.9 x 10(4) m(-1) s(-1) and dissociation rate constant of 1.5 x 10(-3) s(-1). Thus, the eIF3-binding region is included within amino acid residues 975-1078. This region does not overlap with the RNA-binding site, which suggests that eIF3 binds eIF4G directly and not through an RNA bridge, or the central eIF4A-binding site. Surprisingly, the binding of eIF3 and eIF4A to the central region was mutually cooperative; eIF3 binding to eIF4G increased 4-fold in the presence of eIF4A, and conversely, eIF4A binding to the central (but not COOH-terminal) region of eIF4G increased 2.4-fold in the presence of eIF3.     

eIF4G, eIFiso4G, and eIF4B bind the poly(A)-binding protein through overlapping sites within the RNA recognition motif domains

The poly(A)-binding protein (PABP), a protein that contains four conserved RNA recognition motifs (RRM1-4) and a C-terminal domain, is expressed throughout the eukaryotic kingdom and promotes translation through physical and functional interactions with eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4G and eIF4B. Two highly divergent isoforms of eIF4G, known as eIF4G and eIFiso4G, are expressed in plants. As little is known about how PABP can interact with RNA and three distinct translation initiation factors in plants, the RNA binding specificity and organization of the protein interaction domains in wheat PABP was investigated. Wheat PABP differs from animal PABP in that its RRM1 does not bind RNA as an individual domain and that RRM 2, 3, and 4 exhibit different RNA binding specificities to non-poly(A) sequences. The PABP interaction domains for eIF4G and eIFiso4G were distinct despite the functional similarity between the eIF4G proteins. A single interaction domain for eIF4G is present in the RRM1 of PABP, whereas eIFiso4G interacts at two sites, i.e. one within RRM1-2 and the second within RRM3-4. The eIFiso4G binding site in RRM1-2 mapped to a 36-amino acid region encompassing the C-terminal end of RRM1, the linker region, and the N-terminal end of RRM2, whereas the second site in RRM3-4 was more complex. A single interaction domain for eIF4B is present within a 32-amino acid region representing the C-terminal end of RRM1 of PABP that overlaps with the N-proximal eIFiso4G interaction domain. eIF4B and eIFiso4G exhibited competitive binding to PABP, supporting the overlapping nature of their interaction domains. These results support the notion that eIF4G, eIFiso4G, and eIF4B interact with distinct molecules of PABP to increase the stability of the interaction between the termini of an mRNA.     

The phosphorylation state of poly(A)-binding protein specifies its binding to poly(A) RNA and its interaction with eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4F, eIFiso4F, and eIF4B

The poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) interacts with the eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4G (or eIFiso4G), the large subunit of eIF4F (or eIFiso4F) to promote translation initiation. In plants, PABP also interacts with eIF4B, a factor that assists eIF4F function. PABP is a phosphoprotein, although the function of its phosphorylation has not been previously investigated. In this study, we have purified the phosphorylated and hypophosphorylated isoforms of PABP from wheat to examine whether its phosphorylation state affects its binding to poly(A) RNA and its interaction with eIF4G, eIFiso4G, or eIF4B. Phosphorylated PABP exhibited cooperative binding to poly(A) RNA even under non-stoichiometric binding conditions, whereas multiple molecules of hypophosphorylated PABP bound to poly(A) RNA only after free poly(A) RNA was no longer available. Together, phosphorylated and hypophosphorylated PABP exhibited synergistic binding. eIF4B interacted with PABP in a phosphorylation state-specific manner; native eIF4B increased the RNA binding activity specifically of phosphorylated PABP and was greater than 14-fold more effective than was recombinant eIF4B, whereas eIF4F promoted the cooperative binding of hypophosphorylated PABP. These data suggest that the phosphorylation state of PABP specifies the type of binding to poly(A) RNA and its interaction with its partner proteins.     

Characterization of the two eIF4A-binding sites on human eIF4G-1

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4G-1 (eIF4G) plays a critical role in the recruitment of mRNA to the 43 S preinitiation complex. eIF4G has two binding sites for the RNA helicase eIF4A, one in the central domain and one in the COOH-terminal domain. Recombinant eIF4G fragments that contained each of these sites separately bound eIF4A with a 1:1 stoichiometry, but fragments containing both sites bound eIF4A with a 1:2 stoichiometry. eIF3 did not interfere with eIF4A binding to the central site. Interestingly, at the same concentration of free eIF4A, more eIF4A was bound to an eIF4G fragment containing both eIF4A sites than the sum of binding to fragments containing the single sites, indicating cooperative binding. Binding of eIF4A to an immobilized fragment of eIF4G containing the COOH-terminal site was competed by a soluble eIF4G fragment containing the central site, indicating that a single eIF4A molecule cannot bind simultaneously to both sites. The association rate constant, dissociation rate constant, and dissociation equilibrium constant for each site were determined by surface plasmon resonance and found to be, respectively, 1.2 x 10(5) m(-1) s(-1), 2.1 x 10(-3) s(-1), and 17 nm for the central site and 5.1 x 10(3) m(-1) s(-1), 1.7 x 10(-3) s(-1), and 330 nm for the COOH-terminal site.     

Tobacco etch virus mRNA preferentially binds wheat germ eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4G rather than eIFiso4G

The 5'-leader of tobacco etch virus (TEV) genomic RNA directs the efficient translation from the naturally uncapped viral RNA. The TEV 143-nt 5'-leader folds into a structure that contains two domains, each of which contains RNA pseudoknots. The 5'-proximal pseudoknot 1 (PK1) is necessary to promote cap-independent translation (Zeenko, V., and Gallie, D. R. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 26813-26824). During the translation initiation of cellular mRNAs, eIF4G functions as an adapter that recruits many of the factors involved in stimulating 40 S ribosomal subunit binding to an mRNA. Two related but highly distinct eIF4G proteins are expressed in plants, animals, and yeast. The two plant eIF4G isoforms, referred to as eIF4G and eIFiso4G, differ in size (165 and 86 kDa, respectively) and their functional differences are still unclear. Although eIF4G is required for the translation of TEV mRNA, it is not known if eIF4G binds directly to the TEV RNA itself or if other factors are required. To determine whether binding affinity and isoform preference correlates with translational efficiency, fluorescence spectroscopy was used to measure the binding of eIF4G, eIFiso4G, and their complexes (eIF4F and eIFiso4F, respectively) to the TEV 143-nt 5'-leader (TEV1-143) and a shorter RNA that contained PK1. A mutant (i.e. S1-3) in which the stem of PK1 was disrupted resulting in impaired cap-independent translation, was also tested. These studies demonstrate that eIF4G binds TEV1-143 and PK1 RNA with approximately 22-30-fold stronger affinity than eIFiso4G. eIF4G and eIF4F bind TEV1-143 with similar affinity, whereas eIFiso4F binds with approximately 6-fold higher affinity than eIFiso4G. The binding affinity of eIF4G, eIF4F, and eIFiso4G to S1-3 was reduced by 3-5-fold, consistent with the reduction in the ability of this mutant to promote cap-independent translation. Temperature-dependent binding studies revealed that binding of the TEV 5'-leader to these initiation factors has a large entropic contribution. Overall, these results demonstrate the first direct interaction of eIF4G with the TEV 5'-leader in the absence of other initiation factors. These data correlate well with the observed translational data and provide more detailed information on the translational strategy of potyviruses.     

RNA binding specificity of hnRNP A1: significance of hnRNP A1 high-affinity binding sites in pre-mRNA splicing.

Pre-mRNA is processed as a large complex of pre-mRNA, snRNPs and pre-mRNA binding proteins (hnRNP proteins). The significance of hnRNP proteins in mRNA biogenesis is likely to be reflected in their RNA binding properties. We have determined the RNA binding specificity of hnRNP A1 and of each of its two RNA binding domains (RBDs), by selection/amplification from pools of random sequence RNA. Unique RNA molecules were selected by hnRNP A1 and each individual RBD, suggesting that the RNA binding specificity of hnRNP A1 is the result of both RBDs acting as a single RNA binding composite. Interestingly, the consensus high-affinity hnRNP A1 binding site, UAGGGA/U, resembles the consensus sequences of vertebrate 5' and 3' splice sites. The highest affinity 'winner' sequence for hnRNP A1 contained a duplication of this sequence separated by two nucleotides, and was bound by hnRNP A1 with an apparent dissociation constant of 1 x 10(-9) M. hnRNP A1 also bound other RNA sequences, including pre-mRNA splice sites and an intron-derived sequence, but with reduced affinities, demonstrating that hnRNP A1 binds different RNA sequences with a > 100-fold range of affinities. These experiments demonstrate that hnRNP A1 is a sequence-specific RNA binding protein. UV light-induced protein-RNA crosslinking in nuclear extracts demonstrated that an oligoribonucleotide containing the A1 winner sequence can be used as a specific affinity reagent for hnRNP A1 and an unidentified 50 kDa protein. We also show that this oligoribonucleotide, as well as two others containing 5' and 3' pre-mRNA splice sites, are potent inhibitors of in vitro pre-mRNA splicing.     

Effects of poly(A)-binding protein on the interactions of translation initiation factor eIF4F and eIF4F.4B with internal ribosome entry site (IRES) of tobacco etch virus RNA

In wheat germ, the interaction between poly(A)-binding protein and eukaryotic initiation factor eIF 4G increases the affinity of eIF4E for the cap by 20-40-fold. Recent findings that wheat germ eIF4G is required for interaction with the IRES, pseudoknot 1 (PK1), of tobacco etch virus to promote cap-independent translation led us to investigate the effects of PABP on the interaction of eIF4F with PK1. The fluorescence anisotropy data showed addition of PABP to eIF4F increased the binding affinity approximately 2.0-fold for PK1 RNA as compared with eIF4F alone. Addition of both PABP and eIF4B to eIF4F enhance binding affinity to PK1 about 4-fold, showing an additive effect rather than the large increase in affinity shown for cap binding. The van't Hoff analyses showed that PK1 RNA binding to eIF4F, eIF4F.PABP, eIF4F.4B and eIF4F.4B.PABP is enthalpy-driven and entropy-favorable. PABP and eIF4B decreased the entropic contribution 65% for binding of PK1 RNA to eIF4F. The lowering of entropy for the formation of eIF4F.4B.PABP-PK1 complex suggested reduced hydrophobic interactions for complex formation. Overall, these results demonstrate the first direct effect of PABP on the interaction of eIF4F and eIF4F.4B with PK1 RNA.     

The domains of yeast eIF4G,eIF4E and the cap fine-tune eIF4A activities through an intricate network of stimulatory and inhibitory effects

Translation initiation in eukaryotes starts with the recognition of the mRNA 5′-cap by eIF4F, a hetero-trimeric complex of eIF4E, the cap-binding protein, eIF4A, a DEAD-box helicase, and eIF4G, a scaffold protein. eIF4G comprises eIF4E- and eIF4A-binding domains (4E-BD, 4A-BD) and three RNA-binding regions (RNA1–RNA3), and interacts with eIF4A, eIF4E, and with the mRNA. Within the eIF4F complex, the helicase activity of eIF4A is increased. We showed previously that RNA3 of eIF4G is important for the stimulation of the eIF4A conformational cycle and its ATPase and helicase activities. Here, we dissect the interplay between the eIF4G domains and the role of the eIF4E/cap interaction in eIF4A activation. We show that RNA2 leads to an increase in the fraction of eIF4A in the closed state, an increased RNA affinity, and faster RNA unwinding. This stimulatory effect is partially reduced when the 4E-BD is present. eIF4E binding to the 4E-BD then further inhibits the helicase activity and closing of eIF4A, but does not affect the RNA-stimulated ATPase activity of eIF4A. The 5′-cap renders the functional interaction of mRNA with eIF4A less efficient. Overall, the activity of eIF4A at the 5′-cap is thus fine-tuned by a delicately balanced network of stimulatory and inhibitory interactions.     

Multiple elements in the eIF4G1 N-terminus promote assembly of eIF4G1•PABP mRNPs in vivo

eIF4G is the scaffold subunit of the eIF4F complex, whose binding domains for eIF4E and poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) are thought to enhance formation of activated eIF4F•mRNA•PABP complexes competent to recruit 43S pre-initiation complexes. We found that the RNA-binding region (RNA1) in the N-terminal domain (NTD) of yeast eIF4G1 can functionally substitute for the PABP-binding segment to rescue the function of an eIF4G1-459 mutant impaired for eIF4E binding. Assaying RNA-dependent PABP–eIF4G association in cell extracts suggests that RNA1, the PABP-binding domain, and two conserved elements (Box1 and Box2) between these segments have overlapping functions in forming native eIF4G•mRNA•PABP complexes. In vitro experiments confirm the role of RNA1 in stabilizing eIF4G–mRNA association, and further indicate that RNA1 and Box1 promote PABP binding, in addition to RNA binding, by the eIF4G1 NTD. Our findings indicate that PABP–eIF4G association is only one of several interactions that stabilize eIF4F•mRNA complexes, and emphasize that closed-loop mRNP formation via PABP–eIF4G interaction is non-essential in vivo. Interestingly, two other RNA-binding regions in eIF4G1 have critical functions downstream of eIF4F•mRNA assembly.     

Polypyrimidine tract-binding protein and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 bind to human T-cell leukemia virus type 2 RNA regulatory elements.

Efficient expression of human T-cell leukemia virus (HTLV) and human immunodeficiency virus structural proteins requires Rx and Rev proteins, respectively. Decreased expression of Gag and Env appears to be due, in part, to intragenic RNA sequences, termed cis-acting repressive sequences (CRS), and may be mediated by binding of specific cellular factors. We demonstrated previously that two cellular proteins, p60CRS and p40CRS, interact with HTLV type 2.5' long terminal repeat CRS RNA and that the interaction of both proteins with CRS RNA correlates with function (A. C. Black, C. T. Ruland, J. Luo, A. Bakker, J. K. Fraser, and J. D. Rosenblatt, Virology 200:29-41, 1994). By radioimmunoprecipitation of HeLa nuclear proteins UV cross-linked to CRS RNAs with murine monoclonal antibodies, we now show that p40CRS is heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) A1 and p60CRS is polypyrimidine tract-binding protein or hnRNP I. These immunoprecipitation results were confirmed by an immunobinding assay with hnRNP I and hnRNP AI antibodies and by cross-competition electrophoretic mobility shift experiments. In addition, we mapped a putative hnRNP A1 binding site in U5 RNA and demonstrated that p40CRS (hnRNP A1) binding to that site correlates with CRS function. Since both hnRNP I and hnRNP A1 have been shown to influence splicing and potentially other steps in RNA processing, the binding of both hnRNP I and hnRNP A1 to HTLV RNA regulatory elements may alter retrovirus RNA processing and may be involved in regulation by Rex.     

RNA aptamers to mammalian initiation factor 4G inhibit cap-dependent translation by blocking the formation of initiation factor complexes

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4G (eIF4G) plays a crucial multimodulatory role in mRNA translation and decay by interacting with other translation factors and mRNA-associated proteins. In this study, we isolated eight different RNA aptamers with high affinity to mammalian eIF4G by in vitro RNA selection amplification. Of these, three aptamers (apt3, apt4, and apt5) inhibited the cap-dependent translation of two independent mRNAs in a rabbit reticulocyte lysate system. The cap-independent translation directed by an HCV internal ribosome entry site was not affected. Addition of exogenous eIF4G reversed the aptamer-mediated inhibition of translation. Even though apt3 and apt4 were selected independently, they differ only by two nucleotides. The use of truncated eIF4G variants in binding experiments indicated that apt4 (and probably apt3) bind to both the middle and C-terminal domains of eIF4G, while apt5 binds only to the middle domain of eIF4G. Corresponding to the difference in the binding sites in eIF4G, apt4, but not apt5, hindered eIF4G from binding to eIF4A and eIF3, in a purified protein solution system as well as in a crude lysate system. Therefore, the inhibition of translation by apt4 (and apt3) is due to the inhibition of formation of initiation factor complexes involving eIF4A and eIF3. On the other hand, apt5 had a much weaker affinity to eIF4G than apt4, but inhibited translation much more efficiently by an unknown mechanism. The five additional aptamers have sequences and predicted secondary structures that are largely different from each other and from apt3 through apt5. Therefore, we speculate that these seven sets of aptamers may bind to different regions in eIF4G in different fashions.